Is Claude 3 OPUS the New King for Academic Research?

Exploring the latest in AI technology really feels like stepping into the future. With tools like Claude 3 OPUS and GPT-4 on the scene, writing and research are hitting a whole new level. When we dive into writing with Claude AI, it’s clear that this isn't just about typing up papers faster. It's about how these tools can think alongside us, offering insights and support that push our projects beyond what we imagined.
▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter
Join 19,000+ email subscribers receiving the free tools and academic tips directly from me:
andrewstapleton.com.au/newsle...
▶ Become a Master Academic Writer With AI using my course: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Use my Ultimate PhD Kickstart: 12 Point Success System for Aspiring PhDs to start your PhD strong: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ My best KZbin advice curated into an an easy to follow course, Effortless Academia: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Applying for a PhD? Get my FREE PhD application resource pack to apply with confidence: www.subscribepage.com/freeapp...
▶ Learn what I wish I had known before starting my PhD in my ebook bundle: academiainsider.com/ebook-bun...
Let’s break down Claude 3 OPUS vs GPT 4. Both tools are giants in the AI world, but they each bring something unique to the table. Claude, crafted by Anthropic AI, seems to bring a fresh, maybe even safer approach to AI interaction, which is super important considering all the concerns about AI going rogue. Then there's GPT-4 by OpenAI, which has been a favorite for a while because of its ability to handle a ton of different tasks.
When we talk about Claude vs Chat GPT, it gets even more interesting. Each AI has its own vibe. Claude might be the new kid on the block, but it’s designed to be really safe and user-friendly, focusing a lot on understanding and responding in ways that seem more human. ChatGPT has been around and has proven itself to be super reliable, especially when you need a variety of responses or creative ideas.
The involvement of Anthropic AI in developing Claude really highlights their goal to make AI that not only works well but also thinks about how the user wants to use the technology.
With Claude 3 OPUS and GPT-4, the possibilities for what you can create and discover seem endless. It's like they're not just tools, but partners in the quest for knowledge. This could really shake up how we tackle projects and open up new ways to think about and interact with information.
................................................
▼ ▽ TIMESTAMPS
00:00 What Is Claude 3 Opus?
00:36 Claude Opus 3 Text Generation
01:21 Can Claude Opus 3 Reccomend Papers?
03:42 Claude Opus 3 Image Recognition
05:01 Claude Opus 3 Mass Image Upload
07:06 Claude Opus 3 AI Image Text Extraction
08:36 Claude Opus 3 Analytics
................................................
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED ACADEMIC TOOLS AND SERVICES
▶ Recommended Apps, Books and Courses: academiainsider.com/recommend...
AI TOOLS
▶ Best PhD Writing Tool - Writefull - link.andrewstapleton.com.au/w... (Get 10% off with my link)
▶ Chat with PDFs, Websites and more: HeyGPT - heygpt.lemonsqueezy.com/?aff=...
▶ Best Literature Search - Litmaps - app.litmaps.co (Get 10% off with code STAPLETON)
▶ Best Literature Review Writing Tool - Jenni.ai - jenni.ai/ (Get 20% off with code ANDY20)
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED KZbin TOOLS AND SERVICES
▶ VidIQ - vidiq.com/drandy
▶ Camera - Canon EOS 650D amzn.to/3aDOog6
▶ On camera mic - amzn.to/3iMTzx0
▶ Webcam - amzn.to/43a8YyP
▶ Shotgun microphone - amzn.to/34gzcUX
▶ Portable recorder - amzn.to/3kUzF53
▶ Lighting - amzn.to/2YgbAfv
▼ ▽ Socials for shorts and reels
Instagram: / drandystapleton
TikTok: / drandystapleton

[@chunnaiyamspo5062]

PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED.

[@jessy2161]

!!!!!!

[@mannyd-y5246]

!!!!!

[@jazzli81]

I have been using both AI platform. Personally, I prefer Claude than chat gpt for research purposes. Number of reasons but few things that I like it in most, summarization and the quality of written work. There is no over praising word on Claude for rephrasing sentences. Also better understanding whole document rather than gpt. Anyway I am satisfied with Claude.

[@Dominik-lc4pl]

How does Claude compare with Gemini on rephrasing text?

[@jazzli81]

@Dominik-lc4pl still Claude is better. Also, I am using a Gemini advance as well. Gemini is good at suggesting a better idea. However, written work or rephrasing quality is less than Claude. There were a lot of over praising word and unnecessary summarise the sentnece. Also, if you want to have a longer word count, gpt and Gemini create inappropriate content in order to fulfill count, but I found Claude was doing well for it too.

[@Dominik-lc4pl]

I recently used up my Gemini Advanced free trial while I had to finish up my thesis

[@blackgptinfo]

Absolutely the flowery wording in gpt sucks even when asking not to do it

[@user-rd2gu3xg7e]

Definitely agree

[@user-fo8ty3kc4v]

Not only do I love your videos - it's your enthusiasm and the way you communicate and express yourself with real demonstrable examples. You make it easy for me to understand complex technology.

[@TaofiqAdeyemo-uq5no]

Hi, that issue can be resolved by giving the affected papers a shorter name. It will work. Then try to remove any special characters.

[@FoxOkinawa]

Claude is still responding with fictitious sources/references!

[@lokidoki471]

i find it best when you supply it with your own research that you've gathered.

[@SaaSLTDDeals]

Wow, the comparison between Claude and chat GPT is so thorough! It's fascinating to see the strengths and weaknesses of each platform for research purposes.

