The A340-200 and-300 were originally meant to be powered by a new geared turbofan engine, the IAE Superfan, but IAE cancelled production of the engine. So Airbus decided to use whatever engine they could find that would fit , the CFM 56. The -500 and -600 variants received the more powerful RR Trent 500.
@gteixeira10 ай бұрын
They could have used the engines of the 757, but to compete against the Boeing 777 they had to save on costs so they went to the A320 parts bin to get the engines and help reduce maintenance costs with the commonality. The A340 still ended up being too costly despite this measure.
@iamr4mi9 ай бұрын
the a340 was always meant to use the cfm 56, but airbus was open to other engines
@gteixeira9 ай бұрын
@@iamr4mi The Superfan was proposed first, before it was canceled. The CFM56 was an afterthought in the end.
@XX-zq4hv9 ай бұрын
30 years later also known as PW1100 xD
@Prodagist3 ай бұрын
@gteixeira It wasn't matinence costs so much as it was about fuel efficiency. The IAE superfan was supposed to be revolutionary, producing good amounts of thrust with never seen before efficiency. The problem was that IAE couldn't get the technology for the geared turbofan right, and in fact, it wouldn't be developed for another 20+ years by Pratt & Whitney. Airbus' whole marketing idea with the A340 was for it to be an extremely efficient quad jet, so when IAE gave up on the superfan, Airbus needed to find something that matched the fuel efficiency they had been planning for and advertising, the only engine that fit that bill was the CFM-56. It certainly did have the added benefit of commonality with the A320, but the main reason was for fuel efficiency.
@airplanedud10 ай бұрын
finally someone who cares about restoring old aircraft
@Clearly_Sam10 ай бұрын
He made the A360 :D
@itzjrileyplayzrblxofficial10 ай бұрын
@@Clearly_SamThere’s no A360 yet.
@_Widman_10 ай бұрын
@@itzjrileyplayzrblxofficial Do you understand jokes?🤦♂🤦♂
@Clearly_Sam10 ай бұрын
@@itzjrileyplayzrblxofficial How do you not understand the joke
@discorddude762810 ай бұрын
@@itzjrileyplayzrblxofficial r/woosh
@FalconX8810 ай бұрын
I now want an A320 with the GE90s....
@Aden-y7g10 ай бұрын
same too but with the 737 and the embraer E175
@darekwang10 ай бұрын
Cessna 172 with GE90
@ThatFL23210 ай бұрын
Piper Cub with GE90
@Comrade_Alex_2289 ай бұрын
Only one GE90 can to this. (Seriously, 2 GE90 been overpowered to A320, soo can use only 1 GE90 for this plane.)
@Gracell08 ай бұрын
A true neo
@Flight--tz5nf10 ай бұрын
They may be underpowered. (200 and 300) But inflight. The endurance of the plane in range makes up for it. It would help if your flaps where set accordingly. Which I am sure the 200/300 has a different flap setting compared to the 500/600.
@Randomvideos-zi7pe10 ай бұрын
A340neo Airbus:🕊️🕊️🕊️ Swiss: Fine I'll do it myself
@teb168710 ай бұрын
i was working for Lufthansa on the A340-300 and every time we went dpwn Runway 18 in Frankfurt, it felt like forever. We call it plane with 5 APUs
@aviationtaylor262610 ай бұрын
Who thinks Swiss is the Goat KZbinr 👇 Edit: Thanks Swiss you are my entire childhood thanks for hearting my comment 😊
@SmalKitty10 ай бұрын
meeee
@SmalKitty10 ай бұрын
meeee
@SmalKitty10 ай бұрын
meeee
@SmalKitty10 ай бұрын
meeee
@SmalKitty10 ай бұрын
meeee
@FrequencyORD10 ай бұрын
I’ve had a long weekend and our flight got cancelled, i guess there is nothing like watching swiss on a long road trip back home.
