As a mathematician, can attest that we generalize everything
@MsSonali19805 жыл бұрын
But you will never find an epsilon < 0 no matter how hard you try to *1/2 it :D
@davidnassau235 жыл бұрын
You’re speaking for all mathematicians? What a generalization
@MsSonali19805 жыл бұрын
@@davidnassau23 That's so trivial :D
@asukalangleysoryu66954 жыл бұрын
@@davidnassau23 THAT'S THE JOKE!
@Oscar16180334 жыл бұрын
We surely do
@doodelay5 жыл бұрын
This video is literally perfect. The perfect animation The perfect presentation The perfect complexity The perfect simplicity The perfect context The perfect humor The perfect generalization, damn... this is masterful teaching
@ShivamSinghChauhan00110 ай бұрын
The perfect comment
@Fleetstreetbestone9 ай бұрын
“”Uhm actually perfection is subjective and I didn’t find this funny….” 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓”🤓
@Fleetstreetbestone9 ай бұрын
This reply is perfect
@frankherbert96065 жыл бұрын
Dude, you are starting to beat out PBS Spacetime for my daily KZbin "science fix". I still love that channel, but your topics are consistently educational. Even if I'm already familiar the subject matter, you have the wonderful habit of striving for the most accurate models, metaphors and analogies while minimizing the use of and/or correcting models that are inaccurate or oversimplify the subject matter. This makes even well known topics seem fresh and exciting! Thank you and please...Keep up the good work!
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Glad you like my work :-)
@evilotis015 жыл бұрын
Man, i swear that every time i watch one of your videos, there's at least one "ohhhhhhhh NOW i get it" moment, even (or especially, actually) if the video is on a topic i've watched plenty of other stuff about. (This time it was the 4π being included in the constant - i'd always wondered why it just disappeared!) There are plenty of other really great science KZbinrs, but you have a real knack for explaining difficult concepts without dumbing them down, and for somehow just making things click. Keep up the good work - you're doing a really wonderful job!
@binayakthakur51225 жыл бұрын
Coulomb to Newton : can i copy your homework Newton: yeah but change it little bit Coulomb: hah *changes m to q and g to k * 😎
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
Ha!
@ahmedyasser31275 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@pranavsutar91164 жыл бұрын
Haha
@SteveRyder143 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@lazaruslong922 жыл бұрын
Atilla the Pun strikes again
@Master_Therion5 жыл бұрын
6:40 In other words; before Einstein, physicists thought they had Unification mostly _squared_ away.
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
Ha!
@MusicalRaichu5 жыл бұрын
What a bunch of squares!
@Soupy_loopy5 жыл бұрын
Stop kidding around; I don't think you understand the gravity of the situation.
@feynstein10045 жыл бұрын
Ahaha glad to see you here, Therion-sama
@thenasadude68785 жыл бұрын
They Parker-squared it
@niji83105 жыл бұрын
What if there is no Theory of Everything because it's okay for the Universe to be a little crazy too?
@lkajsdflkasjdf15975 жыл бұрын
If there isn’t a theory of everything then I cant wait to see the mathematical proof on that. The math to prove a lack of an answer is always more interesting than an answer to something. I cite the roman version of squaring the circle for that one. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle
@viniciusdeloi93864 жыл бұрын
What if there's no such proof? I mean, Gödel's show us that you can't prove everything in math (even if it's a true statement)
@bozo56324 жыл бұрын
That's a theory of everything.
@justasaiyanfromearth52524 жыл бұрын
@@viniciusdeloi9386 Does Gödel's theorem apply here? I thought it only applies to Arithmetic.
@cxiliapersono3 жыл бұрын
@@justasaiyanfromearth5252 Well, it applies to "formal systems", where you assume axioms and go ahead with rules. You could call the Fundamental Laws of Physics "axioms" and then go ahead with "math as usual" (which can be as complex as you like, the likes of Whitehead and Russell's "Principia Mathematica"). Furthermore, Gödel's argument hints a "recursion problem" on the diagonalisation. There may as well be an undemonstrable conjecture upon information itself within our universe, which could forbid us from unifying the very same rules we're trying to tackle (and use as a tool to do so).
@CTCTraining15 жыл бұрын
I have a GUT feeling we will one day have a grand unified theory of everything.
@nanigopalsaha24084 жыл бұрын
Great pun
@desiderata88115 жыл бұрын
Impossible not to love your teaching skills. Thank you!
