Inertial propulsion - three rotors

I have made an animation, but this is too simple for showing all. Some better modelling is performed here. This solution is predicted to simulate negative gravity based on harnessing inertial forces. The negative gravity would not be generated in form of field as we can imagine right now because it is a product of rotation of heavy weights on which the centrifugal force is acting. The negative gravity will be appearing like inertial mechanic force acting in the center of device on central axis in form of pressure on centrally located collar. The force coming from centrifugal force by use of rotation acting on the spring is in this case not compensated. Centrifugal force will be trying to displace the bottom collar toward the top of the device by use of mechanic forces coming from rotation of the weights, collar is the point where the chains are attached at the bottom (chains are those arms on which are main masses attached in green color). This collar has an ability to move on central axis because it has eight ball bearings placed in proper holes in sliding part underneath this collar. The full system has only one axis of rotation in each generator. During the spring is compressed in upper direction it is encountering on its way the obstacle in form of second collar made on the same central axis. The axis is rounded partially but not completely allowing the bearings in sliding system to stay on their positions. When the central spring is making push on the obstacle it will be pushing on this obstacle by use of its upper edge, and the more it is compressed the more force will be generated in form of pressure on the obstacle. The second upper part of the rotor on which the weights are attached from the top side of the device has not an ability to move, so in assumption the result force will be trying to push the bottom collar by pull of the rotating masses toward the outside of the device by centrifugal force. This as I had said will provide the lift of bottom collar what with application of the spring should in assumption generate the lift of entire system, this is the only move the system will make besides main rotation and compression of the spring. System is consisting of three such a rotor, each have one AC electric motor with electronic speed control. I will try this solution, so I could say clearly if it is working or not. This is not safe device in operation because the rotors should rotate with at least 3000 rpm.

[@blakes8901]

Its been a while since i accidentally stumbled upon the pseudoscience part of youtube. You are attempting to break one of the fundamental laws of physics, which has been found to be true in 100% of tests. Good luck with that, lmao.

[@LepszyNikt]

This civilization doesn't know everything yet and what I am trying to do is harnessing what we don't know right now even when it seems to us that we know something in hundred percent. There is no such a physics which can forbid me to check for eventual discrepancies in it. I am not trying to brake fundamental laws I only want to try something new because I am bored about conventional physics and all what this physics trying to do is not suitable for real human needs especially in space travel. Scientists are not telling truth because they have their duties coming from money of their headmasters.

[@blakes8901]

You sound exactly like i did in early high school when i was still undiagnosed.

[@LepszyNikt]

I know that from the point of view of conventional science I am nut. I can only cooperate with the same nuts as I and I know that. Nobody will help me besides those kind of people.

[@LepszyNikt]

@@blakes8901 We will see about that. For now, I am only capable of doing small experiments and parts but soon I will be able to do welding, machining bigger parts and 3D printing big parts.

[@blakes8901]

You need to see a psychiatrist. I am serious. It keeps going downhill, and eventually you'll be willing to believe anything without substantiated evidence, just because someone used some fancy science mumbo jumbo to "explain it to you". I legitimately used to believe Bedini generators actually existed when i was at my worst. I wouldnt be surprised if you do too. I want you to take a moment to think about the fact that most of the forums that discuss topics like this also lean HEAVILY into religious discussion on the side. I once forgot to respond to a dude's DM on one of those forums for about a week and he freaked out because he thought the government was out to kill him. Please at least talk to a psychiatrist. Good luck.

[@josemathew9087]

Attempt is appropriate till it succeede. Great if it become feasible.

[@LepszyNikt]

For sure.

[@Magi..]

I'm pretty sure this is something people have tried before, it didn't wokr

[@LepszyNikt]

And yet there are several videos on YT where people are trying to do such an invention obtaining some positive results.

[@space_minor3633]

It doesn't work. The loose line becomes tight and resembles a stick. The forces cancel out and only the rotational reaction acts. difficult.

[@LepszyNikt]

Don't you mind you are so pessimistic.

[@space_minor3633]

I'm not being pessimistic, I'm just stating the truth. Saves your time and effort. Please do not take this pessimistically. You shouldn't get used to praise. I think technologists should have discussions based on facts. This device obviously doesn't work. Something more progressive is needed. You didn't show me a video link that doesn't work?

[@space_minor3633]

I may be too decisive. Under certain conditions, an imbalance may occur, resulting in some levitation. I hope you succeed.

[@LepszyNikt]

@@space_minor3633 Talking that something is not working have the same value as talking that it is without making a proper experiment.

[@LepszyNikt]

@@space_minor3633 As I have said in my channel earlier, I am only trying to do an investigation whether inertial propulsion will work because none of rich people or serious scientists in my generation was willing to undertake the topic for finding real solution. If certain people would stop their research before finding the right solution just because someone is not trusting in the invention he is trying to do, we would still be using horses and mules in transport.

[@ofar4452]

I'm confused. What is this supposed to accomplish exactly? The description in the video is unclear. It looks like an over-unity system but I want to undertand what exactly this things purpose is and how it is intended to work. Please provide context - I don't want to make assumptions.

[@LepszyNikt]

You have now an explanation in description.

[@ofar4452]

@@LepszyNikt Thanks! Now that I see what you have written, I am also sceptiacle that this will do what you intend. I would encourage you to build a physical mockup and trial it - experimentation is the best way to learn. That said, I think you will find that your system with the weights will not produce an "anti-gravity effect" because not matter how fast the counterwights spin and press up on your spring, you will always have an equal and opposite reactive force in the form of gravity against your system. I am sorry, but you cannot beat the laws of physics. Nice model and simulation though - thank you for sharing. 😊

[@LepszyNikt]

@@ofar4452 I will take the risk.

[@ofar4452]

@@LepszyNikt I wish you nothing but luck and success in your endeavors - wherever they lead :)

[@LepszyNikt]

@@ofar4452 The force coming from centrifugal force by use of rotation acting on the spring is not compensated.