Hull Vane - Fuel Saving Foils

[@MrLarsson92]

Clever! :) I've been seeing quite many inventions in the boat industy lately to help reduce emissions. Very good to see!

[@kentash4987]

Great Innovation...sharply lowers Fuel Cost, Maintenance, OPEX and GHG Emmissions! Congratulations...👍

[@DavidSamuel-s7s]

Wow, 12-14% is HUGE savings for something so relatively simple.. Great Innovation...sharply lowers Fuel Cost, Maintenance, OPEX and GHG Emmissions! Congratulations....

[@grahampalmer9337]

From a Wiki article on WW2 German Schnellboot: - Small rudders added on either side of the main rudder could be angled outboard to 30 degrees, creating at high speed what is known as the Lürssen Effect.[5] This drew in an "air pocket slightly behind the three propellers, increasing their efficiency, reducing the stern wave and keeping the boat at a nearly horizontal attitude".[6] This was an important innovation as the horizontal attitude lifted the stern somewhat, allowing even greater speed, and the reduced stern wave made E-boats harder to see, especially at night

[@yelectric1893]

very cool technology

[@crouchingwombathiddenquoll5641]

Clever people

[@hullvanebv2550]

Lürssen effect is very different (more like a pair of vertical adjustable trim tabs): www.modelwarships.com/reviews/ships/dkm/s-boat/s-100-72/72-S-100-p2.htm

[@welshpete12]

Interesting !

[@dontaskme9047]

>This drew in an "air pocket This sounds dubious. I would not be surprised if this was counterintelligence by Germany to subvert foreign boat designs.

[@colingrant321]

Firstly, I love this tech. I don't have a degree in hydrodynamics, but I did once pick apart and disprove the work of a PHD in Hydrodynamics. Just because fun, and his work was messing with my mechanical design. Q&A: Any of these systems have variable AOA, for the purposes of and not limited to: fine tuning to an existing vessel, variable for power setting, vessel speed, sea state, other. Also variable positioning up/down, for/aft for same reasons. Also any option for one on the back of a dive boat with active hydraulics for mitigating aft deck pitching! After a scuba dive, It's no fun trying to board a ladder pitching past you a couple of vertical meters.

[@hullvanebv2550]

We are working on an active version (Dynamic Hull Vane), but the AOA is mainly a function of hull shape, and therefore not very speed-dependent. The purpose is to vary the AOA to vary the lift, and therefore increase pitch damping.

[@Puckgrinder85]

Wow, 12-14% is HUGE savings for something so relatively simple.

[@VicTor-gi7so]

imagine supplimenting with sail . BAM..done 20 -50% savings

[@shirleymae30]

They should be made in a more of a swept wing shape, in order to hopefully freely dislodge any rope, buoys, kelp, or other floating debris that could otherwise get entangled in the vane.

[@potatoraider7320]

Swept wings makes it even more efficient... you can get rid of the wing tip turbulence.

[@victormarchesoni2482]

lol I love KZbin comments. So expert

[@hullvanebv2550]

Some of our Hull Vanes have a swept wing indeed. What you see in the video (5 years old) is the very basic TT-shaped configuration. Floating debris has never been an issue as the water coming over the Hull Vane has passed through the propellers and over the rudders first.

[@shirleymae30]

I am a former Maine lobsterman, our waters are like an obstacle course. LOL.

[@markrobertson4320]

shirleymae30 you ain’t seen nothing till you go to Asia !!!

[@shirleymae30]

FYI, the term you are searching for at #3 at about the 3:00 min. mark is called "Squat", and is what the hull vane is actually compensating for, or correcting.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Squat is especially important in shallow water, and yes the Hull Vane is effective against squatting due to the large vertical force developed at a low speed already. But the effect is much more than that (e.g. forward thrust, wave reduction), and we hope the video illustrates that.

[@tilmaen]

Would it make sense to retrofit a sailing yacht with a wing? One couldn't install it to far aft, though (marinas, docking,...). Im aware that there are foils for sailing yachts, but they are advanced to manage, expensive and hard to retrofit.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Yes, it can make sense, but it depends of the sailing yacht's shape, displacement and speed. Just the optimisation is often already too expensive. Payback period is hard to achieve when you don't consume fuel...

[@seadog686]

@@hullvanebv2550 But consider all that wind we'd be conserving for those blowhard politicians!

[@quillmaurer6563]

Cool idea! A while after watching this video it crossed my mind that maybe something similar, though upside-down, could be applied to my car. I have a VW Bug, which has a steeply sloping rear end, which causes a lot of drag as the air flows down along it. A wing placed at the right angle and position in this flow, redirecting it toward the rear, might have a net thrust force, countering some of this drag and improving fuel economy. Would also provide some downforce, a secondary benefit (I'm not a racer) of making the car feel a little more solid at freeway speed. Probably not as much downforce as the lift the car generates, but to make more would add drag, the primary goal being fuel economy, not lap times. Somewhat related to the downforce wings racecars have, I see it as sort of combining that idea and this "hull vane," though said wings redirect horizontal air upward to generate a lot of downforce, plus drag, while this would redirect downward flow to horizontal, gaining thrust and some downforce. Two challenges I see are that this would place a low-pressure area near the engine cooling air intakes, which would make the engine run hot, and also I'd have no idea how to determine the optimal position, angle, airfoil shape, and size without either a wind tunnel or very sophisticated CFD, neither of which I have access to.