@old8885 жыл бұрын
You are damm right!
@GabrielTLGTaveira5 жыл бұрын
I'm from Brazil, your work is one of the most sensational things I've seen on KZbin. You might create scientists around the world.
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Let hope we create more scientists :-)
@crouchingtigerhiddenadam13525 жыл бұрын
The most excellent science video I've seen on KZbin. Really love the visualisations.
@wolfboyft2 жыл бұрын
That thing about putting the 4pi in the constant was some great new information, thank you
@powerzx5 жыл бұрын
I had already found it, but the World isn't ready for it.
@therealallanjohnson5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making your videos!! I truly look forward to learning whatever you’re teaching when you release a new video. THANK YOU!!!! 😄
@RO1a3465 жыл бұрын
I can’t describe enough how much I love your videos. Truly one of my favorite creators.
@jenf25805 жыл бұрын
Nick you are my hero of science. Keep making videos. I never found any video of yours boring. I love QUANTUM because it's a little CRAZY!!!
@ailblentyn3 жыл бұрын
Returning to this video this for the tenth time or so. This is such a good channel. I really hope there are big, unifying discoveries in physics that I get to see. But if not, maybe it's enough that I was around when gravitational waves were first detected. That seems like a privilege.
@quahntasy5 жыл бұрын
Another one of fantastic video, loved it. And you are going to 100K fast, fast-fast.
@TheJohnblyth5 жыл бұрын
Nonuple! So good, as usual. I have never encountered a better physics teacher, nor expect to. Despite the crazy. Don’t let it go to your head, but: thanks.
@emmanuelpil5 жыл бұрын
Great! Great! I'll be looking forward anxiously to the next videos!
@dAvrilthebear5 жыл бұрын
Great video, never thought of inverse square laws in this way as a candidate for a unification theory. Plus Gauss is great (I didn't know he generalized it). Thank you very much!
@GianniStella5 жыл бұрын
I got It! I got this one! I understood this video!! Oh gosh it feels so good.. Thanx Nick as always, can't wait for the next one, kisses!
@alimmaqsa5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for uploading. This is my best science channel.
@succsucc15855 жыл бұрын
dont stop making videos , love your enthuisasm, keep it up
@martinh.50685 жыл бұрын
Your videos are excellent. So much information delivered so concisely. You really are an amazing teacher.
@Bassotronics5 жыл бұрын
Another fantastic video! It’s hip to be inverse square. 👍🏻😎👍🏻
@zacbergart68405 жыл бұрын
damn you... now I'm going to have your spin on the lyrics stuck in my head: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gnOYip6jn8afesk
@hartzbaltz5 жыл бұрын
Their early work was a little too gravitational wave for my tastes, but when Sputnik came out in '83, I think they really came into their own model, commercially and artistically. The whole theory has a clear, crisp sound, and a new sheen of consummate professionalism that really gives the ecuations a big boost. He's been compared to Stephen Hawking, but I think Huey has a far more bitter, cynical sense of humor.
@EdgarSoaresPT5 жыл бұрын
Amazing video! Keep up the good work!
@erdmannelchen88295 жыл бұрын
Haha. Nice thank you for showing my comment on your video. Made my day!
@erdmannelchen88295 жыл бұрын
Somewhat like shwarts--shilld He almost got it right in "Why can't you escape a black hole?" he said something like Swars-shield there.
@Mikey-mike4 жыл бұрын
You are by far one of the best physics teachers I know. I like your no nonsense explanations of physics as well as your pedagogic method. Well done. Unified Field can only be a principle which has not been found yet, and when found would be the end of theoretical physics.
@neerkoli5 жыл бұрын
Another amazing video! Getting close to 100K subscribers. Keep up the good work Nick and tell the Nerd clone that, it's okay to be a little crazy.
@grolmidri44755 жыл бұрын
Great video. Thank you. Keep them coming!
@chuckbucketts5 жыл бұрын
I had always thought of vector fields as a property of the object. TIL they are a property of space. Wow! Thanks again for another excellent video and another nicely packaged bundle of clarity!
@zacbergart68405 жыл бұрын
always enjoy your vids... keep it up... please.
@macronencer5 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video. How do you do it? I'm going to keep sharing them. Got to get you to 100k subscribers! You deserve a million.
@kostantinos22975 жыл бұрын
When these videos come out, I'm radiating with excitement in accordance with the inverse square law.
