Is the Ford Ranger Better with 2.7L EcoBoost V6? 2024 Ford Ranger Lariat V6 First Drive + MPG Test

[@TheAntinowherelane]

I'm a die hard F150 5.0 guy, but this 2.7 Ranger sounds like an absolute rocket with those numbers. 400TQ is no joke.

[@volvo09]

The 2.7 is plenty of power for me in the F150. When I went truck shopping I was set on the 3.5, but I went on a 2.7 test drive first and said holy crap this is perfect! Plenty of power for towing, and I don't tow super heavy, or up long hills so it's good for me. It must move in the smaller ranger.

[@freedomisntfree_44]

Might have been fast in the old models but this one weighs right up there close to an f150 now. I wish they still made them 3800 pounds and 4 door for the midsize trucks.

[@66racer]

​@@volvo09 Agree, when I got an f150 2.7l loaner I was surprised how good it felt down low. I thought it was the larger V6 till I checked the info on the truck. My Ranger with the 2.3L by no means feels under powered and allows for some fun but I would have gotten the 2.7L if it was an option in 2021 because " Mo powa baby!"

[@eliweatherford4154]

I have the 5th gen ranger with the 2.3 and just did a cross country move and man I’m so surprised at how well it handled it. Pretty much 23 hours straight of towing uphill going highway speed the whole time essentially. Gas mileage sucked but realistically towing 2-3k lbs it makes sense

[@realbigtuna667]

​@@volvo09 The 2.7 is the engine to get. Compacted graphite iron block, closed deck, forged offset and fractured rods, and forged pistons. Lighter, more compact, more efficient and more durable than the 3.5L. Don't sleep on it.

[@alvilla701]

I think Ford should also offer a 6 ft bed

[@scottlaird1650]

What is the deal with this 5 foot box trend? And no extra cab anymore…brutal

[@gtrance3567]

Bed extender.

[@zb6618]

@@gtrance3567😂😂😂

[@scottlaird1650]

@@gtrance3567 that doesn’t give you covered secure storage…. My skis don’t even fit in a 5 foot bed, ridiculous……

[@gtrance3567]

@@scottlaird1650 I get it. Mt bikes can be 6.5 to 7 feet long. Just the way it is. You can always look for a truck with a bigger bed. That’s what I did.

[@slmjake]

Awesome truck. But wish it came with a 6 foot bed

[@shanes481]

I'd like one of these 2.7 rangers. Cheapest ones (XLT) seem to be in the mid 40s. I can't bring myself to pay 900 a month for a small truck.

[@motormossvlogs1450]

$900 a month for a small truck 😂😂 your brain dead for sure.

[@MeliorIlle]

@@motormossvlogs1450 It would be about 800, that is still insane.

[@derfderfson]

​@@MeliorIlleI think he was agreeing and doesn't realize it looks like he's calling Shane brain-dead at the same time.

[@Rosada_]

Thats about the fuel economy that I got with my new Ranger V6 the other day on a 120 mile trip to the farm and back. With a tonneau and eco mode, I got about 24.3 MPG at Texas Highway speeds (75+ MPH) so I'm pretty pleased with it. I definitely agree on the lane keep though, its super aggravating but I've kinda been able to touch it just enough that it doesn't complain at me too much.

[@haroldbeauchamp3770]

Much better than my old 2001 Ranger 4.0 4x4 with 4.10 gears. Highway speeds 70 mph net about 17 mpg and 2600 rpm’s.

[@Combat556]

I really enjoy your “real world” reviews, no hype or fluff, just keeping it real. Thanks from Southern California, and a Honda Ridgeline owner that’s considering a new Ranger with the 2.7.

[@Hardisk2007]

Got mine yesterday and so far I’m loving it!

[@ronaldmcclellan9835]

100% agree about the lane keep assist. Finally shut it off in my Super Duty about a month ago and found peace. Nice little truck, I'm a fan of the Nano engine and its "choose your own adventure" nature of good milage or towing/hot footing it around.

[@Kjhgr01]

I have been waiting for this video for a long time! Thanks!

[@TruckKing]

More to come!

[@frankmartin1325]

If you worry about the tiny fuel tank, Long Range America offers 30+ gallon fuel tank upgrade!!

[@RidersInBlack]

Great video Steve. The 2.7 is one of the best engines Ford has made in the last decade. Along with the coyote. It's been fairly reliable and returns good fuel mileage compared to its power. That's what I would get..I wish they had a 6 foot bed option since some of its competition offers the same. Ford I know you're watching. Please give people more choice.

[@rjdavis7503]

What do you mean fairly reliable, Rider? The 2.7, along with the 2.3 are completely reliable.

[@jrdamanat]

@@rjdavis7503 Not really. The 2.7 EB is a completely different beast than the 3.5 EB and maybe the 2.3 EB. The 2.7 EB is made from carbonized graphite iron which is stronger and lighter than steel. It was moreso made to be a racing engine but put in the F150's. Along with good reliability (with 2019+ engines; earlier models had a good assortment of problems that thankfully got ironed out), they are DRASTICALLY built different AND better from the other EcoBoost models. If I were to go for an EB engine as an option, the ONLY one I would go for would be the 2.7 EB. Built quality is better and it won't break the bank when it comes to repairs neither. Even the turbos on there are cheaper to replace than the 3.5 EB.

[@jeffw8841]

Great job buddy. Really like your videos! Great point about the driver-assistance features

[@markstacy9708]

So glad you said the tailgate is damped, not dampened! Personal pet peeve of mine. Love your channel!

[@ryanfrancis7264]

I completely understand what you're talking about with the lane keep assist. My F-150 does it too and it drives me crazy. They need to give the user some option to calibrate it left or right in the lane a few inches.

[@davep4610]

Today I bought a V6 Ranger XLT FX4. Can't wait to take delivery in a couple days!

[@quazaar]

I have had my 22 Lightning for over 2 years. Until recently, I would shut off the lane keep. I hated the way it felt. My last long drive, i found out if i kept one hand on it to the side. It was just enough force to register and it would pretty much drive itself.

[@nickdeagle3271]

Thanks Steve good coffee break material. I like the truck but hard to squish us big guys in those mid size vehicles. My wife would prefer the smaller vehicles but I’m better suited to full size. I’ll check this out but not sure I’d go with 2.3 or 2.6.

[@J.W.W.]

Exactly

[@lucaswayneray]

You guys make great videos! Keep it up!

[@mickeybrumfield764]

The lane keep assist in my Subaru does the same thing you mentioned. It wants you to be wrestling with it, which is what it seems like. I just let it drive and give the steering wheel a little tug every few seconds.

[@seagullsbtn]

The smaller ecoboost with the Ford Performance tune will give you all that power. But I bet towing, I'd probably like the V6 better.

[@ccs9271]

Paying 54k for a midsized truck is insane

[@ALMX5DP]

Can save about $20k opting for a more basic 4wd model.

[@haroldbeauchamp3770]

@@ALMX5DPnot to mention waiting a couple years and the depreciation hits like a heavyweight boxer.

[@Agent.K.]

Yeah I was thinking 40k or 45k max. Which is still too much.

[@volvo09]

That's a Lariat (top trim, unless there is a platinum trim for the ranger). The manufacturers don't send reviewers base models. This is near 20k over base price.

[@Ichibuns]

Then don't buy it with all those options. Save $10k and still get the 2.7

[@TwoPair72]

I went to the build site and you can only get the 2.7 in 4WD. I chose the Lariat switched to 4wd and it added 6300 to the price tag. You might come out ahead with the 2WD 2.3 from it being lighter. If you're worried about power, have the dealer install the tune and you'll save 5 grand.

[@3352massic]

I love my new 2.7 litre Ranger. Definitely have to agree on that lane keeping assist as it is a pain.

[@TJ-oi5qe]

I really want this truck but the bed is too short for my needs.

[@gtrance3567]

Bed extender?

[@seanh2390]

impressive mileage IMO… thanks for the video

[@slmjake]

Wonder of a 40 60 rear seat is an option? That and a six foot bed would make me buy this tomorrow

[@kevindust2712]

The lack of a 60/40 split rear seat is inexcusable.

[@ryanfitzgerald7054]

The new Colorado is doing the same thing, so stupid

[@MikeR55]

Happy owner of a 22 Ranger XLT FX4 Supercab 4 door with a 6 ft bed. Not liking that Ford dropped the 6 ft bed in 24. I'm impressed with the power and gas mileage of the 2.3 turbo four.. (easy to maintain and no wet belt to fret about.) No surprise since it is a Mazda designed engine going back to 2005. Ford made some upgrades resulting in a very reliable, spirited engine. Not one issue and no recalls. Always a fun truck to drive. It cost $37K cdn in 22. I could never afford the current high prices. If you think you need the 2.7 V6, test drive the 2.3 four as well. You might decide it has more than enough power and you'll save over $2,000 on the purchase.

[@kevindust2712]

The $2250 2.7 option will be the best money you spend on a Ranger. You'll appreciate it every single time you are behind the wheel and you'll get it all back upon resale.

[@richman555]

The 2.3 was standard on the prior Ranger which proves it is a good engine. The 2.7 however is a great idea as there are alot of people still who want a v6. Also you can appreciate having both direct and port injection on the 2.7.

[@kevindust2712]

A small correction that the chrome is not standard with the Lariat trim level. The chrome package is a stand alone option, you can save some money and get a Lariat without the old man chrome.

[@wanted-33]

Thanks for the video sir. It's just the info I needed to help decide on which engine I would want. BTW, thanks for converting the numbers for us "metrically" challenged Americans.😁

[@TruckKing]

Glad I could help!

[@mikeburton8426]

There are a lot of options, some objectivity and a heck of a lot of subjectivity, but at the end of the day, one day back in June, I ordered a Lariat with 2.7. I like the look of the General Motors twins more but I’ve had 7 or 8 Fords and all but one were really reliable and long lasting,so I went with Ford, I find myself looking at it in the garage and thinking, this is what the new Tacoma could have looked like ( I have also owned a few Toyotas). I occasionally will haul lumber or a load of gravel but more often I will be going camping, kayaking, paddle boarding, mtn biking and when I come home I want to park in a garage. It ticked enough marks. Now I need to decide on what kind of fuel to burn. 87-91? There’s always a next decision.

[@paulm6481]

I recommend you have an eye exam at earliest convenience if you think Ranger is better looking than new Taco. 🤣🤦‍♂️

[@rightlanehog3151]

Stephen, How gosh darn long do we have to wait to see bumper or bed steps on every pickup? 🤔

[@twagn]

I Wish Ford would at least try to make the engine compartment good-looking instead of a convoluted bird nest

[@rjdavis7503]

Agreed, the engine compartment does look better with the 2.3. You can dress it up really well, too.

[@donchart1]

Like, who cares?... not like u stare at the engine all day...all they do is put a plastic cover on it thats a pain to remove when working on it.Not functional.

[@rjdavis7503]

@@donchart1 I do not use the plastic cover, Don. It is beneficial to see and recognize parts and function easier when the engine bay is clean.

[@brentworls8509]

Take the smaller cab, longer bed affordable option off the table flat out sucks. Yay for sticking it to the budget-minded buyer. Yay for hating on a 6 ft bed.

[@braamkotze473]

All that chrome is just wonderful for that old school truck vibe. I really dig it!

[@lawrenceison394]

V6 all the way!

[@ie6370]

Great review....I am happy with the gas mileage. I have a 24 Lariat arriving in 3 weeks, hot pepper red. I know it states it can take regular gas...but is there or what are the Advantages to using the Mid-grade and or the Premium gas rather than Regular

[@devilmonkey427]

Did it arrive yet?

[@nicholassmith7048]

15:01 I do prefer km/L over L/100km. As an end user, knowing how far I can go is more useful than how fuel efficient the vehicle is.

[@AI_CREATARD]

ABSOLUTELY

[@volvo09]

2:06 amazing that these days a Ranger needs a step to get into the bed. The classic rangers were so great because you could just reach in.

[@AdamRosenberg90]

Just a correction that this has the chrome appearance package, you can get a Lariat without all that horrible chrome 😅

[@UnderAchievrLP]

like the engine its a real sweet spot with pricing. Dont like the big screen(had it in an edge rental and it was hateful) the rear seat being a single piece vs 60/40. Wish nissan would wake up and make a turbo frontier from its 3.0L v6 outta the z and other nissans.

[@srrtbb]

I agree with turbo frontier! I been saying this and wish they build it as well! Nissan built some of the best turbo engines. Too bad they want to keep v6 n/a with "if it aight broke, don't fix it" attitude and people seems to love them. Ps. I don't love the refresh looks.

[@chrismarbrey9678]

It doesn't have chrome on it because it's the trim.It's because it's not the sport appearance package

[@0HOON0]

Best engine in the mid size segment. No cheap engine sounds. Mega towing power. Great economy. I would still get rid of it before the oil pump belt is due at 150k.

[@jeffk464]

It is replaceable.

[@wolfgang_h3t]

​@@jeffk464 He doesn't want to replace it, I think is the point

[@jeffk464]

@@wolfgang_h3t Its kind of part of owning a car/truck.

[@wolfgang_h3t]

@@jeffk464 Maybe if you're a Toyota guy or some shit lmao

[@shifter8207]

The chrome is an option you get a lariat with sport ( painted to match) or chrome

[@Zharsergey]

That bed is not standard for mid size trucks. It can fit a 4x8 sheet between the wheel wells.

[@Travide]

If they made a long bed version I'd have one 6 foot bed should be an option for sure

[@kristopherlauro4327]

You said 90 lb ft isn't a big jump over the base motor... Man. I kinda think it is.

[@mradamp125]

I have an F150 with the 3 L eco-boost it to more than the coyote and it flies

[@JDFIGHTER87]

My 3.2 Diesel uses 12 Liters/100 km here in Switzerland.

[@scottsmith1972]

I'd be interested in this rig would like to know if it could be flat towed

[@nicholassmith7048]

I agree about this halfway house we currently find ourselves with these semi-autonomous driving aids. Either drive for me, or let me drive. I don't want to have to supervise a computer and it's been proven that humans aren't designed to do that.

[@jeffk464]

I think the system that monitors your eyes is the best, 2nd best is the capacitive touch steering wheel, and third is having to jiggle the steering wheel every couple of minutes. You can go into settings and set it up so just adaptive cruise control comes on, no lane keep.

[@briancavanaugh7604]

@@jeffk464 "Monitors eyes" is volunteering and paying for active surveillance of your person, no thank you. Fthat.

[@KevinNiven]

I have the 2.7 in the Bronco I like the power and MPG

[@jeffk464]

The Bronco weighs more, less aero, and has bigger higher drag tires. So yes I would say you're better off with the 2.7. A super base Bronco is probably fine with the 2.3.

[@busslayer4790]

My current vehicle for hauling/towing is a 2012 Kia minivan. The best mpg it ever got for a tank was 22mpg. I am impressed that a modern mid-size truck does better. Even if TK's test was a fluke, I imagine at worse they are comparable. I have heard a lot of people say they get great economy with the 2.7 in F150s too.

[@9002-bv9xz]

sunroof not available on Ranger?

[@BroItsTJ]

This is the truck I would buy. That engine is perfect for that truck. I wouldn’t get the lariat tho. XLT better price

[@kevindust2712]

The XLT has Tupperware door handles, a terrible digital dash and cheap plastic door cards. The Lariat is well worth the cost difference.

[@tag_76]

This seems like a really good truck, but considering the price, performance, MPG, and overall specs, it makes me even happier that I went with a Silverado.

[@kevinarndt2011]

I drive a 2019 Jeep and the message to put hand on the wheel is annoying, it seems to only register if hands are on the top half of the wheel and if you have a hand on the bottom half it doesn't detect that

[@daveweir6407]

To my knowledge, the Ranger Lariat does not come with the "A" drive mode like my F150. I really like the size, but this would be a deal breaker for me.

[@BeanoNoir]

Two things, driver AIDS is how they should be referred to, as they slowly eat away at your own defensive driving skills. Secondly, doing the double click on fuel up regularly runs the risk of fuel making it past your vent valve and filling up your EVAP cannister early. Saw cannisters full of fuel all the time. They will eventually fill up regardless from the vapors, but you will definitely speed it along filling up the filler neck.

[@jmrdrgz]

Thanks for converting for us Yankees.

[@ms1406]

I kinda like this truck with the v6

[@percivalgooglyeyes6178]

Does anyone know if this is the iron graphite block 2.7 they use in the F-150? On Ford's Ranger website they don't seem to be bragging about it, so I assume it is not. Just aluminum maybe?

[@devilmonkey427]

It is iron graphite.

[@LT-xo3dj]

What is driving the oil pump ? Is it a belt or a timing chain .

[@0HOON0]

Rubber belt.

[@MrRockyko]

It’s Kevlar belt military grade Kevlar it will last

[@jeffk464]

@@MrRockyko military grade means lowest bidder.

[@MrRockyko]

@@jeffk464 o it don’t we used Kevlar in Iraq and Afghanistan

[@jeffk464]

@@MrRockyko its an old joke

[@jamesm568]

Even if the V6 was not a turbo the V6 is still better overall when it comes to longevity and overall performance.

[@richb1784]

It's nice but honestly the 2.3 is enough for me.

[@ALMX5DP]

I tend to agree. Lots of people have positive things to say about the prior generation that just came with the 2.3. Seemed to tow well, and got decent fuel economy for the daily commute. I don’t blame people for wanting more of a hotrod like this 2.7 might be, but for me this truck is fine as I have other toys when I want to be a speed racer.

[@MrTonaluv]

This 2.7l just got 27mpg in a real world test. I'd say it's giving best of both worlds results here. Great power AND economy.

[@ALMX5DP]

@@MrTonaluvthe 2.7 is great don’t get me wrong, just saying that the $2k+ premium isn’t necessarily worth it for me. Would probably take 10 years to recoup that difference with the potentially better fuel economy. Of course it’s still a hotrod so there’s that too just for me I’m more of a base model truck type person (it’s a tool for a job and not much more).

[@pathunter7003]

@@ALMX5DP you don’t usually get a bigger engine for better fuel economy, it’s always the opposite

[@Ichibuns]

@@MrTonaluv The oil pump on the 2.7 is a wet belt, though. That will likely cause a major repair later. That engine would need to come out. For longevity, the 2.3 definitely wins. It was a bad move on Fords part to switch the 2.7 oil pump to a wet belt drive.

[@GrumpaMike]

My exact truck. 10.2 litres per 100km is my average.

[@maxr4448]

Under hood of new vehicles is a HORROR story straight from Halloween! Jeepers Creepers

[@rjdavis7503]

Would like to see the 2.7 in the Mustang.

[@the600cc]

63k. I’m good ! Damn!!!!!

[@liamrobinson2084]

Too expensive by about $15k, what is the point of the tiny bed? It looks nice, is probably pretty good at all the car stuff, but what is the price comparison vs F-150 with the same engine? Is there a compelling reason to get this rather than the half-ton? Cheers gents.

[@kevindust2712]

Compelling reasons to get this instead of an F150: it fits in more garages, it's easier to park, it's capable enough for most buyers, it's more fun to drive, it's 20% less expensive than a comparably equipped F150.

[@GenkiDamaSSJ]

Sucks that you can't get 4 Auto unless you get the Raptor unless you live in like Australia

[@josephharvey5742]

Really good MPG for this size truck. I'm waiting until Ford adds a few more options before they get me in the showroom. I'd like HUD, ventilated seats and rear ventilation. I'm not a moonroof fan and have had it on the last three vehicles and rarely use it so it's not a concern for me that it's not on this truck.

[@alyxander8897]

Bring back the cheap 4x4 or 4x2 single cab with a stick please.

[@freed14760]

Hello again from Olean Ny 14760!! I was looking forward to this review! V6 turbo in a Ranger? Under $60,000? Hell ya! Hope you and your family are in great health! Did you see your 1st KZbin employer has new KZbinrs on their channel? They were doing voice overs for awhile..

[@valensinclair6750]

For a few thousand more (in USD) you can get a Ranger Raptor. Lariats are either overpriced, or RRaptors are underpriced. I'm not sure which.

[@honda116969]

It's worth 43K... Not a dollar more IMO 🤷 That's being generous

[@miamiSincar]

the 2.7 have the oil pump rubber belt inside the engine

[@Ryan-cf6lc]

That delay with the gas pedal is awfully disappointing.

[@bigsmith7349]

2.7 has a wet belt for the oil pump that if it breaks its a engine out job ..i would stay away and go with a 4 banger

[@Allegronaut]

My interest ceased after you mentioned the price! FORD, found on road dead, priced into oblivion!

[@LifeWideOpen780]

64k for a ranger lol

[@MrTonaluv]

You can get a lower spec one if you want. No-one is holding a gun to your head forcing you to buy a Lariat.

[@opadilla123]

Go get a compact cheap truck because these aint getting any cheaper

[@jeffk464]

Isn't that R Raptor pricing?

[@MikeR55]

@@jeffk464 R Raptor is $80K plus in Canada. Base XL Ranger is about $42 cdn

[@rondail5675]

I never owned a Ford but I like the Ranger. It would have to be a Ranger Raptor with a extended warranty.

[@yyfreak1637]

I had a 2012 ford Taurus with the 3.5 N.A. v6. I loved it, dumbest thing I ever did was get rid of it. I have a Nissan frontier now (new ranger wasn’t out yet) but if I had to choose again I would seriously consider the ranger it looks really solid.

[@darrellgochanour5546]

Are they plastic rims or aluminum?

[@patricktrier4503]

Agree 100% about the lame keep assist. I like it but wish it would recognize that my hands are on the wheel!

[@МихаилЩербаков-й9щ]

Бутылку с водой вставляют в руль😊

[@nlken7175]

Boy is this an Ol Man spec truck with the chrome and make's the Truck look so out dated. The L/100 was very good.

[@daleburton3591]

Who cares about the fuel consumption when you can get a v6? These i4 engines are working too hard lugging around the mass of these trucks. Oh, my 2023 Ridgeline regularly gets 7.4litres/100-km on a run, with v6 power and longevity.

[@Cringer101]

your ridgeline with 7inches of ground clearance will get hungup going anywhere other than a grocery store carpark

[@paulm6481]

Strange transmission shift lever. Why does Ford offer different shift levers in Ranger and Bronco and F150 and Mustang and Expedition and …. They should just use the transmission shift lever from Bronco in everything and call it a day and save money not designing and manufacturing different levers. Chevy is doing it right as is Toyota.

[@marksman4004]

That 2.7 looks like a nightmare under the hood.

[@devilmonkey427]

Every motor looks like a nightmare under the hood now a days.

[@jaykanngiesser3454]

There are reports of premature engine failures on the 2.7 as well. Sigh…… What is it with all manufacturers making Tofu engines these days?

[@pathunter7003]

Yea you can read all kinds of things on the web

[@Jay-me7gw]

Are you referring to the recall that was only for a 6 month production window in 2021 due to faulty valves supplied to Ford?

[@pathunter7003]

@@Jay-me7gw the dude doesn’t know what is going on, he only could make it to the end of the sentence..

[@blueheelerfriend8450]

87gas is the lowest not the best. If you want the real power and torque you need to use 93 gas.

[@craigg4246]

I’m more worried about the miles per rubber oil pump drive belt than miles per gallon.

[@christopherkeene3647]

Why are they putting turbos on everything….oh wait, raising the prices 🎉

[@johnoberle9750]

The height of this truck is as high as a Super Duty. Good thing they put steps in the bed sides. Ridiculous! I love the original Ranger. This truck is something totally different. Not my choice.

[@fogit4668]

One thing with the 2.3L is that the cams are driven by belts that run in oil. Bad idea. 2.7L uses cam chains that run in oil. Good idea.

[@DH-hp7nv]

I like the ranger until one opens the door and the interior becomes visible. The interior is trash….it has that cheap suv look and feel. 2.7 in the f150 seems like a better buy.

[@Fastapproaching]

Who uses kilometers and liters in the US to calculate fuel mileage, you pay for gas in gallon so what is the mpg

[@PedroPerez-sb6qb]

Like the midsize truck but not the full size price. This is getting out of control.

[@jrhunt414]

I’ll stick to my $1k 03 Ranger. 3.0V6 same mpg on 31” mud terrains. 6’ bed. That looks like an absolute waste of money and no better than my truck except acceleration, towing, and back seat space. My truck costs less than the yearly taxes on that one.

[@benhaze1010]

You did not answer the question in the title of your review. So what is your opinion? For me it is the V6 but you were quite general and evasive in your conclusion. Not your usual self!

[@МихаилЩербаков-й9щ]

Вставьте в руль бутылку с водой 😊 Он будет думать что руки на руле

[@zzremington]

I’d consider one, but no sunroof is a deal breaker for me.