[@Bryn0x]

Hi Quill, a very good idea, and there are indeed car spoilers (wings) which produce a net forward thrust as they are positioned in a downward flow of air. This is the reason why the Hull Vane is sometimes called an "inverted underwater spoiler".

[@morrisgoldin4362]

I had the same idea for a boat I’m remodeling, love the research behind this too

[@timotheekoehl2669]

Hi ! I think there is a mistake at 2:14. FX is opposed to the way of the ship (resistance must be backward), isn't it ? Thank you to tell me if I'm right or wrong so that I can understand.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hi Timothée, it's not a mistake. This Fx is pointing forward and pushes the vessel. Where this forward force comes from is explained more clearly in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/a2erp4FrZpZnirs . The point is that even though drag is pointing along with the flow, and lift perpendical with the flow, the resultant of lift and drag can still be angled forward, and therefore have a net positive Fx in horizontal direction.

[@timotheekoehl2669]

@@hullvanebv2550 Thank you for your answer ! I'll check this out !

[@timotheekoehl2669]

@@hullvanebv2550 Let me please introduce myself : I'm a french student in a engineering school specialized in see technology called SeaTech. I'm mostly interested in renewable energies and ways to reduce our impact on the environment, and I am currently searching an internship. Is it possible to explain you my motivations in a mail, and send you my CV and cover letter ? Thank you to let me know !

[@hullvanebv2550]

@@timotheekoehl2669 Hi Thimothée, yes you can find our contact details on www.hullvane.com

[@BilgePump]

Whats the trade off between the effectiveness of the design and the added drag?

[@sinisterfire6641]

That's what's he is saying. The vane reduces drag

[@jamesbutson6347]

Bilge Pump the size of the wing in comparison to the amount of hill lifted out of the water favours the wing.

[@IamNothing82]

Im wondering if you can add something on a kayak to make it faster or to use less energy.

[@ianmoone2359]

There is no potential application to smaller outboard powered vessels / trailerable craft? The vane has to be positioned behind the propellers? Can it work with surface piercing propellers? Sorry for the 101 questions, just trying to wrap my head around this interesting concept! 👍

[@Im-mv6bf]

there have been outboard cavitation plates for years that do the exact same thing.... i dont believe it has to be mounted behind the propellers because this is controling the water coming out from under the boat, not from the point of thrust

[@hullvanebv2550]

Outboard powered vessels are usually planing boats, and boats with surface piercing propellers most certainly are. There are other foil solutions for such high speed-to-length ratio vessels. Hull Vane is for semi-displacement and displacement boats.

[@rasataplanta]

Positive thrust????? As the lift increase also the drag increase? Please show a complete schemes of forces

[@hullvanebv2550]

Check this one for the scheme of forces: kzbin.info/www/bejne/a2erp4FrZpZnirs

[@solstar4778]

What about hull stablerzers with the hull vain essentially lifting the whole hull and less in the water computerly controlled for smooth cruising ?

[@hullvanebv2550]

There is no effect on the stabilizers, the Hull Vane only lifts the hull by 6 cm.

[@tertiuspretorius2045]

I read that this concept has been install on a catamaran initially,there is not much review on the results of this attempt, i am interested in this concept mainly to sail under low wind and to keep the bow out the water for increased speed,can you shed some light on this?

[@anthonyxuereb792]

Remember the winged keel developed in Holland with Australian Ben Lexan for the America's cup winner

[@LowesRegar1995]

where can i find any journal about this hull vane ? thank you

[@paulmahy]

You can't.it's bollocks.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Go to www.hullvane.com and click on Publications. Or go to www.vanoossanenacademy.nl and click on "papers and publications"

[@ronnieince4568]

Is this still effective when you have two propellers one behind the other on the same shaft that raises propeller efficiency from 60% to 80% .If both can be combined the potential for fuel saving is hugely increased .

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hi Ronnie, yes the Hull Vane would still be effective. Counter-rotating propellers recover energy from the rotation of the propeller flow. Hull Vane recovers energy from the "rotation" (or rather upward flow) given by the ship's hull to the water.

[@rayologyxm]

Nice idea. It's literally rear car spoiler that's upside down.

[@jamesbutson6347]

Interesting to see this application coming to commercial vessels. How similar is it to the wing on the Porsche designed yacht?

[@hullvanebv2550]

It's the same thing. The Dynamiq GTT115 has a Hull Vane.

[@thomateish]

Would this be of any interest on a 42ft sailboat?

