Is China STUPID Enough to Start a War With U.S.?

Xi Jinping's China is gearing up for conflict, from banning boy bands to enforcing masculinity training. With tensions rising between China and the US, are we closer to war than we think? ⚔️
Watch to explore the risks of a new global conflict and the parallels with history. Don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more military analysis!
#China #XiJinping #USChinaRelations #Taiwan #Military #Geopolitics #War #IndoPacific #GlobalConflict #WorldWarIII #HistoryRepeats #MilitaryAnalysis #ForeignPolicy #ChinaDream #TaiwanStrait #SouthChinaSea #USMilitary #InternationalRelations #ChinaVsUS
#militarystrategy #militarydevelopments #militaryanalysis
#themilitaryshow
SOURCES: pastebin.com/k...

[@charlesmartin1121]

We buy most of our stuff from the country which identifies itself as our worst enemy. How smart is that?

[@klainleo4438]

It seem like the KZbin channel is entirely dedicated to propagate anti China narrative .exactly what the western media did to Japan in the early eighties anti Japan all over US and western media is exactly what they doing again to China this time ‘ but you guys we not succeed cause the global south is totally on China side this time .

[@classiccuneyt]

We just can’t help ourselves 🙈

[@Mesopotamia-v6d]

it's benefits my friend benefits, look at Ukraine they are buying gas from the enemy that want to invade them.

[@davidm.corbin4643]

That is exactly why we won't go to war, and they won't fight us. Our economies are locked together inseparably

[@seemooreb.9724]

That's the USAs fault by moving manufacturing to china to save $$

[@jonathanchow-zk3jy]

Trust me, china is a lot smarter then whoever made this video

[@rhysezfpv]

Not so smart when the Brits got them addicted to Opium huh ? lol 🤣

[@MarvinChenFantasy]

@@rhysezfpv It seems that China is not the one that has drug problem today.

[@MarvinChenFantasy]

@@rhysezfpv All drugs flow into US today.

[@ASmithee67]

@@rhysezfpv They got the West addicted to Fentanyl.

[@JPdwzrd]

The current china smart?! 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

[@danieljordan9004]

It’s amazing how India is used as an ally of America when talking about a coalition against China, but also as a member of the “Brics” alliance as an ally with China against America. It’s almost like people with their own motives pick and choose whichever one is more helpful to their ulterior motives.

[@someone-ql6pu]

you will notice that ALOT with west support media they stick people as "their allies" while they aren't not only this list against china. you can go to Middle East. they sticked Jordan and KSA as Israel Allie against Iran

[@Sinkity]

To my knowledge BRICS is an economical union it has nothing to do with military power.

[@elikleber9569]

China's Alliance with India is strictly about $ not anything military

[@dcc70]

That's the way India likes it. India plays both sides to its advantage while claiming to be non-aligned.

[@HighGradeTexan]

Alexander the great found out how deviate these hints can be

[@barkmaker]

If dictators were smart, they wouldn't be dictators.

[@someone-ql6pu]

if dictators weren't smart they wouldn't be a dictators

[@BigBoss-ps6vk]

Right, they would disguise themselves as democracy

[@thiagoaufy4443]

You do know being a dictator makes you wealthy and powerful beyond imagination though? Some are smart but greedy and power-hungry.

[@hitthedeck4115]

It's the opposite, you need to be smart to be a dictator. Whether it's a wise choice, is another matter entirely.

[@stillrookie]

that applies to all politicians :)

[@BeansAndBasketball]

*On Chinese youtube* “Is the US STUPID enough to start a war with China?”

[@TXT-im7dn]

@@BeansAndBasketball lol, i would like to see that too

[@ubiytsa3548]

Thats how the paradox works, but rn if USA went to war with china it wouldn't be good, we aren't stable enough for that big of a war

[@user-le9rc9fp3l]

Our command leaders already said we can’t win fighting there

[@ubiytsa3548]

@@user-le9rc9fp3l realistically i really think that Even if we could were looking at a decade long war. China is not far behind the USA at all and is ahead in alot of things

[@stephanledford9792]

@@ubiytsa3548 Neither the US nor China want or can afford a decade long war. My guess is that it would be bloody and short, with high casualties over a short period of time, but ending fairly soon with a face-saving agreement for both sides. If it looks like it will drag out, the US Navy will cut off shipping to or from China, not difficult to do since all shipping must go through narrow access points. Most shippers will want to avoid a war zone. This would probably push the global economy into a severe recession.

[@none941]

Yes, they are! War is often used to deflect from domestic issues of which China has many!

[@Dumbo3.1428]

So does the US

[@seemooreb.9724]

​@@Dumbo3.1428but not as many as china

[@RichardsMiscCorner]

I think you swapped China for the USA there.

[@iggy5347]

China does not fighting war until now but the US keep fighting war

[@RichardsMiscCorner]

@@seemooreb.9724 you sure? seems a good portion want to elect a president that is compromised and actually convicted of fraud, and your government is completely corrupted by big business, special interests, and billionaires.

[@anonymityisalie6716]

The real question : is america stupid enough to provoke them?

[@jessflo7584]

At the current time, USA is not as strong as it used to be. If Kamala gets in, there goes USA.

[@Highspdlowdrag]

😅😅😅 China is just as cowardice as iran.. China is scared af of NATO..

[@SilverBullet22250]

Great question, ask the Taiwan people.

[@anonymityisalie6716]

@@SilverBullet22250 So americans are the saviors than 😂😂 what about Palestinians? Do they deserve protection?

[@jesusoftheapes]

Give me a break .

[@jmj48]

Never trust communists and dictators .

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

They never asked to do that either.😂

[@tsubadaikhan6332]

They're the only people I usually trust.

[@MrDevilgodspeed]

Who should we trust? The West?

[@Nucl3arSky]

​@@tsubadaikhan6332 The sorts of people who have killed tens of millions of people in just the past century? Yeah okay

[@Nucl3arSky]

@@MrDevilgodspeed I don't see why not

[@hyperpedro2868]

I would say Chinese leadership is not as dumb as the Russian one but I might be wrong. What is happening in Ukraine is a good deterent for a war with Taiwan. Taiwan has a logistics problem but an excellent natural protection. And any war would create an inmediate worldwide economic recession.

[@thumper7047]

Not to mention Tiawan isn't without its own military with western tech, not that Communist tech that calls something stealth even though it has the same radar cross section as our non-stealth F-16. They have way too many on their borders that are not happy with China and would take full advantage of China being weakened at all and having to move troops away from protecting their borders (like Russia did), making it easy for other countries to just walk in and start claiming territory.

