Inside the Bf-109

[@BluePawPrint]

Play Conflict of Nations con.onelink.me/kZW6/4exvww9d and get 13,000 gold and 1 month of premium subscription for free.

[@pyeitme508]

Meh

[@ChipoMpatane]

What

[@bolech5221]

No ever since that god awful kaiten torpedo sponsorship i have lose the enthusiasm towards these videos

[@Jack-zw5qn]

⁠@@bolech5221no! You LOVE betterhelp! licensed therapists? What the hell are those?

[@Mari_Ant-l7c]

another great video pal

[@paulpogba1728]

19:13 - “don’t want to hit my head on the gunsight so i better expose this giant metal rod instead”

[@skywarp2180]

LoL on a crash landing the pilot might be killed as Ayrton Senna

[@Terminator._]

"DAMN!" (In German) -German pilot after retracting his sight. 1942

[@AL-RCjunkie]

Like a "Final Destination" scenario 60 years before the movies were released.

[@N0die]

ja genau und keine Angst, oder sich darüber beschweren!

[@andreastimper9848]

contrary to what the video claimed, the gunsight was not removable in fg.likght and switching it over to the side was normal landing procedure, not only during an emergency.

[@bonaconlodoset9264]

Blue paw print is an instant click

[@Cheesetaxlord3]

You know we all agree

[@Battlemode-l9p]

yes

[@stefhuijs5609]

Fr

[@ghiffaryorlin2341]

fr

[@Driedecker_Aviation]

Agreed!

[@harpomarx7777]

I understand that the hinge on the canopy was rather fragile and pilots were warned not to let it flop open, but to gently lower it into the open position to prevent springing the hinge. It was rather heavy and could easily slip from the pilot's grasp when doing so. I also understand that the 109 was developed from an aircraft with fixed landing gear, which is why the retractable gear mechanism and pivot had to be built into the fuselage rather than the thinner wings. That is why the gear was narrow and splayed outward to try to get it as wide as possible. Superb video, as always!

[@kaycey7361]

It was based on a world speed record-breaking Messerschmitt aircraft. The plane was slick and caused the italians to lose the title.

[@Xubor]

I think this kind of landing gear was used to make the plane more lightweight and to allow taking off the wings while being on the ground.

[@rzr2ffe325]

It was also from the Nazi era, so technically there should be a swastika on the tail. Otherwise looked period correct though.

[@liquidator3828]

amazing as always, please do FW 190.

[@ARTUROHOTT]

Yes

[@77rommel]

The Butcher Bird

[@rzr2ffe325]

But put a swastika on the tail this time! For aesthetic reasons only (we know the Luftwaffe didn’t orchestrate the Holocaust)

[@asator0505]

@@rzr2ffe325 jeez, what's you obsession with wanting to see swastikas

[@dotista2008]

@@rzr2ffe325 about swastikas, why the Fw 190 did not have that symbol ?

[@shadowkiller_9303]

Truly one of the best early ww2 planes to ever be created

[@KusaNagi-k5g]

agreed! while maybe not as maneuverable as spitfire or zeroes, it pack punch of 20mm guns and also the true power is on it's engine, be able to do negative g maneuver is hell a lot advantages against it's adversaries.

[@armchairgeneralissimo]

Effective, easy to produce on mass, was room for improvements to be made to keep it relevent for the entire war.

[@katekarin3838]

one of the best looking fighter too. The camos also look good especially the iconic yellow nose and the spiral spinner for the 109s.

[@ociee117]

​@armchairgeneralissimo that's what I was gonna say too. It was used for the entire war and was never really catastrophically outclassed by anything the allies had. People jerk off to the Tiger and Panthers but they broke constantly. The 109 was the true Wunderwaffe.

[@armchairgeneralissimo]

@@ociee117 I'm with you on that, on the ground the ones doing the heavy lifting were the Stugs and Panzer III/IV.

[@AFriendlyTheo]

I appreciate the usage of both metric and imperial measurements!