[@jthepickle7]

Sail craft do not move fast enough to achieve the desired effect.

[@compassft]

How much lift, as a percentage of the ship displacement, is generated by the Hull Vane? Is it the same percentage as the reduced resistance (or required power) you show in the video (12%)? Thank you

[@hullvanebv2550]

This depends a lot of the ship. It can go up to 10%, but on the vessel in the video it is less than 5%.

[@paulmahy]

As for trimming the vessel, that's what ballast tanks are for. No moving parts means it will be giving lift when it's not desirable and I wonder if they would break away in a serious storm and in so doing damage the ships structure possibly causing a hull breach?

[@hullvanebv2550]

In an accumulated 33 years of operational use so far, not a single damage or repair. The forces can be calculated accurately, and the Hull Vane is designed for it. Rudders don't fall off ships anymore either.

[@paulmahy]

I have been at sea for 40 years, tankers, box boats, trampers, coasters, north sea standby and fast rescue, I have never seen one in all this time and not one naval architect, captain, engineer has ever mentioned one. I flew commercial hydrofoils in the 80s so fully understand the principle. Send me a list of these ships that have had them for 33 years so I can research them. Until then this looks like and sounds like crap.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hi Paul, if you send an email to our general email address, I will happily reply with a list of installations and year of installation, on which the 33 years is based,

[@paulmahy]

Nope. Post the list on here for all to see.

[@saltysteel3996]

Cool invention that actually works. It is weird to think about though. Seems like it wouldn't work because it adds more weight to the vessel and anything below the water line will add more drag no matter how hydrodynamic it is. But the data does not lie, it does work.

[@hullvanebv2550]

There are many things that take up space and weight and still reduce drag by improving hydro- or aerodynamics. Bulbous bows on ships, corner vanes on trucks, wingtips on aircraught wings, shaped helmets on time-trial cyclists, to name a few.

[@andre-jm8jn]

What about the added skin drag of the foil itself?

[@hullvanebv2550]

Certainly not negligible. It's a tradeoff: there's a small penalty on frictional drag for a big gain on pressure (or wavemaking) drag. That's why the Hull Vane doesn't work on ships that have only frictional drag.

[@advyachts]

We are planning to integrate this system on our boats soon

[@hullvanebv2550]

We look forward to hear from you then!

[@jackburgoyne918]

What happens if someone falls overboard?

[@AircraftMechanic-AP]

Jack Burgoyne the rest of the crew waves as the person drowns in the distance

[@21mozzie]

That's a myth. The person usually dissapears before everybody has time to get on deck to wave goodbye.

[@arclight4668]

a good thing to do is not fall off the boat

[@HermitianAdjoint]

With the added stability of the hull vane the rest of the crew has an easier time to get on deck to wave goodbye.

[@RedMac63]

The same as always happens you get wet .

[@DoubleUp9999]

Will this Hull came applicable to a sailboat? What are extreme side effects if applied to a sailboat?

[@FooFahFoeFum]

Have you tried this hull vane on yachts in the 125 meter length . I'm talking about yachts that already can travel at top speeds of 40 knots.

[@peterdarr383]

It's not for planing hulls.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hi, no we haven't. Which 125m yacht can go at 40 knots? The cliosest to what you describe would be the Freedom class LCS of the US Navy (115 m / 47 knots).

[@brotherbryan2414]

What is o.2....? How many knots Is that? Would it work on the catamaran?

[@ramimlamnun9452]

I was Ch Officer of a 100m long coastal tanker, max draft 6.0m. When fully loaded i kept a 0.5 -1.0m trim by the stern. Sea speed about 11.0 knots. Contrary to what was shown in the video, at sea speed my vessel takes a trim by the bow, even with initial static trim of 0.5 - 1.0m by the stern. When my ship moves ahead at sea, rain water and sea water on deck would flow forward towards the bow. When the vessel reduces speed on arrival port, the water flowed aft. Perhaps this aspect needs to be studied further. With the hull vane fitted, i presume the ship will be trimmed more by the head when moving at sea, lowering the bow height above water.

[@kamenriderblade2099]

Would this be useful on large big ships like an Aircraft Carrier for the US Navy or their new Zumwalt Class ships?

[@hullvanebv2550]

Definitely! In addition to saving fuel, increasing range and top speed, there are interesting side benefits. An aircraft carrier becomes useless when it reaches a certain pitching angle, so reducing the pitch excitation is extremely valuable. Both vessels would also benefit enormously from the visual and acoustic signature reduction.

[@kamenriderblade2099]

If a person fell off the deck and landed on top of the hull vane while plunging through the water and sank and landed on the hull vane, would they damage it? Is it sturdy enough to take the weight of a person falling on top of it from the height of a Aircraft Carrier deck while plunging through the water?

[@kamenriderblade2099]

If you combine this with a Tumblehome design, would it result in less pitching angle?