@herbertgrunkin63333 жыл бұрын
Wow I’m watching this for a school project but can’t stop thinking about how good a product this video is for the channel size
@user-mf2sc8xu6v5 жыл бұрын
It's One of the Awesome Video I Ever Watched..... Thankyou Daniel....
@zodiacfml5 жыл бұрын
Nice video, nice animations and good topic. I've come across some videos recently with the theory of gravity through EM theory which I think you're going into. Good point also on inverse sphere area law which is a better way than the pretty vague inverse square
@jaakkopontinen5 жыл бұрын
Thank you, still here (and other places), learning! Thanks for opening up simple things as well, like the definition of a vector.
@Russocass5 жыл бұрын
Love your videos. Thank you for all your nobles efforts to educate people in science.
@paulcervenka2 жыл бұрын
First time on your channel. Absolutely love the content!
@ScienceAsylum2 жыл бұрын
Glad you found it 🤓
@user-nn6sw6ey8j5 жыл бұрын
Liked and shared. Love the way you explain things. As far as a theory for everything, I think the more we learn the more questions we will unturn. We will never be satisfied, and that's a good thing. Once we unify all forces and conquer the singularity, we will have even more questions than before. We will never know everything, but think about it. If we did get to that point, where would we go from there? Humans need mysteries, we thrive on figuring things out. Curiousness and consciousness are the real mysteries...
@Poop_Deck_Pappy5 жыл бұрын
Another fabulous video! Thanks Nick!
@rouxbnr5 жыл бұрын
I love how good your vids are, cant wait till you hit 100000! Can you make a detailed video on time dilation? It would be great!
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
I'm not if you've seen it, but several months ago I made "The Ultimate Guide to Relativity": kzbin.info/www/bejne/fJW6foBslr2jj6c
@LuisAldamiz5 жыл бұрын
Great, I suddenly grasped better than ever before where the concept of "fields" comes from and why it is so central to modern physics. Good job, Gauss! And also why it is so central to unification theories such as QFT. As for your question, I think we'd get to some sort of unification soon-ish, i.e. not too soon because of the excessive weight of QM-based ideology but soon-ish enough because that hegemony of QM, which IMO acts as blinders, is collapsing as we speak. My hunch is that rather than trying to reform GR to the QM mold it is rather the opposite what must be done somehow, and that QFT itself is a step in the right direction, i.e. less "point particles", more wavefunctions in fields, fields that incidentally are not distinct from space-time except in their way of "bending" or "vibrating". In other words the curvature of space-time is the wavefunction of gravity and the "particle's" wavefunctions are the curvature of the other three (or two) forces, just that one is "extense" and the other "intense" but both are "tense", i.e. some sort of "tensions" (describable surely by tensors) in space-time. This regardless of whether space-time itself is quantized (as it seems) or not: the Plank-sized space-time may be the quantum of uncertainty but it's not enough in itself to explain neither gravity nor QM, it's just the quantum of the field(s).
@anguswombat5 жыл бұрын
Great video!! Thank you!
@parthabanerjee12345 жыл бұрын
I love the way you present serious stuff. Keep it up. :-)
@GustavoOliveira-gp6nr5 жыл бұрын
I love these lessons about physichs history, please make more!
@semmering15 жыл бұрын
The absolut best science channel at KZbin.. Simply excellent...
@zuhail3393 жыл бұрын
Love the content 🖤
@Rafaga7775 жыл бұрын
Another great and interesting video. Btw: I hope that you will pass the 100K frontier very soon and from there to boldly go where no one has gone before.
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! We're so close!
@abraarsameer95215 жыл бұрын
Oh my god, I had been thinking where that 4pi came from in Coulomb's constant since my birth. Nobody ever told me the answer, and now I finally have it :D
@rogeronslow14984 жыл бұрын
But why is the permativity of free space 4 pi ×10^-7?
@VedanthB94 жыл бұрын
Roger Onslow Exactly the same reason. Permittivity is also related to spherical symmetry.
@nanigopalsaha24084 жыл бұрын
@@rogeronslow1498 Actually, It comes from the Ampere-Maxwell Equation, where we deal with the curl of a vector field . Since the curl deals with circumferences, for symmetric fields around a closed circular loop, the circumference is 2pi*r, which gives the pi to the constant known as permeability of free space.
@rogeronslow14984 жыл бұрын
@@nanigopalsaha2408 Thank you.
