Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, iOS or Android: con.onelink.me/kZW6/4jquhrlc
@muhammadhuzaifaazam11 ай бұрын
I'll play and download this just to support you guys. Well done!!
@orionstarstudio697711 ай бұрын
Love the Game
@edmationz11 ай бұрын
Currently playing the Game right now
@micksmith-vt5yi11 ай бұрын
Lol you forgot these destroyers and US carriers use a Australian invention called Nulka as defense, it is a hovering decoy rocket and battle proven against Houthis in Red sea since 2016 when USS Mason first used it and has been last few months also.
@sunilnagoji10 ай бұрын
not know nothing about no * OMG बट హౌ
@muhammadhuzaifaazam11 ай бұрын
A suggestion a 3:46. Please use accurate 24 km representation, instead of a world map and a ship in the Atlantic. This would give the impression that the ship could stike London by just being in the middle of the Atlantic. Your videos are amazing and having more accuracy would only improve them
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Noted our New Animator got a little excited with the exacteration
@jimmaynard11 ай бұрын
@@Aitellythanks for the explanation
@TheMacDonald2211 ай бұрын
@@Aitelly lmao, I would too.
@thaixp549511 ай бұрын
@@Aitelly Lol I was thinking how in the world does that canon reach both side of the ocean
@Talven8111 ай бұрын
Ha came here to say the same.
@MrFalut11 ай бұрын
That 24km radius ... 🤣 Great video !
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Apologies our new Animator got a little bit excited on this project
@ktwei11 ай бұрын
Small World
@tinker51111 ай бұрын
I was soo confused i was like wtf, why do missels exist😂
@TampaDave10 ай бұрын
@@tinker511Actually I checked, and "missels" DON'T exist. If they ever DO, please make an entry in wikipedia.
@nothinginparticular187910 ай бұрын
Why would you throw your animator under the bus that hard? You need better management skills
@davec340011 ай бұрын
The bridge is merely where they steer the ship and tell it where to go. The CIC (combat information center) is more the command and control center of the ship. It's where all the sensors feed into and where all the ship's weapon system can be control.
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Noted
@davidsyes597010 ай бұрын
There's also Aft Steering and there are multiple radar rooms which might have tie-in to navigation radar for collision avoidance in extreme cases. Tbis would be in addition to the radar rooms neing configured as local conteol stations for laying or directing ordnance onto targets. The Bridge is just the traditional command location when not in combat conditions. If the bridge is damaged, and if CIC is also damaged, then, CCS (Central Control Station) can take over. The ship has numerous cameras for various reasons, so, some can be used if personnel must remain inside the skin of the ship. However, if you're super interested in "failures to communicate", look up the NTSB and other sources for a roughly 80-page report that specifically breaks down the failure modes and other issues regarding the collisions of the USS JOHN S. MCCAIN and the USS FITZGERALD when in a few months apart they separately collided with tankers which given the heft/girth/mass/speed could have outright sunk those ships if hit in the right location. Sadly, given design choices and politics (don't let the DDG-51 dare compete with or threaten the new and beloved or "darling" Aegis Program cruisers, per some corners) from decades ago, sleeping below the waterline and being hit by a bulbous bow and overhang anchor of a merchant, however rare, can prove exceedingly deadly when the lookous, radar, beacons, and GPS all fail all at once.
@samiel99210 ай бұрын
Was going to state this then saw this comment bravo
@thejdgoodwin4 ай бұрын
As a former OS my feelings were hurt that they left out CIC.
@johnblackhead23843 ай бұрын
Not exactly. CIC is relied on during combat. Otherwise the bridge is in complete control. I was a navigator for 20 years and I spent half my time on the bridge.
@yojimbo368110 ай бұрын
3:43 Bro, why did you draw 14 miles as the entire Atlantic Ocean? 🤣
@michaelpielorz92839 ай бұрын
we are impressed by yourknowledge, you surely must be an american professor!
@Joa9047 ай бұрын
it's all made by AI
@TravisKastl-ui9mk6 ай бұрын
@@Joa904 Which explains all the mispronounced words lmao.
