iPhone 16 Pro vs Canon R5 II - THIS IS WHY EVERYONE USES THEIR PHONE

[@digitaldevigner4080]

For all the criticism the iPhone gets for depth of field because of the sensor size it does make up for some of that with its really fast aperture. The iPhone is roughly equal to the R5 with 24mm at f5.6 which is still decent depth of field. It’s also kind of my favorite sweet spot for lens quality on fullframe lenses. The main issue with the iPhone is that 24mm is the only decent lens/camera and we are stuck with it. The longer lens has more reach but the sensor is even smaller. Having an iPhone with their full quality sensor at 50mm or even 35mm would be huge. Someday maybe. I’m not a huge fan of 24mm and find it too wide most of the time. It also hurts the depth of field which could actually be somewhat decent if it was 50mm instead. Cropping isn’t an option either because the sensor size is 1/4 the size and even smaller. One of those 3rd party lenses kind of solves it but sticking a lens in front of a lens like that feels hacky to me.

[@JaredHoyman]

The best place to use the 24mm is in doors and that is where the iphone shines. Adapters could help, but again then you are carrying those around too. Might as well bring your camera.

[@onlysublime]

The way I do it is for social media moments or fast moments. I shoot it with my R5ii in raw. I send it to my phone with camera connect with full resolution . I then load photoshop express and hit the magic button. It automatically adjusts the image. I can crop it,scale it whatever. Better quality than any phone. And by the way, iphones never win smartphone picture contests. It's usually pixel or one plus that wins (and sometimes Samsung). Then upload the canon Pic. I take my R5ii everywhere

[@Wärkky90]

”iPhone never win smartphone picture contests”😂 Have you ever filmed on phones?

[@onlysublime]

@Wärkky90 of course. They're convenient.

[@amermeleitor]

That's why small cameras are so important. A Fuji XM5 is tiny, smaller than a iPhone, but with great image quality for photo and video. Or a Sony ZVE10. With an small lens it's a great everyday carry

[@bondgabebond4907]

But, but and but. How do we fight the cellphone. Everywhere I go, nearly everyone has a cellphone IN their hand. They drive with a cellphone in their hand or dash board. They walk across the street looking at their cellphone. They visit beautiful cities while looking at their cellphones. It's as if their world is the cellphone.

[@JaredHoyman]

So true! People are slaves to the phone. You can lead a horse to water but you can’t force them to drink. Make amazing photos on your dedicated camera and make them want to put the cell phone down.

[@carlom.3737]

Just got back into "serious shooting" recently with the R5ii (actually last Black Friday with the R6ii on discount, but traded that in this BF for the R5ii) and have been a long time iPhone user (usually get the best version every 3 years). While I get your point, and I do plenty of pics/videos with my 15 Pro Max because it's with me all the time, let's be honest and admit that the vast majority of iPhone users won't use BlackMagic app, won't shoot video in ProRes or AppleLog, they're going to use the settings out of the box. A more interesting comparison would be the R5ii kit vs. iPhone video set at what most "normal people" will have it at. But like you, I'm very intentional about when I take my R5ii+lenses. And when I don't have it with me, the iPhone always comes out.

[@DonsWoodies]

I have an iPhone 12 pro max and use it all the time for pics and videos. You are right that the pictures are great. I assume the 16 pro is even better. Can't beat it for "the camera that's always with you". But, I also have a Canon R6 mark II and a couple lenses. Although it isn't always with me, I'll never give it up for only an iPhone camera. PIctures from a phone camera will never compete with a true SLR/mirrorless.

[@diggydretv]

I agree. I just got the Sony a6400 and a Sigma 18-50 lens and that blows the quality of my iPhone 15 pro out of the water.

[@Wärkky90]

I hate that phrase 'the best camera is what you're with you' yes, but you can influence what the camera is with you😂

[@captainkanji1]

I'm using an R8 with Zeiss Classic lenses. The process is what I enjoy. The smart phone is an awesome tool for work. I can take a photo inside of a 3" tube.

[@JaredHoyman]

@@captainkanji1 I enjoy the process too. It’s relaxing for me. Phone is great for the need and speed and convenience.

