ICOM will charge 100% more than the cost of the IC-7610 even though the BOM is 50%
@ramonpe1ouwАй бұрын
No doubts here about the high quality but... such a pitty that Icom keeps applying glossy parts in the front panel. All matt would be so much nicer (like the IC-7200).
@Bernard-JohnАй бұрын
hi ,thanks for the video,nice looking radio the second screen looks interesting, but i think i will stick with my Icom 7610, 73 from Rotterdam......
@m0kyw115Ай бұрын
Hi, you`re welcome, glad you liked it. Indeed I like very much my IC-7610, it's a very pleasant transceiver to use with very nice features and great performance. Check out this interesting video about the IC-7760 as well from Wimo... kzbin.info/www/bejne/q2GaY3qZaN-CfKc 73's
@mwalters695Ай бұрын
Nice one, thankyou for the video. martin - 2e0 mdh
@m0kyw115Ай бұрын
Hello, I'm glad you liked it. Check out this interesting video about the IC-7760 as well from Wimo... kzbin.info/www/bejne/q2GaY3qZaN-CfKc 73's
@SpookiehamАй бұрын
Very nice and the split box is a winner but that little display up on the right doesnt look right
@AllthingsradioАй бұрын
Over priced radio in my opinion looks nice but my radio does exactly the same thing your 5 and 9 end of !
@super-8Ай бұрын
Atente Frequente - alter Schwede...
@M0WWSАй бұрын
ICOM knocks it out the park once again. Yaesu and Kenwood might as well just pack up now.
@KibwungaАй бұрын
Ummm.... Yaesu is top of the list for what matters with receivers. And personally, having both, the Yaesu implementation of QRM fighting features is much nicer. And there is no better built rig than a TS-890, and it posts better numbers than Icom. Even the flagship 7851. Sorry man, Icom makes a great rig but Yaesu and Kenwood aint scared :)
@M0WWSАй бұрын
@@Kibwunga noted. Many thanks
@Jonshome337Ай бұрын
Sorry but the build quality of a Kenwood to a Icom you cannot compare ....
@KibwungaАй бұрын
@@Jonshome337 yeah you are right. Kenwood build is much better :)