@freddyfox500212 күн бұрын
"14miles" shows 2500miles diameter on map 😂
@overlooting21953 ай бұрын
I had no idea that the Atlantic Ocean was only 24 kilometers wide
@dundonrl11 ай бұрын
There are no diesel generators on an Arleigh Burke class DDG, they have three Rolls Royce gas turbine generators, the first 28 ships of the class have 90 Mk-41 cells, the rest have 96. For the 5" gun, there's nothing automated about moving the shells and powder casings from the racks where they are stowed to the vertical hoist (that's done by about 4 or 5 Sailors). There are no "reverse" gears on them either, but they use variable pitch propellers, so instead of having to stop and spin the propellers backwards, you just change the angle of the blades on it to make the ship move in reverse.
@ToddRainer-j4d10 ай бұрын
On the Hoel, DDG-13 we had 4 steam powered main generators and 2 emergency diesel generators (One forward, one aft). Burke's don't have emergency diesel generators?
@dundonrl10 ай бұрын
@@ToddRainer-j4d Nope, just three gas turbine generators. Normally just run on two of them. They use a helicopter gas turbine to start the generator main gas turbine and that helicopter gas turbine (starter) engine uses two 12 volt batteries to start it.
@ToddRainer-j4d10 ай бұрын
@@dundonrl Interesting. I like having two separate systems separated in the ship. I the main spaces were hit, and that's always likely - then the forward and aft generators will at least provide emergency power for coms and the like.
@dundonrl10 ай бұрын
@@ToddRainer-j4d The generators are separated into separate engine rooms and auxiliary machinery rooms, they aren't all in the same location.
@davidsyes597010 ай бұрын
@user-ui1kv8lo5l That's assuming the shock of a collision, a bomb blast, or grounding doesn't knock the gens off the line. I'd heard/read that the bombing of the Cole was so severe blast (the boat-bomb masquerading as a port serviced or harbor aide) it shock-wrecked the GTGS Nr 1 (below CIC and Nr 2 (MER 2) and the crew ended up using firehoses and a bucket brigade to get fuel (drawn from tanks probably 2 or more compartments forward of the Nr 3 GTGS?) some decks below the Hangar Bay into the aft gast turbine generator (GTG Nr 3) fuel feed line. Firehouse are not meant for fuel transfer, so, IIUC, the hoses contaminated thenfuel, and the strainers couldn't keep up. I served on the Flint (AE-32) (1/85-3/86) and on the John A. Moore (FFG-19) (~10/86-4/88), and it was not fun when the diesels dropped the load and it took 3-15 minutes to restore power and reload all surface and air contacts (whether by hand or backup data cartridges). Unless hit with a shipwrecker missile, most combatants should not lose ALL power simultaneously nor spend 20 minutes restoring it. But, it seems gennies are sensitve to shock more than advertised, I suppose.
@ChristopherGriffin-ee2ol11 ай бұрын
For those who are wondering about the MK.45 Naval Gun General Characteristics Primary Function: Fully-automatic, naval gun mount. Date Deployed: 1971 (Mark 45 Mod 0) Range: 13 nautical miles (14.9 statute miles) with conventional ammunition. Type Fire: 16-20 rounds per minute automatic, conventional ammunition. Magazine Capacity: 600 rounds conventional for Destroyers; 1200 rounds conventional for Cruisers. Caliber: 5 inch 54 caliber (MK 54 Mod 1/2) barrel length of 270 inches (54 x 5) Guidance System: MK 45 Gun Mount is remotely fired from the MK 160 Gun Computer System or MK 86 Gun Fire Control System during normal operations Platforms: MK 45 MOD 1 (5"/54) - CGs 61, 65-68 (2 gun mounts per ship). MK 45 MOD 2 (5"/54) - DDGs 51-80 5" 54 (1 gun mount per ship); CGs 69-73 (2 gun mounts per ship). MK 45 MOD 4 (5"/62) - DDG 81-113AF (1 gun mount per ship); CG 52-60, 62-64 (2 gun mounts per ship).
