Inverse Square Law.mp4

[@rosy174]

I just got accepted into a Radiography program! Math is always a challenge so I'm trying to get a head start before August classes begin. Thanks for this great video!!

[@TopicsInRadiography]

rosy174 Congrats! I hope you enjoy it :-)

[@King-tp6ui]

You're a radiographer now?

[@rosy174]

@@King-tp6ui Yes I am 6 years now!!

[@King-tp6ui]

@@rosy174 Good to hear. Congrats Ma'am!

[@TejRecordz]

@@rosy174 update how was the math

[@matthewchristensen4822]

I'm doing my Certified Exposure Device Operator exam in 2 days this helped me alot more than staring at my notebook... thanks a ton

[@valeriacazares4864]

this is an awesome explanation! this is the first video where I actually learned how the formula works, thank you for breaking down the problem the way you did!

[@TopicsInRadiography]

I'm glad it was helpful!

[@MsCovergirl98]

this is the reason i'm going to pass my science test. thank you so much.

[@carole9480]

Thanks for clearing up my confusion over this and look forward to more of your great work.

[@TopicsInRadiography]

ThePlusSideOfThings - thanks... good luck in your studies! Luz Manrique - glad to help!

[@raven7519]

Question about the density maintenance formula. How does one solve for 1 of the SID's when you have both mAs and one SID?

[@TopicsInRadiography]

no problem :-)

[@rogerperez6427]

good stuff jeremy thank you !

[@chrisdeguzman7795]

awesome, simple and concise..

[@abrakadabranails3232]

Yay I get when to use the formula

[@ThePlusSideOfThings]

Haha it felt good to see my first troll too haha. Success lol great vids im currently in radiology school....first year

[@hodaaburgeba9559]

Helpful video, could you please explain to me how you reduced the inches 80 to 10 and 72 to 9.

[@TopicsInRadiography]

That was just reducing fractions to the lowest terms. Each of those numbers (80 and 72) is divisible by 8.

[@hodaaburgeba9559]

Mathematics, many thanks for the video.

[@PackersFan1252]

Thank YOUUU

[@TopicsInRadiography]

Thanks!

[@luzmanrique127]

This HELP soooo much! Thanks :)

[@rigoelliot115]

Thank you for the explanation.

[@TopicsInRadiography]

No problem :-)

[@guyaneselovah95]

Awesome! Thank you for this!

[@ericsteinhauer3991]

So what did the other trolls say? Just so all the newbies don’t get too terrified of what an rad tech does. You’ll never use this inverse square law as a working tech. You won’t even get developer or fixer on your virgin hands.

[@TopicsInRadiography]

I don't even remember... it was 7 years ago and I'm getting older LOL. Tried looking for the comment, but they must have deleted.

[@TopicsInRadiography]

@OrthodoxDarwinist... yay! My first troll. I'm hitting milestones people :-)

[@tumelothobejane4284]

thank you

[@12000timadams]

thanks for this explanation, I'm studying to be a commercial rad'ist, same rules exist.

[@TopicsInRadiography]

nice... how do you like it so far?

[@12000timadams]

Back to school Physics, hmm...I'll get there.

[@TopicsInRadiography]

Good luck!

[@salehinthedark7585]

it helpful thaaaaaaaank you

[@TopicsInRadiography]

no problem

[@ellenchai8914]

in the first example you wrote 70" instead of 72" and that confused me alot

[@TopicsInRadiography]

I'm not sure which example you're speaking about... this video only contains one example where 72" is used.

[@45camcor]

nice vid

[@arlenisperez2534]

why arent we using the mAs

[@TopicsInRadiography]

The question asks for the new "exposure" at the new distance, not "how to maintain exposure" at the new distance.

[@navyforeveryoungjean-phili5940]

It took you way too long to get to the point

[@TopicsInRadiography]

I'm sorry you feel that way. Are you a student of radiography?