5:03 No, you actually used "-1 x 49" in both cases, and never used the "-49 x 1" option. Moreover, in the first calculation you assumed a-7 > 7-b , in the second calculation you assumed a-7 < 7-b , and in the third calculation you assumed a-7 > 7-b again; why? And what if (a-7) = -7 and (7-b) = 7 ? You never address that special case, even though it is present among the listed options.
@ChidexOnlineMathClass018 күн бұрын
Because of the factors of - 49
@olagbajuakeju553611 күн бұрын
I enjoy it but it should have a single solution that can satisfy the equation Ie expect you to utilize (a+ b)2 a2 +b2 + 2ab Then bring then square up the original equation on both side and that will lead you to a+ b
@ChidexOnlineMathClass0111 күн бұрын
@@olagbajuakeju5536 Can l see your solution in full ?
@モハメドイブラヒム-k8f10 күн бұрын
the first thing to spawn to my head was to come of an example and the first was 1/14 + 1/14 = 1/7 so one of the solutions is 28. too easy hah😅
@ChidexOnlineMathClass0110 күн бұрын
@@モハメドイブラヒム-k8f Yes exactly
@MrMajeed711 күн бұрын
You mentioned that you have reasons for introducing 49, but you never said why you did that