You gotta account the fact that he isn't forced to take, nevertheless good job
@charalargenumber8327Ай бұрын
it forces a trade though which is good for the side with a material advantage (I know I'm sounding like the "aghtually" meme)
@ThatOneWeirdGalАй бұрын
@@charalargenumber8327 Yes exactly, not just a trade but then afterwards you can take his knight with your bishop and king can't take because of your queen. So even if the opponent doesn't fall for the bait and take your rook with his rook, you'd still be sacrificing your rook for both his rook and knight. It would be a 2 for 1. I think I saw that right.
@charalargenumber8327Ай бұрын
@@ThatOneWeirdGal Ke2 Rxd1 Rxd1 and the knight isn't lost
@ThatOneWeirdGalАй бұрын
@@charalargenumber8327 Oh, didn't catch that, good one!