Watch Part II Here! 👉 kzbin.info/www/bejne/bHfRpGxoo9elj68
@EmileAckbarali3 жыл бұрын
In my Udemy course on Classic OPC, one of the demonstrations involves a client that supports HDA but a server that does not. It is used to advise the viewer to ensure that they check which of the DA, HDA, A&E specs the clients and servers support in order to avoid a "mismatch". Whilst this is a relatively easy thing to check for in Classic OPC, it's not as easy in OPC UA as UA has many more considerations. I really appreciate how you gave a view into the structure of the OPC Foundation. I never knew it was structured like that but it clears up a lot. That being said, I think Classic OPC was an amazing thing in the 90's. It lead to so many benefits. But you are quite correct about the trajectory. Something went a little awry. Thanks once again for this contribution!
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Emile!
@wasashisanbaka1234563 жыл бұрын
FINALLY BACK TO THE WHITEBOARD!!!! Classic Walker content right here!!
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@wasashisanbaka1234563 жыл бұрын
@@4.0Solutions huge fan of everything you all do. Dont mind me, I'm just getting nostalgic.
@prabhu08203 жыл бұрын
One of the best youtube channels/videos I have ever seen on my youtube watching history. Keep up the good work !
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Wow, thanks!
@eyerider3 жыл бұрын
This is pure gold! Can't wait for part 2!
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
It's ready to go!
@kavinyudhitia2 жыл бұрын
This channel is truly great. It is Straightforward to the important part!
@erickcruz41373 жыл бұрын
Great great content, I always learn with your videos, this OPC series is exciting. Greetings from Cuba
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Erick!
@vadimkoller62323 жыл бұрын
Great content guys, I’m really excited about this new OPC series
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoy it!
@philippm84453 жыл бұрын
Love your valuable content 💪🏼👍🏻
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@tommyhuffman7499 Жыл бұрын
This is exactly what I needed. Thank you, good sir!
@4.0Solutions Жыл бұрын
Glad I could help!
@brito809 Жыл бұрын
Very good explanation. Thank you
@4.0Solutions Жыл бұрын
You are welcome!
@endingofworldmovies7982 жыл бұрын
damn, thanks man. i have been working in a Iiot project in my company as a cloud support team and never really understood why they use kepware server and what is the drawback of opc ua and all , this video is such a gem of information's thanks for creating and contributing to this channel love from India.
@4.0Solutions2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment!
@eragonritter64363 жыл бұрын
What about Apache PLC4X in comparision? As the project aims to do exactly that but Opensource? Especially their Mspec format makes these protocols really readible for everyone.
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
We answered this in this live stream! kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y5OtmKeDhZuBb80
@MarcosDemian2 жыл бұрын
I absolutely loved the explanation. Very detailed and with some bits of humor here and there
@4.0Solutions2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you for watching!
@umarmanzoor7240 Жыл бұрын
This video is amazing!
@4.0Solutions Жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! What part did you like best?
@clayman20003 жыл бұрын
Keep up the good work! Really interested in OPC ua protocol and it’s integration into different systems
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing! Wait till you learn about MQTT!
@MartinBoers3 жыл бұрын
That's an interesting looking PLC on the table next to the white board. ;-)
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Wait till you see what’s next 😎
@dwsan1tx3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for a great intro to OPC UA. General discussion on overall architecture helped to grasp concept, general example for applications and compare/contrast to see why there is a discrepancy on its role in IIOT. 👍
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@smukerji70652 жыл бұрын
In the 90's when I was working for the steel industry automation, we had an open and modular communication system known as Oracle Remote Data Transfer to interoperate Simatic PLCs with supervisory control systems. Cant find it any longer.
@SCADASupportPh2 жыл бұрын
Very good historical background guys. More power to you
@4.0Solutions2 жыл бұрын
We appreciate it.
@jeane02533 жыл бұрын
What do you think about MT Connect?
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
It's great!
@jeane02533 жыл бұрын
@@4.0Solutions Thanks for th answer! I am a 3rd year student in EE and I find these very helpful. With regards to MTConnect, I am not sure what role it plays. Is it comparable to what SparkplugB aims to do?
@Brian_Banda.3 жыл бұрын
Well said👌
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Bryn!
@WanBarmawi2 жыл бұрын
11:40 The OPC Foundation definitely needs a UI/UX designer for creating a stunning front-end web design lol.
@promiseenyinnaya634626 күн бұрын
😂
@dysenkennedy3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, good explanation! A bit over edited, less jump cuts would make it easier to watch imo
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! We will take this into account.
