Is DIVORCE the unforgivable sin? | Andrew Farley

[@reginaplatt7877]

Wonderfully spoken Andrew! May God Bless You for Your Good Work!

[@houseontherock8345]

Over three years and my heart still agonized over my divorce 😔. I’ve tried in prayer so hard and at times it almost happened. But she moved out of state recently for a very high paying job and even placed me in the dreaded friend zone. I remember the woman at the well who was married 5 times. I remember that those who are forgiven much love much. I remember Jacob’s continuing struggle with sin. I have such a hard time reconciling this in my heart when we were so close to restoration. Lord forgive us and forgive her. Have mercy on us both. Lest we should parish. May your will be done. Maranatha

[@jjjohnson8623]

Great word, teaching, counceling, people need study, show selves approved unto God, workman who needs not be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. Need learn repentance means to change ones mind from being without Christ to accepting Him into their lives To become that new creature, new creation by the Spirit + Word of Father God!

[@rahuldsouza2855]

Its remarriage while your spouse is still living that's the real Adulterous sin . The problem with this type of sin is that to be forgiven, one has to repent(remorse) and forsake sin. With regard to divorce, The Bible recommends a separation for a while if it becomes impossible to live with an unbeliever. The hope is always that you will be united again and through your life the unbelieving spouse might become a believer. This idea that we can remarry while our spouse is living is a modern day invention not found in the NT. God Bless

[@Thomas116-m2n]

Nope. Though it isn't a preference, remarriage was very present in those days and was allowed in some cases. Adultery (see Matthew) and abandonment by a non-believer (see 1 Corinthians). When a spouse commits adultery, it can break the marriage bond. When a spouse departs, they may depart and the believer is not under bondage (not this person's slave nor are they tied to them anymore, thus freeing them from that covenant). Paul mentioned this as there would be no need to just tell them that they no longer had to live with that person as they would have no choice in the matter anyway. Several misunderstood verses have caused legalistic (especially a certain denomination) groups to demand that those who are divorced and remarried leave their marriages unnecessarily.

[@robsonbass6058]

My wife of 20 years decided to dump me because she became a bit of a feminist. I tried, through the church, to come up with some sort of plan. She would have none of it. I was unsure of my feelings for her after three months of this and prayed to God that if one would not come back to free the other of their feelings. One week later I realized I had zero feeling for her*. Two weeks later I met the woman of my dreams. That was 21 years ago and she and I have been experiencing 20 years of marital bliss, as well as two bonafide healing miracles in that time. One should not divorce, but if your spouse dumps you, well, there you are. Now what? The God of Christianity became flesh that we can know that he knows what it's like to be a human being living in one of these incredibly needy bodies. I choose not to judge how others tackle the challenges that brings other than to protect myself and those for which I am responsible from any potentially destructive decisions they may make. *my litmus test for this was to imagine her having sex with another man. It resulted in no emotional response from me. I have a VERY high libido. Staying single was not an option, and neither is the Mustang Ranch.

[@jjjohnson8623]

Rahul Dsouza Wrong. Get a Strongs exhaustive concordance with the Hebrew + Greek definitions, look up repentance, + all other words to be sure they were translated properly from the Original writings into English by more than one person. Many worked on translations + took away or add what they "thought" or "preferred" the scripts to say. 2Timothy 2:14~17. God bless!

[@jordan7985]

@@jjjohnson8623 curious what is the definition of repentance. I'm genuinely asking :) Ty brother

[@bryantotten7315]

I have never properly understood this from a christian point of view.thank you Mr farley

[@MaxTheManTV]

No, blasphemy against the holy spirit is the unforgivable sin

[@kickpublishing]

Remember the context thoungh - it's only unforgiveable in that if you reject the work of the Holy Spirit through Jesus then there is no forgiveness left for you - i.e. Judaism is no longer a means to salvation, because Christ is the end of the law for righteousness (Romans 10:4). I once knew a poor fellow covinced he was damned because he had used the term Holy Ghost as rhyming slang in his past - thats pure nonsense.

[@jeffreyhunter4966]

It's so outrageous how so many people misinterpreted that it's an unpardonable sin because Jesus wanted to hold it against the religious leaders for thinking that his power was satanic. I mean come on get real Jesus doesn't hold grudges

[@peteschlamp7365]

I agree with the conclusion but its easier to support the other view biblically and Andrew didn't do much via references to support his view.

[@exceedinglyBlessed1]

Pete Schlamp did you mean that he is suppose to quote bible verses and scriptures?

