Is the Original Quran Preserved - Dr Joseph Lumbard

[@brazzaferochannel6802]

We have sent down the Message; And We will assuredly Guard it (from corruption). (Al Qur'an, 15:9)

[@mohamedab9033]

@Brave Soul Allah never promised to preserve the Torah and Gospel, those were localized scriptures sent exclusively to the Israelites. Plus Prophets were continuously coming to them as well and their very texts were telling them of the future coming Final Prophet (This is why the Jewish cream of Rabbis emigrated to Arabia, to Madinah exactly. To wait for him). Yet, ofc, they kept twisting the texts and killing those prophets untill The favor of God was lifted from them as well as Prophetood forever. The Quran is the final testament sent to all of mankind as it makes the claim for itself, and Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him was the seal of prophethood on earth. There won't be any updates coming. Therefore a condition of heavenly preservation of the text was inevitable and logical.

[@abdelben2252]

What objectivity and honesty looks and sounds like 👍.

[@eldiscipuloandalusi]

This information confirms that the Qur'an has been preserved by God Almighty Himself

[@anwarabrahams2413]

Ameen

[@eldiscipuloandalusi]

@Brave Soul Show me a verse in the bible where God guarantees the protection of the book. Something similar to this verse: {Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur’an and indeed, We will be its guardian.} (Al-Hijr 15:9)

[@akbar339]

@Brave Soul Allah never did promised to that He will preserve Torah, Zabur and Injeel, like He did on Quran.

[@akbar339]

@@premansatheesan3163 They can claim anything the fact that they are not the one who received revelation from the prophet to verify what are missing and whats not. It their opinion only.

[@RAAYSofLIGHT]

@@premansatheesan3163 The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History is a 1978 book by Michael H. Hart, an astrophysicist, alien life researcher and white separatist.[3][4][5] It was the first book of Hart, which was reprinted in 1992 with revisions. It is a ranking of the 100 people who, according to Hart, most influenced human history.[4][6] The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History Covor of book (The 100 A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History).jpg The cover of the 1992 edition. Author Michael H. Hart Country United States Language English Series 1st edition (1978) 2nd edition (1992) Subject Ranking, Biography, History Published 1978 (Hart Publishing company, New York)[1][2] Media type Print ISBN 9780806513508 OCLC 644066940 Hart wrote another book in 1999, entitled A View from the Year 3000,[7] voiced in the perspective of a person from that future year and ranking the most influential people in history. Roughly half of those entries are fictional people from 2000-3000, but the remainder are actual people. These were taken mostly from the 1992 edition, with some re-ranking of order.[8][9] Summary The first person on Hart's list is the prophet of Islam, Muhammad,[10][11][12][13] a selection that generated some controversy.[14] Hart asserted that Muhammad was "supremely successful" in both the religious and secular realms. He also believed that Muhammad's role in the development of Islam was far more influential than Jesus' collaboration in the development of Christianity.[15][16][17] He attributes the development of Christianity to St. Paul, who played a pivotal role in its dissemination.

[@quraischmovement]

Salaam Dr. Lumbard. It was a nice interview. I appreciate your polite way of talking. May GOD always bless you for your good work.

[@augywilangkara6649]

Thank you for a clear explanation based on scientific evidence. I am hoping that more and more people look into this type of study and buy in the concept of Al-Qur’an as the source code for humanity.

[@mgggggggggggggggg]

Thanks Joseph for this nice video, always great to see you, blessings JazakAllah

[@優さん-n7m]

The skeptics (mainly Atheists and certain Christian groups) that are obssessed with Qur'an will goto any extent to reject any evidence that Muslims may present regarding the preservation of the Qur'an.

[@subzero3056]

They are many

[@HassanalBolkiahSoyjak]

No serious historian even considers the Quran to be modified, at best they state that the message if preserved there, and recent stats say that the Quran is very close to perfectly preserved and are accurate to 96.1%

[@neluroman555]

@@HassanalBolkiahSoyjak no serious historian has ever said that the Quran is ethernal, unchanged from the time of Muhammad, or divine.

[@justchillin3492]

​@@neluroman555eternal and divine is something a naturalist would never say. Qur'an being from divine origin is something you're either convinced with or you deny, and yes the Qur'an is indeed from the time of the prophet as the Birmingham parchments have proven.

