i5 2500K vs i5 11400F - 10 Years Difference

[@TestingGames]

Games : Project Cars - 0:00 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesPCars Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1:05 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2 CYBERPUNK 2077 - 2:15 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077 Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:21 Days Gone - 4:41 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesDaysGone Hitman 3 - 5:57 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesHitman3 Battlefield V - 6:59 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesBF5 Death Stranding - 8:12 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesDeathStranding Horizon Zero Dawn - 9:28 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesH0D System: Windows 10 Pro Core i5 11400F 4.2GHz - bit.ly/3bqTyxL ASUS ROG Z590 Maximus XIII Hero - bit.ly/3m1kZSE 32Gb RAM DDR4 3600Mhz - bit.ly/2YmtsEA​ Core i5 2500K OC 4.2GHz - bit.ly/3yIVKdO ASRock Z77 Extreme4 - bit.ly/3wEOXjE 32Gb RAM DDR3 2133Mhz - bit.ly/3t4l9KN CPU Cooler - Zalman CNPS10X Performa - bit.ly/3f999kE GeForce RTX 3080 10GB - bit.ly/3hUikXp​ SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI

[@7heruvim7]

Man, where ac valhalla???

[@Pratik53101]

Please test GTX 1650 PLEASE..... Can it do ray tracing ? If yes, try with it

[@extremegamingdz1309]

Please compare i7 3770k with i7 10700

[@NatrajChaturvedi]

how come your gpu always runs so cool? You using water cooling? and what ambient temps?

[@extremegamingdz1309]

@@NatrajChaturvedi this my problem When I test my gpu its temperature reach 80"c but when I watch about it it does not even reach 65"c So he has better performance than my gpu

[@SlickR12345]

Considering its 6 cores vs 4 cores, I must say the 2500k is doing very well for a decade old CPU.

[@Mostan_Games]

4/4 vs 6/12, right?

[@samuraiwarrior96]

@@Mostan_Games 8 cores/12threads

[@jakobe_bryantgaming5580]

@@samuraiwarrior96 2500k is 4c/4t, i5 11400 is 6 core 12 thread

[@samuraiwarrior96]

@@jakobe_bryantgaming5580 FK MY BAD IM ALWAYS THOUGHT 8 CORES IT WAS I7

[@lyricaesthetic4324]

Sandy bridge is legendary

[@ZIPPERMEMES]

This shows that a good CPU will last way longer than a GPU from the same era. Great Benchmarks

[@positive_energy3131]

For gaming yes, for other tasks, like compiling, virtualization, video editing, compression, well it depends.

[@Icureditwithmybrain]

Well yeah, the GPU is the main thing that fills in the graphics, the CPU mainly just does the wireframe.

[@suntzu1409]

@@Icureditwithmybrain thats a lot of truth

[@SAINIDE]

That's why I think spending more in GPU is better than spending more in CPUs. If the rig is for gaming especially

[@Graphics_Card]

@@SAINIDE but if you are gonna play primarily games like csgo, then it would be the other way around

[@leoSaunders]

11400f > 2500k -- 1080p -- 1% fps 63% -- Project Cars - 0:00 236% -- Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1:05 286% -- CYBERPUNK 2077 - 2:15 158% -- Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:21 176% -- Days Gone - 4:41 119% -- Hitman 3 - 5:57 155% -- Battlefield V - 6:59 285% -- Death Stranding - 8:12 177% -- Horizon Zero Dawn - 9:28 184% -- 1% avg 36% -- Project Cars - 0:00 245% -- Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1:05 408% -- CYBERPUNK 2077 - 2:15 134% -- Call of Duty : Warzone - 3:21 100% -- Days Gone - 4:41 133% -- Hitman 3 - 5:57 63% -- Battlefield V - 6:59 495% -- Death Stranding - 8:12 225% -- Horizon Zero Dawn - 9:28 204% -- .1% avg

[@Marcos-zx6ey]

The real hero

[@BaH4o3eH]

while 150% more cores, 300% more threads

[@SweatyFeetGirl]

@@BaH4o3eH 150% more cores? 4 + 150% = 10 cores

[@BaH4o3eH]

@@SweatyFeetGirl yeah, you right, but you get the idea

[@jakobe_bryantgaming5580]

Lmao

[@joelferguson625]

Considering that the 2500k launched for about 220 the i5 2500k may be Intel's best budget to performance ratio CPU ever.