[@hullvanebv2550]

The plating on the Hull Vane on such a ship is more than 20 mm thick. I'd be more worried about damage to the person than to the Hull Vane. But apart from the struts, it's a couple of meters below water, so even that is unlikely. Better not to fall off the deck of an aircraught carrier though, you could drown in the aerated water behind the transom, which gives much less buoyancy than normal water.

[@hullvanebv2550]

The Hull Vane results in less pitching angle, regardless of whether the ship has a tumblehome design or not. Anything you add under water is good for seakeeping, it's just that most things also have a drag penalty. For Hull Vane, it's the opposite.

[@waynep343]

if you have a vessel that does a lot of pitching where it operates.. you might want to create a one of your wings that has hinges close to the front edge and can be remotely unlocked on the rear.. this can create forward thrust from the pitching. why dampen it totally when you can use pitching to add thrust. it won't work on vessels that don't have enough pitch during normal operation but some.. there was a study about 25 years ago .. about a sailing hull with a design that had a lot of pitching designed in with hinged wings to create forward thrust.. somebody designed a reversing pitch blade to use with air boxes over swells allowing the change in airflow to spin small generators in the same direction no matter which way the air was flowing thru the fan..

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hi Wayne, good ideas, but as is often the case with good ideas, it has been thought of. We have a version which hinges and has an actuator for additional pitch dampening, called Dynamic Hull Vane. Pitching causes a lot of added resistance, so you generally want to reduce it as much as possible. The (passive) Hull Vane generates forward thrust out of the pitching motions through something we call "the pumping effect", similar to what surfers do on hydrofoil surfboards. The Hull Vane converts both the stern wave and the ship motions into forward thrust, making the ship quieter, more efficient and more comfortable.

[@00Mass00]

Would it work on Fishing vessels at speeds of around 5kn? it would be benefitial since the maximum power allowed for fishing vessels is restricted. (but the regulation dating from 1975 never took the shape of the ship into account) If this can help the fishing vessel reach the ideal 'fishing speed' at around 4.5- 5.5 knots, combined with better fuel efficiency and stability that would be very interesting.

[@hullvanebv2550]

What is the length of those fishing vessels?

[@00Mass00]

@@hullvanebv2550 24m but I saw on the website that the vane works from 8kn so they might go too slow for that.

[@ripemm5737]

How will it work on my 21 footer

[@paparayg]

I wonder if this would work on a 50 foot monohull sailboat?

[@hullvanebv2550]

Theoretically it could, but it may be cost-prohibitive compared to the benefits (relatively small speed gain on such vessel, higher pointing and better seakeeping). Modern racing yachts (where cost is less of an issue) are too fast for Hull Vane (planing and even foiling hulls).

[@capt.craiglehrke4395]

@@hullvanebv2550 what do you consider to be a small speed gain? On a heavy displacement cruising boat that sails at 8-10 knots a "small" gain of one knot is indeed significant. The damping of pitch would be a nice comfort benefit as well.

[@alanrobinson4318]

How much difference is there in performance to that of cav plates ?

[@hullvanebv2550]

Do you mean interceptors with cav plates? There is a paper comparing Hull Vane with interceptors at various speeds for a typical round bilge displacement hull on our website (AMECRC series 13): www.hullvane.com/papers/

[@alanrobinson4318]

@@hullvanebv2550 Interesting. I'm curious as to the differences between the fixed propulsion you diagram and outboard propulsion. The cav plates/ appended vanes I've seen on either side of outboard driven boats help with planing. I believe that your treatise is also. As well as efficiency.

[@MrRalphla54]

What would be the payback period for a typical cargo ship?

[@sl66ggehrubt]

How fucking expensive can this vane be? It's not hard to make, a welder could crank one out in a few days.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Depends which kind of ship, and of how it's used. Tankers and bulk carriers are too slow for this, and you will never get payback. On some others we get less than 3 years, and on some newbuilds 0 years (because the saving on propulsion power is bigger than the cost of Hull Vane). The latter are usually faster than typical cargo ships (e.g. crewboats,).

[@apackwestbound5946]

Question, when doing your research and development of this design how deep did you go into the design at the starboard and port horizontal end of the hydrofoil? Specifically, did you do analysis using "winglets and scimitar winglets like Airbus and Boeing?

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hi Apack, good question. Winglets can help in some cases, but not as general as on aircraft wings. It depends of the local flow and the speed range of the vessel (narrow vs. wide). Some of our Hull Vanes are U-shaped, which means the wing curves up at the tips, to become the struts.

[@ahmetkrom]

can this beused on yachts of 15 to 20 meter length and would it have the same effect as on larger ships

[@hullvanebv2550]

Yes, if their speed range is suitable (5-20 knots roughly). We've done several boats of 9 to 25 m.

[@billyquinn1864]

could this help with a 80' catamaran

[@fanjerry8100]

Make sense, wonder why people didn't implement this earlier.

