IOWA vs YAMATO BATTLESHIP - INTENSE NAVAL COMBAT

Yamato vs Iowa - you've requested this one a long time and today's the day to show off that epic, cinematic naval duel between those two ships. It must be pointed out, this game isn't best simulating that kind of naval action but despite that, we're having fun. This is the ultimate fight, to find out, which one is better?
That said if you enjoy then don't forget to leave a LIKE! This is Men of War Assault Squad 2
► MoW AS2 Playlist: • Men of War Assault Squ...
►Follow WarfareGaming: / rakcroybros
►Mods used: RobZ Realism mod, Download Now! steamcommunity....
►Donate to WarfareGaming:
www.paypal.com...

[@warfare11gaming]

If you Enjoyed this, please leave a LIKE 👍and make sure to SUBSCRIBE now👇 ► kzbin.info More EPIC cinematic World War 2 videos 👇 ► kzbin.info/www/bejne/epmVp2SYmKl4lc0

[@JawnDeere]

Ok

[@Moomy_PC]

what game is??

[@TheEventHorizon909]

Basically what Japan actually wanted with their flagships final battle instead of the US spamming planes.

[@d.olivergutierrez8690]

Japan: build the yamato, the world's largest class of battleships for a decisive jutland-style battle. also japan: bases its entire successful initial campaign on aircraft carriers...

[@man7912]

And yet, Yamato would only be effective in perfect weather and at close ranges

[@metaknight115]

@@man7912 Actually, she would be effective at long ranges. She did fire on of the longest recorded hits ever fired, when she hit the US escort carrier White Plains from 20 miles, the preceded to heavily damage the destroyer Johnston, and send blow away the escort carrier Gambier Bay to Kingdom Come from similar ranges. Also, the weather wouldn't have to be perfect, just good.

[@PriestessOfSlaanesh]

Yamato would win vs Iowa easily in most conditions. People who claim otherwise are basically the flat-earthers of this topic and dont understand the slightest about naval warfare and numbers. Its actually quite vice versa, its not Yamato... its Iowa that need very specific and perfect conditions to stand a chance.

[@metaknight115]

@@PriestessOfSlaanesh While on paper, they are somewhat even, in real life, the battle would be the equivalent of target practice for Yamato, due to the fact that Iowa’s crew was absolute shit. Like, during shore bombardment on Saipan, she failed to do any real damage, and during target practice on the USS Nevada shortly after WW2 from 13 miles away, with a hit rate of only two percent.

[@ethanng1454]

Just a note, the Yamato fires it’s turret guns very rapidly, as if they were shot a few split seconds after each other, while Iowa fired its guns slowly, as if it was fired seconds apart from each round being fired.

[@Absolut531kmh]

iowa fired salvos, while yamato probably fired single shells. Though this wouldn't happen in real life, as both of them would fire salvos

[@ThatZenoGuy]

All battleships fired their guns about at the same time. However they usually had 'delay circuits' which delayed the middle gun about half a second after the two side guns. This was for accuracy reasons.

[@jackthebagger7589]

@@ThatZenoGuy Retired Navy Gunner here , the three guns in a turret had a .06 second delay between them , otherwise the simultaneous muzzle blasts would affect the trajectory of the shells ..

[@ThatZenoGuy]

@@jackthebagger7589 There you go, basically what I said. Although it differed from nation to nation. Improved accuracy quite a lot too, and yet so simple.

[@Raptoria]

Fun Fact: A single Japanese infantry attack contains more waves than the Pacific ocean. Yeah, think about that.

[@vanguardknight0490]

D-Day: Am I a joke to you?

[@youtubefollower3609]

Japanese Soldier in Tarawa : " I don't even know who you are. "

[@SSA-qb6pb]

Soviet: WHAT DID U JUST??????

[@RenMagnum4057]

Red Army: *EHEM*

[@ipsrayhanal-fatihrobhani4554]

Woooo raptor you watching this ?

[@no_kasa]

I felt bad for the American sailor that was trapped in the engine room. He tried shooting the door, throwing axes, and then he exploded himself by shooting the fire extinguisher, because he thought he could break open the exit.

[@johnpaulabocad6941]

He did break it open but then drowned

[@jamespobog3420]

LOL...I'd like to know how a .45 got into an engine room. There are 4 BTW...

[@k.a7528]

日本海軍でも、艦種を問わず機関室にいた人の多くが艦と共に海に沈みました。

[@TheCourier006]

Yamato: Haha I'm the most powerful battleship! The US Naval Aviators: I'm about to destroy this ship whole career.

[@superclovergamer4683]

@creapsmantic That's quite impressive that yamato is still intact after all these years

[@bkjeong4302]

super pixlemon lord Uh no. The ship is NOT intact, she exploded as she went down which tore her in two.

[@moeh294]

@BadMunkeyM actually its in great condition just ripped apart in two and considering the face that it got hit by 3 or 4 torps.

[@israelvazquezplascencia883]

USS Montana would beat Yamato's ass up with her 4 main cannons if it was built and while Yamato has 3 Main cannons. Let's see that

[@mamankthanos5548]

@@israelvazquezplascencia883 KIROVCLASS 800MAIN CANON + 8000 ROCKET + 8000 TORPEDO + 900 THANOS CREW + 80M anti air gun For Raid Area 51

[@blacktigerace6687]

suggest : 1x Yamato vs 100x ++ Pirate Sail Ship - Black Pearl if can, you can add 1000x black pearl

[@brucejedilee5290]

Very one sided but would be fun

[@ceballos-exe]

Yamato will win but it would be interesting

[@irgiindrastaramadhani1735]

Just shoot then with AA gun and job done

[@syrez156]

AA guns would be enough. Those pirate guns wouldn’t even scratch the armor.

[@rhino1207]

Maybe this condition both side have chance. Yamato but can't use naval guns so They need fight with crew guns.

