Instrument Traverse Nomogram (номограмма инструментального хода) Review / HowTo

  Рет қаралды 17,084

Chris Staecker

Chris Staecker

6 жыл бұрын

The instrument traverse nomogram, made in the 1980s in the USSR. This is an english version of the номограмма инструментального хода.
This is episode 34 of my video series about calculating devices.
End song inspired by "Hotter Than a Molotov" by The Coup.
Chris Staecker webarea: cstaecker.fairfield.edu/~cstae...

Пікірлер: 50
@pafnutiytheartist
@pafnutiytheartist 2 жыл бұрын
Explanation for Паспорт 2.317.002 ПС: Passport for an product, usually a tool means technical documentation, specifying what it does what capabilities it has, possibly what patents it uses and what standards it meets. Not particularly interesting, unless you have access to Soviet product passport databases or need your equipment to meet certain Soviet standards.
@drleroux9876
@drleroux9876 2 жыл бұрын
Interesting time to get recommended this.
@12...
@12... 6 жыл бұрын
That alternate system of angles (starting at the top and going clockwise) has a lot of advantages. For one thing, it's more intuitive since it works just like a clock. And it makes trig functions nicer. TAN(angle) is now x/y rather than y/x, for instance.
@mygills3050
@mygills3050 2 жыл бұрын
Tan not being hypotenuse slope? Weird. I mean, I understand, but weird.
@qxtr5853
@qxtr5853 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for doing the research on russian pronunciation and all of that! Most creators don't bother and just go with gut feeling.
@JohnHoranzy
@JohnHoranzy 3 жыл бұрын
Just found one on eBay for $30, shipping included from Poland. Will be nice in my collection. Thanks for the post and all the Trig information about this.
@FlyingBoxHead
@FlyingBoxHead 2 жыл бұрын
Much like the aircrafts and some other equipment exported to other soviet-aligned countries; things like instrument panels, warnings, and literature were printed/produced in English as it was a common trade language making it cheaper and less tedious to get out to their friends in the field. Likely is the case here.
@Maazin5
@Maazin5 5 жыл бұрын
Binge watching all your videos. Love your narration! Funny, informative, and creative
@tombouie
@tombouie 2 жыл бұрын
Thks, I likes the way you convey complex/cryptic subjects so concisely/clearly to regular folks. Oh !Look-Up-Tables Rule!
@ChrisStaecker
@ChrisStaecker 2 жыл бұрын
Look-up tables are seriously underrated. My favorite is the Monkey Multiplier.
@herosstratos
@herosstratos 2 жыл бұрын
The full circle of 6000 units (~ 2 × pi × 1000) was used in Warsaw-Pact military, 6400 mils are used in Nato countries. N. b.: It was common for Soviet artillery officers to have notches in their cap visors for measuring heading angles.
@BillRicker
@BillRicker Жыл бұрын
YES. And Sweden used 6300 to not be same as either noisy neighbor. I have a couple items in NATO Mils and a couple in WARPAC Mils. I need to get a Swedish 6300 protractor or something to complete my set of Instruments of Math Instruction.
@dancoroian1
@dancoroian1 2 жыл бұрын
Great Russian pronunciation! I was impressed given that you seem to be American
@ChrisStaecker
@ChrisStaecker 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I’m from Boston, but I spent some time in Kazakhstan.
@RobleViejo
@RobleViejo 2 жыл бұрын
@@ChrisStaecker What do you think of the current situation? Will the megalomaniacs riding nukes on both sides kill us all? Im South American and Im more afraid of a Nuclear Holocaust than most United Statesians, In social networks they are literally asking for nukes. Is insane, people think this is a movie or something....
@ChrisStaecker
@ChrisStaecker 2 жыл бұрын
@@RobleViejo No predictions about what will happen, but I believe nuclear armament by the USA and USSR was one of the great moral failings in our history. In the USA it's mostly left the public eye, but these systems which are capable of destroying everything are very much still operational.
@yep_2431
@yep_2431 2 жыл бұрын
Your channel is such a hidden gem. It should of blown up for real, you're hilarious bro
@evilfish456
@evilfish456 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you algorithm gods! These kind of videos are heroin to my mind!
@rogerrabbit80
@rogerrabbit80 2 жыл бұрын
All Hail Algorithm, the Great and Powerful!
@someonespadre
@someonespadre Жыл бұрын