[@franceslumbard1417]

Very illuminating,

[@danielharrison1065]

A beautiful lesson for Islamophobes ❤️

[@danielharrison1065]

@Brave SoulJesus said "By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me.". John 5 30 The message of Torah, Psalms, Gospel and Holy Quran- Hear oh Israel ! Your lord, God is only one Lord and All prophets from First Man Adam to Prophet Muhammad brought same message of worshipping one true god who is Eternal and merciful.

[@danielharrison1065]

@@premansatheesan3163 It's a Recitation not translation 👍

[@Flyingdutchie]

Yet another debunk for "haters" ELHAMDOULILLAH

[@Flyingdutchie]

@Brave Soul There is no need for cynisism/ pulling a "victim" card. The Last Holy Book is still a invitation for Humanity

[@Flyingdutchie]

This is how a desperate "missionairy" attempt look like🤦🏻😂...same old tricks/twisted tongues Ve La Galibe IllAllah

[@Flyingdutchie]

@Brave Soul 😂😂😂 Look how weak your game is🤦🏻

[@alexandra_spitsina]

Respected author, thank you so much for the video! I would like to learn more about it. Could you please provide or tell the names of sources where I might find these researches and studies? بارك الله فيك

[@jelumbard]

Behnam Sadeghi and Uwe Bergmann., ““The Codex of a Companion of the Prophet and the Qurʾān of the Prophet.” Arabica 57 (2010): 343-436.
 Behnam Sadeghi and Mohsen Goudarzi, “Ṣanʿāʾ 1 and the origins of the Qurʾān”, Der Islam 87 (2012), 1-129. Nicolai Sinai, 2014 “When did the consonantal skeleton of the Quran reach closure? Part I”, BSOAS 77/2 (2014), 273-92. Nicolai Sinai, “When did the consonantal skeleton of the Quran reach closure? Part II”, BSOAS 77/3 (2014). 509-21. Michael Cook, “The stemma of the regional codices of the Koran”, in G.K. Lividas (ed.), Graeco-Arabica 9-10: Festschrift in Honour of V. Christides. Athens: Institute for Graeco-Oriental and African Studies, 2004, 89-104. Marijn van Putten, “‘The Grace of God’ as evidence for a written Uthmanic archetype: the importance of shared orthographic idiosyncrasies,” Bulletin of SOAS, 82, 2 (2019), 271-288. Hythem Sidky, “On the Regionality of Qurʾānic Codices,” JIQSA 5 (2020), 133-210. - Harald Motzki, 2001. “The collection of the Qurʾān: a reconsideration of Western views in light of recent methodological developments”, Der Islam 78, (2001) 1-34. - Yasin Dutton, “An early Muṣḥaf according to the reading of Ibn ʿĀmir”, Journal of Qur’anic Studies 3/1 (2001), 71-89. - Yasin Dutton, “Some notes on the British Library’s ‘oldest Qurʾan manuscript’ (Or. 2165)”, Journal of Qur’anic Studies 6/1 (2004), 43-71. - Francois Déroche. Les manuscrits du coran: Aux origines de la calligraphie coranique. Paris: Bibliothèque nationale 1983. - François Déroche. The Abbasid Tradition: Qurʾans of the 8th to the 10th centuries AD. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. - François Déroche, La transmission écrite du Coran dans les débuts de l’islam: Le codex Parisino-petropolitanus. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009. - François Déroche, Qurʾans of the Umayyads: A First Overview. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2014.

[@alexandra_spitsina]

@@jelumbard Thank you!!!

[@RAAYSofLIGHT]

Masha’a Allah ! ماشاء الله [Al-Hijr:9]: إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا الذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ لَحَافِظُونَ Behold, it is We Ourselves who have bestowed from on high, step by step, this reminder? and, behold, it is We who shall truly guard it [from all corruption].

[@RAAYSofLIGHT]

@@premansatheesan3163 Simply because he didn’t witness 33 crore Muppathi mukkodi.. devils including kali

[@RAAYSofLIGHT]

@@premansatheesan3163 And it wasn’t happens like vishwamithran was shivering by seeing the dance of me Menaka as in your epics.

