Everything You Need to Know About 5G

[@unpronouncable2442]

"Just imagine dowloading an HD movie in under a second" "Just imagine hitting your download cap in under a second" "Just imagine racking up additional fees for downloads in under a second"

[@Aleks6010]

oops just hit my 1gb data limit in 1.6 seconds

[@unpronouncable2442]

[Writing] will create forgetfulness in the learners’ souls, because they will not use their memories; they will trust to the external written characters and not remember of themselves. The specific which you have discovered is an aid not to memory, but to reminiscence, and you give your disciples not truth, but only the semblance of truth; they will be hearers of many things and will have learned nothing; they will appear to be omniscient and will generally know nothing; they will be tiresome company, having the show of wisdom without the reality.

[@rahul33986]

Nbbn bssafccc Bcvb BBB b B.B. B.B. has. C. Bang

[@rahul33986]

Al Eks vhngnh

[@LilacMonarch]

Hopefully by the time carriers add support for 5g, they'll also increase their data limits

[@justsnappy]

6G: Teleportation

[@bob-km4uq]

justsnappy it will probably create new diseases to

[@prospertech1860]

Loss of organs maybe. We shouldnt be messing with that until we're more advanced. But we still have Trump so we arent even close yet.

[@MrTantalust]

7G will let us look into youtube poster's living rooms.

[@arslongavitabreves]

8G is time travel

[@MrTantalust]

@@arslongavitabreves 9g will allow cops to implant alcohol-sensors in the skin of habitual DWI offenders, with built-in tazer electrodes connected directly to his hippopotamus. 10g will enable rectum-implanted wireless anti-farting gas-sensors for space-suits, dentist's chairs and elevators. 11g will see the introduction of implanted forehead cameras to ___________?

[@jamesworth6507]

What exactly was wrong with 4G??? How fast do we need the internet to be???

[@ignaciot]

5G is not intended for browsing through the internet or dowloading movies faster, but for autonomous driving and internet of things, that is, comunication between machines.

[@zalegend4928]

Ignacio T well said

[@seedplanter7173]

We need it drop dead fast.

[@GamingWithEssa]

By 2023 it is estimated that we will use 18x more data browsing the web so we do need faster speeds to keep up with our heavy internet usage

[@SeaJay_Oceans]

5G Crowd Control kzbin.info/www/bejne/m4W0paigd9ZonKc

[@bronie18]

4G: My time has come 1G: Does anybody know I existed?

[@shahnassar7024]

0G: Am i a joke to you?

[@roidroid]

i thought 4G towers already used beamforming.

[@jackgibs5855]

Khoi Le ...say that in English

[@roidroid]

Come on dad, you said if i lost the bet you'd only do this for 1 day, this has to stop.

[@simply_cake]

Feel Team Six umm is he your son?

[@garychadwick8640]

4G LTE -A uses mimo but is 800mhz low frequency long range but slow speed

[@HamguyBacon]

"Just imagine getting cancer" "Just imagine Damaging your DNA" "Just imagine being tracked 24/7" "just imagine corporate interests over privacy and health" "Just imagine using a technology with no studies done on the dangers"

[@NoNORADon911]

''You might call me a dreamer....but I'm not the only one....''

[@yashsawalkar646]

just imagine how dumb you are.

[@m0nkey13]

Test it out. Put your head in a microwave (a non-ionising radiation) and let us know how that works out.

[@MrAquinas1]

That's unknowable.

[@m0nkey13]

I was responding to the comment that non-ionising radiation cannot cause cancer or change DNA. Try to keep up. The sun gives us non-ionising radiation, are you saying skin cancer is a hoax?

[@maycyvandora6462]

“Experts can’t tell us what 5G is because they don’t really know” 🚶🏼ok I’m out of here

[@c4p4c1t1v3]

aight imma head out

[@99owL]

@jess jesse youre a dumbass

[@raoulfr1790]

ShabbyFrame why would you disrespect him, he never disrespected you?

[@markotasevski6763]

hahaha

[@lawdahmussy]

Maybe she meant all the rules have not been defined. Work in progress..🤷🏽‍♂️

[@jimshaw2151]

Wrong Title: Should have been "Everything The Powers That Be Want You to Know About 5G"

[@sjin8896]

Jim Shaw Perfect comment. It is going to have horrific consequences on all living creatures for no good reason.

[@AceixSmart]

@@sjin8896 really? explain yourself

[@whome3940]

@@AceixSmart Cancer in humans. Death in bees and other insects, which will destroy the food web. And all so moronic phone zombies can consume more data and unscrupulous corporations can make more money. Yay. We really are turning into the fat fucks in Wall-E.

[@willmellon6650]

@@whome3940 there's no evidence that it will do any of those things.

[@envynoir]

Who Me Brainwashing did you really well, that shit was there before your dumbass was even born so quit complaining, you moron.

[@marioxmariox]

Texting was available long before 2G, it was called a pager.

[@txm100]

Yeah and HOW THE FUCK did this work? Yeah, with mobile networks.

[@JustGOC]

Oscar Santana nah I used mail.

[@ZigZag9639]

If you want to use a pager like they did in the 90s, go right ahead. Enjoy! 👋

[@BxNcVsper777]

2g has been out. it finally reaches the public eye. like 5g. it not new but it's "new to us"

[@JodBronson]

LOL at OP. Funny but true!

[@asicshot]

This doesn't seem like everything we need to know. What tests are being done to determine the effect on biological organisms?

[@k1awesomeness]

what biological effects are there? how stupid are you?

[@karlgw]

people are working on it www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402696

[@MrConformation]

What proof is there that any-G is unsafe? Government and corporations said so... Everything is safe till proven otherwise. The same gov / Corp's that claim "Only a drug can prevent or cure". The same (system) Judge that gave a Round-Up victim $100-m settlement as the FDA claims Round-Up is safe.

[@recruit8921]

Boi the sun does more damage than 5g.

[@unacceptableonanon2655]

@@k1awesomeness Since when is it stupid to look for more information??

[@iodine-wine]

Imagine your microwave is operating with the door open - that’s 5G.

[@Piplodocus]

Bollocks my microwave is a stupid amount more powerful and works in the range of most 2G/3G stuff as it's closer to the resonant frequency of water, which is how it cooks.

[@iodine-wine]

Piplodocus sorry, I meant military grade directed-energy weapon.

[@dowjoe1208]

Microwaves don’t emit radiation like we think. It’s not harmful - Neil Degrasse Tyson

[@Hawaii1313]

@@dowjoe1208 , NEIL DEFRASSE IS AN IDIOT!