[@peteschlamp7365]

Yes, otherwise it is only an opinion. We all have opinions but are they biblically based?

[@stephenfuller5614]

Mark 3:28-30.

[@mrprosperity1]

divorce happens but it is what happens after. remarriage compounds the negative consequences of the divorce. if a woman divorces remain single or reconcile; do not marry a divorced person

[@utubemedward1]

No divorce doesn't just happen; marriage is a covenant in effect until death; you must reconcile your covenants; divorce does not end a marriage; it doesn't do anything; Romans 7:2 KJV; Luke 16:18 KJV.

[@johnnylucas1929]

Thank you Sir!!!! Good Expl...

[@ajlouviere202]

The divorce and remarriage for adultery doctrine is based solely on the supposed guilt of the wife in Matthew 5:32 and 19:9. However, the wife, in the above scriptures, is clearly not guilty of fornication because the Jews (that Jesus was speaking to) were still living under the law, and if fornication was discovered, there was a moral obligation to report the offender according to Deuteronomy 22:13-24. The wife, who would have been found guilty of fornication, was subsequently stoned to death, according to the law, which had still governed the Jews up until Christ's death on the cross. The same for a woman caught in adultery, according to Leviticus 20:10. How could a wife, guilty of fornication, or adultery, under the law of Moses, be given a writing of divorcement and be caused to commit adultery with whosoever marries her, that is divorced? Jesus is clear, in these examples, that the wife is not guilty of fornication, but is still caused to commit adultery if she marries another man now that she is divorced. This is the only way that Matthew 5:31-32, and Matthew 19:9 keep harmony with Romans 7:2-3, and 1 Corinthians 7:39. Unlike the synoptic gospels of Mark and Luke, which were written to evangelize the Gentiles, Matthew was written to the Jews, and has of 24 characteristics that identify it as intended for the house of Israel. The ancient Jews called the betrothed (engaged) "husband" and "wife" according to Deuteronomy 22:23-24, Matthew 1:18-25, and Luke 2:5-7. Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage) was never for fornication or adultery. Allowing those guilty of fornication and adultery to remain living and become a prospect for remarriage was against the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22:13-24 and Leviticus 20:10, which commanded that those who were found guilty of fornication and adultery be put away from Israel, and stoned to death. The law of Moses was not given to the world, only to the Jews. From the exodus, to Christ's death on the cross, the law of Moses governed the Jewish people. Christ's death on the cross caused the Jews to become dead to the law of Moses, so they could be joined to Christ under a New Covenant. This is what Jesus's fulfillment of the law of Moses, including Deuteronomy 24:1-4 (Moses's precept of divorce and remarriage), means. Paul gave several warnings to Christian believers against keeping the ordinances of law of Moses as justification, over following Christ and his commands under the New Covenant with Christ. Keeping the ordinances of the law is no longer possible, for Israel, and that is why Christ prophesied that the temple would be destroyed. These scriptures make it clear that if you choose the law over Christ, that you must keep the whole law: Romans 7:4, Galatians 3:1-9, Galatians 3:10-29, Galatians 4:1-7, Galatians 4:21-31, and Galatians 5:1-15. Being unequally yoked to unbelievers is not a cause for divorce, once two become one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, according to 1 Corinthians 7:12-14. Many one-flesh covenant marriages between unbelievers are recognized by God in the scriptures, most notably the marriage covenants between Herodias and King Herod's brother Philip, Potiphar and his wife, Ahab and Jezebel, and Ruth to her deceased husband Mahlon by Boaz when he took her to be his wife. Some are teaching that 1 Corinthians 7:15 implies that those who are abandoned, by an unbelieving spouse, are "no longer bound" in a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The reason this is in conflict is due to the way some translations word it, which gives it an entirely different meaning, and context. 