Only video I found on this subject which gives full engineering details. Just spot on. I loved it.
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
I'm really glad to hear that you liked the content.
@prabhatsahoo75352 жыл бұрын
Very lucidly explained. Pros and Cons are nicely explained
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I'm glad you liked it.
@mandarmoksha3 жыл бұрын
Big fan of your work Lain... Thank you!
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
That's great to hear. Glad you like the videos.
@王大維-w4t3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot! I’ve been waiting for this a while
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help!
@neelanjanasubinferdous81383 жыл бұрын
Respected Sir, Thank You so much for such nice informative videos. Really very helpful.
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Glad you like them.
@jainpakpoom3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. All your videos have really been helpful and informative.
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad!
@plastilinovbly8 ай бұрын
Great video!
@prisharocks2 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation! Well done 👍🏻
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@omar7783 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@thijsherbold79963 жыл бұрын
This video helped a lot, thanks!
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped!
@joeb990710 ай бұрын
Atmospheric and moisture absorption goes up with frequency. This reduces the coherence bandwidth as well the range. Availability is reduced significantly. The trade becomes cell size reduction which increases the need for smaller cell size and more of them per service area. There is a practical limit as frequency used goes up and it is reached quickly as a function of RF frequency. Increased transmit power and or antenna gain does not overcome this as phase coherence is lost before SNR goes below minimum detectable signal levels. Antenna cross polarization/ depolarization at the antenna also is severly degraded due to droplet size of moisture within the field of regard of the antenna array and each formed beam. Remedies are non trivial. The design trades have to address this above 10 ghz to determine feasible system designs.
@unrmaestro3 жыл бұрын
ty sir
@jeewithbanerjee11602 жыл бұрын
Please cover reconfigurable intelligent surfaces
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion. I've got it on my "to do" list.
@nelsonmakeketa61883 жыл бұрын
Good Stuff thanks you soo much sir had to refresh my knowledge.
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
Glad to help.
@malini5011 ай бұрын
Hi Sir! In Hybrid beam forming when you say x antennas have same theta(phase), how all three will transmit/receive at a time? already the beams are narrow. Please elaborate.
@pitmaler4439 Жыл бұрын
In dig. beamforming we have the RF chain after the processing, that's clear. Does that RFchain includes the FFT or IFFT? Or there just converters, filters, amplifiers,....? Thank you.
@iain_explains Жыл бұрын
Just converters, filters, amplifiers,....
@shahriarsowad92219 ай бұрын
Prof. Is there any particular book you will suggest to learn all the basics of MIMO communication ?
@iain_explains9 ай бұрын
This one is good: B. Clerckx and C. Oestges, "MIMO Wireless Networks: Channels, Techniques and Standards for Multi-Antenna, Multi-User and Multi-Cell Systems"
@lakshmikandula634 Жыл бұрын
prof can you please explain how increment in carrier frequency leads to bandwidth increment ?
@iain_explains Жыл бұрын
It depends on what "bandwidth" you are referring to. I'll add this topic to my "to do" list for a future video.
@lakshmikandula634 Жыл бұрын
@@iain_explainsthank you sir.
@한두혁2 жыл бұрын
Hello I have a question. In 1:25 you said that carrier freq and bandwidth are proportional & inverse proportionality of optimal radiating size. How can I understand this?
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
It's complicated. My comment was a generalisation. Generally speaking, the lower frequencies propagate better in terrestrial communication systems, so they are more "in demand". The higher frequencies are less "in demand", and since there are fewer users, it's possible for them each to use wider bandwidths. Also it's harder to design "narrow band" band pass filters at higher carrier frequencies. To understand the relationship between the spacing of the antenna elements and the optimal energy transfer requires electromagnetic antenna theory.
@한두혁2 жыл бұрын
@@iain_explains do you have any book recommendation?
@mopol44003 жыл бұрын
Hi doctor first thanks for all these information Mr i have a question witch is favorable propagation is when the channel responses from the base station to user terminals are mutually orthogonal ? what is mutually orthogonal?