[@RAAYSofLIGHT]

@@premansatheesan3163 Mind your business.. and just leave Here we are sharing very pure argumentative thoughts. This is not the right place for you to comment ( simply you are not even purified to comment here -please move on )

[@RAAYSofLIGHT]

@@premansatheesan3163 The Glorious Qur’an, the Muslims’ religious Scripture, was revealed in Arabic to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) through the Angel Gabriel (peace be upon him). The revelation occurred piecemeal, over a period of 23 years, sometimes in brief verses and sometimes in longer chapters.[1] The Qur’an (lit. a ‘reading’ or ‘recitation’) is distinct from the recorded sayings and deeds (Sunnah) of the Prophet (peace be upon him), which are instead preserved in a separate set of literature collectively called the Ahadith (lit. ‘news,’ ‘report,’ or ‘narration’). Upon receiving revelation, the Prophet (peace be upon him) engaged himself in the duty of conveying the message to his Companions (may Allah bless them all) through reciting the exact words he heard in their exact order. This is evident in his inclusion of even the words of God which were directed specifically to him, for example: “Qul” (“Say [to the people, O Muhammad]”). The Qur’an’s rhythmic style and eloquent expression make it easy to memorize. Indeed, God describes this as one of its essential qualities for preservation and remembrance (Qur’an, 44:58; 54:17, 22, 32, 40), particularly in an Arab society, which prided itself on orations of lengthy pieces of poetry. Michael Zwettler notes that: “In ancient times, when writing was scarcely used, memory and oral transmission was exercised and strengthened to a degree now almost unknown.”[2] Large portions of the revelation were thus easily memorized by a large number of people in the community of the Prophet (peace be upon him). The Prophet (peace be upon him) encouraged his Companions to learn each verse that was revealed and transmit it to others.[3] The Qur’an was also required to be recited regularly as an act of worship, especially during the daily meditative prayers (salah). Through these means, many repeatedly heard passages from the revelation recited to them, memorized them and used them in prayer. The entire Qur’an was memorized verbatim (word for word) by some of the Prophet’s Companions. Among them were Zaid ibn Thabit, Ubayy ibn Kaab, Muadh ibn Jabal, and Abu Zaid.[4] Not only were the words of the Qur’an memorized, but also their pronunciation, which later formed into a science called Tajweed. This science meticulously elucidates how each letter is to be pronounced, as well as the word as a whole, both in context of other letters and words. Today, we can find people of all different languages able to recite the Qur’an as if they are Arabs themselves, living during the time of the Prophet (peace be upon him). Furthermore, the sequence or order of the Qur’an was arranged by the Prophet (peace be upon him) himself and was also well-known to the Companions.[5] Each Ramadan, the Prophet (peace be upon him) would repeat after the angel Gabriel (reciting) the entire Qur’an in its exact order as far as it had been revealed, while in the presence of a number of his Companions.[6] In the year of his death, he recited it twice.[7] Thereby, the order of verses in each chapter and the order of the chapters became reinforced in the memories of each of the Companions present. As the Companions spread out to various provinces with different populations, they took their recitations with them in order to instruct others.[8] In this way, the same Qur’an became widely retained in the memories of many people across vast and diverse areas of land. Indeed, memorization of the Qur’an emerged into a continuous tradition across the centuries, with centers/schools for memorization being established across the Muslim world.[9] In these schools, students learn and memorize the Qur’an along with its tajweed, at the feet of a master who in turn acquired the knowledge from his teacher, an ‘un-broken chain’ going all the way back to the Prophet of God. The process usually takes 3-6 years. After mastery is achieved and the recitation checked for lack of errors, a person is granted a formal license (ijaza) certifying he has mastered the rules of recitation and can now recite the Qur’an the way it was recited by Muhammad, the Prophet of God (peace be upo him). A.T. Welch, a non-Muslim orientalist, writes: “For Muslims, the Qur’an is much more than scripture or sacred literature in the usual Western sense. Its primary significance for the vast majority through the centuries has been in its oral form, the form in which it first appeared, as the “recitation” chanted by Muhammad to his followers over a period of about 20 years… The revelations were memorized by some of Muhammad’s followers during his lifetime, and the oral tradition that was thus established has had a continuous history ever since, in some ways independent of, and superior to, the written Qur’an... Through the centuries the oral tradition of the entire Qur’an has been maintained by the professional reciters (qurraa). Until recently, the significance of the recited Qur’an has seldom been fully appreciated in the West.”[10] The Qur’an is perhaps the only book, religious or secular, that has been memorized completely by millions of people.[11] Leading orientalist, Kenneth Cragg, reflects that: “…this phenomenon of Qur’anic recital means that the text has traversed the centuries in an unbroken living sequence of devotion. It cannot, therefore, be handled as an antiquarian thing, nor as a historical document out of a distant past. The fact of hifdh (Qur’anic memorization) has made the Qur’an a present possession through all the lapse of Muslim time and given it a human currency in every generation, never allowing its relegation to a bare authority for reference alone.”[12] 1. Muhammad Hamidullah, Introduction to Islam, London: MWH Publishers, 1979, p.17. 2. Michael Zwettler, The Oral Tradition of Classical Arabic Poetry, Ohio State Press, 1978, p.14. 3. Saheeh Al-Bukhari Vol.6, Hadith No.546. 4. Saheeh Al-Bukhari Vol.6, Hadith No.525. 5. Ahmad von Denffer, Ulum Al-Qur’an, The Islamic Foundation, UK, 1983, p.41-42; Arthur Jeffery, Materials for the History of the Text of the Qur’an, Leiden: Brill, 1937, p.31. 6. Saheeh Al-Bukhari Vol.6, Hadith No.519. 7. Saheeh Al-Bukhari Vol.6, Hadith Nos.518 & 520. 8. Ibn Hisham, Seerah Al-Nabi, Cairo, n.d., Vol.1, p.199. 9. Labib as-Said, The Recited Qur’an, translated by Morroe Berger, A. Rauf, and Bernard Weiss, Princeton: The Darwin Press, 1975, p.59. 10. The Encyclopedia of Islam, ‘The Qur’an in Muslim Life and Thought.’ 11. William Graham, Beyond the Written Word, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993, p.80. 12. Kenneth Cragg, The Mind of the Qur’an, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1973, p.26.