[@Nagib23_32]

Sandy Bridge was a legendary generation. It will be remembered forever

[@hugotakayama6963]

it should be the 11400f (6C / 12T) test with the core i7 3960x (6C 12T) set them at the same clock speed of the turbo core

[@Nagib23_32]

@@hugotakayama6963 This was mean to be a generation comparsion...

[@cazantrabant519]

3080: cmon grandpa, dont let me down, we need to deliver. 2500k: wait, I have to fart

[@myboah4764]

Ew I was eating chips

[@R_.709]

@@myboah4764 Omg you're so rich I haven't eaten chips since decades

[@ladboii2901]

@@R_.709 that means youre living a healthy life

[@rania_0128]

.

[@arjunraj3977]

Sandy Bridge was such a successful line up.. Still holds up very well even after 9 years

[@TheRightToFilmPolice]

It came out in 2011. Been 10 years, I put this in my pc back then when I built it. Still use it today.

[@brettnfk]

Been rocking my 2500k since 2011. Finally saying goodbye to it in July. But it, and my poor old GTX 580, have served me well these past 10 years.

[@icefoxxgaming]

What are you getting?

[@brettnfk]

@@icefoxxgaming Ryzen 5900x, 32gb RAM, and for now just a GTX 1660 Super with plans to upgrade to an RTX 4000 series card when they're available. Or possibly waiting a bit longer for the RTX 5000 range. Hoping this build will last me many years for my needs.

[@zackfair8407]

@@brettnfk get a 4080 when time comes , that shit will godstomp the current 3090😂

[@brettnfk]

@@zackfair8407 I feel like the 1660 Super might tie me over until the 5000 range of cards are available. So I'm aiming for a 5080 or 5090. Considering the 5090 because I'm getting more into 3D work, so that might be the better option. I'll see when they're all available.

[@zackfair8407]

@@brettnfk yeah , if 1660 super could last for that long , then 50 series will be the best option. Keep in mind however , that nvidia 40 series will be released with hopper architecture, and so will be the best price for performance GPU series since the 8800 gtx. I dont think there will be a huge gap between 40 series and 50 series , but that's only my thought obviously. In any case , you will get a beast😂

[@alxnd_r6345]

Its amazing how they still perform ok in a lot of new games 10 years later.

[@deadliftergo5985]

Best benchmark channel

[@AlexDeivid]

Last week I upgraded from i7 2600 to R5 5600x and it’s amazing how good is the i7 in modern games.

[@justinpatterson5291]

Some days I wish I just kept my 4770k and just bought the 2060 to put in it. Instead. I did a whole system rebuild. Feels a little like a waste seeing this.

[@r4v3nous31]

Double the fps is not a waste

[@samsonsanthosh]

You are getting quality of life improvements,power efficiency so it's not bad

[@miniweeddeerz1820]

oh it was not a waste. at all. this is nowhere close to the full picture of how much better a new computer feels to an old one. i would take an fx 8350 over that 2500k just for the threads.

[@justinpatterson5291]

Yeah after looking at the results. My system is definitely better with a 2600x. Over the old 4770k rig. I still want to do a cpu swap to something more updated.

[@miniweeddeerz1820]

@@justinpatterson5291 get yourself a 5800x if you get a decent deal and flash bios on what i assume is a b450

[@streetxgg]

i5 2500K is decade old CPU now! But still can handle some great titles 💪❤️. Still good at 60Hz gaming.

[@deleted9821]

I have i5 3470 better than 2500k maybe for 10% and it still rocks 1080p :D

[@iron_ghost733]

I have an i5 2500k and a amd hd 7970 its very nice for 60hz

[@gust4oki]

Not really ,if you match with a nvidia 500 series or amd hd cards(gpus of 2013) the 2500k will strugle a lot

[@trueneutral3092]

only 3-4x faster after 10 years. I remember the days when every 2-3 years, CPU speeds doubled.

