LSAT Logic Games Pt. 2 (Sorting)

New videos now available! Check out the updated series for the August 2024 (and beyond) test here:
• The New Insight LSAT P...
---
The fifth lesson of the FREE LSAT prep course offered by Insight LSAT. This is a comprehensive course for LSAT preparation, taught by an instructor who scored 179 on the LSAT. We go through every section, providing expert advice, strategies, illustrations of methods, and more!
In this lesson, we move on to the second major type of logic game, sorting games. Strategies, diagrams, sample games and questions, and homework are all featured.
Topics include:
- general sorting game strategy
- basic (unfixed number) sorting games
- fixed number sorting games
- conditional sorting games
- sorting games with extra dimensions
- sequencing and sorting hybrids
- framing

[@insightlsat]

Hi everyone! The original Insight LSAT Prep Course, launched in 2017, is now outdated. I have released a new series of eight videos that is updated for the modern test and incorporates all that I've learned tutoring since I released the original videos almost a decade ago. kzbin.info/aero/PLafC0Olll40wXlcvb3JrIO1jkxuPJvz5D Thank you for all the support over the years. I hope you enjoy the new series. -Albert

[@teasp00ns]

I can't afford LSAT tutoring, and struggle most with the analytical reasoning section - your videos alone brought my practice scores from 149 to 162 :) Hoping to get 170+ before applying next year. Thank you so much, you are an excellent teacher

[@kyrasundleaf3820]

thats so awesome! :)

[@joseoviedo4529]

Hey Laurel, Im in the same boat... youtube has been a huge help...Check out this guy "LSAT Wizard" channel he posted a free covid relief 4 part series that is long but very good and his explanations really helped me get better grasp of concepts and what LSAT is testing for (very specific). good luck

[@s.tiaira9081]

Good luck 🍀

[@bobfryfish]

How did you study? How did the LSAT go?

[@aymansgarage]

what's your study schedule like?

[@r.p.8906]

Only a true gentleman shares so much knowledge and wisdom for free. I am very humbled and very grateful. Easily the top courses I have ever seen, both in the paid and non paid courses. Thank you so much. Your generosity is highly appreciated!

[@nanaosei9784]

The fact that I'm actually understanding and even spotted the 3 identical answer choices at 32:40 had me all kinds of excited! But the fact that I'm getting them all correct has me even more excited!!Lol Loq1gic games used to have me so lost and reminded me of math but thanks to you I'm learning so fast!!

[@oghenewoke]

lol Nana you made it this far in the video lesson how did you come out on the test

[@prettyneev]

This is helping me a lot for the LSAT. Taking my test on 2/22/20.

[@kelseycoleman2715]

Me too! Good luck!

[@mehtabmann8583]

Good luck tomorrow!

[@prettyneev]

Mehtab Mann Thank you so much!!

[@mehtabmann8583]

Liam Y that’s the one I’m taking too!

[@mehtabmann8583]

Liam Y First time writing it for fall 2021

[@christinea6318]

You helped me a lot prepping for the LSAT. I made the mistake of trying to learn it on my own and just taking the practice tests without knowing the background information of the questions given. You are amazing and I am so grateful that I found your youtube channel. P.S. I am in love with your voice

[@algraham2027]

Great study.. wish me luck. 52 year old and going to take LSAT June 2021. Good Luck All 👍

[@laurasolomon1522]

@@algraham2027 congratulations 🎈. How was your test?

[@Kevwe.O]

SAME!!..I am so glad I found this page before I went far into my LSAT preparations. I love his voice too.

[@sukik8234]

Questions: Unfixed number: 40:24 Fixed number: 56:26 Conditional Sorting: 1:13:09 Extra dimension: None - not common game type Sequencing - sorting hybrid: 1:58:48

[@bonghalee]

A hidden hero

[@alla.e]

Thank you so much for these videos :'). You don't even know how much of a help these are. You're a great teacher. I got every question right throughout this video on what used to be the most challenging section for me!