[@Sacto1654]

It should be noted that Bf 109G-6 pilots often complained about the poor field of vision with the framed canopy. That was the reason why post G-6, the Bf 109G-10 and newer models got the new _Erla Haube_ canopy, which had a vastly superior field of vision. (NOTE: the _Erla Haube_ canopy was often called "Galland Hood" by post-World War II British aviation writers.) However, the biggest weakness of the Bf 109G-6 was the fact its top speed was only 386 mph with the DB 605A engine. That lower top speed made it particularly vulnerable the P-51B/C/D/K models, the P-47D, and the Spitfire Mk. VIII and later models. P-51 pilots took full advantage of the Bf 109G-6's lower top speed limitation, and as such by the summer of 1944 had pretty much wiped out the most experienced fighter pilots in the _Luftwaffe_ .

[@Tiberius_I]

Thanks, I'd been reading about the 109 since the 1970's, and I never heard about the Erla Haube Canopy. The 109's problem was it was obsolescent and the luftwaffe should have replaced it by 1942 at the latest, but they couldn't. And not even their other fighter, Fw-190, could do what the 109 could do: attack the enemy Jabos at altitudes over 25,000 feet. But besides being outdated, the 109 had other huge problems. Excessively short range in action was one, and the narrow landing gear was another. The narrow landing gear caused problems for pilots to the very end. With the massive engine torque in a light and small airframe, the109 had a tendency to wing over and crash on landing and take-off. The Germans lost more Bf-109's to accidents, than to enemy action.

[@Sacto1654]

@@Tiberius_I I think had the _Luftwaffe_ been a bit smarter, they should have prioritized developing the Junkers Jumo 213 engine specifically for an higher-performing version of the Fw 190 *MUCH* earlier. They should have gotten the Fw 190D series into service at least one year earlier, and the much higher top speed and altitude performance of the Fw 190D-9, had it been available one year earlier, could have made it far more difficult for the Allies to gain air superiority over Germany.

[@Tiberius_I]

@@Sacto1654 All that's true, no doubt! The men who led the luftwaffe were in general, highly competent if not brilliant leaders, fliers and engineers (with the notable exception of Herman Goerring himself). Men like Field Marshall Erhard Milch, armaments minister Albert Speer, and the remarkable pre-war visionary Gen. Walther Weaver, gave their all to running the luftwaffe, but in the end none of it was enough - too many external and internal factors proved impossible for them to overcome. Shortages of aircraft and fuel, a cumbersome internal bureaucracy, Hitler's constant meddling, and eventually allied strategic bombing, proved to be a fatal stew that by 1945, had all but wiped out the luftwaffe's combat power.

[@elpatolucas22]

​@@Sacto1654ahora son todos mas inteligentes 😂...es muy fácil serlo con la historia escrita como vos ahora.

[@laszu7137]

@@Sacto1654 As I understand it the Fw-190C could have provided simmilar performance as the Dora eventually did, just in mid '43. But the whole C program was scrapped due to political intrigues in the RLM.

[@nonbigbrain9662]

I can only imagine how much time and effort you guys have to put in for this level of work

[@acQ_pi]

This is one of my favorite educational videos on KZbin

[@rzr2ffe325]

The tail is a little revisionist (no swastika), but otherwise a solid reconstruction

[@blizzardogisitc]

When you think about it, his sound is very similar to Yarnhub

[@kalebgonzales4009]

Dude, I stopped work for this. Hope you can get into ships as well. Love your content man!

[@XNSinaCTYFNCTURNLBRDS]

This channel has so much potential, I dont even want to start naming all the vehicles i want to see featured on here

[@oskart4237]

absolutely the best video of BF109 functions.. thanks

[@anwitadhikari8424]

I can say I was here when this amazing video had less than 50 views!

[@Bleihagel]

50K yet xD

[@nomad8723]

Outstanding work. I really appreciate how high quality, factual and informative films like this are available for free, as opposed to the slop that you had 15 years ago on cable.

[@rzr2ffe325]

One detail missing is the lack of swastika on the tail. (This plane comes from the Nazi era)

[@S1su]

One of the best channels on KZbin! 👏

[@AL-RCjunkie]

Immediately pummeled the play button, once this popped up in my notifications. You didn't disappoint! Another really well done video, David! Got a kick out of the subtle hints on the 3 blades of the prop. Hope to see a comprehensive WWII aircraft Playlist on this channel one day. These videos are so well done. 👍

[@jonathansteadman7935]

Not only do we have the excellent Yarnhub, we have blue paw print. I'm just about to start a 109 kit, all be it a K variant in 1/32. This will add to the build and one of the options has the same camouflage as the one on this inspiring film. I know I say it often, but the quality of the narration (so sick of AI) to the artwork and animation just seems to just get better and better. Wonderful stuff. Thanks to all involved for the quality put into your work 👍

[@vincent9429]

Bf109,FW190,Yak 3 and Spitfire most beautiful plane of ww2.

