this man used to be so creative and imaginative, how he imagined the world to work is so fantagious it's actually amazing and very noble, this man was really heroic in his way of seeing the world, it's pretty awesome how much he nailed by observation.
@academyofideas11 жыл бұрын
It's very possible. There's a lot of debate regarding how influenced these early Ancient Greek thinkers were by the ideas coming from the surrounding cultures. There's a book called The Shape of Ancient Thought by Thomas Mcevilley which argues that they were heavily influenced.
@TheRealValus5 жыл бұрын
Yes. I don't think you touched on it, but the Pyrrhonists, Skeptics, and/or Gymnosophists are a great example. Not just naked teachers, but teachers of the naked truth; most likely, yogis, brought over from India. Their teaching of ataraxia, the state of no-mind, arrived at through transcendence of opposites, is very eastern. And Empedocles' idea of the cycles reminds us of the Vedic (or Pre-Vedic) notions of the yugas.
@Roman.Imperial.Artist29 күн бұрын
@@TheRealValuscyclism of history is not exclusive to Vedics. In fact, most indo-European mythologies centred on this concept. As writing and idea of city was born independently in different regions, these idea easily could be too. Very “Eastern”, India is not even east of Asia
@nonexistence51358 жыл бұрын
The fact that this man, with so little knowledge about the natural world, was able to come to the conclusions that he did further affirms my stance that the way in which our universe functions is intuitive to the rational beings within it.
@k.strive465 жыл бұрын
YES
@TheRealValus5 жыл бұрын
What about the masses, who never arrive at such close approximations? Even a broken clock produces an Empedocles, twice a day.
@user-ec1xi9yt9y5 жыл бұрын
Exactly, intuition is a non linear phenomenon that transcends linearity and reason alone
@christineshotton824 Жыл бұрын
@@TheRealValus I hate to put it this way, because it tends to create an impression I do not intend to convey, but most people are less than human. By this I mean that to be truly human means using the gifts of intelligence, rational thought, and reason. Those who do not do so have voluntarily given up their humanity and operate largely on the level of domesticated animals. Sadly, most people not only do not make use of these gifts, but openly mock those who do.
@wospy1091 Жыл бұрын
Until you get to quantum physics
@장현준장10 жыл бұрын
This is blowing my mind.
@κόσσυφος7 жыл бұрын
Strife > Entropy ?! Eternal Cosmic Cycles > Oscillating Universe Theory ?! Great videos! Thank you.
@austintexas98486 жыл бұрын
strife kamia sxesi me entropy (??????)
@beinghimself4 ай бұрын
Nah strife is just repulsion. The reason why it statistically is the most probable result without variance is entropy, basically a probabilistic model for an infinitely big number of molecules that move randomly, with some properties like their potential of attraction and repulsion. Second law of thermodynamics explains why exactly, rather than gives a theory for how things work, just like ancient philosophers here
@irisbunky6 жыл бұрын
Never knew much about Empedocles. What a brilliant and creative mind he had. Thanks for posting.
@user-ec1xi9yt9y5 жыл бұрын
this man essentially discovered the law of entropy
@yasiralghamdi85394 жыл бұрын
It is like answering a questions by anther question's answer
@farhanrafid85844 жыл бұрын
No, Anaximander did
@beinghimself4 ай бұрын
Definitely did not. He gave a possible model for the universe. Entropy describes exactly why the world moves towards the state for which you need the most information to describe it, thus exactly why the attraction and repulsion happen, rather than actually just saying attraction and repulsion may be a possible start of the universe. At this stage, ancient philosophers could never give a why exactly, but just possible theoretical models
@WildMen44444 жыл бұрын
Hail Empedokles! May we all join you in the divine realm one day!
@illwill24537 жыл бұрын
So funny to think how long ago this was all thought up and yet how similar it is to how modern physics portrays the history and future of the uni/multiverse. The framework of thought is essentially the same, only the math has become much more complex.
@yasiralghamdi85394 жыл бұрын
To make it short the scientist is lagging us back to this myths. Philosophors, scientist and mob read this in the ancient books and connect it with modern knowledge by whatever they have to just
@markdelgado69844 жыл бұрын
Everything is based off ideas of the past. Just shows that there are still many uncovered truths to be found.
@oleghrozman41723 жыл бұрын
Empedocles is one of the most underrated philosophers. Peter Kingsley was right.