1 Corinthians 7:15, says, "But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace." As you can see, the actual scripture says "not enslaved" which means that the husband or wife is not enslaved to sin with the unbelieving spouse, and is free to worship Christ in peace. Subsequent translations have changed the words to imply that they nullify the marriage covenant, which is not at all the case. The issue that this creates is with 1 Corinthians 7:10-11, which says, "10To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife." As you can see, those who claim 1 Corinthians 7:15 shows the Apostle Paul giving those who are abandoned permission to remarry, do not understand the command that Christ gives is to an abandoned husband, in 1 Corinthians 7:11, and that he "must not divorce" his wife, and his wife is commanded to "remain unmarried or else be reconciled" to her husband. The theory that 1 Corinthians 7:15 nullifies two as being one-flesh, due to one's unbelief, puts the Apostle Paul directly at odds with Christ, and himself, by implying that Paul has issued an opposing command to verses 10-14 in verse 15. Some also teach that 1 Corinthians 7:27-28 is referring to both divorced men and virgin women, and not exclusively to men and women (virgins) who have never been married. This has been falsely taught for some time in churches as referring to anyone who is not currently in a marriage, which, for them, also includes those who are divorced. This is a very false assumption, and puts these verses in a different context, that is at odds with both the teachings of Christ and the apostle Paul. We see Paul refer to virgins, which signifies the unmarried who have never before been wed, which is the proper context here. We see Paul saying clearly that it is good for virgins, which is also speaking to never before wed men here, "that it is good for a man so to be." He goes on to say, "Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife." Who is he referring to here? Men who, like himself, have never married. The word "bound", in these verses, is a clear reference to betrothal (engagement) and not to a one-flesh covenant of marriage. The ancient Jews were considered bound as husband and wife during the betrothal (espousal/engagement) before becoming one-flesh in a covenant of marriage, through consummation. This is affirmed by the context of the term "bound" seen in Numbers 30:14-16. The Jewish couples in ancient Israel, who were betrothed (engaged) were also bound together until death, either by execution for fornication, or by other causes. Then Paul says, "But and if thou marry, thou has not sinned", which is who? The men who had never married in the congregation at Corinth. So he begins with verses 25-26 speaking exclusively to men that have never married. Paul then says, "and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned", which is speaking directly in regard to virgin women who have never been married, within the congregation, not divorced women. Notice that verse 34 says, "There is difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman careth for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit: but she that is married careth for the things of the world, how she may please her husband." Paul speaks plainly when he says "there is a difference between a wife and a virgin." Paul goes on to say, "But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry." This is speaking of a virgin who has become of age to bear children when it says, "let them marry." This is a clear command, to a single man, who has taken a virgin to be his wife. Paul then says, "Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well." This is referring again to the single man who decides it is better not to marry, but to stay betrothed (engaged), under the present distress, by saying that he "hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin." Paul then says, "So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better", which again means single men, in the congregation, who have betrothed a wife, do well if they marry, and those who choose not to marry their virgin brides do better, under the current climate. For more proper context of the word "bound", let's look further down in this chapter to verse 39, which says, "39The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord" (1 Corinthians 7:39). For so long, these scriptures, between verses 25-38, have been twisted and used to enable divorce and remarriage, by wayward churches and teachers, and have caused many to stumble and to be trapped in unscriptural unions. The use of the woman at the well, in regard to marriage, falsely implies that Christ was endorsing remarriage after a divorce. This teaching is in defiance of Matthew 22:23-28, which shows a woman who had been widowed seven times, and entered into each subsequent marriage without any scriptural conflicts with God's law of marriage (one-flesh covenant) seen in Genesis 2:23-24. Mark 10:1-12 and Matthew 19:1-12 both record Christ's teaching that day beyond the Jordan. There is no mention of the words "fornication", "writing of divorcement", or "divorced" in Mark's Gospel because Mark was not written to the Jews (as Matthew's Gospel was), but to evangelize the Romans, and likewise Luke to evangelize the Greeks, who had no knowledge of the law of Moses in Deuteronomy 22 or Deuteronomy 24. All of these facts draw a clear understanding that remarriage after a divorce, under the New Covenant with Christ, is a scripturally false and baseless teaching. Please use wisdom when living in any situation against what the scriptures command.

