(IEA) Indian Evidence Act One Shot | Judiciary PYQ's | State Judiciary Prelims Preparation

[@PWLawWallah]

📲To Enroll This Batch For Free - smart.link/v56du12dbktoq Niti Batch 2.0 is for all the aspirants Judicial Aspirants of any State, all the notes will be uploaded on PW App in their respective batch in PDF Format along with a practice sheet including Hints & Solutions 📲PW App Link - smart.link/m4rvjjxijr6wd 🌐PW Website - www.pw.live

[@rajeevverma8973]

mam , pdf available nhi he app pr.....please provide pdf of this 5 hrs session.

[@xyz-tc1uy]

Mam q.17 answer will be c as for examining any Judge as to his conduct order of superior court is required but any thing occured in his presence he may be asked questions as to such thing.

[@rishabh932]

Q7- Postmortem report is nit a public document under sec 74.

[@siddhartharao414]

Q 302 - ans should be (b) as per Indian law, expectation of death is required in English law and not in Indian law

[@TheGreatIndianPhilosophies]

In question 186 answer should be D not B, as the confession of accused is not only impacting him but other co accused as well, so section 30 is exception to confession rule

[@sarthakgupta2790]

Rightly said

[@harshsaxena4271]

But it will be considered as weak evidence against co accused and the conviction of that accused is made after corroboration

[@meenakshigarg2902]

Hats off to you .. Regular live class 5.30 hours.. I could not complete it I watched it for 2 hours. Thank you so much.. Will complete it tomorrow. ❤❤❤

[@azizhasan9756]

Hats off ma'am, Session was very helpful but Ans to 363 should be B only Deoman upadhyay held sec 27 constitutionally valid on the ground of art 14 . Kathikalu oghad held sec 27 constitutionally valid on the ground of art 20(3).

[@pratikpandey7721]

Question 88 the correct option should be option B, that is Criminal cases only, as the General Provision under Civil Case is that the Character should be irrelevant. Character under Civil Cases are relevant only under exception.

[@manishagoyal5312]

Q32. It should be 'never shifts' according to sec 101

[@prashantdixit4667]

Q 302 - expectation of death is not necessary in India under sec 32. Answer would be option (B)

[@harshsaxena4271]

Question No 32 Burden of proof under section 101 never shifts only the onus of proof may shift..

[@nazninzaveri]

@@harshsaxena4271 Section 101 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, lays down the principle that the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact or proposition. In other words, the person who makes an allegation or claim is responsible for proving it. **Section 101 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872:** > "Whoever desires any court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts which he asserts, must prove that those facts exist. When a person is bound to prove the existence of any fact, it is said that the burden of proof lies on that person." ### **Shifting of Burden of Proof:** While Section 101 sets the initial burden of proof, this burden can shift during the course of legal proceedings. The concept of shifting the burden of proof is essential in legal practice and depends on various factors, including the progress of the case, the evidence presented, and specific legal provisions. 1. **Initial Burden:** - The party who brings the claim (plaintiff) or makes an assertion carries the initial burden of proof. They must establish a prima facie case by providing sufficient evidence to support their claim. 2. **Shifting of Burden:** - Once the party with the initial burden has provided sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case, the burden may shift to the opposing party (defendant) to disprove or rebut the evidence. - For instance, if a plaintiff proves that a contract exists and that the defendant breached it, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove that there was no breach or that the contract is void or unenforceable for some reason. 3. **Counter-Claims and Defenses:** - In cases where the defendant raises a counter-claim or a specific defense, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant to establish the facts supporting the counter-claim or defense. 4. **Statutory Provisions:** - Some statutes may explicitly shift the burden of proof in certain situations. For example, in cases of corruption, once a public servant is found to be in possession of disproportionate assets, the burden shifts to the public servant to explain the source of such assets. 5. **Conclusion of the Case:** - The ultimate burden of proof remains on the party who initially brought the case. If, after all the evidence has been presented, the court is not satisfied that the initial burden has been discharged, the case will fail. In summary, Section 101 establishes that the burden of proof lies with the person asserting the fact, but this burden may shift during the course of the trial based on the evidence presented and the claims made by the opposing party.Therefore answer C is correct ✅

[@Japaritai-k1n]

Mam ,I think the answer of question no 10 is relevant because it is falling under section 15 i.e whether the fact accidental or intentional.