[@chrisevil7012]

wonder if it would tear off in a heaving sea. they show it in still, calm water. mother nature would probably rip that spindly piece of steel right off the hull in an average squall =p

[@aleshinteregger8554]

i think the right materials didn't exist. for instance sailing boats use carbon fibre in their foils

[@bobpante8126]

It's not new. Trim tabs have been used on smaller vessels in the US for decades.

[@21mozzie]

There is nothing new in boats. If you ever see anyone claiming that they have invented some new thing for boats, you can safely bet that someone did it decades ago.

[@21mozzie]

I was watching a ferry today at max power with its bow high up in the air and thought that could be fixed with a wing on the stern to shift the centre of pressure backwards. Then I logged onto here and see this video. Creepy.

[@007Jefke1]

I am pretty shure that when large ships are anchored, or docked in a harbor canal, the flow of the water over this 'wing' will cause strong upward forces. Therefor the wing should in fact be able to move, this way it would act more like a pitch-damper (look up yaw-damper in aerodynamics). This would be more of a factory installment instead of a aftermarket product.

[@timlolxP]

i dont think so even if you have like 4kn current this will have nearly none effect... Like an airplane wing will produce nearly 0 lift at 20 kn. Thats why they said it is suited for vessels for 15kn+ (Container, Offshore. milittary) on slower vessels the effect is to small (Tanker, bulker).

[@carmelpule6954]

Well, all I can see at the moment is that it is a large trim tab which could modify the angle at which the hull runs, I feel that if the hull alone is running at the right angle this would not bring about any benefits, but only drag. For a hull that is not running at the optimum angle, it many bring some advantages.

[@TechnoGlobalist]

You don't get it. Its has a much more complex principles behind it than trimm tabs

[@carmelpule6954]

@@TechnoGlobalist Well, I have tried this on my displacement boat and since the transom and hull are lifted, then the flow of water will contain an upwards velocity or the rear part of the natural wave around the displacement hull. One is invited to think that putting in a horizontal Vane as suggested in this video one could surf on this rear part of the hull wave and so gain speed, but the drag of the vane and the suction due to the uplift at the rear of the ship's hull is nonlinear and rises at a higher rate and so what one gains, one loses. Nature itself thought it out before we did and so for the greatest efficiency the design must be in the hull itself and not any appenages introduced on the hull. Birds and fish and dolphins and orcas do pretty well without additional appenages. The best manner for efficiency is to design a good hull in the first place. Anything pushed along beyond its natural speed is expensive. Also just because there are no moving parts on the vane, it does not mean that there are no maintenance costs. With my vane, it certainly trimmed the hull to run straight, but at the expense of fuel at the top displacement cruising speeds. If it was not so inconvenient, displacement hulls would benefit if the propeller was put right under the midship as the high pressure at the back of the propeller would then forcefully fill in what in normal condition is a suction zone at the aft of midship run of the vessel. This arrangement would in fact cause the inclined aft part under the ship to act as the vane described in this video. But it is all so inconvenient to add a midship draft to a displacement vessel. I would like to hear about the explanation of the complex principles that you referred to as acting on this vane! for as far as I am concerned it is no more than a wing with the right angle of attack to surf the rear hull wave.

[@jimmascaro2456]

Can this be applied to smaller motorboats as well?

[@hullvanebv2550]

We have a semi-custom Hull Vane to provide an affordable solution for displacement motoryachts of 10 to 20m with a maximum speed of about 14 knots (trawler-type yachts).

[@ysesq]

so like an outboard hydrofoil ? those things suck. they add yawing forces and make steering difficult at speed/in waves. i have them on my boat but never again.

[@Nevir202]

An interesting video. I’m curious, does this provide more benefit to ships with a bulbous bow, through the synergy of keeping it at the ideal level it was designed for? Or as this adjusts trim, and the bulb was probably designed with the innate trim of the ship in mind, does this necessitate redesign of the bulb to see maximum gains? 🤔

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hull Vane works both on ships with bulbous bows and without. They work well together, but some ships (e.g. RPA 8) are too slender in the bow to gain from a bulbous bow, and can still have a big benefit from the Hull Vane. Hull Vane helps keep the vessel more even-keel throughout the speed range, which is advantageous for the bulbous bow.

[@michaelteeple8704]

Looks good. I could justify this more if the tips were active to be used as anti roll stabilizers. But the only real benefit would be commercial vessels that could really see the fuel savings pay for the install more quickly before it broke or needed cleaning and offset any fuel savings.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hi Michael, the beauty of the Hull Vane is in its simplicity. Very effective with no moving parts, purely from hydrodynamic effects. Similar to the bulbous bow in this respect.

[@alpinemaximus7085]

Why not have a hull vane on front as well?

[@hullvanebv2550]

It's possible but this only gives resistance reduction at higher speeds than the typical application range of the Hull Vane. For seakeeping it's very interesting, and Hull Vane can be a good combo with a (retractable) T-foil forward.

[@compassft]

2:13...this really confuses me...I have always known that a wing produces lift and drag, that points backward, and not a forward thrust...