[@beatsthattalk6690]

Of all the videos on KZbin I found, do I ever appreciate your videos the most! Thank you again

[@auntjossy4161]

Thank you so much. May God bless you every time your video blesses someone. It’s been four years on KZbin and I’m so blessed. I’m ready for April 2022. At my age, it’s not easy just reading, your videos complete my readings. Thanks again

[@ivalinapasse2469]

You Make It More Understanding. Thanks Looking Forward to taking this Exam. It's going to be a Breeze!!!

[@rmarie3261]

thank you for all you have done. this entire mini course is worth thousands and by far the best free prep on KZbin and I will be making a contribution

[@hanamohammed8469]

This helped so much!!!! Your explanations are so great and know that your work is very appreciated!! I was struggling so much to comprehend diagramming but happened to get every question right on your videos. Thanks!

[@louisegoodman1525]

Just btw, I am 100% donating my score on the LSAT in dollars when I get my results back. These videos are a life saver, thanks bro

[@bobfryfish]

How did ya do?

[@louisegoodman1525]

@@bobfryfish 162! These videos helped me so much!

[@ivalinapasse2469]

Great Teacher. Fun with you. Going to try it with my Kaplan LSAT Preparation!!!!

[@Iswearitsnotme1]

If anyone needs motivation: my first practice test i got 9/22 on logic games. After a week of watching these videos I went up to 17/22 and the five i got wrong was because i ran out of time. Of all the sections, logic games are the ones you can 100% improve on.

[@jessicakandikatla8117]

I started studying the logical games using these videos and they were very helpful. I was getting better at them but now I got to know that LSAT is no longer having logical games from Aug 2024. Maybe I should focus on other sections from now on.

[@insightlsat]

Hi! Glad to hear you found the videos helpful! Yes - you're right that there will be no logic games on the LSAT starting with the August 2024 test. But I just posted a new prep course designed for the new format. I hope you enjoy it! kzbin.info/www/bejne/jKCrkpx9nK6KmLs

[@dennislam8102]

The set up is helpful. Play the number of Group. "Intuition"come from long-time practice.

[@sugondesenuts69]

Taking my exam in 2 weeks. These vids are incredibly helpful!

[@dougiegame]

I came back to say I scored a 170 only prepping through your videos.

[@gladius187]

@insightLSAT These are phenomenal videos, very informative. My question, regards the time constraints given that the LSAT provides about 2.5 min. per question. How do we economize time? Thank you!

[@yenyenson1720]

Great instructions. Just great!!!

[@hbk92701]

For question, 20 on the extra dimensions, you can make an inference. If FH have to be on the same line, and E and L are opposite lines, that means FHL or FHE have to be a line. Given that D is in portland, and can't be in one of those lines, D and G have to be on the same line and therefore can't be in the same city. So further that leads to two possible situations. FHL/DGE or FHE/DGL with D being the only one we know what the city is. And those are M/V assignments. I might be wrong but that came to me as I see that HF limit that only E/L can be on the same line with them.

[@matthewpresley9983]

Thank you so much for these

[@flopus7]

Quick thought: with the question at 1:20:00, I think there were several inferences that you didn't show. I think D always had to be a Portland Vendor and F + H always had to be Marketing.

[@stevehm5]

Excellent videos, thank you for your time. For the problem at 1:20:00 the brute force is caused by missed inferences. FH cannot be vendors along with G, or else E is horizontal to L thus breaking a rule. (FH must be marketing) Also, since FH is at the top, you know the remaining spot has to be E/L to respect the E vertical to L rule. You can infer from this that there is no room for D at the top (since F-G-E/L is there, not necessarily in that order), thus D must be the Portland vendor. Knowing these added inferences, the brute force question becomes simpler: G clearly cannot be in Portland since it must be a vendor and D is the Portland vendor. Hope this helps.

[@RebeccaColmanettiMartinez]

very helpful, thank you.

[@robobrain10000]

15:54 you could further add to the diagram for completion's sake, the rule: If T(z) --> P(w), Q(w), U(y), S(y), K(z), M(z).

