Why is the NEW Rolex Sea-Dweller 126600 Important?

[@ID-Guy]

Channel Support - Patreon: www.patreon.com/idguy Latest Releases: kzbin.info/door/zf6rqsEBni5G2TSevD6F4Afeatured Follow me on Instagram: instagram.com/id.guy/

[@champeight6737]

I love the 126600. Most underrated modern Rolex. Keeper.

[@SavedbybGrace]

Yep Love mine.

[@sgoggans]

I daily wear the SD43 (my old eyes appreciate the cyclops), i also have 20+ dives with it. much to my wife's concern, (but hey that's what insurance is for). I don't go 4000ft of course, most dives are 100ft or less, but to me and my 7.5 inch wrists, it fits better than the older SD/Sub models. Plus I'm a sucker for the red line of text.

[@jda7499]

Wish u many more dives buddy, Enjoy it in good health. Can wait to get mine - 2 months more ?

[@djdc81]

I can't wait to get mine

[@brianbauman8875]

My first Rolex was a 16600 back in 92. When the new 126600 was introduced at Basel 2017, I knew I had to have it. My AD came through and it was delivered just before my 50th birthday giving it special meaning as the reference pays homage to the original single red SeaDweller from 1967.

[@SuperGossy]

Great video....Traded in my sub and bought the SD43.. it’s really is the perfect size at 43, Rolex needed to differentiate it from the 40mm sub..the watches overall proportions are spot on .. tapered lugs, tapered bracelet and that single red line..it also wears smaller that you think, I for one love it.

[@ID-Guy]

Well said Paul. The jump to 43 put the watch into a different category (where it always has been) Part of me loves the idea of a "sleeper" Sea-Dweller @ 40mm's... I'd jump on a 16600 or a 116600 in a heartbeat, but this new reference has pushed the name further. I got to try one on and loved the proportions, but the lugs felt too close to the limit of my wrist (sadly) Still, such a stellar watch and thank you for the comment! Wear the beaut in good health!

[@majestic1260]

I did the same thing 3 months ago and have no regrets 👍

[@smithtotiemsri8250]

Feel the same way. Wearing it right now.

[@scottsj4625]

It was made for serious diving as a backup watch to the diving computer. Yet some wear it as an everyday watch. The water resistance is amazing.

[@ID-Guy]

And the 43mm size fits the application ;) Thank you as always for the comment Scott!

[@lear60man]

This is the first new Rolex Ive felt drawn to in years. Love it and it gets a lot of wrist time.

[@ID-Guy]

What really makes it stand out to me is that they nailed the proportions. It isn't following a super-case styling and with it having all of those small nuances like a matte dial, red print, graduated bezel... it's a stunning addition. Thanks for the comment brother!

[@nzotopa7403]

Im in love with my SD43 its really a stunning watch !

[@YippeeKiYayMrFalcon]

Its not all that difficult to put together actually. I remember the first time that I saw a Sea Dweller and its lack of a cyclops lens was an immediately noticed aberration. It didn't appear normal because it was obviously missing its cyclops and THAT was a strange thing. It has become normalized to us over the years so that now we have come to expect the SD to not have its cyclops lens, but that isn't what Rolex originally intended. The technology just wasn't there at the time, but it is now. The strange thing is that now that the technology has allowed for the Sea Dweller to finally get its cyclops lens, and for it to still be functionally sound and still remain in tact at extreme depths, people think THAT is the deviation and something to be abhorred. Well, its not. The reality is that the SD was long overdue for a cyclops lens and now thankfully, it finally has one.

[@rootedrotor525]

Bought the 126600 last month. Love it. Thanks for another great vid ID.

[@ID-Guy]

I'm so glad you'r enjoying it, Rooted! I got to try one on recently. Though the size doesn't "visually" fit my wrist (I think the lugs span a bit too far to the edge on me), its proportions, scale, use of space is top notch! Thanks as always for the comment brother

[@SVH89]

Bought me an unpolished 116600 in may 2019 as an enjoyable investment. Prices already increased by 10% since then.

