How Bamboo Towers in Africa Produce Free Water

In this issue you will see a unique invention that produces water.
Subscribe to our channel! bit.ly/3XjayMl
This is the south of Ethiopia, the village of the Dorze people. And this is Warka Water Tower. This is not a ritual building, although in its significance it could become one. Because it is a tower that gives the village endless, clean water and, most importantly, is absolutely free. It's not a matter of mere convenience. In villages like this (actually, there are millions of such settlements in Africa), girls and women fetch water. And on average, it takes an unimaginable 6 hours a day. Therefore, Warka Water Tower is a real savior. How does this tower work and how does it change people's lives for the better? You will learn about everything in this video!
#inventions #water #most #tehnology
If you are the author of the materials or the copyright owner of it, but your authorship was not indicated or you object to its use, please contact me: [e-mail]
Don’t miss next videos: Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications
Production Music courtesy of Epidemic Sound www.epidemicsound.com/

[@carolrocky9803]

This is a great invention, I know other countrys and areas could benefit greatly from this, can yours? Can we donate and be sure it is used Only for the materials for making a Wonka Tower?"

[@lucasahumada6913]

It’s like the water collectors in dune

[@1970brenz]

Omigosh this is wonderful! So encouraging and what a blessing to see how clean, cheap and effective the system is. And amazing for those people to have water security, reduce their workload and stress of searching for water supplies.

[@kimberleypex]

Much respect ! Good idea . So much beautiful inspiration in difficult times.

[@allanfahrenhorst-jones6118]

Brilliant work. Good to see someone caring. If only the governments would put in the time and effort to help their citizens. Alas they're all about themselves. I'm in Australia and it's people are always the ones who suffer.

[@davidredfern836]

Basic structure providing life giving water. I hope it catches on

[@damongraham1398]

Is there a direct correlation between the size of a Warka Water Tower and the amount of water?

[@petepete66]

Perfekt 🔥🔥🔥✌️😜👍🔥🔥🔥🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀

[@paolomesseca8679]

Beatyful but how it works in different climate conditions (dry/humid with strong winds etc.) ?

[@carolinegray7510]

It would be SO great if you showed HOW the towers were built.

[@hanavesela5884]

It’s probably proprietary technology or something like that.

[@King-Ghidora]

You just have to look up, investigate in the internet about Warka water towers. The problem is not technological, but rather a matter of funding. I have been reading about Warka for years and waiting for plans or tower kits, but it seems that the concept still needs to be proven in order to have it commercially available. Backers still need to be convinced. Apparently people have a tendency to trust something technological, like an atmospheric water generator, than something simple like the warka tower.

[@abundantharmony]

OR, you could Google it. As if you plan on building them...

[@alexiabent4142]

Yes please show how ut operates...on what principles....tc

[@bagdat3535]

If we go up higher with extending the Warka Tower we will collect even more water.

[@tamihoffnung301]

💚💚💚

[@Chuy.1.0]

How they gonna produce the water if they got no water 💀

[@myname5068]

Not true, Druz is a religion you mentioned at the beginning and they are not Druz, Druz or derzi is a closed religion exist only in few places like Lebanon, Jordan, Syria. Moreover they are not what mentioned on Google lool it is closed relegion so they don't tell you what you want to know, nice documantery I like it.

[@mazocco]

Ive seen enough of these to expect them to only be viable if they break the laws of thermodynamics or if it is so humid that it would be raining already. Better wait to see them work in practice before believing in their architects claims.

[@danielking7988]

Respectfully, your comment does not help me understand why these devices won't work. I would be grateful if you could briefly explain which physical laws are violated, and how you have concluded that. If there is a legitimate reason why this tech won't work, I'm sure many people would like to discuss the issues openly so alternative solutions can be created.

[@mazocco]

@@danielking7988 if i would make a complete answer to you we would have to make some calculations that i am not willing to go though right now, but i will put it all in simpler terms. 1- You would need to remove some large amounts of energy from the water in order to make it condensate in a significant flow, like what air conditioners do. Now notice how much energy they spend and how much water flows out of it. It is REALLY inefficient. 2- considering how little amounts of water air humidity is capable of holding (it is indeed tiny), you would need a HUGE volume of air with considerably high relative humidity to extract even a tiny bit of liquid. That would almost certainly demand an active air flow, with fans, like air conditioners again. And still, high humidity is a must. If otherwise, all the potential water will be more easily evaporating than condensing, which means not a single droplet produced this way. So, we may conclude that what we are seeking to accomplish this task is just an air conditioner in a sufficiently humid environment, which still does this job very, VERY poorly. Digging wells, collecting rain and all the now "traditional" stuff we do is really far ahead in terms of viability, especially in dry places that need hem. Unless, of course, the proponents of this new tech somehow prove otherwise.