[@XOLegato]

Hi! Excellent videos, thank you so much for putting them up. In the "Extra Dimensions" question around 1:20:00, you form the grid under the assumption that each city has one of each role (marketing or vendor). However, as far as I can tell, the question doesn't specify this restriction - it seems possible that a city could have say two marketing people or vendor people. Would you mind pointing out where the roles-per-city rule is specified in the question, or if it's not there, give us some advice about when to assume such a restriction? I know in other cases you are supposed to NOT make assumptions that aren't specified in the question text, but your example worries me that there is a case where either I didn't make a necessary assumption or I didn't catch it from the text. Thanks!

[@albertcotugno1419]

Good catch - my mistake. If it doesn't specify, you can't assume that you need one of each. For the purposes of following the video, though, for now pretend that it says something to the effect of "Each event must be staffed by one marketing assistant and one vendor assistant."

[@XOLegato]

Albert Cotugno Ok awesome, thank you! Glad that my evaluation was correct, I was so worried that I had missed something and couldn't figure out why haha. That was the only time in your videos where I was like "damn... I really have no idea how he got that" even after the explanation. Whew! Thank you again for these videos, they are super helpful (especially the logic games training and the primer on formal logic). I'm about to take my first timed practice test and am feeling good :)

[@albertcotugno1419]

You bet - good luck :)

[@creightongerard3895]

I seriously just freaked out for a minute over the exact same issue. It's awesome that you respond in the comments section. This is the first time in any of the lessons that I've looked down here. Thanks

[@XOLegato]

Creighton Gerard :)

[@jasonlou2013S]

Thanks. I need this.

[@aerosmithsrinivasan8138]

Also in critical choice question 3.. z>y (rule from the master diagram) also another reason why E was the wrong answer

[@kenzaburooe7146]

Thanks so much for all these videos, but at 1:32:00, the game is not broken by the H-F rule, F could go in M/R. It's broken by the E-L rule where there would be no vertical spots left for E to be opposite L, but that could also be fixed by swapping D/L which is basically the same as what you did by switching H up to the M row. Not to be nitpickiy, but thought you would want to catch that! Thanks for all the videos.

[@insightlsat]

Hey there - actually if you follow carefully, I was only saying there that if I try to put H in V-Q, we then see that G has to go in V-R, and that leaves no room on the bottom row for F, which needs to be in the same row as H. Since I didn't need to make the move of putting H in V-Q, I just backed it up after that and went in a different direction. My goal there is to try to put the conditions expressed in answer choices A and C into my diagram without betraying any of the rules. If I can do that, both A and C are not the right answer. The tricky part is that, if things go wrong when I try to do that, I won't be able to know right away whether A or C messed it up. I'd then have to try both individually, which can be inefficient. That's why I called the technique "risky."

[@bonghalee]

sensei... Thank you so much for saving this poor soul

[@carlkarlson2175]

Thanks for this! I’ll see you in court.

[@lizellenelson5355]

Thanks!

[@insightlsat]

Thanks so much! Good luck preparing!

[@futuraxz]

Hi. For the Conditional Sorting (In/out) game, how do you diagram a rule like if F is in, both H and G out. I try to diagram it but my diagram is really messy and I cannot follow the arrows anymore.

[@r.p.8906]

32:00 amazing tip!

[@roseb2105]

it would be very helpful if someone can post of a video of this style of question but involving a real worl law situation with solllution and explanation etc

[@madewithlove6787]

for @52:20 , the condition was that if f patrols westlak, eastman patrols terry. Shouldn't F be in the westlak and eastman be in the terry?

[@camillawestbrooke3475]

Question. Is D always going to be out? I got it from the contrapostives the soups game

[@r.p.8906]

1:18:00 how did you assume that we need on vendor and one marketing assistant in each city.? I do not see this in the description. I guess we could assume this, but it is not stated.

