Indiana Jones Path Tracing Graphics looks Mindblowing

Indiana Jones and The Great Circle
new update with Path Tracing graphics options
Full Ray Tracing is going real time, unleashing interactive, photorealistic 3D environments filled with dynamic light and shadow, reflections and refractions
RTX 4080
Ryzen 5800x3d
32GB Ram
Max Settings 4K DLSS Quality Frame Gen OFF

[@Mlage4TheWin]

Wow, this makes me wish for a remastered peter Jacksons king kong game with this engine. That game for the ps2 was sick!

[@ivantg3412]

Amazing Game. Absolutly amazing.

[@Geraltofrivia12gdhdbruwj]

That game brings so much childhood memory

[@WUKONGSerieS10GBofRAM]

30 fps lol

[@purefoldnz3070]

“May he who illuminated this, illuminate me.” -Henry Jones Sr

[@atomsmurf]

Cries in 8GB VRAM

[@kamranki]

I am pretty sure there is plenty of rasterization happening that is mixed cleverly with RT pipeline to create a sort of hybrid RT implementation. Look at flames / torches; totally raster implementation.

[@askers81]

id tech is known for having baked in effects,

[@kamranki]

@askers81 I wish there was a mode to turn off all rasterization and make the game run 100% ray traced. It would definitely kill the fps but would be a cool thing to play around with.

[@askers81]

​@@kamrankithe flame isn't rasterized, it's a texture made to look like a flame. it's still immisive so its still pathtraced. I don't think a particle effect flame like that would look good

[@kamranki]

@@askers81 It is not emissive and does not seem to be emitting any light of its own. It might be a texture, with a point light attached to it to cast shadows. But the flame itself is not emitting any light.

[@askers81]

@@kamranki Idk how to respond, they look emissive to me.

[@yevheniibatiievskyi]

I'm playing this game and The Shadow of the Tomb Raider. As far as I can tell - the difference is so subtle, both games looks incredible in terms of terrain and ancient architecture. But the performance wise they are different.

[@kinglew0773]

The fact that my 4080 can’t even run this…

I can see how beautiful the game looks but with the requirements is something im not sure i could play on until several generations after when more gpus are powerful and cheaper

[@miwoj]

i have 2080 and this game runs perfectly in 60fps with everything on ultra except textures on medium. its a very well optimized game.

[@af4396]

UE4 and 5 are such sh*t engines that it's refreshing to see what a proprietary engine can do again. Welcome back, ID Tech 7. Now, let's see Doom TDA! Also, i understand UE has these features + their lumen and nanite and stuff, but it doesnt look that great and it seems NO developers can actually optimize it to get it to run anywhere close to 60fps without slapping heavy FSR or DLSS. The fact that Xbox Series X runs this (albeit with lower than low PC settings) at 60fps and 1800p is amazing, quite frankly. NO unreal engine game will do that. 4A, Id Tech, maybe the now retired Red engine... but UE? No way, what a piece of sh*t engine.

[@oropher1234]

myeah, i think Unreal Engine can theoratically push out a better looking picture, i mean you can implement path tracing on Unreal as well of course. But yeah, it's a pretty shitty performer in general. There is only a couple of games that run without major hitches on UE5. The Finals for example, but doesnt use lumen nor nanite, but does use probebased RTGI. And then you have Remnant 2, which does use nanite, but no lumen or any raytracing. My guess is just that enabling all those features creates some heavy overhead on the CPU, which probably isn't necessary at all, but Epic doesn't really seem to want to fix it. They just want to show off that pretty picture to all these inexperienced devs and hope they go wow. However, many devs are gamers, and now with UE game's reception not being all that good, surely some will shift their focus and use something that looks great but doesn't stutter all the time.

[@TECHNOARMOUR]

its one of the best engines out there for the quality of graphics it produces no engine comes close and the overhead comes from nanite n lumen being system taxing but lumen rtgi produces some of the best lighting out of any game even stray the ue4 game somehow produces better ambiance than cyberpunk with ray tracing

[@philippossnortis2035]

@@TECHNOARMOUR oh please, RED engine, ID Tech 8, Cry Erngine are better and run much smoother! no one likes stutter engine 5!