[@Rocco_Kurokawa]

Yes, when a plane fly's horizontally and the air flow comes from the front. But when it comes from the front and below, it is the same as if the airplane is flying slightly downwards, in which case it accelerates. That's how any glider flies. When the wind is coming from below, the plane can fly horizontally and still accelerates, this is how slope gliding works. Same effect here, the water current under the ship moves slightly upwards, and thus the foil can generate lift up and forwards.

[@compassft]

@@Rocco_Kurokawa you are right, I was considering only the main horizontal flow and not the local vertical one they speak about in the video

[@paulmahy]

I wonder if it increases parametric rolling on fast container ship hulls - or similar? Pitching the nose down in large oceanic seas would seriously affect the ships stability.

[@21mozzie]

I would imagine not. As the stern moves down, the angle of attack of the wing would increase, increasing lift and the force in the opposite direction to motion. As it moves up the angle of attack would be reduced causing the force to be reduced. Thus the force graph would be 90° out of phase with the pitching of the ship and dampen the motion.

[@paulmahy]

Show me a vessel that has it now, has had it for a while, or since it's launch 33 years ago . I have requested a list of vessels employing this as you will see from the online discussion, nothing, and yet no solid reply. honest opinion - this is bullshit.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Paul, you missed the word "accumulated". No ship has it yet for 33 years. The ships that have it, have sailed with it for 33 years alltogether (accumulated). Some examples: Karina, Alive, Thémis, Nieuwe Maze, 18-2, Lola, RPA 8, one of 7, Jetten 65. Check out these videos before you call this bullshit: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jHjNpZKvZbiWoNE kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIisZGt_fZylq6c

[@paulmahy]

Today, I have taken a rib past 9 tankers at Fawley, 3 car carriers, 4 box boats and 3 cruise ships, not one of them has one and the masters I spoke to -OCL, BP Oil, Shell, said they either hadnt heard of it, or wouldn't sail on a ship with it.

[@Bryn0x]

Hi Paul, there are over 500.000 ships and boats (with AIS) in the world. Hull Vane is applicable to maybe 5% of them. Only 13 have been built so far. Good luck searching around Fawley, but I do recommend the internet.

[@spawnof200]

so basically it helps to reduce drag?

[@hullvanebv2550]

yes, and reduce ship motions (pitching and yawing mainly)

[@trabant1]

Will it work on a sailing catamaran? How much draft if so?

[@hullvanebv2550]

Generally sailing catamarans are too light and their hulls are too slender for Hull Vane. Better look at fully foiling catamarans, like those of www.dnaperformancesailing.com

[@stathisk3]

Would this technology have any effect on semi planning motoryachts with V stern?

[@hullvanebv2550]

Yes, definitely. Check out Vandervalk Yachts' new 32 m (105 foot) Jangada II for example. Several patrol vessels are under construction with such a hull shape with a Hull Vane as well.

[@marsianmynul1824]

awesome video, very informative and innovative. i like this video. thanks.

[@daylenhigman8680]

I wonder if it would be possible to hydrofoil with a single foil, It'd probably have to be on a jet ski though

[@danr5105]

I wonder if the hull vane helps with propulsion in a confused sea condition? I understand this "help" was not the first thing on the designers mind.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Yes, it helps. It reduces the added resistance from pitching and yawing in waves. And it has a pumping effect, like any hydrofoil or wing which is moved up and down in a flow generates forward thrust (like a pumpabike).

[@isaiah30v8]

So would just the energy from the waves making the ship go up and down convert to forward motion like a pumpabike? If so, that really is a cool idea!

[@Bryn0x]

Hi Carmel, that is a misconception. Optimizing just the trim angle will give you a few percent. The Hull Vane can save 10-15% on many ships by removing the trim tab (or wedge), even if you end up with the same trim angle eventually. It influences the trim of course (strong vertical force) but this is not always even desirable. The effect is really in the generation of forward thrust and the modification of the wave profile of the ship. I would say it's more similar to a bulbous bow than to a large trim tab.

[@peterk2455]

Go to any outboard motor retailer, ask them to show you a set of 'Doel Fins', these have been in use for decades. Just a variation on hydrofoils, going back to 1890's from John Thornycroft.

[@jimbo92107]

Forgot to mention a fifth benefit: In waves, the dampened rocking of the hull will also provide a much more stable experience for passengers, crew, cargo, and mechanical stress on the ship's hull itself. Any cruise ship maker should celebrate and exploit this tech immediately. Has anybody experimented with variable geometries in hull vanes?

[@jthepickle7]

When 14 (1968), driving down the highway with my parents, I thought a scoop atop the cab of semi trucks would deflect wind from hitting the flat face of the 'box'. I think I told my parents of my idea, crickets.

[@phinkstar00]

So basically like a car spoilers?

[@grancito2]

Car spoilers are to spoil the look of the car, or the owner.