[@GableVision]

The best cam is of course the one you have with you. But THE difference with taking a portrait photo is not (only) the visible quality (on KZbin). It’s hard to formulate but a big lens (85mm f1.2) also creates a context for a careful approach, dedication and as such the interaction with and position and attitude of the one portrayed. While a phone is casual, fast and easy. That for sure will be visible. I don’t like the word ‘pro photography’, but maybe it’s about that. Of course there is a difference in resolution. Resolution of the photo’s from the phone is enough for KZbin and screens, but if you want to crop heavily problems arise. Comparing on KZbin can’t show the whole story, it tells the KZbin story.

[@JaredHoyman]

I agree. No competition when it comes to the images you can achieve with a camera like the r5ii and a fast lens. I may not made it clear in the video but my point was that the best camera is the one that’s on you and to capture memories that you will cherish the iPhone does an excellent job. I don’t use it for pro work but I use it more with family memories than any other camera.

[@drummerg3331]

Great review! I would love to see a comparison in a standard profile, which is what most people use, including myself. Or a comparison in low light. For good lighting the iPhone is great, but for low lighting the full frame camera wins hands down. I shoot my kid’s sports in poorly lit gyms, which is why I always use my r6II.

[@onlysublime]

For video it's not really a contest unless the conditions are muted like in your snowy conditions with lack of color.

[@HolgerBuerger]

But what about audio? Can you easily attach a Microphone on the iPhone 16? I tried external microphones on my iPhone 12 but you need a 3rd Part App (Movie Pro) and it wasn't working that well.

[@dlpasco]

Good points all the way around. The iPhone video's saturation seems really high compared to the R5 II

[@transparent1054]

There is another benefit using a cellphone that really isn't discussed that makes them more attractive to the general audience, "ease of use".

[@JaredHoyman]

Very true! Small learning curve.

[@PWingert1966]

Your video convinces me even more that not upgrading my Canon SL1 was the right decision. I have been sitting on the fence considering upgrading. I looked at the R100 and it doesn't match my SL1, I looked at the R10 and it is still short on some features on my SL1, and I finally looked at the R7 and it is better than my SL1 in terms of headroom and controls and features as well as being mirrorless. But I still can't justify spending nearly 5 times the cost of the iPhone 16 Pro that I have for casual photography and video making. So I am sitting and waiting for a reason to move to the R7 II when it comes out. I am not sure it will be aimed at my demographic. Rumor has it that They are making it more of an entry level Pro camera which means they are raising the price moderately ( Body will be $2,000 instead of sub-1000) and improving the features marginally. Replacing my six lenses with RF equivalent will cost me over $10K. That is a hard no! The only capability I have a real issue with is photographing the moon since I have to drop the aperture al the way down, and set up for a stacked image. It would be nice if I had an astrophotography mode on the phone for occasional use.

[@tristanwarren346]

I did this last week on a job who said they were fine with just iPhone photos. I was surprised how good the iPhone photos compared.

[@renees8262]

There’s iPhone pics I have that at first glance I could swear they’re from my R6MII with my non l lens like my 28 mm. Zooming I can tell but they’re really quite good in good light. Personally the “big camera” is as much about the experience for most things. I’m so much more conscious with my canon and the iPhone is usually afterthought pictures. The canon L like my 50mm just doesn’t even compare even at first glance to the iPhone. It’s just, literally heart stopping. (Not a pro but an avid hobbiest)

[@greenlightstudios3469]

I love this comparison, I had found after watching a few vids with the iPhone 16 Pro that it performs better at 1250 ISO for comparable Dynamic Range to Canon Clog 2, I found that shooting at 100 or 200 ISO on the iPhone had noticeably worse Dynamic Range. I think Final Cut Camera is my favourite Camera app, finally Apple gave us a much more pro Native app to shoot with. Apple log gets 13 stops of useable Dynamic Range at 1250, that's Cinema Cam DR, I just shoot in H.265 for most things, I have tried the Pro Res and there are definite advantages.

[@JaredHoyman]

I’ll have to check out the Final Cut app.

[@raywu6787]

If you have a directivity white balance filter to reset both on-site camera white value to zeo and take the camparison JPQ photos, you would find iPhone have better image quality than those of Canon camera wthout post. It is because that iPhone color system keep strick with image industrial standard without modification. Any way, if there is a color cast, any photo has no image to discuss.