[@MHPPJdeida]

I think since I put the SD43 on my wrist ... my other Rolex watches seem off ... I mean they feel like toys ... the presence of this watch and the perfection in dimensions is stunning .... it is a perfect watch. Great review as usual.

[@SuperGossy]

MHPPJdeida my sentiments as well... it’s just perfect

[@SavedbybGrace]

Agree. My fave Rolex of all time. Previously owned the Batgirl, seriously nice. SD43 is better though.

[@bentleygt3716]

when i heard about the SD34 release . i was over the moon and had to have it. i enjoy wearing this watch a lot . LOVE it. i really wish Rolex make a GMT Pepsi or Batman in 43mm case as well. Great review, thank you.

[@bak2mb]

ill be all over it if they have the GMT ceramic in 43mm

[@Nexus.Achiles]

Not being a fan of the supercase and the 40mm size in a diver, I jumped at the opportunity to get my hands on the first SD43 to land at my local AD back in May 17. I loved it on my 18cm/7in wrist. It looked perfect to me. A large 5 digit Sub of sorts. Almost 3 years later I can now say I was extremely lucky that day. Indeed what I like the most about the Sea-Dweller is it was always meant to be a Super Submariner at its core, one that wouldn't have the crystal pop out when decompressing in a diving bell, one that would push the enveloppe further. To celebrate 50 years of focus and continuous development, Rolex came up with the culmination of their 4,000 ft pro diver in an updated size. The red line as a nod to vintage enthusiasts is the cherry on the cake. Rolex are proving they can be modern and still relevant today whilst paying respect to their heritage, know-how and tradition. The competition is tough but I can't think of a more appealing diving watch right now in the market.

[@commentjedi]

Seems like they were consolidating the Sea Dweller and the Deep Sea Into one model. Enjoyable video, man!

[@edjack1993]

16600 for me. Have had it 12 years. Watch for life. 🙂

[@edducati]

Just bought the 126600 love it! Wear it daily.

[@jamesarthur6962]

The Sea Dweller & Deep Sea is probably my favourite piece in the Rolex range. It is the part of the Professional series, and I also prefer to collect them as vintage pieces as well. My most worn Rolex in the current line up other than the Deep Sea James Cameron would be the 126600 (I prefer the 43mm over the previous 40mm & love the single red line). Very good analogy on this subject & completely agree with you about the cyclops as I don’t like it either.

[@philippreutter4885]

One suggestion: maby you could put the referecnummber and the years of production on the picture when you are talking about a specific model. I know it‘s additional work and you say the number most of the time, but that would make it much easier to research the watches and one could geht eaven more informations from your videos. As allways great content. 💪

[@therapiststeve3294]

SO enjoyed this video, thank you for making it. I've often thought the the Sea Dweller was one of the most compelling Rolex watches yet the one that had the least amount of information "out there" about it. I love the 43mm size offering, especially given how my Submariner looks small on my large wrist. Great video!

[@ID-Guy]

I could make a documentary on the Sea-Dweller line... I think its so underrated. Really have a soft spot for the 16600 and the 116600 (I'd choose either in a heartbeat if I could afford them) But this new move with the 126600 was a smart one. It helped differentiate the line from the Submariner and made the SD look all the more imposing. I also got to try one on and it is something special... they absolutely nailed the proportions everywhere! If you have a larger than average wrist, do yourself a favour and pick one up. I promise that you won't regret it Steve ;)

[@kingflum]

Love this family of watches. Just sublime. Rolex designed it to go deeper... And in order to understand it, one too, needs to go deeper. 😉

[@ID-Guy]

Your 16600 is just class. Don't ever, ever sell it! And I think we both agreed on the night that this should be in your collection, brother ;)

[@kingflum]

Freddie Turner a philosophical horologist... Quite a mix.