[@roseb2105]

I think you with the exttra dimension question it should have clarified in the begining that each area will have 2 DIFFERENT TYPES of volunteer without that it impossible to know what must be true or false etc unless new information is given

[@viksaluja1]

#20 extra dimension 1:32:00 - please explain how A is incorrect if you placed L in V and D in M

[@roseb2105]

regarding the question 8 on the patrol officers if h is in t doesnt that also set of a chain reaction in that it forces e and g into w and then the only thing left is f and d which would be forced into t?

[@ListenAndImagine]

Thank you, you are doing gods work! lol

[@karechiawarthon9473]

Do you do online tutoring??? Is so what is a good way to connect with you?

[@amybigbruda]

Question about the conditional sorting/in and out diagram. How would u diagram conditional rules that are and/or? For example. The rule said if kale is chosen then garlic is chosen (or sum like that). What if it were to say " if kale is chosen then garlic is chosen or endive is chosen but not both". What then?

[@elanreisner4180]

for conditional sorting, it states that if barley is chosen than F cannot be chosen. But if D is chosen than CB is chosen which creates the contradictory statement that C must allow F and B cannot allow F. Can you please clarify this conditional sorting example?

[@dominicpatrick2617]

How can I tell when it's asking for contrapositive versus converse? How will I know which to assume?

[@calebmundle452]

very helpful. LSAT in April! wish me luck

[@Paperclips4782]

I'm writing mine tomorrow! You'll do great, good luck :)

[@davids.8816]

@@Paperclips4782 How did it go!

[@Paperclips4782]

@@davids.8816 it went ok. I blanked o logic games which was where I was most confident on :/ I'm writing in August:)

[@tatianaboutros9100]

after i finish these lessons, what tests do i drill ??

[@joshuatmorton5716]

1:35:22 G has to be a particular type of assistant. F and H also have to be the same type, not necessarily G's type. However because E and L are different types of assistants, one of them will also be grouped with F and H. This rules out F and H being the same type as G. put differently, G and D MUST be of the same assistant variety. That CANNOT happen if G is assigned to Portland. But all that is assuming each city gets one type of assistant which I didn't get from the initial text lol

[@ajmalr4790]

yea that kinda confused me by not making the type of assistant clear

[@edgunther8136]

Each city getting only one type of assistant is nothing more than an assumption. No good for LSAT prep.

[@samdavisok]

God bless you

[@TheHG12]

Easier way to think of the first one. Make worlds! If P or T has to be in Wax make two worlds. One with P and one with T and fill them out with the rules as much as possible. Same for Yes being either T or U. You only need to make 3 worlds. world 1= P in Wax and T in Yas. World 2= P in Wax and U in Yas (this world will be completely filled out with all 7 elements). World 3= T in Wax and U in Yas.

[@jessmateljan5717]

Hi there, firstly you videos are incredible. Thank you so much for providing so much information & assistance! I have a question - 1:16:30(ish) - do we make the inference that one volunteer has to be M & one volunteer has to be V? Thanks!

[@judezhu5364]

Hi! I have the same question. Do you have the answer yet?

[@salmon9950]

same question here. I kept looking at the question and the rules and couldn't find that

[@JCPanthers8]

Had the same question! That wasn't clear to me and threw me off a bit.

[@gabrieladimitrova3676]

Hi, min 56:20 - aren’t answers C and E the same as well logically speaking just like A and B? Thank you for clarifying

[@peggymolloy6367]

I like the dumb names, proves there is still some humor left!

[@ajaxm13]

In the *Extra Dimension* variation, I follow all of the logic and sample questions. However, why do we assume the *V & M* layers? It does not stipulate in the set up that two different volunteer types are required. I get it is assumed for the purposes of the questions, but why?

[@roxannekinnally4208]

I try to read a lot and watch the logic games over and over again

[@Irrirriii]

Do you have any group prep courses?

[@judezhu5364]

1:16:28 Hi! May I ask how do we know that each event needs to be staffed by an M and a V? The setup doesn't say this, so do we just make that assumption?