[@jamesthomas4693]

That is literally true. 5g waves are right around the lower side of microwaves.

[@TheMacer1111]

This is going to be one hell of an expensive implementation.

[@ComandanteJ]

Well, it'll use more antennas, and that will make ir more expensive due to licensing costs and whatnot, but apart from that, i dont see why it would be a whole lot prcier than current tech.

[@Surtistuff]

Spyrotechnics TBH Sprint has a good idea. They want to use really high carrier Aggregation for higher speeds, they even have the spectrum for it. And it makes sense, carrier Aggregation is cheaper, faster and getting faster. As more carriers implement 5G a lot of device will be moving off to 5G opening up spectrum for 4G, something Sprint can use. All they need is bakchaul.

[@blackcatooow]

Spyrotechnics better become cheaper. Or no one will buy it

[@blackcatooow]

Horulema Miku ッ exactly

[@msheart2]

No it won't be cheaper not even close, you believe lies and liars

[@I-Sagittarius-l]

absorbed by plants and rain, why you didn't mention humans since we do have water in our bodies like plants and obviously rain

[@auctoritate8254]

Sagittarius Well mostly because humans won't block the signal. It can still reach your device if you're holding it, but not if you're, say, in a forest or something.

[@Mseguin13]

And you think that while the signal reaches the device, it doesn't reach you at the same time? Your body keeps being smash with signals everywhere, everyday... It is so dangerous.

[@bob-km4uq]

People like to think we’re biologically superior to nature. News flash, we aren’t, and what harms plants and animals has the potential to harm humans

[@FrainBart_main]

Well we can absorb visible light and IR too, don't we? When it's sunny there is around 1000 W/m^2, which is a few million times higher than radiation from 4G, 5G, Wifi etc. They also have around a thousand times higher frequency (hundreds of THz).

[@mariosspyrou1054]

We asbrorb light to you know actually be visible

[@redshardz1950]

J'ai du écouter ça en cours d'anglais je vous déteste

[@Rlk_Rlk]

menfou + palu

[@Rymorin4]

5G, AI, IoT = Ultimate surveillance state/ technocracy

[@cessposter]

you have been using ai and iot since the early 2010s

[@IBennx77I]

"Scientists dont even know what it is" HA I FEEL SAFE NOW

[@imodium438]

__ Government Plan __ >> Set up 5G grid all over the country. >> Question health effects. >> Oops.

[@nourios6991]

Maybe because it doesn't exist yet?

[@pastagang4134]

I really wanna like 5g just to make you mad

[@kingyoung5228]

Nourios it does tho there are already phones out that have 5g capabilities like the s10

[@knutundthomasforever2959]

@@imodium438 Your right. This is their silent war (WWIII) to kill us off. People are already dying in California from 5G.

[@Synapsisify]

High frequency antennas on every 500 hundred feet, what can go wrong?

[@callmeastaire5700]

It's actually pretty low-frequency.

[@__J____ff]

@@callmeastaire5700 are you stupid or stupid as well as ignorance inducing ? millimeter wave (mmWave) bands are between 24-86 GHz

[@callmeastaire5700]

J compared to gammas or X-Rays?

[@eliasmi6495]

@@callmeastaire5700 ur ignorant and even much more haha Dude you are on the wrung topic we are talking about high-low frequencies and you ignorance doesn't help anybody

[@callmeastaire5700]

Elias Mi buddy go back to the psych ward.

[@driveman6490]

Will the wonder of 5G finnaly help me find the G-Spot?

[@rishikt]

you wish!

[@SeaJay_Oceans]

it won't matter, everyone will be sterilized by radiation and vape e-smokes !!! :-(

[@SeaJay_Oceans]

@@woodypigeon oh, ya - those are amazing videos when juuls explodes in peoples pockets and burn them with the flaming lithium battery ! There mom told them smoking was bad for their health. But seriously, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3719292/ The tiny amount of 1.0 mg/kg B.W. of nicotine is destructive to male fertility and bad news, destroys sex drive too... :-(

[@DrBeast-ui6fq]

Old man your just going to shorten your life with 5 g but go ahead take the easier way out

[@Ultamami]

*finnaly" ISN'T.A.WORD. SMDH Try "finally". How are you supposedly a grown adult but have no knowledge of BASIC ENGLISH!!??? You're a disgrace...and largely part of societies ruination/demise. Thanks

[@ananyachaudhuri3679]

So I can cook a movie in 1 minute and download my brain in half a second..

[@FILA23WHITEPRODUCTIONS]

You get it. In a funny way but you understand what 5g is.

[@vishnuvenugopal5078]

GPRS is 2g right? So technically 2g brought us the internet.

[@AnimMouse]

Nope, GPRS is 2.5g. And GPRS is an extension of 2g, not part of it.

[@lockhrt999]

no GPRS is 1G. EDGE is 2G.

[@jmmo20]

no. 1G is analogue. 2G is GSM and basically had no real data capability (you had to call a dial-up service). 2.5G is GPRS 2.6 or 2.75 EDGE is an evolution of GPRS basically bundling together several GPRS carriers (I believe it was 4xGPRS).

[@W4ReLL]

jmmo20 love your answer, it seems that you learned Telecommunications at school :D

[@jmmo20]

w4rell I'm old enough to have lived through all of those Gs

[@leo3238]

How is it "all you need to know", when you didn't mention anything at all about health concerns?

[@callmeastaire5700]

Leo Correa Jr those...don’t....exist.....

[@MultiDOUBTINGTHOMAS]

They didn't mention health concerns because there are none - except in the minds of scaremongers and charlatans who are making money on the backs of gullible fools who believe their nonsense.

[@voxveritas26]

You are the gullible fool if you think there are no dangers.

[@go-eeleleyah8611]

5G is the final step in the illuminate lizard people game to enslave the humane race, the true goal of the technology is to open gates into different dimensions allowing demons to enter our word, ride the 5G waves and posses people, all under the guidance of their leader zazo ...it's all true my cat told me all this, of course my cat's real identity is lord meow an intergalactic super intelligence that will eventually lead humanity into victory after the 10000 year war

[@TeranGGG]

Hi... Most of single antenna used commercial right now, transmitted around 43 dbm (20w) and received by your phone ranging from -80 dbm (10^-11 watt) to -120 dbm (10^-15 watt). It is save if you understand what is that number. But, there's another scientific perspective, like 3gpp who standardized 5g and local regulator aka government that can regulated how carrier operated.