[@tsuaririndoku]

Afterwards Iowa: Well shit.... Hood: Hello there... did you got sunk by a ship that totally crack your turret mag? Iowa: Yup... Hood: dont worry, you will get used to it.... Bismarck: Yeah Yeah.. she will sunk soon by air craft hunting... Hood: Oh hello, Bismarck..... Bismarck: Hi.... Yamato: Konichiwa... Bismarck: Oh hi! That was fast... Yamato: I got molested.... Iowa: by aircrafts? Yamato: Yup.... Iowa: Well, we all sunk.... Hood: So what are we goin to do now? Iowa: Let’s go to Japan and turned into Girls... Kancolle: Hello and welcome.... Iowa: 4 Ships into girls pls... Bismarck: Wait... where is Hood... Azur Lane: Hello may I help you? Hood: Wait.... is this the right place.... Bismarck? Guys?

[@Mudkun]

DarkWiz888 Is that, “KanColle”?? 😆

[@seer-9126]

@@Mudkun KanColle *2*

[@kyleborboranmain8295]

@@Mudkun omg kancolle was my fav thanks you now because of u I found it

[@foxred1988]

XD

[@Truewordsmyguy]

@@Mudkun j

[@gladdog1046]

The 16" guns on an Iowa class battleship were rated after the war as being equal to or slightly superior to the Yamato's 18" guns, because of longer range and superior accuracy due to better radar controlled range-finding. That said, the close proximity of the ships (toe to toe for battleships) meant that advantage was taken away. At that point its just armor. While Iowa class ships are tough, Yamato had nearly twice the armor, so could hang is a brawl a lot better. I do have to say that a fight like this would have never happened. Both sides would have known the other's position long before the first shot was fired. and if Yamato was that close to a capitol ship, I would bet that a lot of dive bombers would have showed up as well.

[@zenistu5789]

As true as this is the Iowa’s guns (iowa class in general) we’re actually stronger due to higher muzzle velocity which is a factor in long range but this would also mean it would be able to penetrate armor a lot easier and explode inside the ship. Your comment is amazing it’s true but this is my reply

[@jamespobog3420]

@@zenistu5789 Don't forget Fire Control. Iowa could see and target over the horizon as well as maneuver and shoot simultaneously at a speed almost 10 knots higher than Yamato. Japanese did not have the ability to shoot/maneuver. If they were shooting, they had to go dead straight. If maneuvering they could not shoot.

[@curtisstewart9426]

It has been said that the Bismarck with 14 inch guns, had the most accurate guns of all the WW2 battleships. Not the most destructive, but the most accurate. Because, the ship had an advanced gyroscope, that other enemy battleships of larger size did not have at the beginning of the war. American Battleships that were produced earlier before Pearl Harbor had 16 inch guns. The projectiles weighed 2000 pounds, and could shoot a distance of 20 miles. And they could shoot constantly. One blast after another. In the past, I was able to go aboard the USS New Jersey. What a sight to see those two big gun turrets. Located up front. And one in the rear.. 9 big ass guns total.

[@sinisterknight9696]

Lol. You guys are all wrong. Yamato had better range and thicker armor. Iowa’s range fell a couple miles short, but had far superior fire control. Also. The size and shape of the Yamato’s shell made it less likely to penetrate at range if it did hit. Not due to muzzle velocity. Due to shell design.

[@manilajohn0182]

@@zenistu5789 That's not the case. The 16" .50 cal. fired a shell with slightly better penetrative ability outside 20,000 yards, but the 18.1" shell had a much larger bursting charge. The Yamatos carried much more armor than the Iowas and had an immunity zone twice that of the U.S. ship.

[@YourMom-su2eu]

I wonder which ship would actually win in a battle if they meet in real life but that will never happen because Yamato was killed by over 400 American planes if that is not bad matchmaking Idk what is

[@zenistu5789]

Your right but research does point out the Iowa class battleships in east terminology Stormy weather: Iowa wins because of its more equipped radar and longer range. Clear weather: a draw due to Iowa’s speed and maneuverability Iowa’s guns are more powerful because of there muzzle velocity and slightly smaller caliber as it’s not up to size it’s decided by physics so yes a lot of research points out to Iowa but Yamato is a beast of a ship

[@is1mp167]

@@zenistu5789 and iowa’s are most accurate

[@22steve5150]

well if they blunder into each other at super close range like in this video, Yamato will crush any other battleship. The question between Yamato and Iowa was always who would win in the kind of long range gun duel that Iowa was built to fight. In that sort of fight, though both ships could throw their shells well over 40,000 yards (over 23 miles), Iowa's fire control allowed accurate fire at extreme range and Iowa's radar could track Yamato and feed exact positions to it's superb fire control system at ranges where the Yamato would only know where Iowa is if she has a seaplane scout observing and talking on the radio. Basically at very long range Iowa would be expected to land lots of hits for every hit Yamato lands, so the question is does the better fire control win out or does the crazy thick armor win out.

[@TarsonTalon]

Yeah, advances in air power, submarines, and missiles are what made battleships obsolete. There's a reason why you see nations build bigger and bigger aircraft carriers, and better support ships, while battleships have disappeared. However, if railgun technology continues to advance, and anti missile systems get better, perhaps we may see submersible battleships. Rather than launch torpedoes, they simply surface, unleash a hyper-accurate and unstoppable salvo of death, and then dive again.

[@alphabetcommunity793]

@@zenistu5789 plus the penetrating power of the 16in ap round was superior to that of the 18s on the Yamato and musashi.

[@Apex_FFAK]

they did the epic samurai T-Pose at 0:57

[@fajniedobrze923]

XDDDDD

[@Jinnoth]

Yes they did

[@film57r7]

Lol

[@Force05289]

Apex FFAK bruh

[@sawyerislesministryofdefen1845]

Apex FFAK titanic!

[@gelatinoussire7772]

I like how the Japanese sailors were T-posing to assert their dominance.

[@potatoraider7320]

Yamato has a Big T-Pose at the top of its Towerbridge...

[@Ayiooyuh]

its a big t-pose radar

[@rheintochter7367]

Can you add the fucking time when

[@armeniancat234]

Until Lucky E throws some planes at them.