In Land Surveying calculations Y is North, and X is east. At least in the US there are 4 quadrants, angles are measured from north or south, examples: N 45° E, S 45° E, S 45° W, N 45° W (quadrant bearings). This simplified figuring reverse directions before calculators. S 45° W is 180° from N 45° E. We use degrees, minutes and seconds. The Y coordinate is called Northing, the X coordinate is called Easting. The difference between 2 Eastings is called departure, the difference between Northings is called latitude. Cosine bearing times horizontal distance equals latitude, Sine bearing times horizontal distance equals departure. It looks like this machine has a precision of 1 meter which is probably good enough for artillery. It looks like the angles are divided down to 0.05 BDP which is about 0.30° or 18 minutes of arc (52 cm at 100M). Usually graphic scales are interpolated to half their marks so about 0.5M and 0.025 BPD. I bet it could be used in reverse, knowing the coordinates of the target (which they do by triangulation from 2 points) and coordinates of the gun you could read direction and distance gun to target.
@BillRicker
@BillRicker Жыл бұрын
in different eras, the US Coast Artillery Corps and allied portions of CoE used North 0° and South 0° azimuths ! ( Coast Artillery had different X,Y grid projections that standard Army maps as well because of their peculiar needs.)
@roedergk
@roedergk 9 ай бұрын
I love these videos!
@tensortab8896
@tensortab8896 2 жыл бұрын
Looks a bit like the aiming circle we used for aiming mortars back in the 70s.
@DaveMeuleman
@DaveMeuleman 2 жыл бұрын
Can't believe I just found your channel! Cheers from a fellow math lover!
@saasrus
@saasrus 2 жыл бұрын
I was really surprised to see soviet piece of splendor on this channel. I can't believe in 21th sentry someone calculated that war is profitable. Life of regular person never cost much in such calculations.
@Matthew-ju3nk
@Matthew-ju3nk 2 жыл бұрын
Dude! You find some of the coolest stuff! And, as a child of the 80s myself, I found this presentation particularly funny. I am a civil engineer and I have always had great appreciation for the old-school ways of doing things. I was introduced to nomograph‘s back in college and I have had a great appreciation for these mechanical/graphical/rule-of-thumb methodologies ever since. Rock on! One other observation: do you think those odd Russian units around the compass are designation of minutes as used in navigation? That would seem to make sense to me.
@deezynar
@deezynar 2 жыл бұрын
It does trigonometric calculations. Jerome S. Meyer (b.1895 - d.1975) was an American who wrote prolifically on many subjects, including mathematics, throughout the middle of the twentieth century. Mr. Meyer invented a chart that's very similar to this one and was published in two of his books. Its first appearance was in "Fun With Mathematics", published in 1952. It was also included in "More Fun With Mathematics", 1963. The chart provides a very graphic way to solve trigonometric problems.
@ChrisStaecker
@ChrisStaecker 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the tip- I'll check it out
@BillRicker
@BillRicker Жыл бұрын
@@ChrisStaecker as i mentioned in email recently, part of the utility of mils in the field is making small angle trig easy, it's mental arithmetic. φ (mils) * range (kilometres) = offset (metres) thanks to the sin φ = φ (radians) small-angle approximation, with km:1000m ratio and 2×π both being baked into the 6400 mils in a circle ≅ 2×π×10³. This device is a nomographic calculator for large angle mils trigonometry (in WAR-PAC 6000 mils ≅2×π Radians ) and direct-reading Pythagorean x²+y²=z² (wherein it's similar to the E-6B Flight Computer (2D Slide-rule) used in aviation for dead-reckoning from the 1930s to present, and also seen in ST:TOS!) (It is i fear little known outside of 1930s-1960s EE circles, the fact that many trig sliderules can be (ab)used to do X,Y ↔ r, θ transforms with nearly direct reading; but this них and E-B6 are indeed easier if bulkier.) I'm wondering if the instructions describe using it WITH an Instrument on a Traverse, or describe using its arm as the gnomon/alidade of a Plane Table to fully do the traverse without optical instrument? I would expect a ridge or pop-up sights on the arm if the latter, so i'm presuming this is an accessory for a Theodolite, Aiming Circle, or BCT.
@capolaya
@capolaya 6 жыл бұрын
The compass thing divides 360 degrees like on an analog clock would do. So maybe that is the reason on using these special units? Oh, and First.
@ChrisStaecker
@ChrisStaecker 6 жыл бұрын
