Demonstrating diffraction using laser light - for teachers

[@cynagye2096]

Looking at how he is explaining makes me love physics

[@hoofheartedicemelted296]

The difference between college and university level learning is in university level you are "reading" whatever subject matter, so in effect you are teaching yourself. Where as in college the teacher is teaching you, relaying the information and laying it all out for you and hopefully simplifying the subject matter as much as possible. I asked my brother how is it you have taught yourself to use cubase which at the time, many years ago, there was no tutorials for it. He said "if you have a passion for something, you will have eagerness to learn and it will be absorbed much easier". Well I have a passion for optics, but I'm still baffled and this teacher has made perfect sense. I'm struggling with a lot of the subject matter so diverse is it, but what he just explained was easy to absorb and made sense. Sometimes you just need the best teacher. The institute is blessed to have him. I am currently reading a book I bought called "Optics The Science of Light". It also has the IOP mark on it, and it's a fascinating read. But God what I'd give for someone to explain it in videos like the video above. I wish that this subject was available when I was at school. I think my life would have turned out quite differently indeed. Thank you good teacher for passing on this knowledge of physics and the science of light.

[@Mufti199]

Such a brilliant experiment! I'm definitely integrating in this in my class

[@lorentz1617]

Definite integration 🙄

[@kalitgautam]

The most beautiful Diffraction video I have seen till date !!!

[@LuvinaMacondo]

Thanks! That's what I was looking for.

[@bethevers6391]

Thank you so much for a lovely demonstration to use in class.

[@maxheadrom3088]

I did it using two razors to form a slit. Excellent video!

[@pinacolarusso]

This is a brilliant video. Short, rigorous yet fun!

[@nikorahmad]

Im a physics teacher from Indonesia and i love it.. 👍

[@SuperBhavanishankar]

Hello sir

[@nikorahmad]

@@SuperBhavanishankar hello..

[@applesweet55]

His calmness eases my physics anxiety

[@fatimamir2006]

Thank you Sir It was so interesting and easy to understand with more focus

[@exoplanet11]

Thanks. A much better video than the old one MIT has up on the topic. Modern and conceptual. I am using this video for my physics students at San Francisco State Univ.

[@arvind7820]

Great Explanation sir. 🙏 🙏. The most aprecite thing is the quality of the images.

[@Spoder_07]

His voice is so soothing, it made me forget I'm seeing this for homework

[@physicslelo7614]

Amazing style to teach and demonstrate.. loved it

[@gaminghoodies6369]

youre the best thank youuuu i understood it finally physics is so interesting when you know whats happening

[@nikhilgarg2929]

2:32 u will be able to see difraction

[@jerichobauner5914]

THANK YOU! FOR THIS! :))

[@nikhilgarg2929]

@@jerichobauner5914wlc

[@jerichobauner5914]

@@nikhilgarg2929 E

[@padmalathaumesh5590]

Very beautifully explained, experiment is demonstrated so well, tku sir

[@parithimathi]

Excellent demo. Thanks. I'll use it in my class

[@vijaykumarmagar4712]

Very well demonstrated! Thanks.

[@ARCSTREAMS]

ok i understand that constructive interference creates a double amplitude thus brighter light is that correct? and destructive creates no light as the throughs cancel but what about when there are different semi constructive or semi destructive phases 1/4, 1/2 etc where do these appear? are they the bands of light that are less bright and why are these happening further to the sides away from the middle? the same constructive patterns happen away from centre as well but why are those less bright though? also if we have a collimated beam of white light will there still be refraction and interference only it wont be creating fringes because there is a jungle of different light frequencies ? if so how come they still cast a near perfect shadow of whatever you put in front of this beam for quite a long distance before it blurs of fades away?

[@ebenezergeorge68]

Excellent demonstration and explanation. However, I'm still confused by the absence of a shadow

[@theVO1D31]

When you are truly in love with physics, you speak like this ⬆

[@kurshidulalamlaskar8744]

Thanks to you for clearing my doubts regarding this topics

[@sheetalarya9669]

Amazing Sir 🔥 Love and Respect from India 😊

[@syedhasnainahmed9097]

Excellent 👌 Without double slit or diffraction grating

[@JordanLynch-o9c]

So we cant see a line down the middle in this example. However we can see the shadow off planets infront off stars many light years away?

