Little correction. When I mentioned the circle like antenna up top, this is not for the FuG25. The Peilrahmen (the circle) is standard equipment and I can't quite tell how I got this wrong here. Apologies, I am only human. *These episodes can not be made without your support* Patreon: www.patreon.com/join/Bismarck *OR* PayPal: www.paypal.me/BismarckYT
@burroaks75 жыл бұрын
2:57 the blue tank its labeled Hn3 hydrazoic acid., that was most likely used as an inerting gas to take up the space in the fuel tanks as fuel was consumed and to assist the fuel pumps moving the fuel due to it being above atmospheric pressure , additional fire suppression to add to there self sealing rubber tanks
@MilitaryAviationHistory5 жыл бұрын
Signaling flares
@notmenotme6144 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory I’ve read that some night fighters used illumination flares. I don’t know if the 262 was ever used as a night fighter?
@kitschquixote2 жыл бұрын
@@notmenotme614 Me 262B-la/U1
@watchfordpilot5 жыл бұрын
Great walk round, it's the first time I've ever had a look inside and outside an Me 262 in such fascinating detail. A very informative pair of videos, many thanks.
@Christopher28fair4 жыл бұрын
I'm an American with two Swiss parents - I can't speak German but I was delighted every time you whipped through one of those forty-syllable words. Excellent video. Also, thank you for my Porsche.
@tacticaljackson5 жыл бұрын
I’ve seen two of these beautiful birds; one at the Naval Aviation Museum and another at the Air Force Museum here in the US. That said, I’ve definitely never seen one this close! Thanks for the great content as always.
@RWBHere4 жыл бұрын
There is another one at the RAF Museum in Cosford, England.
@petter67105 жыл бұрын
I paid this beautiful aircraft a visit last year. Technicians were working on the nose camera an elderly gentleman helping provided interesting info was very proud of the plane
@1107Lily5 жыл бұрын
I would like to see a detailed tour of a FW 190 cockpit.
@keithplymale23745 жыл бұрын
Both of these are modeling gold for anyone doing a scale model of this aircraft.
@cannonfodder43765 жыл бұрын
When one looks at the cockpits and build quality of the 262 in this museum and the FW-190A5 of FHC and the BF-109s of other museums, the deterioration of German industrial system is just so stark. Levels of restoration not withstanding. A remarkable if still under developed and simple aircraft. Fantastic work as always Bismarck.
@dbaider94675 жыл бұрын
Coming from a VFR Cessna, this looks quite busy! Smart guys flew these.
@Imnotyourdoormat5 жыл бұрын
beyond outstanding video, explained methodically in clear, precise terminology with additional intel that most disregard when doing a full-breakdown, complete with even the difficult angle photography that's very thorough. ive not seen a better descriptive tour of the 262 period...well-done and kutgw!!! did not know the instrument panel was wooden.
@cambo12005 жыл бұрын
I’ve seen this at the Deutsches museum many times, but was never able to see all these details. Thank you!
@englishnature78505 жыл бұрын
Great information on German cockpit design, you helped me understand some of the workings.
@MBkufel5 жыл бұрын
I always firmly believed that you will make this episode public in a week or so. Thank you for not locking any of your amazing main content behind a paywall
@MilitaryAviationHistory5 жыл бұрын
I believe in always making content public. As a thank you I will continue to provide early access to channel members or Patreon supporters but all videos are made public eventually
@joepapp015 жыл бұрын
Really cool. Always wanted to see inside the cockpit of a 262. Good job!
@tommygun60283 жыл бұрын
Great Show 👍🤝😎
@larryjenkinson55255 жыл бұрын
Thank you for yet another brilliant video/s.
@spigot9933 жыл бұрын
Kudos on being able to take a look at a 262 pit, not many people have, so thank you very much for sharing that!
@slick44015 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video. Thanks a bunch!!!!
@WanderingShadow1005 жыл бұрын
First time ever for me to see the interiors of Me-262. Superb !!!👍👍❤
@MrWolfstar85 жыл бұрын
Really cool. Thanks for the video.
@Hero007ization4 жыл бұрын
This plane set the framework for the future templates of jets for many many years. Kool informative video. Vielen Dank !