[@jericfamador2830]

Dude its yamato

[@gabrieldu3474]

1:36 AA gunner : T POSE IS U WANT TO LIVE

[@johnnyboi1125]

See it

[@Iamlostofwords]

Kamikaze Pilot: Years of academy, training wasted!

[@Crusaderman231]

@@Iamlostofwords I see it too LOL

[@samdanielvillaester7899]

Pls respect dude

[@こんぶ-h8y]

When shooting the main gun, Japan is not hurray the Emperor, but the main gun elevation angle is good and all questions are fired at once.

[@マヨから]

0:56艦首に菊の御紋が無い There is no chrysanthemum on the bow

[@user-hv4hs5he5m]

それ思った

[@Kontorotsui]

I noticed that too, it's silly.

[@supercorsairjp7200]

仕様でできないのでは？

[@johnsten4100]

Damage report: Iowa: her rear turret exploded causing instant flooding Yamato: foward turret exploded and lost a few aa guns but manage to stay afloat

[@irgiindrastaramadhani1735]

*afloat

[@anzennaufal437]

Well in actual history the ship can keep survive for 9 hours from America bomber planes. That was intense too.

[@Starkillerscat]

The Yamato in this video was unrealisticly slow to fire and inaccurate. It was, in these conditions, just as accurate as Iowa. Also Yamato used way larger guns so yeah, that also counts.

[@piotrwawszczyk622]

@@Starkillerscat yep but count speed + size... Iowa is fast battleship so its faster and smaller making it harder target

[@Starkillerscat]

@@piotrwawszczyk622 not much smaller and 6 knots faster. Also, faster =/= more agile It still had piss rudder like most BBs

[@Spiritt908]

In my opinion, in such large-scale battles it is very interesting to observe the individual participation of some participants, because they can best convey seriousness and fun at the same time.

[@niccoraven4405]

My freind and I recently took a tour on the USS Massachusetts. The level of detail here is astonishing. Right down to the 5 inch guns sounding louder than the 16 inchers from inside the gun turret. Edit: that axe at 3:02 is a US navy secret. How did you get that knowledge?!?

[@tavish4699]

? whats a navy secret ?

[@niccoraven4405]

@@tavish4699 that spinny levitating axe

[@user-do9vx4un1k]

I don't think that's a great US navy secret... maybe it was declassified recently.

[@Jin-di9zv]

I think it's a *joke*

[@yurivillanueva9337]

@@Jin-di9zv yeah

[@nopiez4u876]

Yamato : *explosion* IOWA : ahahahaha boom boom boom..

[@dondomanimation1798]

IOWA : *sinking* I take that back

[@H0LYZ3N]

DUD HOW DID I FIND YOU HERE JOHAN

[@dondomanimation1798]

@@H0LYZ3N who are you!

[@huyphuongvusu2767]

next: Montana vs Yamato pls

[@thanho2282]

Montana cấp X Yamato ngoài đời đáng IX thôi ko như game. Tôi nghĩ Montana vs A-150 sẽ cân sức hơn.

[@thanho2282]

Sovetsky Soyuz vs Yamato hay hơn đấy.

[@PhilMapping_YT]

Yes

[@PhilMapping_YT]

Or do a fight with H41 bs Yamato

[@nguyenucphuc6175]

Ship Yamato dàn súng phụ nhiều + giáp đai dày đứng im bắn nhau giữa trời sáng kiểu này cho dù có là Motana cũng ko ăn thua đâu

[@raymondtargaryenthe1stofhi706]

Bismarck vs North carolina or south dakota class ship

[@Atom-kn3zf]

Dude that North Carolina class and Washington uss class of North Carolina

[@bkjeong4302]

Mismatch, the American ship outguns and outarmours the German ship (though Bismarck could simply decline engagement due to being faster).

[@FRFFW]

Hood

[@Jimmydb]

I have a wargame call Atlantic Fleet and I played with the Bismarck and Scharnhorst vs North Carolina, 1:1 and both german battleships sink the US Battleship

[@potatoraider7320]

South dakota? I think its Icecream Vendor

[@cnlbenmc]

Only reason this happened was the Yamato Somehow snuck in close. Iowa Class was specifically designed for long distance combat, having Super heavy 16inch shells designed to dive at a steep trajectory, Radar assisted gunlaying and unbelievably enough; a ballistic fire control computer (one of the first of its kind) even in the '40s.

[@jaredevans8263]

I think even in close range Iowa could still win. Its superb fire control allows it to track and fire at enemy ships while doing extreme evasive maneuvers to dodge enemy shells

[@iamthehype3684]

Yup if it was long range the Yamamoto wouldn't have even known what hit it.

[@joshuaraewa-ay9684]

Which has the strongest armour and the weakest armor? North Carolina, South Dakota, or Iowa

[@cnlbenmc]

+@@joshuaraewa-ay9684+ Iowa Class had the same belt thickness and coverage % as the South Dakota's but was inclined at 30° to give it sloped armor effect at a distance. Like I said; built for distance fighting, plus had an astonishing flank speed of 34-36 knots in good weather.

[@jaredevans8263]

@@joshuaraewa-ay9684 The weakest would be North Carolina, since its armor was designed to withstand a 14 inch shell. South Dakota and Iowa were both designed to withstand 16 inch shells, but Iowa had a newer and more advanced armor design, plus Iowa had more armor overall due to being a longer ship Iowa>S. Dakota>N. Carolina

[@archerfisher111]

Next round... USS New Jersey & USS Missouri vs. IJN Yamato & IJN Musashi

[@marlouamadeo3357]

Sister Battles

[@potatoraider7320]

They will lose because the Japanese are going to T-pose the shit out of them.

[@lordmegatron2698]

Arnodi Dihendry Missouri is the same as Iowa. Obviously two Yamato’s would win against two Iowa’s

[@chevaneilclarke5089]

And Wisconsin

[@archerfisher111]

@@lordmegatron2698 Not really... It depends on some situations like weather conditions.