[@wesleyheath4524]

Imma need u to add the 'stang and then I can fully 100% agree

[@wesleyheath4524]

But that yak 3 can burn in hell when it comes to warthunder, and I have a certain distaste for spitfires as well.... Zeros can get wrecked too

[@vincent9429]

@@wesleyheath4524 Pilot of Normandie Niemen troupe hunter to be Said Yak3 is best plane .

[@wesleyheath4524]

@@vincent9429 if warthunder planes behave anything like their real life counterparts I believe it they are the one plane I haven't figured out a counter for yet

[@vincent9429]

@@wesleyheath4524 I haven't play to war thunder and i think is not true this plane have good performe but i talk about aesthic .P51 is beautiful plane to F4U is not bad .

[@Rob.DB.]

Love the breakdown of the cockpit! Though i have no flight training at all, I feel like i could actually take off and fly this nearly 100 year old design... If i could fit my fadazz inside it ! Thank you for an excellently entertaining & educational video

[@Cah1r096]

would like to see the mosquito next!

[@KimNaasty]

My mind during the whole video: "Now I'm feelin' so fly like a G6"

[@vornamenachname989]

Really interesting video, thank you! Small nitpick, the safety warning under the hood of the plane reads "Vorsicht beim Öffnen" (Careful when opening) "Kühter ist im Haubenteit eingebaut" but it should read "Kühler ist im Haubenteil eingebaut" (Cooling intake is built into this part of the hood). The L and the T look really similar though, so that's probably the reason for this error. Doesn't take away anything from the informative qualities of this video though!

[@45100]

I must say two things. One, I love these videos. Two, I use them to fall asleep. Not that they are boring. Havens forbid. But it is the sound of the narrator's voice that is... soothing I'd say.

[@wifthebasch1329]

I like how you gave it the colours and markings of Franz Stigler, as he had them during the Stigler-Brown-Incident. Could we be getting a remake of that?👀

[@rzr2ffe325]

I found the lack of a swastika distracting and revisionist however

[@wifthebasch1329]

@@rzr2ffe325 I'm pretty sure they just did that, because KZbin doesn't like that, I don't think they did that because they wanted to

[@Kettleman1.0]

The gear on 109s was connected to the fuselage so it's wings could be removed and it could still be on its wheels, which is the only relativley unknown fact I know about the 109

[@nigellawson8610]

One would close to 250 yard or less to get the full benefit of Bf 109G6’s rather light armament. As Erich Hartmann, Germany’s top ace of World War Two, noted, the best tactic to bring down an enemy aircraft was to dive behind it and pull up in its blind spot before opening fire. He further noted that it was best to wait until the enemy aircraft filled one’s windshield before delivering the fatal burst. Hartmann was also was of the opinion that engaging the enemy in a dogfight was pointless because it sacrificed the vital element of surprise. In other words, to become a successful ace one had to use the element of surprise to dive on the enemy out of the sun and pull up behind him before proceeding to blast him out the air, which on the surface seems hardly sporting. Once that task was completed, a smart fighter pilot would then climb away and reassess the overall tactical situation before repeating the process again. Hartmann referred to this tactic as having a coffee break. In short, an aspiring ace would always try to shoot his enemy in the back, thereby minimizing the danger to himself.

[@heatherc1893]

this guy is just yarn hub disguised right bc he did a video on a kamikaze submarine then yarn hub did and they sound very similar

[@BluePawPrint]

yes we're the same team behind both channels

[@vitman2409]

This is great. I'd also like to see the more advanced FW-190 on the channel. Not only was it more advance, it's a looker as well and was a proper big fighter, a true workhorse.

[@ImRandomDude]

this channel is truly amazing.

[@igna0101]

I've been waiting for this ❤

[@AgricultureTechUS]

The editing and pacing were flawless. Great video!

[@ericsacco7406]

Masterpiece video!!! KEEP THEM COMMING!!!! SOOO GOOD~!