@williamkennedy54925 жыл бұрын
Excellent walk round talk on this aircraft, after 40 years in aviation i actually learnt something new today, namely the homing device ! When compared to the Gloucester Meteor the ME 262 looks years ahead, I have seen one in the "flesh" at one of the RAF museums and it is a very very impressive machine !
@PanzerBuyer5 жыл бұрын
Do you know what the flare ejection system was for?
@cmacdhon5 жыл бұрын
Another wonderfully informative video. Thank you.
@warhead_beast76615 жыл бұрын
Could you maybe do a special about Fighter sights and their development? I know its probably very much
@Longshot_0965 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! Incredibly interesting. Many thanks!
@zlee114 жыл бұрын
What a fantastic video. Thank you
@mohabatkhanmalak11615 жыл бұрын
This aircraft is so amazing, truly cutting edge. The front view of the fuselage is triangular, this is the best shape for weight saving and aerodynamic airflow. You showed us the cockpit, but the ejection seat by itself needs a separate video, just like the engines. The Japanese also built their version called the Nakajima Kikka. There were similarities but their's was a high altitude interceptor/fighter aircraft (to counter the bomber, mainly B 29 menace), so the wings were shorter and the tail end was broader. Some parts were the same as early aircraft such as the front landing gear of the Mitsubishi Zero.
@darkiee695 жыл бұрын
No ejection seat in the 262
@fortisfortunaadiuvat92625 жыл бұрын
Great video very detailed
@blade_pooper23975 жыл бұрын
Inside the Bismarck’s cockpit. You’re like the plane version of the chieftain
@billdewahl70075 жыл бұрын
Isn't the compressed air for the emergency gear/flap deployment?
@user-we7fe4sc5t5 жыл бұрын
Ah, great video as always! Very informative, thank! ;D
@fw14215 жыл бұрын
From a modelers perspective this was very informative. I’ve built a bunch of 262’s over the years and always wanted to know what all the items in the cockpit were seeing as I don’t read German!👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@richardhoffmann18582 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the great videos with many details about this iconic airplane. As you know we only peeled back a couple of layers there is many more. When I look at the wiring and hardware configurations throughout the videos I see striking similarities to the machines I work on today as an elevator / escalator mechanic foreman. There are a few elevators and escalators still in service of German design that are over 50 years old, which we still service today for NYC Subway system, many have recently been replaced and are not as good in my opinion . Ich bin Vorarbeiter eines Aufzugs und Rolltreppen Mechanikers
@Maverick-gg2do5 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video about the German IFF?
@kennethlee16075 жыл бұрын
Maverick Raphael H. Sebastian +1
@remi1au5 жыл бұрын
excellent ! ... I love this series of videos.
@fazole5 жыл бұрын
The pressurized air lever in the cockpit is likely used to release air from a canister (accumulator in US aviation terms) that will blow down the landing gear and possibly flaps. Compressed air could also be used to start an engine if there is not enough airflow to windmill the compressor blades.
@mhttymythic94985 жыл бұрын
There is a ME-262 in Everett Washington USA that is getting ready for its test flight.
@PanzerBuyer5 жыл бұрын
A new reproduction I guess?
@fieryfive01274 жыл бұрын
@@PanzerBuyer little late to the party, but a original powered by modified Jumo 004s for increased reliability and service life Edit: I was thinking of the Flying Hertiage museums me262, the everett ones seem to be new production
@Cheka__5 жыл бұрын
Very cool video! Great job!
@kipmeneer4 жыл бұрын
Wasn't there a version with a 50mm cannon? If so, what was it used for?
@richardjones73865 жыл бұрын
There is a night configuration ME 262 in what I believe is original paint, in Johannesburg. Looks more original than the aircraft featured. Excellent video. Thanks
@chronicargonaut48665 жыл бұрын
...remember my Dad talking about seeing these in action...a pair of them were trying to bomb a bridge, but were overshooting their target...they tried twice before three P-51's came to engage them...he said the 262's just pulled up in a spiral and left the 51's like they were standing still
@carlosteran81145 жыл бұрын
Gracias por la súper visita, as soon as I got "possibilities" I'll help your page !!! Adiós.