[@wil-zc2iv]

nope, China is many times dopier; Russia is lousy at war, China is lousy at EVERYTHING and will be even worse on the battlefield

[@Love_N_Let_Live]

Chinese leadership not as dumb as Russian leadership?! The only reason why China appears to be doing better is because they had more people and they allowed their people to actually prosper for a little time. Now, Xi's iron fist is ruining any chance they had at making their country stronger.

[@TheKCaryer]

War in the Pacific would not create a recession, but an out right depression

[@hyperpedro2868]

@@TheKCaryer You are right. Depression is basically a long recession.

[@andrewtara]

Ilike this statement "We will never allow anyone to bully,oppress or subjugate China people" there s no need for it he's doing it him self

[@JohnJaneson]

Lol true

[@Fat12219]

😂

[@nechoji]

The problem is that it is only in your media discourse that Xi Jinping is a dictator and an oppressor. None of you have ever been to China or really listened to what the people there think of their government.

[@franzthegardener6978]

Dont think so. Chinese are very pragmatic people. Look at history... between USA, UK, Russia and China... pick out the country that has never involved itself in any warfare with another nation.... China. They just want to defend their sovereignty.

[@onealien6460]

Taiwan is not china

[@franzthegardener6978]

@@onealien6460 who cares what you or I think. Especially if you or I are not from Taiwan or mainland China.

[@ssskkk8734]

​@@onealien6460yes, taiwan is just province of China.

[@watsonli5137]

@@onealien6460you are not your mother’s son

[@onealien6460]

@@watsonli5137 i am yor father

[@ruZsiaNa-C]

Is china smart enough to not start one??😂

[@CakeInvasion11]

No

[@CeeLyfe]

Yeah that's the real question

[@dcc70]

If China was a rational actor, yes. But the chance that a dictator makes an irrational decision is rather high.

[@StArShIpEnTeRpRiSe]

@@dcc70 Great example is Ukraine. The smart and logical rational decision would be in 2022 to not attack. Yet, they did just that. And it fired back even more than anyone expected.

[@wil-zc2iv]

the smart ones left long ago, the idiots rose into the ranks of the CCP

[@zenon7094]

The regime in Beijing reminds me exactly of my government I experienced behind the Iron Curtain in East Germany...in both cases there is a Politburo and in both cases the rulers are absolutely not interested in the opinions of their people...on the contrary, the 'right' opinion is dictated to you from above. If an opposing opiniln is expressed publicly, it could have very serious consequences for you...here as there, the state is all-powerful, omnipotent and omnipresent. Classmates of mine were imprisoned for expressing a different opinion in public. Snitches reported this to the police and they arrested the person. And the ordinary citizen had no way of counteracting this. It was horrible.

[@HyennaTheOne]

Yeah and now they are so interested right ?

[@infectedrainbow]

How has fascism been working out for the west lately?

[@slevinkelevra5540]

man when David Hasselhoff was on stage throwing his hips at the wall like bam bam bam boom down came the wall that was so epic

[@worldview2888]

** According to your opinion .. it basically means i much rather (and REALLY WISH) to be living in Beijing right now. I can go there, then move to Shenzhen and stay in China. How on earth do you even come up with some BS story to involve the iron curtain in germany? These are 2 very separate issues.

[@zenon7094]

@@worldview2888 No...they are exactly the same...dictatorships are more or less always the same...and China is a dictatorship...built on the terror regime of Mao

[@triper02local79]

Explain about what is the situation about Taiwan and China now: In all historical evidence (except those written by CCP), the CCP has never ruled Taiwan for any day in history, never. About 70 years ago, after the Japanese government returned Taiwan to the Taiwanese government, it has been ruled by Taiwan's own government (ROC). The CCP claims that Taiwan belongs to China because a "former Chinese regime" once owned it a long time ago. (an ancient government about hundreds of years ago). But in fact, if you want to use the strange fallacy of the CCP to explain "who does Taiwan belong to", strictly speaking, Taiwan's relationship with Japan is definitely closer than that of the CCP. Of course, most Taiwanese people like the current government very much and do not consider themselves Japanese or Chinese. Taiwan's latest poll in 2024 shows that 72.1% of people consider themselves Taiwanese, not Chinese, nor CCP people. According to the analysis of most scholars, CCP covets Taiwan just because they want to seize Taiwan's important strategic position and Taiwan's world's number one semiconductor industry to control the world's semiconductors. All these are excuses made up by them. Taiwan is Taiwan and it is an independent country. Most countries do not dare to resist the CCP out of fear. In fact, 95% of countries today treat Taiwan as an independent country. In about 70 years, Taiwan has its own independent constitution, passport, president, military, tax system, education, and diplomatic missions. Such as everything that every independent country should have, and 12 countries have recognized this fact. Although it still needs work, the fact is that it is truly an independent country. In addition, Taiwan is the country with the highest degree of democracy and freedom in Asia. During the election, each people chooses with one vote. The process is extremely transparent. Many new democratic governments will even come to Taiwan to learn this system. China is a dictatorship. They even have an internal network and cannot see the outside world online. In addition, Taiwan's passport is one of the most practical passports in the world, and it has obtained visa-free treatment for 144 countries, while China's passport has only 55. When you travel overseas, at the customs at each country's airport, they will ask Chinese and Taiwanese to go to different channels, and tell you "You are Taiwanese, please go there and queue up (usually a convenient automatic customs clearance system)" ), and the Chinese need to join the long line. If you are a Taiwanese, would you want to be unified by China?

[@Lulu-j1r4o]

Yeah, I definitely want to change my passport that is visa-free for 144 countries to a passport that is visa-free for 55 countries.😂

[@devin2233]

I'm fine with defending Taiwan once they stop branding themselves as the Republic of China and "the legitimate rulers of China", despite not having control of the mainland in almost 80 years. I don't like China's government, they give socialism a bad name, but I CAN understand their perspective. The CCP sees Taiwan as an American vassal state with the purpose of forwarding American imperial and economic interests, which it IS. Personally I support the Taiwanese people having their own state, but I have my doubts that they're the ones actually pulling the strings here.

[@leke-hf2mf]

@@Lulu-j1r4o 香港统一了是中国的，但是香港护照免签171个国家。

[@evgenitantikov5865]

Russians in Ukraine also consider themselves Russians. Should we support their independence?

[@dashukuerle640]

After ww2, Taiwan was released from Japan and returned to China. Btw ROC is Republic of China, not Taiwanese government, it was whole Chinese government at that time. ROC, PRC just the name of governments like France's first republic and second republic.