@nanigopalsaha24084 жыл бұрын
@@rogeronslow1498 You're welcome.
@beenodd5 жыл бұрын
You are just amazing . And when i was about 10 years old i thought about photon being spread and at a distance they wont be seen as if there was nothing and in your earlier videos you mentioned something similar and in this video too . And that made me feel sooo good as if i discovered that
@yuda85185 жыл бұрын
Amazing as always 👍👌
@kw65405 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@constpegasus5 жыл бұрын
Beautiful episode sir as always.
@JuergenNoll5 жыл бұрын
Wow, 100K coming up soon! Congratulations!
@kingstewie64364 жыл бұрын
ABSOLUTE EXCELLENT EXPLAINING !!! THANK YOU !!
@gary_dslr26155 жыл бұрын
Theory of everything... Gonna have to be named Lucid's Law.
@shayanmoosavi91395 жыл бұрын
If Stephen hawking was alive he may have done that. But unfortunately he didn't make it. His ALS finally took over :( May he rest in peace.
@alexandertownsend32914 жыл бұрын
Such a law would certainly be eLUCIDating.
@ValentineBondar3 жыл бұрын
Lucifer’s law?
@james64015 жыл бұрын
Excellent video thanks
@cautiousoptimist5 жыл бұрын
GREAT video!
@ThatWarioGiant5 жыл бұрын
great video as always
@nikhilsomvanshi99605 жыл бұрын
Well, to end the debate, The universe is under no obligation to make any sense to us, but we shouldn't stop trying carving sense out of it, since seeking is what we stand for, as a race.
@william410175 жыл бұрын
But we are the universe trying to understand itself/ourselves
@avanishpadmakar58975 жыл бұрын
@@william41017 no offence but that seems partially arrogant.
@william410175 жыл бұрын
@@avanishpadmakar5897 I'd like to see your argument. Personally I don't think Carl Sagan us arrogant, actually I think that's one of the things we can conclude from astrophysics
@avanishpadmakar58975 жыл бұрын
@@william41017 don't you think we are the universe is a bit far fetched?I am not against research .I don't think we need a reason to work about such an awesome universe.
@imaginaryuniverse6325 жыл бұрын
Everything is connected. The Universe is a single thing made of a great many single things, of which we are an inseparable part. That's my perspective anyway.
@Neo-po2xw5 жыл бұрын
Wow this videos was very easy to understand. Yo thanks for the great content.
@mitsoos15 жыл бұрын
Nice videos crazy!! We need one on Larmor and cyclotron frequencies, i.e. what really happens with electrons (and their magnetic moment) inside magnetic fields!!!
@yakovkosharovsky84875 жыл бұрын
ouch.. now i really hope the next videos are coming soon! Thank you for another great video
@rtt19615 жыл бұрын
Excellent video.
@adamroach45385 жыл бұрын
Almost 100k subscribers! I can't believe you don't have more subscribers.
@jenf25805 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for your videos. Please do make a video on "String Theory".
@ruxleec3 жыл бұрын
Superb; as per usual
@jakecarlo99502 жыл бұрын
This is very good. Completely goofy and very good. Thank you Master Splinter.
@tasosjw5 жыл бұрын
Very informative video. Thank you!
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
You're welcome :-)
@karnjyoti15525 жыл бұрын
I knew there was a connection between gravitational law and coulomb's law. And now i really knew that my thinking was correct. Thanks nick for such great info. And oh, i know we'll find an explanation for everything around us, but i know it gonna take time but i have faith. And don't worry, if you all can't, i am on the line to figure out things!!!
@saswatsarangi66695 жыл бұрын
This is definitely a very good video. I like this kind of history as well
@Skraboing6495 жыл бұрын
Great video as ever. By the way, Nerd clone should have his own show! 😀
@zachhayes3 жыл бұрын
I used the Inverse Square Law when lighting shots a a cameraman for the news. Say the news anchor wants to do a slow walk towards the camera, but because they're also walking towards the light they will get brighter too. I use the principle of the Inverse Square Law (I don't do the math) to light them evenly as they move along the Z axis of the camera view. Moving the light backwards reduces the rate of the light drop-off, very useful
@regisk5 жыл бұрын
Damn, I love your channel so much!
@-isotope_k3 жыл бұрын
Thanks man ♥️ ,I was wondering about this law since 11th grade !