@Gman-1095 жыл бұрын
Awesome video, my favorite WW2 fighter. Great commentary, imagine if Germany had put more resources into building these when they weren't under as much pressure from day/night bombing, and as you said didn't have to resort to sheds in a forest or underground/etc facilities, with no corners needing to be cut. It still amazes me what the 262 could and did go what with all the challenges Germany and the LW faced in building, maintaining, and fighting this amazing machine. I also think that if they went with 2 MK103 instead of 4 MK108, it would have been more deadly, as the pilots said the low muzzle velocity of the guns combined with the high closure rate made aiming and getting solid gun solutions very, very difficult. Great vid/pic of the R4M as well.
@GaryCameron4 жыл бұрын
It would have been interesting to see how this would have done against the Gloster Meteors that were being produced in numbers by 1945, but they wouldn't let fly over enemy territory lest they be shot down and reverse engineered. The brits held their jet technology very close at the time.
@yuppy19673 жыл бұрын
That is an awesome bird, thank you!
@jimbe014 жыл бұрын
Are you sure that the “loop” type antenna is for Identification Friend or Foe purposes. I think it was actually used for radio direction (DF) finding purposes.🤔
@MilitaryAviationHistory4 жыл бұрын
I think I posted something about this in the pinned comment.
@nitaihat124 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory i think the pinned comment is no longer pinned, or maybe youtube is just screwing around. anyway great and interesting pair of videos. i'd like to ask about the flare dispensers mentioned immidiatly after that, what is their peropus? heat seeking missiles were clearly not in service (unless there's something here i don't know about), were they for lighting for ground troops or something?
@TheEvilmooseofdoom4 жыл бұрын
@@nitaihat12 I think for marking targets on the ground.. Flares that is. :)
@TheEvilmooseofdoom4 жыл бұрын
Every loop antenna I have seen on aircraft have been for RDF.
@82MPN5 жыл бұрын
Like you said @ 8:10 . The right temperature gauge looks off.... really off. 130C max. That would be something for oil or water temp on a prop like a BF109 or FW190. It should mirror the 900C gauge on the left side.
@JohnSmith-qv6hp4 жыл бұрын
All German fighters ww2 had fighter bomber variants fw290 was outstanding in role me109 not so good
@JohnSmith-qv6hp4 жыл бұрын
Fw 190 outstanding fighter bomber
@FlyNAA4 жыл бұрын
The labelling is x10. You'll see the red line, under that scheme, matches the left gauge.
@Lotorc5 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Superb video! How would a pilot have used the IFF back then? Was it simply for signaling a friendly position or a tower during approach? If it worked both ways, what steps did the pilot take to engage this, what type of output was generated, and how did the pilot interpret the output to discern friendly from foe while in combat?
@Reactordrone5 жыл бұрын
It just IDs the aircraft as German on the Freya radar system. It stops the radar operators from directing fighters or flak against them although it was later exploited by the allies to locate Luftwaffe night fighters and so became less effective later in the war.
@Shadow_Lunatale5 жыл бұрын
War Thunder could'nt explain those gauges to me, but Bismark could. Thanks alot for the cool and informative video.
@banarcus5 жыл бұрын
Wow great video. I love this aircraft. I've actually seen a real ME262 here in Australia disassembled but original. I'm not sure what the plans are for it.
@71tbomb4 жыл бұрын
Where was that. I'd love to see one. I'm in Northern NSW.
@banarcus4 жыл бұрын
@@71tbomb down at the Treloar Centre which is a part of the Australian War Memorial. It was in pieces when I last saw it.
@71tbomb4 жыл бұрын
@@banarcus Thanx. I'll have to check it out sometime. I'm thinking of heading to Summer Nats anyway. Cheers for that.
@momotheelder71245 жыл бұрын
Great idea for a series in fact insane that it hasn't been done before.
@jpjpish18305 жыл бұрын
Best one yet.
@gmcjetpilot5 жыл бұрын
Canopy lanyard spring looks like spring door on a house screen door.
@D.Brett.Cartwright Жыл бұрын
I wonder what an original ME-262 control stick in good condition might sell for these days, any thoughts?
@surekhakhole5255 жыл бұрын
Please do a video like this on the He111
@sciencetechfreakers37775 жыл бұрын
Are there any Arado-235 left even just damaged frames.
@panzerkampfwagenvausfa53815 жыл бұрын
Arado Ar-234?