[@derekgeorgeandrews]

Thank you for your channel and your thoughts. I got divorced because my ex wife cheated on me three years ago. We never had children. We were both over it when she left, so the divorce was easy. I am almost 40 and still hope I will have a family some day; however even though my situation fits the exception, there are still some who say I cannot remarry. My current thinking on this is: God knew that it might not be good to never allow for divorce, but he also knew that if he spelled it out too clearly that that would be taken advantage of. The end result is that anyone who comes to faith and is concerned about it, will be extremely careful in their future decisions, and maybe that's the best possible answer. Which means to me I will never have a truly solid answer on whether it is right or wrong as a given rule like a commandment. And God in his wisdom does not want me to have such an answer, because then I would take decisions I make in this area of my life less seriously. So I'm just leaving it up to him. I am not seeking a second marriage, instead I am seeking God only. But I can't seem to completely let go of that hope for a wife and a family.

[@bksusmc]

Wow, on point brother! Good word. Balanced.

[@JonathanGrandt]

Isn’t unbelief the unpardonable sin? I mean it makes sense. God can’t simply forgive you from not believing in/on Jesus........

[@SavedbyGracethroughFaithAlone]

Jonathan Grandt good stuff brother

[@shadowmist1246]

No because the unbeliever can believe later. Biblical references to unpardonable sin would be Matthew 12:31 (blasphemy against the Holy Spirit) and Hebrews 6:4 (rejecting Christianity after being one).

[@craigdrury4756]

Is eating to many big macs the impardable sin

[@sorenpx]

LOL. I legit laughed.

[@markdalton3900]

no you will not be healthy

[@craigdrury4756]

@@markdalton3900 😊

[@utubemedward1]

This is still wrong; If you abandon your spouse and refuse to reconcile; then you have unrepentant sin; it's only unforgivable if you won't reconcile. Romans 1:31 KJV ; Covenant breakers are worthy of death.

[@TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsLW97]

Ditto

[@Genesisapple5]

God died for our sins so we could repent and stop sinning.... Grace is given once we leave our sinful lifestyles. You cannot expect to be forgiven and still continue to sin all you want. That's the impression you're giving me. If I were you I would re read the bible instead of mis leading pple.

[@redpillrevolution6066]

@David Justice Please, quit using the terminology of the people who perpetuate this nonsense..."adulterous marriage." There is no such thing as an adulterous marriage. Yes, there is adultery, but no adulterous marriage.

[@shadowmist1246]

Practical living advice: Get a divorce only if your spouse committed adultery (can forgive but the marriage is still broken). Get a separation agreement and stay single if your spouse is abusive or abandons you. If you separate from your spouse and they become one with someone else, then change your separation into a divorce and you can get remarried. This is consistent with God's view of marriage and is consistent with God's view of repentance because it allows the abusive or abandoning spouse to repent and reconcile if they had not yet committed adultery.

[@sorenpx]

Not bad. Perhaps a good, biblical solution to the dilemma.

[@evinevlin5124]

Only a married man or husband is allowed to divorce his wife if she has sex with other man (sexual immorality), she has been defiled and died against her covenant marriage. Husband can remarry a woman who never been married or virgin, not allows to marry a woman who is divorced. (Matt 5 : 32, 19 : 9) a married woman or wife is not allowed to divorce her husband even though he is adulterous, abusive, abandon her. But if she forced to depart or divorce him, let her remain unmarried (stay single) or reconciled to her husband (a wife should pray for repentance husband and reconciliation and restoration of covenant marriage, thats God Willing)

[@shadowmist1246]

​@@evinevlin5124 The principle applies to both men and women. If the man has committed adultery, the two are no longer one and if the woman committed adultery, the two are no longer one. There was a reason why Jesus allowed for divorce for adultery because it ties directly to his own definition of marriage.

[@markdalton3900]

@@evinevlin5124 no virgins anymore and i wouldnt ask anyone that

[@miya6008]

I would have liked to comment on the thing you did about willingness to sin when talking of homosexuality, I am a Buddhist not of your faith or belief system however I respect everyone’s right to belief and religion. I personally have an issue with the argument that gays are willingly sinning, I love my boyfriend and feel extremely happy to be his. Willingness to sin would be partaking in sin while being consciously aware, I do not wake up every morning thinking of how I can sin or make your god mad. I barely even think about being gay, it’s just who I am.

[@projectg408]

I don’t at all intend to just sound mean here... and I’ll start by attesting that as a believer I have endured many years of my life wrestling with the agonizing and horrifying thought that I’d committed that sin, and I’ve now been set at peace about it. But... I honestly just struggle t see how anyone can apply this interpretation to it. I’ve seen this question before and it honestly seems like it should be pretty hard to interpret the passages about it as alluding to anything about divorce. If you’re fearing that you’ve committed this sin, first I doubt you have, because you care. My best interpretation of it is that the blaspheme of the Spirit is represented by such an outrageous, outspoken, vehement blackballing and rejection of the Truth of Christ... AS the actual Holy Spirit is ministering this truth to you and knocking on the door of your heart... something like that. It’s not any one thing you say or do, and it has nothing to do with what you’ve done to with other mere men.