[@gamertakdikenal]

Nobody:"ah finally, the greatest battleship vs the greatest hotel" Wait a minute Yamato:"I'M NOT A HOTEEEELLLLL "

[@DooTSweeT]

Well, its a fish hotel now

[@loafbread1920]

@@DooTSweeT lol

[@D.AKULA_TK208]

Yes, a Hotel, a Hotel that have sunked by 10 carriers, 400 aircrafts, and 40 bombs and torpedos. Did u want to see if was reverse? If the BB was the Iowa, there was 10 JAPANESE carriers and 400 aircrafts? I think i knew who could win this battle.

[@rAizen03]

That would not even last an hour japanese pilot's would go kamikaze at the iowa And iowa would become the greatest fish hotel

[@voxpopssoda]

@@rAizen03 my brother in christ one of our destroyers survived 4 direct bomb hits, and 6 kamikaze attacks, if a destroyer could handle that, i believe the Iowa could too.

[@nxc_ninja5490]

Yamato in history:banzai Azur lane in history: *senpai*

[@deltaforce4675]

Can you pls do something with the Bundeswehr?

[@user-qg7qq6nn4i]

こういう動画で大和が勝つのはなんか珍しいから嬉しい。

[@user-ek3mx1ey4e]

透青星 さんそれそれ

[@user-ch9ro5qv6i]

モンタナについては、 アメリカイキリ乙

[@supercorsairjp7200]

@@user-ch9ro5qv6iやめたげてもうアメリカの耐久値はもうゼロよ

[@nauriss34]

Umm..... I with Titanic wasn't in Japan..... I am not bad.... But can someone please tell me what is going on here?

[@user-xm5kd7kd5l]

この距離なら射撃管制とかダメコンの優劣とか関係無しに、打撃力と強靭さでまぁ大和の圧勝ですね。アイオワも良い艦ですけどこういう戦い向けには造られてませんからね。

[@Briggit]

3:04 SHIP SINKING.. CREW GOT BRILLIANT IDEA, THROWS AXE Crew: *THIS IS BULLSHIT*

[@derricklanders1205]

Hey, you never know....

[@11KleinAL]

Well done on the video, but I doubt the IOWA would have fared that poorly against the YAMATO.

[@corieellis6801]

It depends on range really along as yamato is in range for effective combat iowa with its lesser guns and weaker armor would be torn apart though yes not without damaging yamato greatly.

[@_DustDust]

Yea

[@armageddon-tank]

@@corieellis6801 Warning: uss lowa's weakness is AP Shell

[@man7912]

@@corieellis6801 Honestly though, if the Iowa AP shells efficiently, they would likely both sink, or at least cause irreversible damage to Yamato.

[@Valveiscool.]

If there was USS Montana then the Americans should have won

[@yoshi277123]

戦艦アイオワは、排水量が小さすぎて、大和だと対等じゃない。 戦艦長門と戦わせるべきだね

[@abcdefghijklmnopqrstu524]

さだちゃん アイオワは速力重視だったよね確か

[@yukikaze510ify]

対金剛型だもの本来ならモンタナ級戦艦と対決で同等かと。

[@神風さん]

逆に30年前のおんぼろ戦艦に対抗するための戦艦作るってアメリカの国力よ…… 日本戦艦の練度と優秀さはあるのかもしれないけど

[@user-jc3kc8qj3u]

@@yukikaze510ify そのためにわざわざでかい戦艦つくった…つまり…金剛が最強なのでは？

[@kur0yuk1-XIII]

まあ、アイオワと大和だとそうなっちまうよなぁ……（日本人ですがアイオワ級も大好きです←）

[@user-ek3mx1ey4e]

黒雪/Kur0Yuk1 さん同じく自分も日本人ですがアイオワ級は好きです。ちなみにアイオワと戦うけど大和の行動がおかしい。

[@supercorsairjp7200]

アイオワ級戦艦も好きだけど自分的にはモンタナ級戦艦が好き

[@user-mc1mb8ge4x]

大和型にタイマン張れる戦艦なんて存在しないからね。(苦笑)

[@user-ib2yh3ir3q]

相山治祥 精度がゴミだから……

[@user-vu3yp9uo7w]

アイオワ級良いですよね。 個人的にアメリカ海軍戦艦で一番好き。 エースコンバットとかでも敵艦役としてちょいちょい出て来るし。

[@yashsingh3126]

No matter what you do in an all scale combined arms warfare against Yamato , but in a 1 Vs 1 duel , yamato can destroy every rival battleship

[@piotrwawszczyk622]

Even modern submarine with nukes?

[@yashsingh3126]

Piotr Wawszczyk i am talking about the battleships of yamato’s time

[@TomasMartinez-jt7lv]

@@yashsingh3126 the Yamato can destroy every battleship of her time in a 15 km or closer, becouse in ww2 she didn't have radar, making very difficult to hit a projectile, at least, in this range, she can hit. But in 16km or far, wins the Iowa and Bismarck class battleships, becouse of the radars of aiming, that make the USS, and KMS ships hit a lot more of shots

[@loganlilland3249]

If you put the stats, the training, and the crew against each other there is no way the Iowa looses.

[@TomasMartinez-jt7lv]

@@loganlilland3249 of course not, but we don't know about the crew of Yamato in a ship vs ship, but the adventage of the Iowa is the tecnology that she had. If Yamato would have a radar, we don't know the end of that battle. But if we talk about the original states that the ships had in WW2, the Iowa would win.

[@mrdriver2988]

The japanese were T posing to assert their dominance as the Yamato has so epic gamer belt armour.

[@Profkol0rado]

Timestamp

[@mrdriver2988]

@@Profkol0rado 1:37 at the AA guns.

[@Profkol0rado]

@@mrdriver2988 thank

[@emersonmacintosh7673]

"C'mon, man! This is some bullshit!"

[@adelinetsang2820]

true!

[@doctorlivesy7593]

The Yamato is the strongest dreadnought and battleship in the world. Why would this and yes it is.