[@FarFromHome12]

Evidence of the genius of innovation, the commitment of German engineers. Powerful engines, nimble frames, powerful weapons, creating an aircraft that was too perfect in its era😉

[@giulianomarco]

Very interesting, with just the right amount of detail. 😁👍

[@rzr2ffe325]

Not enough detail. You’ll notice the swastika is missing because history offends people and modern politics. So it’s basically choosing monetization over historical accuracy because of KZbin’s stupid rules. Even though if you look at old photographs you’ll see swastikas painted on the tail. It’s a form revisionism.

[@FlyingSlovene]

Man I truly love this channel!

[@marckyle5895]

The part that started at 9:53 and ended at 10:45 looked more realistic than Masters of the Air's did.

[@hmmmnmnmnm]

What a well-researched series. I could watch an episode for every interesting piece of military hardware.

[@kephas7772]

Late-stage Bf 109G5/6 - 2 x MG 131 13 mm machine guns on top of cowling, 300 party ammunition, 1 MG 151/20 20mm machine gun on engine shaft, 200 ammunition... Daimler-Bents DB 605A Water-Cooled 12-cylinder reverse V-engine, 1475 horsepower (basic without MW50)...

[@eventfulnonsense]

The hollow inverted engine design to accomodate the cannon are just amazing.

[@dipomchemistry.1218]

Atomic scale animation creation. Oh I just closed my lab and watching this lovely documentary... ❤

[@pyeitme508]

Amazing 😍, wish for Inside US M1 Abrams (M1A1 model from 1990-91 Gulf War) main battle tank in the future 🥺

[@JonHedberg]

An amazing aircraft despite its issues. All planes had issues to overcome, just take a look at the Corsair's early models. No dispute that the 109 was one of the best. 1. Most produced fighter in history.. more than 33,000 built 2. Most enemy planes destroyed.. FW-190 is number 2 on that list and it doesn't even have half as many.. 3. Fought successfully in 3 different wars.... Spanish Civil War, WWII, and the 1948 Israeli war. 4. The top scoring fighter pilots flew it... Hartman, Barkhorn, Raul, Galland, Moulders....etc.. 5. Stayed in active service until the 1960's... Spanish Airforce..etc. 6. Everyone wanted it.. Finish Airforce, Chec Airforce, Israeli Airforce...etc. 7. It was an excellent design that stayed relevant throughout WWII and after.. Were there better performing fighters? Yes, but none achieved what the 109 did..

[@rahmin100]

Your videos are literally my favorite and the best. Never stop making these!!

[@65goldenone]

Please do the B-29 Superfortress next. This channel would actually be able to do that aircraft justice within a sub-30 minute timespan.

[@kryts27]

The supercharge impeller system is now used (modified of course) in many cars. Many modern combustion reciprical piston engines use Bf109 technology, like supercharger and direct injection, remarkable for an 80 year old aircraft. This variable supercharger on the Bf109 (allowing for thinner air at altitude) was an advantage in climbing and diving over the Supermarine Spitfire (which also had a supercharger) but was a carburettor rather than direct injection technology of the Bf109, which was a advantage when diving as there was no engine cut-out when the petrol rose in the carburettor bowl at negative G-force dives of the Spitfire. In defence of the Spitfire, it turned more tightly than the Bf109 in a dogfight, partly due to it's elliptical wing design.

[@jaydenkerr912]

These videos are incredibly well made. The bf 109 is my favourite airplane ever and watching this video was really interesting.

[@BluePawPrint]

Thank you for the support!

[@andymustangflyer1528]

Excellent CGI with high-quality and production-grade renderings. Thank you!

[@MrBBaron]

Iconic plane of WW2 with Very well done graphics and description of parts.

[@jupiter1401]

Estava ansioso para ver mais um vídeo do canal ! 👍🇧🇷

[@phlashtheband4939]

Absolutely love your video's. Lots of very clear information! I can't imagine how long it takes to create one of these, well done!

[@mickmuzzmkmz1628]

Excellent video!👌👍 One thing I would have liked to have seen is the information about the inertia engine starter, (unless you have already covered this in a previous video). Love your content!!!🤩🤗😍

[@Kirq]

Quality of these vids is stuning.