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
Mutually orthogonal means that all users are orthogonal to each other. Basically it means that the H matrix is invertable. This video may help: "What is Multi-User MIMO Communications (MU MIMO)?" kzbin.info/www/bejne/Zp_GeoqindioZ6M
@bouchibanefatmazohra14853 жыл бұрын
It's helpfull..thanks a lot 😊
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
Glad you found it useful.
@wiseshouse82302 жыл бұрын
hello sir thanks to your informative videos, but i got a question here, why is in some books they say the massive mimo is the systems focus on adding a much higher number of antennas on the base station,
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
"Massive MIMO" is a very loose term. It gets used in quite a few situations. Basically any communication system where a large number of antenna elements are used at one or other end of the link (or both) gets called "massive MIMO". And there's no specific definition of "large number".
@wumeng86192 жыл бұрын
Hi Prof! As MIMO requires rich scattering environment, does it mean that narrower beams from gNB with large N to UE with small M isn’t suitable for high rank transmissions as the effective BFed channel becomes sparse such that there is insufficient scatterers around the UE to decorrelate the channel? (TX correlation is assumed less problematic considering orthogonal beams to transmit multiple layers)
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
Well, it depends on exactly what you mean by "MIMO". In the early days, "MIMO" was used to describe "spatial multiplexing", but these days it is much more general, and literally refers to any system with multiple transmit and multiple receive antennas (even if the receive antennas are each on a different user, as in MU-MIMO). You might like to watch: "What are Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing in MIMO?" kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3-kYaukbKqYr7s
@wumeng86192 жыл бұрын
@@iain_explains thanks a lot for your prompt reply! yes I have checked that one (and most of the others of your videos :-)) Here I meant spatial multiplexing for high rank transmission. Considering above dimension of e.g. N=32 and M=2, two beams carrying two layers respectively, would it be problematic with too large N such that the beams get too narrow yielding in the propagation channel too less scatterers around RX and making receive correlation too high for rank2 transmissions? You mentioned less "multi-path diversity", did you mean this increased correlation or frequency selectivity channel coding exploits?
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
It all depends on the gain of the individual paths and their relative directions. The larger the number of antennas, the more accurately the paths can be resolved, and the more power that gets directed in those specific directions. In terms of the number of data streams (or "layers"), just because you might only have two data streams, doesn't mean you only use two of the available "paths" in the channel. The "effective beams" that get formed for each data stream can be "multi-fingered".
@윤덕호-g9v16 сағат бұрын
done
@TejasGaga3 жыл бұрын
Respected Sir, Very good video.. very informative....Kindly make one video on Modelling Massive MIMO mathematically as compared to MIMO modelling Like y=Hx+n in case of MIMO.(Request)
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion. I'll add it to the list.
@Oshea733 жыл бұрын
wow very nice channel
@iain_explains3 жыл бұрын
Thanks and welcome
@lancecruwys21772 жыл бұрын
I'm probably confused here but don't we want reduced multipath diversity as that would cause more distortion the higher it is?
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
It depends on whether you can use the diversity to your advantage. If you are not using it, then it will look like distortion, and be a problem for you. But if you are doing cleaver signal processing, then you can make use of it, and it's not "distortion". This video might help: "What are Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing in MIMO?" kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3-kYaukbKqYr7s
@lancecruwys21772 жыл бұрын
@@iain_explains Thank you for all your videos. I find signals and comm theory to be both the most challenging and interesting of the EE field, and your videos have been exceptionally useful. Also it's nice that they're free. Thank you again!
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your nice comment. I'm so glad that you have found the videos helpful.
@sabertooth212 жыл бұрын
This channel is only for professors i guess coz I'm not able to understand a single term from it😭😭
@iain_explains2 жыл бұрын
Well yes, some of the videos do assume a certain level of prior knowledge. But many/most of the videos are intended for beginners/interested people. You might like to check out some of the Playlists on the channel, or go to the following website and take a look at the topics listed in categorised order (from most basic/introductory, to more advanced): iaincollings.com