[@blueshirtbuddah1665]

Another great video IDGuy. Well done sir.

[@ID-Guy]

It's always a pleasure Blueshirt. I can't wait to go into detail on other subjects this year, like dress watches and chronographs - also some more watch psychology ;)

[@Thomas_Burnett]

I feel that the SD4000 is the perfect Seadweller. With a 40mm non-super case and no cyclops it is like the perfect industrialised submariner. Considering how Rolex’s younger child Tudor has been churning out 41mm (Black Bay), 42mm (Pelagos) and 43mm (Black Bay Bronze) watches it is not surprising that the parent company should lead the way, with inspiration taken from the James Cameron and produce an up to date 43mm watch to fit this trend for larger watches. I think that you are correct about the inclusion of the cyclops. The watch is aimed at the civilian market in general and therefore ease of readability at a glance is important for those of us who rely on a date complication. The red line of text was partly to mark the anniversary and partly to please the crowd I believe. Hopefully the Explorer II won’t receive a Ceramic bezel. It’s not in its DNA. If you want a GMT complication with a Ceramic bezel, there is always the GMT Master II range. Another great video here my friend. A great look at what has proven to be yet another popular model from the (Charitable) Coronet Corporation. ✊

[@kingflum]

Thomas Burnett except the date window on the SD4k is slightly misaligned... About 1mm too far left. Because they force fitted the case and movement - hence the discontinuation so soon. It may be collectible but it's flawed imho.

[@Thomas_Burnett]

Faheem K Thanks for pointing this out to me my friend. I was not aware of this misalignment. You are probably correct in pointing out why this was a reason for need of upgrading. This ‘flaw’ does add a certain charm to my favourite choice of Seadweller that Rolex have made.

[@kingflum]

Thomas Burnett fair enough! A lot of the charm on vintage pieces stems from flaws in the piece - like spider dials or pumpkin patina - all flawed execution but now highly coveted. Makes sense I suppose! Cheers man!

[@Thomas_Burnett]

Faheem K I don’t think I own a watch that isn’t flawed by now. Lol.

[@ID-Guy]

I'd pick up a 16600 or 116600 in a heartbeat (over the 126600) just because the 40mm sizes fit me so perfectly (and don't look "oversized" on my wrist) It is a pity that they decided to introduce another cyclops... but hey, since the SD43 is the top-of-the-line diver, it makes sense I guess. And judging by this shift we might see ceramic on the Exp2's... but I hope they don't introduce it either...It really goes against what made them so badass to begin with. Thank you as always for the comment brother and happy new year!

[@damachine3]

I own it. There are two versions of this watch, which are nearly identical. The only difference is that there are two dials. The Mk1 dial, which has no crown between the words "Swiss Made", was made during the 50th production year only...making it the true 50th Anniversary version of this watch. That's the one I own. The Mk2 dial came out during the 51st production year (and continues to be produced today). The Mk2 dial has the crown between those two words. So, while the red "Sea-Dweller" (which is a nod to the 50 years) continues to be produced today in the stainless steel version, it is no longer a true 50th Anniversary watch. Even if it maintained the same dial, the date on the card would show that it's not a true 50th anniversary watch...but Rolex found a way for us to be able to tell by simply looking at the watch itself.

[@Nexus.Achiles]

And the MK1 is already selling at a premium in the secondary market. Not much for now but I expect the gap to deepen in the near future.

[@damachine3]

@@Nexus.Achiles Yep, as more and more collectors become aware. Most Rolex employees aren't even aware of the existence of the Mk1 and Mk2 dials.

[@maradona8623]

Same watch ! Nothing different, either is good !!!

[@damachine3]

@@maradona8623 What do you mean nothing is different? I just told you what is different. And of course either one is good. That wasn't the point. Plus, to true collectors, this stuff is interesting.

[@maradona8623]

@@damachine3

[@atothek302]

LOVE the 126600! Especially in 2 tone.

