I'll Keep Playing the Stafford Gambit as Long as I Keep Winning (FULL STREAM)

[@patataketchup848]

i watch eric rosen until i fell asleep

[@jovicalapad]

Me too.

[@Robin-rn7ip]

Same

[@swathys9123]

Same...

[@swathys9123]

He is my sleeping pill

[@mileswhsbasketball]

I think we all do

[@joehoughton7782]

Thanks for uploading these whole streams!

[@_TheWarChief_]

I’ve been trying to win with the stafford gambit but no one ever does what they’re supposed to do.

[@kazz811]

Yeah the key I discovered is that instead of looking for standard lines, you realize that it enables rapid development and experiment with that. Over time you start seeing the various possibilities as you play more.

[@michaeld519]

"Okay! Lesson on how to checkmate with a king and a rook. Drive the king to the edge. Then checkmate." 😂💀☠️

[@chrispope9418]

Dude. When you said shout out to 32 people watching. Solid. Love you homie. Keep teaching us !

[@jaingalt9444]

So awesome being able to rewind/pause/and study your streams! Thanks. Also, Challenge- Can’t check until you take 6 pawns. Can’t mate until you take all pawns. Also, as always, Kwak!

[@luciesneep]

I don't understand the meaning of "Kwak" ????? Pls explain?

[@kennystimpson2775]

@@luciesneep quack

[@moneymitch1303]

Quack, my favorite truck driver

[@typicalfurry2747]

This is how I learn the Stafford gambit

[@Kirisame312]

1:55:54 xQc subscribes and then there's an immediate wooden shield. Nice.

[@60403tnw]

that pawn queen challenge was dope

[@kennystimpson2775]

Woah nice, im learning the stafford refutation in the first game!

[@thetransferaccount4586]

none messes with beach cafe

[@matteur11]

Game at 1:10 i was crying… 😂😂😂

[@Mr_Nobody2222]

How do you know everything about the Stafford, class watching

[@Kinda314]

take your own queen haha!

[@extremetahj0]

a castle fork????

[@kennystimpson2775]

Cork

[@kamakhyathakur599]

13:39

[@Omrray]

Hi Eric come to Algeria Ghardaia

[@PieGotFace]

On my way! -Eric

[@dconfused9919]

Black always wins.

[@kamakhyathakur599]

21:54

[@Did_U_Know..]

Wait Engagement will rise here Right ????

[@kamakhyathakur599]

6:34

[@kamakhyathakur599]

12:31

[@widepeepoflo]

💙

[@notjohncena5108]

His voice is so calm and soothing, i instantly go to sleep mode. Sometimes i worry i might turn out to be a gay.

[@michaeld519]

If you worry about it you probably are gay. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that, so go enjoy it!

[@yoeymusic]

Don't worry just lean into it

[@kennystimpson2775]

Same

[@aaguantenk]

Look easy ... play stafford and cant afford ... lost at fifth moved

[@skull-agar7722]

Against weak players it sure works but against strong ones dont even try that lol

[@privacyplease5164]

Lol his top video is about him using stafford against grandmasters

[@skull-agar7722]

@@privacyplease5164 i just see weak players lol, a good master is prepared against that cuz its easy to refute... i have like 90% against stafford i am happy people play it free elo points...

[@meltedsnowman9637]

@@skull-agar7722 Most grandmasters aren’t creating prep against the Stafford lol.

[@skull-agar7722]

@@meltedsnowman9637 you are wrong... Grandmasters know the refutation of dubious lines, because if somebody funny tries to play dubious lines against them it will be an easy win.. and at the top lvl they do everything for a win.. i am talking about elite ofc probably not all grandmasters are super grandmasters.

[@meltedsnowman9637]

@@skull-agar7722 If someone plays a dubious line, a grandmaster won’t have to prep for it and can usually beat them through their own skill and understanding of chess. Grandmasters aren’t going to waste all of their time learning long variations of different dubious lines that never get played at the highest level and that they could probably beat anyway if they just played solid positional chess. This time would be better spent learning different variations of good openings that actually get played at the highest level. Even Magnus Carlsen, the world champion, played an objectively terrible line against the Stafford in a bullet game of his, which shows he clearly hadn’t prepped for it as otherwise he would have remembered that this was a terrible line.

[@robertplunkettschesslab]

A 2600 against 1700s and below. You could probably spot everyone 2 pawns and move your knight back and forth from it's original square and back again for the first 5 moves and still win. I don't consider this an endorsement for the opening, or really any opening.

[@ZedExGaming]

It isn't an endorsement and it's just a bit of fun my friend

[@robertplunkettschesslab]

@@ZedExGaming to each his own I guess.

[@maschngon]

I use the Stamford gambit most of the time. I lose more to it but when I win its an awesome high

[@kamakhyathakur599]

21:51

[@kamakhyathakur599]

22:34

[@kamakhyathakur599]

6:39