[@rickybhattacharya6]

1:00 5 Technologies supportive of 5G network: _1) _*_Millimeter Waves_*_ -- __1:12_ _2) _*_Small Cell_*_ -- __2:02_ _3) _*_Massive MIMO_*_ -- __2:46_ _4) _*_Beamforming_*_ -- __3:19_ _5) _*_Full Duplex_*_ -- __4:21_

[@karimboucher3118]

No mention regarding the impact that may have in our health.

[@AnimMouse]

We have 4g in 3g speeds, nice.

[@444brandy]

Imagine the voices in your head & rapid rate of cancer we will gain!

[@ryanvandy1615]

Because 4G cannot handle the amount of data traffic anymore. Too many people watching too many videos, too many emails, uploading too many high resolution photos to facebook..... and you're contributing solely based on the data that was transferred from your comment.

[@ryanvandy1615]

Information has been sent over airwaves since the first radio was invented. This is nothing new.

[@Tata-iu3fy]

Ryan VanDenBerg I guess we are all contributing, including YOU!

[@kenshinyamamoto5855]

@@444brandy we wont get cancer from 5G radiation, it only has a freaquency of a microwave, the radiation is not even ionize or powerful enough to mutate out cells, visible light has more radiation freaquency than 5G, Sun emits ultraviolet

[@Livereater]

I'll wait for 6G

[@shobitsharma6690]

Lol in that case I m waiting for 7G 😂😂

[@faizfirdaus2967]

All of the commentors seem to have PhD in telecommunication engineering

[@suzesiviter6083]

I am not far off that qual, but even I do not know the long term effects of high power higher Ghz frequencies, I do know it will effect the cells in our bodies, the question is will it be enough to cause damage. Seems to me not enough testing has been conducted on this technology.

[@rhythm2mysoul.]

You don't need to have a PhD in order to have intelligent thought..Another lie that has been force fed to the world.All humans are intelligent and multidimensional... thus.. the reason for the eventual shut down if the NWO has it's way, regarding, this technology.Smart city.Smart people.Although won't be so smart in reality as it will be game over for the humans as we know it...

[@suzesiviter6083]

@Hernando Malinche That would make 5G between 1 and 10mm wavelength, I take it you are just using the eV @ wavelength for that calculation?. , so by your theory you could stick your head in a microwave oven since that has even less eV? ) lol. No in order to determine safety you need to look at the output power from the transmitter, in the case of 5G since it is higher frequency, it is also more directional/focused, therefore you need many closer proximity transmitters, that's why there is so many people having doubts on 5G's safety.

[@suzesiviter6083]

@@rhythm2mysoul. Do you take your car to be fixed by the dentist?. Yes quals do not mean intelligence, but they do mean you know more about a subject than someone who hasn't studied in that area.

[@suzesiviter6083]

@Hernando Malinche I am well aware of what Hz means, you miss my point, your comparison using eV is just plain wrong. Hence the microwave example. Neither did I say it gives you cancer(though Synchrotron radiation has been proved to cause cancer), it will make your head hot! Microwaves work at 2.4GHz, that has a lower eV than 'colour', yet is able to vibrate the molocules due to the 100 or so watts of radio power. So your theory on 5g safety is just wrong as you did not take transmitter power into account. Did you know people have been killed standing too close to high power VHF radio transmitters? As we increase frequency, we are more able to hit the resonant frequency of smaller structures so a 1mm wavelength will vibrate anything in your body with dimensions approximating 1mm. No scientist will disagree with what I have said, the only question is how much damage vs. power it will do to your body over a prolonged time period.

[@bbnCRLB]

3G wasn't the first to bring us online. 2G did with the slow GPRS, then EDGE.

[@outlierz1796]

why do I need this when my internet/wifi already provides such speeds?

[@callmeastaire5700]

Outlier Z because it can be faster.

[@outlierz1796]

@@callmeastaire5700 how does my wifi connected to fiber come up lacking in speed?

[@callmeastaire5700]

Outlier Z how do I know about your WiFi?

[@imodium438]

Wired will always beat wireless in terms of speed.

[@sasa_05]

Because it's not just about speed. It's about call quality and much more modernisation about which we will know only after we actually get to use it and as far as health is concerned we already interact with tons of cancer inducers and this tech is going to be another simple addition to it.

[@georgejefferson9962]

You can tell something is up when people can't even debate the comments talking about health concerns, only attack or mock them

[@Gongolongo]

Health concerns for 5G shouldn't be specific to 5G. We have TONS of of radiation everywhere especially EM. This is just not a new issue.

[@MultiDOUBTINGTHOMAS]

@@Gongolongo - Also, it should be noted that 5G is not a frequency band - it is a network architecture. It will employ several existing technologies and existing frequency bands. Some of the new higher frequency bands will be new to the mobile application - but, have been in use for many years in fixed wireless and satellite applications. There isn't really anything novel about 5G, except the way the different pieces are being put together. The concern about the use of higher frequencies is particularly misplaced as these will mostly be reflected, rather than absorbed by human tissue. Chill out folks!

[@Steffsh]

And you are a scientist?

[@jghifiversveiws8729]

Well there you go.

[@EyefulImages]

What we need is more time outside not virtual reality

[@Solid_Snake99]

fvcking boomer went gnee gnee on facebook

[@FredrichNietzsche25]

But isn't it possible that the frequency used for 5G could possibly propose a health risk?

[@callmeastaire5700]

LapseOfApathy no.

[@EvMstein]

Not more than radio frequency

[@jehoma]

@@callmeastaire5700 Jeez, you are such a shill. Are you part of the CIA troll squad?

[@FugieGamers]

Yes and no. The frequency is less than that of visible light, the light that surrounds us and so it's less energetic. The problem comes from intensity. Let's say you have a cell tower that sends out radiation with 500 Hz. The further you are from it the less intense it is, but the frequency is independent of distance. 5G technology will have very high intensity because it will be on every corner down the street. Adding to that microwaves are absorbed by H2O (aka all living things) and so you have something that could be harmful.

[@voiceofreason162]

It can kill. A test between 4 towers in Sweden downed a flock of birds. Basically they fell dead out of the sky.