[@ID-Guy]

I still haven't warmed up to the whole Two-Tone idea on a "Professional" sports watch, but hey! It's quirky and cool! Thanks as always for the comment Shazbot!

[@atothek302]

IDGuy I know, it’s so strange to have a two tone SD. I don’t even like two tone, but I saw one and it look so good. I wasn’t expecting to like it.

[@thunderlightning9355]

Why own 1 ?... because we can ....lol

[@hugohernandez3651]

Amazing video for an amazing watch. Is not the Deepsea James Cameron edition at the top of the Rolex diver watches food chain? 🤔

[@raksh9]

The 16600 is my favourite watch. Can be worn just about anywhere. A 4000 would be gorgeous, though. Wish I'd got one when it was around.

[@Leftystrat]

Too many design faults mate , too top heavy. 16600+ 126600 keep these

[@Mark..P]

Great review and video.

[@ID-Guy]

Thank you as always Mark! It's going to be an awesome year. I can't wait to look into more "philosophical" watch subjects too ;)

[@Mark..P]

IDGuy Looking forward to it. Hope all is well 👍

[@rodriguezahr]

Nice review. Much Enjoyed. Everything works with this SD43. The proportions, the balance, the presence that is extraordinary on the wrist. The cyclops is part of Rolex DNA and the fact it was not on former deepsea and sea dweller models is simply because it was not technically doable. Rolex found the way and here it is. No one needs a date at 1200m bellow sea level anyways, If it’s there the. It needs a cyclops.

[@JR-nl3mh]

Love it, bough it. 6 months waiting for that call from the AD.

[@jda7499]

Lovely Video !! I think this should be your next watch after ur stunning Omega SeaMaster 300

[@JR-nl3mh]

Love mine SD43.

[@danielpowers2413]

My favorite Rolex. Brilliant design and execution. Wears like a 42mm. I don’t mind the cyclops at all.

[@petespurgeon7217]

Coup de' grace of submariner engineering perfection for the very best

[@ID-Guy]

Very well said Pete. It manages to be an exponential Submariner at the end of the day ;)

[@ernestogarcia7931]

You sound so serious like a James Bond movie lol enjoy your expertise and knowledge You are very informative appreciate everything thanks Ernie

[@danielvandermerwe7921]

I heard from AD that it’s harder to come by then new GMTs

[@niniengineering]

...really a nice peace! But I would prefer a stele&gold without the date! Because I love the symmetry of my 114060 🤙

[@ncam6300]

Great review! I just picked up my SD today and was impressed with the modern size 43. I thought it would look large, but then again it’s a tool watch that should look hefty yet sophisticated. The weight is not too heavy in comparison to my cheap TAG aquaracer caliber16. I’m happy with it.

[@BlackBirdieGolf]

I love this watch. I'm going to get it this spring.

[@Swedeslung]

As a professional diver and SD43 owner, the larger bezel and knurling, cyclops, and overall balance attribute to its effectiveness underwater. If you dive for a living you’d understand this. On the pragmatic side however a dive watch isn’t very necessary as a deep sea surface supplied diver, but it’s a lifetime piece that should you bring it with you on your sat or deep dives, it’s available and durable

[@Yorkshiremadmick]

Love my 16600 Swiss dial. 👍🏻 good review.

[@ullikoelsch6494]

43 without crown on 6 ! The best !! 👍🏻

[@_Sam62]

The reason for the cyclops is that without a cyclops you would see the date window too close to the center. This is because the dial is too large for the timepiece. Rolex has therefore opted for a cyclops on the Sea-Dweller for aesthetic reasons.

[@neilpiper9889]

I have the 43mm Sea-gull Ocean Star with the wonderful cyclops lens. Ideal for 74 year old guys like me with poor close vision and who have little money but like bigger more legible watches. If I had the money I would buy the bigRolex sea dweller with cyclops over the common or garden submariner.