@sciencetechfreakers37775 жыл бұрын
@@panzerkampfwagenvausfa5381 I knew It wasn't 235 but I was too lazy to check, and yes that jet bomber it's very effective for it's class.
@panzerkampfwagenvausfa53815 жыл бұрын
@@sciencetechfreakers3777 Its fine, but here in the Air and Space Muesum in Washington D.C. There is A Ar-234-B-2
@sciencetechfreakers37775 жыл бұрын
@@panzerkampfwagenvausfa5381 oh that's so nice. I'm pretty sure bis will cover her when he get the chance to visit U.S
@trr940015 жыл бұрын
The Smithsonian’s Arado is on display at the Udvar-Hazy Hangar near Dulles airport. They also have an ME-163 and a Do-335.
@kkteutsch64165 жыл бұрын
Willy doesn' t painted those 262's noses as shark mouths - as Curtiss made on P-40 - but, look at nose's frontal shape, isn't the same. ?
@MB-THX11384 жыл бұрын
Thank you for a highly informative video. Have you made one on the ho 229?
@danielfmontero5 жыл бұрын
I would never say that cabin is from 1945
@splo1nger9095 жыл бұрын
Such a beautiful aircraft.
@SasukeUchiha-pv4xn5 жыл бұрын
More inside the cockpit please
@stevebutters3065 жыл бұрын
Audio is exceptionally quiet here. Volume maxed out but the green bar is only going up about 1/5 of the way on the volume mixer.
@MultiZirkon5 жыл бұрын
Would it really be good idea to have so many cables in the same yellow color?
@MilitaryAviationHistory5 жыл бұрын
Hey Ole, your question prompted me to reach out to the museum to ask them on this. Reply just came in, as far as they can tell, the cables are original. By the point this aircraft was constructed (Jan/Feb 45) any sort of regulation on colour-coding (if it existed, I don't know - it's something I haven't looked in to yet) would have been out of the window anyway.
@MultiZirkon5 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory Good answer! ...I just wondered whether it was restored to just look "nice". Now I know it was not. Thumbs for the museum then :-)
@spurgear45 жыл бұрын
Im most aircraft that I have worked on the electrical systems are wired with white. Stamped on these wires are codes designating what system and function of the wires belong . Basically you have to go to the schematics diagram figure out what wire you are looking for and pick through the bundle to find the wire. I have seen colored cables attached to generators but usually white is the standard.
@paoloviti61565 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory yes, it is correct that most of the electric cables are yellow on the German airplanes! Generally on each cable is attached a code every once a while along the cable making the life of the electrician somewhat easier but he will always need a schematic chart to "navigate"! Btw it is very interesting to note that generally the interior is far more original including the inspection stamps on the interior of panels! But I have a question for you: the Revi 16B gunsight can be rotated and slide forward, is it to protect the pilot's face when crash landing? Again a very interesting video and keep posting!
@spurgear45 жыл бұрын
@Trevor Taylor Exactly, I do remember chasing wires in an oily area in a wheel well and most of the wire stamping had come off. Not alot of fun.
@paultraynorbsc6275 жыл бұрын
Nice review
@know14622 жыл бұрын
hello sir, may i reuse parts of this video for my content?
@EdwardRLyons5 жыл бұрын
Excellent set of videos about this fascinating aircraft. But, do tell us more about the flare dispensers. What Allied weapon(s) were they designed to counter?
@FlyNAA4 жыл бұрын
Probably meant for signalling (different colors) or lighting up a field at night. At least that was common for the era.
@bowhunting19544 жыл бұрын
my favorite plane!
@WarReport.5 жыл бұрын
Great video
@watchfordpilot5 жыл бұрын
Yippee! Tee shirt arrived today (Saturday). Well chuffed - cheers.
@craighagenbruch38005 жыл бұрын
in the first part you mentioned that they tried attemping to make a fighter bomber out of me262 are there any op examples? if so how successful if any was it?
@surekhakhole5255 жыл бұрын
WoW this is Glorious
@Apollo_16415 жыл бұрын
1:52 Flares? What purpose did they serve in a pre-Air to Air Missile era?
@GaryCameron4 жыл бұрын
The AC-47 spooky used in Vietnam carried lots of flares to illuminate enemy positions. I imagine it might serve the same purpose, especially since there was no night vision equipment at the time. Drop them over a target area first so you can see what you are shooting at.