[@massiah1314]

This is sick. And no not in a good way. 5G will be the end of us watch. Cell phone towers placed on top businesses and near homes have already reported earlier in age cancer diagnosis as well as the older folks too. A guy knew there was towers on his building and sure enough the pole right before entering the space with all the wire and antennas will say "danger high radio frequency" and when he opens the door you see a shit ton of wires and transmitters. The owner was diagnosed with cancer and his 25 year old son who he had been helping out for a year also was diagnosed with cancer. These things aren't safe. And 5G will kill us. Smh

[@kayar8463]

Radio waves dont cause cancer

[@kayar8463]

Turito Bassu maybe the massive ball of radiation that is strong enough to burn skin, if you actually believe these "scientifically proven" theories about how radio frequency waves cause cancer you need to do some research. The sun produces much more radiation in a minute than your phone would in its whole lifespan

[@massiah1314]

KayaR it's the frequencies at which they are at that is dangerous. And while you may think the sun is giving off more radiation that's where mainstream science would have one believe that. But I have done my research as well and it has turned up things that I'm not quite sure you're aware of because if you were you would have a different out look this topic. There is definitely dangerous amounts of radiation being emitted daily and the chem trails are also causing damage so we're being hit from all sides here. When people get cancer they'll think it was natural and was going to happen. And again that's what they want you to believe so that no one ever questions why has the cancer found in patients risen instead of fallen? They have a multi billion dollar industry the pharmaceutical mobsters they don't want to cure all the cancer or admit there's been a cure found. Because they want to depopulate the earth. If you don't believe me then do research. Like why do all the leaders meet at secret meetings? Or why were the stone tablets, known as the Georgia guidestones, erected? Did you know it's first rule or law is to maintain humanity under 500,000,000 people? That's killing off nearly the entire human population. Now before you comment things like "radio frequency doesn't cause cancer" actually look at what the findings are and you'll see that they CAN cause cancer amongst other biological health issues.

[@massiah1314]

Turito Bassu well you'd be wrong to think that but I'm sure I won't change your mind. Do some research on them. Maybe you'll find the rich fucks who put them up for laughs and ask them why? There's so much that goes on that the public is made aware of, and if it wasn't a stunt for laughs then what was it for?

[@kevin42]

NOTE: read the entire comment before replying, thanks There is a reason its called ”none ionizing radiation”. Using ur method of thinking, i would get cancer from simply cooking food as i expose myself to massive amounts of heat radiation from the stove. Or if im sitting beside a fire. As for the energy absorbed from none ionizing radiation, yes it can be dangerouse. But it all depends on strength and wave length. I could blast u with 50 Ghz wifi for 1h at -38 D/m2 of power and u would be fine, or i could blast u with 1h of micro(ironically micro waves arent that ”micro” in length but whatever that isnt the point) wave radiation(also none ionizing) and it would melt ur face off.Yet the wifi 50 Ghz was wayy wayyy higher energy in terms of wave length. The wave energy wifi, 5G, radio.. etc give off are neglegable in power, truly miniscule. An army of engneers have tried to come up with ways to get ”free energy” by turning radio wave energy in the air(from wifi, radio.. etc) to electrical energy for years. Yet failed miserably as the output was in the micro to mili volt range, AKA minimal amounts of actual power going though the air. So no, these radiation ammiters wont kill/give us cancer. Stop the nonesense

[@krinkle7695]

Does this mean we won't need to use condoms anymore since our sperm will evaporate?

[@dayyanadel724]

Wtf😂😂😂

[@bobhartman880]

No need for condoms 5G is going to cause a massive decline in fertility as well as a huge rise in death and disease.

[@Steffsh]

It won't hurt you. 5G reaches a maximum frequency of 95Ghz. X-rays (known to be harmful in the long run) reach a minimum of 30 petahertz (3×10^16 Hz). If it is harmful why is it being implemented in so many cites around the world? Do your research if you don't trust something.

[@hayleylewis11]

@@Steffsh Part of a massive depopulation agenda.

[@Steffsh]

But I just explained that it wont cause that you dingus

[@ArthurAugustyn]

IEEE really made the most helpful breakdown of complex/theoretical technology then never made another one again.

[@TheSpecialJ11]

These animations are surprisingly informative without sacrificing too much for simplification.

[@josiahfarnsworth5911]

"Just imagin downloading an HD move in under a second" just imagin getting cancer in under a second

[@osga21]

I need to know, ehre are you getting this information that 5G causes brain cancer?

[@auctoritate8254]

Josiah Farnsworth You won't get cancer from a cell tower because it's not ionizing radiation. You should read up on what ionizing radiation is- most radiation we come into contact with is harmless.

[@Mseguin13]

Not brain cancer... ANY CANCER!

[@Mseguin13]

Stetson Graham... oh yeah? Go ahead and tell that to a hyper electro sensitive person! Have you ever heard of it? You should read up on what it is too! It is true and it's getting worse! 33% of the population feel direct effects from wifi, cellphones, bluetooth and all other radiation.

[@FrainBart_main]

@Manon Séguin Is visible light or infra-red dangerous? They have thousands of times higher frequencies and sunlight at the surface of the Earth has millions of times higher power densities (excluding UV).

[@user-yd7we6ou3n]

"Just imagine getting blasted by invisible fire"

[@Khro]

@Hernando Malinche thank you

[@ChamGee]

@Hernando Malinche The frequency doesn't play a big role. What's relevant is the field intensity of the frequency since it's possible to cause harm with any frequency if the field intensity is high enough, which is the case for 5G.

[@Slenderman63323]

@@ChamGee How is it, exactly? I doubt you're exposed to kilowatts of energy all at once from 5G. The signal to your phone is a few watts at best, it's not constant either so there is no danger of cooking from 5G.

[@SeaJay_Oceans]

Back in 2008, some people were stilled allowed to speak the truth: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gGLaZZpoq9dqeJY millimeter waves in action...

[@SeaJay_Oceans]

@@Slenderman63323 ONE 5G transmitter will pass the safety tests... but walking in cities, you'll be flooded with dozens of towers blasting you with every step... Something like this, but below your ability to feel it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gGLaZZpoq9dqeJY

[@ChiefKorin]

everybody gangsta till the trees steal the internet

[@1kguero873]

No thanks 4G is my homie

[@johnmay9394]

IDGAFWA BGTSAM exactly

[@jehoma]

4G is horrible too. 5G is definitely worse!

[@Bryan-Hensley]

First off learn what 5g and 4g really is. kzbin.info/www/bejne/aJ_WdnStlLicqLM

[@warmcloud2218]

Fucck 5G he a bitch

[@ZigZag9639]

@@jehoma then why bother having an acct on here?