[@jakeweesner9168]

That's how I've always took it, as the rejection of Jesus' sacrifice 🙂

[@jeffreyhunter4966]

Absolutely dude. That's why 5 months ago or so I've heard Jesus's voice saying to me "Jeff, there is absolutely no sin that I could possibly hold against you. It's impossible for you as a Christian to commit blaspheme of spirit. Always have faith in me. Don't let Satan throw flaming darts at you''

[@legomeego8581]

5:42 FALSE PREACHER ALERT Be you therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. Matthew 5,48

[@darrylshack2909]

The problem is you aren't perfect. You sin like the rest of us. You will die like the rest of us. "If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness." 1 John 1:9. What part of "ALL" don't you get. If you sin by divorce, God will forgive that. You don't have to pray every night for him to forgive you of divorce. If you had to do that you make the real God a liar and you don't know the real one.

[@legomeego8581]

Keep reading 1st John specifically 1 John 3:6-9 and tell me again if christians sin 'like the rest of us'. Does ALL include the ones that say Lord Lord? Read Matthew. Better yet, read all the parables where believers will be judged. To find them, just read every scripture which says there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth and you will get a better picture of what the word "ALL" means. All means those that ABIDE in Him. Those who abide in Him do not remain sinning. AND I WILL SAY DEPART FROM ME ALL THOSE WHO PRACTICE INIQUITY.

[@jjjohnson8623]

Kenneth MacLeod Perfect in the Greek original writings of this passage "means to mature, from child under governors + tutors into a mature heir. 2Timothy 2:14~16. God bless!

[@SavedbyGracethroughFaithAlone]

JJ Johnson amen As many and I mean MAJORITY of Christians are trusting in SELF to get right,be right and stay right with God,trusting in SELF and not Christ as ENOUGH!!!! ETERNAL SECURITY baffles a worker of the Law of Moses,as they worry more about others sin than their own sin,they don’t truly get a grasp of Grace better yet they OUT OF CONTEXT butcher the Word to fit into their context I mean look at the word repentance,they butcher that,grace,another one as they believe eph2:8 links to works in James??? They see works as part of salvation instead of salvation produces works A fruit of salvation is works,they twist it and mix JUSTIFICATION with SANCTIFICATION ,EVERYWHERE As they are the FRUIT inspectors and I’m sure they will be inspecting this comment Pssssh I am not a righteous person at all,I truly don’t want what I deserve as do ALL,that is hell oh man,yet by His grace(UNMERITED,UNCONDITIONAL LOVE)He saved me!!! From me,from hell,that if I BELIEVE (faith) that JESUS is enough ,that I have the promise of ETERNAL SECURITY,like the filthy thief on the cross,WHICH I AM!!!! Are you???? Oh righteous one!!! I trust in CHRIST ALONE!!!! Be blessed brethren IN CHRIST JESUS Not here to throw scripture grenades at a brother in Christ already set in his own way,that gets us nowhere as pride is the opposite of humility but I will say,Andrew Farley is a rarity in the Body of Christ in this day and age,as he RIGHTLY divides the Word,truly standing on the true gospel of grace and I believe he is hated by the SELF righteous,most believe in SELF over Christ,Farley keep on brother!!!!!

[@MA6HINE]

@@legomeego8581 Yes. Furthermore, if the person that activates the divorce with no reason for the divorce, they are not in the word of our Christ. They should be prepared to finish out this life's journey not fornicating AND not remarrying. To remarry is daily adultry. How does one repent from remarriage? This is will full sin. It is a believers free will to not follow scripture. Free will is designed by God for believers to choose Him. These believers are not believers. We are not called to challenge Jesus to forgive us for anything we want to do because it feels good and boosts our ego and builds our pride. Now, flip it. A so called believer divorces their believing partner and goes out into the world. IF the Christian's that are true followers would keep the word of God and not hook up with this divorced believer, that divorced believer would only have the unbelievers to hook up with. Those unbelievers should be with that unbeliever. Thus, they are not of the body of Christ. He will say to the challenger's, "I never knew you". Those adulterous people have no fear of the Christ. They impose their will on to Jesus. That is how Satan fell. We are called to prepare for our King and the Kingdom to come. Believers in Christ fear and follow. They also rely on Christ's grace and mercy. No works replace grace. Our love and reverence of Christ and the Holy Spirt direct our path. Thanks Kenneth.