[@jackalope101]

Had the same exact problem with this one. I didn't see why two m and two v could be at each event

[@joseoviedo4529]

Hi, yes you are correct in that we need the necessary assumption that each event require one of each type of assistant. This would make a good test question don't you think? lol.

[@connorpriest5469]

I have the exact same question. It seems like for this one we need to make that assumption.... but my question is... can we make this same kind of assumption for all questions of this type?

[@connorpriest5469]

@@joseoviedo4529 But does the LSAT actually do this? I would probably have gotten many of the questions for this particular game wrong because the instructions didn't say that one of each type of staff goes to every event.

[@edgunther8136]

This must be a bad question. I doubt (hope) the real LSAT would require you to make such an assumption.

[@cekatoo]

How do I access the practice tests?

[@chrisgames6044]

Awesome videos, really helpful. Question. At 36.20, why isn't answer D also valid. Since P,Q,S,and U would be at Zest, but P or U has to be in Wax or Yas. Thanks for the clarification.

[@insightlsat]

Remember that the question is asking you to find something that MUST BE FALSE. That means wrong answers COULD BE TRUE. I'll give you the solution in a moment, but just on your own try making D true. Put P and S in W and try to place the rest of the elements without betraying any rules. It will work out fine, and that means the answer choice does not need to be false. --- Anyway... hope you were able to do that yourself, but here's the solution. P and S go in W. This brings in Q and U, since we have PQ and SU chunks. Since we need either T or U in Y, we need to choose T, because U is already in W. All that is left is K and M. And we need to have two elements in Z, so both K and M go there. So we're left with (W): PQSU; (Y):T; (Z):KM. Every element is placed, no rules are broken. D can be crossed off.

[@chrisgames6044]

Alright, I got it now. Misread the answer. Thanks for the response!

[@mayowaolatunde568]

what was your score on the lsat??? I find your videos very useful, but as we all know time is not ones friend. Is there a way where you can do a few logic game examples at your test speed to give your audience a sense of how fast this can be done

[@emilydevlin2554]

the description says he got a 179 but seeing it done quickly like after the breaks everything down would really help, or go over the homework questions fast at the end

[@r.p.8906]

1:11:00 I LOVE IT!!

[@tonistarks23]

Question Doc. @4:26 when you asked us to question how about a maximum number of Djs each club could book, how did you arrive at 5 for your max number of Djs per club and not 7 ? 🤔

[@escapewithtravelplannetpro4047]

Hi Toni. Max is 5 because each club has at least 1 DJ. That was one of the rules. After you put 1 in W & 1 in Y, you have 5 left over for the last club, Z.

[@edgunther8136]

At 1:16:25 you assert that "in each event we're going to have an 'm' and a 'v,'" but I see nothing in the prompt which leads you to create such an assumption

[@madisonmorrissette348]

Help needed: in the extra dimensions example, no where does it say that there must be one m and one v at each location. How did you draw that inference?

[@carltonpowers]

Also wondering the same thing.

[@AndSuchIsLife]

@@carltonpowers In the question overview it stated that "Each event is staffed by two volunteers". This helps us to draw the inference that there were only two locations for the six volunteers to go. We then can draw an inference from this because each of the six volunteer had to be trained as either a marketing assistant or a vendor assistant. We can make the inference that at each location there must be one m and one v because only two volunteers could work at the location. I hope this helps.

[@luffyd.monkey7171]

check the comments below, he already answered this question from his personal account. it was a mistake in the question wording.

[@pariss9983]

Hey, a quick question for game 2, I'd really appreciate if you could reply. If E is in T group, could F also be in that group? Like, does that trigger the F---> E rule?

[@ltob86]

I also had this question for the Terry/Westlake game. My diagram was essentially EG -> FH and the contrapositive as FH -> EG where L had to be in W and D had to be in T (it wasn't actually a floater because that's actually the only place it could go).

[@ltob86]

I think that our reasoning is correct in this very specific case because there were only 3 spots for each and every spot had to be filled and there's no doubling. But in general, it may be dangerous to make this inference. The next question (the ingredients) actually showed me the flaw in our reasoning regarding game 2, because in the ingredients game (game 3) if K is in then G is in, and if G is out, then K is out, but it does NOT necessarily mean that if G is in K necessarily has to be in or that if K is out, G has to be out.