[@theeabster1983]

I would love to seeing somebody try to explain this to someone in the 50s. Unbelievable to shit we can do now

[@swalker157]

Actually they would probably understand it better because amateur radio culture was much strong then

[@carlitoxb110]

In Mexico people think doctors are stealing the liquid inside their knees to lube 5G antenas 😂😂😂

[@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS]

The crazy just keeps getting crazier.

[@misscillaaav]

Ha look at the trees and clouds trynna save us by asorbing it :'(((

[@jayknight139]

Oooh boy! I don't know about all this. 😰

[@87155]

God’s trying to save us

[@bertiebeetle3]

Unfortunately if it can structurally change our DNA? What do you think its doing to the trees and clouds. Explains why the weather is starting to go crazy worldwide. The 5G switches are happening now.

[@Steffsh]

It won't hurt you. 5G reaches a maximum frequency of 95Ghz. X-rays (known to be harmful in the long run) reach a minimum of 30 petahertz (3×10^16 Hz). If it is harmful why is it being implemented in so many cites around the world? Do your research if you don't trust something.

[@bertiebeetle3]

@Steffsh I highly suggest you watch Ian Ferguson channel. He is a line worker installing these things. You might change your mind.

[@RosyOutlook2]

Given the comments against 5G on this video I can say it does NOT gel with your likes. I've seen it on most official narrative video. Clearly controlled to your favor.

[@msheart2]

True we've seen lots of that manipulation.

[@drscott1]

This is potentially very dangerous technology. The video talks about the radiation being absorbed by rain and plants but do not talk about absorption in human skin!

[@theodordesousa5413]

www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/radiofrequency-radiation.html There is a reason why, it would only heat them a bit. And would just make your skin a bit warmer.

[@drscott1]

Theo de Sousa ok. Is that a full answer to all the unknowns this technology possesses. Early evidence shows a lot more problems then just a little heating. Lol

[@theodordesousa5413]

Well yes, it is not like this is some whole new kind of radio wave. We know how the rays work. Could you show me the "early evidence"?

[@hapaxl.6075]

+Dr Scott your subscription list shows links to perpetual motion type devices and the Thunderbolt project. Mind me if I take anything you say with a mining truck's worth of salt. So this is the next 'chemtrail' is it? I'm sure the flat-earthers will be overjoyed.

[@RosyOutlook2]

Hapax L. or is it Tampax you and your bleeding lies. Theo de Sousa studying engineering aka as how to control nature and humans.

[@Gezen-Adam]

The biggest threat to human life is man himself.

[@ThatMunyunGetYaDunyun]

No shit

[@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS]

Indeed, now if people could stop committing arson that would be GREAT.

[@NANA-tz7ep]

@@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS It would better if the government wasn't trying to control the weather and desiccating our environment... vermontindependent.net/california-burning-ground-zero-for-us-geoengineering-our-geoengineering-age-essay-10/ www.5gspaceappeal.org/ www.stopbitburning.com/ Stop Agenda 21 everyone!

[@nickthegreek8884]

As u can assume:Full control of every move...

[@milas1976]

WE will all be in the Truman Show

[@milas1976]

This video shows how they already track everyone in China using this technology

[@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS]

You people are so scared of improved technology that it apparently becomes a violation of your very rights. It's literally just faster speed. If they didn't say anything, none of you would be talking about this.

[@commonlinkproductions]

Everything you need to know about 5G - except for any of the health and social consequences. Well done!

[@tim3854]

@@r3d0c love it how intelligent people just get abused these days

[@WhoisRoach]

There is no need to worry about 5g towers, they are safe, stupid

[@SwitchedDreams]

Fr

[@dnb5661]

And how much of a commerical failure it is.

[@helix7564]

I am shocked by the comments. People are so under-educated.

[@640A]

Thankfully these people are NOT sleeping sheep like you who are being brought to the slaughterhouse!

[@paul6082]

Oh so you saying 5g is good? Can you explain ?

[@nzautoarts]

agreed. Ppl always want a faster horse before car be invented.

[@anonash81]

@IlIllIIl lllIlllIlI you don't have a clue what you're talking about. There are routers that support 5GHz, but are not 5G. Two completely different things. 5G means 5th Generation. 5GHz (in the routers you're referring to), means 5 GigaHertz. This 5G referred to in the video is millimetre wave focused (whilst backwards compatible with lower frequencies), in the range 24-86 GHz. Do a bit of research into 5G dangers and 5G health risks. And stop sucking tech company dick.

[@adhahanif9792]

Why do I feel 5g network will have lag in their network.

[@ieeeyccestudentbranch3997]

AR VR with 5G will be 🔥

[@annseven7166]

Aren't millimeter waves also misused as torture tech weapons against civilians?

[@_zproxy]

ah. microwave weapons.

[@Strawman333]

There's always a price to pay for advancing technology. And, I don't mean money.

[@brightshadowdnb3301]

Yuup. QR reading tirrany this time

[@dredayalldayerday]

I've watched like six videos on what 5G is and they keep saying downloading movies, and I can't stop thinking "who the hell downloads movies anymore, what year is this?!"

[@baileyldn8174]

Since you know more about 5G, is fiber optic faster?

[@GhostLightPhilosophy]

“Everything you need to know” Sounds like “everything we want you to know so that you won’t feel the need to do your own research”

[@thegoldenraspberry1018]

Please do your own research then. Search on safe, scientific sites

[@r3d0c]

@paul w yep, nothing burger; thanks for confirming

[@whowillyoucallonthen4292]

Wait. So you're saying trees & rain can "absorb" the signal... And, we're just supposed to ignore the obvious implications for our actual bodies? Sign me up! 😐

[@Steffsh]

And you are a scientist?

[@booperdooper4555]

Paper can absorb alpha radiation, and so can the skin, but the skin faces no adverse affects from it.

[@bobaldo2339]

@@Steffsh Maybe he just isn't a sucker.

[@LanceGiller]

I don't think the trees or rain are damaged by absorbing the electromagnetic radiation... they absorb solar radiation just fine, heck they die without it..... the absorption is bad for the user that wanted to receive the data and didn't get it... The raindrop does not give a shit, and the plants don't care about your service either....

[@iamericmorrison]

Just imagine your mitochondrial Dna (mtdna) breaking down under the next layer of directional non native Emf .

[@WolfangStudios73]

It won't, the frequency range is non-ionizing, it'll only heat tissue at extreme power levels, similar to a microwave oven. Fun fact: your cellphone can only produce 2 watts of RF power Max

[@RAWRCoding]

Absolutely mad! and very very scary!