[@iainballas]

China: "We declare war!" USA: *Looks around at Australia, Philippines, Japan, Korea, India, Mongolian nationalists and the entire Xinjiang province* Also USA: "Jokes on you I'm behind seven proxies."

[@someone-ql6pu]

are those your pokemons? the one you throw to a deadly fight and he just follow for his death

[@seemooreb.9724]

@@iainballas cause you don't have the balls to go head on

[@JeffChua-w7t]

@@someone-ql6pu

[@thumper7047]

@@seemooreb.9724 ??? We don't? When is the last war China fought? Wikipedia says 1949. Yeah, lots of exp. on their side. Why do they speak Chinese instead of Japanese? Could it be because we (with no balls) fought two major powers at the same time on opposite ends of the earth and beat them both? China probably can't beat Tiawan, and they KNOW that which is WHY they haven't attacked them. Japan would love to take part of that land as their own and China knows that too. South Korea would love to end North Korea and the only reason there is a North Korea is because of China, so S. Korea would love to see this happen. Not to mention how embracingly bad they lost little skirmishes with tiny border countries. You keep dreaming. When you wake up, try reading a book and getting a clue. Chinas "Stealth Fighters" have the same radar cross section of our F-16 (Non-stealth). Almost as bad as Russia's so-called "Stealth". They are about as stealthy as a school bus.

[@rohdri]

​@@seemooreb.9724heh... If you say so. As a matter of policy, the US literally couldn't turn down that fight if it started. But they could definitely finish it.

[@tomw.6757]

Nobody goes to war with their banker and nobody goes to war with their best customer.

[@cjwong]

Friendly reminder: Do not touch the USA boats!

[@rafav9040]

Iran remembers

[@rafav9040]

Iran remembers

[@Shenalan888]

Don't even look at it

[@user-uv7uz5bu7c]

Yemeni Houthi militants launch arbitrary attacks

[@memnon6786]

USS Liberty?

[@wannahit9357]

China will never go to war with the US. They know that all of their military equipment is tofu drag construction built and is pure garbage. Their new stealth fighter jet engine is unreliable, they're gas engines grenade, there guns fire unreliably, and their flagship aircraft carrier still doesn't work two years later after it was launched. When China used to build stuff for the West, it was built with quality because it had to be built to western standards. The things China builds for itself with no regulations and standards are pure garbage. China can't build anything of quality for themselves.. And now that the West has completely pulled out of China for manufacturing, China's done. Last year America imported more from Mexico than from China, and the amount of foreign money going into China is as low as it was in the late 80s. The CCP is done!

[@JohnJaneson]

They will do it out of desperation. If their economy keeps faltering and their people demand more free open elections, they will start the invasion out of desperation. It will not be as soon as 2027, but desperation is a strong motivator.

[@FromMoon-b2p]

yes, you are right. I hope more people are as smart as you in west. cannot agree more.

[@MarvinChenFantasy]

Tell that to the US senators, tell them that China is not the biggest threat.

[@oyj-u1m]

@@FromMoon-b2p 我也这么认为，西方有这么多的傻子我很放心

[@leeming2781]

Your idea is right, China can never go to war with the United States, such as the Korean War more than 70 years ago. China's equipment is all shoddy engineering. For example, in the Korean War more than 70 years ago, the United Nations troops were repelled by the Chinese army with shoddy weapons.

[@T10Titan]

Nah with all the things they see happening with russia they will be super hesitant.

[@GuidelinesViolator]

like W Cop saw what happened to "i cant sniff" floydy

[@T10Titan]

@@GuidelinesViolator huh?

[@jankwartel1860]

​​you can almost smell the vodka on his breath huh? He obviously had a few TOO many. 😂

[@UdumbaraMusic]

@@GuidelinesViolator Shouldn't drink on the job, Ivan.

[@GuidelinesViolator]

​@@UdumbaraMusic What ivan lil bro,im from Ukraine,its an insult here

[@LF-du4uc]

Yes. Never underestimate stupid.

[@KamBar2020]

Never Say NEVER 😎 Justin Bieber

[@JohnJaneson]

Right. Just look at zero covid policy and the resulting total departure of FDI until today.

[@user-hj7kd2jo6h]

Trouble is China’s military has very little experience. With my tinfoil hat securely on I’ve thought for years that part of the reason the USA gets involved in so much military activity worldwide is to gain experience and see what works and what doesn’t. China doesn’t do this, so may be over-inflating their military’s capabilities. As for Taiwan, China’s main interest is Taiwan’s world’s number one semiconductor industry. Perhaps if Taiwan made it clear that an invasion would lead to the destruction of the entire semiconductor industry in Taiwan China may be less interested in invading. Boots on the ground are important in any conflict and right now China doesn’t have the capability to successfully put boots on the ground on Taiwan’s beaches. Also, a lot of China’s equipment are copies or upgrades of Russian kit that’s shown to be crap!

[@mendronesg]

"the US gets involved in so many military activity". No, the US STARTS many military conflicts worldwide. If not itself, through its allies.

[@oozy1333]

If Taiwan said that or decided to sell the company to a different country that would basically be inviting China to invade them almost immediately

[@WilliamSanderson-zh9dq]

I think they can put boots on the ground in Taiwan. They can do this with requisitioning roll-on roll-off ferries to supplement the navy. What I doubt is their logistic coordination. I also doubt their ability to fight off carrier aircraft, and I doubt their ability to even see enemy submarines as the West can’t even see each other’s submarines during exercises until the subs start to shoot. The CCP has a large class of 50+ corvettes (Type 056) which are essentially specialized submarine chasers, and I think they are completely useless.

[@KamBar2020]

Slava 🇹🇼 Heroyam TAIWANese 🦾

[@bingliu-china]

你能说出这种话说明你还是不了解中国，台积电在中国眼里没那么重要。就算美国把台积电搬空了，中国该攻击台湾的那一天还是会攻击。中国要的是这块土地，至于土地上的人跟物，都不重要。

[@martinfitzsimons5884]

First step before declaring war is always banning boy bands 😂😂

[@meetjeric]

they probably banning vtubers too

[@annan7728]

@@martinfitzsimons5884 The proxies come out first, like Ukraine. They had no ability to win and the war brings them nothing but deaths and damage. But they choose to attack or cause attacks because the proxy in the countries have to use their people's blood and lives to prefer their boss.

