Introduction to Electrodynamics by David Griffiths, Problem 3.24

  Рет қаралды 3,310

Greg Does Physics

Greg Does Physics

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 4
@nikhilchettri3304
@nikhilchettri3304 6 ай бұрын
Thankyou Greg!
@UnedibleApples
@UnedibleApples 3 жыл бұрын
thanks man u rlly saved my life hope that ferrari is treating you well
@SANGWANSonia
@SANGWANSonia 10 ай бұрын
It's not three point twenty four... it's three point two four
@G7NoVaS
@G7NoVaS 11 ай бұрын
I believe your reasoning for why k must be an integer has a defect. You say Phi(phi+2pi)=Phi(phi). All well and good; Phi is periodic. But When you consider Phi(kphi), kphi as a whole is the argument, and for Phi(kphi) to be periodic, all that is required is Phi(kphi+2pi), not Phi(kphi+2kpi). Of course, Phi(kphi+2kpi)=Phi(kphi) if k is an integer, but k is not REQUIRED to be an integer for Phi(kphi) to be periodic, since again, all that is required is for Phi(kphi+2pi)=Phi(kphi), in which case k can take on any value at all.
Introduction to Electrodynamics by David Griffiths, Problem 3.36
23:59
Greg Does Physics
Рет қаралды 3,9 М.
Introduction to Electrodynamics by David Griffiths, Problems 1.16 and 1.39
35:51
Introduction to Electrodynamics by David Griffiths, Problem 1.62
42:40
Greg Does Physics
Рет қаралды 2,6 М.
David Griffiths Electrodynamics | Problem 3.26 Solution
22:03
Brandon Berisford
Рет қаралды 744
Introduction to Electrodynamics by David Griffiths, Problem 3.10
24:49
Greg Does Physics
Рет қаралды 5 М.
Problem 3.13 | Introduction to Electrodynamics (Griffiths)
13:37
Hayashi Manabu
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Introduction to Electrodynamics by David Griffiths, Problem 2.7
44:52
Greg Does Physics
Рет қаралды 2,2 М.
David Griffiths Electrodynamics | Problem 3.16 Solution
25:32
Brandon Berisford
Рет қаралды 2,3 М.
ChrisMarble Prob 4.22 Revised
38:23
Storr Physics
Рет қаралды 671
Introduction to Electrodynamics by David Griffiths, Problem 2.52, Part A
18:00