[@joshsugiharto8729]

clear win by Yamato for sure

[@frankmenchaca9993]

As a former BB62 turret chief, I gotta say you need technical advisors in the worst way. Ship and turret interiors were total BS.

[@jamespobog3420]

Yep. No oil well pumps in engine rooms either...

[@coreybecker542]

USN Iowa would never have a chance alone vs. IJN Yamato in a straight up fight. After the Colorado Class Battleships, the US adopted speed and accuracy over power and armor, where the Japanese focused on sheer firepower, making the Yamato and Musashi both the ONLY battleships in naval history to have 18 inch/460mm main battery turrets. In reality, if the Iowa ever came up against the Yamato or Musashi, it's best chance at survival would be to turn and run.

[@ovilexx7744]

True, their capability is on accuracy, speed, and fire control. But Yamato is having thicker armour , and greater guns. Just like a MMA fighter against a sumo wrestler on A fight match.

[@frogshapedplane]

If the Iowa knew where Yamato was (ex: yamato doesn't sneak up on it) then sinking the Yamato would be a cake walk for an Iowa. They can shoot exceptionally far with exceptional accuracy and are much faster. All the Iowa has to do is keep its distance and run circles around the Yamato and use its radar.

[@ovilexx7744]

@@frogshapedplane Yamato is lacking on good crew, once its got a good crew , and better fire control, there Will be two condition. On a sunny day, Iowa Will lose due to Yamato's gun And armour is better, but on rainy , mist or night, Iowa Will win the battle since Iowa's radar is superior, also Iowa still superior in speed too, so she can control the battle speed. Imagine if we can combine both of them, and with Bismarck's reload speed with only 20 secs....

[@dtmwtch]

18 inch with less power than Iowa 16

[@williamschofield2117]

The sister's hip of the Iowa, the Missouri would win against the Yamato, because the Missouri was upgraded by the Americans to fight in the Iraq war

[@IMAN7THRYLOS]

Nice video. Yamato had higher caliber guns and more armour whereas IOWA had more advanced shells, higher speed and better sensors. In your scenario, Yamato ambushes and engages IOWA in close range. Had the two ships engaged in a similar situation, I would also favor the Yamato. Iowa's best chance to win against the Yamato in an 1-1, would be to detect and engage from long range in blue water sea. Using the superior radar, target system and superior speed, she would cause more damage to the Yamato than receive.

[@metaknight115]

They were in close range though, according to professionals, the victory would depend completely on the battle circumstances

[@metaknight115]

Assuming you are not a professional , of course

[@markhoffman9655]

Yamato's main armour was deficient in design - they couldn't make it in one piece and ended up just riveting 2 thinner sheets together. Analysis of the hull wreckage showed the rivets broke under stress during combat. Factor that into your simulation ...

[@rkcoon]

Now, you need to do a four way brawl - Yamato and Bismark VS Iowa and Hood. Two brawlers vs two greyhounds.

[@snakeplissken2018]

Well that would be a 2 on 1 fight If I was Capt of the Iowa in that fight I'd turn my guns on to the Hood and sink it myself because it not going to do me a shit bit of good, It's a cruiser not a battleship it has no armor no protection

[@DooTSweeT]

Snake Plissken *when the matchmaker turns on friendly fire and you have that one useless teammate*

[@D.AKULA_TK208]

@@snakeplissken2018 dude, the Royal Navy was the most powerfull navy at 1941, Hood was the best ship of they, you cant talk that the hood will go sunk because hes a battle cruiser, what happened to he in the denmark strait was luck, because this can happen with ANY ship or tank.

[@D.AKULA_TK208]

@@snakeplissken2018 its logical, the hood will go sink in a battle vs the Yamato and Bismarck, but what have you talked dont make any sense, Hood have a good armor in the sides, but not in the deck, he sunk beacuse thar

[@D.AKULA_TK208]

@@snakeplissken2018 he is classified how a battle cruiser because that, Heavy armor and main guns.

[@dakkahead517]

Lol, the Yamato that had been turned away by a destroyer. Lest we forget the battle off Samar.

[@henzo.78]

They dont have enough resources and ammunition

[@fsby952]

歴史上実現しなかった戦艦同士のガチBATTLEですな

[@klynt2763]

0:35 Moral of the video Never whistle it can bring bad luck

[@MiniforceVoltzillaPrime]

0:38 USS Iowa: What the hell is that. SHIT! Alert alert! There's a Battleship IJN Yamato! (Alert sound)

[@lemonssoul6616]

40cmクラスのアイオワの主砲に間違えても大和の砲塔とその周辺を貫徹する貫通力なんかないと思うんだけど…

[@user-ef4xx4cf5j]

アメリカの戦艦はノースカロライナ以降 巡洋艦はボルチモア以降が砲弾がSHS(スーパーヘービーシェル)になってるから他国に比べて貫通力が高いですよ

[@user-gw6gn9xr2b]

ユンカースju-87ストゥーカG-6ジェリコのラッパ 超重量砲弾って奴かぁ？

[@freddyli5356]

Let's do some math! Men of War Assault Squad 2 + World of Warships = Men of Warships

[@homemadethingies627]

World of men

[@marlouamadeo3357]

@@homemadethingies627 + Anime World of Women

[@user-do9vx4un1k]

Lol

[@youtubefollower3609]

Actually it's the *DEFINITION OF INSANITY* .

[@Mudkun]

Marlou Amadeo Kantai Collection???

[@LevelRevels]

Imagine if there was a naval battle, Involving the following: Bismarck Class (Bismarck, Tirpitz) Yamato Class (Yamato, Musashi) VERSUS Iowa Class (Iowa, Missouri, New Jersey, Wisconsin)

[@youtubermiya199]

大和は２門撃って1門撃つ砲撃方法が主流だったと思います

[@yukikaze510ify]

一斉射撃した時でも若干ズレて打つように設定されてるけども一斉射撃だと大和船体がもたないてかそもそも46センチ砲搭載してる割に船体がコンパクトな大和…

[@troutwarrior6735]

This is exactly how it would have ended. The Iowa class were actually build more as battlecruisers, that is there were to keep up with the carrier fleet and defend it from aircraft and surface targets. The Montana vs Yamato would be interesting.