[@trueneutral3092]

@Gustav Gamer you're right. but it sure does seem like every CPU since 2010 is basically the same.

[@jakobe_bryantgaming5580]

@@trueneutral3092 I think cpu's are still advancing fast enough to where developers for software are still trying to catch up imo. If they had time to catch up and master making more efficient software for current hardware, then there's even less need for more powerful cpu's sooner, even though more powerful cpu's are always welcome

[@franciscojavierregalado5176]

It isn't only raw force.

[@zangetsu6638]

@Gustav Gamer who cares about moore's law if the performance takes 8 years to double

[@wadimek116]

If you double the power its double in benchmarks or workload. Games dont scale well with stronger cpu

[@thecarl1013]

CPU Optimization in Days Gone is amazing

[@Digi20]

Having no SMT starts to hurt in some Games like Cyberpunk where 4 Threads are not enough. If you take a 2600k things start to improve quite a bit especially for the low 1%. Its crazy that a 10 Year old Chip can still totaly be used for gaming if you are fine in the 30-60fps region, where you will end up most of the time for gpu bound 4k gaming nevertheless.

[@Icureditwithmybrain]

i5-2500k can be purchased used for $30 USD

[@milanlikesbeer2410]

Definitely not the 3080 though hahaha

[@new2012pcgaming]

but u find an i3 10100 4/8 cores for 80-90 dollars, and u have ddr4 support and nvme

[@ELMO7TARAMQ8]

Why would you want to buy that. Its very old and you can get better performance with i3-10100F for $100 new. or even cheaper if you can find it used.

[@zangetsu6638]

@@ELMO7TARAMQ8 you can't think of a reason?

[@zangetsu6638]

@@ELMO7TARAMQ8 you *STILL* can't think of a reason? even one little reason?

[@luisguerreiro8045]

This test is perfect for it's purpose, but just for the sake of comparison I'd like to see how the 2500k handles todays heaviest games in higher resolutions, to see at which point of resolution increase the gpu becomes the bottleneck (I wonder if a 3570k or so would still be good for 4k today, had this processor almost a decade ago)

[@svyt59]

Эх, когда-то у интел почти на всех процессорах был разблокированный множитель...

[@СергейКубанцев-з4м]

Что? перепутали с АМД? )

[@cday131]

A mid range GPU is more likely to be paired with mid range CPUs. This is a high range GPU which will give more of a benefit to the 11400f. A 3060 would be a more realistic representation.

[@kerotomas1]

Considering the i5-2500k's current counterpart is the the 11600k, seeing this difference even with the 11400f is pretty good

[@therealist2000]

Would've loved to see 1440p comparisons !

[@readylucas]

Got my i7 3770k and 1660 chillin for another year or 2. Call me mad I'ma use it til it can't play new games at 1440p 60, which so far has not happened. I play vanguard, fortnite, minecraft, ark, and they can all run highish settings getting 60 GPS, with some tweaking I can get a stable 75 in just abt any game. Forza horizon runs exceptionally well at 1440p getting an average of 50-60 fps on ultra preset. I'm still satisfied with my 10 year old cpu. Yes it's bottlenecked but in most games it's minimal.. 10 percent bottleneck maybe after I've overcooked my cpu and tweaked settings.

[@Bruhmoment1962]

Intel K series cpus always doing a bottleneck if u was have i7 3770 without K its not doing bottleneck

[@GranulatedStuff]

Perfect test for my current situation ! Cheers

[@TheRightToFilmPolice]

This is the cpu I put in my first build(that I actually built myself) in 2011. Back then I would research processors on my downtime at work, and this was the one I settled on. I also ended up getting two gtx 480s that I used in sli, I got them for 300$ each open box at microcenter then used a 10% off coupon bringing them down to 530$. Two 480s at the time destroyed a 580 in several games and was about equal to a 680(aside from some games preffering to work on a single 480, but many worked better with sli enabled) anyways I still use this processor and pc today, but it now has a gtx 970 in it, and most likely will soon have a gtx 1070 or 1080 in it. Cheers.

[@4kmarvelclips454]

you better change cpu, you won't notice a big difference between gtx 970 and gtx 1070 because of huge cpu bottleneck.

