Ez az egyetlen tényleg részletgazdag térképes animációs munka a Magyar szabadságharcról, nagyon jó lett.
@szalard4 жыл бұрын
Köszi szépen!
@theremapping38403 жыл бұрын
Remarkably we'll made! This is a great work showing off the many difficulties which the Hungarian People have had in their history. The research and animation is superb!
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much! It was very hard for me, because I do not know how to make an animation, so I had to make every slide of it manually. :)
@theremapping38403 жыл бұрын
@@szalard practice is the only way to become great at mapping; and this was probably some great practice. Either way wonderful job,
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
@@theremapping3840 Thank you very much. Unfortunately my time is very little. I would be happy to make historical maps, but I have no time. I saw your maps. Good job! You are very good.
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
@@theremapping3840 Did you saw my longer version of this map, with a little information too about the Hungarian revolution of 1848-49? kzbin.info/www/bejne/jIarp5WIm7Oklck
@theremapping38403 жыл бұрын
@@szalard Oh Wow, I haven't seen this yet; but I'm going to now; also thanks, my videos take a long time to research and animate.
@Shunshnura3 жыл бұрын
Nagyon jó! Could you send me the version of "Kossuth Lajos azt üzente" you used from around 2:34 - 5:12 ? I never heard this version before but I really like the tone of it.
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
Köszönöm kzbin.info/www/bejne/onushn9qmt19gZI
@Shunshnura3 жыл бұрын
@@szalard Köszönöm szépen!
@nixogen78102 жыл бұрын
This is amazing! I'm American and there is barely any documentation of these wars. Videos like these and your other ones with a timeline are helpful. I see that you yourself are extremely well versed, in the topic, so do you know any books about this in English?
@szalard2 жыл бұрын
big man stranded demon Thank you for your kind words. Yes, this war is one of my favourite peiods in our history. Did you saw my other, more detailed video, in which I also shortly comment on the events? kzbin.info/www/bejne/jIarp5WIm7Oklck About English books. You can find many old books in English, full view free on Google books. I will give only their title, because if I post the links, my comment its likely to disappear, because this happened many times with me. - William Bernard Maccabe: A True Account of the Hungarian Revolution. London 1851 - E. O. S.: Hungary and its revolutions, with a memoir of L. Kossuth, Covent --garden 1854 - Arthur Görgey: My Life and Acts in Hungary in the Years 1848 and 1849, New York 1852 (this is the best book of these, because it is written by the Hungarian high commander, Görgei, himself) So these you can find pdf, and read for free. As for new books, unfortunately there are few. I can recomand: - Deák, István. Lawful Revolution: Louis Kossuth and the Hungarians 1848-1849 - Nobili, Johann. Hungary 1848: The Winter Campaign. Edited and translated Christopher Pringle. Warwick, UK: Helion & Company Ltd., 2021. - Gábor Bona: The Hungarian Revolution and War of Independence, 1848-1849 : a military history, New York : Distributed by Columbia University Press, 1999. And, I think, the best book on the military history of the Hungarian revolution and freedom war is about to appear. The most detalied and modern book abou these events: "1848-1849. The Military history of the Freedom War" of Róbert Hermann, the best Hungarian historian about the military events of the 1848-49 Hungarian revolution, is being translated in English, and as I hear, it will will appear in a couple of months at the Helion Printing house in England. I used the original Hungarian version for my videos too.
@nixogen78102 жыл бұрын
@@szalard Thank you very much! And yes, I did see your other video.
@nixogen78102 жыл бұрын
@@szalard Any update on the translated book? I've done a bit of research and the Austrian military history for 1849 is going to release in the 'Autumn Release', will Hermann's book be released around that time too?
@szalard2 жыл бұрын
@@nixogen7810 Hi, I did nőt heard any news. Chris the translator wrote me some months ago that IT will be released until autumn. I will ask him about this. You can still check ms articles in wikipedia about the battles. I am making them until I put every important battle on the wikipedia. Some days ago I finished the Fourth Battle of Komárom. I have to make only the map. The articles from Hatvan to the Fourth Battle of Komárom are mine, and they are well documented with the most important sources.
@nixogen78102 жыл бұрын
@@szalard Alright, thank you as always for your incredible help!
@Kapa115 Жыл бұрын
The most epic part is from 4:00 Köszönöm a videót, és szép munka
@szalard Жыл бұрын
Köszönöm. Nagyon örülök, hogy tetszett.
@stefandusan96293 жыл бұрын
Hungarians are powerful opponents, nice video.