[@hullvanebv2550]

yes, but upside down. And water is different than air, and on ships we have a water/air interface, which causes wave formation (and therefore saving potential). There are indeed car spoilers (wings) which also have a negative resistance (downforce+forward force) because they're placed in a downward flow.

[@jamesmerkel9442]

Sleek, the equations & multi forces at work might b complicated but the design is perfectly simple. Just behind the ship u a generating lift 1 & 2 the prop & wing r postioned so as to maximize this lift. At rear u hve the most leverage, & lifting force helps to bal out rolling wave force. Smoother ride less drag candy ass simple.

[@geekwithabs]

I'll definitely install a hull vane next time I buy a container ship

[@KingHalbatorix]

hey that's clickspring's music

[@prostytroll]

0:35 Impressive savings of negative 14% ...

[@alessandrobacci7835]

Interesting concept!

[@someolddude7076]

I’ve installed 11 of these on my boat, now it’s so efficient I end up with more fuel than when I start.

[@frilink]

This is like spoilers for boats.....

[@gregeconomeier1476]

The recreation market is lower in unit price but larger in total sales. How about a vanes for smaller recreational vessels? Your accountants can explain this to you.

[@hullvanebv2550]

We are shortly bringing out a semi-custom Hull Vane for the recreational market, in particular for displacement motoryachts of 10 to 20 meters with a speed up to 11 knots. There are a lot of those in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany (a lot of inland waterways) but most recreational vessels elsewhere are fully planing boats, and too fast for the Hull Vane.

[@hectorkeezy1499]

Great work. I will buy one.

[@capnbilll2913]

Hydraulic trim tabs do the same thing.

[@tedhernandez2394]

Capn BillL, My buddy had a 38ft Silverton. It came with trim tabs......We took the boat out to the continental shelf, 'bout 95 miles from Sandy Hook NJ. ( Mako SharkFishing) . We hit some rough water on the way there. So I don't know how efficient those tabs were....Guess maybe in calmer waters they're feasible?

[@capnbilll2913]

@@tedhernandez2394 Yes, with heavy seas the inertia of the boat when hit by a wave overcomes the lift of the trim tabs. Also they are more effective with speed, hard to attain when you are climbing significant waves.

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hi Captain bill. Hydraulic trim tabs do one of the four effects (see video) of the Hull Vane: trim correction. They do this by creating a lift force which is angled aft. Hull Vane does this with a lift force which is angled forward. This makes a big difference in resistance.

[@francesco5254]

Amazing idea!

[@gregeconomeier1476]

how about a vane for a 20' sportfishing boat!!

[@hullvanebv2550]

A 20' sportfishing boat is too fast for the Hull Vane, it will be a fully planing boat.

[@hv9356]

Hydrodynamics is a tricky science, there are usually trade offs for everything.

[@grancito2]

Yes, like added area for marine growth to slow the boat.

[@hv9356]

@grancito2 I was thinking it also adds weight to the boat. 5 to 10,000 pounds is nothing to sneeze at...

[@hullvanebv2550]

The Hull Vane adds weight, but is often net-weight-negative: it saves more weight in fuel capacity (for a given range) and engine weight (for a given top speed) than its own weight. It can be applied as a weight-saving measure. Also, the penalty of the extra weight is much smaller than the hydrodynamic benefit.

[@hv9356]

@Hull Vane Bv That's the trick, penalty vs benefit. Now given this device adds stern lift, does that interfere with the protruding bow bulb design ?? Which creates an opposite wave effect and cancels out waves going down the sides of the ship...

[@hullvanebv2550]

@High Velocity, There's not much interaction with the bulbous bow, except that the running trim can have an influence on the bulb's efficiency. The bulbous bow works on the bow wave, the Hull Vane on the stern wave. We have it on both ships with and without a bulbous bow.

[@aidanthornbury]

Great for reducing drag until barnacles build up on it, thus interrupting the foil shape and essentially canceling out any benefit, but rather adding more drag. Just gotta keep it clean I guess.

[@hullvanebv2550]

This is valid for all surfaces of a ship, but in particular the rudders and propellers, because they see a higher flow speed and are not in the boundary layer. Almost nothing has a better return on investment than regular cleaning (by diver) of propellers and rudders. While you're at it, give the Hull Vane a cleaning as well ;) This also depends of your anti-fouling of course and how often (and at which speed) you sail. Reducing the benefit somewhat is possible, but to cancel out the benefit (10-20% resistance reduction), you'd need an extreme amount of fouling over the entire ship, not just on the Hull Vane.

[@FourthWayRanch]

It's a hydrofoil, a few barnacles and the flow will separate.

[@Sugarsail1]

Or how to catch kelp, fishing nets and floating logs.

[@RadRidesByCru]

Waiting for someone to bolt a Fast & Furious wing to the bottom of their john boat.

[@AquaMarine1000]

Invest in a hydrofoil for your outboard motor, they can make difference in trim to a stern weighted boat. Cheers

[@boydownunder007]

Brilliant it all makes sense

[@russellmoore1533]

International 14 foot (I14) sailing boats have used something like this for many years, except the foil is mounted onto the rudder and is adjustable.