[@MounMoun69]

The first CPU i bought with m'y own Money 2500k :)

[@Jacob_St_Louis]

For a ten years old cpu , is pretty good im impressed

[@sw1zzy940]

10 years and still running games over 60FPS

[@DanielOfRussia]

Solely thanks to the 3080, utilisation of which was clearly missed by your blind eyes. The % Lows and awful stutters too, all over the place. And here you are making this comment as if that's even a good thing lmao

[@zhila5958]

@@DanielOfRussia lol was about to say the same thing. having 60 fps and having stable 60 fps is two entirely different things people don’t seem to differentiate

[@sw1zzy940]

@@DanielOfRussia Yes the 2500k is still a good thing for low budget users Just pair it with a Gtx1650/Rx570 And u will be fine

[@DanielOfRussia]

@@sw1zzy940 Well if only with those or lower.

[@h1tzzYT]

@@sw1zzy940 I wouldn't say good, because in newest cpu demanding tittles 2500k will still stutter a lot, better pair those gpus with hyper threaded part either 2600(k or non k) or xeon e3-12xx part, 4c/4threads is just not enough anymore.

[@OACtrainer67]

i5 2500k still a very strong CPU!

[@hugotakayama6963]

Currently the amd fx 8350 processor achieves better fps than the 2500k and the i5 3470 today, 10 years ago it was the other way around, the fx 8350 aged better through time in gaming and not to mention video editing that was just there with The 3770k, with respect to the core i5 3570k this processor should be 3% higher than the 2500K, yes it is also the case, the fx 8350 surpasses it today 2021, although there are games and titles from 2019. kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y53YYpuYnqaKqaM

[@xtrzgames862]

strong then my ryzen 3 1200

[@misterPAINMAKER]

Not much of an improvement. 😏 In the 2001 every 3 years you had to buy a new PC.

[@GameIsMyOxygen]

Not much of an improvement? Dont get me wrong i love the 2500k but thats a difference of 60+ fps we are seeing, in some games even 100 fps. 2500k is bottlenecking the gpu hardd

[@MarcysFail]

@@GameIsMyOxygen Yes not much, 11400F its 6/12 CPU and 2500K its 4/4. ! Its 10 years ! And only 0,5x5 time faster CPU, wen we set -33% 6v4 cores, we get x0,35 to x3,5 time faster CPU. Now we need cut dowm HT so we get max 3 Times faster CPU in Games ... in 10 years ? It should be like this 2500K in next 2 year new CPU should be x2 faster etc. After 10 years 11400F should be x32 time faster then 2500K ! Its only maks x0,3 to x3 faster ! In the perfect world as in 90-2008 the power of PC goes up very fast.

[@GameIsMyOxygen]

@@MarcysFail then will you keep playing with such a bottleneck? I mean if there's not much improvement then you should stay on 2500k. Losing 100 FPS is a big deal and not something that's "not much of an improvement". 2500k was legendary but it's days are long long gone. Nobody should pair this CPU with an rtx card.

[@veduci22]

@@GameIsMyOxygen Not everyone needs to play newest derivative AAA action games and for 95% of other games it can get 60+ average fps and that's still fine for lot of people.

[@GameIsMyOxygen]

@@veduci22 @Insomniul totally agree with you. In fact I don't even have any new specs. I rock an i7 3770 non K which performs as good as a fully oc 2500k, and an Rx 480, and I'm happy for now. But my point is that there is definitely alot of improvement in CPU technology. The 2500k was a big beast but with newer release games and stronger GPUs it just can't compete with what the latest CPUs have to offer. My original reply was just regarding that. That saying that CPUs of today are "not that much improvement" compared to capable yet old 2500k is a quite an overstatement

[@Dexion845]

This is a LEGENDARY CPU. I reember having this and overclocking it to 4.2GHz stable on just air.

[@kraptastic333]

Still gaming on i5 2500k with gtx 1070 and 32gb ram.. I won't give this machine up, it will become a music production station or a nas box because of the burly quad core

[@Richdadful]

Now overclock the 2500k to 4.8 ghz and bam.