[@martinfitzsimons5884]

@@annan7728 kind of like Russia using north korea and Vietnam as proxies? And Russian poxy…sorry, proxy little green men to annex Crimea in 2014. Those kinds of proxies?

[@skwisgarskwigelf7191]

Would discount Winnie the Pooh wage war against the US? 😂

[@elmouto3883]

Discount Pooh cannot beat the real Pooh.

[@lamarsmith5971]

The narrator makes the mistake of thinking it's just China vs. USA, when it's really China vs USA , Australia and Japan. That's why China is hesitant about attacking Taiwan.

[@apveening]

Don't forget some more countries close to West Taiwan. The Vietnamese would join as well as they still hold a serious grudge against West Taiwan and West Taiwan definitely came out second best in the last couple of "border disputes".

[@gj8550]

Are you kidding me? Where is US, Japan and Australia going to find the money to fund a war? US national debt is at $35 trillion. The interest payment on that debt is about to surpass its military spending. Some economists are predicting US to default on its national debt within a decade. Japan is on the verge of economic collapse. Being decades behind in EV production, its car industry is losing global market shares at an alarming rate with some companies such as Nisan, inches away from bankruptcy. Japan and Australia export 25% and 32% respectively of their goods to China. Without China, these countries would face severe economic hardship. Do you really think these countries would want to go to war with China? China doesn’t need to go the war with US. It just needs to sit back and watch US go down the path of self destruction.

[@Matthew-gz4oh]

Add South Korea as well.

[@gj8550]

@@Matthew-gz4oh Don’t be silly. S Korea exports 23% of its goods to China. It’d be in severe economic hardship if China stops importing its goods, let alone finding the money to fund a war.

[@JaydenWilliams-my1br]

Australia would not help the US against China over Taiwan because we don't recognise Taiwan as a country, its part of China.

[@binyu-kp3be]

China has never caused trouble but is not afraid of it. China has never provoked a war, no matter how weak the other party is, but it has never been afraid of war, no matter how strong the other party is. China has always been peace-loving and has never engaged in foreign wars or stationed troops abroad, but it has always been discredited.

[@romulosumalnap-mw9vx]

Do you understand what you are talking about? What is China doing in the south China sea?

[@Highspdlowdrag]

O well that explains their navy surrounding Taiwan I guess. 😅😅 u da..

[@MarvinChenFantasy]

​@@Highspdlowdrag Taiwan is a pending war, there's time when Taiwan claimed mainland, it's fair if mainland took Taiwan.

[@b0707y]

@binyu-kp3be I totally agreed with you on that, unlike the U.S. starting a war with Afghanistan because they got oil and the vietnam War, too, and et centra.

[@b0707y]

@romulosumalnap-mw9vx protecting its sovereignty just like you would protect your own property from trespassers, wouldn't you? The same goes as China and any other countries, but haters and racists will always insult China and accuse them of this or that, but I doubt that you would do it any differently if you were to be in their shoes. Best walk in their shoes before you start judging China based on the U.S. racist hateful media about China, yet China continues to evolve and flourish even more.

[@Anglomachian]

“Its power in the pacific has peaked, or is close to peaking.” Actually it’s pronounced Beijing.

[@JMM33RanMA]

A very funny pun.

[@kathrynjaneway5346]

No one cares

[@dyflin3246]

@@kathrynjaneway5346 About your opinion.

[@bcats1309]

When I was growing up they called it P King.

[@angeldomingojr.7538]

It's power is not peaking but faking....

[@xtro30]

Don't concern yourself with China attacking Taiwan. It's economically a lost cause. These vids do make interesting viewership tho.

[@JohnJaneson]

CCP biggest motivator is desperation. With modernization, more and more of their people demand free open election. On the other hand, in the island fortress of Taiwan, the CCP has far higher chance of survival. So, the CCP can be desperate enough to invade Taiwan to try to establish a CCP governance in Taiwan and try to survive through the modernized world, like North Korea and Cuba. Not that we'll give an inch, but desperation is a strong motivator.

[@Dumbo3.1428]

I would like to see government's to get along with each other instead of pouring all this effort into fucking each other up.

[@TheMidnightillusion]

Me too, but that would require world leaders to put their massive egos aside and think of the hundreds of thousands of people who will die all because ONE person wanted a little more power. Russia never needed to invade Ukraine, and China doesn't need to invade Taiwan, but they'll do it because of ego and greed. It's pathetic.

[@olmsfam1]

Wisdom is learning that getting along sometimes results in much worse outcomes. Like a billion people in severe poverty, slave labor, enormous environmental pollution and CO-VID (USA and china funding gain of function research in wuhan).

[@villekuronen6242]

@@TheMidnightillusion or USA never needed to invade anyone

[@wil-zc2iv]

it would not be in the interests of the MONEY that BUYS the govts

[@TheMidnightillusion]

@villekuronen6242 yeah, there are hundreds of examples throughout history of unnecessary conflicts driven by ego and greed. I can't think of a single case where one country NEEDED to invade another. The British empire (along with every other empire) never needed to exist. The only reason it existed was because a few very greedy people wanted more money, power, fame and glory.

[@canolathra6865]

Two major differences between the Vietnam situation in the 60s and Taiwan today: first, we are close allies with Taiwan and have been for a while, but Vietnam was a "fight the commies" war and not a "help our ally" war, and second, Taiwan supplies goods vital to everyday life here in the US. Explain to the American people that China taking Taiwan means no more personal computers, laptops, many phones, hospital electronics, cars, and many, many other items we use daily, and they will support the war.

[@mauisam1]

Thank you. Very informative, keep up the good work!

[@michaelmckinnon431]

I forget sometimes that Japan beat Russia, if they can't take Japan (no disrespect to Japan) then they have no chance against the U.S.

[@blairmarshall544]

I had a few mates in the British army. They all said that if it come to it America could probably fight the whole planet put together on there own. I have no idea if they are right but to say it must mean something

[@jordancobb7553]

Depends on the kind of war... the whole world land mass is too much to spread forces across... but, if all the world united against the US and tried to invade the world would fail, not enough military tech and 7 billion bodies isn't enough for the ammo in Texas alone

[@jettser17UK]

Well I would agree If that was decades ago but by then the Soviet Union were still around to partly act as a counterbalance but the US would have been slim favourites. But realistically in today's world, even a superpower like the US would still struggle against the RotW in a hypothetical scenario.

[@kurtwinslow2670]

The USA is strong, but the American people aren't like the Romans, the public wouldn't support open agression.