[@kevinnapier1014]

This is an IMPORTANT item!! There should be government grants FOR addition of this item to ALL current vessels! I like this, and appreciate the work that has gone into the R&D here! #Conservation #Instagood #BeTheChangeYouWantToSee #SocialMedia #Environment #Efficiency #Maritime #Business #Ship #CargoShip #ContainerShip #MEARSK #STOLT #EXXON #ODJFELL #BP #Aramco

[@hullvanebv2550]

No grants are necessary for many ships, and in particular governmental ships (patrol vessels and naval ships), it's just a really good investment. The payback period is really short on such ships. But be aware that this doesn't work on all ships (only on about 5% of the ships, but on those it works really well).

[@FarStarBD]

awesome design, i like this. pl upload more

[@garyv2196]

it can't be maintenance-free because of the barnacle's buildup etc.

[@pgprentice]

So this is trim tabs for big ships...

[@Crazystuffyousee]

Not sure what the big deal is... The boating industry has been utilizing cavitation plates for decades, which does basically the same exact thing as this "hull vane" except its not mounted under the boat.

[@hullvanebv2550]

So it's a very different thing. An anti-cavitation plate is not situated in an upward flow, and therefore does not generate a forward-angled lift force.

[@asdasd-tu7cu]

This is not that much beneficial. They are improving wave-making resistance but adding too much weight + wetted surface area. In addition, this technology is already used via BULBS. You simply put the bulb behind the ship and destroy the flow that comes from the propeller. The water should be as much as more open after the propeller. Propellers have the best efficiency when there is open water. You little bit of improved stern wake and that is all. There is no way to gain 14% efficiency with this with any hydrodynamically analyzed ships. The effect and benefit is exaggerated.

[@deltacx1059]

Up to 14%? Sounds quite nice.

[@hullvanebv2550]

The numbers in this video are quite outdated. We've since done several vessels where the measure savings are well over 20%, such as the 52 m OPV Thémis (retrofit) and the 25 m patrol vessel RPA 8. Both are in videos on our KZbin channel and on our website.

[@jamesmerkel9442]

water dynamics r diff than air, greatly diff in drag, but idea is the same.

[@jamesmerkel9442]

A bi-plane gives even more lift but w/drag. Air & plane drag increases greatly w/speed, but ship r not going to get the grea increase in drag w/speed bc they already hve great drag from water & don't go great speed. So if 1 wing is good a 2nd lower wing bigger a bit behind it r even better. Twice the wave sofening & less drag along the hull.

[@camtheman559]

Works so good no one uses them!

[@robertpapps5383]

Impressive!

[@a-skepticalman6984]

Why are we not funding this, already?

[@discoveryoutdoorskcfishing236]

I need one of these for my boat

[@hullvanebv2550]

Give us a call, or send us an e-mail ;)

[@diGritz1]

If it can't be gold plated and double as an underwater wet bar which, i suppose, would make it a wet wet bar I'm not interested. The only thing I want on my super yacht is useless overprice cannon fodder and stripper poles...... lots and lots of stripper poles.

[@brokenmedic9133]

Amazing.

[@H.R.T.P]

This isn't new. Haven't they heard of hydrofoil

[@hullvanebv2550]

Hydrofoils exist since 100 years, to lift very fast and light ships out of the water and therefore to reduce resistance by reducing the wetted surface. Hull Vane is the only application of a hydrofoil for displacement ships. It looks like a hydrofoil, but the working principles are completely different, and the type of ships on which it is applied are completely different (way too heavy for full hydrofoiling).

[@Sugarsail1]

@@hullvanebv2550 Only one eh? Here's a patent from 1955 for the same damn thing. It specifically mentions displacement hulls. LOL Who you trying to fool? patents.google.com/patent/US2832304A/en

[@sgabriel]

3:24 "Damp", not "dampen". (Also, it's already wet!)

[@michaelcopeland8806]

damp·en 2. make less strong or intense. "nothing could dampen her enthusiasm" Dampen is correct.

[@sgabriel]

@@michaelcopeland8806 Umm, yes. Her enthusiasm notwithstanding, in engineering, in English, "damp" is more common and correct in relation to vibration and oscillation.

[@michaelcopeland8806]

@@sgabriel Damp relates to engineering only when used as a verb, which is Dampen. www.dictionary.com/browse/damp

[@sgabriel]

@@michaelcopeland8806 I recommend against using Google exclusively as a research tool. A lot of people do say "dampen" these days, so: fine. But I don't like it, and a lot of other engineers don't like it either. Anyway, doesn't matter particularly. Having said that, mostly we use "damp" as an intransitive verb, as in "damp down" or "damp out".

[@michaelcopeland8806]

@@sgabriel Then why are you trying to correct someone else's use of a word, when it is you using the same word incorrectly, just because you don't like it. Dictionaries are dictionaries. Education is a wonderful thing.