[@bhigurammahato7228]

Im looking for this Explaination

[@michelecutini1503]

Excellent work, well done!!

[@rasheduddin8811]

loved this video presentation. awesome!

[@NikitaNair]

Amazing explanation!!

[@odal6770]

@Michael Podesta I wonder what one would see if one replaced the screen with a mirror? The circular spot of the laser and the wire? Or the same pattern as with the screen?

[@Rohitsingh-dg1oj]

Sir what will happen if we project 2 laser together Will it show interference

[@maxheadrom3088]

Well, there's interference but it's likely not visible because I don't think you can guarantee that every photon will be produced with a 90 degree phase difference. When the laser goes through the wire it forms something like circular waves on each side of the wire - with the same phase - and it's the interference between these two "sources" that produce the pattern. Huygens, when he proposed the wave nature of light, designed an experiment using a thin hole that should produce circular pattern of interference. A video showing waves in water: kzbin.info/www/bejne/b5jYmnlnabOKprs A simulation of the double slit experiment in water (each side of the wire behaves like on slit): kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZpTdpXygZtJqm5Y Hole electron diffraction from an Australian school: kzbin.info/www/bejne/g5qscqGufr9-h9E

[@pham9479]

you can search Michelson interferometer

[@dadagdadig5344]

Thankyou sir , I was just looking for this explanation.

[@mukeshwathore12]

Amazing explaination 🔥

[@odal6770]

@Michael de Podesta did you ever spray the space between the laser and the screen after you had placed the wire? Did you see that light rays were reaching out to the screen, the way the central beam did? I think they do not and that is quite a puzzle. How do the reflections get on the screen if there was no impact other than that of the central beam? I would really appreciate it if you would react to this comment. Even if it is to show that I am completely wrong. If I could I would build the same setup as yours, but I am not very handy I'm afraid.

[@razz6475]

Woww.. that would be interesting to explore. Thanks.

[@odal6770]

@@razz6475 Please let me know what you find out.

[@odal6770]

@@razz6475 kzbin.info/www/bejne/rJDYc5R4qsale68 The beam certainly is not as wide as the pattern on the screen, is it?

[@razz6475]

@@odal6770 yeah it isn't. The lady tried to explain using the arrows, which almost seems like divergence of electric field from a point source. Anyway really appreciate the comment.

[@apusingh1967]

is diffraction a proof of uncertainty principle?

[@suchismitabehera5783]

Thank you so much sir.a great respect to you sir.explain the experiment nicely.

[@-MikaelaWuisan]

Thank you Sir. It really helped me understand:) Have a good day..

[@odal6770]

What would happen if you brought the wire very close to the screen? Would we then see a shadow of the wire?

[@navneetkr.1192]

Thnx, it was more helpful than one may think.😁

[@ag887s]

Thank you for the explanation ❤

[@jeenasubedi22]

Is this possible in normal room? Or need a dark room?

[@daydreams9113]

"For teachers" *me watching for fun* ;-;

[@jaansayyed8632]

You really deserve more likes 👏👏

[@iamvanshchauhan]

Brilliant experiment

[@saritapal-dk4lg]

Simply explained👌👌👌

[@genmckenna3718]

brilliant ..beautifully explain..thank you

[@sharad7340]

Thanks my physics teacher used it for teaching

[@physarif]

Great explanation.

[@ecwg8512]

Dr. Chan rise up

[@gijoraj623]

Wonderful wonderful explanation

[@ritazaghar8304]

est ce que vous pouvez faire la traduction en francais

[@hugohidalgoherencia5241]

What happens if you do it with 2 wires ?

[@delete7316]

I would guess that you'd have more pronounced dots with larger spaces between them due to more sources of interference. It would only be very slight and not easily visible to be different. If you want to see what would happen if there were loads of wires, look up diffraction gratings.

[@mahirhasan9212]

This is awesome 💚

[@shadowmonarch8304]

This is amazing!

[@sandhya41a5]

Thank you so much sir ❣

[@lovenaturechannel8080]

i dont think so where is slit??? single slit or double where is

[@joeplana]

The pattern would disappear if you blocked one side of the divider.. would that be right? And equally if we marked the photons in some way to determine which side they travelled. It is essentially the same as a double slit experiment... or is there a significant difference?