[@MDiNGG]

Im upgrading from my 2500k to the 11400f after 10 years It held up great still could play battlefield on it

[@monkeslayer-km5ho]

The cpu usage told us that 4c/4t is not enough in 2020s era (and later) Minimum is 4c/8t

[@hugotakayama6963]

Red Dead Redemption : Fx 8350+ RTX 3080= 75 fps, Core i5 2500k +rtx 3080 = 59fps

[@mohamedkhamis387]

I had fx 8350 and rx 580 8g msi and i have problem in pubg emulator what should I do ?

[@darkraft100]

That i5 2500k is still on it's legs, just needs some oc, if you are on a budget...

[@AK-tf3fc]

I5 2500 are sold 100 dollars in India

[@TheClearStalker]

Not even 6ghz would save that 4 core obsolete chip

[@darkraft100]

@@AK-tf3fc at that point that is a no no

[@darkraft100]

@@TheClearStalker well, someone with an i5 2500k would not have a 3080, considerimg the high gpu prices

[@ThisRandomGuyYouDidntNotice]

Although that 2500k hits decent FPS, an RTX30 gpu seems to be bottlenecked hard. In many games you see CPU util. >90% and GPU util.

[@gytispranskunas4984]

It took 10 years to make cpu that have only 2 times the performance... And if you go high resolution it's even less of a difference.

[@rbk9582]

2 times?

[@nosdursparta4738]

11400f gets 2,5~3 times difference working at 70~80% while 2500k works at 99% with some stutterings, not too bad at all

[@gaurnarsar3888]

To the ones saying that a 2500k is still a good cpu, it is but only for entry level systems. Also intel has come far, as they are delivering more than twice the perf at the same power consumption levels

[@LSK2K]

The i9 9900K is 1.2 times faster than the Ryzen 5 3600 lmao

[@DanielOfRussia]

@@LSK2K False info my dude, it's obviously a way faster chip than whatever it is you just brought up

[@LSK2K]

@@DanielOfRussia checkout the benchmarks.

[@Peremptor]

The lack of threads really hurts the 2500k in modern games... at similar clocks the 2600k would be a sizable improvement.

[@tommaso8517]

Basing on RDR2 results, we can say that a CPU (in this case i5 2500K loses about 5,5% performance per year in gaming, while a GPU loses about 10% performance per year, and all this results are in "low" resolution (1080P)and medium settings so at high resolution a CPU loses less performances. So that's the final proof that when you make a gaming PC the most of your budget have to go to GPU. So people that make PC for 1500€$ with 5600x and 3070 are a bit stupid when they can make a PC for only 1000€$ with 10400/3600/11400 with similar performancs in gaming

[@highlandertokio82]

Irony is that 2500k numbers are stil good for 60hz gaming...

[@robii3923]

No, it's not. Look at 1% low. It almost never reaches 60 fps so you'll feel constant lag and slowness in gameplay.

[@yancgc5098]

@@robii3923 Locking the FPS to 60fps should help in reducing the stuttering so it’s fine

[@alexgarry7518]

Maybe i5 2500K has around 60 fps but look on his cruel frametime.

[@TheRewers78]

Yeah and the 1% and 0,1% lows are terrible too.

[@TheRewers78]

60fps yea, but not stable 60fps.

[@mrbabygaming]

Amazing testing videos sir 😊

[@zangetsu6638]

Avg fps increase: 67% Project Cars 174% Red Dead Redemption 2 165% CYBERPUNK 2077 164% Call of Duty : Warzone 124% Days Gone 115% Hitman 3 85% Battlefield V 84% Death Stranding 93% Horizon Zero Dawn

[@zangetsu6638]

geomean: 113% increase in ten years

[@kauczuk4006]

Now you should make procentage differences noted betwen cpu's and make this same tests in 4k. In 4k differences will be much more lower and this will realy show that 2600k is still good cpu.

[@jshico3417]

That's not how a CPU benchmark works, it wouldn't prove anything because the results will be bound by the GPU instead. This test shows roughly the max fps you can expect regardless of resolution

[@kauczuk4006]

@@jshico3417 yes you are right. I like to play games in 4k, older games like split second. Me andromeda, nfs... So, if you make test of cpu in 2021 you need to do this in 4k. Thats why 4k tests are also importanat.