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much.
@antoniogramsci82176 жыл бұрын
Good job m8
@enroar14102 жыл бұрын
Nagyon jó!Great video.
@kailanthecartographer26274 жыл бұрын
Nice video! What are your sources for this, I am interested to learn more about this topic myself.
@szalard4 жыл бұрын
Hi, thank you for liking my video. I used many many sources, but they are in Hungarian. Unfortunately very few sources are in English or other language about this war. These were the main Hungarian sources I had used: - Bánlaky, József (2001). A magyar nemzet hadtörténelme (The Military History of the Hungarian Nation) (in Hungarian). Budapest: Arcanum Adatbázis. - Csikány, Tamás (2015). A szabadságharc hadművészete 1848-49 ("The Art of Warfare in the War of Independence of 1848-1849") (in Hungarian). Budapest: Zrínyi Katonai Kiadó. - Hermann, Róbert (2013). Nagy csaták. 16. A magyar függetlenségi háború ("Great Battles. 16. The Hungarian Freedom War") (in Hungarian). Budapest: Duna Könyvklub. - Hermann, Róbert, ed. (1996). Az 1848-1849 évi forradalom és szabadságharc története ("The history of the Hungarian Revolution and War of Independence of 1848-1849) (in Hungarian). Budapest: Videopont. - Hermann, Róbert (2001). Az 1848-1849-es szabadságharc hadtörténete ("Military History of the Hungarian Revolution of 1848-1849") (in Hungarian). Budapest: Korona Kiadó - Hermann, Róbert (2004). Az 1848-1849-es szabadságharc nagy csatái ("Great battles of the Hungarian Revolution of 1848-1849") (in Hungarian). Budapest: Zrínyi - www.bibl.u-szeged.hu/bibl/mil/... - mek.oszk.hu/11800/11859/pdf/11... (1-10) I made a longer video, with some "dramatic music and storytelling" about this (the map is the same, but I added some contemporary pictures and I tried to tell the story): kzbin.info/www/bejne/jIarp5WIm7Oklck So, some of the very few sources in English: - Istvan Deak: Lawful Revolution: Louis Kossuth and the Hungarians 1848-1849 (2001) W&N - Gabor Bona: The Hungarian Revolution and War for Independence, 1848-1849: A Military History (East European Monographs S.), Columbia University Press (25 May 2000)
@szalard4 жыл бұрын
This guys has a great description of the military activity of the greatest general of the Hungarian army in 1848-49, Artúr Görgei: sites.google.com/view/peterbayer/blog/blog-3-hungarys-only-military-genius sites.google.com/view/peterbayer/blog/blog-4-hungarys-only-military-genius?authuser=0 sites.google.com/view/peterbayer/blog/blog-10-hungarys-only-military-genius?authuser=0 Here you can find some old free Google books from the second part of the 19th century: www.google.com/search?q=1848+hungarian+revolution&tbm=bks&sxsrf=ALeKk00F4gyRy9wt0j2Owhl73IhJWeYJ2g:1596051478686&source=lnt&tbs=bkv:r&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjnobiLm_PqAhU7i8MKHSJNCnoQpwUIIQ&biw=1366&bih=654&dpr=1 And here are some wikipedia articles, made by me about some battles and personalities of the 1848-49 Hungarian freedom war: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art%C3%BAr_G%C3%B6rgei en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gy%C3%B6rgy_Klapka en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Hatvan en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_T%C3%A1pi%C3%B3bicske en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Isaszeg_(1849) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Battle_of_V%C3%A1c_(1849) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Nagysall%C3%B3 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Battle_of_Kom%C3%A1rom_(1849) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Buda_(1849) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Csorna en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Pered en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Gy%C5%91r en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Battle_of_Kom%C3%A1rom_(1849)
@kailanthecartographer26274 жыл бұрын
@@szalard Thank you regardless for providing the sources you used! I appreciate it.
@szalard4 жыл бұрын
@@kailanthecartographer2627 Your welcome.