[@honeywadhw1802]

She really needs to study indian evidence act from a good teacher.

[@gauravkumarsingh741]

Agreed.

[@harshsaxena4271]

Question 88 Character of a person is relevant only in Criminal case -- good character

[@pratikpandey7721]

Answer to question No.184 should be option C as Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel is not applicable to ultra vires decisions, and here in this particular question the Police officer acting outside the scope of his authority is ultra vires.

[@Islamic_post-b4n]

Q 153- option B is right aswer... Not C... Refer illustrations of sec 92 ...

[@palvisharma5745]

No it's C only

[@riturani1857]

answer 32 should be 'B'

[@preetireshamia4036]

Seriously mam you are doing a tremendous job .......thank a lot mam

[@RS13363]

It was a good session.Thank you Ma'am.

[@DLCB1F832]

Best PYQ session I have ever seen, thank you so much ma'am

[@mahimansari3526]

Q - 302....plss recheck...with due respect...ans should be ..B...in india person needs not be under expectancy of death.

[@harshsaxena4271]

Question 87 Video conferencing was allowed by the case Prafull B Desai vs State of Maharashtra

[@seemajoshi6371]

186 ka sec 30 correct answer h. I have checked in official answer key released on mphc website

[@rushibak6119]

I also think so

[@coochbeharlawcoachingcente5167]

Question no. 10. The answer is A. Not B. See section 14 illustration C.

[@rushibak6119]

Am confused in ques 60 after reading sec 79 which deals with genuine of certified copies ..then why we hv to give proof for it if its genuineness is already presumed by the court itself .. Plzz anyone ansr

[@KartikeyabajpaiLex]

01:15:40 Q 56 is not Same as Q. 42 Here the Answer would be Option 'D' In 42, Statement 'A', it said "113A WOULD NOT BE attracted when marriage more than 7 years" which was CORRECT statement In 56, Statement 'A', it said "113A WOULD BE attracted when marriage more than 7 years" which is an INCORRECT statement"

[@rushibak6119]

Quess 113 ..ansr should b C (to stop a person) Sec 115 nowhere talks about proving anything ..it simply stops person from denying wht he asserted ..

[@vijaymeena8551]

Ma'am section 18 deals with principal of agency ??

[@KartikeyabajpaiLex]

04:57:30 Q437 Answer 'D' is Correct Apne Unintentionally ulta bta diya hai. Presumption of Alive is u/s 107, if it is shown that he was alive within the last 30 years Burden to prove that person's death SHOWS that there is 'PRESUMPTION OF LIFE' of that person in question. Presumption of Death is u/s 108, if it is shown that he has not been heard within the last 7 years. Burden to prove that person's life SHOWS that there is 'PRESUMPTION OF DEATH' of that person in question.

[@ananyasingh1143]

Thankyou muje bhi confuse krdia is ques k answer se mam ne

[@RupinderKaur-vr5pp]

Hlo mam...there is question regarding sec 76 iea that is university exams are public documents or not ??

[@mankeshlamba1_13_7]

thank you so much mam🙏

[@homosapien2464]

With due respect, Would have been much easier and less frustrating if it was serially section wise. Secondly, most of the questions were similar. Ideally, barring a few repetitions here and there, they should have been unique and not repeated.