[@Gizm4445]

If f yields e , then no e yields no f. It doesn’t promise that e will yield f tho.

[@brittanybutts4529]

I had one question while doing a practice test. It said something like: There are 7 employees, A, B, C, D, E, F, G. One will get the raise. Here are the rules. Wait, what? I didn't have a clue how to set up the diagram for that!

[@multiplsarcasms9199]

The diagram for the extra dimensions is not finished from the start. G must be under V leaving 2 spots. 1 of those 2 spots must be either E or L. Leaving F and H to be under the M category. That’s why it was harder to figure out. Once you take that extra step all the questions were easy.

[@Gizm4445]

G under Vendor doesn’t leave 2 spots for V. The question did not emphasize the volunteers had to be 3 vendors and 3 marketers.

[@jamiehoran2552]

Thank you for developing this and putting it out there. I bought the book you referenced, but must have a different edition. Mine has print number 13 12 11 10 (found on the bottom left corner of the page opposite the table of contents). What is yours? Thx again.

[@insightlsat]

I'm currently traveling and won't have access to my copy of the book for a little while, but if the page numbers don't match up, the test-section-question numbers still will, so just go by that.

[@dismfcooked]

You missed an inference. F and H cannot be in the vendor row because G must be there, If you had those three in that row you could not do the E - L rule. F and H can only be in the top row (m) with either e or l, nothing else

[@truth4517]

at 1:37:37. E and A are both right answers. If L is in Portland Both E & L would need 2 be in portland otherwise that would break the vertical relationship of E&L. No? However the rule states that D must be in Portland????

[@thomaspaul]

A is incorrect. He shows how to do it: Top Row: L H F. Bottom Row: D E G

[@rowdy5583]

E and L don't have to be in a vertical relationship, they just cannot be in a horizontal relationship.

[@r.p.8906]

52:00 I got F must be patrolling W, because of rule 4, still same answer but much faster. :)

[@andrewd3525]

At 1:08:16 why is E a wrong answer? I thought you could not have garlic without Kale and vice a versa. Could someone please explain this to me?

[@TimBefore25]

Sure. K brings in G. That does not mean G brings in K. In other words, K is sufficient to have G, but K is not necessary to have G. In even MORE words, lol... G is necessary to bring in K, but G is not sufficient to bring in K.

[@christianthomas9521]

for the fixed number example how is "F" more connected or influential than "H?"

[@MyNameIsJ3ffrey]

Because if H is in Westlake, you can still have 2 possible assignments. T: EGF W: HLD or T: EGF W: LHF F can be with GE in T. The rule says if F is in W, GE has to be in T. H doesn’t conclusively determine that.

[@RRRRobbbb]

1:53:30 Hybrid Sequencing and Sorting I'm not sure if you pointed out explicitly that the order of the interviewees on a given day doesn't matter (i.e., their arrangement within a vertical column), and I'm not about to re-watch half an hour of this video to confirm that, but it's an important thing to remember if you're using the "framing" strategy. I spent about 20 minutes racking my brain and shouting at my laptop that there are more than 3 possibilities to arrange the letters (i.e., F can be in any of the 3 positions in the 3rd column) before realizing that it doesn't affect the outcome of the game. Feel free to make fun of me in the comments. I'm sure I'm not the only one though.

[@bryanarnold155]

The chart strategy you used here does NOT work well for problem on page 213. Does anyone have a different recommendation?

[@Jessica-vg2vw]

oh my god thank you

[@bryanarnold155]

@@Jessica-vg2vw you can make like a little path of each element. tbh that is one of the harder games. I have seen AR sections from over 65 PT. Randsborough or whatever is was called was a b*****

[@laurasolomon1522]

36:12 D is the right answer and E can not be as K is a floater.

[@yuanzhibao9816]

why each city has to have two different types of volunteers? Why can't two V volunteers in one city? I dont understand this part..