@abelaajosephjoseph12 жыл бұрын
A very interesting talk, which I find most fascinating. Well done.
@zunairarehman.49663 жыл бұрын
Sir you are more then superb 🌸
@rockstar1515111 жыл бұрын
Thankyou for these lectures. They are so easy to remember :)
@cailynmerrill52733 жыл бұрын
absolutely unreal how the presocratics discovered things we now know to be true about the world - physics, evolution, etc
@jamesalvarez87333 ай бұрын
Although I cannot find the exact quote and reference, it was said in a review of the Mexican American war of 1846 that it would be portrayed as a Thermopylae, but would go down in history as a “Empedocles or herostratus” known for its crimes and folly’s on the United States part.
@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time9 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video! I like his idea of sphere, out of all the shapes the sphere has the greatest symmetry!
@alessandrapinzano69976 жыл бұрын
actually the idea of the sphere came from Parmenides
@napoleon_bonaparte24627 жыл бұрын
He leaped into Etna to prove that he was a god.
@oleghrozman41723 жыл бұрын
It was a myth made by his enemies. We don't know what was happen in real.
@mrbeety Жыл бұрын
Love the way Empedocles used subjective human language (love and strife) in the lack of any other terms and ended up describing natural laws like magnetic attraction/repulsion and/or gravity and even physical cosmology (Big Crunch similarities). Not to mention that the elemental particles that everything is made out of is the atomic theory in its raw and crude form. It's classical mechanics before Newton.
@SheedaBihacC111 жыл бұрын
he was so new age i love it
@traceurGeorge4 жыл бұрын
Do you list any sources used in this video and others anywhere at all? So I could read from it myself and potentially cite them directly?
@saleemisgod11 жыл бұрын
Creatures are designed ahead of time! I like that phrase a lot.It sums up Creationism elegantly.
@123afish3 жыл бұрын
What is the name of the painting @13:08? With the oxen head?
@christineshotton824 Жыл бұрын
I have always thought that the juxtaposition of the ancient "earth, air, water, and fire" was remarkably similar to the modern "solid, gas, liquid, and plasma". Although I'm not sure if there was an ancient analog to the Bose-Einstein Condensate. 😁
@ir0n25418 жыл бұрын
I thought the 4 stages are constantly occurring, for instance exhaling and inhaling would go through all 4 stages.
@Silvertestrun Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@markosiridzanski21819 жыл бұрын
thats what we call nowadays dark energy and dark matter
@scod97469 жыл бұрын
i think somethings are LOST in translation, regarding his evolution theory. I do not think he meant it to sound as silly as it has been translated... by saying that "heads and limbs roamed the earth, and attached in different ways" he probably meant "features which we think belong to one animal, were found on different animals" instead of the mythical fable interpretation.
@legonuts1005 жыл бұрын
well maybe he had to sound so simplifying, to make it understandable to people back then who were generally not acquainted with philosophy and still relied on tradition to explain the world. Also, he lived only a mere 100 years after the "invention" of philosophy, so he probably did not posses a lot of specific vocabulary to truly express what he meant, and just used the words he knew.
@TheSefrew11 жыл бұрын
Brillant!Thanks!
@Saaraayee Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. ❤
@4c00h Жыл бұрын
4:55 sounds like the story of the big bang and the low amount of entropy in the universe at the time, as the universe expands there is more entropy or more strife
@beinghimself4 ай бұрын
The logic behind entropy is that even molecules moving randomly by their energy will always, for infinitely big numbers, reach a fixed macrostate, for the distribution of possible outcomes has zero variance. That one outcome is the one with which there's the most number of microstates of organising the molecules, so basically needs the most amount of information to describe the state, and the more the molecules spread over more space and make their intrinsic energy result into more kinetic energy, the more you'd need more information to describe the system, that's why it happens like this. Empedocles just says things attract and repulse, and it started from attraction then big repulsion. But entropy describes even the reason for why these forces are the outcome that actualises itself, it's because by means of their properties, they have potential energy that is converted to kinetic energy, which increases the number of information needed to describe the system. Entropy is much more fundamental. Philosophers at this era were just trying to guess "possible theories" of the physics of the world without actually understanding why those theoretical models work that way in the first place. Sort of like saying oh ye things spread and attract but not exactly describing why. But just with that you can guess a possible model where the world is one lump that then spreads, and the harmonised ways of attraction between different molecules, result into our complex world, which is still a great model coming from this era. Wow Empedocles
@Roman.Imperial.Artist29 күн бұрын
@@beinghimselfyou are expecting too much from ancient philosophers. All the things you explained were discovered, because of information that they did not have access to. Yet, Empedocles through rationale and experience was first to describe a system that resembles popular among scientists. How would you explain it with the information he has?