[@ID-Guy]

I hope you picked up the blue variant Neil ;) It's amazing just how legible these modern divers have become with their new dial layouts. Divers are perfect for ageing eyes (my old man can attest to that) Thank you for the comment Neil

[@ultimaetsolder]

Can't get past that name Sea-Gull. Like a Pigeon.

[@neilpiper9889]

@@ID-Guy I don't like blue, so no, I bought the black. They do the Ocean Star with improved lume and a ceramic bezel now. Might get one sometime soon.

[@neilpiper9889]

@@ultimaetsolder can't get past the name Rolex, sounds like Boxxocks, and the Sea-gull name on the dial keeps away muggers. Win win

[@jamesarthur6962]

IDGuy it would be interesting for you to do a VLOG on all the two tone Rolex pieces especially now they have made a Sea Dweller in two tone as I think this is going to be the next big thing in 2020 & Rolex may even release a two tone Submariner at Basel 2020 for the first time.

[@Nexus.Achiles]

The TT Sub 116613LN and LB have been out for a while.

[@thunderlightning9355]

Love my Basic Sea Dweller Stainless .. add it to my Sub collection ..with the Cyclops 43 mm.. big & heavy ,,,like a 53 Chevy

[@JB-fk7ed]

I think the move to 43mm was more about product development than anything else. Just like we saw with the changes to the steel GMT masters to differentiate them from the submariner line - only bi-color bezels, jubilee bracelets, only using rose gold for PM. They did this so that the GMT master and Subs were fundamentally different on many levels. Now the SeaDweller line is no longer just a more capable Sub. The SeaDweller line is now all larger than the standard Sub. They’re trying to make them look and feel different. That said the 116600 in my eyes is the best diver Rolex has ever made with the broadest appeal to both 5 and 6 digit fans.

[@JohnH-mo5mb]

The SD 43, Mk 1 without that little crown at the bottom, is the pinnacle of a diver in design IMHO. For a long time, I thought that it was an unnecessary size increase for the purpose of bragging rights, I am converted after trying it on. It is just awesome. And the cyclops, which due to its size looks a little bit like a wart on the submariner, is awesome here. Prefer it even over the beloved SD4k. Absolutely perfect design. Yet, I am not going near the flawed 3235 movement. Until Rolex fixes that problem, the watch will remain a dream.

[@samuelegiraffi3316]

Simply amazing

[@underachievingwatchcollect1878]

The sd43 is a great watch especially if you have a larger wrist like me. But I think the one to get is the 116600 -modern in every way and great symmetry with a fully graduated bezel and no cyclops. Great video as always.

[@ID-Guy]

I'd kill for a 16600 or a 116600 (they really are such characters and so stealthy) but for a larger wrist, the SD43 looks perfect. After trying one on it just "visually" looked like it was right at my limit. 40mm's has always been my sweet spot. Thanks as always for the comment Krist!

[@jeremydahm2124]

History aside, the new Sea-dweller looks like a burly beast of a tool watch. The use of the Explorer black instead of the ink black keeps it real here. To my eyes, the subs look like jewelry in comparison. Not in a bad way. Same goes for the GMT's but it's more appropriate on them, again, to my eyes that is. Great vid. I want one.

[@andrewbrown5636]

I’ve had most Rolex references including 2 DSSD James Cameron’s, SkyDweller, Ex2 and the usual subs / GMTs. I’ve flipped them all apart from the SD43 and a sub which my girlfriend owns. the SD43 is the perfect watch for wrists above 7”. Further more they are fairly easy to obtain as not much hype on this ref. Most pre-owned examples can be had for between £500-£1k over retail so not really worth waiting a long time for

[@sh-cc6vj]

For modern times and collectors we wear bigger watches and love the cyclops so the newest version mark 2 Dracula with the upgraded movement is just amazing and so much more practical for us professionals and civilians , I can tell this youtuber is a civilian so I assure you this cyclops and bigger watch with the great lume is a great asset for professionals and the collector

[@Jack-is9sm]

I have a gorgeous 'feet first' Red label Vintage Submariner. My favourite watch in my collection.