@TheGeezer303 жыл бұрын
@@szalard This is brilliant information. Thank you, my dear chap, for the detailed video, and the sources. My missus is Magyar; she is from Cegled, the town of Kossuth. Hungarian History is of great interest to me. Cheers
@totsxka-6 жыл бұрын
Lehetne a Rákóczi szabadságharcról is
@szalard6 жыл бұрын
Sajnos ez nagyon strapás munka. Én készítettem egy halom térképet a "kalandozások" bemutatásához is. Minden térkép elkészült, de ahhoz, hogy mozgóvá tudjam tenni, ahhoz több ezer résztérképet kell elkészítsek (amelyek a hadjáratok útját és a csatákat bemutató nyílak és egyéb ikonok mozgását kell érzékeltessék), amihez azonban nincs erőm. A térképeket feltettem ide, de ahhoz, hogy egy mozgó térképet készítsek ebből, ahhoz túl sok energia kellene. www.deviantart.com/sylvain1975/gallery/67012876/Hungarian-Conquest-and-Campaigns-Era-838-to-970 Egyedül ez nem megy, és az animációhoz nem értek.
@Koopinator3 жыл бұрын
Well done.
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@gostivan77443 жыл бұрын
Do you think that Matthias Corvinus was Romanian?
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
Mathias Corvinus, the king of Hungary, with a Hungarian mother (Erzsébet Szilágyi), and his father who easily could be the son of the Hungarian king and Holly Roman emperor Sigismund of Luxembourg why would be Romanian? This is nonsense. Even if his fathers father would had been from Wallachia, that time the Wallachian nobility was Cuman, so his ancestors would had been partly Hungarian and Cuman, maybe Hungarian and German (if the theory with Sigismund of Luxemburg would be correct), but in no case Romanian. And you are lucky, because in January the bones of Mathhias Corvinus's son, John Corvinus started to be archeogenetically studied, and they say that in 2-3 months, the exact origin will be completely elucidated once and for all. kzbin.info/www/bejne/q6KQkHahmK1peZY So wait for the results.
@gostivan77443 жыл бұрын
@@szalard I think we saw the exact same video, about the origin of Hunyadi János
@canosuslupus28622 жыл бұрын
@@gostivan7744 Mátyás was an ethnic Hungarian person 100%.
@DhhSbsh-i3n3 ай бұрын
Wow, it was made by you? 😯
@szalard3 ай бұрын
Yes. It took me a year... The documentation and the animation. :)
@DhhSbsh-i3n3 ай бұрын
@@szalard Wow, it's really nice, can I ask you something tho?
@szalard3 ай бұрын
@@DhhSbsh-i3n Thanks. OK! Of course!
@DhhSbsh-i3n3 ай бұрын
@@szalard What's your opinion about Israel? 🤔
@szalard3 ай бұрын
@@DhhSbsh-i3n Well, that is not my domain of interest.
@hovsep63274 жыл бұрын
Hi!
@TheGroundHopper5 жыл бұрын
Hi dude, just seen your comments on a hungarian politics video and noticed the welsh dragon, clicked on the page and you have a affiliation with wales yet are hungarain, could you explain please because I'm very confused lol
@szalard5 жыл бұрын
Hi, I am Hungarian, but I love also Wales and the Welsh people and culture. I even taught to learn Welsh, but my job and other things do not allow me this. Why I love Wales? Maybe because one of the greatest Hungarian poets, Janos Arany wrote the poem: A walesi bardok (The Bards from Wales) which tells the legend of the slaughter of the 500 Welsh bards, by the English king Eduard I., and this is one of the most beloved Hungarian poems. Of course, besides of that, this poem makes parallels between the fate of the Welsh and the Hungarian people, which after the crush of the 1848-49 Hungarian revolution, which is presented in this video of mine, under which you commented, was in the situation of the Welsh people after the English conquest of Edward I. Also the fate of the 500 Welsh bards represent the fate of the Hungarian poets, who, after the defeat of the Hungarian revolution, were forced to prize the victorious Austrian enemy emperor (who won only thanks to the Russian help though), and like the 500 Welsh bards, they refused, facing the consequences. I think this is why the Hungarians love so much this poem, and I love so much the Welsh people.
@gostivan77443 жыл бұрын
Do you know the casulities of the revolution?
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
It is hard to know the exact numbers, but the historians estimate that the Hungarians lost around 40 000, on the other side the Austrians around 30 000, the Croatians 30 000, the Serbians 15 000, the Romanians 10 000 and the Russians around 13 500 lives among the soldiers, due to the battles and the cholera epidemic. Beisides of that the ethnic massacres took also many lives. The Romanians killed at least 10 000 Hungarian civilians (men, women, children), the Serbians also around 10 000 Hungarian civilians, while the Hungarian retaliation killed around 4500 Romanians, and around 1000-1500 Serbians, mostly from those who before that participated in the anti-Hungarian massacres, but also some real civilians too.