@WarwickSpearing Жыл бұрын
Will you cover / add opinion on Umati? Thanks
@BantengEsports3 жыл бұрын
wonderful explanation 👏🏻
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it
@ShannonLooper2 жыл бұрын
OMG Last time I set up a network OPC connection was in the late 90s. I'm trying to set up one where the client box is a new VM and the server only had local connections. I forgot about DCOM. I can't believe there isn't a quick tool by now to configure DCOM. This is nuts.
@4.0Solutions2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Shannon! Totally agree!
@KwizzleHazzizle Жыл бұрын
I did not even know that OPC UA was intended as an IOT protocol by the OPC foundation. I always used it between PLC and SCADA layers.
@4.0Solutions Жыл бұрын
No, but the foundation seems to want you to think that. Or rather that it's good for collecting data for integrated/shared IT-OT information uses.
@DuneKraftwerk3 жыл бұрын
Starts from the real beginning : DDE
@ofc24632 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this amazing video. I am struggling with some fundamental. Is the main idea for OPC-UA is data collection or is also for real time control. e.g. controlling a motor , synchronization between industrial controllers, turning on/off actuators, etc ? I mean is it a replacement to existing protocols as Ethernet/IP, Modbus,etc ?
@adamrohde35132 жыл бұрын
No it isn't for real-time control. Generally OPC goes 'up' from the PLC to an HMI or SCADA system, not 'down' from the PLC to your field devices like sensors and actuators. OPCUA and EtherNET/IP are apples and oranges. ETHERNET/IP and EtherCAT for example are more apples and apples. Modbus...I don't know exactly but I think its like a turkey
@ofc24632 жыл бұрын
@@adamrohde3513 Thank you Adam. Very Helpful.
@michaeldowdell20053 жыл бұрын
Great content. I would really appreciate getting rid of the backgroung music.
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! We will take this into account.
@holdendoit43213 жыл бұрын
Nice
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@shariqkhan77303 жыл бұрын
Hi from ZMS Technology Germany
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Welcome to the Industry 4.0 Community! ♥️
@promiseenyinnaya634626 күн бұрын
Please to be clear, does OPC mean Open Platform Communication or OLE for Process Control. Because these variations slightly confuse me. Another thing i want to say is, the OPC foundation are just making more money from manifacturers and organizations. Before i watched this video, i thought it was an open communication protocol that could allow all industrial devices to communicate with each other. But now i see it's only if you belong that you have the chances (likely, only if your devices use the same part of the standard) of communicating. Crazy how the world works, so crazy
@4.0Solutions16 күн бұрын
OPC in OPC Foundation originally stood for OLE for Process Control. OLE refers to Object Linking and Embedding, a Microsoft technology for inter-process communication. Over time, OPC has evolved beyond its original meaning and now represents a suite of standards for exchange of data in industrial automation and other industries.
@chickenz46043 жыл бұрын
nice
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@sherylmccrary90453 жыл бұрын
So a spec originally intended to improve interoperability now proliferates confusion.
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
🤔
@HalenRodrigues2 жыл бұрын
Does reasons 1 and 2 for OPC-UA not been the future of automation still valid since OPC-UA PA-DIM and OPC-UA FX companion specs release?
@jaythompson51022 жыл бұрын
Walker .. god damn you are a great presenter. I am new to OPC UA, am I wasting my time learning it and should I go learn SQL and MQTT?
@4.0Solutions2 жыл бұрын
Jay -- thank you. I recommend you learn all three. In our mentorship program at iiot.university, we have all of the mentees learn SQL, Python and Ignition MQTT and OPC-UA during step 1. Its hard to get the complete picture of Industrial communications and IT/OT convergence without them all. Blessings to you.
@sperez537 ай бұрын
follow you in several you tube`s,one question:mqtt can be used instead of iec61850 (goose),excuse me ,this is not the way for discuss this topic,thanks in advance
@4.0Solutions7 ай бұрын
Someone just asked that in the discord the other day! Was that you? - Zack
@sperez537 ай бұрын
@@4.0Solutions was me
@ysblt10694 ай бұрын
thanks Hank
@asimabusallam31473 жыл бұрын
hi to all
@4.0Solutions3 жыл бұрын
Welcome!
@jzupancic773 жыл бұрын
I am told OPC-UA and TSN is the future for all deterministic control and will replace all industrial fieldbuses in the future........I will believe it when I see it :)