[@collaberatorzseanhuang8952]

The 116600 40mm is the best modern Rolex.

[@impexRQ]

The Rolex sea dweller 116600 was the best Rolex sport model ever made and the last sea dweller 40mm non-cyclops

[@Norman-mn7gp]

Your KZbin channel is the best ... I don't like helium valves.

[@EscapePlan97]

Norman 21 at least the Rolex valve doesn’t stick out like omega.

[@leecone4051]

Great video.. What I find interesting .. A lot of talking about the specifications of the seed Weller versus the submariner. But every picture shows a wrist in a man in a business suit. Not one picture of the sea dweller or submariner getting wet on the diver suit? Doing its job ! Alitttle interesting !

[@michaelturner7949]

You could have mentioned that the Cyclops is now molded into the crystal. Rolex have all along wanted all their watches to carry a Cyclops. The technology now enables its inclusion.

[@Nexus.Achiles]

Not molded, just glued and actually removable.

[@Romio666]

Guys I never owned a Sub, yet I have a JC and SD43. A friend is proposing to swap my tritium SD from 1995 full set, with his 5513 from 1989. Is it a good idea ? Should I pay him any differential cash ?!

[@mudachuka12345]

There is a new seadweller or is this the current one that’s been out for years?

[@TomasLonga]

2017

[@ID-Guy]

I think there are two generations of this New Sea Dweller line, but I just meant "New" in the context of it being the "latest" - you can only fit so many words in a video title ;)

[@damachine3]

@@ID-Guy I own it. Not sure what you mean by two generations but the only difference is that there are two dials. The Mk1 dial, which has no crown between the words "Swiss Made", was made during the 50th production year only...making it the true 50th Anniversary version of this watch. That's the one I own. The Mk2 dial came out during the 51st production year (and continues to be produced today). The Mk2 dial has the crown between those two words. So, while the red "Sea-Dweller" (which is a nod to the 50 years) continues to be produced today in the stainless steel version, it is no longer a true 50th Anniversary watch. Even if it maintained the same dial, the date on the card would show that it's not a true 50th anniversary watch...but Rolex found a way for us to be able to tell by simply looking at the watch itself.

[@meson183]

I would buy into the Sea Dweller if they did a Sea Dweller 43 red line with a no-date option.

[@AJ-bi6ns]

meson1 SD has always featured a date. Don’t see Rolex changing any time soon. I bet before 2022 they will drop the red text as well

[@brandonnickerson8934]

There is one major design flaw. The matte dial. Such a missed oppoortunity by Rolex. I prefer the cleaner bezel of the Sub vs SD. Nothing beats the abyss black of the Sub.

[@hansmartin3028]

What do you think about the matte Dial ? A lot of People don t like the matte black, because they say it tooly and no elegance...?

[@ID-Guy]

Hans, I reminded myself again and again to mention the matte dial. Kicked myself that I never mentioned it in the discussion (but added a one-liner during the video) So! Again, it shows a nice alternative approach the the usual gloss dials of Sub's & GMT's. I think for a more rugged, tool'y watch, a matte dial is superb (it's more practical too because it won't cause glare in the light) - Personally, I much prefer the infinity effect of the Gloss dial on these models (it's much more visually interesting) But the Sea-Dweller seems to really pull ideas from the original 1665 with this reference, it makes the watch pretty unique ;) Great question and thanks for the comment brother!

[@robertlulek1634]

I just bought a Rolex Sea-Dweller 43 mm yellow gold and stainless steel it is an absolutely beautiful watch first relics I really loved because I'm a big guy with big wrists and it finally fits me well

[@tomkhong9828]

Cyclop is very Rolex. If people loath about it, buy an Omega

[@wildbillharding]

Or have it removed!

