I FLEW ON THE CRJ200...SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO

[@outbacker292]

Hard to hate anything about any airplane that gets you to your destination safely.

[@johnmajane3731]

They are fine for what they are. A inexpensive jet to get provide low volume areas service with jet speeds. No they are not spacious but you are not typically going to be sitting in one for four hours either. You really don't have a choice to fly on something else from low volume airports.

[@Edmonchuck]

It's small, it's a bizjet confusing itself as a high-density passenger jet, but it gave small aerodromes jet service when they would have turboprops. It had its place.

[@hh1n]

The reason people hate the 200 is because a harsh label makes for an attractive review video. Nobody would watch a review that was titled "The CRJ200 is an ok commuter jet but not as spacious as a bigger plane". They really aren't that bad, and it beats driving 5 hours from nowhere Wyoming to an international hub.

[@JT-qf4it]

So what's the big Con? Its a small regional jet. I feel cramped in what ever I have to fly in.

[@billwilson6670]

You live in Prescott, AZ. Were you expecting an A 380 to swoop in and take you to your destination?

[@brightaviation]

I don’t live in Prescott

[@billwilson6670]

@@brightaviation My mistake.

[@DavidLovesJesus]

I flew on several of those. They were cramped but it was nice to take a jet into cities I could only take propeller planes into before.

[@Paxtonplayz64]

ive been on the crj200 with united wasnt bad at all

[@peterstock9974]

How are the seats. 2x2 2x1 didn't show the cabin

[@brightaviation]

The seats are 2x2

[@flyer_andy2023]

I do not hate the CRJ-200. It's a great plane. Smaller but so what

[@oubrioko]

left-to-right crosswind on takeoff

[@INSIDELINE65]

I like the CRJ200.

[@goosubux]

Been to DIA a few times. Nice airport. Just be ready to walk.

[@calvinnickel9995]

The CRJ-200 having the reputation as being the worst airplane comes from several different perspectives. As a passenger.. yes the seating room.. but also the lack of overhead bin space (this is all CRJs) lack of a true stand up cabin for those of us over 6 feet, and if the air conditioning isn’t working related to age because of a broken APU or the power and other bleed air demands in the aircraft. From a pilots perspective they are awful because they are aging so a lot of things are broken on them, they don’t have auto throttle like most other jets, they don’t have leading edge devices which makes approach into high altitude airports like Denver on a hot day very challenging since true airspeed is much higher, they are very underpowered requiring a “step climb” to higher altitudes. They have a very narrow gear for the same reason 737s have poor engine clearance-they were designed to use onboard air stairs at small airports but with the CRJ there’s no room for the wheels in the wings to make a wider short gear. From ATCs perspective they are a giant roadblock in the sky. Taking an entire state to get up to altitude and being in the way of much faster jets. From a maintenance/engineering perspective they are a business jet that was turned into an airliner. It was made to fly 200 hours a year.. not 2000 hours a year or more in airline service. Thus it was not up to the rigours it encountered. Like the 737 using a fuselage from a transcontinental airliner and then being beaten to death doing short hop high cycle service. But….. from the perspective of someone in 2000… it was a dream. Instead of flying on a noisy, cramped, slow, and old Brazilia or Metro or 1900 with no in flight service (no flight attendant), and even no bathroom in many of them.. getting smashed by turbulence and thunderstorms. Between this plane and the Dash 8.. it put nearly every regional airframer out of business by the 2000s. Hawker Siddeley, SAAB, Dornier, Fokker, Swearingen, Beechcraft-and even Boeing (the 717).. and the only reason Embraer survived was it did the same thing.. turning a business jet into an airliner. It was the right combination of size, capabilities, and cost for regional airlines who’d previously operated 19-30 passenger turboprops to go into jets without invoking the ire of mainline scope clauses.

[@marklihsu]

The devils chariot

[@winningfreak1]

You really need to go to voiceovers if you want your channel to take off, the reading text is just not great for the viewer

[@calvinnickel9995]

Voiceovers are awful. Either horribly amateurishly or annoyingly AI. Exceedingly few people have a golden voice for KZbin.

[@tonyde52]

Why trash your own video with a negative comment? Let the viewers have a chance to decide.

[@lordofbathurst]

It scares me because it doesnt feel safe however I flew in a CRJ700/900 back in November and it was s pretty nice

[@brightaviation]

The CRJ200 is a very safe aircraft, just not ideal to fly on due to space

[@gdoof1728]

Sounds to me if you have a champagne taste on a beer wallet my man - - - get real and put your big boy pants on

[@brightaviation]

@gdoof1728 My other videos would suggest different

[@gdoof1728]

@@brightaviationI guess I'll agreed to disagree---have a great one

[@zachwulf-americanpatriot5015]

Ill take the EMB 145 and crj 200 over a 737 lol

[@Tkrohn]

Dawg... put your shoes back on 😐

[@brightaviation]

Thanks for watching!

[@YukonGhibli]

ERJ-145s are much better than the devil's chariot CRJ.

[@TH-ky7df]

what a stupid review. Spacing and seats are from the airline. You fly a regional jet and think you should feel like British airways first class?

[@brightaviation]

thanks for watching

[@oubrioko]

Point to _any_ passenger airline on the planet that ever operated a CRJ-200 in _any_ other seating configuration Well, _we're waiting..._

[@tuskeddragon9147]

you must throw temper tantrums often

[@kjjones8627]

It's a TERRIBLE airplane, not sure why any airline would paint there name on it