[@MarxMin]

I absolutely love your animations and can't get enough I only wish you could crank them out faster! Keep up the amazing work! 👍

[@RivetGardener]

This is a top notch class A video without a doubt! Wow, the info and graphics you supply to tell the story are amazing. Thank you for that. I always wondered about that silly, right folding-open square canopy lid. Didn't it make jumping out of the plane dangerous? Seems to me an engineer's design rather than a pilot's design.

[@AlexeiTolpygo]

Great explanations and beautiful graphics, thank you!

[@Spikeydelic]

The mighty Blue Paw Print uploaded MY FAVORITE ww2 plane!!! You are amazing!!

[@FAMÍLIA600-l2i]

Sensational as always!Congratulations!The best!Porto Alegre / RS - Brazil.

[@danatubos2648]

so many details, wow, and saying this as an german. thanks for this documentary vid. have a good time

[@almighurt3347]

I was waiting for this video for so long, thank you!

[@stubi1103]

Excelent work Sir, thank you for sharing and greetings from Germany... 👌👌

[@skywarp2180]

The DCS and IL-2 CLoD/GB years taught me a lot about the Bf109 procedures

[@rzr2ffe325]

So the Russian developers for both DCS and IL2 don’t believe in freedom of speech or historical accuracy. So the German planes don’t come with a swastika by default. It requires a third party mod/skin to get that historical marking for maximum immersion. But it’s not compatible with online multiplayer because that is not the default for the game

[@atunaco]

I like the accent or the IA translator it is quite natural, and seems as if an english speaker was speaking spanish. This solves the problem of having to chose among the different spanish language dialects. The only problem is that it sometimes uses the "preterito perfecto simple" tense when the correct form would be the "preterito imperfecto" tense.

[@twickersruss]

That was a great insight into the details of this sinister but effective adversary-

[@harpiaamazon]

Amazing! As always. Please continue with this project for a long time!

[@rezariyazi8450]

Hi David thank you a lot for post videos they really help and also millions of thanks for share these information please continue and that would grateful if you made a video about Stuka .

[@msredfox]

Another fantastic video! Id love to see something like the inside of a Char B1 Bis tank, itd be pretty awesome to see a 3d render of one of those beasts.

[@Nem0ful]

I haven't watched it yet but I already think it's a great video, like all the other videos on the channel

[@арахисовое_масло]

love your videos, and this new channel

[@ChristopherGriffin-ee2ol]

Funfact: Did you know that a variety of the BF-109 had two fuelsolauges in one aircraft? Known as the BF-109 Zwilling or BF-109Z, it had 2 fuelsolauges, 2 inverted V-12 engines, 2 propellers, 4 main gear legs, 2 tail gear, 12 guns between the variants, the BF-109Z was similar to the F-81 twin Mustang fighter, but unlike the F-81, the BF-109Z was never built (both the BF-109Z and the F-81 Twin Mustang are in the game War Thunder)

[@mbryson2899]

Check out the HE-111Z-1. Two fuselages, _five_ engines.

[@ChristopherGriffin-ee2ol]

@@mbryson2899 wut?

[@mbryson2899]

@@ChristopherGriffin-ee2ol Google HE-111Z and select Images. It was actually an operational aircraft.

[@ritxises9542]

variety as such no....experimental prototypes...they did not go beyond that phase

[@Rusty0621]

This is amazing work once again! Truly fascinating and so well researched. Please do the Spitfire!

[@stonedtowel]

I’m extremely excited for German and Russian tanks, I have a feeling they are coming soon. Thanks again for such high quality content, the background music, the editing, and the Morgan freeman tier narration. Sheer excellence.

[@mountfujieagle]

Brilliant as always. all your video works are simply state of the art. thank you.

[@nhelvincillocca9068]

al finnnn....esperaba este video con ansias...no hay muchos canales que te muestren el 109 de manera real, solo hablan de cosas externas...gracias yarn ❤pd: podrias sacar un video del zero plis

[@polarking888]

That compact engine front is really astonishing.