@mrwelshaviation_02410 ай бұрын
Next video: Turning the Cessna 152 into a rocket
@aahalay1510 ай бұрын
that sounds like a great idea
@hamburgor10 ай бұрын
@@aahalay15fr
@satyris41010 ай бұрын
I'll never forget my first time flying on a 777, walking down the steps at Grantley Adams into a wall of heat, and seeing up close the enormous engines that just flew us there from the UK. Impressive
@jakubchloe10 ай бұрын
I saw the thumbnail and thought: what have you done
@dapperman1110 ай бұрын
This was originally the main concept for the a340 except it would have 2 engines
@PR-xm1gi10 ай бұрын
A330?
@dapperman1110 ай бұрын
@@PR-xm1gikind of
@mypiang5 ай бұрын
so an a330
@dapperman115 ай бұрын
@@mypiang exactly
@HERD5994 ай бұрын
0:43 "The engines that are also mounted on the a320" Proceeds to show a jetstar a320 that uses iae engines.
@Joetheaviator.10 ай бұрын
Yay you posted a new video live long our aviation legend ❤
@hohohoho710 ай бұрын
50 secs ago
@I-Love_Aviation.10 ай бұрын
❤❤❤swiss, you are e true legend!
@SkyGearRev10 ай бұрын
I have been watching Swiss for over 5 years now and I always enjoy your videos. Cant wait till you reach 1M subs.
@amounguschip0459010 ай бұрын
Finnaly someone fixes this It looks cursed from the side but its fine on the front
@MalrusOSC10 ай бұрын
This plane could probably take off in reverse
@I-Love_Aviation.10 ай бұрын
Who thinks Swiss is a legend❤ 👇
@caboye10 ай бұрын
3:09 swiss lowkey doxxing himself
@sa_av10 ай бұрын
airbus better take notes⁉️⁉️💯💯🥶👌👌👌🗣️🗣️🔥🥶
@DutchRobloxGamer2 ай бұрын
7:22 wiggle wiggle wiggle
@troopool10 ай бұрын
5:46 bruh the tailstrike gon flatten the people on the beach😭
@grilledcheeselord13 ай бұрын
4:59 "ive created a monster cuz nobody wants to see marshall no more they want shady im chopped liver"
@emildaspookykid10 ай бұрын
Always a great day when Swiss001 uploads
@mybankaccountislow10 ай бұрын
been watching you for 2 years, W aviation king
@LSZH_aviation10 ай бұрын
0:42 "which are also mounted to the a320" (He speaks about CFM engines) but shows a picture of a a320 with IAE Engines 😂😭
@Avgeek1019210 ай бұрын
The a343-a342 is an absolute disaster, thanks for fixing it Swiss.
@Vahlee-A8 ай бұрын
Skinny planes with big engines are like pretty woman with big jugs ... beautiful
@Madflight210 ай бұрын
You just gave Airbus an idea for the a340-stronghundred
@Planes_man10 ай бұрын
Should add some GE engine
@AFRCSD10 ай бұрын
They should've put Trent 800's on the A340
@Aspriin10 ай бұрын
Finally a man who actually made the plane usable (I thought he was gonna do a car ad)
@gamefastwizz7 ай бұрын
interesting , didn't know the a340 is quite underpowered
@OshowAfrica10 ай бұрын
That was interesting to see
@BGTech110 ай бұрын
Finally, the a340 can compete with the 777
@Bestruction10 ай бұрын
I’m an aerospace tooling engineer and worked several parts of the GE9X engine
@otterfly10 ай бұрын
swiss the absolute legend
@I-Love_Aviation.10 ай бұрын
Early gang here 👇
@I-Love_Aviation.10 ай бұрын
FIRST! 3 seconds ago! As always, good video!❤
@ncmxd10 ай бұрын
Ah yes,the airbus a340 you actually fixed it💀
@Aden-y7g10 ай бұрын
he sure did 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
@aviationfin345610 ай бұрын
Right pal. Thats an eye sore and a half but 200% efficient
@Ilovecars-wd6xu5 ай бұрын
2 out of 4 of those ge-90s should be the backup engine instead of using all of them, since 2 of those are already enough to make the Boeing triple seven to airborne
@cybercat785110 ай бұрын
Fun fact: the 777’s big engines give it a cruising speed of Mach 0.84.