[@readylucas]

The rtx 3080 is an extreme example. you can build a pc with the i52500 with used parts less than 300 dollars, and then slot in a 1660 super or even a 2070 and the bottleneck is minimal. legendary processor

[@FoxyCAMTV]

Only problem is pcie 3.0 motherboards lile z77 and b75s are impossible to find anymore.....i only see h61s

[@readylucas]

@@FoxyCAMTV you can find my mobo used for around 80 dollars or so. P8z77 lx. 150 dollars or more for one in newish condition or refurbished. Not sure if it has pcie 3.0 but it's never given me and issue for the 7 years I've used it. Reliable stuff in my opinion. General summary of my build, not sure what the psu is or storage. P8z77- v lx I7 3770k 16 gb 1866 ddr3 1660 xc black gaming I do understand with something like an i7 3770k I'm barely keeping up, but it's doing a lot better than the i52500 I had when I first built the pc.

[@scavengerspc]

If you need to put something like this together get a 2600K. Double the threads and it makes a *BIG* differance.

[@m8x425]

A big reason the 2500k is getting decimated is because it lacks threads. I'd like to see a CPU like the Core i7-3930k, E5-1660, or E5-2687 which has 6 or 8 cores with Hyperthreading because these CPU's would show how the Sandy Bridge Architecture is holding up against Rocket Lake or Zen 3.

[@Garth2011]

L2 and L3 cache memory quantity has much to do with the newer CPU's performance. Even so, the 2500K performs darn good for what it has.

[@hugotakayama6963]

CYBERPUNK 2077: Fx 8350+RTX 3080= 57 fps , Core i52500k + Rtx 3080= 46 fps

[@FNRUST]

2500K is actually running Cyberpunk 50FPS is mad

[@JustAGuy85]

Also, to put things into perspective for when you're on a 6c/12t CPU... When you look up and see your CPU usage at 33%, that means a 4c/4t CPU would be at 100%. When you're at 66%, that's 8 threads worth. I mean, sure, things can vary overall but it's pretty close.

[@amitujigamer3646]

Plz make videos with mid range graphic card too for mid range pc (1050ti rx570) etc plzzzzz.....😁❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@slippinjimmy3961]

I got a 2500k from cex for £18 runs any game very well, no need to upgrade

[@simiseta833]

It seems like : Boss I5-2500k: " It's just a little work, let me handle it, you (Salaryman GPU) demand so much cash! " ( power consume - W ) --> CPU: Full Load 99-100% - 81W, GPU: Load 30-40% - 120W. Boss i5 -11400f: " Nah, It's not worrying about it, I'll take a small piece of cake, you ( salaryman GPU) can take the rest! " --> CPU: Load 40-45% - 81W, Salaryman GPU: Load 70-80% - 250W. Haha... It's a joke.

[@Flanker-NineZero]

The poor 2500K is working it's arse off while the 3080 is there chilling at about 35-40% usage haha. I've got the 3570K running at 4.2GHz. Great chip but I'm itching to upgrade - especially since I'm also running DDR3 RAM.

[@hugotakayama6963]

i5 2500k el procesador que su actual reemplazo luegode 10 años es el 11600k. , por consiguiente el 11500 reemplaza luego de 10 años al 2400, el 11400 su contraparte del 2011 es el core i5 2300.

[@chanalex5686]

wow, 2500k is still a beast, I think the result will be more close if the GPU not a very hgh, and to be honest, it is very less improvement from 6th Gen to 11th Gen for intel, and many bug in using 12th, therefore 2th & 3th Gen of intel I-core shall be the peak product in feeling "Upgrade" for computer

[@hugotakayama6963]

Battlefield V - Fx 8350+Rtx 3080= 81 fps, core i5 2500k + rtx 3080 =86 fps

[@therealist2000]

I've got the non-k version in a HP 8200 and it's slow af these days, it's time to upgrade!