[@Windsurfingaddict]

I have R5 Mk 1 and 15 pro max, For cropping and using zoom lens the canon wipes the floor, Yes I also like my iPhone for super convenience and have captured some very nice photos but iPhone does suffer More noise as you zoom in more given the smaller sensor. The video on the 15 pro max is impressive for its sensor size 🥳

[@AncientGrains63]

I’m an Apple iPhone and iPad guy. But I’m a windows 11 Pro. I’ve just bought a 16 Pro as an upgrade from 8S. Looking fwd to playing around with new phone and video on eos r. I’ll be getting r6 mkiii when it comes out. 😊

[@TheWorldisRaw]

How do you automatically upload from the iPhone to NAS ? I searched your channel, i see one video about NAS - i'm going to watch that.

[@JaredHoyman]

@@TheWorldisRaw download synology photos app onto your synology NAS. Then download the synology photos app on your phone. You link the accounts together. When you take photos on your phone they will automatically upload onto the NAS.

[@markexploringnewstuff]

Jared, nice job as always! Question - can you share any info on the Synology model/setup you have selected. Thank you.

[@JaredHoyman]

Thank you! This is the one I have amzn.to/4f28L6g. I filled only 3bays so far but will need to add some in the future. The nice thing about synology is you can set it up that all drives do not need to be the exact size so as you add or expand hard drive storage you can buy larger capacity drives. I do recommend buying ssd drives for the cache storage option and if you are hard wired in a network buy the 10gbit Ethernet adapter. It’s not that much money to add those. Otherwise I didn’t go fancy with the mechanical drives for the main storage. I do all my editing from files that are stored on the symbology nas and it operates as if it’s directly connected to my Mac instead of a completely different floor where it actually is.

[@lamarrogers8114]

I use a Canon R7, and on vacation, I let my son use my Samsung S24 ultra +. It takes amazing photos! I did not take a telephoto zoom, we were at Rock City. My son used the telephoto lens of the Samsung, and took a picture of a barn in the valley below. It filled the screen! It also takes video in 4k/60, just like my R7.

[@heynow2880]

Apple Log is amazing. It takes the digital look out of the iPhone. Coming from the iPhone 14 Pro it’s night and day. Also the photos look incredible shooting in raw and editing them in Lightroom.

[@HolgerBuerger]

How good is the iPhone 16 when it comes to an external microphone? And regarding storage: I assume you are limited to the internal storage of the iPhone when recording? Or can you add a SIM card to the USB-C cord and record straight to the SIM?

[@JaredHoyman]

You can connect rode wireless pro and DJI via usbc for external audio recording. You can also connect an external ssd drive via usbc-c and record externally.

[@vintageprinciples]

Yeah great point and excellent comparisons. Would be SUPER COOL to see a comparison of kids sports, indoor Christmas photos, indoor events, etc., between a phone and a full frame. So far I find my Iphone 16 is amazing IF is light is good, no one is moving, and if it's fairly close to the subject or a landscape. Using a phone in the pre-mentioned tougher scenarios (which we do a lot of) I find the images almost unusable off the iPhone 16... Otherwise my R6ii with longer zooms and primes save the day and offer images we just couldn't get otherwise. Also, what is the network app you use to back up iPhone files? Thanks!!

[@JaredHoyman]

It’s called “photos” through the synology NAS app. You install the app on the synology and then there is an app for the phone. Every time you take a pic it will sync and upload to your NAS.

[@Dan_Raja]

Good points, but how about when it comes to flash photography?

[@JaredHoyman]

Thanks! Low light and flash a dslr or mirrorless wins.

[@allee2445]

Nice comparison Jared. The iPhone quality is as good as a dedicated camera in many cases although I've been hearing that low-light situation is still a weak point for iPhone (or smartphone in general) due to sensor size. Perhaps this will be overcome as technology advances.

[@JaredHoyman]

Thank you! Tech is advancing quick so we will see what the next few years has in store for us.

[@ScottBasu]

Even at the HD quality of this youtube video, the graded CLog2 video image quality is so much nicer than the iPhone's. The Canon's tracking is also noticeably smoother. If this video were at 4k and up on my big screen, I suspect the difference would be even more stark.

[@KatieF307]

The bottom line with any photo or video is that you are more likely to use the camera that is immediately available to obtain the shot, rather that the one that you have to take out, push buttons, and go through a sequence to take the first image. No mystery to it. I love my Canon R5M2 and R6M2, but when it comes to taking short videos or a quick snapshot, yeah, the iPhone wins. With the new Final Cut camera software, Apple is increasing their capabilities exponentially.

[@JaredHoyman]

I completely agree. Although I’m a Davinci resolve user I own Final Cut Pro. I should probably teach myself that since it’s going mobile too.