[@purelyconscious2546]

You forget to mention that "millimeter" wave means MICROWAVE.

[@horserose17]

5G IS LIKE STINKING YOUR HEAD IN MICROWAVE

[@joeljones585]

r c Dont mind if I do

[@thecommunistowl811]

No millimeter is the distance between the waves not the wavelengths meaning that the radiowaves are still non ionising and therefore harmless

[@roberthernandez782]

Millimeter waves are electromagnetic (radio) waves typically defined to lie within the frequency range of 30-300 GHz. The microwave band is just below the millimeter-wave band and is typically defined to cover the 3-30-GHz range

[@thecommunistowl811]

@@roberthernandez782 finally someone who isn't an idiot

[@Blissfulserene3452]

This thing is very dangerous guys. They are not telling us their real purpose of this thing. We should avoid it while we can. Or better yet, before the whole A.I and the internet of things get out of control.

[@imodium438]

I'm with you! If I see a 5G tower anywhere near my neighborhood, I'm going to vandalize it. I suggest everyone do the same! They can't force these 5G towers on us if we all band together and refuse to have them setup! - Just say no!

[@k-4452]

Adams Julien shut the fuck up so you’re saying that scientists wasted all their years of university?

[@leodarksam6230]

Lmao!

[@VideoNOLA]

The letters IoT appear in "Idiot".

[@djlr96]

Thatll be the day

[@mateyko555]

What kind of nonsense is this. Treating 3kHz-6GHz as one and claiming that spectrum over 6GHz is clear? oh please

[@AnimMouse]

mateyko555 Then, my ruler claims that 1 - 100 cm as one.

[@hans7701]

I was thinking the same thing. 6GHZ signals get stopped by an obstructions like leaves and humidity. I don't see them being feasible for wide-scale data transmission.

[@AnimMouse]

Hans That's why small cell is needed.

[@carolynmmitchell2240]

they are going to put them on all the street lights and shit.. we are going to be blasted with microwaves it's fucked up

[@unsettledroell]

mateyko555 they are planning to use 26GHz, which is where A LOT of spectrum is available, which allows for super high speed communication. Everything below 6GHz is very much taken already. Obviously below 500Mhz the spectrum is useless for internet communication :p

[@outsidetesseract6389]

better title: The Only Things You Need to Know About 5G

[@ahmadzaklouta]

The guy who is walking with mobile phone looks like someone carrying a machine gun

[@coffeeblak86]

this is all the same shit they said about 3g lol

[@moover123]

coffeeblak86 why shit?

[@SkullKing11841]

coffeeblak86 And it was true then. Usage has increased a lot since then. We will need 6G one day too when 5G is relatively slow.

[@MrGollum1996]

SkullKing11841 when you want to download 64K (not 4K) movies (3D format or better, VR-Format of course) in under a second whilst downloading a retro game like GTA V (yes on your mobile device) in under 1 second, then you need 6G

[@moultan]

SkullKing11841 I think you need 10G for your lifestyle.

[@VMan776]

MrGollum1996 The human eye can barely benefit from 8K over 4K (if at all) due to how well it can make out images, so 64K would be massively overkill.

[@Heat040]

This technology is dangerous

[@alexhein1738]

Heat040 not really they used 6g or 7g in blade runner 2049

[@RosyOutlook2]

Alex Hein you brainwashed fool that's a movie meant to brainwash you into thinking they did !

[@alexhein1738]

RosyOutlook2 no shit. It’s gonna happen tho in that year

[@blexino3828]

How

[@r3d0c]

Noi you fucking moron

[@bobyplayzyt]

Guys I am going in Chernobyl its safer in there.

[@mridulbarman4114]

Couldn't agree more with you. It's of course safer in Chernobyl.

[@mridulbarman4114]

@Mario Thank you for your information. We really need people like you.

[@tim3854]

@@mridulbarman4114 lol he's wrong, it's a weapons system

[@eruno_]

What's up with crazy conspiracy theories. There are no serious health concerns. I live in 4G city and we are planning to moving to 5G

[@redfacebaby9952]

ユーネ / Yuune no id believe him the people who make “5g” dont give af abt the public bandwith there is always a double meaning for something

[@thatcrazymf7658]

Anybody knows any scientific article that descibes all or some of the technologies mentioned in this video? If yes please give me the Citation :)

[@germancampos1498]

Greetings. This video is from IEEE... you may start looking for in their huge collection.

[@PsychoPetro]

imagine downloading an HD video in under a second..... Imagine getting cancer in under a second!!

[@txm100]

Imagine getting a brain and not assuming stupid stuff

[@jehoma]

@Henry the meme machine Quit it with these "visible lights have higher frequencies" comments. Visible light is created naturally these frequencies aren't. It doesn't make sense to compare the two.

[@cjholt633]

it is amazing how no one seems to be concerned about health issues and 5G

[@SwitchedDreams]

fast forward 5 years, and look at the cancer rates

[@lifeasbestfriendsTX]

There isn't any issues with 5G

[@andrewwest7839]

See I want my speed so fast that I blow my shorts out and start smoking....now that's real speed!!

[@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS]

This comment was a trip

[@zinmar3406]

Very nice video to understand!! I want know how to determine frequency to design 5 G antenna for research.

Oncologist are licking their chops.

[@MrConformation]

Exactly.... this is how the industry (as a whole) write their own paycheck.

[@Byefriendo]

All three of you are fucking insane lol

[@EclecticSceptic]

Source? I'm so sick of people making bold claims without evidence. That is known as religious belief.

[@Byefriendo]

@@EclecticSceptic lol yes

[@EclecticSceptic]

@@Byefriendo Didn't you hear? Paranoia + dogmatism = subversive.

[@duke_of_destruction]

just imagine living in a microwave . .... but as long as someone gets faster WiFi it's all good....... Well depopulation is an actual truth and behold this is the way it begins

[@fcz64]

And there's not a damn thing you or I can do to stop it. Nada, Nuttin. Ziltch.. Live life to your fullest. Enjoy everyday you have left on this earth. If Not 5G, They'd kill us all another way. It's a no win situation. U can deal with it. Or u can just blow your brains out now and get it over with.

[@r3d0c]

Noi you fucking moron

[@morsiskoPC]

No it's not the same as living in microwave. You are really extremally stupid if you think so. I will try to explain it like for kids in kindergarten: Imagine you are inside a car. Now you are getting hit by housefiles one by one, lets say the housefly hit your car with speed similar to 0.1km/h, and it happens 1000 times. Now imagine that you got hit by car that was moving with speed like 100km/h. Do you see the difference? The same applies to wifi and microwave. The router emits the waves with power similar the 0.1W, while the microwave emits the waves with power higher than 1000W. If the waves are on the same frequency it doesn't mean they will blow your brain or something similar.