[@nukettack]

why not use repair kit?

[@hiro-me3lf]

まず副砲の射程内で大和は戦闘しないでしょ

[@nowthisis2stupid]

Neither side would, the 16" guns on the Iowa actually had superior range to that of the 18" guns on the Yamato. They would have taken full advantage of that.

[@ArdanisGeN1e]

Must've been a very lucky hit for Iowa to destroy a main gun turret on Yamato.

[@22steve5150]

A much luckier Yamato for basically stumbling upon an Iowa at ranges that would be considered "close range" for an Atlantic duel 20 years earlier in WW2 when the Iowa's radar would normally see Yamato as far as line of sight to the horizon allows, and it could "blindfire" with incredible accuracy, something that no Axis ship was able to do (that means fire on something it never actually sees with optics). In a long range gun duel, the battle could go either way, in a fight like that one where they are only like 3 to 5 miles from each other, Obviosly all the advantages go to Yamato.

[@metaknight115]

@@22steve5150 Yep, although Yamato did show herself to be capable of fighting from long ranges during the battle of Samar, Iowa would be much better.

[@user-gm9wi8po5b]

1:00 適当な感じで草

[@user-dt3mh3ud3l]

ここで天皇陛下万歳はおかしいw

[@user-zq8bi1xr8y]

ﾃﾝﾉｳﾍｲｶ ﾊﾞﾝｻﾞｧｲ

[@user-ib2yh3ir3q]

英語だからてっきりアイオワ勝つのかと思ってた

[@user-zv4rn3rs9q]

ユウ・カジマ・スカーレット 先後のアイオワの艦内で言うならまだ分からんでもないけどな笑

[@dfmrcv862]

Me before waching the video: “Iowa all the way!!!" Me at 0:56: Aw, no they T-Posed, its all over...

[@bkjeong4302]

Daniel fmatosrivera To be honest, if this battle somehow happened in real life (unlikely as both ships were obsolete upon launch and should never have existed to start with), it would end badly for everyone. Whoever wins is going to be badly damaged and easy prey for the enemy.

[@Starkillerscat]

Victory depended entirely on battle conditions. In clean weather Yamato wouldn't loose to an Iowa.

[@bkjeong4302]

Starkiller's cat In clear conditions radar-guided firing is far less of an advantage, so Iowa would have worse odds, but she’s still faster and still does have good enough firepower to win, albeit taking major damage herself.

[@Starkillerscat]

@@bkjeong4302 not by much, either in firing speed or movement. They are similarly accurate, and Yamato has way larger guns. It's either who shoots first or battle conditions

[@bkjeong4302]

Starkiller's cat I meant the speed of the ship, NOT firing speed. 6 knots (27 knots vs. 33 knots) IS a notable advantage; at the very least it enables the faster ship to run away if the fight isn’t in its favour.

[@zeromaster21_official]

FINALY edit: an japanese T-pose yay.... edit2: this is a story of how T-pose started, *THE END*

[@sawyerislesministryofdefen1845]

Kentkenny why do you mean t pose you said a bad word t pose is a bad word!

[@sawyerislesministryofdefen1845]

I’m reporting

[@zeromaster21_official]

@@sawyerislesministryofdefen1845 what are you even saying..

[@zeromaster21_official]

Lee Somboon t-pose isnt a bad word, what are you talking about?

[@tmp2117]

next time Bismarck VS yomato

[@asdfmupan5132]

yamato

[@user-wm8eu9br9c]

한국인이드앗!

[@bkjeong4302]

That’s a hilarious mismatch...

[@DoctorDeath147]

The Yamato destroyed the Iowa. Bismarck has no chance.

[@JayVanSaxman]

Wouldn't doubt this outcome

[@carterbusby239]

I love it how the Iowa keeps fighting until they completely underwater. Shows that Americans won’t go down without a fight.

[@johncedrickagustin1565]

Bismarck Vs Yamato too Bismarck sinks but still fights

[@gabrieldu3474]

0:29 They are *OIL* in this ship, so they extract it that why this boat is *AMERICAN*

[@WadcaWymiaru]

@MitchellShepard Or maybe cooling water intake?

[@TheAceStrike]

Me: i dont feel welcome on this yamato Yamato crew: 1:37

[@pandelex3606]

T pose

[@Mendiar88]

Fighting a battle one vs one, it was obvious the Yamato would win

[@johnsten4100]

Yamato only lost a few AA guns and her foward gun turret.

[@BLUNTESSTBOOT233]

@@johnsten4100 Iowa lost her rear turret and that caused instant flooding 🤷‍♂️

[@bkjeong4302]

To be honest the outcome of this battle wouldn’t be obvious. Both ships are quite capable of killing the other.

[@ussneworleans7490]

That's one sneaky yammato

[@Ace_Star_543]

Imagine if Iowa and Yamato actually fought in real life

[@Mudkun]

Kantai Collection? 😂😂😂😂

[@Ace_Star_543]

@@Mudkun huh? I don’t understand

[@Mudkun]

@@Ace_Star_543 It's a Japanese video game that is all WW2 ships are turned into human females, like Iowa and Yamato. And you fight the demon ships during missions and events. 😊⚓

[@Mudkun]

@@Ace_Star_543 The gameplay is that yourself as the Admiral of your fleet, do something, upgrade your shipgirls, and complete them to unlock stuffs and aid more characters. ☺

[@thunderbird1921]

That would have been one of the most violent and gruesome battleship clashes of all time. Binkov's Battlegrounds has done a video showing just how evenly matched the vessels were in areas, and their sheer power. The reason he said Iowa had a chance of victory is partially because of its speed advantage over Yamato's heavier and slower hull.

[@DCS_Eternal]

Yamato: hehe *THANKS FOR STANDING STILL* *Tf2 reference*

[@tytoalbasoren9457]

As soon as I saw the Japanese T-posing, I immediately knew the Iowa is gonna get yeeted.