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Thanks for your feedback
@ChristopherGriffin-ee2ol11 ай бұрын
@@Aitelly You're welcome
@yukik1993 ай бұрын
Add the metric system, please
@LocateA10 ай бұрын
I appreciate the dedication and professionalism of the US Navy.
@Consonat11 ай бұрын
This is the most detailed 3D graphic of US Navy destroyers I've seen on KZbin. Thank you everybody for putting in the hard work 🤟☘️♥️
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
You are Awesome 😎. Only some people understands 3D animation and modeling. Thanks again 👍🏻😁
@jjwwqq9 ай бұрын
So, based on the graphic, does this mean that the Atlantic Ocean is about 25 miles wide?
@elementalgolem5498Ай бұрын
exactly right! any other info is Misinformation spready by the goverment to make you feel less connected to the countries "across the pond" why else would it be called a pond if it wasn't rather small!
@aitellybangla11 ай бұрын
This is the most detailed 3D graphic of US Navy destroyers on KZbin. Thank you for putting hard work.
@DragonsREpic20 күн бұрын
thats the biggest 24mile radius I ever seen
@gloriousmka981810 ай бұрын
What a huge 24 km hahaha... From Istanbul Turkiye to the Titanic shipwreck in the middle of the Atlantic ocean. :D Greetings from Türkiye. Thanks for this beautiful video.
@joelr.933011 ай бұрын
Impressive, most impressive. My favorite How it works video was that of the submarine in which you used the Virginia class block V intended version to accommodate additional tomahawk missiles. As previously stated though a single silo could accommodate 7 tomahawks I would nonetheless reserve one of the silos for a Trident ll D5 14 warhead ballistic missile as a backup to the Trident and future Columbia DC boomers. Spreading strategic forces making them difficult to target.
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Ok thanks for your feedback. Will keep that in mind.
@Adam-oq4xq9 ай бұрын
9:05 That rudder explanation 🤣 Thank you captain 😁
@imperialresolution4 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@DocuAddict66611 ай бұрын
the 24km issue got mentioned enough Just a little heads up, these are fine animations and I really enjoy looking at them. So uhm, thanks 😍
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the info! 😌
@FunkyMunkey00_8 ай бұрын
someone actually aware
@skipd91648 ай бұрын
As part of the RD team that manufactured the high speed reduction gearing for DDG 51. Working in the GEAR plant in Lynn MASS for GE. I ran the largest 7 axis cnc horz boring mill especially installed for the project. Myself and another machinist machined the prototype high speed reduction gearing required for testing. I wish more was talked about because in 87 after they went into production I resigned. I completely left the machinist trade fora better life and did
@TrusePkay11 ай бұрын
Who remembered the series The Last Ship. Remember the confrontation between Nathan James and the British sub
@micksmith-vt5yi11 ай бұрын
lol i had to laugh when they used Australia invention Nulka in season 4. it does not give off the a picture like that when used. Yes it does confuse a missile to think it is the ship in a radar signature bigger then the ship but not like that.