[@mendronesg]

what a stupid line of thought. lol No one is interested in invading the US. lmao

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

They were fools then. The USA can't fight a ground war with its infantry against even the Middle East let alone entire Africa and Asia. The population speaks it all. USA just drops bombs with its airforce against 3rd world sh*thole nations. This is why the USA fears Russia and China because they make their own weapons in mass numbers and actually have countermeasures for the only thing with which USA fights it's wars - it's airforce.

[@ChariotOfFaith]

That is the wrong question to ask....The title of your VID should be: "Is U.S STUPID Enough to Start a War With China?"

[@mtf-epislon9555]

Pack warm boys, looks like we are headed to Anchorage

[@RiderOftheNorth1968]

Socks, socks never changes... Wait what?!

[@fishnujish1511]

Fallout

[@ZeroTwo-oni-princess]

Indeed, war is often linked to economic factors, and it can lead to an influx of capital, with money and goods being imported. In some cases, this can result in lower prices. However, the notion that war is beneficial for an economy is a complex issue. While some argue that it can stimulate economic activity, the reality is that war also brings significant costs such as infrastructure damage, population decline, inflation, and shortages. The idea that history repeats itself suggests that another world war could occur. As the saying goes, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Therefore, it is believed that if such a conflict were to happen, the outcomes of past conflicts might influence the present.

[@JohnJaneson]

I think you are right.

[@MrDeek948]

i watch theese videos so much i watched everyone and i learn so much from the millitary show keep up the good work man

[@leiag201]

Short answer YES, because the leaders are getting high on their own supply, and even in the face of all of the catastrophies happening there, they believe they are stronger than they are

[@JohnJaneson]

Agreed!

[@goyasolidar]

China is just like Russia -- a paper tiger.

[@aquagaming3480]

Korean war? Or ww1 and ww2 where USA .

[@MarvinChenFantasy]

So, you don't mind if China sold more paper drones to Russia? A paper J16 maybe?

[@mineralwater6736]

@@aquagaming3480 USA won all those wars. Where is Russia now struggling against Ukraine. 😂😂

[@aquagaming3480]

@@mineralwater6736 won Korean war lost ww1 was won by British and french mostly and ww2 had 70% work done by Soviet 20% by British and other and 10% by USA I think USA could not win ww1 or ww2 if solo.

[@mineralwater6736]

@@aquagaming3480 the soviets without the help from the US would lose ww2. and who China would not be here today if it wasn't for the US.

[@drumsy69]

3 days ago, i saw something on "china uncensored" about the fact that Xi, has not mentioned on any of the headlines or newspapers over the past few days

[@JohnJaneson]

Because he is in beidahe retreat work-vacation. They do that every year. He'll be back in a few weeks.

[@drumsy69]

Winnie the Xi just has a bad headache. He looked at the economic mess and social strife he's created and it gave him a migraine.

[@zl4384]

还有laowhy86？

[@rogerdeyell3429]

Yes , why wouldn't China fight . Play stupid games and win stupid prizes!

[@mikumin727]

both countries would be stupid if they started a war

[@TopNutchbarbershop]

There wont be china after war,

[@TheKrawallkurt]

Im more afraid of the 350 million US citicens whitch 3 guns each!

[@rdrxpzz4022]

U mean 120guns? Lmao it's like a trend to us we basically just have guns for fun and modify each of them how we want like we playing some random car games on our phones😂😂😂

[@Jamesxavier-v4x]

Keep in mind India and Russia would use any distractions with Taiwan as an opportunity to seize the long disputed borderlands 😊

[@MarkoKostelac]

Time to make an Indian/Pacific version of NATO.

[@dillonh321]

Spito

[@tsalVlog]

@@dillonh321 SPoTATO

[@xcase39x86]

Brics?....

[@MarkoKostelac]

@@xcase39x86 I think there was a misunderstanding here.

[@dillonh321]

@@xcase39x86 That’s the opposite of

[@Kitchguy]

It will be messy but the US is s years ahead and more specialty trained with better equipment

[@bruceleewright886]

Sounds like how the Germans lost the war. Better training, better equipment just not enough of it. Numbers count as you saw in WW2.

[@jcoronet2000]

Great Wall of steel eh? Given the historic quality of Chinese steel he probably should have used another analogy

[@JohnJaneson]

Lol true. I have never seen naval ships got shred by a fishing boat until the Chinese ships did it. First time ever. China is the world leader on easily-shreddable naval armor.

[@bobbyangeles81]

Great wall of steel, building in China are collapsing on its own.

[@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle]

When you look at what China has (i.e. thousands*** of land based anti-ship weaponry) and where it is vs what the U.S. has and it being all scattered around the world rather than one location like China, if conflict were to occur near China, it would not be stupid for them. They are well prepared.

[@haroldhahn7044]

Name one Chinese general who got to where he is, based on military accomplishment, and not because his father was a high ranking member of the CCP.

[@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle]

@@haroldhahn7044 you are too focused on irrelevancy. This isn't the bronze age, you need to start looking at logistics, weaponry, what the capabilities are of the weaponry, how much of the weaponry, and where that weaponry is placed.

[@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle]

@@haroldhahn7044 generals would matter if this was a fight with soldiers rather than Carrier Strike Groups vs. land based medium range conventional ballistic missiles.

[@PeaceUnforsaken]

YES. Where else could an Army of 200 million marching down the Euphrates come from? Certainly not Russia.

[@Randywilliams-xy4sj]

If Us put boots on the ground China will have a second thought

[@spartanconscience2693]

Its the other way around. Is the USA stupid enough to start something with China? It should be as its performance on the battlefield is horrendous. After all, the USA's military performance is by far the worst having tied in Korea and losing in Vietnam and Afghanistan. The latter it spent 20 years there and lost to peasants. The most humiliating defeat in the history of warfare.

[@randylee3789]

Lolol..."After all, the USA's military performance is by far the worst" this genuinely had me laughing, because its blatantly false. When was the last war the Chinese military fought?...in fact when was the last large full sized deployment for ANY reason...ask the same question of US soldiers, there's a clear and obvious experience/skill difference between the two countries military's, the US has been fighting wars and minor engagements for DECADES but..... sure bud.

[@thzene4967]

What, lost in Afghanistan? My guy the USA took the country, replaced the Taliban government and held it for basically 2 decades, only leaving because the public was tired of having troops there. If there were public support the US could have stayed indefinitely.

[@thzene4967]

And look at Ukraine. They're fighting a much larger threat than they themselves are but because of Western, largely American, support they've managed to at least hold their own for 2 years. Imagine that in the hands of the original owners/designers who have bases and allies across the globe.