[@LD5260]

did anyone else compeltly understand conditional sorting in his example but then got to the HW problems for conditional sorting and were completely lost as in completely wrong and confused????

[@shivanigoyal1202]

For the main example at the beginning, why couldn't W have P/Q and Y have U/S? Why does T have to be in one of those? It doesn't state that T MUST be in one or the other - just that it's an either/or scenario with P/T in one category and T/U in another category, so why couldn't T be in the final category, Z?

[@bryanarnold155]

Great observation, tom actually could be booked at Z. He is just writing P/T and T/U to let you know they these elements can not be booked together. T can be with M&K at Zest. If T is booked at Zest then you know P must be booked at Wax and U must be booked at Yas. Hope this helped

[@georgeabraham9438]

why can't it be w2 y2 and z3?

[@henrybethell1503]

why can't T be in Z? U and P could be in Y and W, respectively.

[@TheMasterjohn99]

55:30 - fixing number sorting - (E) also fills the positions in , why is E not the answer but (C) is ??!! - if h is in westlake then g in t and and e in t, if e is in t then f is in W. Putting D in T

[@kk-qy4sh]

Hey, I think this may help you understand why E is wrong. While H being in Westlake would make you put G and E in Terry, you cannot assume that F is in Westlake. The rule is: if F is in Westlake, E is in Terry. The contrapositive to that is: if E is not in Terry, F is not in Westlake. In other words (considering that there is only two group options, some books call this the "limited options rule"), if E is in Westlake, then F is in Terry. If E is in Terry, you cannot infer based on the rule and its contrapositive that F will be in Westlake. Remember you can't assume the sufficient condition from the necessary condition. Thus, placing H in Westlake would not complete our diagram. G and E would be in Terry, but we do not know if D or F could fill the final two slots (remember, the rule does not say that E and F cannot be in the same park)! Hope this helped! :)

[@rowdy5583]

Basically, when a rule goes one way (when F is in Westlake, E is in Terry) it does not mean (E is in Terry, F is in Westlake) A contrapositive does not make something Opposite, it means it (Could be) opposite.

[@parkerellis6680]

Kelly thank you for the explanation. Very helpful.

[@fritzkreig1314]

Why couldn't it be 3 for W 1 for Y and 3 for Z?

[@Ubeqween]

Yas Queenie

[@sfinnable]

1:13:28 .... do u mean Quebec City

[@laurasolomon1522]

1:34:43 my diagram the same as urs 😁

[@laurasolomon1522]

👍. This LG should be the first to start the LSAT with , for relaxation and attention purposes.

[@beatsthattalk6690]

You're good thanks. Now buy a smart pen or whatever they're called :p

[@dominicpatrick2617]

22:38 wtf ? 2(E) can be correct, where | T | S | P | | | U | Q | | | | | Am I wrong?!?...

[@countvronsky3328]

Hi! Yes this is wrong. This would not be correct as we need to remember the numbers, and that we added a new condition: that Y

[@chasegunner9719]

I dont understand how you came to the conclusion that if carrots are out then duck is out. Carrots still could be in if ham is chosen.

[@chasegunner9719]

nvm i got it

[@As_Sulay]

🗑️ℹ even💭📂📑 29:37

[@brandonmcneal8873]

Why did he make the assumption that there needs to be one marketing assistant and one vendor assistant in each city? Does not say this nor imply this in any part of the question...

[@brandonmcneal8873]

1:17:00 Not in any of the conditions either so this is either a flawed question or flawed logic on his part... sad to see

[@ajmalr4790]

anyone else registered for august 2021?

[@rrvisions-rickyruthejew]

1:59:17 why do you have the picture of the confederate soldier sitting there at the end of the video? This was a trap to anger black peoples who want to study law… smh This was supposed to be unrelated educational material in the video… Instead… It’s like reading a Winnie the Pooh book to your children and seeing a picture of Christoper Robin smoking crack on the last page…

[@supriseimblack]

Get back on your meds