@jamiedriscoll978129 күн бұрын
3:42 do you guys understand scale? 😅 had no idea Europe was 14 miles away
@davidsyes597010 ай бұрын
As mentioned elsewhere, the DDG-51s do not have diesels. Reportedly, the Australian Air Warfare Destroyer, the UK Daring, and the Spanish licensed Aegis Frigate have diesels. Note that the USN has 3 Allison family of generators bought out by Rolls Royce/Rolls-Royce, but only two are operational at any given time. One provides power, and a 2nd is on hot standby or for load balancing, and other reasons (I wasn't an EM, EN, FN, GSE, GSM, or other; I was a Radioman aboard an FFG-7 (FRG-19) ship which does (it still exists, in the Turkish Navy, Gediz, Hull 497) have 2 GE LM2500s and IIRC 2 diesel generators, on forward and one near the Main Engine Room, which I did visit once or twice. I had access to many spaces while working towards my ESWS Pin, but also separate from that had eventually been in almost every space aboard that ship, even in the space between the LM2500 uptakes, the air intake housing when our 2 engines were replaced, the Mk 13 missile space, one of the two diesel rooms, supply, and the VCHT spaces, as well as the COs, the XOs cabins, and some of those of the officers. I didn't go into the Engineers Enlisted Berthing as they were fiercely territorial more than Ops and Deck. The political design choices foisted onto the Navy if it wanted funding for the Burkes was the 51s had to be AT LEAST 50 feet shorter than the Ticos/Spruances. (The Ticos, due to mass/displacement picked up a wet foredeck/foc'sle, so bulwarks had ro be added, increasing the ship's length by about 4 feet over that of the parent hull, the Spruance Class . So, ~503 feet the Flight 1 became. That forced the removal of one of the two watertight compartment separation between the 2 main engine rooms, shortened the ship, made her a wide, fuel-guzzling hog, and forced the Navy to ask GE to up the per-engine SHP so the 51s would be able to keep up with the Bird Farms. Such political imposing prevented the Navy from being able to in the future make use of the Northrop Grumman AHDS, which was conceived of in the mid 1970, to be what the Navy around 2016 or so tried to implement to desperately reign in the DDG-51 fuel consumption. The 51 could fit only ONE, not the envisaged 2 to 4 units. So, without a real redundancy due to sheer lack of space without cutting or removing something, it was probably pointless to proceed. So, no AHDS for th others of the class in any flight up to 2A. One GTG is forward of the fwd engine room, one is in MER 2, and one is aft in the Generator Room. When two run, one is off, in standby, or undergoing maintenance. For bus loading/frequency/voltage/transmission line capabilities/myriad reasons, you'll probably never have all three running at once. This seems to be physica, as IIUC, the online genny counts limit applies to other navies as well depending on the gennies chosen, power capability, redundancy, switchboard, and control systems, and much much more. Sadly, when one of the two Burke destroyers that made contact with merchants off Japan (or, this may actually be related to the COLE), the jolt was so hard that the ship lost all power for several minutes across the two running gens. IIUC, the loss of power killed the ability to pump fuel to aft where the one working genny was physically operable. So, a bucket brigade or a hose brigade was needed. Fire hoses are not rated for fuel transfer, so... This is not first-hand information. It's either in the NTSB reports or elsewhere in trade/industry papers. Happy Hunting (for info)!
@FunkyMunkey00_8 ай бұрын
10:47 Love how you explained the difference
@RobMcGinley8111 ай бұрын
Major error on the MK 45 Gun section. No USN ships have an "automated ammunition shuttle" The rounds are hand loaded into the lower hoist from bulk storage (or straight into the loader drum if the magazine is on the same deck such as the rear gun on the Ticonderoga's). The RN, RAN and RCN will have such a system when their type 26 (or derivatives) come on line but this seems a waste of weight,ones and maintenance to me as an former operator maintainer of the MK 45
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Thanks for your feedback and your Service 👍🏻
@davidh437410 ай бұрын
What do you do now? What learning resources would you recommend for learning more about MK 45 from the operator's perspective?
@johnsmith1953x11 ай бұрын
*@**3:44**, LOL! Thats one HELLUVA gun!!*
@grandadslifehacks89923 ай бұрын
What a great video. The animation brings everything to life.
@teresaponziani16125 күн бұрын
Excellent video and commentary! Thanks!
@RobertMattison-w4p11 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing this on KZbin.
@laurencehugo591011 ай бұрын
Excellent summary and discription, thanks.