@JohnSmith-qv6hp4 жыл бұрын
@@GaryCameron flares would signal if wounded aboard on landing approach as on B17s maybe if radio kaput etc
@bjw48595 жыл бұрын
Dam that was detailed, very informative, had to watch this after part 1, this would have to be my favourite aircraft of all time, so glad an original still exists. Are there any real ones flying, I was told all the ones you see at airshows are replicas ?.
@KnowYoutheDukeofArgyll18415 жыл бұрын
Aye, just the rebuilds, no originals fly, which is a pity. The new ones use American jet engines.
@user-om6px1zy3d4 жыл бұрын
What was the purpose of the flare dispensers? Was there a threat of heat sensing arms guidance then?
@TheEvilmooseofdoom4 жыл бұрын
While I can't say for this bird in WWII many fighters carried flares for several reasons. If the radio was out and you needed to signal a issue upon landing you would fire colored flare to signal your distress. They were also used to mark targets or objects of interest on the ground. Things like that.
@keithriggs44565 жыл бұрын
Great presentation. Why flares? No IR seekers in those days.
@MilitaryAviationHistory5 жыл бұрын
Signaling
@michaelb33635 жыл бұрын
Bis, speaking of bombs on the 262, I have read that the jet bombers proved to be terrible platforms for bombing because the excess speed and lack of sophisticated bomb-aiming and release mechanisms made it virtually impossible for the pilot to gauge his release-point with any accuracy. Do you know whether this is fact or fiction? Thanks for these 2 wonderful episodes, and good hunting!
@DumbledoreMcCracken4 жыл бұрын
I wish you'd narrate the HE-219 in Dulles Virginia USA.
@scaneagle625 жыл бұрын
Hey i have never seen flares dispensers on such early planes. I thought they only came about when heat seeking missiles came to be. What were they used for ? I've never seen any pictures of ww2 planes using flares. Except maybe at night to mark a target for bombers. Awesome video.
@Michael-zj3cn5 жыл бұрын
Could be parachute flares, used to illuminate a area. Not that I know, but they were heavily used around this time.
@herrakaarme5 жыл бұрын
I wonder how different it would have looked like if Germany had built these during peacetime, not while they were getting defeated already and running out of everything.
@Leon_der_Luftige5 жыл бұрын
John Jalas Spotted the racist.
@Leon_der_Luftige5 жыл бұрын
@John Jalas So you don't object to being called out as being a racist? That's interesting.
@Leon_der_Luftige5 жыл бұрын
@John Jalas Hope the tinfoil hat isn't too tight. Which, I'm afraid, is. Stop the boozing and get a grip pathetic creature.
@pawsnpistons5 жыл бұрын
The US would have dropped Little Boy, Fat man and many more at Germany. End of story and end of germany.
@old_guard24314 жыл бұрын
Learning stuff. Sauerstoff = oxygen. Doesn't taste very sour, at least at 21%. Apparently the name in German comes from an early misconception that oxygen was an essential component of acids. Kudos to the museum for the cut-aways and removed panels. (Another well-thought-out and informative video. By the way.)
@FlyNAA4 жыл бұрын
Interesting. In Bulgarian the word for oxygen also comes from sour. I always connected it in my mind to being corrosive.
@memorarenz5 жыл бұрын
So beautiful
@BleedingUranium5 жыл бұрын
10:41 I had no idea it was possible to charge the cannons in-flight. With with MK 108 firing from an open bolt, that means standard practice was to take off with the bolts closed (certainly safer and less wear on the guns, etc) and then charge them for a dogfight? Interesting.
@MilitaryAviationHistory5 жыл бұрын
The stick itself is a standard stick, also used in different planes. Whether that button saw an actual use here, I am not yet sure
@BleedingUranium5 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory I didn't realize that either, that's neat too, thanks! All these in-depth videos you do are always fantastic, so a big thank you in general for all the content on the channel. :)
@renaldocathright31103 жыл бұрын
Wow I did not know this plane has pilot ejection seat available at that time
@bohica32645 жыл бұрын
This plane looks absolutely predatory. The NSDAP, as horrible as they were, always had the coolest toys.
@thundercrosssplitattack20645 жыл бұрын
Hold on, IFF system? As of visually or just for ground radar?