[@bubale926]

where’s the kamikaze attacks

[@marlouamadeo3357]

Lol

[@theirishgamer23ytlol3]

Theres none left

[@jameshanlon5689]

I just love the TARDIS affect in the main turrets of both ships.

[@steamBR1]

japan: ships and kamikazes germany: u boats america: EAT THOSE PLANES DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[@suzuraniii9154]

実際の海戦はこんな上手く戦況はすすまんで。 いくら兵器が強くても動かすのは人間だよね

[@CobaltLancer]

At this point, I’d love to see a Iowa and Missouri vs Yamato or maybe even Iowa and Bismarck vs Yamato 🧐

[@D.AKULA_TK208]

Iowa and Missouri sink, Yamato will go heavy damage, but he was created for this... I can talk this using the history, Bismarck was sinked by more than 40 royal navy ships, (Royal Navy was the most powerfull) BUT, was he tripulation that realy sink he, they had used bombs on the bismarck hull. Same with all the RN main guns shooting at him he dont sunk beacause hes hull was created for that. Bismarck are a Iowa more "light", now, imagine the same thing with the most powerfull battleship vs 2 South Dakotas Upgradeds... What turned the Iowa class famous waa beacuse they was the faster BBs, yes, they have good A.A guns, main guns, etc, but they always will go be a upgrade of the Dakotas.

[@Absolut531kmh]

iowa and missouri basically means 2 iowas, no point ;-;

[@metaknight115]

Or maybe Iowa, New jersey, Missouri, and Wisconsin, Vs Yamato, Musashi, and Shinano

[@Absolut531kmh]

@@metaknight115 shinano is a carrier. Maybe change it to nagato or some other Japanese battleship

[@metaknight115]

@@Absolut531kmh Eh, it’s always good to have a carrier in my opinion.

[@xianderthest8014]

0:56 This slayed me.

[@zhengsng6203]

The turret rooms for both Iowa & Yamato were totally wrong.

[@markhamrick9078]

That was faster than the Bismark sinking the Hood!!!

[@hmshood1757]

Yeah, he sunk me in 5 minutes (with 5th salvo)! 😉 Greetings from the bottom of the Denmark Strait! :D

[@markhamrick9078]

@@hmshood1757 Greetings to the Pride of the British Navy, the Mighty Hood! 🇬🇧 Gone, but not forgotten....

[@leopardmr.3962]

戦艦大和はアイオワ級よりも砲弾の命中精度がありますよ。 ヤマトの砲弾が当たらんとかなんなん？ まああ勝ったからいいけど

[@dorimuku9883]

気まぐれボーイ マロ⦅Nickel-Bear⦆ すごくいいレーダーがあったって主砲の命中率が低かったらダメ だからね。ふるいこめに失礼しました。

[@leopardmr.3962]

@@dorimuku9883 多分ラグだったのかな？

[@user-zc3bc3kv8h]

大和登場の時カッコいい

[@AngelGarcia-ry9pl]

The Yamato is Legendary

[@chunkysquirrel3038]

But lost to some planes

[@joshuaraewa-ay9684]

"The right ship for the wrong war".

[@societywelivein]

Yamato never Sank a large Warship but Bismarck does

[@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt]

@@chunkysquirrel3038 you mean 900 plane with 400 bomber xD

[@chunkysquirrel3038]

@@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt no because I don't care about the history actually

[@CelestialSwann]

I didn't realize the Japanese sailors were T-Posing till i read the comments LMAO

[@loonloon6860]

Rip to the guy who stuck in engine room

[@adambenzara_456]

This video is very accurate and this would be what would happen to the Iowa if Yamato actually met with Iowa I agree with everything that happens in this video

[@user-sk2ge8eu8h]

主砲を水平射撃する、超至近距離での砲撃戦なので、命中率が高く、攻撃優先で回避運動もしてないので、一発の破壊力の大きさが大和型の有利、発射速度の優越に依る手数の多さがアイオワ型の有利の状況。両艦の攻防力から予測される一番確率の高い結果ですね。ただ、ここまで超至近距離での砲撃戦だと、アイオワ型の主砲弾は大和型のバイタルパートを貫徹可能なので、被弾箇所次第では逆の結果になっても不思議ではない。戦艦の砲撃戦は運が勝敗を決める最大の要因ですから。

[@StellarYankee]

This would’ve been the duel of the century

[@brt-jn7kg]

The term bought the farm came directly from world war II.soldiers could sign up for a life insurance policy that would pay $10,000 in the event of their death. During world war II $10,000 was a hell of a lot of money and would have been enough to purchase a decent size farm!

[@jackthebagger7589]

Retired Navy Gunner here , US actually tested with 18"/45 and found that the sixteen was a better choice , the extra turret weight that would have been required was substantial and the 18" had minimal if any edge over the 16" .. Amazing the ballistics data they were able to determine without computers ..

[@oswaldcobblepot502]

Been saying that for years, but some people just don't want to hear it.

[@manilajohn0182]

The U.S. Navy test which you're referring to was between two projected U.S. Navy weapons. The U.S. Navy 16" .50 cal. gun of the Iowas was at the end of the weapon's development life, whereas the Japanese 18.1" .45 cal. gun of the Yamatos was a new gun. A comparison of the two guns actually used makes clear that the 18.1" gun was the superior weapon, with a shell weight advantage of 500 lbs., a bursting charge almost twice as large, a far larger danger space, and a slightly better reload time. On the other hand, weight considerations (as you mentioned) were a consideration for the U.S. Navy since they wished to remain within the treaty limits of the escalator clause- whereas the Japanese began building the Yamatos after Japan withdrew from treaties...

[@max-and1]

Would be interesting bismarck vs hms prince of wales

[@Gerbs1913]

Would be interesting to see the full recreation of historic ships sinking like Yamato and the Bismarck.

[@bigwitt187]

@creapsmantic Thinking of the Tirpitz? Bismarck was sunk at sea.