[@spartanconscience2693]

@@randylee3789 For a country that boasts the world's best military its performance in the real world leaves many to wonder. It tied in the Korean war and lost in Vietnam and Afghanistan. The latter to a bunch of hillbilly peasants. And after 20 years. The most humiliating defeat in the history of warfare. The American taxpayer is not getting their money's worth. The US military should lower their battle flags and replace them with women's bras and let the boys and girls scouts take over.

[@spartanconscience2693]

@@thzene4967 No serious military especially one that boasts the world's best and most advanced take 20 years fighting and lose to hillbilly peasants. It never had control of Afghanistan let alone took control of it as the patriots and freedom fighters the Taliban would not let the terrorist forces of the USA take it. How would the USA take on an equal enemy? They would surrender as they could not stomach the massive losses. Staying indefinitely loses its relevance and only humiliates the US military even further. PS-Is it true rumors the US military have begun lowering their battle-flags and replacing them with women's bra's? And are they seriously considering allowing the boys and girl scouts of America taking over combat operations?

[@PrayerWarriorUSA]

Taiwan does not have a mutual defense treaty with United States, and US may find it convenient to back off in case of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. However, the Philippines has an alliance or a mutual self defense treaty with United States and recently fortified its alliance with Japan. Together with its allies the Philippines can call on its brothers to defend sovereignty rights and independence from hostile nations. The only way that China will back off and avoid an all out war is if they drop the 2049 deadline of acquiring Taiwan, how do you make Chika drop their conquest is the ultimate challenge.

[@JohnJaneson]

Aha, very insightful piece. Thank you.

[@profex1646]

If I throw everything I have Chinese in the house, I'm left with an empty house.

[@SantiagoVeraLoor]

90% empty

[@user-qm8sc1jr9u]

bs

[@boonnathan9827]

Well you ain’t too smart is ya.

[@JohnJaneson]

10 years ago maybe.. today, not so much. My stuffs start to have non-Chinese labels.

[@profex1646]

@@boonnathan9827 I don't know what country you're from, but intelligence doesn't get you out of the house. I feel sorry for you.

[@RiggyRonnie]

They will start it when they know they can win, we’re getting close

[@Blizzard-kf3qm]

Don’t forget Xi Jinping also banned Winnie the Pooh.

[@paraweir]

God bless and protect Taiwan 🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼

[@KamBar2020]

Slava 🇹🇼 Geroyam TAIWANESE 🦾

[@宁欢]

我是一个中国人，我可以很负责任地讲，中国大部分人民不在乎独裁与否，把自己的日子过好，不要陷入战争，让台湾回归，这就够了。 I am a Chinese person, and I can responsibly say that the majority of the Chinese people do not care about dictatorship or not. They should live their lives well, not fall into war, and let Taiwan return. That's enough.

[@Ionut.78]

Instead of making war, wouldn't it be better for the two great powers to join hands and collaborate in saving the planet, which they also destroyed to enrich a handful of people? I ask too...

[@wil-zc2iv]

the rich don't want a good thing to come to an end - until the planet comes to an end

[@TokyoBalll]

@@wil-zc2ivI DONT WANT TO DIE

[@JohnJaneson]

We (the US) tried that. In the past 20 years we tried that. They (the CCP) got crazier instead. This whole Taiwan thing is the CCP making the threats, not us.

[@haroldhahn7044]

Just because you have been told that the planet has been destroyed, does not make it true.

[@ChiefBHarris]

I’m about .5% Concerned about China. The score is still 1776 - 0

[@minchan8805]

我有个问题！在西方人眼里，为什么只有他们能享受发达的生活，而第三世界的国家必须要每日为他们工作，中国人要做的仅仅是让西方人回去工作，让贫穷的国家不在贫穷，因为只有在贫穷国家才会有战争和不安，中国人做错了什么？

[@C0MMuN15t-i3x]

Well said

[@mitchpalmer5116]

Of course they are. China is extremely over confident despite their zero war experience and practically no solid logistics system.

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

You don't need experience to fight wars at all. You just throw what you got. That's how wars have been fought for thousands of years. That's how Alexander fought, Napoleon fought and Hitler fought. Did Mongols have any experience ? And this is the modern military we are talking about. A couch potato can kill you with a grenade drone out of the blue.

[@iGizmoTech]

Same thing happened to Russia, all bloat, no substances. They fucked around and found out. the US has the most war experience in the entire world, we know what works and what doesn't. Basically at this point, nothing can topple the US besides the US

[@jamesallenyz431]

They are setting us up to fight each other and will attack us when we're at our weakest. They won't launch an attack unless they know they will win. They are buying tons of farm land near military locations. The attack will be multiple tiered.

[@JohnJaneson]

It is not exactly confidence. Have you seen their movie Born to Fly? There they internally admit to their own people that their military is far weaker than their opponents. Their biggest motivator is instead, desperation. With modernization, more and more of their people demand free open election. On the other hand, in the island fortress of Taiwan, the CCP has far higher chance of survival.

[@applepie7012]

Korean war…

[@briankgarland]

Yes. Because countries on the verge of economic and/or social collapse almost always resort to war out of desperation. No matter how stupid a decision it is.

[@JohnJaneson]

Exactly sir! You know it. This is what most people haven't caught on yet. Yes there was a jingoistic imperialist motivation for PRC to invade Taiwan, but that has ended in late 2023 when they realized they could never win this. But there IS still the desperation motive. And this motivation will not be running out in the future.

[@anthonytrothe334]

It would be stupid to make a contract to defend Chinese against Chinese.

[@joca2903]

notice how no one responded to you...

[@atrothe]

​@@joca2903 Wow Joca (Thats a great name) I am so excited that someone responded to my comment. That has made 2024 for me. Thanks

[@bigpauly2703]

nah but they might be ambitious enough to start one with russia

[@wil-zc2iv]

two losers going at it - should make for an interesting betting line

[@ahmedbader8410]

China cannot be a power, this is a great exaggeration. In fact, China is still in a position where it wants to be stronger than it is. This will take a lot of time for it to become a strong country.

[@JohnJaneson]

Englithened opinion. Thank you.

[@marena3511]

"we will not allow any FOREIGN force .... [to do to us what we do to our own people.]."

[@retro_al2653]

A lot of companies buy products from China and make big profits selling those products on, so it kinda works both ways.

[@thumper7047]

Yes, the easily replaceable bad quality but cheap stuff that could easily be moved to "Made in Mexico". LOL Just because they want to save money doesn't mean they can't be replaced almost as cheap elsewhere.