@NLozar2211 ай бұрын
SPG-62 radars don't spin around like that. They are not search radars, they are target illumination radars (kind of the exact opposite). On Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, the role of the search radar falls on four SPY-1 (or SPY-6 in case of Flight III ships) solid state electronically steered phased array S-band radars placed around vessel's superstructure giving the ship 360 degree real time radar cover with each SPY-1 array capable of tracking and engaging 100 targets in real time (based on official unclassified information. The true number is almost certainly at least twice that and most likely still much higher), with SPY-6 array reported being 30 times more sensitive (note that this doesn't necessarily mean capable of engaging more targets). Being S-band radars gives them excellent range but insufficient resolution to accurately guide semi-active radar-guided missiles (such as SM-2 and ESSM Block 1) in their terminal phase (last few seconds before impacting the target) which requires X-band. This is where SPG-62 radars come into play. When SM-2 or ESSM Block 1 enter their terminal phase, SPG-62 antenna will illuminate their target with a narrow X-band beam giving the missiles highest possible radar resolution. Once target has been destroyed, the SPG-62 antenna may point to another target, but will most certainly not be spinning like a search radar. This is why there are three of them on each Burke and four on each Tico-cruiser. Good job with the animation and 3d modeling by the way.
@f.miller80111 ай бұрын
Man this is great
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Thanks Miller 😌
@lockheedx3313 күн бұрын
7:21 My dad, a US Navy veteran, had told me something interesting about the frigates. They're designed to distract the enemy and be sunk in order to divert attention from more important ships, such as aircraft carriers.
@danielhandika876711 ай бұрын
Bit slower please, take it easy, quality over quantity ok? Make a few high quality and accurate videos instead of ramping up lots of videos at short periods
@DavidVerbout11 ай бұрын
Why slower? You cannot keep up? The video is already six minutes longer than necessary
@terminallydrunk190011 ай бұрын
Should of stayed in school dood
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Noted 🙂
@ducoh209311 ай бұрын
dont bother it was a great video only the 24 km was a bit messy but it was very appreciated still!@@Aitelly
@siddharthshekhar90911 ай бұрын
@@Aitellythe frequency and the quality of the videos is excellent. I enjoyed it. Don't bother with such complaints. Please make a video about a submarine hunter and long range maritime surveillance aircraft like the Poseidon P8.
@TylerX55311 ай бұрын
I love these animations of how things work and happen, keep up the great work!!
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Thanks! new video on the Aircraft Carrier coming soon.
@SSO1025RET8 ай бұрын
Hey, great video. I know something like this takes a lot of work so thank you. Other than your annunciation on a couple of things, I give you a two thumbs up.
@tylerbenrich7 ай бұрын
I like how when it says the shell can travel 14 miles then shows the entire Atlantic Ocean 😂
@okancanarslan373011 ай бұрын
Its impressive how battleships evolved from behemoths full of cannons to high tech streamlined missile carrriers.
@drksideofthewal11 ай бұрын
It really is. A fight between modern warships is less of a slugging match, and more of a “wizards duel.”
@ToddRainer-j4d10 ай бұрын
Battleships didn't evolve like that. Battleships were decommissioned. Often turned into Museums.
@mudhutproductions11 ай бұрын
Amigo, Forecastle is not pronounced four castle, it's pronounced foke sel.
@mapex197610 ай бұрын
And Frigate is pronounced frig-it not frig at! 🤣
@horationelson184010 ай бұрын
It is pronounced that way today, yes. However at one time it was indeed pronounced how it’s spelt. Over time it was shortened to the pronunciation we know today.
@mapex197610 ай бұрын
@@horationelson1840 Well today is today!
@MinionInc3 ай бұрын
Bro, I just want to say: NEVER STOP MAKING THESE.
@killer2.024911 ай бұрын
beautiful explanation of warship...i love your video bro...keep doing.❤
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Thanks 👍🏻 will keep on producing more videos
@ralfhtg10563 ай бұрын
Huge thank you for including metric units!
@Whycantiputmyname3 ай бұрын
The Russian spy watching this video
@jadenbiyo73653 ай бұрын
I really wasted my time in the US huh?
@johnblackhead23843 ай бұрын
You act like they don’t already know.
@BNSailor3 ай бұрын
@whycantiputmyname The knows more than this video
@duytruong1157Ай бұрын
@@Whycantiputmyname probably they had completed drawings and specifications from CCP
@stonecold6385Ай бұрын
They aren't giving away anything. I commissioned the USS Roosevelt DDG-80. I was a Firecontrolman 1st class. Pretty much everything in the video is very basic info.