[@mazocco]

@@danielking7988 there is a channel that usually debunks these stuff, math included. Seach for thunderf00t if you are interested. I didnt find the specific video i wanted to show you because there are many of them debunking the same concept of "water from air" but in many different ways and techs. It is a very nice science-ish channel,, i recommend.

[@seankingwell3692]

thermodynamics changes with changes of proportional atmospheric gases as well as moisture. In what ways does one "break the law" of physics? With lightning maintaining oxygen hydrogen water balance, how does one break this "law" that changes depending on proportional gases? Their levels effect how temperature feels colder or hotter then the mercury can tell they also alter wetness and dryness with increases and drops in temperature outside normal rates of condensation, dew point, cloud burst, and threshold between wet and dry most marked by Arsenic. Nitrogen, fluoride, and Formaldehyde makes the clouds want to rain as soon as there is less light or a temp drop or drop in pressure just from going over a mountain. Ground plants and medicine plants soak these gases up when the ground is saturated in cold weather. A forest fire will produce excess arsenic so when its warm it does not rain and when it does its all at once. With happening, we have huge groups of clouds not bursting collecting together until they hit mountains anywhere in the world and produce all these "atmospheric rivers" these uneducated Babylonians keep babbling about with a term meant to mystify what should be a simple understanding of this process. Different plants react to different levels of proportional gases and moisture levels, we have our senses plus the plants reactions to confirm changes in the atmosphere. Thermodynamics literally changes throughout the year. In high humidity, best breathing rate is 4 down the lung 3 through the nose so you take less heat to the head more nitrogen below nitrogen is less PPM in the heat, when its -20 and colder you have to breath 3 down the lungs and 4 through the nose, lung won't take on too much nitrogen which is overabundant at ground level at -20 and up in the mountains and low pressure. This is what the troops in India understand, that which the Chinese communist CCP troops could not. So, why and how would thermodynamics be forever set in stone when arsenic evaporates in the summer and saturates into the soil with rain and snow in winter? When nitrogen behavior is easily overridden when there is too much arsenic not enough rain and if it were too much nitrogen and not enough arsenic it would rain as soon as the sun went down or it got shady out every day without fail. Better wait to learn and understand how chemistry and physics work together in atmospherics. They work because of their design, the sacred geometry in relation to creation explains it just fine one just needs to word it in their preferred language. An appointed experts opinion is not the same as you forming your own understanding. God shows us doors, we must go through them on our own will.

[@seankingwell3692]

trees and composting are also much more practical and will restore ground springs which disappear without the ground being covered and reappear all over the world when trees are planted back.

[@just.jose.youtube]

This world is sick and we must change it! Think about it: the disadvantage of such an incredible and positive invention is that no one can make it "dirty" with money and get rich! 🤦‍♂️ (I bet there's still indirect ways of doing it...)

[@james3876]

More accurately phrased, there's little personal evolutionary advantage or benefit to using up one's own life energy to build these things. The locals don't do anything for anyone else, if they did they would have an account of the benefits they've provided to others(money is usually used for this purpose) which they could trade with for this tech. Money is an accounting system for exchanged value, it's a good thing

[@just.jose.youtube]

@@james3876 if one sees money as the only "personal evolutionary advantage or benefit", or a way for it, that exists, you're right! I admit I took the "exaggerated way" with my comment. But I still have a hard time finding money good for anything. I guess it's what people do with something that makes such something good or bad, but still... Money is also the reason why we still dont have a cure for a lot of diseases, for example. Pharmaceuticals (who fund most research and studies) get richer if they find chronic treatments over actually finding the cure for a disease. If research team A, from University X, is getting closer to a cure, their funding gets cut off! People are suffering and DYING because of other's greediness. (War is the same thing, etc, etc...)

[@james3876]

​@@just.jose.youtube I agree. It's not perfect, and balancing out the economic system to incentivize beneficial behavior is a difficult, never ending process for a machine that is constantly throwing itself out of desired alignment. Maybe in our life times some of the commonly abused excesses can be stopped. I'm hopeful with the advent of improved communication technology that allows knowledgeable people to make others aware of them. Cheers

[@just.jose.youtube]

@@james3876 thanks for your kind, positive answer! 🙏 Cheers!

[@seankingwell3692]

even better, tree planting and building compost is best way to improve hydrology of soil aquifers and even weather.