[@georget10i]

The convenience of using a smartphone as your camera is incomparable. But a smartphone video falls apart the moment you put it in a challenging condition. - Smartphones cannot create depth, due to the small sensor. - They cannot control their aperture, and hence cannot adhere to the 180 degree rule to produce a smooth, pleasant video. Smartphone video starts to look terrible in bright daylight when they turn up the shutter speed to compensate for the bright sunlight. The natural depth (bokeh) and the video smoothness make all the difference. And even if an individual frame captured on a smartphone may be comparable in quality to a professional mirrorless camera, when you add the two points I mentioned and put it in motion there is a world of difference. The closest I have ever seen a smartphone video look smooth, crispy, and pleasant is on the Nokia 808 PureView. It's shaky because it lacks stabilisation, and is only 1080p, but I don't know what magic they did, the video looks great. Photos look phenomenal.

[@gerhardgroen]

I have both only 15 pro max and R5 M II n, I like the iPhone, especially for HDR in landscapes. The 5X zoom is very good as well. So in a theater I can get very good shots on the iPhone. But ... my R5 with a simple 24-105 mm zoomlens is way better for all difficult settings, lower light etc. In RAW, to get the best in processing. And my r5 M II is way better foor wildlife, as I please to shoot..

[@peak.moments.photography]

I shoot my kid’s sports with my Canon’s (R5 + R5ii) because I am using the 70-200 or 100-500…..because I need the focal length. I will whip out the iPhone14 pro max for a team shot when I need a wider field shot (versus changing lenses). I also used DSLR’s and then my R5 for some early astrophotography, but have since moved to dedicated cooled Astro cameras. When I stop and think how many imaging devices I have, it’s almost madness. (Phones, GoPros, insta360, Astrocams, drones, Canons) Thanks for your videos though, I enjoy them and your dry humor!You remind me of myself. 😂

[@JaredHoyman]

We’re very similar. I’ll bring my 70-200 f4 RF to my kids games and anything wider is my iPhone. The cropping you can do with the R5 II’s 45mp is amazing. How do you like the 100-500 RF? I’ve been on the fence about buying it for a few yrs now.

[@peak.moments.photography]

@@JaredHoyman I have the 15-35 f/2.8 , 28-70 f/2, 24-105 f/4, 70-200 f/2.8, & 100-500. I actually have 2 copies of the 24-105 because I couldn't find any body-only versions of the R5ii at the time of purchase. I need to sell one. 🙂 I purchased the 24-105 shortly before your video on it because I needed a better travel lens. Hauling both the 15-35 and 70-200 on our hiking trips in National Parks was kind of a pain. Anyway, the 100-500 is my go-to for outdoor sport events. For Indoor track & field meets it isn't fast enough. Sometimes even the 70-200 isn't fast enough and I need to have the ISO at 25600. I actually had an EF adapted 150-600 Tamron before the 100-500 and even though I lost 100mm of focal length, the Canon is sharper and I can crop and still have better resolution. It's also a good bit smaller & lighter than the Tamron. The lens I probably use the least is the 28-70, it's a heavy beast but when I do use it for portraits, it feels like a zoomable prime.

[@JaredHoyman]

@ I shot with that 150-600 tamron and that weighs a ton. I have the 14-35 and 15-35 and I only use my 15-35 2.8 on my R7 for video. I’ll be getting the 50mm 1.4 RF this week and maybe next yr I’ll get the 100-500 RF.

[@bradovard8657]

I do love my phone because as you said, you pretty much always have it with you. Looking at my photos of family over the last 20 years, I can see the point at which the phone replaced the point and shoot and yes, 95% or so of the pictures were taken on the phone and they are probably photos I would have missed otherwise. That being said, some of my most treasured photos were taken with aps-c or full frame cameras and are stunning. There are plenty of pictures taken with a phone however that I also treasure. I’m at the point where if possible, I take a small mirrorless with a pancake lens with me to family events and at home leave a 50 1.4 on for times that allow me to grab the camera. For everything else, it’s still the iPhone because I’d rather not miss those special moments that can’t wait. iPhone pictures are a million times better than no picture.

[@JaredHoyman]

@@bradovard8657 agreed!