[@ronaldorussell2138]

@@thumper7047 Foh didn't u read properly, he said sell to china, how much can mexico buy from america.

[@vzig2348]

Nothing will change until the democracies of the world treat dictatorships with the same animosity, dictatorships treat the democracies.

[@Fortnite_Frost_Clips]

I’m more concerned about the tyrant known as Kamila Harris than tyrants like Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin who are half a world away.

[@JohnJaneson]

I'm most concerned if Tim Walz think we should do business with China again. No sir, terrible idea!

[@shecklesmack9563]

Donald Trump: “I’ll be dictator day one!” You: “ugh Kamala is such a tyrant” ????

[@Fortnite_Frost_Clips]

@@shecklesmack9563 mandatory gun buybacks (if they can confiscate your gun what else are they gonna confiscate) the woke left love taking away free speech (canceling and censoring) taxing unrealized capital gains (why would I want to pay for something I already own) tax tax tax and more tax illegal immigrants taking jobs and benefits Kamala releasing criminals back onto the streets instead of putting them behind bars like the prosecutor she claims to be. Kamala has facilitated the border crisis (Kamala was given authority over the border by Sleepy Joe) Kamala hasn’t done a thing about inflation and the so called inflation reduction act is actually a climate bill in disguise. She wants to promoted “green policies” that will kill the American oil industry and she will instead buy oil from other countries that will cost billions to import to the US and cost people more money to buy and put oil American oil workers out of the job. Kamala has flip flopped on all of this but make no mistake the second she becomes President she will go back to the same far left communist positions she had before she ran for president. This isn’t an election about choosing between Democrats or Republicans if about choosing between choosing between Communism or Freedom.

[@kwgm8578]

Interesting analysis. By the way, the video used just before and into minute 7:00 is not of the US Capitol Building, but the Washington State Capitol in Olympia. Many state capitol building are domed like the national capitol in Washington, D.C., but the largest Capitol, on The Mall with the neighboring Smithsonian complex nearby, is unique for the Americans whom have visited.

[@kingjames1308]

'China's extensive military training with Russia' .. so the blind leading the blind

[@aquagaming3480]

Ya like a blind USA go in Afghanistan behind a blind USSR.

[@kingjames1308]

@@aquagaming3480 yeah and in roughly the same amount of time in country Ruzzia lost 16000 men. The US lost 2400. Guess its good for China they have so much fodder

[@thebombcat]

China's first mistake was emulating the Soviet Russian system - with procurement and training...as well as military doctrine. These police states are only good at one thing, appearing to be something they're not. They dump more resources into controlling their population (and their minds) than they do military advancement. Remember, in China to innovate is death. If you stand out you'll be paying (more) bribes and or imprisoned...it does not deal well with people who stand out. This puts them at a massive disadvantage with the, by comparison, a very mentally and socially flexible West.

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

By looking at China today it doesn't seem like their system is flawed at all. They are the most advanced nation on the planet right now. Holding all the critical technology and industrial prowess.

[@Rheinmetall2025]

Yes they are

[@colinlee9678]

If the US chooses to fight a war over Taiwan then it would be fighting as a territorial thief on the wrong side of the law, as Taiwan is the sovereign territory of China and will lose such as war, as the US has never fought a war against any peer or near peer since the end of WW2 and has lost every war against every under-peer!

[@normanhechavarria152]

What people don't like to admit is that this is a problem that has to be solved. And it cannot be solved with people like China's current leader easily by playing nice. That is showing them weakness and encourages them to act out more.

[@joeytorres5442]

I have a brother in United States Marine and a sister in the Navy this isn't like world war II China has missiles that sink ships like aircraft carriers they are so fast hypersonic they cannot be stopped.... It is what it is

[@romelbicoy]

yes indeed, they become stupid because of arrogance and greed

[@thehobo54]

It's been said that "if you are not trading with us, you are at war with us"

[@coldspirit9904]

im glad it was brought out that independents...aka moderates...decide presidential elections...despite the middle not having a platform of their own. im a centrist.

[@JohnJaneson]

Yup. Centrists determine elections. Politicans should take them far more seriously.

[@JohnJackson-e9z]

Remember that about half of communist China's so called "military spending" goes towards i ternal security. In orher words for the communists to repress their own peoplle.

[@simply_exploring]

China should take a cold hard look at how the Ukraine War is going and think twice. Manpower is not merely enough to win a war as we witness with this current conflict. Taking Taiwan, which has a special hatred towards China will be even tougher to take than Ukraine.

[@bingliu-china]

留岛不留人，中国人想要的是土地跟同胞，不是同胞的没必要留情。对敌人的同情就是对自己的残忍

[@ssskkk8734]

好好笑哦，俄乌双方都靠改造从中国买的民用产品打仗

[@robertlaabs5066]

Very Informative! Thank You!

[@laotouaxiong]

Japan did that in 1930-45 lol.

[@bassboostedmusic2386]

well the technology and logistics have changed

[@GregorClegane402]

@@bassboostedmusic2386 Not really if you look at the war in Ukraine

[@tsalVlog]

@@LittleDevil7686 "has nuclear weapons" != "a threat" when the adversary has a thousand times as many.

[@JeremyFerrer]

@@GregorClegane402 Yes. Exactly, look at Ukraine. Look at how the relatively tiny country of Ukraine is managing to hold off one of the world's largest military powers with the use of drones and western intel. Technology has 100% changed the way this war will be fought.

[@bassboostedmusic2386]

@@JeremyFerrer you don’t understand warfare… even Vietnam was able to withstand the Imperial America… modern warfare is different from anything past

[@alexg3228]

Who is stupid is left to be seen, never underestimate your opponent.

[@user-sj8rl6rl6c]

세계 대전이 다가오고 있습니다.

[@k1ngduggerz802]

The smart among us wish only for peace

[@lpcasas]

And the narrative is that China wants war.... Yes, sure

[@dannyshen4284]

Nato and the rest of Europe needs to step up so USA can focus their efforts in Asia where the next front will possibly take place.

[@Youralwayswhining4367]

Whats china the paper tiger doing now

[@JohnJaneson]

Building tofu ships Making tofu missiles More or less

[@shadeblackwolf1508]

My view is that whether the taiwan situation escalates to war depends entirely on the Russian invasion of Ukraine

[@eriknordqvist9016]

The interesting thing is that the US military could beat China, Russia, India, North Korea, Iran by themselves 😂😂😂😂

[@clint9027]

What ? 😂The US gets smoked in literally every war zone it’s been involved in. You guys got beat by dudes in sandals multiple times.