[@TIMSTURBO]

Nope the SD of choice 116600 perfection

[@LesterLovesWatches]

The SD43 to me is like Rolex saying: “sorry I completely burnt your dinner, but here’s a creme egg cos I know you like them”. 16600 for me all the way.

[@ID-Guy]

Hahahaha! I'm with you on the 16600 and the 116600 (the 40mm sizes are perfection on my wrist) The only reason why I'd never be interested in owning the 43mm is because it doesn't "visually" look great on my wrist. The lugs are sitting right at my limit. There is just something so magical about 40mm divers... Thank you for the comment as always Lester!

[@LesterLovesWatches]

Clive Bixby I meant that they ruined it with the maxi case and fat legs but then added the red line as a sop.

[@billyshelleynorth]

It's a Super Sub or as Jay-Z refers to as a Big Face Rollie

[@jimdavis762]

It is no longer a dive watch,nobody dives with it,hence the date window and the date,something it should never of had for diving

[@Nexus.Achiles]

Professional saturation divers actually need to know the date when they write in the log book.

[@jimdavis762]

Nexus Achilles fair enough. Thanks

[@alienhatz3265]

my thinking is they always wanted the cyclops and now they can achieve it

[@johnayres2303]

I don’t understand the use of gold in a professional watch unless it is just the rotor. I have a steel submariner and I am waiting for an Explorer. The term luxury dive watch makes no sense to me.

[@gmshadowtraders]

This is the elephant in the room. He's being extremely deceptive in avoiding it.

[@ID-Guy]

I should have addressed the two-tone variant more. Actually, I discussed it in the first "Sea-Dweller" video I made 6 months ago. Two tone really doesn't make sense for a watch like this especially since we consider it the "Professional" model of the family... but hey, Rolex has a funny side ;)

[@johnayres2303]

IDGuy No problem, I really enjoy your channel, you are one of a few people who turned me on to the Explorer for which I am now on the waiting list.

[@gmshadowtraders]

@@ID-Guy Appreciate you can't check off all the boxes in one video, that's true. Haha the funny angle. One could argue, whereas only their Milgauss used to be the 'joke' line, today the concept has expanded to most examples of Rolex watches :) Older was better, for sure.

[@julieta203]

Rolex is releasing more new watches than an Omega Anniversary year and thats every year

[@scherzandokarasu6353]

'hell under the Goddamn hood. Hurrah!

[@stevenuk]

this for me is illustration that Rolex has no new creative ideas. The 40mm no-cyclops looks much better.

[@darrenporter1850]

I want to buy (my first) Rolex. Anyone get me 'on the list', so I can order a new one? Long shot but I will ask anyway.

[@Dave062YT]

Like the 43mm size .hate the cyclops ,would rather see a no date .

[@vaughanatkinson8421]

Ok up to 43mm I can understand it is supposed to be a work piece....but ffs how many divers need a cyclops to read the date??? It is just wrong in so many ways, not required, not needed and definitely not requested!! Perhaps they were, as always unfortunately with Rolex just doing their own thing and not listening to the consumer...again!! Anyway wheres the response to my 6 month old email Mr Busy Man ; )

[@ID-Guy]

It's all about appealing to the regular punters and not the enthusiasts. since the SD43 is the "flagship" diver of the family, that had to make it more accessible for the every day person. It is a pity that they went against the original DNA....but there's nothing a heat gun can't unfix ;) I'm going to have to scour my emails to find it. I've been so bad with correspondences Vaughan...

[@AJ-bi6ns]

The cyclops appeals to more customers than the few historian collectors who follow the line. Cyclops is symbolic of Rolex’s innovation. It is part of what makes a Rolex unique and easily identifiable. Why wouldn’t Rolex include this technology in one of their pinnacle tool watches? History clearly states SD were always intended to have one but couldn’t be pulled off due to limitations of the cyclops remaining attached at depth... Ultimately, it’s hard to argue that Rolex didn’t listen to the consumer as the watches is on waitlists at ADs and carry’s a premium on secondary markets. Even more unfortunate but true is watch enthusiasts represent a smaller percentage of watch buyers that we like to think.