[@jehoma]

@@morsiskoPC I doubt he actually meant it literally. Even if he did the health concerns are still there. Oh and calling someone "extremely stupid" doesn't exactly make you sound clever yourself.

[@morsiskoPC]

@@jehoma That call doesn't make me sound clever, however another part of the message acually does, at least smarter than the foilhead that talks bullshits

[@gsaldana22]

Don't cellular base stations have duplexers to allow TX and RX on the same antenna? Two way radio has had that for a long time.

[@paulanderson79]

They do indeed.

[@tonyatfox]

I and quite a few would be happy with old tech that was simple and safe to use!

[@catherinemurray2211]

This is the grid system and radiation that will control each one of you that's what this is

[@fcz64]

And You. Don't forget yourself. If I'm going to be fried. So will everyone else.

[@catherinemurray2211]

Nigward nonneed for this

[@catherinemurray2211]

Offchili no

[@skycombat]

Just imagine brain cancer.

[@LucaskrillHC]

Gio Arenas YOU'RE RIGHT. Do you know that there's also a VERY POISONING electromagnetic wave which reaches 750 TERAHERTZ (750'000 Gigahertz, when this CANCEROUS uses 30GHZ) and it's really dangerous because of its frequency that hit us EVERYDAY? IT'S CALLED....... Visible light. And this is why you should study something about electromagnetic waves

[@shubhampreetsingh8630]

Lucaskrill HC In the face... Hahaha, you're right bro, these people didn't even studied high school physics.

[@nokomismn9685]

skycombat - Head and neck tumors are more common today because people press cellphones to their ears.

[@avinashreji60]

nokomis mn Moron

[@stevesilverstone4385]

All the comments you see here are from religious idiots who're beginning to feel really uncomfortable from the fact that science is sky rocking humanity and most importantly exposing their fairy tales believes. 5G will happen, so will 6G and life on Mars and many other planets. this is just the beginning. few hundred years from now religion will be gone and people will stop living in denial and accept reality.

[@sym9266]

What does it do to plants/animals? Not one mention of whether or not its safe to use, being as the waves are so much more powerful than 4G

[@invisableobserver]

Animal & plant life are more electromagnetic hypersensitive that people

[@lifeasbestfriendsTX]

It dosent do anything to them

[@paopaowell]

guys in future we will use LiFi not WiFi because 4G is WiFi and 5G is LiFi

[@VarunVarun]

All i can say is 'Cancer' 😐

[@nonenope886]

Film Maker your a dumbass

[@tylerh2429]

Katone Vi but lets be real tho... we need a mass killing in the world. We dont need 7 billion people in the world its just to much for the earth to sustain. Let the 5g get implemented, half the population dies and then boom look at that no more traffic jams, shorter lines at the airport, and only waiting 10 minutes to get on a ride at disney.

[@im_only_air6841]

GamingVortex Creation of jobs to clean up the mass amounts of bodies. We'd also have an abundance of fertilizer. (:

[@WhiteSteveHarvey]

GamingVortex Would you still be saying "we need a mass killing for the earth to sustain" if your whole family dies in the process???

[@tylerh2429]

formatt yeah and take me out with them.

[@slaviboy]

That's amazing, soon they can download your personal data in just seconds. That's exciting :D

[@ashleighmiltgen9852]

slaviboy They do that already 😂

[@DrBeast-ui6fq]

slaviboy cancer is also exciting it comes with 5g have fun with that :D

[@kazana03]

It is comforting to know that the 5G towers on light poles right next to homes and apartment windows put out 5,750 times more radiation than 4G phones.

[@germancampos6265]

I disagree with you on that... have you made the math? dBm calculations?

[@annmorgana2848]

so should there a petition to demand that the who or some world research organization create a comprehensive study of positive and negative effects of 5g technologies? i think we can demand a study of both sides of the picture. i’m not so cynical to think that we cannot collectively demand to see comprehensive research data.

[@MeekMagus]

No, it's just a matter of whether there is enough funding and support to do the necessary studies and whether the industry would get out of the way enough to slow the expedient rollout to allow that science to be done fully.

[@Icybubba]

This comment section is toxic

[@logosknight54]

onee Haha, judging by your very poorly informed comment you don’t understand the situation very well. In order to inform yourself I would recommend you to watch this video that was made by a scientist. I will send you a link

[@david-Davidson]

This is the nut-job section of the internet, it started on www.abovetopsecret.com like a decade ago, now they're this massive group of morons plaguing the internet. When is Obama going to reveal the aliens guys? 🤔🤦‍♂️

[@logosknight54]

Yeah, it got cancer from 5g

[@dandavis8300]

@@david-Davidson --Never heard of that site. But if you open your eyes, you will see that a lot of young people have got extremely dependent on their cell phones and other technology and people today are not terribly effective in the real world. Kids don't seem to play outside anymore. This is not good. It's a sad waste of life. With 5G I expect college students will be going to classes by following their 5G "gps" thingy and wouldn't know how to get there without it. I don't know if it will cause cancer but it will certainly cause more atrophy of the human intellect and facilitate surveillance. If you think my comments are crazy, let me know why? Of course I've probably already been shadow banned...

[@david-Davidson]

@@dandavis8300 People said the same thing when we invented backhoes that it would make all the manual ditch-diggers obsolete. and we'll all rely on mechanical technology which will destroy the world. This was in the 1800's - did Mechanics ruin the world? No.

[@AngusMurray]

"Thanks" for telling me "everything" I need too know about 5g

[@Heavonlea]

She failed to mention how dangerous it is to your health!

[@Khro]

@@Heavonlea but it isn't you fucking idiot. This doesn't even come close to the range of Ionizing radiation. People like you are the reason why progress is never made. Instead of actually focusing on problems you ignorantly attack things that would help humanity advance.

[@bendriscoll4758]

@@Khro All except one thing sir, I myself am an engineer and I can assure that this progress is unnecessary. It will take away not only your health with it's wave lengths going under regulations that was already common knowledge to not explore, it will open up technology that will take away only your humanity if you do happen to survive. Life isn't only about progress, it's about living too. Sure, it's always nice to make things better, but to not even be able to get up and do something without some robot doing it for you is unacceptable.