@Reactordrone5 жыл бұрын
For radar. FuG 25 gave a response to the Freya radar systems. The flare launchers were for visual IFF.
@Obi1-KenBone-Me5 жыл бұрын
But can you show as su57'd cockpit?
@eloyex4 жыл бұрын
i have been in germany doing "ww2 tourism" and will never understand why the INSIST to take our and delete svanstikas and other signs of the equipments ..!! this signs belongs to that period and is historically accurate. German engineering was just ahead of its time and is not a political matter.
@TheEvilmooseofdoom4 жыл бұрын
Against the law in Germany, I think they're considered to be anti-constitutional or something. Anyway outside of movies and TV shows showing Nazi symbols is not allowed.
@perrooceaniko20054 жыл бұрын
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom it is a huge lack of perspective and pragmatism.... nazi (not Germany) did very bad things. DO I approve that..? Not DO I approve racial prosecution.? Hell not ...! (I am immigrant by the way). Do I Approve war ..? Of course not .! DO I like german engineering of that era ? Of course yes ! Even more, I understand why Germany went to war (stupid and absurd Versailles agreement) . Things happened, sad and terrible, but hide history has never been the solution. Cheers.
@tramlink85445 жыл бұрын
Did you ever find out if the gunsight was original? also, next time youre in Dubendorf, CH see if you can get into the ME-109E3 we have there, would be interesting to see if there are any cockpit differences between an export Swiss airforce BF-109 and a LW 109
@MilitaryAviationHistory5 жыл бұрын
I asked them a bunch of questions recently but not on the sight yet
@BCSchmerker4 жыл бұрын
+Bis18marck70 *At Time **7:38**, I spotted a combination attitude and yaw-rate indicator.* What manufacturers and part numbers? I'd consider the attitude/yaw-rate indicator a period-appropriate upgrade for the Fantasy of Flight Bayerische Flugzeugwerke Bf 108 in overhaul as of January 2020.
@JustSomeCanuck5 жыл бұрын
Why does it have a flare dispenser? It can't be countermeasures, since there were no heat-seeking missiles at the time.
@nightjarflying5 жыл бұрын
The signal flares were fired when approaching the landing field to alert ground crew & Flak units. The Germans shot down a lot of their own aircraft near their airfields because most aircraft approaching at low level would be the allies attacking.
@JustSomeCanuck5 жыл бұрын
That makes sense. Thanks.
@chrisbrodbeck19613 жыл бұрын
They should've produced it in 1939, they had already engineered the drawings at that point....I would definetly fly it even today. Simple and effective....I want to ask about what fuels it can and could use...
@ILOVEZOZER5 жыл бұрын
What is the long, little window for, just below the canopy???
@MilitaryAviationHistory5 жыл бұрын
The cutaway? That was installed by the museum a long time ago to allow people to have a look inside.
@Waty84135 жыл бұрын
11:22 The thingamajig on a screen door that keeps it from slamming except it doesn't and the door slams shut anyway?
@mrdiplomat90184 жыл бұрын
No, actually it looks like the springy thingy that stops the screen door from ‘opening’ too far, I think 👍🇩🇪
@DirtyHairy15 жыл бұрын
Are the handwritten labels original? The look so to me
@kemop065 жыл бұрын
Amazing jets the Me 262s thank you for the two videos and greetings from the U.S.A
@PeterParker-si8uq3 жыл бұрын
how they see meter gauge when flying at night
@phineascampbell31037 ай бұрын
Tricycle landing gear!! Omg, they took the wheels off trikes! Man, resources were bad by the end huh!?
@NWSaint4 жыл бұрын
pardon my ignorance, but @ 2:00.. early GPS ??
@bubiruski80673 жыл бұрын
Flux Gate and ADF (automatic direction finder).
@burroaks75 жыл бұрын
2:20 all those disconnected hydraulic lines
@GreenAir_5 жыл бұрын
Great vid! Can you make one about Panzer tactics in WW2? In urban, and flat land woul be great!
@MilitaryAviationHistory5 жыл бұрын
Tanks don't have wings
@GreenAir_5 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory Good point😅 Maybe in a vid together with Bo time gaming?
@envitech023 жыл бұрын
1:53 Flare dispensers??? Were there Sidewinder missiles in 1945?