[@danieldaniel1210]

Your hdd is slow af

[@hugotakayama6963]

2500k si se le coloca en velocidad stock va a rendir mucho menos, pero también su consumo disminuye, en ese caso energéticamente el 2500k si no se le hace nada de overclock va a seer mas eficiente que el 11400f

[@Dr.D00p]

The fact that Intel did nothing but sit on its complacent arse, counting the money for 5 of those 10yrs, whilst AMD was absent from the performance CPU sector, somewhat skews the seeming lack of progress in CPU performance over the decade.

[@spawnersiak]

Still have my old i7 920 with MSI Eclipse SLI and GTX 260 Lightning xD But my nephew uses it when he comes to my home. I must say that my old PC i far louder than my new PC, even both are custom liquid cooled xD

[@bodorsofttv360]

i5 2500k legendary! :)

[@Shurup33]

was 6 years ago now its piece of poo

[@addictedtosynthwave8151]

@@Shurup33 in all games more than 60fps piece of poo?? Did you miss something? OMEGALUL

[@pangeran_excellion]

@@addictedtosynthwave8151 no it is a piece of poo my pentium runs games at 85 fps gpu is intel HD 630 + RTX 1080TI 85 fps go brrrr -------------------------------------------------- and i have another one with core i3 10100F + radeon RX5700 94 fps in most gameplay 2500k is a piece of poo

[@addictedtosynthwave8151]

@@pangeran_excellion You have also 0 idea how PC works right?? On both of your setups you have a big bottleneck OMEGALUL shit setups dude.

[@addictedtosynthwave8151]

@@pangeran_excellion CPU and GPU have to be in the same categorie.. Not 2 core 3ghz and 3080 you idiot

[@invisiblealex007]

I just started to struggle with my i5-4440 because of freezing, but still have performance around 50-90 fps, depends of game (with GTX1070) .... are you sure that is truly 2500k?

[@banana-vo6bx]

That 2500K is OCed

[@nikmuhammad7362]

Sandy bridge still good till this day.i got 2500 non K, pair with 1050ti, still good for gaming low-med setting for some AAA games.

[@Gamevet]

All 2500K CPUs can hit 4.7 Ghz on air. It might not have made that much of a difference, but it probably would have added about 5 to 6 fps.

[@m8x425]

No they couldn't. I had both a 2500k and 2600k that struggled to hit 4.6Ghz, and 4.5Ghz was the sweet spot for those two processors. But my original 2600k could hit 4.8GHz with relative ease, and I had my hands on a 2700k that could do 4.9GHz. Same with the i7-3770k. I put one in my bro's system that could do 4.6GHz at 1.315v, and I had a gem that could do 4.7GHz with 1.295v, and 4.8GHz with 1.35v. Had to delid that one and replace the paste with Conductonaut.

[@Gamevet]

@@m8x425 Maybe you had some sub-par motherboards that couldn't deliver clean enough power to the CPU. Here's my 2500K running at 4.8 Ghz, while playing Far Cry 5. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bYTQfmljodNqeMU

[@ghosts12333]

Thank you

[@scupking]

I just ordered a RX 6650 XT to pair with my i5 2500k (4.5Ghz). It will replace my current Nvidia GTX 770.

[@mirage8753]

would be nice to see i5 2500k vs fx 8*** since they were the same price back in a day

[@travelguide2197]

still using i5 2500k @ 4.3ghz now switching to newer cpu

[@efrenzgz]

which program u use for monitoring? thx¡

[@robertdaone]

Not as good as the 11th gen I5 but still good and playable for an old CPU. I'm running a 3rd gen I7 along with a GTX 1660 and can play everything I throw at it in med to high settings.

[@readylucas]

ikr. i5 2500 non k here. @3.914 ghz blk overclock, 16 gbs of ram, and a 1660. fortnite high settings 60-80 fps, ark survival high settings 40-60 fps, battlefield V even runs on max settings 40-50 fps at 1440p. the i5 2500, i72600, and i73770k are legendary cpus. they can be purchased for extremely cheap now and its a great way to build a beast of a computer. Its like cars sometimes the newer modles are only slightly better and your waisting ur money getting rid of something that works.

[@robertdaone]

@@readylucas Yah I plan on keeping my old rig for a few more years hopefully because I like my current set up. The only thing is microsoft is purposely making all the older processors not compatible with Windows 11 on purpose. Hopefully game developers will keep supporting window 10 a few more years at least.