[@jamilurrahman6360]

Wonderful 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[@AdityaTiwari-rj8wg]

GOAT 🫵🐐

[@lepidoptera9337]

You want to expose the wave nature of light? Look at an oil film on water or press two glass plates against each other (microscope slides will do fine). No laser necessary.

[@cslloyd1]

Feynman says light is not a wave at all, only a particle. He would have used QED and Feynman diagrams to explain this and would say QED is the most precise/correct theory in the history of science. Why do we keep talking about waves?

[@lepidoptera9337]

Because what Feynman means when he talks about particles are actually quanta. Quanta only exist wherever there is an irreversible energy transfer between an electromagnetic field and an external system. The notion of a quantum within the em field itself is unworkable (it leads to the well known problems with physical realism). It is also complete unnecessary. You do have to understand, though, that these details do not matter to Feynman because the formalisms of QED and QFT in general are taking care of this automatically (and so does the Copenhagen interpretation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics). As a theorist who is mostly concerned with predicting high energy physics phenomena he can allow himself to gloss over these details and it does not hurt his ability to make solid physical predictions. If you are more interested in the structure of quantum mechanics than actual physics (like the standard model), then you have to develop a somewhat refined sense for how you want to talk about these things. When you do, however, you will quickly realize that this refinement is mostly cosmetic. It doesn't allow us to make any physical predictions that do not also pop out of Feynman's crude way of talking about these things in the particle language of the high energy physicist. It's pretty much all just icing on the physics cake, if you like.

[@bravedelchannel5067]

Thank you for explaining. You saved my day.hahahha

[@rakesharora7714]

Thanks a lot

[@robertwilsoniii2048]

This is awesome. It seems super obvious after spraying the lazer beam with water that it is a wave. You can see the oscillating photon partials moving towards the paper. I guess hitting hair causes the photons to scatter and bounce, I assume the same damn thing happens to water particles if you interfere with water waves.

[@n4v33nkum4r7]

This is basically Charlie Puth teaching me physics😳😳

[@Dashing_dev_18]

Physics works ❤

[@harshitmishra3622]

Ha bhai DPS Gr.noida ka kon kon aya hai yaha pe 😂😂😂😂😂

[@mugdhomugdho3013]

The producer is a BENGALI

[@fititocom]

i like to use two tangled hairs to do the same

[@fikirbirhanu5983]

thank a lot

[@anujmalik7887]

I am studying this in my class 12 [India] . Sometimes i feel like i am a scientist xd .

[@archanasengar2854]

He looks like Christopher Nolan

[@varshakhadilkar1646]

Who all are jee aspirants here

[@mechanicsforigcse524]

very very nice

[@mayankpunai7093]

I am a student of FE4 batch any one here from GCI

[@DrAnkitJangid]

Ok

[@yerragudisivamohanredy8160]

Super 😙

[@atangreid4270]

Science class has me like 😴

[@SuperBhavanishankar]

For me history class is like 😴

[@blackbuildinc]

Light. Light? Electromagnetic Radiation? Electromagnetic Waves? Light? There is so much more too light than science. If we are light, and everything is light why is it here and where did it come from? Why can it can have a momentum but not have a mass? You need a mass and a direction to create momentum...

[@gregoralexander1856]

Although it may be seemingly deceiving that an object needs to have mass to hold momentum, this isn’t the case at relativistic velocities as photons of light have energy in the electromagnetic form and since E=mc^2, energy means mass and therefore momentum

[@cynagye2096]

Normally I don't lol

[@martinalber5054]

Excelent.. next step: now use a 400nm laser and 2 wires, one 100nm diameter and another of 600nm diameter, see waht happens..

[@jamesanonymous2343]

CURIOS TO KNOW,,,IF LIGHT IS A WAVE, AS APPOSED TO A PARTICLE, WHAT ARE IT'S (WAVE), CONSTITUENT PARTS ?

[@mdshimul1504]

Thank you sir

[@mdshimul1504]

🇧🇩

[@neerajpathak1600]

India🇮🇳 ❤

[@jamesanonymous2343]

IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN GETTING TO KNOW HEISENBERG AND HIS THEORY, THIS GUY WILL GET YOU STARTED IN THE RIGHT PLACE,,,AND THE RIGHT DIRECTION ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,GOOD LUCK ! THANKS,,,,INSTITUTE !