@joyjoseph7672 Жыл бұрын
Wow...what a great explanation!
@ScienceAsylum Жыл бұрын
Thanks! I try.
@lennonwhitehead13523 жыл бұрын
I thought you made it up till I googled it. Lol. Nonuple is my new favourite word.
@noelomaolchraoibhe39112 ай бұрын
I just came back to this masterpiece having realized that electric potential does NOT follow the inverse square law! "It comes down to power and energy. Power is ultimately the thing that counts and as power spreads across a sphere of increasing size, geometry shows us that the power density goes down by 1/r2. Following through with this, we see that the amplitude of the electric field decays with 1/r2. Electric potential is calculated by integrating the electric field and the integration of 1/r2 leads to a 1/r relationship."
@ScienceAsylum2 ай бұрын
Correct. Not everything is an inverse square.
@evilkidm93b5 жыл бұрын
I am really happy you made a video about this! Especially since you gave examples where the power laws no longer hold. I find the introduction of 4pi into the equations quite arbitrary, aren't we just putting it there to make it look more like it has to do with the sphere picture? We could just redefine all units to make pi vanish (less constants).
@PeterMorganQF5 жыл бұрын
Great video as always. May I humbly suggest you introduce the crazies to the Poisson bracket and how it generates an algebra of transformations, and how classical physics is as "weird" as quantum physics when you do? The weirdness somewhat fades after a while, making the gap between QM/QFT and GR slightly smaller, which makes GUT ever so sliiiiiightly more likely.
@jenf25805 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on your 100K subscribers!!! We will be seeing you soon with a silver play button.
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I still can't believe this many people are into my work.
@clockwork_mind5 жыл бұрын
I love these videos! So excited for the Electric ones, since we're covering that in class now. Are you going to explain in theme future why magnetism obeys inverse cube? And why/how it is unified with electricity?
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
I'm going to explain how the electromagnetic field is linked to what charge actually is and how it moves around (like in circuits). Where the series goes after that, I haven't decided yet.
@likaspokas54815 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU! I haven't read about gauss law because i thought it's hard to understand. After this video i can continue reading more about the law. Good luck with the next video. May i request a video about charge in quantum mechanics, why charge needs both real and complex wavefunctions, Noether theorm and conserved charge ? You are the best!
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
I'm taking a break from quantum mechanics for a bit, but I'll get back to it :-)
@GWAIHIRKV5 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. Thanks...
@cesarverazzu24855 жыл бұрын
I love your videos. I'm learning physic while I practice my English. I heard that the quantum theory could explain relativity without the geometrics fundaments that Einstein's used.
@chestersnap5 жыл бұрын
I have never heard the word "nonupled" before, but I will definitely be using it from now on.
@ScienceAsylum5 жыл бұрын
It's such a good word!
@spark_coder3 жыл бұрын
I love your videos... Could you do a video on ElectroGraviMagnetics (EGM)... Please... Thanking you in advance... :)
@mukeshchand53015 жыл бұрын
It's really amazing. The Science asylum
@mikey20is5 жыл бұрын
Terrific !
@minkis425 жыл бұрын
Will we find a theory of everything? No, because all the Albert Einsteins of our day are addicted to youtube.
@macbuff815 жыл бұрын
another great presentation! Greetings from Germany
@felixfelix3421 Жыл бұрын
I want to comment this incase others with ADHD come across this and need it. I have been trying to fit my learning style which is a star into a key shaped hole which is the generic method taught to you in public school. I have been bouncing around youtube video to youtube video at 2x speed while opening new tabs and searching up specific concepts on physics forums when needed, I have been having an incredibly difficult time with Physics this semester because I simply could not find myself interested in the concepts due to the way the content was presented. Find your method of learning!
@scientificmusician34474 жыл бұрын
Good explanation
@kgangadhar53895 жыл бұрын
Eagerly waiting for the gravity-electricity analogy :)
@moohsinatabassum59153 жыл бұрын
I'm from Bangladesh..And i love the way you teach..you are really great..may God bless you ❤
@tristanband40032 жыл бұрын
I'm kind of in the whole "there probably isn't a unified theory of everything, but we learn more about the universe in that futile quest to find one"
@DavidMendoza-pd3pr4 жыл бұрын
Wow so these are the formulas that Accelarator uses in his head in order to use his "Vector Control" powers. I have a deeper appreciation for the writing and complexity that goes in to making that series.