No video

In the matter of an application by RM (two linked appeals)(UKSC 2022/0144; UKSC 2022/0145) - [2024]

  Рет қаралды 1,199

UKSupremeCourt

UKSupremeCourt

5 ай бұрын

RM suffers from a severe mental impairment. On 2 March 2018, RM was charged for a series of violent and sexual offences. RM was found unfit to plead to the charges but was held to have committed the alleged acts.
The Crown Court imposed a Hospital Order and a Restriction Order on RM. RM was detained in a psychiatric ward in hospital.
On 16 January 2019, RM made an application for discharge to the Tribunal. The expert medical evidence before the Tribunal indicated that RM would shortly begin receiving treatment outside of hospital in a community-based setting as part of a period of testing.
Under Article 78 of the Order, a patient may only continue to be detained if they are suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or degree which warrants their detention in hospital for medical treatment.
The Tribunal acknowledged that RM's care plan would involve him moving to live in a community-based setting but considered that he would nonetheless remain a patient receiving treatment in hospital.
RM brought an application for judicial review of the decision of the Tribunal arguing that his continued detention was unlawful in light of the treatment plan advanced in medical evidence which did not envisage further treatment in hospital.
The High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the decision of the Tribunal. However, the Court of Appeal overturned the decisions of the Tribunal and High Court holding that they had erred in law. The Tribunal and Department of Justice now jointly appeal to the Supreme Court.
The issue is:
Whether the Review Tribunal (the Tribunal) was entitled to conclude that RM's mental disorder continues to be of a nature or degree warranting his continued detention in hospital for medical treatment (i.e. whether the test for discharge from a Restriction Order under Article 78 of the Mental Health (Northern Ireland) Order 1986 (the Order) is met).
More information is available on our website

Пікірлер
Lipton and another (Respondents) v BA Cityflyer Ltd (Appellant)
13:54
Кадр сыртындағы қызықтар | Келінжан
00:16
Survive 100 Days In Nuclear Bunker, Win $500,000
32:21
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 152 МЛН
I'm Excited To see If Kelly Can Meet This Challenge!
00:16
Mini Katana
Рет қаралды 34 МЛН
The Judges: Power, Politics and the People - Episode 2 - Lord Neuberger
59:51
The University of Law
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Jersey Choice Ltd (Appellant) v His Majesty's Treasury (Respondent)
8:40
Chief Justice John Roberts on the topic of writing
14:55
courtpoint
Рет қаралды 117 М.
A History of Gloucester Cathedral | Hidden Gems in the Cotswolds
11:13
The Cotswold Explorer
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Home seller secretly films 11 estate agent valuation appointments
29:14
Moving Home with Charlie
Рет қаралды 329 М.
Кадр сыртындағы қызықтар | Келінжан
00:16