[@Absolut531kmh]

there's a lot out there

[@carry929]

流石は大和 流石は海軍 日本の勝利である(大本営発表)

[@user-wj1tm2tj1d]

アイオワからしたら大和の主砲弾くらったら危ない

[@しらす-n7n]

あの距離だと大和の対46cm装甲にアイオワの主砲弾当たるだろうしアイオワの紙装甲じゃあ大和の46cm主砲を防げないからそりゃあこうなるわな

[@ヨモギ軍隊長]

大和はやっぱり浮沈だな！(過去形)

[@user-hh2dl9bf9d]

私なりの考えですが🐱この動画のように昼間の戦いなら火力で大和がアイオワを圧倒すると思います🐱しかし夜間の戦いではレーダーが優れるアイオワが有利になると思います🐱しかし大和もアイオワもカッコいいですね😺🎵

[@user-ch9ro5qv6i]

日本の勝利である。(大本営発表)

[@TheLGNDRY-go9hu]

0:47 sir where are your orders? That’s definitely me

[@MRIlls]

It is very unlikely Yamato would have gotten the first hit. Her fire control system was very poor compared to the Iowa"s

[@Kontorotsui]

That on long range shots, 40+ Km distance, this is a scenario where is point blank range. Usually when you're the first to shoot, you win the engagement.

[@field6811]

40cm砲よりも5キロ長い射程、世界最高威力の搭載砲、砲塔や甲板を射ちぬけるのは自艦の46サンチ砲のみ、しかも煙突を傾斜させたおかげでアイオワより短い やはり大和は強かった、、、

[@user-tc2zq9jt9d]

なんか、、、失礼かもしれませんが、大和の装甲は46センチ砲に耐えられるように作ってあります。 至近距離はダメだけど

[@homemadethingies627]

Finally!! 1:27 The gun sound of KV-2 in scope mode in WoT Blitz

[@mgapryt4930]

oh yes I have the kv btw in wotb

[@mgapryt4930]

finally someone noticed

[@second4894]

Iowaが46の直撃喰らって無傷なわけないだろ、、、

[@StackableGoldMC]

When you realize that the ships are close to eachother: Welp, the Yamato has won it already... you've messed up captain, you should have kited away.

[@t26e44]

It’s been stated that the iowa would lose in a direct fight by many experts, but would win in bad weather conditions, a more equal fight in this weather would be against the Montana class

[@t26e44]

@DOUG HEINS and in addition american damage control was generally better than japanese

[@Mudkun]

0:40 Ship!!! ALERT!!! ALERT!!!

[@TheKickassK]

2:40 medal of honor Pacific assault reference?

[@gmenxtube]

1:11 like if you hear scp blast door sound

[@yoshiharusuzuki9600]

I know this whole video is a "what if" kinda thing and it's made for pure entertainment, but there's one thing I'd like to point out. In reality, Yamato's main batteries would never get destroyed from a direct hit of Iowa's 41cm shells because it was made to withstand a direct hit from the shells shot from the same caliber as Yamato, which is 46cm, and the turrets were protected by an insanely thick 650cm armor.

[@kevinmarsh8922]

A fight between the Iowa and Yamato would be at 15 to 20 miles, and Yamato would be at a huge disadvantage in fire control, and radar.

[@metaknight115]

15 miles is the range of the longest ranges naval hit, the fight would start out at 25,000-ish yards, followed by both ships crossing the range for better accuracy.

[@ilmagnifico82]

1:01 The Japanese gun operators should to say "ute" before shot, not "banzai"!

[@ヨモギ軍隊長]

Yep

[@alejo5502]

I understanded basai, it's like, yes

[@user-zv6vi1cr9f]

America is like WE MUST AVENGE THE BISMARCK Japan is like Not really

[@reporthimllc1584]

Fun fact: it's already been proven at that range which looks like less than 10 km's the USS Iowa would of won hands down due to reload capability and agility.

[@ahrontanalas4152]

uh no iowa is too weak against yamato

[@g-manalt2709]

@@ahrontanalas4152 And where is your facts? Unlike you Report Him LLC has provided evidence, so give us something a little better than “uh no” if you want anyone to take you seriously.

[@metaknight115]

I thought they had the same rate of fire, Two shells per minute.

[@metaknight115]

@@g-manalt2709 A: He just said the points without actually proving them with a source, so both provided no evidence. B: His points are not the best as 1) First of all, she had the better guns, as they were 2.1 inches bigger, and they both had a reload time of 30 seconds according to sources like Wikipedia, and 5 great features of the Yamato class. While it could be slower, a difference in reload time of a few seconds is not going to make much of a difference. I've heard people say Iowa's guns are better because of a higher mussel velocity, but that doesn't make sense, as Wikipedia states Yamato's muzzle velocity as 2,600 fts, 100 fts more than Iowa's 2,500 fts muzzle velocity, and the people who support the claim has said it would only work from a range of 30,000 yards or higher, well beyond any reasonable battle range. So, with an equal, if slightly inferior(but only slightly, and not enough to make a difference) rate of fire, and batter guns, Report Him's LLC's first point is disproved. 2) For his second point, well, it does stand. Iowa had a higher speed of 33 knots, compared to Yamato's top speed of 27.4 knots. However, Yamato is still very maneuverable, as she displayed several extremely impressive evasive maneuvers during the opening stages of Operation Ten Go, according to Drachinifel (a very impressive youtuber who I recommend).

[@oofslayer3528]

@@metaknight115 Iowa's guns had better penetration power

[@Briselance]

Hmm... this is greatly understimating the USS Iowa, but it would still have been a probable outcome.

[@michaeldragicevich3440]

Not likely. Iowa was much faster. Would keep the range out wide. At long range the Yamato couldn't hit the side of a barn. Where. As Iowa had far superior long distance accuracy. So much as when they put the ships back into service in the 1980s they didn't change the fire control system. Cause even with computers they couldn't get a better system. Iowa would control the battle start to finish. Knowing where Yamato was before Yamato knew where Iowa was. Winner. Iowa

[@JIOStudio]

What game is this?

[@warfare11gaming]

This was done in Men of War Assault Squad 2