@PenPenGamez20139 ай бұрын
Why was the wing flexing up and down too much when you landed in Saint Barthélemy😂
@ruk2023--10 ай бұрын
I have only been on one A340 in my life (MAN - LAS) a few years ago and I was excited for it which soon changed to concern that we weren't actually going to get off the runway. I thought it had to be broken with how slowly it going moving.
@musicsounder10 ай бұрын
Virgin?!
@ruk2023--10 ай бұрын
I can't remember 100% if it was Virgin or Delta branded but I would have booked it through Virgin.@@musicsounder
@BestIkeaTable10 ай бұрын
Damn Swiss got some new merch
@katrinbrandt101010 ай бұрын
I like how you put the ad with the "remove befor flight sticker" before you actually took off.
@FridayNightFilmsCA10 ай бұрын
Looks like you built a euro-b52. When you gotta get an entire elphant walk of intercontinential bombers in the air before the nukes destroy them on the ground... all that power will come in handy.
@BlaBoy1710 ай бұрын
I was just watching a video about this plane and got this notification 😅
@StarTrekFan249 ай бұрын
Thats how good Swiss001 airlines is when it comes to landing and taking off (ik that is not a Swiss001 Airlines plane)
@sebastian001810 ай бұрын
Looks like a DC8 now
@shoebillstonk10 ай бұрын
How about putting those GE90/XWB Engines on an A380?
@Vinnay948 ай бұрын
This has the same energy as LS swapping cars.
@LGD13VR3 ай бұрын
Do this but with other aircraft
@spywalkz110 ай бұрын
Next, you should do this to the A380.
@mikeflytr6 ай бұрын
swiss could you add ge90’s to the 737 or 757 please
@A320XYT10 ай бұрын
Cooles Video 4:04 XD
@cybird110 ай бұрын
The Remove before Flight keytag actually looks really interesting
@SPiderman-rh2zk10 ай бұрын
YES SWISS YOU DID IT
@dogevid10 ай бұрын
The physics on the X-Works are really poor and its just a reskin for the A330
@AVbomber1210 ай бұрын
@Swiss001 what is your favourite airline? 🤔😏
@Elias-dk9gv7 ай бұрын
Dudes Videos are a techno party
@Gracell010 ай бұрын
My man just did the unthinkable🙀
@Cocadudu7 ай бұрын
Bro made a A340 - 50000
@samfromportadown10 ай бұрын
You didn't even use the most powerful GE90 variant ever produced, the GE90-115b. That one can do 115,000 pounds of thrust. Across four engines it would add an extra 60,000 pound of thrust. (Which is about half of the thrust the plane had with its original engines.)
@nabilelhamdaoui720910 ай бұрын
The engines showed on the A320 aren't CFM but IAE right?
@TrackingZCONTENT10 ай бұрын
man i love swiss but can you make a tut abt the airbus a320 or any plane tut less chance you will see this but if u have the chance please do so!!! (tut abt button how works and start up)
@Aviator_Yahya10 ай бұрын
Nice vid Swiss our best aviation legend❤❤
@matushie10 ай бұрын
Great video, thanks Swiss!
@isthisaperson6 ай бұрын
Try it with 2 of those giant engines, it might be a little more realistic.
@zaeemzaeem788110 ай бұрын
Day 4 of asking Swiss 001 to check out the Bugalaga airstrip in the flight sim
@zaeemzaeem788110 ай бұрын
Please
@CBFNetworksArchive10 ай бұрын
Airbus should make a remake of A340 as a -900 one that has these engies.
