Infinitely Expandable Randomizer

** UPDATED VERSION HERE: • 4 Small Redstone Stora... **
This is the first of it's kind! An infinitely expandable randomizer!
This tileable design outputs a single random signal amongst however many slices you build.
Big thanks to ‪@JustGlotz‬ and ‪@Kahyxen‬ for their input.
I know ‪@Mumbo‬ likes randomizers... wonder if we can get his attention?
Check us out on the Storage Tech Discord: / discord
World Download: www.mediafire....

[@jmnero4447]

I bet Tango could potentially use this for Decked Out 2.0! Like for randomized events or such.

[@ganglesxiii]

I love how you always seem to find a way to innovate and inspire, and your video production is becoming very refined as well.

[@MoonyInspired]

Ins what 💫

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

Couple things to note: - ***IMPORTANT*** - For EVEN number slices: the clocks need to be synced. So make sure you have wiring that activates them at the same time. - For ODD number slices: the clocks need to have a 2gt offset. This applies to the 1wt version - further testing to come on the spaced out version. - The end slice distribution is a marginally a little low, but if you add an extra slice at each end that doesn't have an output, it should even out. - The 1wt version needs to have a 4gt input, running off a 4gt clock. - The longer the array, the less random outputs you need to generate. String together a couple random output generators if you need to.

[@Rechenmaschine9752]

reeeeeeeeee

[@chiirp]

5 Star narration, great editing!!! Really appreciate that you present other options that do not work and why. I can see this becoming the standard for Randomizers I’m looking forward to the maze generator but am super impressed you stopped when presented with a problem to solve for it first! Give us the Maze! Lol. Will you be premiering The Maze upload?

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

Thanks Cricket!

[@RexxStone]

This is such an awesome idea! Can't wait to see that updated maze too :D

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

Thought about you a lot when making this... maybe an update incoming to some of your games?

[@RexxStone]

@@RaPsCaLLioN1138 Definitely!

[@minlrgo]

@@RexxStone can't wait too

[@Rue3271]

This is awesome, there are two pieces of tech here I have been working with, a selector system that retains memory of selection and a random output generator. Your solution to these is great.

[@R-Error9385]

we be making gambling in minecraft with this one

[@EmdyMC]

Ooh that's neat, was curious about what you were teasing these past few days. Cool stuff as always

[@mrspinn3999]

When you see yourself in one of your subscriptions videos but it's to show how unsatisfactory the other options are out there :'(

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

The reddit post? I'm so sorry... 😞

[@mrspinn3999]

@@RaPsCaLLioN1138 lol it's all good bro. I just thought it was funny that one of my videos came up when you searched for randomizers. Amazing work on this one!

[@MoonyInspired]

This is very interesting actually... amazingly compact too! You've managed to surprise yet again.

[@whitestonejazz]

looks great! crashing signals was clever

[@goosetronaut4331]

what if you did one of the armor stand randomizers and took the output as a serial string of bits and then decoded those bits into a single output? you wouldn’t need an infinitely expanding design either as the more bits you add, it is exponential in the number of potential outputs and the cost to build it instead of being linear would be logarithmic. that being said though, i love your design, i already have a few ideas of where i wanna use it, fantastic job! edit: so after going in and trying it, turns out, it's still linear, because you still need to build a slice for each new output of the decoder, so it would still be the same if not more expensive than this design, so props to rapscallion, this really is a fantastic design :)

[@clausschuchmann118]

Gotta love the Glotz cameo

[@dahgo64]

Noise! I can already picture a couple of uses for this

[@secret6365]

Using a few 50/50 randomisers you could treat their output as a binary number and convert that into a single number

[@randomcubestuff3426]

woah that's pretty smart

[@bobdagranny7431]

This is gonna be so useful!

[@AgentEm34]

Awesome work Raps!

[@ryanthescion]

LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

[@ryanthescion]

i personally have no use case in mind for this for me personally but i'll try to think of something

[@_KK]

I recently worked on minesweeper and had a similar problem, needed random cell coordinates to plant a mine at the start of the game. Here is my solution: just used classical RNG with droppers, put 1 unstackable and 1 stackable item inside, this way it will output ether 1 or 0, 50% chance each. Then I stacked such generators corresponding to maximum value of coordinates, I had 64x64 field of cells, so I needed 6 such randomizers for each coordinate. This way it will output random binary number from 0 to 63, obviously can be made for any range of outputs.

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

Sounds big and laggy.

[@_KK]

@@RaPsCaLLioN1138 Nah for 4 bit numbers it will be like 20 blocks

[@charliebewsey6872]

Even if you were only making a smaller randomiser with 8 outputs for example, this would be superior to existing designs because of its integrity and potential of expansion! I don't think you'll find me building any randomiser other than this in future (unless, of course, this is improved upon ;) )

[@badass3000]

very cool! thanks for sharing!

[@korin9517]

Very cool bro

[@bottlewisp]

oh neat, a comparator signal can be blocked by a pulse as short as an observer pulse. the more ya know :)

[@JustGlotz]

Hmm

[@Firigion]

Fantastic concept! Can you easily control the frequency of the output? Or do you need to pass this putput through a gate of some sort to normalize it in time?

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

Changing the number of non-stackables in the random output generators should do it. Or chain together a couple to slow down even more.

[@pixelplanet142]

based

[@xilef6538]

Nice edits Love it

[@techly3939]

noice

[@Nukelawe]

The check for uniformity seems experimental. Have you tried confirming this by deriving the distribution knowing the exact properties of the randomizers responsible for sending the pulses?

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

I have not.

[@ItsCon_]

is there a tutorial on how to make this, super great concept and its exactly what i need, but not sure how the random generators work on both sides of the machine, any help would be greatly appreciated

[@juulbaardmans]

Glotz told me to comment (: also, nice vid

[@SystemofEleven]

I don't understand how the timer connects up, and I don't recognize the timer you used. It went by really fast, and even going frame-by-frame isn't clearing it up enough. Do you have a video explaining that?

[@Kacperkkl]

Where I can found your resourcepack?

[@Mr.bakedbean]

Does it work in bedrock?

[@conspicuouspigeons]

Does it work on bedrock? (Chain)

[@jmnero4447]

Question, would it be possible to request only one random output at a time from this particular contraption?

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

yes and no... because the time to deliver a random signal is also random, it's not the best setup for for it. however, I do have a new system that is call based that can do what you describe.

[@jmnero4447]

@@RaPsCaLLioN1138 oh wow such a hastily reply, didn't expect it so quick! Hmmm. Yeah that does make sense because of the way it is set up. A call based one? That would actually be perfect instead of me having to use the randomizer in this video to create data storage then have to read it over a period of time. The randomizer would just create the required data right then. This would save on a heck of a lot of space and work and troubleshooting on why it ain't working. 🤣

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

@@jmnero4447 hit me up on discord

[@jmnero4447]

@@RaPsCaLLioN1138 DM sent

[@vltir]

Smart idea for randomization. Very nice.

[@LavenderLeBgDu93]

Does it work on bedrock ?

[@CommandLeo]

Great video! -It would have been nice to mention the distribution of the outputs though-

[@RaPsCaLLioN1138]

Are you talking about something other than this? kzbin.info/www/bejne/iGLTemyve6uHiKM

[@CommandLeo]

@@RaPsCaLLioN1138 I don't know how I missed it 😳

[@magnusseidelindam]

I could make a solution that works as long as the number of outputs align with multiples of the first sixteen prime numbers. Although my solution would admittedly be a lot more cumbersome.

[@NotLuaYT]

OMG IM LOOKING FOR THIS THANK YOU