Introduction to Philosophy of Science. Lecture 3, part 1

[@Письматёмныхлюдей-в5т]

Thank you Professor for these lectures and for your book about formal logic, now I read.

[@HeavyProfessor]

Crystal clear from my perspective. I seem to be the only scientist I know that actively pursues philosophic questions about the nature of scientific inquiry.

[@JonLG490]

what's your field of study?

[@Trumanian]

start from 2:42

[@matiascollado9926]

I have not yet reached the next videos, and maybe my doubt will be solved there.But when we say that a hypothesis is falsifiable based on our imagination, can we say that it can be the case that the hypothesis is falsifiable and we don't know it due to The limits of our imagination?

[@matiascollado9926]

And one more thing to whoever is going to read me. How can we know that a matter can be solved by science?That question came to my mind when discussing metaphysics and religion. What if there are issues of religion that, regardless of believers, can be resolved by science?

[@fedorshinkarenko6416]

8:45

[@Stalley75]

This is an interesting class. A lot of the things he says are confusing.

[@matiascollado9926]

write them so that the people who pass by here give you a hand.

[@JonLG490]

whales are not fish, my G

[@ahmetcantulu6824]

he just said the same thing, it was thought before as a fish, but not anymore. The concept due to observations may drive us wrong base although it seems they do not

[@matiascollado9926]

Why so much confidence to talk to him?