@Prodagist3 ай бұрын
So basically, the A350. They have no reason to do that when the A350 exists
@bsodgamer12349 ай бұрын
The GE90 has more power than the a340’s small engines altogether 💀
@roldmaster827610 ай бұрын
Stopping kids from saying “first”
@NajeebKuzhiyil-np9on10 ай бұрын
Thanks for letting me not tear to death because of the small engines that are smaller than my brain. My brain is 5 micro meters long
@c0r5e10 ай бұрын
Next 747 with 2 GE9X engines (if the GE9X becomes available after 5 years XD)
@ukrje10 ай бұрын
I do wonder... If the a380 could be actually work as an efficient aircraft with 3 ge90. Should be sufficient power at least
@DanTDMJace9 ай бұрын
How would they trijet it? No seriously, how would you trijet an A380?
@ukrje9 ай бұрын
@@DanTDMJace 2 ge90 under the wings and one in the rear between the vertical stabilizer?
@Prodagist3 ай бұрын
Can do you one better with that. The Trent 97 from the A350-1000 would also suffice in a tri-jet configuration A380. The Trent-97, while less powerful than the GE-9X, its a fair amount more efficient, and is still powerful enough to produce more thrust in a tri-jet configuration on the A380, than it currently is in a quad jet configuration currently. The A380 uses 4 Trent 900s, which produce a combined thrust of 280,000lbs 3 Trent 97s would produce 291,000lbs of thrust, 11,000lbs more, all while being roughly 35% more efficient than the current A380. The A380 in this hypothetical tri-jet configuration would boast significantly improved efficiency, as well better take-off, and landing performance. Unfortunately though, while creating this hypothetical tri-jet A380 has some massive benefits, it'd be more trouble than its worth. The third engine would necessitate a complete redesign of the A380's tail, and due to the complete change of weight an balance due to this third engine, much of the aircrafts internal structure would have to be completely redone to compensate for the aircrafts altered center of mass. It'd likely cost Airbus way more money than they're willing to spend to redesign the A380 in this way, since, even with all of the massive benefits this aircraft would have over its predecessor, it still probably wouldn't sell well enough for it to be worth it.
@semihgedik607810 ай бұрын
Airbus A340-1000 NEO💀
@THEbuffamericanguitarist10 ай бұрын
Airbus be taking notes rn
@TheRealREDracing10 ай бұрын
Ben loyal since 2018. Thank you swiss for the comedy
@user-AVELO713810 ай бұрын
What about adding the 737 MAX engine onto the A340-300?
@NicholasYT_6910 ай бұрын
hey swiss, you have the same flight sim controls as me. didn't notice it till now lol.
@thomaspagano271110 ай бұрын
you should try the new a380 for beam ng
@cachinerof110 ай бұрын
put these engines on a 757. full sports car of the skies
@GloriousNAIN10 ай бұрын
how about mounting the engines in reverse and try taking off with only reverse thrust???
@250KlinKYT10 ай бұрын
I saw one in Zürich and it took almost took quarter of the runway to takeoff
@BusBoysBusChannel609110 ай бұрын
It should be called the A340-700 😂
@hklamb568710 ай бұрын
So you've essentially made an A340-500
@VertyneOfficial10 ай бұрын
Now A340 is OVERPOWERED.
@G35Jeesh10 ай бұрын
Trying to get a sim tired of the controller. Will I be able to fly most planes with a hotas and throttle controlls?? G x56 for example
@Dio1985Ne10 ай бұрын
What kind of editing program do you use? :)
@Ostdeutscher_zocker10 ай бұрын
Ich kann verstehen warum jetzt auch nicht jeden tag ein Video kommt, weil man in die Videos ja auch immer ordentlich viel zeit reinsteckt, vor allem wenn sie so gut sind wie deine, ps. ich liebe deine Videos
@horrrogames228510 ай бұрын
Boeing:seeing the video hired Swiss001 Lol
@DirtieeeeAviation10 ай бұрын
I mean come on will you ever run out of video ideas…😂
@eliasdavey10 ай бұрын
dont u love swiss001's akwardness
@BenBeutler10 ай бұрын
that ad was the best ad I have ever seen
@lp-trainfan10 ай бұрын
4 ge9x‘s this thing would speed down the runway like a cannon ball xD
@aameenshakya393810 ай бұрын
he fixed the power problem of the 340 but not the efficiency fr