[@olivesostetrica3453]

I'd absolutely love to have you as my lit review supervisor! I'm doing my first undergrad lit review on human factors in maternity care and haven't got a scooby where to start, we keep getting conflicting and confusing advice. Our supervision has been a major let-down regarding quality at my uni. We only get to submit two pieces of 500 words for assessment. I understand they have many other students to look at, but how it's set up/organised will inevitably let the students down. I think either AI programs or the links you've kindly provided are justified in this instance, but I will try chatGPT, so thank you for your review! 🙂

[@lc2c177]

Leónidas from 300 would be jealous of that beard. Majestic.

[@tedtan2754]

It works best when subscribed. Worth the money so far.

[@vugar_ibrahimov]

Great tutorial as usual and Game Over ChatGPT ??? Even free version of Claude is now my favourite tool now, it is better than Gemini too. The answers it gives sounds more natural and human.

[@africanscholarcorner6072]

Andy, you are simply awesome!

[@jamalnuman]

Thank you for the very informative content. It would be great if your time allows to explaisn the following two queries: - When the following terms are synonyms and when are they distinct? 1) Purpose, aim 2) Objective, goals, scope, 3) Justification, motivation, importance 4) Problem statement, gap, rationale, hypothesis 5) Problem, issue, challenge, obstacle, 6) Drawback, pitfall, drawbacks, shortcomings, disadvantages, cons, limitations, weaknesses, 7) Contribution, significance, novelty, originality, innovation 8) Theoretical framework, conceptual framework, study framework, study flowchart, etc. 9) Thesis\dissertation 10) Preface, background, overview, context, executive summary, 11) Conclusion, summary, etc. - What is the most common sequence of sections in the the dissertation\thesis structure in the introduction chapter? 1) Overview (context\preface\etc.) 2) Problem statement 3) Aim 4) Objective 5) Questions 6) Scope 7) Contribution 8) Thesis structure

[@whatisrokosbasilisk80]

Honestly kinda funny how well its memorized certain papers - sometimes can even reproduce the DOI, WITHOUT internet access

[@hodhod9069]

Hi Andy, Just wanted to give you a solution to get rid of pop up massage after uploading a pdf. It is all about the name of the pdf. If it consists of " -, _, " this massage will show up if you change it to a simple name it will be fixed. :)

[@DrAndyStapleton]

Thanks for that!

[@pavloshevchuk2454]

Andy, thank you for keeping me up with AI technologies.

[@DrAndyStapleton]

My pleasure!

[@ferfromla]

Tried to use it but it was impossible for me to use it as the registration process didn't work. It sent me a code on my phone but the code never worked.

[@jackmaxwell3134]

Other disadvantages of Claude compared to chatGPT: - the message limit: you'll hit very frequently. And it will ask you to wait for 5 hours (!) to ask again - the chat is really basic: you can't cancel an ongoing text generation, you can't quote part of its answer, LaTeX NOT SUPPORTED !!! etc...

[@tar-yy3ub]

the message limit changes literally hour by hour for different users based on how much people are using Claude, so often better than you describe but sometimes worse!

[@citizen3000]

They really need to match the features of CHAT GPT as soon as possible.

[@chrisb.1621]

Please do a video about Meta-Analysis and KI. Thank you.

[@bgill7475]

I’ve been using Claude since last year, it’s amazing what they’ve managed to accomplish in this short amount of time.

[@jeremiasrobinson]

I asked Claude to recommend sources and provide citations too, but it did hallucinate. It gave me the names of real authors of similar papers, but with made up titles and dates.

[@jeremiasrobinson]

Claude also told me it didn't have the ability to read PDFs. I told it that its webpage claims it can. It apologized, but still refused to read my PDFs.

[@rajanvk939]

Thank you 🙏 Andy for this wonderful content. Can you also make a comparison video of Gemini Advanced with chatGPT-4 for Research Context

[@mansoor.ashraf]

I have found Claude to be much better at chatting with pdfs. Though it does not have access to the web.

[@michen25]

1:35 😂 crazy!

[@gaboshkaboi6885]

Agreed! I wanna hear more!

[@sakibhossen00]

How can I upload files in Chatgpt??

[@michen25]

5:43 😂

[@i.aliende2088]

Are you comparing with the 4 version of ChatGPT?

[@davidvalencia6256]

Claude is much better with long pdfs, and he writes in a more objective way. I hate chatgpt's pompous way of writing.

[@blackgptinfo]

By the way i am talking about claude opus it is dope

[@Vlr-nn2bk]

Unfortunately not available for many countries

[@zemlya378]

get a vpn

[@whatisrokosbasilisk80]

Use brain and VPN

[@mzahmed6533]

Any AI that creates research model?

[@blackgptinfo]

It absolutely is for qualitative. I created a structure prompt system for theme coding of transcripts. I also created a method for cross checking with snap assessments from humans and theme consistency with chat gpt

[@ahmedmostafa247]

Chatgpt and it's plugin ❤ Game over

[@tedtan2754]

Also, in what AI universe is Andy in that have chatgpt allowing the upload of images and documents? Is he comparing the paid versions or the free ones? Also, most of these tools allow you to reprompt them to give more detailed answers or to retry a different style of answering. Maybe he should have a disclaimer that the comparison he performs are based on the first/initial prompts. Because he uses an entertaining format of presentation, such nuance could be lost to audience with 3 min attention span.

[@emileigh6524]

In the paid version you can upload files etc. I do it lol.

[@rediffusion7996]

You've good teeth. Is it veneers? Can you provide the link to your dentist?

[@andresvillalpando3776]

Difference in buying ChatGPT 4 vs AI free tools.

[@kolarek]

Dear sir, you are my hero!

[@TT-xg7qd]

How to bypass plagairism?? Please need of it

[@sajida5310]

Hahaha 😂 heary ear 👂🤣

[@citizen3000]

Why are you shouting at us?

[@fpgaguy]

You're papers are too complicated, lol