[@SirTubeALotMore]

How about indoor light, nighttime

[@adude394]

Really cool review, man! Like a lot of my fellow posters, I have an iPhone (11 Pro, because I haven't bothered to update for quite a while), and an R5, R6 Mk II, and my R5 Mk II should be arriving this coming Tuesday. I'm nothing approaching a pro photographer; just an avid hobbyist. I agree 100%, the phone is amazingly convenient. When I go out to shoot, I have to pack up a couple of cameras and lenses, and schlep them around with me. Quite often, I meet people who make one of two comments: Either, "Wow, look at those cameras! Are you a professional photographer?", or "Hey, old man, why are you lugging all of those big gadgets around? There's this amazing new invention called a cell phone. You should get one!" My response to the first comment is usually, "Not at all, I'm just a hobbyist." My response to the second is usually, "I know, but I'm old-school. I prefer looking through a viewfinder than looking at a screen." I guess that is what it really boils down to, personal preference. The big camera bodies (and long lenses like the 200-800) are definitely more of an hassle to carry around than a phone, but that's fine. I like my cameras and lenses, and that's what it boils down to.

[@JaredHoyman]

Thank you! You will love the R5 II. I get the same looks and reactions. You can't win..lol.

[@bondgabebond4907]

If I am in the mood, I take my Sony a6700 to family functions with a nice Sigma 16mm f1.4 lens attached. I also bring my phone. If I feel the party is crap, I use my phone. If I see my grandson doing what grandsons do, I pull out my Sony. That is when I get the really good pictures. Cellphones are really hard to use at those times. For selfies, a quick shot of someone standing in front of a Christmas tree, something for Facebook, I don't waste my time with a camera. I will use my cellphone because I know no one is really going to look at the photos for than a few seconds.

[@mbenkelley1]

Nice video! Looks like the Home Alone house behind you….. LoL

[@JaredHoyman]

Thank you! I call it the Home Alone house all the time.

[@BIGOSXENCODED]

I agree. The canon for specific moments, but for 99% of the time I use the iPhone

[@Windsurfingaddict]

I use both 🥳🥳

[@mbismbismb]

Nope.... i carry my mirrorless everywhere my iphone is a tool for me to upload to instagram hahaha

[@thatgnaralooguy]

With what I use it for, some may use the same arguments to use an action camera instead of my R52. Hardly comparable. Action cameras have trouble coping in anything but clear water and the look is over-contrasted and without depth. No thanks!

[@kennethlui2268]

I said many times, for action, birds and wildlife photos, use DSLR or mirrorless. Smart phone for indoor and low light is not up there with DSLR or mirrorless.

[@spearmenot89]

At 24mm they are comparable, but if you only spend 3-10k more on glass there is no comparison at longer focal lengths. But it seems like apple, canon, or any of these big companies that keep collecting my money may actually win in the argument. lol. But what can I say I cant get enough of the dreamy look of buttery bokeh. So ill keep paying.

[@JaredHoyman]

I was surprised how it looked next to the 24-70 2.8 RF at 24. I agree though….cant compete with l series glass and larger sensors. For convenience I’ll use my iPhone when the time warrants it and for everything else I go aps-c or full frame.

[@spearmenot89]

@ I’ve been playing with the 28-70 F2 and it’s a(n expensive) game changer.

[@JaredHoyman]

@@spearmenot89I’m afraid to try that one out. I’ll probably love it. The 24-7p 2.8 is good and I have a 50 1.4 RF L coming Thursday.

[@mfarjadi5279]

For pro photographers full frame camera is a must other wise they won't be hired 😂😂😂

[@JaredHoyman]

Agree….but for everything else? lol

[@mbismbismb]

@@JaredHoymani dont take 'other else' that looks unprofessional lol

[@bradovard8657]

@mfarjadi5279 Do you get asked what format camera you use often? I would sometimes get calls like that and occasionally even asking me how many megapixels the camera was. Thankfully I don't get that question too much. I use both full frame and APS-C and sometimes the APS-C gives a cleaner result because I can use a much wider aperture and still have everything in focus. The clients who ask that question don't seem to understand that however so I just say I use full frame since I use both formats at the events. I'd rather make the call as far as which format works best for their event based on my experience.

[@amermeleitor]

@@mfarjadi5279 I know pro photographers that make all their work on APSC cameras

[@richardjarodaustin]

A lot less money for the impressive DJI OSMO Pocket 3 and it has a built in gimbal in 4K. As a professional I wouldn't use my iPhone 16 Pro Max for video (although it looks nice in Instagram). Canon R5 Mk2 trounces my iPhone on a large screen or large print for the wall. The post production possibilities are more infinite with Canon's larger image sensor than that presented by AI logarithm on my smartphone.