[@Khro]

@@bendriscoll4758 Nigga, you illiterate or smthn? Don't lie about being engineer lol it clear you don't know what you're talking about

[@bendriscoll4758]

@@Khro I went to a vocational high school to learn about communications, and electrical systems. I am literally a graduate, but that's aside the point right now, it's also the fact that your humanity can be taken away at essentially any second with the unnecessary improvement. I can repair things as long as I want to, but I will never build something new, because it will tumble down to something even more like a snowball rolling down the hill. It's what our world will come to be that you should be concerned about.

[@springgarden1]

1000more times and I am watching this in 2020,

[@leguy42]

This video is, by far, the best explanation I have seen of 5G technologies. Great job!.

[@nicoxis]

2 concerns: Wouldn't beam forming reveal the exact location of every device in the network? (privacy issue?) What about coverage? needing exponential amount of antennas impact this? Even 4G struggles having much longer wavelength...

[@dimasdwikurniawandwikurnia3233]

😘😗

[@lifeasbestfriendsTX]

5g and 4g can coexist so in rural areas they can have 4g and in cities and big areas they can have 5g

[@lifeasbestfriendsTX]

And if beam forming did reveal out location that is actually good bc then if we call 911 they can pinpoint out location better

[@raptor2569]

"experts don't even know". wtf? you mean you don't. also who are these "experts"? humm?

[@jacopog2691]

raptor2569 they mean that it's not sure jet what technology will be used. Now they just have many different prototypes and ideas, but there is no "standard" 5g jet. Just some technologys that likely will be used for 5g

[@moover123]

Jack. G which jet?

[@DanSlotea]

if they don't know, they are not experts

[@jessstuart7495]

Telecom executive: Just have our engineers add another G. How hard can that be?

[@keeper0523]

sources say... scientists agree... experts say...

[@sai4fun]

In future, To get 10 g speed every smartphone becomes signal antenna tower

[@hafikhmohamad6202]

5G: more invisible signal for human Birds: Fxck you human! *Then, their brain cooked

[@lastbreed2465]

Technology will bring about de end of humanity . Facts

[@antiwar8859]

That's what they said about cars back in the day

[@antpr2]

@@antiwar8859 true talk

[@MackyClemen]

says the guy that uses one

[@ArtDesignHobby]

@@antiwar8859 While mercury, lead, rad and tobacco were considered safe...

[@ShadowFalcon]

@Steve Point me to an area in the visible universe that isn't being "blasted by radiation daily" please.

[@whybolo9793]

Nwo control grid

[@davidroshbach5426]

i hate to say it.. but you are devastatingly right

[@ProfiresKnight]

It's fun coming to the comments and seeing that some people don't fully understand the word radiation.

[@robertlong2531]

Didn't quite understand from this how you can get full duplex on the same frequency - won't you block yourself?

[@WolfangStudios73]

I'm two years late but: Time and frequency division multiple acces (T/FDMA) one transmits at a time, per channel, either server or subscriber. The role of TX/RX switches many times a second

[@chucktrotter1793]

the internet of things = the surveillance of EVERYTHING,not to mention weaponized millimeter waves. Oh gee I cant wait to download movies in under a second

[@RepublicOfCatyes]

yeah and if you trade your brain for a microchip u can also WATCH movies under a second!

[@morsiskoPC]

You certainly don't know what the Internet of Things means

[@ultimatesin3544]

Why do you frame it like users want this? I don't know anybody who is dissatisfied with their current smartphone and wants to take on potential health risks to marginally increase how fast an email is sent or a SMS goes out.. This has so many health risks that we are taking on so some people can make alot of money and have full surveillance control over the populace..

[@auctoritate8254]

Ultimate Sin there are no health risks. And we're not really going to be spied on any more than we already are, I mean they can spy on us as much as they need with 4G. But you are right that people aren't asking for it- but we should still develop it, because in the next few years 4G networks will just be *full*. In big cities they're already crowded. It's kind of a benefit to the companies who provide service, primarily, with a benefit to consumers secondarily.

[@RosyOutlook2]

Stetson Graham that is a bold face lie

[@MechInvent]

Yeah.... typical propaganda

[@TonyFisherPuzzles]

Can't wait. Hilarious all the flat earther type comments here.

[@rtucci3643]

Fucking labeler.

[@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS]

It is less hilarious when you realise these people are allowed to vote.

[@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS]

@Roland Roland News flash, Murica not the only country.

[@rtucci3643]

@Duke Hugh Johnson no, I described a person's action to label. A label is "a classifying phrase or name applied to a person or thing, especially one that is inaccurate or restrictive.

[@redlineracing4947]

Yes. Your digs are stupendous. The earth IS flat.

[@ODexiko]

it's so loud I can't hear my thoughts from all these 5g waves going true my brain, can you please lower it a bit down?

[@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS]

Is this a joke or?

[@7msjster]

What do people do that don't want all that 4g is fine 12 mbp is enough for me but I feel like I will be forced to have it just because of the overhaul unifying communication.

[@hemanth6951]

what about health by more radiation?

[@nonenope886]

Hemanth SP ok i'm going to basic science your ass we are hit by more low energy radiation from the sun and stars than cell towers

[@hemanth6951]

what science your ass meaning??

[@HelloWorld_42]

Hemanth SP anything with a longer wavelenght than uv is non ionizing radiation, that means it cant hurt DNA and other molecules. Most radio or miliwaves can do is heat surfaces, so aslong as we arent noticably getting charred everytime we walk outside, we will be ok.

[@WirelessAction]

Seriously? Are you implying that as long as our skin doesn't burn from these frequencies, it must be safe? These are typical beliefs of someone who knows nothing about the actual science behind non-ionizing radiation. Non-ionizing radiation does not have enough energy to directly break DNA bonds, but it can through various mechanisms indirectly cause DNA damage and mutations AND weaken the immune system. This means that diseases like cancer will develop much more easily. Furthermore, 70% of peer-reviewed non-industry funded studies show that there ARE biological health effects from non-ionizing radiation. Read some science before spewing lies.

[@auctoritate8254]

Wireless Action Then why hasn't everyone grown a bunch of tumors from their microwave ovens, which produce non ionizing radiation? And by the way, I'm not implying that as long as it doesn't burn your skin, it's safe. In fact, microwave radiation CAN burn your skin and still be safe. There has been technology developed that allows microwaves to be fired at a person, and it feels like your skin is burning, but it actually does no damage to you whatsoever because it can't penetrate deeper than the very surface of your skin.