I'm 100% DONE with 100% Goggles. Here's why.

In this video I explain some recent issues I'm having with 100% tear-offs and ask for input from you all.
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. It doesn't cost you any extra but it helps support the channel when you use my Amazon links. Thanks!
www.amazon.com...

[@masonmartin7331]

Im having the exact same problem it is pissing me off!!!

[@inwardsolid02gaming86]

I noticed the change and thats when i made the switch to laminate tear offs and i feel in love with them i can put upwards of 30 on a pair of goggles if i need that much

[@vegasromaniac]

I have zero clue what you are talking about .. haha

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

It’s all because of mud… and racing. 😂

[@sfajita]

I run leatt 6.5 they are probably the best goggle I have used.

[@rl.skittleboy8970]

leatt goggles, and Blur optic goggles have kept everything out of my eyes. 100% suck

[@markgunnison]

It sucks when products change for the worst. Good demonstration.

[@gabepurtell1567]

Bet it’s a supplier issue. Not being able to obtain the same plastic they normally purchase or make, so like many manufacturers they substituted product. However if they admit it, or their customer support has no idea, they could be facing massive recalls hurting the profit margins

[@non-revrider8485]

Same problem, noticed I can’t run as many. Swapped to the laminated with a perimeter seal for the wet we get to solve both problems. Also any of my different style 100’s fog. Scott’s & Oak’s much better at not fogging. They offer better airflow vents.

[@TheJROC311]

Ive always used Oakley, mostly the cheaper O frames. They've always worked well. I tried one set of 100% and made one loop with them and gave them away to a friend. They fogged up on me pretty bad compared to Oakleys. I will say though with the O frame tear-offs I can only stack 3 or 4 before the clarity diminishes too much to be worth it. Never tried the higher end Oakley though or roll offs.

[@modsquad1670]

All of the %100 ones I’ve ever bought have the paper pieces in between each one, and I’ve been getting these since 2016. I didn’t know they sold thinner ones like that, mind you I’m in Canada.

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Thanks for that feedback. Maybe the thin ones I've been buying were just really old stock.

[@lostinpa-dadenduro7555]

I like the Leatt 6.5s.

[@wrenchone5003]

Oakley airbrake or Scott prospect for me with or without rolloff . I love both those.

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Thanks! It seems a lot of people really like both of those.

[@Scotland29]

I agree I recently purchased some from my local dealer and put on 4 and I could not see sh*t. (Not impressed) as I really enjoy the look and geometry of these goggles, hopefully it’s fixed in the future.

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

I found out after this video that Moose Racing and FMF both make tear offs for these goggles. The FMF ones are excellent.

[@_Bryant.R]

I'm a big fan of my Scott Prospects.

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Thanks!

[@jayrides718]

I currently use the Oakley Airbrakes with the tear offs and hands down the best Ive never had any issues with them and they are very very clear

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Thanks!

[@NicholasBrownC]

I used Scott Goggles for the longest time, but always ended up having trouble finding tear-offs and replacement lenses after a couple years. I recently switch to 100% because as you said, they're common as dirt and even my local bike repair shop sold the tear-offs. I've used a set of tear-offs one time with them, but had trouble with the ends of them sticking together meaning I'd pull 2-3 off at a time instead of just one. Haven't really tried running them again since then, and wasn't really impressed. I think I'm going to give the Oakley goggles a try next.

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

I know what you mean about them sticking together. I’ve always had to separate them completely prior to putting them on.

[@TimPaddy]

They're so different you'd think they're knockoffs. The company response is disappointing.

[@lincolnelliott4104]

I’ll never buy anything other than Scott! They have the best tear offs and roll off system of any pair! Scott’s are the way to go for sure!

[@kiwi-moto]

I have the Leatt roll off type of lens tape.seems to work good.maybe something else to look at?

[@jacksonmorris2523]

Love my Scott fury’s!

[@scottmilliron494]

I thought I got a set of the unlaminated tear offs that were marked as laminated. Glad I am not the only one to notice this! Thank you!!

[@BjorkOffroad]

Interesting. My kid wears the 100% youth googles and the tear offs are like your "newer" ones. I only put tear offs on his for protection of the lens, keeping them clean but have found any more than 3 really get difficult for me to see through. I have the Scott Fury (same lens as prospect) and havent had that issue.

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Thanks for that info. I may need to take a look at Scott.

[@jhammock13]

Was a 100% guy from the start. Recently experimented with Oakley Airbrakes and Scott Prospects. I've just sold all my 100%s to move to Scott. I had terrible fogging issues with Oakley. Scott fits my face better, has a wider field of view, doesn't fog, and the tear-offs work much better with the 2 post design.

[@lincolnelliott4104]

I did the same exact thing!

