Is Florryworry STILL the Master?!!

[@derekskelton4187]

I think the random nations works so long as they are similar power levels, and Ajam and Scotland are close enough

[@lyall1412]

It might seem a bit unfair to give 2 random nations. But given this situation and how close these 2 competitors were, I dont think it really matters. both had many opportunity's to get monument levels. Also im pretty sure the hosts have thought deeply about which 9 nations they could pick to make it a bit more even. Great idea. Awesome videos.

[@speed5official]

Thank you kindly! yeah, we want to keep it exciting and give the players a challenge for real and just see how they solve it! :)

[@pisasupayani]

@@speed5official so giving them a random country isn't enough and it HAD to be different for each of them? Looks to me like you guys are reinventing the wheel by bringing back a problem in such sandbox games which makes it difficult to judge skill of a player with another

[@culkaiy7395]

touch some grass @@pisasupayani

[@sicksock435446]

@@pisasupayani Ask yourself is this supposed to be a clinical and objective ranking of player skills or something that is fun and entertaining?

[@Magier2010]

ggs to florry again, I had a bunch of chances to win, but just ran out of time at the end, could have even bankrupted to finish the papal monument Also, I didnt no cb florence instead of the pope cause florence is in the hre...

[@scorpioneldar]

real nice play here. got unlucky with the start but you made a fight of it.

[@minecraftherobrine1234]

You did well bro, congrats

[@LilGamingYes]

There's no shame in losing against Florry when you put up such a good fight. Being close second to a God makes you a King! ;)

[@sicksock435446]

When facing Florry you should probably Worry. :P

[@regina.phalange.]

I love that you guys made it random, it's more fun. :) stoked for monday's stream!

[@thenamesianna]

This was great !

[@eacey_]

I like the quasi-random nations. They were clearly chosen for a reason. The list is never going to contain like the Ottos and Ulm

[@scorpioneldar]

but it apparently includes Ottomans, Poland, Rothenberg, and berg. ulm may not be there... but that hardly matters when 2 1 province HRE states are. (and yes I know they were different sets. but there is no indication they couldn't all be on the same set. plus nothing in the game is on the level of early game ottomans. PLC is probobly one of the closest but still they never had a real chance.

[@TDudePro]

@@scorpioneldar the nations are probably picked based on the challenge. I doubt Rothenburg is on the board for this one

[@strategystuff5080]

the production value is very good

[@FlatDerrick]

My Scottish strategy would have been similar to Laiths. Go straight for Gotland, then Dalaskogen mines, then upgrade the mines (possibly while selling everything in Scotland except Lothian), then upgrade the two other monuments or if Copenhagen/the Stave Church looked like an easy grab go for them.

[@U.Hansen]

Many people seem to dislike it but I am actually in favour of the random nations for both players. A bit like poker, make the best of the hand you are dealt. Yeah, sure, some runs are very unbalanced and you wont win every round. In the end, it will be the skill of working with a situation that you haven't encountered before that will make you the victor of the whole tournament. Also, two (very) different playstyles together is just more entertaining to watch, in my opinion.

[@boranblok]

And even with the same nations. Lets say both got scotland, and one gets surrender of maine and the other does not. Suddenly its two different games again. As long as the random nations are somewhat similar in power level it does not matter that much and adds flavor.

[@U.Hansen]

@@boranblok Also very much true!

[@scorpioneldar]

@@boranblok but you see with nations like ottomans in the list they Aren't. there is nothing on par with ottoman in the early game and they only have an hour. PLC V otto in the first vid made a mockery of the concept of "equal competition" the polish player never had a chance.

[@urmother212]

@@scorpioneldarhabibi obviously had an advantage but the plc player managed to go bankrupt and lose half his land and didn’t exploit all the cultures in Riga and the crusader states or in russia or even in the hordes

[@sicksock435446]

@@scorpioneldar I mean their positions could have been reversed so it's fair in an arbitrary sense.

[@scorpioneldar]

so I think scotland is the stronger nation but Ajam has more access to greast projects. will be interesting.

[@DrLottaBurg]

How can this be a 60 minute challenge but the video is only 17 minutes? I don’t understand.

[@scorpioneldar]

editing.

[@phillipealmeida5643]

Nice battle. Bad Outfits. Why that? Cheers!

or make it so both player have the same nation

[@pisasupayani]

This is so unfair and unbalanced. You can give the random countries but at least make it the same for both

[@trivane626]

If it was so unfair then why were they so close to beating each other, if anything scotland had a better chance at winning with how many monuments are in europe

[@regina.phalange.]

Nah scotland and ajam are on very even ground

[@pisasupayani]

@@trivane626 thats the problem with this format, it will take away from the wins as it is impossible to credit the win purely to better play

[@pisasupayani]

@@regina.phalange. that's your opinion and that's the problem - it becomes a matter of opinion and becomes lopsided

[@TDudePro]

@@pisasupayaniit’s a competition for entertainment, not an Olympic sport homie

random nation is very bad, you should not do that

[@strategystuff5080]

one thing I would say is that Red Hawk needs to stop saying ""Uh hu, and Hmm" after his co-caster says stuff.

[@Daniel-qt6xi]

Two random nations is so dumb, why would you do this

[@speed5official]

The suspense and to see two differnet playstyles! And beacuse it's fun ^^

[@ranulf1295]

you could also try adressing them in a non-agressive way, this is free content man