@beinghimself27 күн бұрын
@@Roman.Imperial.Artist it’s just that people saying entropy is weird, like it’s highly specific. I understand people who say they predicted some version of a big bang theory, a universe dispersion, and an evolution theory, amazing. But entropy is like -as i said- more fundamental, very specific, and tackles the why itself (i don’t exactly remember what i said but i’m speaking by memory). But ye i agree with what u said anyways if that’s what u want
@ultrafeel-tv3 жыл бұрын
The philosopher's competition is over: Give Empedocles the 1st prize!
@justtiffanylouis10 жыл бұрын
Please explain and evaluate the views of empedocles?
@EuphoricIntentions6 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@noxusfinest41537 жыл бұрын
Strife, we must secure the existence of our particles.
@edmonix64575 жыл бұрын
I feel like Epedocles had a dodgy dealer lacing his stuff every other week
@neighbor4724 жыл бұрын
I always wondered if there was some influence from hallucinogens on some of the great philosphers of the past. Obviously not all of them but they seem to echo some ideas and discoveries that modern thinkers and scientists have come to (or perhaps the other way around) and credited to psychedelics.
@benquinney27 жыл бұрын
Who's your favorite philosopher?
@emisillasilla19417 жыл бұрын
Who is yours Ben
@alshahriardihan19764 жыл бұрын
John Cena
@jacobh21473 жыл бұрын
Socrates by far, he changed philosophy teaching and metaphysics also he made commoners be able to be philosophers directly impacted the hellenistic ages four schools and taught plato
@debarghapaul866 Жыл бұрын
Did he foreshadow Christianity?
@colonelweird4 жыл бұрын
Hold on here. If Empedocles was really a monist who didn't believe "becoming" was possible, why is his philosophy filled with so much change, so much becoming?
@dodogonzaga2 жыл бұрын
For the concept of the fallen man, does it mean that this idea is not originated from the bible? Or maybe the bible "cited" this idea? For what I realized, Pythagoreans also embraced this idea.
@dicktater21224 жыл бұрын
Where love of the automobile reigns
@dicktater21224 жыл бұрын
Could a small lawsuit alter the course of history
@innosanto Жыл бұрын
Did he really talk about particles of animals? Wow
@TheSteinmetzen8 жыл бұрын
Could Empedocles' "love' mean harmony or unity? It seems that would be a better concept for his positing.
@thijsjong11 жыл бұрын
Is it possible Empedocles was influenced by hinduism. Not saying he could come up with this on his own. Cyclical nature of time.Reincarnation. Iternal struggle. Nirvana. Ideas also absorbed in monotheism. Original sin and the fall and expulsion from paradise. Fascenating man.
@adamlees172010 жыл бұрын
Wow, the start sounded like inflation theory!
@christinarampai24002 жыл бұрын
Empedocles was a contemporary of King David. He must had learned from the Israelite prophet(s)
@gda2957 жыл бұрын
fallen creature view quite similar to Gen 6:1
@geirtwo Жыл бұрын
Empedocles theory of evolution isn't as far from the truth. In the cambrian period there where many odd and ridiculous creatures, but they died out and more sensible creatures replaced them.
@Bella_Amour4 жыл бұрын
All this is exactly the same from Indigenous tribes in West Africa. The Dagara tribe from Burkina Faso is where Empedocles teachings came from. Along with the Dagara tribe. It’s funny to see all the indigenous West African philosophies masked into “Greek philosophies” LOL
@SEmpedocles10 жыл бұрын
Let me explain lol
@HorkPorkler4 жыл бұрын
Prove parmenides wrong....... Still waiting
@jacobh21473 жыл бұрын
Read platos parminedes
@perspective5003 жыл бұрын
Yo WTF, those are hindu ideas. Maybe greeks and Indians were sharing ideas.
@yasiralghamdi85394 жыл бұрын
I like how today scientists are using data to revive myths that was refuted from antiquity. Useing data this way is like quoting Gospel to proof myself as the God. I can see jew's influence and believe in these ancient Greek