@FaithBasedProductions11 ай бұрын
i love how great you portray the ship, 900 school bus's!! and even a mighty ship such as this, is a drop in the ocean compared to some of the WW2 era superheavy battleships, most of which no longer exist
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Yes Agreed 👍🏻
@walthampton670011 ай бұрын
Love it, thank you for first class content!!
@blurglide11 ай бұрын
The guidance section IS the autopilot. The section behind it is the warhead. The booster is not the sustainer Mach 3.5 is a speed, not a range
@hellomymensinghvlog54411 ай бұрын
I like your videos very much. I watch your videos from Bangladesh
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Thank you so much 😀
@saleh682011 ай бұрын
Good Animation.Thank You Very Much.
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Always Welcome 🙏🏻🙂
@johnsilver933811 ай бұрын
You forgot SM-2 and ESSM. So Aegis Burke destroyers has 4 layers of air defense. SM-6 -> SM-2 -> ESSM -> CIWS either Phalanx or SeaRAM. If it carries SM-3 it has another layer of air defense against ballistic missiles. Also Mk41 VLS is not a hot launch system only but a housing for either hot or cold launch missile canisters. Lastly, Harpoon follows a sea-skimming trajectory not a parabolic path. And only Flight I/II use Harpoon.
@micksmith-vt5yi11 ай бұрын
Lol you forgot Nulka a Australian invention as a defense system. USS Mason uses it against Houthis and funny some stories say the missile mysteriously falls in to the sea as a malfunction.
@muhammadhuzaifaazam11 ай бұрын
You guys are getting quite good views on this btw. Nicely done
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Thanks 👍🏻😊 We love you guys. Even better videos coming in 2 weeks
@raytherrien285111 ай бұрын
AWESOME VIDEO MAN!
@sherwynd191111 ай бұрын
3:45 that's not 24 kilometres, it's more like several thousand kilometres
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Our Animator Got a A little too Excited. Apologies for the Graphics
@user-op8fg3ny3j11 ай бұрын
@@Aitelly I was like, wow that ship can hit any continent 🤣
@nothernstar257611 ай бұрын
also, Germany is missing from the map
@danielchen117811 ай бұрын
I was mistaken the earth for little prince's home, asteroid B612
@EarthGaming1932 ай бұрын
5 thousand and some
@dnx33111 ай бұрын
always great animation !!
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Great
@edcodos371211 ай бұрын
Good video, greetings from Colombia.
@sandroetn690711 ай бұрын
Wow I Love this youtube than any channel. Best Wishes from India 🇮🇳 Karnataka ❤
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
I love Bangalore one of my friends is from that state. I had a great time down there
@TrusePkay11 ай бұрын
The most detailed animation of a US aleigh-burke class destroyer.
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
You are Awesome 👍🏻😎
@bolanlebalogun911 ай бұрын
Thank you for this amazing video
@demorrobinson2105 ай бұрын
Seeing this I couldn’t believe it wow they really shoot that far ain’t no way 😀✨3:40
@dododostenfiftyseven409611 ай бұрын
3:40 the biggest “not to scale” I’ve ever seen
@bobkile973410 ай бұрын
Another inaccuracy, most Arleigh Burke class destroyers don’t have SeaRAM launchers. As far as i can tell, only 4 ships have them. The rest just have the CIWS guns. Another thing, those 3 dishes you have rotating in the animation…they don’t do that. Those are for locking onto targets. They will turn towards a target, and “paint” it for a missile.
@AchwaqKhalid11 ай бұрын
3:45 lol that exaggerated 24km radius 😮
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Apologies from the Animator
@LonDanDoc10 ай бұрын
Hey dude. Great work . Nice animations. How do you produce these animations so quickly. I want to teach some students using animations but it seems long and time consuming
@JohanMsWorld8 ай бұрын
Both Virgina and the destroyer has active and passive Sonar systems as far as I know. The submarine prephere to use pasive systems more often but both have them.