[@mudpup545]

Geez….really? I literally just ordered my first ever set of 100% goggles yesterday. 😡

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

It might be ok. I’ve gotten a lot of feedback here and on Facebook in the past 2 days. Others seem to have better luck with laminated tear offs but I also learned that Moose Racing makes tear offs to fit 100% goggles and they are reportedly very good. I’ve ordered some of those to try.

[@toohotcp]

Thanks for sharing! I was on the fence and not sure between the standard or perimeter laminated. I’ll avoid the standard for the time being. Hopefully they aren’t too bad

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

After posting this video I learned from others that Moose Racing and FMF make tear offs for these goggles. They are both much better than the 100% tear offs. Thanks for watching!

[@yarbles_]

Do these things dissolve or something? Just wondering what happens to them after they're torn off..

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

It's a clear plastic film so not sure how long it would take them to break down. When trail riding I typically pull one off while stopped and stuff it in a pocket. When racing it's about the only way to keep clear vision and stopping is not an option.

[@dirtsamplermx]

I use the laminated tear offs from 100% and have always loved them. I can even stack two laminated packs for a total of 14 pulls and see clearly with no issues. I saw you say below you had an issue with pulling them all off. I've done that once and it was only because I accidentally grabbed them where they were folded when I pulled them. As long as you make sure to only grab the end of the tearoff when you pull you shouldn't have any issues.

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Very helpful, thanks! I’m going to give them another try.

[@Henryve33s]

I just got some and they have been fine for me I can 5-6 before it gets pretty bad. Maybe try roll offs

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Thanks! I think I got spoiled by the old ones. They were great.

[@jounipohjolainen2687]

Scott Prospect/Fury are very good and many tear-off/roll off options are available. They use a 4 post tear-off system. Just make sure they fit the opening of your helmet as they are large (and don not pinch your nose).

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Thanks!

[@arromoredgood7420]

Scott gogles are great

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Thanks!

[@peggrav8190]

Leatt bulletproof. You'll never need tear-off again. Nothing sticks to the lenses

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Really?!? That’s awesome!

[@kiwi-moto]

@@DirtBikingwithDonnie I rock Leatt 6.5 and have a 5.5 set up with roll offs. Haven’t used the roll offs yet but they do look easy to use, usually I keep a soft rag in behind the plate to wipe off the goggles when it’s been wet.

[@brandonmcelroy5899]

I have a problem with air ventilation on goggles. I will have my contacts fall out with Scotts, 100%, thor, and a few others. Leatt is the only brand that almost completely cures that problem. And the lenses are next level strong.

[@kiwi-moto]

@@brandonmcelroy5899 totally agree.. seen a buddy get a branch above his eye once, its easy to pierce lenses, but the Leatts give me more confidence they will hold up

[@shoefly757]

In my honest opinion, I've always said 100% goggles were cheap garbage overpriced because of hype. Kids only bought them because they saw pros wearing them. Best goggle I've ran is Oakley Airbrake Rolloff system. My everyday pair is going on 5 years with original lense and I just purchased a second pair. Scott Prospects are a close second, but I've had a few issues with them.

[@shoefly757]

I don't mean to rag on 100% because I do know there are tons of people that do like them. But my experience with about 4 of their models has been bands stretching easily, easily scratched lenses, foam coming unglued, and their rolloff system is outdated. The airbrake can easily be changed from rolloff to tearoffs, but the roll off works so good I've never used the tearoffs. I will measure them tonight for thickness and let you know.

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

Thanks, I'm going to check into the airbrake rolloff system.

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

@@shoefly757 One thing that has steered me away from the 100% rolloffs is the side vision is severly limited. Do you notice the side vision being reduced with the airbrake rolloffs?

[@shoefly757]

@@DirtBikingwithDonnie Not at all, but I will say the updated ones I just bought do stick out maybe 1.5 mm more than the old style and I haven't ridden with them yet. They are expensive but like I said, other than film I haven't put a dime into the one pair for 5 years. The Scott Prospects can sometimes be had for $100 and is as close as I've found to the airbrake

[@jetiv41]

@@DirtBikingwithDonnie I have a pair of the 100% rolloffs, but they seem to get snagged on limbs and end up in a bird's nest. I prefer to wear those over tear offs when it's wet out but just isn't worth the aggravation..happened this past weekend matter of fact. I'm going to look into the Oakley's.

[@JacobSnover]

What do you think of the roll off system? Will you continue with tear offs on another brand, or switch to roll offs altogether?

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

I recently bought some roll off googles and I’ll use them when it’s really muddy or raining but they do limit peripheral vision quite a bit otherwise. I’d rather use standard tear offs when it’s not super muddy

[@JacobSnover]

@@DirtBikingwithDonnie Makes sense! Hope you find what you're looking for, thanks for the response!