I think it was for easy interoperability with milliradians. Wikipedia has a decent article about this, and the difference between NATO and Warsaw Pact units. But I didn't want to get into that in the video.
@amoledzeppelin
@amoledzeppelin Жыл бұрын
IRL, I heard these BDPs referred to as just "minutes", because there are 60 of them. And 5 "minutes" is an "hour", because there are 12 of them in the circle.
@ChrisStaecker
@ChrisStaecker Жыл бұрын
Sounds reasonable- I've never heard anything about them really.
@cogwheel42
@cogwheel42 2 жыл бұрын
The first time you said НИХ, I thought exactly what you showed later
@sidmarx7276
@sidmarx7276 2 жыл бұрын
We precalculate observable stars at twilight with a clumsy and inaccurate HO 2021 "Starfinder." I was forced to part with my simpler and more elegant Croatian "Identifikator Zviezda" which has only one revolving disc. This shows both hemispheres by displaying stars in red or blue respectively, and shows every available star. Bulkier but also elegant is the Russian "star globe," a boxed model of the celestial sphere.
@xtusvincit5230
@xtusvincit5230 Жыл бұрын
What if you called BDPs minutes?
@MoonRock-ij8ni
@MoonRock-ij8ni 2 жыл бұрын
can you not recommend these videos to me at 120 am please. I can't stop
@Xsiondu
@Xsiondu Жыл бұрын
A bulletproof nomogram is very useful in America.
@spinecho609
@spinecho609 2 жыл бұрын
are you from the american midwest?
@ChrisStaecker
@ChrisStaecker 2 жыл бұрын
Boston!
@OprichnikStyle
@OprichnikStyle 2 жыл бұрын
i bet they're still using it today
@MarvelDcImage
@MarvelDcImage 4 жыл бұрын
Why in English? Anyone?
@icecreamsundae1038
@icecreamsundae1038 2 жыл бұрын
Well not everyone knows Russian, I suppose.
@gustavgnoettgen
@gustavgnoettgen 2 жыл бұрын
Maybe it's an international version, for soviet countries that didn't speak Russian themselves. But I guess then it shouldn't be uncommon for soviet military gear in general?
@svejksoldjer
@svejksoldjer 2 жыл бұрын
@@icecreamsundae1038 military aid exports for africa, maybe - 1987...
@ElKudesnitsa
@ElKudesnitsa 2 жыл бұрын
Maybe they tried to export it as non-military good. It's 1987, Perestroika at it's peak.
@AClockworkWizard
@AClockworkWizard 2 жыл бұрын
@@gustavgnoettgen The Russians were and remain an empire. If someone didn't speak Russian, they'd be colonized until they did. This is likely for export to English-speaking Soviet-aligned or third world countries.
@haramanggapuja
@haramanggapuja 3 жыл бұрын
Translation not bad. Only leave out articles and use many big words like Stalin era speech. You learn this way to talk, you avoid Organs come house middle of night take you away. But yeah, it does sound pretty, well, lame. It took me a decade to figure out how to talk like that. Now, not only do I look like Trotsky, I sound like him too. Crush all Trotskyist numbers! Use Iron Felix! All peoples now stakhanovite!
@miszcz310
@miszcz310 2 жыл бұрын
7:55"why Soviet union would export military equipment to USA" man at that time Soviet union was not even third world. It was like middle ages or lower (standard of living), also this is after meetings of USA president and Soviet union first secretary on how to disassemble Soviet union without war. So basically it is just for any kind of money they could get.
@StephenRansom47
@StephenRansom47 11 ай бұрын
🥹 I love this channel … “Don’t Go Changing…” Billy Joel
1840s calculator! Palmer's Pocket Scale Review / HowTo
9:29
Chris Staecker
Рет қаралды 7 М.
1840s "Universal Calculator" Review / HowTo Lalanne's Abaque
11:33
Chris Staecker
Рет қаралды 9 М.
路飞太过分了,自己游泳。#海贼王#路飞
00:28
路飞与唐舞桐
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН
Каха заблудился в горах
00:57
К-Media
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
A clash of kindness and indifference #shorts
00:17
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 131 МЛН
Equameter Review / HowTo
13:24
Chris Staecker
Рет қаралды 44 М.
Factor Stencils Review / HowTo
9:15
Chris Staecker
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Why I failed to become a mathematician...
1:43
Dr. Amina Aitsi-Selmi
Рет қаралды 36 М.
Professor Eric Laithwaite: Magnetic River 1975
18:39
Imperial College London
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
hatchet planimeter
4:34
david vernon williamson
Рет қаралды 580
K+E Graph Sheets Review / HowTo
14:12
Chris Staecker
Рет қаралды 23 М.
The Midget Calculator Review / HowTo
7:21
Chris Staecker
Рет қаралды 46 М.
Mechanical circuits: electronics without electricity
19:22
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
路飞太过分了,自己游泳。#海贼王#路飞
00:28
路飞与唐舞桐
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН