Is It Time To Change The Supreme Court And Can It Happen? | Business Insider Explains

[@SadBoysCollectiveCirca96]

at least theyre no longer attempting to hide that they want to pack the courts

[@giglioflex]

The court was already packed by republican. Any move to expand the number of justices would only serve to bring the view of justices in line with voters.

[@SadBoysCollectiveCirca96]

@@giglioflex how can you at all say that when kamala usurped any sort of prelim? that doesnt sound like its in line with voters. cause there were none. the left are such hypocrites

[@SadBoysCollectiveCirca96]

@@giglioflex it would only serve to bring things in line so you can usurp power, as is the demonrat way. heres a cool idea, less federal gov and more state inependance? as the constitution was intended

[@josephprice1623]

@SadBoysCollectiveCirca96 they aren’t hiding it but they’ll still deny it

[@ILikeFreedomYo]

Insurrectionists

[@PercalTM]

If it was liberal leaning their wouldn’t even be a conversation from the Democrats. Same goes for conservatives lol. It’s how divided this country is.

[@hans_pixel-me5mx]

Oh what an easy and uninformed statement to make.

[@Labyrinth6000]

ALWAYS been. I mean they both went to war with each other in the 19th century.

[@19katherine1213]

The point is they’re not supposed to be leaning on ANY side

[@SpaceOutlaw_]

Supreme Court is suppose to be impartial. It’s totally not. Bipartisan politics have divided American and simply isn’t working.

[@paulm.1652]

Bro they shouldnt be corrupt like Clarence Thomas, thats the Real issue here

[@kristen21023]

BI is really showing their true colors.

[@electrikoptik]

Dear business insider, just say you are very left leaning and would want a supreme court with only very left leaning judges.

[@RicFlair-yn1mm]

They just did without saying it outright 😂

[@cwaddle]

But lefties are clean and righties are corrupt, thats the truth

[@Labyrinth6000]

Not surprising.

[@19katherine1213]

Criticizing them for being right leaning is not advocating for them to be left leaning. They’re not supposed to lean on any side. That’s the problem with people these days. It’s either your side or my side 🙄

[@jonathanjones3126]

​@@19katherine1213the roe versus wade decision was actually correct in returning the decision to the states

[@logicVSpassion]

Supreme Court needs to just follow the constitution. Period.

[@thor.halsli]

They do

[@tkdmike9345]

Thats the neat part, they already do

[@adenwellsmith6908]

And the left need to follow the rules of democracy. If you want to change the constitution put forward the ammendment and see what the electorate thinks.

[@GameFuMaster]

that's the whole point of the supreme court

[@edwardp.shikles7251]

“Uh-oh, the SC isn’t doing what we want for our side…we could completely change it, maybe?”

[@charleshetrick3152]

The last time Team Blue changed the Supreme Court we went from 2/3 confirmation to 1/2 (thank you Harry Reid) and now we have a conservative court so maybe Blue Team should just let well enough alone. Also solid timing on publishing this video, you’re not motivating your base your agitating your opposition

[@adenwellsmith6908]

2-3 more conserative judges should help.

[@ChristopherPowell-g5y]

Bigger court, more processes more government spending. Then more Taxes, people don't want more government. They want less government and less taxes, more freedoms and money to create and design their own lives.

[@TheMrFiredragonheart]

Nothing sounds like more freedom than to take away the freedom to get an abortion. Hypocrite

[@ChristopherPowell-g5y]

@TheMrFiredragonheart There are things called condoms, for both people, there are pills, all kinds of contraceptives. Most available totally free now.

[@SadBoysCollectiveCirca96]

@@TheMrFiredragonheart murder is bad. kinda gross to support it.

[@ChristopherPowell-g5y]

I never even said anything about abortion, I merly stated that everyone is sick and tired of being taxed to their knee's to create a government that is as big or bigger than it's own military, which is assinine!

[@JohnDoeTheTroll]

@@TheMrFiredragonheart Nobody took away women's right to murder babies, they simply moved it to the states, where it should have been in the first place.

[@gothemknight]

Yeah, Business Insider only produces left leaning content. I do like the other stuff about items made around the world, because it highlights what people do to make something of themselves. Stick to that Business Insider.

[@19katherine1213]

Business insider isn’t the supreme court or anything. They can lean anyway if they want to. If you don’t like it then just don’t watch 🤷‍♀️

[@SpaceOutlaw_]

Did business insider lie though? As an independent, I’m appalled in the courts ruling in that the president is above the law. Nobody should be above the constitution. We might as well be a dictatorship at that point.

[@IronskullGM]

@@19katherine1213 Keep defending the Yellow Journalism and Oligarchs of the Modern Gilded Age, see how that works out for you...

[@RicFlair-yn1mm]

How come it's always time to change the Supreme Court when rulings don't go the Democrat's way? 😂🤣😅

[@stevenporter863]

The Supreme Court is not supposed to meet approval ratings, that is the point.

[@TheMrFiredragonheart]

Did you miss over the part where McConnell stopped a nomination just so Trump can get his in? Sounds like he wanted the change. No media literacy snowflake 🤣

[@BrodyYYC]

​@@TheMrFiredragonheart that's politics. You just started paying attention now?

[@peterthomas187]

@@TheMrFiredragonheart We need ONLY justices who understand the Constitution is NOT a living document. And unfortunately, leftists refuse to accept this existential fact.

[@tommypain]

Exactly. The same people that whine about not getting their way when a Supreme Court ruling is handed down, are the same people that vote unfavorable for the Court.

[@teakcore5261]

The woke mob is afraid, that’s when you know you are doing good!

[@stevenporter863]

Exactly

[@MillBRoo]

Afraid of what? They don't win anything regardless, unless they forget about Palenstine

[@jeanclaudejunior]

@teakcore5261 You're weird according to Tim Walz

[@19katherine1213]

Every sane person is concerned not just the “woke mob” of how the SC has become so politically biased

[@visionofLOVEstory]

No it’s fine

[@stevenporter863]

It always illustrates how uninformed the people who say the Supreme Court outlawed abortions by reversing Roe vs. Wade. All they did was correct a 50 year error by sending the decision back to each individual state as it should be. According to the constitution the federal government really has little power outside trade and a national defense, anything not explicitly assigned as a federal power is automatically sent back to the states.

[@josephprice1623]

Oh no someone’s worried about the election

[@afyounie]

The purpose of the Supreme Court is to rule based on Constitutional Law. If you don't like the ruling, then let your House Rep or Senator know and they can put forth legislation to change the law. Stop blaming the president or justices for the poor performance of the legislature. Whether 50% of the US agrees or not is of no consequence. Maybe people need to remember what they were taught in highschool about the three branches of the US government.

[@braddavid902]

But can’t the court strike down any law congress passes?

[@mattmurdock5424]

Alternate Title: The Supreme Court isn’t doing things we personally want, so it’s time to change the rules so we can get our way

[@EinWochenedeImAusland]

strongly against reshaping the court

[@stevenporter863]

The idea of a SC is not a popularity contest and to be changed to accommodate issues and trends

[@rd9102]

The Supreme court DOES NOT EXIST to have high public opinion. The laws of the nation CAN NOT be based on the social landscape of the time period and social acceptance of the nations people. The Supreme court DOES EXIST to interpret the laws of our land. That folks like or dislike what the Supreme Court does (usually in the case of Abortion) is of little importance. The reason the Court is a Right leaning court now is because of the refusal of the Left leaning Justices that stayed on the court until they were on their deathbeds and not retiring when it was prudent to do so and unfortunately they died while there was a Conservative President. As an independent (former Democrat), too bad. The system is what it is and it works and there is no realistic way to change the system and no reason for the change other than to try to "win". There is also no reason for it, the law is the law and those are the breaks.

[@ma32851]

After careful consideration, I've decided to unsubscribe to 'Business Insider'. Sorry you guys, but you've gone over the left edge and fallen on the floor. Goodbye.

[@TheMrFiredragonheart]

They are just reporting. You are so scared because they said democrat 🤣. Snowflake

[@zufalllx]

​@@TheMrFiredragonheart Thanks for demonstrating you don't understand the concept of a snowflake lol

[@dillononcewastudor6599]

To answer the videos question, no it shouldn’t be changed to fit political changes. That’s the point

[@guiller2371]

Let's believe the judges are very smart people who truly know the law. We can't be better on judging them. All we need to know is that they have good moral character and the best interest for this nation.

[@Jake-Day]

“Business” Insider

[@Ju379an]

Yes… I think the same.

[@Zero_xvxv]

Senate currently 50/50, VP tie breaks ....time to change reform the Senate. LOL.

[@jonathanjones3126]

The get a constitutional amendment passed....

[@danielantonio1635]

“Republicans can win elections, time to change how elections work” - business insider, presumably

[@mikeyang6003]

The SCOTUS justices shouldn't be above the law.

[@19katherine1213]

I agree reform is needed. The SC shouldn’t be leaning towards any side. Also having no age limit is insane

[@jonathanjones3126]

People always have biases, agree with a age limit as long as it applies to all elected/appointed officials. Maximum age of 55

[@L-8]

Allowing states to make their own abortion laws isn’t “leaning towards any side.” You can find countless Supreme Court rulings that support liberal ideologies, but you only complain about the rulings you disagree with

[@AlanHinson]

@@jonathanjones312655 is a really dumb number. Is that you when you think people retire? At minimum the number should be 67 which is the retirement age. With that being said the entire purpose of lifetime appointments is for the judges to not have to focus on re-election and be non partisan… so it wound be unconstitutional to even change that.

[@jonathanjones3126]

@AlanHinson it is well known how fast people degrade past that point. Currently quite a few politicians are way to old to the point where they should have been forced out decades ago. Bureaucrats shouldn't be allowed to be in government for more then 5 to 10 years , no more then elected post in their lifetime or being appointed

[@AlanHinson]

@@jonathanjones3126 I don’t believe in turnover like that, 5 years is way too short. I mean think about the presidency, how much do presidents really accomplish in their first term? Bc most presidents come in and get whatever was given to them, it’s not till years 3-4 where you see some change. But usually you don’t get the full effects of a presidents policies until their second term (if they get one). Which is why I think every president should get one 8 year term.

[@Gorindakia]

Proposition: Justices serve 10 year terms, each party gets to elect 4 serving justices and one is democratically elected either during the presidential election or midterms depending on when their term is up 🤷‍♂️ seems reasonable. The people get a say for any ties and it’s balanced between the parties

[@shamrock141]

The Supreme Court being a lifetime appointment was an abysmal decision, in terms of anti-corruption protections that's one of the worst things you can do because once a justice is appointed there's no big reason why he/she should give a damn about the consequences, which makes it far easier to buy them out

[@SpaceOutlaw_]

When the founding fathers made these rules, people didn’t live that long 😂

[@Angeleschacon-s8i]

Thanks for keeping us updated! I feel sympathy and empathy for our country. Low income people are suffering to survive and I appreciate Mr Craig Percoco. saw him on KZbin You’ve helped my family with your advice. Imagine investing $4,800 and receiving $15,460 after 6 days of trading.

[@JacoboBergesTorres]

Diversification and understanding market dynamics are crucial, especially during uncertainty. Monitor both positive and cautionary signals, or consult a professional expert.

[@Nelia648]

As a beginner investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Craig Percoco is my trade analyst, he has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.

[@AlfonsoRodríguez-p9u]

I don’t really blame people who panic. Lack of information can be a big hurdle, I’ve been making more money passively by just investing through an advisor, and I don’t have to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my finances remain secure. So I really don’t blame people who panic

[@RominaLara-h4f]

Without a doubt! he is a trader who goes above and beyond. he has an exceptional skill for analyzing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. his strategies meticulously crafted based on thorough research and years of practical experience

[@Josefa-743]

Nice! Once you hit a big milestone, the next comes easier. How can I reach him, if you don’t mind me asking?

[@attackofthewindmills]

The foreign policy that the Democrat party has is going to lead to high military spending, in spite of that, our home border and coastline force is going to be weaker because of Kamala’s global military focus. The world is multipolar which means we can no longer dominate as the only superpower for various reasons. The most viable approach is to form stronger alliances which lends itself to a Trump style foreign policy in which diplomacy is first without sacrificing a very strong military capability. Kamala Harris isnt able to be the type to project her presence to lets say North Korea. Its nothing on her but its more to do with ability to have adversaries respect but also befriending them. Saying that, the peace with a strong military is how you achieve greater stability in the middle east. Diplomacy and a strategy is very important due to the need to have dialogue. This is the path to peace in the middle east. We are in a new era and we do not think “turning the page” has anything to do with addressing this era. Its just another way of saying we are doing the same thing differently. We cant have that. Its very important that we have a Trump doctrine otherwise we will have nuclear wars. The two areas that should have never been hotspots are the Levant area and Ukraine. Both are expected to expand- this statement is extremely dangerous and should be underlined in bold

[@stingray427man]

Ginsberg dies, yep time to pack it 🤡

[@DelectableDays]

I feel like I’ve seen this exact same format and editing style of documentary a thousand times before. Like you could replace insert any subject and it would be the exact same message.

[@IronskullGM]

George Washington warned us about the dangers of partisanship and political parties in his farewell address. Power to the People not the State or the Party...

[@GraphicJ]

This video is utterly ridiculous. It's only "time to change the supreme court" when it doesn't agree with your crazy politics. "Business" Insider my ass. Time to unsub.

[@Semper_Iratus]

No

[@psp785]

Trump 2024

[@JessicaBrenda-qc1gg]

I'm favoured financially with Bitcoin ETFs approval, Thank you buddy.$28,600 weekly profit regardless of how bad it gets on the economy.

[@RudeYard-h7l]

YES!!! That's exactly his name (Steven Hatzakis) so many people have recommended highly about him and am just starting with him from Brisbane Australia...🇦🇺

[@FabianJames-z6g]

He's my family's personal Broker and also a personal Broker to many family's in the United states, he is licensed and a FINRA AGENT in the United States.

[@BatJav]

This sounds so good and i would like to be a party to this, is there any way i can speak with him?

[@BatJav]

Thanks for the update I'll get in touch with him right now😊

[@JapanBrother]

Omg 😮This is the kind of information that we don't get from most KZbinrs I will get in touch with him right now

[@DangerDave-e7u]

Who types like that?

[@jakelevinson7802]

It just hasn’t been what it’s supposed to be. They don’t represent the people and they haven’t in a very long time

[@matthewroper9972]

Would you be complaining if it were Democrat leaning court. I do not think so. The people elected Republicans and as such Republicans got to put more court members on the bench. Democrats need to stop whining.

[@ranjithchowdary1691]

Chief justices never be change

[@adenwellsmith6908]

More conservatives. 4 more years for Trump.

[@Dank25]

The answer probably isn’t expanding the size of the court.. But what do I know about the American justice system

[@kameljoe21]

You do know they hear very few cases due to time. If there were 100 then they could hear more cases and rule on those cases.

[@auro1986]

there in america they have federal reserve then what's use of a court?

[@GiasoneP]

Scary take.

[@slimpickens8644]

No it’s not

[@Musthavetrav]

Business insider should leave the country

[@matthewroper9972]

Won't be changing the court anytime soon, lol

[@awesdrew348]

Should just change your name to activist insider.

[@TheRahsoft]

since you have now demonstrated your own bias rather than be impartial , people are going to wonder if you have the same bias with all your videos rather than practice impartiality( which is what makes a good business video), never mind that you appear to have copied another channel as well.

[@ferrari888889]

You wanna change it because it is not working for you

[@adamn7070]

What the ... I couldn't UNSUBSCRIBE fast enough

[@Far-East-Beast]

Time to unsubscribe

[@Ju379an]

Sorry but the human sacrifice has to stop

[@chadwaynebradley]

Unsubscribe.

[@najeefilms]

Disgusting

[@mamandapanda185]

This has what to do with business? Propaganda. Own your likely sponsored bias.

[@jeanclaudejunior]

@mamandapanda185 The only propaganda around here is you and Twitter

[@mamandapanda185]

@@jeanclaudejunior Really? Define propaganda, and then tell me how what I'm commenting is propaganda. I'll wait.

[@jeanclaudejunior]

@@mamandapanda185 YOU. You're the definition of the propaganda as well as freaking Twitter. Because you're weird

[@VictorContesBlackSon]

Bunch of mazons there, anyway. People think getting them outta there would work but you would get even more plants

[@misterhat5823]

Looks like the trumpers got triggered.

[@Labyrinth6000]

No, it can go both ways if one party gets into power and pack it even further. Also, Roe was NEVER a constitutional right to begin with, it just women who want to have no responsibility and sleep around.

[@TheRahsoft]

if I remember correctly ruth ginsberg warned that the roe vs wade decision was unsound and that the govt would need to codify it, and yet the democrats for all their bluster..... didn't.

[@af9162]

That invalidates the women and children who are assaulted. R*ped or due to inc*st. It is not for women who “sleep around.” Men also “sleep around,” but there is no discouragement for that?

[@tkdmike9345]

Woke mod hate following the rules

[@OneShadeofBlack]

How does this DIRECTLY relate to business?? This is a business channel, not a politics one.

[@njr1222]

Of course it is. Britain's new Labour government, has decided to end hereditary peers sitting indefinitely in the House of Lords (upper chamber) in Parliament. Tony Blair's first term in government began this process back in 1997. It's been a long time coming and much further electoral reform is warranted in the years ahead. The trick is how to commit to effective reform without falling for cronyism.

[@hoshi411]

Thanks for coming out of the closet, BI. enjoy your unsubscription 😂 🤣 Hope the $50k from Harris was worth your whole channel 🤷🏼‍♂️ if you got less you were ripped off 😂 everyone else getting $50k 😆

[@BusyBodyVisa]

Remember the Warren court? Now its our turn

[@pablogarcia12343]

Business Insider is a joke

[@ILikeFreedomYo]

Insurrectionists

[@kameljoe21]

9 to 15, We need to go even higher than this. There are so many cases that are coming up that need rulings. We need 100 plus and and a panel of 12 with 9 voting, with 3 as alternates so that they can be excused or absent.

[@acevedobrooklyn]

UnSubscribe in one second

[@hans_pixel-me5mx]

Yes, time is to fix the court. It, as the sign says, illegitimate.

[@tankeswardas8175]

Hi

[@greenplanet4432]

Let Palestine be free and boycott Israeli products

[@RicFlair-yn1mm]

@@greenplanet4432 nope

[@TheMrFiredragonheart]

Bot

[@mikeywestside8509]

The only reason why Palestine exists is because of Israel's sovereignty

[@sgntredfluff117zeus8]

Who is Palestinian? Never was a country named Palestine. Only the land of the canaanites.

[@greenplanet4432]

@sgntredfluff117zeus8 oooo same to your land 🤣

[@reynoldslacybrleroymeuschke]

!!I just switched up my Roth IRA to 50% SCHD, 25% SCHX, 25% SCHG, and my Roth 401k is 70% vanguard S&P 500 index, 20% vanguard growth index, and 10% vanguard international index. Seeking best possible ways to grow $350k into $2m+ before retirement.

[@reynoldslacybrleroymeuschke]

how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally.. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?

[@BBN111]

Dude blamed his wife? 😅 Weak! 👎🏼

[@andrewj9831]

How? So if the garbage didn't make it to the curb in time, and his wife was suppose to roll them out before work...the guy takes the blame??

[@awakethemaster]

DOJ ITS LIKE 🇵🇷🗑