[@aryankumawat8023]

Great session 🎉

[@manishachaudhary2324]

Thank you ma'am

[@deepshikhak.616]

Maam how can i get pdf of evidence one shot video

[@wave6957]

Hindi Medium Judiciary Batch Start kariye Please, Hindi medium ke liye koi achi coaching nahi hai expect Rahul's ias and Rahul's ias ki fees 1.4 Lakh hai . PW should help students

[@legalfirm16]

but mam 387 question no me 59 section may be proved by oral evidence hoga na

[@TravelingWithLaw]

News paper is not primary evidence ma'am

[@KartikeyabajpaiLex]

02:50:27 Q 186 Option D would be correct, not Option B. Sec 30 provides the scenario where confession of a person is not just relevant against him but also against the co accused

[@AN-qv5eg]

Good work but some answers are wrong

[@gauravkumarsingh741]

2hr 7 mins. Seriously. That is what you say is meant by Latent and Patent defect. With all due respect Ma'am, galat padhane se behtar hai na padhana.

[@Mahakal452]

Mam aap hindi me kyu nhi material late ho I know mostly bache english ke hote hai per mam hindi bale bacho ka kiya , vo kha se pade . Plz short out my problem 🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@hemrajdogra6114]

It can be acted upon

[@somyagupta6274]

Mam Jo aap capsule ka bta rhi h bo kaha available h

[@TravelingWithLaw]

Q 56 Recheck

[@abhinavrawal145a3]

Mam plz cpc ke question bhi kra do

[@vanshikhasharma8489]

Iss mcq ki pdf kahan milegi?

[@JAVVED1]

Thanks Madam

[@shekhimran7567]

Nice one

[@satishjaiswal9209]

Pls provide pdf also mam

[@kiranrajput5202]

Thnx mam jiii

[@riturani1857]

answer 19 should be option 'C'

[@tarunmishravats7603]

NO

[@shivangiroy466]

81 it's section 140.

[@rishi.999]

Only of 2 3 states PYQ is there only😢

[@kumarpratyush5885]

Question number 5 ka Option C correct hona chahiye.. kyuki Hostile Witness wo hota hai jo us party ke against statement deta hai jo us witness ko bulata h... Ye jaroori nhi h ki Hostile Witness jhuth bol rha hai.. agaar wo hostile hua to sach v to bol sakta h

[@nazninzaveri]

Your voice sounds like alia bhat

[@advocatevenkatknowyourrigh4107]

good

[@seemajoshi6371]

184 ka C hoga answer

[@AdvocatekomalKayat]

Mm hindi medium walo k liye b bej do

[@poonampoonam2132]

Ma'm Hindi m questions le aao plz

[@RohitSharma-fc9kw]

Mam ques. Hindi m bi krva diya kro

[@vinitasingh9043]

pathetic bht obvious question k answer galt btaye h even after reconsideration....question km karao but dnt teach wrong be accountable for wat u teach

[@famousjudiciary835]

Hindi me Q laao please

[@AdvocatekomalKayat]

Hindi mai question upload krwa do mm

[@Duaafreen9485]

Maim Question hindi m bhi laiye

[@kalpeshbhamre7144]

Gujarat

[@abhijeetsingh3047]

There are so many wrong answers. Really poor. You need to work very hard

[@AdvocatekomalKayat]

Hindi mai b bj do

[@honeywadhw1802]

I wonder how someone can have such an audacity to teach wrong that too on youtube.

[@Aghori_Muslim]

Atleast she is teaching something

[@viveksahu5730]

if you've found anything wrong,bring a student its also your duty to make it correct. if you can't do this you have no liberty to say this type of statement.

[@DarkFacts0]

Then why are here wasting ur precious time. Go and buy any course for 50k 100k nd learn accurately from there… immature person

[@Hamarimayi]

I wonder how a person finding so much faults on others without any mistake can ever be a Judge. Your traits match with a lawyer. Better not insult a Guru here and try to act oversmart.

[@johnlocke3077]

Q32 will be B.

[@goyalpriya615]

Best PYQ session I have ever seen, thank you so much ma'am

[@deepshikhak.616]

Maam how can i get pdf of evidence one shot video