[@ProcessedDigitally]

that is a huge leap!

[@xorkatoss]

I'm so glad I upgraded my ancient i5-2310 to a Ryzen 5 1600AF 😂

[@koosvaneijck]

ryzen 5 1600 why?

[@onoffgeorg9828]

i5 3470 for 780,980,2060😂😂😂 in 2025.. when gpus will cost less than 150 dollars😂😂

[@gvi341984]

This is the reason why you buy Intel cpus because they have constant hardware support because of prebuilts

[@pangeran_excellion]

@@khoado2060 but 2019 can be better than 2021? same performance less price.

[@DerAllEine]

I would like to see that CPU comparison with a minor GPU like 1050 Ti.

[@lou5368]

the 1050ti will bottleneck even the 2500k in majority of games

[@delanis4830]

2500k only 5ghz& ddr3 2300mhz

[@chamda]

For 60hz monitors 2500k is a good deal

[@mypfpiswhatourphonesees4294]

if you're really desperate then maybe, but buying an old cpu that is still on the ddr3 platform is just a waste. You can get a new i3 10100 or 11100 for cheaper i believe and also the ryzen 3 3100 or 3300x.

[@dharkbizkit]

here its just the fps difference. my wife tried to play detroit with an 6600k. 4 core 4 threads. it was a nightmare, so much stutter, sometimes 2 seconds without any new frame. frametimes were all over the place. some games get hit HARD by old, underpowered cpus

[@SAINIDE]

Crying with my i3 2367m in the corner

[@АлександрВавилкин-л4е]

Lower graphics would show more difference I guess. 11th Intel was only 50-70% load

[@hugotakayama6963]

Call of Duty : Warzone : Fx 8350+ RTX 3080 = 78 fps core i5 2500k +rtx 3080= 59 fps ( 3:27 )

[@hurairaqureshi1031]

Impressive x2-x2.5 the difference, and the only normal cpu from Intel...

[@FantasyNero]

10 years 3 times the power not much. We just waste 10 years, feeling like upgrade 3 years newer :(

[@plablolxd]

Since 11400F can't be overclocked, it's wrong to compare it to an overclockeable CPU, even if it is old. The only fair way is to compare both stock frequencies

[@monkeslayer-km5ho]

Bro without oc,the 2500k will be far more worse

[@Илья-ц7ш5ч]

Есть ещё порох в пороховницах!

[@Pro_Komp]

2500k разгонять нужно, все камни (даже самые неудачные) спокойно берут частоту 4.2ггц, некоторые держат 4.5-4.6 или даже выше и вот только в этом случае раскрывается его потенциал. на сток частотах он ничего не вывозит)

[@markuslevente8915]

The I5-2500k can't use out the rtx 3080 much as the I5-11400F. That's why the fps is so low at the 2500k side

[@Nazzah1994]

I'm still running one. Can't fault it.

[@lubohancar7467]

2500K standart have only 2. gen PCIe lanes with Z68 based boards (PCIe gen 3.0 Z77).

[@hrvojevuna248]

also in this video cpu i5 2500k is using 77w only, i can push mine onto 115w stable on z77 so those games that are close to 60 fps would be over 60 with good chipset

[@zmb5501]

I feel like a 2500k would be a good pair for like an rx580

[@yancgc5098]

They are a good pair

[@yancgc5098]

@@khoado2060 AMD GPUs have less driver overhead than Nvidia GPUs, so the RX 580 and 2500K still make an OK enough pairing

[@vanyasidorov5161]

Sorry 2500k. Your time is gone. Sweet dreams dear prince...

[@bleazertm7698]

i thought the GT 525m was the problem, but actually it's my i7 2670 the real problem . . . . Plot twist : the poverty is my real problem

[@gameotic1]

After watching this I think I don't have to upgrade my i5 8400. All is need is upgrade my gpu(1060 6gb) when those become affordable.

[@abodakour5468]

I still have my i5 9400f and its still doing well :D

[@mathew5433]

30 - 40 percent usage but on the same Degree...wow

[@Felipejcp89]

2500K is a good processor, but a little bit tired for the new generation.