[@rolandhunter]

"Me 109 was hard/dangerous plane to take off." - The standard takeoff procedure for 109 was to use rudder to keep the plane straight. There was basically to ways to take off the plane. Either you throttled up fairly fast and gave full right rudder, easing it off as speed increased, or you throttled up slowly so there was minimal torque effect. In practise that was similar to anybody who had flown other types before and it took usually just one flight to know how to do it. The myth that there was something hard in taking off in 109 stems mostly from highly exaggerated claims - or the fact that for new pilots converting to 109 from various trainers had not flown such highly powerful aircraft before. With proper teaching - no problems. In Germany that was rare thing in the last years of war though. The Finnish Air Force chief instructor colonel Väinö Pokela told, that one of his key points in teaching new pilots to 109s was to instruct them very carefully - and told them to forget any horror stories they've been told. He said, that many pilots were already scared from the horror stories other pilots and non pilots had been telling, and after showing how easy 109 was to handle there was seldom any problems. - Colonel Pokela also told that most 109 crashed he had seen resulted because the pilot had forgotten to lock the tailwheel before applying takeoff power. If that happened then the pilot couldn't keep the plane straight when accelerating. Take notice that you need to push rudder in all other planes as well - for example Spitfire requires similarly full right pedal while accelerating. - Torque can indeed send a plane off the runway during a takeoff, especially if there's a crosswind to start it off. But 109 is no different from a P-40 or a Spitfire in this situation. The bad reputation most likely comes from pilots flying it for the first and perhaps only time, and that the veteran pilot would instinctively make the adjustments needed to keep it straight while rolling on the ground. "109s were so difficult to take off and land that half the 109s lost in the war were lost to take off and landing accidents." - 5 % of the 109's were lost in take off/landing accidents. "11,000 of the 33,000 built were destroyed during takeoff and landing accidents - one third of its combat potential!" (direct quote) "Me-109 had an astonishing 11,000 takeoff/landing accidents resulting in destruction of the a/c! That number represents roughly one-third of the approximately 33,000 such a/c built by Germany." (usual internet claim) - Source: FLIGHT JOURNAL magazine - The magazine has it wrong or has misintepretated the numbers. Luftwaffe lost about 1500 Me-109's in landing gear failures. Note that German loss reports often lump destroyed and damaged (10 to 60% damaged) together. It was also a standard practise to rebuild even heavily damaged airframes. While rebuilding/refurnishing these planes were also upgraded to the latest standards and latest equipment. This means that large proportion of these damaged/destroyed planes were not complete losses, but returned to squadron service. "The specific problem with the Bf 109 was the very narrow / weak undercarriage track." - Narrow landing gear was not that uncommon at the time - all biplanes also had narrow landing gear. Me 109's undercarriage was connected to the fuselage rather than the wings. This had several reasons. Most importantly the wings were easily and quickly changed if needed, without special preparations or tools. Wings were also one single structure, which made it possible to make them very strong. Because this the plane needed some care when operating. The claim that the narrow undercarriage was a problem is a myth, though. In comparison the undercarriage of Supermarine Spitfire was even narrower - it had its own share of problems from this. Imagine what it was to takeoff and land the Spitfire's carrier version to carriers for example? Especially later marks of Spitfire with enormous amount of installed power were quite a handful to operate. But that is conveniently usually ignored. - The width of undercarriage in Me 109 E is 1,97 meters; 109 G 2,06 meters and 109 K 2,1 meters. However - Spitifre's undercarriage width was 1,68 meters. - The real problem was the center of gravity behind the undercarriage. This made it possible to brake unusually hard in landings, but it also required the pilot to keep the plane straight in takeoff and landing. Because this it was easier for a small sideswing to develop into a groundloop or the plane might drift off the runway, if the pilot was not awake. Of course, if the tailwheel was not locked, the tendency would be pronounced and more difficult to counter. As with any plane. - Contrary to the popular myth, the landing gear could take the plane 'dropping' in from about 8-10 feet. "The 109 was flown down to the runway at relatively high speed and "wheel" landed: it was to make sure the leading edge slats did not deploy. Because of the high speed at touchdown, there was more time for something to go wrong during the rollout, and it often did." - Now that is some science fiction. For example the Finnish Me 109s always did stall landings, because the airfields were mostly very smal. The landings were almost similar to carrier landings - the plane approached field in shallow descending turn, aligning to the runway just seconds before touchdown. By "hanging" in the air at stall speed, with slats open, the plane touched down at minimum speed at three points and the pilot could apply full brakes immediately. 109 had very good brakes and the gear was so forward, that the was no worries about nosing over with full braking. Landing could be made with higher speeds, slats not open, or they could intentionally be "popped" out even in higher speed approach (take notice: pilot did not have direct control on the slats, but he could still force them out by creating right flight condition). "Stall landing" to three points with slats open was the favoured method in Finland though. And don't forget, there was even a carrier version of the Messerchmitt, and you just don't land to carrier at high speeds. Of course these planes didn't actually operate from carrier, they they were built and operated by normal squadrons. - As a side note, Finnish pilots who visited Germany on war time and saw some of the German training or how the German combat pilots took off and landed their planes, they were quite horrified. German training in '44 seemed very rough and no 3 points landings was taught to the pilots, who approached with high speeds and came down on two wheels. At that time Germans put as many pilots through the training as possible, and didn't bother to teach the finer things about piloting to the green pilots. The runways were paved and long, so the finesse of "good" landings could be ignored. www.virtualpilots.fi/feature/articles/109myths/