[@TECHNOARMOUR]

@@philippossnortis2035 just cap fps at 60fps in ue5 games n there will be 0stutter simple fix. N I’ve tried every game with highest quality graphics n ue5 with nanite n lumen is superior. Only game which comes close is remedy games with its in-house engine

[@af4396]

@TECHNOARMOUR Objectively, it's not. For a list of features maybe, but not the actual product.

[@Pascualegea]

👍👍👍👍👍

[@noahb7947]

and you only need a 4090 to run these settings at 160p with DLSS performance frame generation turned on

[@askers81]

not really. a 2080 will run the game ultra 1080p at 60fps without frame generation

[@huiAPPOAJ]

why does it always look either washed out or over/underexposed? to be honest it doesn't look pleasant to look at, there must be something wrong with the HDR setup 0:20 and 1:45 look especially bad

[@silentgaming2487]

looks definitely amazing, but still there is plenty of obvious pop in of shadows at 1:03 which kinda ruins the immersion

[@Creationseed9]

that is lod

[@Creationseed9]

And you can edit it in console. Please learn the difference, and stop posting bad info on internet.

[@Kubcio_88]

And where are the people who say it looks like it's on PS3?

[@RugsterClaps]

was looking for a comment like this. It blows my mind people could say such dumb things.

[@J1025.]

I wanna play with path tracing so bad but the 12gb vram on my 4070 ti wont allow it. its a shame because I would quite happily go down from my usual 70fps with PT off to 30fps PT on but when I turn it on I get 3-4 fps lol edit: for anyone with a 4070 ti, I messed around with the settings and was actually able to get the game to run with path tracing on @ 4k. set textures & shadows to med, and use DLSS quality. expect fps in the 30s though

[@MountyWolf]

It should have DLSS as an option I guess for more FPS? 😅

[@Danuxsy]

yea this game eat vram for some reason

[@J1025.]

@@MountyWolf I was actually about to come back here to edit my comment because I tried switching from DLAA PT off to DLSS quality PT on and I'm only JUST below the VRAM limit at 11.5gb haha. I dropped from 75 fps to 35 fps at the very starting area of the game (the forest) but it's a pretty good compromise tbh

[@MountyWolf]

@@J1025. Haha alright, nice nice :D !

[@nismo2070]

@@Danuxsy The visuals are memory intensive. This game looks really good!

[@squirrelsinjacket1804]

Really hope GTA 6 on PC has path tracing

[@Zamaric]

I'd be shocked if it didn't

[@squirrelsinjacket1804]

@Zamaric I don't think that even the ps5 pro is powerful enough for it so I would be surprised if Rockstar even bothers adding it only for PC.

[@Zamaric]

@@squirrelsinjacket1804 they added dlss to rdr2 so I can see them adding path tracing at some point

[@ImperialDiecast]

looks like this was recorded in 30fps

[@gwathanaur]

worse, it seems it was recorded with unlocked framerate, and now it stutters like crazy one put in a fixed frequency video. Recording it at 30 fps would have been the way to do it, and would look quite smooth.

[@CRF250R1521]

@@gwathanaur thats correct

[@GrooveSpaceArk]

I'm poor and I'm coping

[@cristianroth8524]

Mindblowingly similar to RDR 2, to be precise. No visual element of this game justifies the absurd requirements.

[@PuluSus]

even with the mandatory RT Global Illumination lighting the game runs just fine unless you're running a toaster as your computer.

[@lau6438]

RDR2 is great, but it's graphics are no match to a fully path traced image. No need to be a liar.

[@frankiegarcia7601]

Nooo😂in play both not even close😂

[@ramirezrem]

What?? Rdr 2 has a lot worse graphic than this

[@PuluSus]

@@lau6438 path tracing may produce better visual quality but overall rdr2 looks still way better than this, Indy is no match to rdr2 overall visuals/art assets.

[@SaltySpget]

yeah my 3080ti would explode

[@f1amesoff]

Actually, not. Because it's not UE5.