[@nimbuskhannk627]

Myself, I also don't take my big gigenourmos car whenever I can take my scooter.

[@JaredHoyman]

lol...love the comparison.

[@alphaandomega2709]

So glad i shoot sony small and compact.

[@JaredHoyman]

Yeah, I don't shoot like this normally ;). I'm also minimalist as much as I can.

[@TWDolphinImages]

Viewing this video on a phone you see less of a difference. On a big monitor there is a huge difference. It's amazing what smartphones can do now but they are limited by the tiny sensor and lenses. And I think they have reached the limit. Real cameras are always going to be better for anything moving, low light, etc. I sometimes use an action camera like a Go Pro for the stabilization and small form factor. The iPhone only comes out when I don't have any other cameras with me- better than nothing.

[@jnthnmchlslzr]

I think you’re the better Jarod

[@JaredHoyman]

@@jnthnmchlslzr thank you! Who’s the other Jared?

[@camerasutra247]

You better sell the r5ii. Let me know I can send you some money for it the iPhone is eating it for lunch. Lol

[@JaredHoyman]

lol.

[@mfarjadi5279]

Wow... so true just spent over 6k on Canon gear 😂

[@JaredHoyman]

Yup…we’re in the same boat but you and I would have it no other way, right? They all have their purpose.

[@jennifertouche988]

Let’s compare the zoom on these

[@mrdamiansingh]

The iPhone is good but you are not showing up to a professional shoot with an iPhone but everyday why not the iPhone 16 pro max which I have is so impressive so I totally agree as well

[@StephanBuchin]

So true, sadly ☺

[@mikede2464]

iPhone quality looks much worse than the Canon....I'm surprised; expected it to look more identical. Sharpness takes a considerable hit, as does color saturation and contrast. Only thing iPhone has going for it is weight in my view....

[@JaredHoyman]

The best camera is the one in your hand. For pro shoots and planned shoots then use your pro camera, but for quick shots to capture an unexpected moment then use your phone.

[@bn5fg]

I don't shoot phones so I thought Iphone would simulate bokeh better with lidar and stuff. But in fact Iphone picture looks extremely flat with no depth at all. And that's just against some basic f2.8 zoom. Not to mention the dynamic range and colors, it's not even funny. I'm disappointed with a phone tech. Even 10 years old DSLR will destroy it with a proper glass.

[@JaredHoyman]

There is a cinema mode that simulates bokeh with very shallow depth of field.

[@andersistbesser]

The apple footage really looks bad, most notacible in closeup shot. For normal people the overpriced phone is enough tough

[@WiFuzzy]

Apple has 28% market share. Basically everyhing else is android. So most people by a wide margin reach for their android phone. Most dont fall for the hype and the gimmicks and extra cost. I would always take a camera. Never a smart camera. I don't do a lot of video so that is probably why. Smart cameras have their place. Next to a $4000 camera body is not one of them.

[@JaredHoyman]

Well, in the US where I live Apple is over 55% of the market; so here most of us see the value ;)

[@WiFuzzy]

@@JaredHoyman Sorry, Thne rest of the world does not. And world sales trump US sales. : )

[@p.c.1346]

Why buy a 16 Pro if have 15 Pro???? 🤣

[@JaredHoyman]

My wife had a iPhone mini and wanted a better camera so she got my 15 pro and her trade in made my 16 pro cost a couple hundred. Otherwise I was content and had no reason or want to upgrade.

[@p.c.1346]

@@JaredHoyman i see... i always take my R6MKII with me... but my wife use her 14 Pro

[@JaredHoyman]

@@p.c.1346that’s the way to go. My wife’s mini did not take very good photos so now I can trust her 15 pro and I’ll bring my canon setup.

[@greenlightstudios3469]

The 16 Pro has a few Caveats that make the 15 pro Just as good, the Promise of a Stacked Wide and 0.5 sensor is great for photos, but it doesn't give you better Video. So honestly the 15 pro is just as good, and that new button on the 16 Pro is dumb as balls

[@HugoBarrientoss]

For real estate photo its imposible to use my iPhone, BUT for video i use the iPhone all the time.

[@JaredHoyman]

Do any of your clients say anything when you use the iPhone for video? I'm photo and video with the Canon R5 II for real estate.