[@williamgustavoleonvera6025]

Hermoso avión,muy adelantado a su época 👍❤️🛩️🫡😎

[@infolover_68]

I believe there is a slight issue: in a magazine about the deadliest weapons of WWII, the Me Bf-109 had three 20mm cannons; one at the front of the aircraft, and two more (one in each wing).

[@asator0505]

depends on the variant or what it was used for. you also have some with 30mm cannons under the wings, a 30mm cannon in the nose, a 15mm cannon in the nose, etc or in early variants no cannons at all and just MGs

[@andraslibal]

The 3d work is really nice.

[@jordanthomas4379]

I’d love to see you do the infamous v2 rocket 🚀

[@neilhaas]

Thats very interesting about the BF 109 the G series & E series. 35,000 built produced. The machine guns armaments fighting in combat in the air. 1,475 hp thats amazing. The Bf 109 is a unique aircraft of the war. Besides other air forces Swiss air force.

[@Jotinha6131]

Great video, I had never seen a so detailed explanation!

[@TamasLaszlo-83]

Awesome video! 😊I liked it special because this is my favourite WW2 fighter. Our hungarian pilots mostly flew by Bf-109Gs. What's more in a hungarian factory (Magyar Waggon és Gépgyár and Kőbánya) built more than 400 pieces (some of them used by the Luftwaffe).

[@HungarianRepublic]

I love you too fellow Hungarian

[@uma6263]

Gran video y gracias por traducirlo como siempre... es una lastima que daimler benz no haya hecho bien su trabajo ya que el motor tendía a calentarse más de lo normal y era de dar alguno que otro problema... Si hay un motor que realmente destacó en la segunda guerra mundial fue el BMW del FW 190, ese motor fue una verdadera bestia y lo mejor refrigerado a aire, ahorrándose todo tipo de problemas como los que existían en este BF 109 con tantos radiadores repartidos por el avión...

[@neilhaas]

This is the G6 Messerschmitt BF 109. Besides the Bf 109 K-4 & F-2, F-4 thats interesting.

[@sydajaxanimations]

This is the yarn hub guy right

[@BluePawPrint]

right

[@sydajaxanimations]

@@BluePawPrint Cool

[@KarlElemp]

I like the bf 109

[@srjosephxd9562]

You should bring a video about: *inside tiger 131* and why it was so popular

[@sikandar007]

Just wow This channel will surely reach million subscribers in notime please do video on rifles, pistol too

[@georgecristiancripcia4819]

Very nice video

[@T2Kron]

Nice vid

[@sebastiancruz2895]

Amazing the level of engineering of Germany

[@enrimariounicauca5349]

Es el mejor contenido de este tipo en todo KZbin. Mil gracias y felicidades por tan excelente trabajo!

[@MGB-learning]

Outstanding video and presentation.

[@Алекс-э9з2ж]

Excellent presentation of material! Thank you!

[@camilintgomery]

Magnífico canal. gracias por su excelente trabajo. Thanx a lot David

[@chrisihg2253]

A Vid about late P-51 and Spitfire would be great too

[@BananasBanana]

Very calming during projects 😌😇

[@ThinkingFingers]

Amazing models and animations!

[@TRINFSS]

No plane was a “super fighter” in WWII. The 109 was one of the best, most successful and updated models of the war.