@paul850393 ай бұрын
Love your videos.
@FlordosAçores6 ай бұрын
Thank You USA Navy!
@myhalflifecrisis11 ай бұрын
Great video! Being a Destroyer Sailor myself, your depictions are very good. Not fully accurate, but I rather not tell you the corrections because I want my Shipmates to remain safer out to sea. The bad guys are watching and learning, we like to stay a lot of steps ahead.
@haroldbalzer591610 ай бұрын
Lol right I seen the interior depictions and thought well that's completely wrong.
@HMTOlympic515111 ай бұрын
I love Arleigh Burke Destroyers and amazing video ❤❤❤
@fiddleriddlediddlediddle6 ай бұрын
The Atlantic ocean really is massive. I don't think I could swim 24km.
@boshirahamed568 ай бұрын
Man the Collosal Titan was that small...RIP Rumbling in front of Modern world 👏🏻
@nextechsolutions595511 ай бұрын
Please review the Frigate and Cruiser as well.
@shannonpace943310 ай бұрын
No diesel generators. I've built the intakes for the generators on about 20 DDG's built at Ingalls Shipbuilding in Pascagoula Mississippi.
@WilliamLangmeur-em1xo8 ай бұрын
You have a new subscriber.
@johnblackhead23843 ай бұрын
I was stationed on one of those for 3 years. They suck. The last thing the designers thought about was E-6 and below crew comfort. E-7 and above had fantastic accommodations. I was on a Spruance class destroyer in the 80s. The crew had 100% better comfort.
@faustopina66392 ай бұрын
Very good Engineering.
@schlirf11 ай бұрын
Navy guys, a question: Do you collect the expended brass from the 5 inch or just kick it over the side? Reasoning: with the 105mm tanks we used to reprocess the brass for future tank rounds.
@kingdedede106611 ай бұрын
Push it over the side
@curtisophillipsjr37811 ай бұрын
We made ash trays out of them in my day. 1977-82
@schlirf11 ай бұрын
@@curtisophillipsjr378 Same with the Tankers.
@jamieklettke506111 ай бұрын
@curtisophillipsjr378 we still do today as well. The problem is the hardened metal is really hard on the lathe
@combatseawolf11 ай бұрын
@@curtisophillipsjr378same here even today we have two empty 5in brass as ashtrays in our smoke deck
@jimtincher73579 ай бұрын
Combat decisions occurs in CIC (Combat Information Center) and not the bridge, that's where they drive the ship from... this ship fights from CIC.
@waynegood92332 ай бұрын
from 1968-1971 I was a radarmen on USS DD=725 and DD-692 World war 2 destroyers
@Talven8111 ай бұрын
Wow, our artillery range has expanded a lot...and the Atlantic shrunk. 3:44
@Talven8111 ай бұрын
Good job now I can't stop. Let's delve in, sounded like let's tell them. Sus-tainer, mak 3.5, fuh-laynks... Please learn to pronounce these things.
@chaturakarpe989710 ай бұрын
Pls put a video on ticonderoga class destroyer.
@kennethhammond402811 ай бұрын
Informative and entertaining 😅
@paul850393 ай бұрын
It says that it ejects the spent casing out through the side of the gun when it shows the full projectile being ejected over the top of the barrel.
@rmarsh33099 ай бұрын
I've seen this channel before. It was called Animagraffs and it was much, much better.
@figvam23499 ай бұрын
This DESTROYER you talking about is a set of pixels from this very game. 😁😁😁
@ErnestJay8811 ай бұрын
During WWI and WWII, Destroyer only purpose are "Protect Cruiser and Battleship from Submarine and Air Attack" Modern Destroyer is a "Battleship" that didn't need huge caliber naval gun.
@croskerk11 ай бұрын
That cab also act as escorts and fleet protection. US Destroyers do be jack of all trades
@PBScourge11 ай бұрын
Good video, but I have a minor nitpick. You confuse weight and displacement. (Many people do…) Your video states that the Arleigh Burke class weighs around 9500 tons. In fact, that’s the ship’s displacement. If memory serves, the vessel’s dead weight is closer to 3000 tons. Excellent animation. Hope to see more.