[@turkeyman9914]

I would gladly use it if it didn’t consume so much vram. Not even my 4070 can run it at more than 10 fps.

[@kamikazu4392]

Xbox series x run this smooth at 60fps

[@turkeyman9914]

@ The series x version does not use path tracing

[@1337-exe]

it’s ok ,i can’t run the game on my GTX 1070 but I didn’t paid for the game 😂

[@doanamo]

Stuttering and performance is what looks "mindblowing"

[@scoobiroobiroo]

I don't know how people dont get sick watching this. Gives me motion sickness from the lag.

[@metroshifter]

No stuttering in this game buddy.. What you see here is capture card issues on youtube. I run this game in silk buttery smooth fps maxed out on pc.

[@TheSelfAwareIndianEmpath]

graphics are great no doubt but there are other games which look more impressive than this and they don't eat 12 GBs of VRAM to achieve that realism. Wonder how's that possible. Maybe this game's engine has high VRAM buffer requirements compared to other game engines.

[@metroshifter]

I cannot come up with one (in this scale) on PC.. It would be a modded cyberpunk or Senuss Saga perhaps.. No ne of the sony games (for example) on PC comes close to this when it comes to jawdroppers in terms of density, volumetrics, lightning or Path / Ray Tracing.. Take it to the bank.

[@mehrzadsaremi5903]

To my eyes it's only slightly more realistic than The Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Indicative of how little games have graphically improved within the past 5-6 years.

[@aXque]

It really doesn't look that good. Look at the leaves, a lot of low texture assets in general. The environments and the artistic direction is cool at times tho.

[@MultiNatla]

tell me again why must this be real-time?

[@drinferno13]

Unless Nvidia can deliver some breakthrough ray tracing performance uplift with Blackwell and 50 series, I think we should let the ray tracing die even if it looks good, the performance hit so bad is unacceptable to the point that ray tracing (full path tracing) can be considered just a hype and useless feature.

[@PwewX460]

Path-Tracing w tej grze jest średnio zaimplementowany. Ma bardzo duże wymagania, bez DLSSu nie pograsz płynnie na żadnej karcie, a umówmy się 40FPS w tej grze jest nieprzyjemne> DLSS powoduje spore mydło. Szczerze. wybieram wersję bez RT ale z płynnością., Path-Tracing w tej grze jest często tak zaimplementowany że Albo różnica jest tak 30% albo jest minimalna. a koszt FPS to często ponad 70%. Na dziś uważam że nie jest to gra warta świeczki

[@xanxenon1934]

Ale to dobrze, że dali nam taka opcja. To się przyda gdzieś w przyszłość, jak będziemy mieli 2-3 razy lepsze komputery. Kto pamięta, jak było z Crysis w roku 2007?

[@PwewX460]

@@xanxenon1934 tylko ta gra graficznie nie robi takiego wrażenia jak crysis. Jest dużo ładniejszych gier.

[@Raccon-w5x]

FPS?😂

[@czesiek77PL]

@@PwewX460 No nie wiem, to co tu widac wyglada naprawde dobrze. Podaj jakis przykład ładniejszej gry wg Ciebie

[@AdiiS]

Not true, I play without framgen on my 4090 and the fps is between 60-90 fps completely maxed out with PT. The video is up on my channel. 4090 is the only GPU that can play this game normally, glad I bought it 2 years ago.

[@moravianlion3108]

Those water reflections look like sh-t. And the game runs terribly.

[@RobertZ1973]

Cry us a river toaster king, whatever makes you feel better while you cope. 🤣

[@f1amesoff]

Don't bullshit. The game runs amazingly. kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z2jLk2uMdriMbqM

[@TECHNOARMOUR]

stick to playing gta 5 on ur toaster

[@JarppaGuru]

unreal and ninites or what eva newest thing called. unreal 6 coming. nothing good. game devs not make these its just click and drag. is game play good? LOL is it tomb raider but with dude xD how nice

[@RobertZ1973]

🤤🤡

[@FabrizioBortolussi]

lol