@gostivan77443 жыл бұрын
@@szalard Can you show me where you got the information from because I couldn't find anything about the casultities
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
@@gostivan7744 It is in the book Hermann Róbert: 1848-1849. A szabadságharc hadtörténete, Korona Kiadó, Budapest 2001, p. 401-403. The book is momentarily being translated into English at the Helion Publishing House.
@pp-bb6jj Жыл бұрын
As a Croat I cannot be happy seeing Germans and Russians conquering someone elses country. We Croats had to go in of course because you didn't saw us on the map but besides that no hard feelings.
@szalard Жыл бұрын
We, Hungarians and Croatians have another situation. The Croatian crown was occupied by the Hungarian king in 1097 in a personal union, and not through conquest. Because of this, Croatia retained a large internal autonomy with its leaders elected by Croatians, the language, education, everything was decided in Croatia. Yes, it was a short period of 50 years when some of these rights were taken away, between 1867-1918. But this is like less than 10 % of that period, when Croatia and Hungary were united. Personal union was, when a king of a country was elected by another country, when its dynasty died out, or because he was relative to that dynasty, was very common in Europe. The Habsburgs too took Hungary in a personal union. For comparation about the large autonomy of the Croatians, who thanks to this, retained their language, culture, were not assimilated, like for example the Scots, Welsh in Great Britain, who in the same way were in personal union with England, but the English forcedly assimilated them, thus, today only like 5 % of the Scots van speak Scotish Gaelic, 17 % of the Welsh van speak Welsh. Because of the assimilation, they today all speak only English. The same situation is with the Britons in France, who almost nobody can speak their ancient Celtic language, because they were forcedly assimilated. Lets say If the Croatian king would had the chance to occupy the Hungarian throne, then he would had done the same. This is history, nobody living today is guilty for that. 😊
@hungary895510 ай бұрын
Mennyi tragédia.
@romeo24735 жыл бұрын
Why would you mark Romanian territory as Russian or Ottoman?
@szalard5 жыл бұрын
What is that mean Romanian territory? In 1848-49, no such country as Romania existed: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7a/Europe_1848_map_en.png
Well I rather say that maybe the Turks are Hunnic, because the Huns appear with hundreds of years before the Turks. This is like saying that the Latins are Italians. Or to say that the Slavs are Serbians.
@SmokeyMountain03 жыл бұрын
@@szalard Hun is state name Hun empire.Attila is a Turk and you are a descendant of him. The first Turkish name in the world is Turk, the grandson of Noah.Russians are slavic,englishs are germanic,Turks are Turk. "Hun" is name of the empire
@SmokeyMountain03 жыл бұрын
@@szalard HUN is not people hun is name of state like yours HUNgary.Turks founded the Hun state
@szalard3 жыл бұрын
@@SmokeyMountain0 Ok, this is only a legend, that Turks are sons of Noah. Lets talk about how we, Hungarians see this. Yes, we are related to you, in blood. But neither we nor you are some kind of inferior. We are related archer civilizations, and genetically too we are related. Its enough to see peoples faces, how they are related. We came from the same cradle: the steppes of Central Asia. Our blood intermingled. Of course the name Hun is the name of the empire, but the names of the empires come from the name of the people which creates that empire. An empire is not created like, some people are gathering and say: lets name this empire "Tree". But the empire takes its name from the nation which creates it (Mongol empire, Russian Empire, etc.). Very rare takes the name of the founding person, like the Ottoman empire, and, if we research, this kind of Empire naming from a persons name or a religion, starts after the religious ideology of institutionalized religions becomes predominant (like the Holly Roman Empire, Islamic State - the name of the Arab empire). The name Turk in the historical documents appear only in the VI century AD. and its the name of those Tribes which founded the Gök Türk Empire. The name Turk is just the name of a tribe which became an empire. If Bumin's tribe would had been Kirghiz, then today you would say "Atilla was Kirghiz". So the Turk name was a tribal name which became popular, mostly because of the Gök Türk Empire, which united many nations which had related languages, forcing them to take this name. Bumin, Istemi, Elterish, etc., were very clever, because they named themselves Gök, coming from the Sky, so they showed their tribe like holly in the Tengristic religion of the ancient nomadic people. This created a divine respect towards them, enabling the name Turk to be popular among many related nations. So, we are brothers, we are related, we should keep together, help each others, but nobody is under the other, or vice versa.
@SmokeyMountain03 жыл бұрын
@@szalard I wanted to say him, we are equal. Nuhun had 3 sons sam, ham and yafes .the name of the first son of yafes is "Turk". You can search it on the internet. The first Turkish name in the world is "Turk"