@brianb-p658610 ай бұрын
The actual displacement is the gross weight; the weight of water displaced by the hull of the ship equals the weight of the ship, which is how buoyancy works. That's gross weight (the standard term in loaded displacement), meaning the ship and its contents.. so perhaps you think "weight" should only mean the bare hull, or the ship in sailing condition (with engines, for instance) but with no other equipment installed? 3,000 tons sounds plausible before fitting with everything that makes it a destroyer... what may be called Light Displacement or LDT. The video is describing a functioning destroyer, not an empty cargo ship.
@StarBuck41111 ай бұрын
Pronunciation on Phalanx, Frigate. Searam is a longer range defense system than the phalanx, not what you imply. Previoustly stated your range circles for the Mark 45 gun is pretty bad.
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Yes agreed 👍🏻
@benchurchill97356 ай бұрын
The Atlantic Ocean is 26 miles from NY to London. That's why the marathon was invented. The British troops ran home after the 3rd Revolutionary War in 1989. During this time they were facing heavy bombardment from the USS Olympic. That's why we also have the Olympics.
@Harldin6 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@sankaranarayanan872211 ай бұрын
Hi bro...1st comment..❤
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Awesome bro
@JaloliddinAbdumannonov-h6s11 ай бұрын
I am biggest fan of this channel . I watch it all the time .Don't stop. We are waiting new videos I am watching from uzbekistan 🫡🇺🇿
@mrfarenheit915913 күн бұрын
FYI, the principle unit of measure of distance in the Navy is nautical miles, not kilometers. Gun ranges are give in thousands of yards, as 2 thousands yards is approximately a nautical mile. The max range of a “5 inch gun” is 14,000 yards.
@SayantanMondal-zi6rv11 ай бұрын
Please do a video on INDIAN Destroyers....❤❤❤😊😊😊...other than that love 💕 your videos..😊😊❤❤
@agussonjaya763511 ай бұрын
Next kirov class ship sir!!
@blueneptune-u8z2 ай бұрын
Awesome you should do a report on the Argo ship that saved the Humans and traveled to Iskandar
@TheKrighter10 ай бұрын
The CIWS fires before the rolling airframe missiles?
@jakebrod711 ай бұрын
Bow and stem are not necessarily interchangeable. Stem refers to the very front of the vessel whereas bow is more the general area. The part you animated as forecastle should’ve been the bow. Also there’s really no forecastle on a destroyer
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Thanks for your feedback
@sedeckk.712611 ай бұрын
Do Virgin Galactic spaceship systems next
@chrisnyenya523311 ай бұрын
24 kilometer radius, seems the world is a village indeed
@Aitelly11 ай бұрын
Apologies our new Animator got a little bit excited on this project
@elijahtucker793810 ай бұрын
@@Aitelly You keep saying "new animator". Do you not fact check stuff?
@nolanbowen88007 ай бұрын
Thank you. This is interesting and scary for our enemies.
@robertmosher74182 ай бұрын
Its a good guess on the different spaces inside the ship. The dimensions are incorrect. And the Mark 45 gun is just about done. The rounds are so powerful that it is cost prohibitive to shoot. They can't afford to fire such a powerful round or they would need to continually replace the barrel because they wear out rather quickly and reducing the charge or replace the gun with a less powerful one would only reduce the ability to provide land forces the accurate indirect fire support that it was designed for and after the ammunition has been completely depleated the Navy plans on replacing the gun with another missle firing position on the ship. Or so I was told by a Navy vet who was recently honorably discharged from one of them. It is open source information and I learned his info when I commented that they could no longer find anyone to produce the ammunition because of the cost. I got that backwards as it is the gun not the ammo that made that created the issue.
@vipondiu11 ай бұрын
3:40 This was so out of scale that Germany left the chat
@nicholasromeo16812 күн бұрын
I maybe to old but does anyone else get the vibe that this content was artificially generated by ai??