iPF750 vs HP T2300

[@mauricionavarro9495]

Video patrocinado por Canon. Como Usuario y técnico en este equipo, doy fe de que todo está mal intencionado. Para empezar la pantalla táctil es sumamente suave, sensible y no hay que querer hundirla como se ve el video. Luego el tiempo para procesar el archivo nunca pasa de 50 segundos a menos que tengas el agrupamiento instalado se puede tardar a lo sumo 1 minuto en procesar el archivo y el resto lo imprimiría en unos 5 minutos (es uno de los plotter más rápidos de HP). También se puede "atascar" si usas el driver incorrecto (PS3) para imprimir dibujos de lineas, puesto que el Driver PS3 es para otra cosa.Tambien es falso que no tenga "preview" del archivo porque si lo tiene (o posiblemente no sabe usarlo), por otro lado la cola de impresión es manipulable ya sea desde el panel o desde la computadora. Los cartuchos los puede encontrar en tamaños de 69ml (setup) 130ml y 300ml para mayor rendimiento. Los cabezales a diferiencia del Canon, son modulares, se cambia el color que falle solamente cuando sea necesario con un costo de unos $65 cada uno, mientras que el Canon usa un solo cabezal que en caso de fallar un color se debe cambiar COMPLETO y depende del país podría superar los $500! Y no sigo porque se me hace larga la lista. De hecho, es incluso mejor el Epson que el Canon por la dificultad para encontrar repuestos!

[@buttafuqua]

Agreed. The processing thing is complete nonsense too. It would never take that long to process. I've sold probably close to a hundred of the machines, and have run into very few issues. The most valid knock-outs are the having to be able to pull the machine away from the wall to load paper, and the "temperamental" touch screen. I've sold the Canon iPF line, and can say that they are comparable in a lot of ways, but the "frankenstein" combo of a contex scanner with a canon plotter scares me

[@pinshaw]

ink isnt wasted, its used to fill the lines and the HP has longer lines, hence more ink used in that process. The ink carts are the same, even the starter inks are the same. The T2300 MBK can go to 300ml in comparison to Canons 2-130 inks, but that is hardly worth arguing about. Paper loading on the HP is from the front unless youre 5' tall, that part of video is offf key. HP has dual loading which I am surprised at how much customers actually use, either for a different size or different media

[@xolox2k]

And what with prints longer than 3200mm ?

[@stno1976]

Dear Sir/Madam, Kindly assist me with short cut options of how to change canon ipf 760 large format printer's languages from German to English as the settings is currently in german and i do not understand or read it at all. Thank you in advance, Regards, Solomon

[@pinshaw]

You need the PS model to scan to PDF, but I never set them up with postscript drivers. Reg driver has minimal processing. Canon is still faster, but only by 5-6 seconds.Over a set it adds up, but for one dwg, not really an arguing point

[@GrahameMichaelClarke]

Processing time for the HP is a fantasy from Canon... perhaps they don't know how to use HP-GL/2 because it was invented by HP not Canon... Canon only entered the LFP market when they finally realised HP had got it all right and was making money. Guys be honest or don't bother

[@puppetzinc1]

ohhh, look at all the fanboy HP love. The Canons have always been faster. They print better quality too, I cannot believe HP got the cad market after Canon invented this technology. anyway they make a few models and they smash HP straight up. HP have always, and will always be slugs

[@francescocrea525]

*I will really say thanks to the vendor because the printer came on time, I found no scratches or anything visible so far, I am still waiting for a USB cable to install it..•ᴥ•>**share4.photo/Designjet?я** It doesnt' say on the specs that... well that is not a problem as it is stated on the manual. So I wont complain,*

[@Juhimovich]

and price 1 vs 6 :D