[@vaughanatkinson8421]

@@AJ-bi6ns my point was what is the point of a date on a dive watch, and especially with the cyclops (which as you can tell I detest). I know the response will be its worn more often out of the water, and other brands have it etc etc but to me its a waste of dial space ! Just my personal view ; )

[@Nexus.Achiles]

Saturation divers spending several days in the bell actually need to know the date when writing in the log book.

[@vaughanatkinson8421]

@@Nexus.Achiles they can get that over the intercom!

[@russellharris5072]

Unless you as a pro diver are spending more than 24 hours at extreme depth in a diving bell,you do NOT need date information on your watch.Besides,pro divers these days use dive computers rendering the watches you are discussing obsolete.So why the extreme depth rating on these watches?

[@AJ-bi6ns]

Russell Harris No diver regardless of experience spends 24 hours in a diving bell, simply isn’t how saturation diving works. Sat divers have an entire topside team monitoring their whole dive rendering computers unnecessary as well. Dive computers are almost exclusively used in rec diving... Outside of the small percentage of wearers who will ever utilize the depth rating the technology and heritage of the watch is what draws customers. Call it bragging rights if you’d like but it’s pretty neat to have a tool capable of exceeding 1200M with ease.

[@russellharris5072]

that was my point,hence no need for a date complication...................

[@AJ-bi6ns]

Russell Harris As it is a watch that for all intensive purposes is bought due to pedigree but we all know it is worn for display

[@russellharris5072]

Again,my other point and the depth rating only serves to hike the price...............

[@m.e.p.r]

It's 43mm otherwise it's identical to a sub lol. That's all, that's it, done.

[@AJ-bi6ns]

M E P R Incorrect, superior movement, helium escape valve, flip lock link along with aesthetic changes such as the individual minute markers on the bezel. Is it similar? Sure, but it’s easy to spot the difference vs a plain Jane Sub

[@Nexus.Achiles]

The Sub 116610 has a different case shape, the supercase with fat lugs, makes it looks boxy. The SD 126600 on the other hand has tapered lugs giving it a more slender appearance. That single difference in itself to me is huge.

[@jeeperspeepers8323]

Nothing Rolex does is important any longer.

[@ID-Guy]

Hahaha! I just meant "important" in the context of where their designs might go in the future. But I will agree that these sports models are starting to bore me quite a lot at the moment. It's going to be so refreshing to focus more on Dress watches and Chrono's this year ;)

[@zioo3117]

43 mm is unnecessary. The cyclops lens ruins the general look of the watch. The single line of red text is just fine. The problem with the line is clear.

[@peetsnort]

What is the point of the wanker watch for the office jock who is never going to dive deep. It purely for the peacocks who also have a porche and think it makes them look like a f1 driver Meanwhile the driver or diver who actually needs the car or watch can't afford it. Duhhh

[@1517the_year]

Howard Petterson ok boomer

[@m.e.p.r]

Lol, no evolution what's so ever, it's the worst and most boring Rolex money can by. Next...

[@yearofthemetalboar5645]

It is not important. At all...

[@ID-Guy]

I meant "important" in the context of where Rolex's modern designs might go in the future ;) It's definitely not important in the grander scheme of our lives hahaha!

[@stevefox8605]

Another bland fugly Rolex...wouldnt want one at any price, design has been done to death & only exists as an overly marketed status symbol. Cheers 👍🏻

[@stevefox8605]

@@davidofglenbrook4487 no, the design has just been homaged & copied to death, it's bland and uninspired, & just ubiquitous. I prefer the Explorer, at least you don't see those everywhere. Thanks for the comment 😁

[@mikecarnes9182]

Mmmm... Baby wrist.