How Were the Polls So Wrong About Trump?

[@ClydeB1]

Because they were partisan and not reporting the reality of the situation, maybe? 😂

[@raulandreshernandezdelaros6203]

Exactly. I'd also add that Trump voters are less likely to respond to pollsters

[@xxyyzz8464]

No, because even the most right-leaning polls underestimate him. The simpler explanation that fits the facts is Trump has a larger number of supporters who would never answer the phone or respond to a poll than your typical Dem, so all polls suffer from what is called “sample bias” which is not a political leaning bias, but is a reflection of your stupidity in not being able to statistically sample the populations appropriately. They needed to account for and correct for this bias, but it’s more work so these lazy pollsters never did that and just continued with their inaccurate methods.

[@pleasantjourneys]

It's not about Mr Trump - The citizens are reflecting their condition 😢

[@royprovins7037]

How can Luntz make a living being wrong all the time

[@vbs7953]

My condolences to Bloomberg staff

[@MichaelRodrigues-n7t]

Nice wig

[@aman101112]

The elites finding a reason to justify their errors :)

[@joemarcklinger724]

Garbage does not poll well.

[@Ratt611]

Because they were grade A bull$hit

[@smithb0134]

The Iowa poll was an outlier, not a trend any pollster worth his salt could see that. The fact that media latched on to that as a sign of some sort of Kamala sweep is so absurb. If a New York poll a week before the election had Trump over Kamala by 3 points, would they have pushed that? Of course not. It would be seen as just what it is, an outlier and nothing more.

[@Jack-qx1ld]

Wow, biggest surprise of the century. Who could have predicted that this may not have been 50/50.

[@xxyyzz8464]

She won the debate, but that didn’t matter. Winning the election is what matters.

[@DarkLordJmac]

Did she win the debate? I dont remember it going that way at all

[@jethroabel4802]

Because you guys literally live in your own universe and you're against the grain of it

[@StormyCalm]

Frank Lutz doesn't know what the votes want to see and hear. So...what value does his interpretation have?

[@geoffl]

lol, she was installed. She's a horrible politician.

[@Agtsmirnoff]

Ann Selzer should never be taken seriously again

[@KimberleyRiley-n1z]

Right on! I'm glad to hear someone speaking the truth! So right!

[@RichardKing-sx6xc]

🙋🍊😆😂😅🤣