[@Mesopotamia-v6d]

Wait why India is here?,The problem is those countries has the same mindset, they don't need to win they need to make any war with the USA as expensive and destructive as possible for the usa to prevent the war from happing from the first place, ''if I'm going down i will take you with me''

[@salamov963]

​@@clint9027cap

[@icecold9511]

​@@clint9027 No, they just avoided engaging and waited us out. I don't think governments and militaries have that option.

[@seemooreb.9724]

That's why USA is #1, superpower

[@linuxares]

Ahem.... Japan: DON'T, TOUCH, THE, BOATS! I became the land of the rising sun. Twice!

[@Tydorstus]

Ahhh another HLC fan

[@wade04035017]

Chinese leaders are not as stupid as some KZbinrs who believe they can rule this world by making videos.

[@guitarman6632]

Public support doesn't mean nothing, if you don't have any public !

[@rockmanguy6254]

Let’s hope not!

[@Martin-mt3wz]

Should be saying are we stupid enough to start a war with them. We are already on the ground in Russia. All of those tanks and vehicles that Ukraine is using? Looks to everyone like we are already there

[@klainleo4438]

It seem like the KZbin channel is entirely dedicated to propagate anti China narrative .exactly what the western media did to Japan in the early eighties anti Japan all over US and western media is exactly what they doing again to China this time ‘ but you guys we not succeed cause the global south is totally on China side this time .

[@klainleo4438]

It seem like the KZbin channel is entirely dedicated to propagate anti China narrative .exactly what the western media did to Japan in the early eighties anti Japan all over US and western media is exactly what they doing again to China this time ‘ but you guys we not succeed cause the global south is totally on China side this time .

[@deangreen1309]

For the Chinese people's sake alone. Informed Americans are far from worried, and if anything.. are excited at the opportunity to end an era of social injustice in China, FOR the Chinese people.

[@vahangood5999]

I do not know if China is stoopid enough to invade Taiwan, but I am glad I am not stoopid enough to sign up and serve these days. When I was younger, I was considering it. But if I was young again, I would not even consider it. Being deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan is a cakewalk compared to deployments to fight a near-peer. I see more and more young men being wise and avoiding the military - good for them!

[@CarlosRomero-u6h]

Yeap, cannon fodder has had its day at least in countries with free flow of information.

[@FeralDingo123]

China will eat the US for a snack .

[@juliekeeney1538]

Are they desperate enough? That’s what will make them crazy, desperation.

[@Nils.Minimalist]

A war with the U.S. means a war with NATO! Good luck, China! 😂

[@Altonnar]

only if China attacks the US first attacking a piece of land that no one officially recognizes would not trigger article 5 I am sure UK would help cause Australia would back the US. which means Canada. I doubt Germany and France would help with anything other than money. the problem for China is they have no friends that would even give money to them they would be totally alone.

[@Acrillian]

NATO's weapons arent that good the war in Ukraine proved that

[@Altonnar]

Are you seriously saying this as Ukraine with Natos weapons are literally pushing Russia's shit in go simp for Russia someplace else😅😅😅.​@Narge.

[@jaycc3365]

@@Acrillian Ukrainian 1980's M1A1 Abrams with basic steel armor < 2024 updated M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams with the depleted uranium armor

[@apveening]

Wrong guess, the NATO only covers the North Atlantic, it is in the name. The only way West Taiwan could get into conflict with NATO is if ruSSia became a member (impossible at the moment due to an ongoing international conflict) and West Taiwan declared war (either de jure by formal declaration or de facto by simple invasion) after that.

[@phillipheaton9832]

China's 335 ship navy has an average tonnage of 5,600 tons. America's 232 warships have and average tonnage of 19, 800 tons. The US navy can project power anywhere; the vast majority of the Chinese navy is very short ranged.

[@shuili666]

China is twice the size of the US in terms of industrial capacity. Japan was 1/10 of the US during WW2. So basically, the US is dealing with Japan x 20 in Asia, 8000 km away from the US homeland. Think again, who’s stupid in starting a war.

[@donaldtrumplover2254]

Chinas navy is not up to par, and since they have to be on the offensive it makes the situation 2x harder for them. You also forget what goods they are producing when you say “two times larger industrial capacity”. That statement means nothing when you cannot produce military goods at the same scale. Tell me, what exactly are they leading the US in producing?

[@shuili666]

@@donaldtrumplover2254 you’re still living in the 90s. First, it’s not the Chinese navy who’s on the offensive, it’s the Chinese rocket force the US navy is going to fight. It’s not that hard to press a button and hunt an aircraft carrier 2000 km away these days. Second, in case you haven’t noticed, modern fightings are unmanned now and China produces 90% of drones in the world. In war time, such production capacity would quickly turn into military potential. Finally, it’s not only military equipment or experience that matters, if so, the Nazis would not be defeated. Instead, it’s the whole production of society that matters for a lasting war. You don’t expect a China US conflict to end within 5 years, do you? It’s going to be a disaster 10x worse than WW2. The US homeland would be recked. Tens of millions would die even without nukes. And the US and its allies would lose its ego anyway in the end for the reason I mentioned, they don’t have enough industrial power and man power to compete. Industrial power is what really matters for world wars. Sorry, Trump lover, but fighting China is not an option for the US. The US had better think some other ways to pay its national debts.

[@donaldtrumplover2254]

@@shuili666 The amount of assumptions and complete ignorance of modern warfare in your little essay is insane. Firstly, there is no proof that a capable navy can be easily defeated by rockets (Ukraine doesn’t count as Russia has always historically had a terrible navy and still do). Secondly, you completely ignore the fact that it is the Chinese that will have to be on the offensive. The US would never fight offensively and rockets would never hit US soil since that would be a waste of resources. Now on the other hand US rockets would have a strategic reason to shoot that far. While China is also not oil independent and the United States is. They would be short on resources from the beginning to the end. Manpower is also a non factor in naval wars. Also, your world war 2 arguments don’t work because the Soviet Union was heavily supported by the allies and had a larger military at the start of the war.

[@donaldtrumplover2254]

The Chinese would be on the offense because the United States has zero strategic goals on mainland China. Essentially, any war that will start will be started by them. Taiwan is probably the best example of a flash point. Also, I could not read the rest of your reply as it was deleted. KZbin does that crap to me all the time.

[@ronalds899]

If Kamala I'd elected, yes.

[@wil-zc2iv]

Kamala doesn't have BONE SPURS

[@BishopHowell]

Love is just a word until someone comes along and gives it meaning.