Inside The Major Supreme Court Reforms Biden Is Reportedly Set To Endorse

On "Forbes Newsroom," UPenn Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt discussed the possible changes to the Supreme Court that President Biden is reportedly ready to endorse, and whether they can even be implemented.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com

[@Daniel-nr2uf]

Big government overreach.We the people have had enough.

[@TimothyNew-f7n]

The whole idea of the Supreme Court is to NOT be political; if you have competent judges appointed who actually rule based on the Constitution, who appoints them doesn't matter. It only matters for those who wish to have judges they can control and who won't follow the constitution.

[@litrpg101]

Yeah, well that all changed when 6 judges bent the knee to a political party and stopped caring about what was actually written in the constitution.

[@sew_gal7340]

I can only imagine the outrage that would happen if trump did this in a supreme court full of left justices

[@mariederivas6901]

leave the Supreme Court alone as it is, as it has been and how it has functioned since the beginning.

[@mariederivas6901]

Having a two party Supreme Court - how in the world would this be justice? All Justices are to be appointed based on total fairness and nonpartisan. This is a stupid idea all the way around.

[@JO-tb7rh]

He has no authority to make changes and this professor is full of crap.

[@earthlingsareinsane7193]

He's a comyist !! Like all the comyist in the USA they're trying to overthrow our government and rip up our constitution.

[@briangman3]

Totally

[@RussellDehart-bg6vx]

@@briangman3 like the hell he isn't. Just look at these so called judices.

[@spindoggytheexplorer2915]

@@RussellDehart-bg6vxyeah they’re upholding the actual verbiage of the constitution, problem is one political party wants to bend the constitution and the other wants to uphold it.

[@kttba77]

At 14 minutes... did ya Hear, if the Bill is Not passed, 4 Seats are Automatically added.

[@robertfischer380]

And..... in 2025, Trump adds 6 more Justices.😅😅

[@paulinesmith5670]

So, threaten the supreme court...

[@ruthnovena40]

HOW can an adm who went against the constitution to 'forgive debt using powers they do not have seek to 'reform the SC?

[@hawaiingirlbeth]

This is absolutely insane.

[@brandonzettel8444]

This wouldn't even be discussed if the parties were reversed . Facts

[@allablr5765]

Did Biden consider term limits for himself? It's long overdue.

[@citizenjustice-el9pe]

Nope, he gets 2 terms IF re elected. The House of representatives like Nancy Pelosi, have been re elected like 15 to 20 times, literally a career. Congress has 2 year terms. Senate has 6 year terms. Biden does nothing to put term limits on THEM! Just SCOTUS??? Power move, and horrible for our Country!

[@ChrisCarlin-is8wv]

Maybe the Judicial branch will reform the Executive branch. The are equal branches. What wrong with these people?

[@do0zer1976]

The courts should not be as political as they are.... The House and Senate wont touch it unless there is money involved... That leaves everything to the Supreme Court: it shouldnt be this way but it is.... Something needs to change: but what Biden is suggesting is riddled with political bias....

[@jamie0]

"the court is out of step with the American people". He's clearly only thinking about the west coast, north east cost, and Austin Texas in those "american people".

[@DanSheehan-dt9rv]

your opinion....

[@hillbilliesrights8140]

Not gonna happen an I hope don does get two more pics

[@bryanmcwaters6983]

Does this guy also believe it's a problem for Congress members and Senators to serve 40 yrs? Does he want term limits for Congress/Senate also?

[@GoatSays]

It's less of a problem because they are voted in by the people and have to be re-elected. Not saying term limits on congress/senate would be a bad idea though. I don't really like the idea personally of career politicians.

[@pcliftonjr]

Good thing the Court is a co-equal branch of our government. The Executive branch doesn't get to charge the rules when they lose!

[@kidicarus2768]

Only to be struck down as unconstitutional.

[@backyardchoppers4571]

He can get it. 60% of houseand senate. His ammendment requires 38 states it wont even hit commity.

[@santaclause978]

And all the actions of the Democrat members.

[@SFD45182]

Kermit Roosevelt wasted so much time to talk political fanfiction.

[@brucetames9022]

10 years limited for supreme Court judges. Period.

[@patriciaeddy7629]

The Supreme Court needs to STOP PLAYING GOD !!!

[@jamesdouthat3999]

how are they playing god

[@patriciaeddy7629]

Thank God!

[@kathyandersen1339]

Appreciate the Imformation given here! We're experiencing a Supreme Court that is Way Out Of Alignment and Evidence to which Confirms that. Corruption on many levels, appears to be serving the Republican Party, When It Is Imperative The Supreme Court Must Abide By The Rule of Laws. The opinion is important and concerning to go to the next levels, Ethics, Accountability, Etc.