[@princeneo777]

Andrew Farly.. You keep on saying on this or any other video that we are under grace and not under the law. Yes we are not under the law but on the law of Moses only.We have been forgiven by the Father from all our inquity through the death of Christ on the cross.We are under grace yes of course but it doesnt mean that there is no law anymore becuase we are not under the law of Moses but under the law of Christ to establish the law of the Spirit. Christ came for a better law under His authority through the baptism of the Holy Spirit. The early Christian churches have their laws but not under the law of Moses but under the law or commandments of Christ through the Holy Spirit. This early churches will not be built if there is no Christ command in His ministry before and after He seated at the right hand of the Father and at this present age.

[@Mr1bigsal]

When you remarry you are under sin every day unless your 1st husband dies

[@frame3139]

You’re WRONG, I committed adultery ( I’ve been forgiven) I remarried a unbeliever, all this took place in a back slidden state, so you’re telling me I’m living in sin when GOD says I’m forgiven and NOT to divorce my unbelieving wife cause she’s made holy, as is my daughter cause of my faith. You’re view of God is flawed, to say the least

[@vannellssaaden7810]

@@frame3139 Bigsal is not telling you anything. Almighty God is the One telling you. Bigsal didn't write the word of God. At the end of the day God has given you the choice to obey Him or not. If you choose to disobey Him by staying in an adulterous marriage, that's your choice. Just don't expect to spend eternity in Heaven when u are clearly disobeying God's word and getting angry on top of that. Take it to God. Dare you raise your voice at God? because He is the One ur angry with. It is plain and simple. According to scripture if you are married to someone else whilst your first spouse is still alive you are committing adultery. Period. God says you are an adulterer/adulteress whether it is before or after your backslidden state. It is your duty if you call yourself a christian, to do your necessary study of God's word on this topic to make sure you get it right because your eternal soul is at stake. Many so-called christians are deceived. In the following scripture Paul warns us to...not be deceived. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor ADULTERERS,, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. By your response to Bigsal it is crystal clear that you have totally misunderstood and misconstrued the word of God. In other words you don't understand the scriptures at all. Ppl who like to do their own thing love to twist and turn God's word all how to be able to do as they please and live comfortablly in their sin. Hell is not a comfortable place at all and this will not help you on judgement day. I can assure you that YOUR view of God is extremely flawed if you think He will allow you to disobey Him and then walk through the pearly gates like nobody's business. Really? For a clear understanding and clarification on this topic I advise u to pull up Divorce and Remarriage by David Pawson on you tube who did an in depth study of the subject. If you want the truth that is 🤨

[@CementFactoryNutrition]

@@vannellssaaden7810 interesting . Finishing reading 1 Corinthians 6 :) . God bless

[@renearosser1466]

No

[@utubemedward1]

Yes, if you refuse to reconcile your covenants. YOU"RE NOT TO DIVORCE AT ALL!!!

[@maryfarag1665]

👑❤️

[@denisethomson7685]

Under the law we are bound to remain married unless adultery was the cause ,none the less it's a hard heart that brings one to divorce. Under grace we are not under the bondage of the law of marriage . If a unbelieving wife or husband chooses to leave we are not obligated to remain married . God hates Divorce too be sure.

[@ajlouviere202]

Unrepentant sin is not pardonable.

[@Mrs.T504]

what was Paul's thorn in the flesh? Guess he is in hell too. Take a breath buddy.

[@shadowmist1246]

There's a lot of unnecessary confusion about divorce. Divorce is only a state issued certificate allowing someone to re-marry. It is not a sin by itself. Divorce for adultery is fine and is not sin. Divorce for any other reason is bad because it can lead to adultery. Divorce and separation are essentially the same with the former being potentially more problematic because of the "perceived" permission to remarry.(ie cause someone to commit adultery).

[@evinevlin5124]

Matthew 5 ::32a, 19 : 9a Jesus Lord says to married men or husbands. He uses word Exception for Fornication/sexual immorality. He stated these : 1) a husband is not allowed to divorce his faithful wife 2) a husband is allowed to divorce his wife for she has sexual immorality commits sex with other man and living together in adulterous relationship. She has been defiled and died against her covenant marriage. husband can remarry and he does not commit adultery if he remarries a woman who never been married or virgin. But if he remarries a woman who is divorced he commits adultery.

[@jeff7888]

Don't watch that other man's program.

[@s1mplecsstreamscs2]

Sir was it good to merry a Devorced women from her unbeliever spouse...

[@princeneo777]

Divorce can be unforgivable if someone is not following the commandments of the Holy Spirit as the commandments of Christ and in the New Testament churches.