[@RAAYSofLIGHT]

@@premansatheesan3163 I told you earlier to move on .. you are in a fake ID as and you don’t know what you are talking about .. what’s your point? Where did you got this claim from ?? Is there any authenticity for you claim ??

[@zaheerahmed780]

Beautifully described..

[@linas7266]

Salam Dr. Lumbard, thank you so much for the words of truth that you say. We are humbled by the honesty of the muslims of that time. Inshaa Allah we be, all of us, like them.

[@neluroman555]

He lied a lot. , and it is not for first time when does that. Unfortunately to say something of substance about Islam it is need to lie, and that is exactly what this Joseph Lombard does.

[@neluroman555]

@Moneyxl00 he said that the sayings of Muslims regarding the fact that the Quran was compiled into book during the time of Muhammad or shortly after that and that the Quran has not changed from that period are true. No, that is a lie, and he knows very well that. There are no Quran manuscripts from that period, that is why the modern Quran is a compilation of a recitation, Hafs recitation, and has at base no any manuscript. Why is that if there are reliable Quran manuscripts ? Why? What about Sanna Manuscripts, here it is again a lie when he shamelessly asserts that no one has ever studied them . Big, big lie! The Sanaa Manuscripts have been studied by many historians, the most famous of whom is the German Dr. Puin. Dr. Puin has said that the Sanna Manuscripts prove beyond any doubt that the Quran has suffered many, many human interventions. This Dr. Joseph Lumbard lies and lies, and it is not for first time when he does this. . I cannot figure out how this man can look into the camera and then lie like this. How? How?

[@ETEDOthman]

Thanks for this information 💚

[@samsungkartit]

Thanks Dr

[@jelumbard]

Welcome

[@yowhaatsup]

Dope video do you have social media

[@fs5297]

If you can really read the Quran even those variants are like some words pronounced differently, they are written in same way in most cases just pronounced differently. N even these are attested by the Sahih Hadees. Quran was memorized by thousands at the time of Prophet SAW, n even after that.... You can see it even today, I have seen many little kids who have memorized the whole Quran, even I have seen little kid reading Quran in other Qira'ah... Isn't it just surprising!? SubhanALLAH

[@fs5297]

@Brave Soul those Prophets were only sent to Children of Israel, moreover, those books weren't meant to follow till day of Judgement, Every Prophet (there is a difference between Rasool n Nabi) so every rasool came with new rules n regulations too, confirming what was in previous book n forming new rules, Muhammad SAW was the last Prophet,so QURAN itself says, it confirms what was true in old books, n tells you new rules n regulations, some of them are even consistent with old books n meant to be followed till end of time, therefore it's preservation is necessary... 😊😊😊 N I wonder if you know or not, but We believe in bible n torah as far as it goes consistent with QURAN, n we believe in what doesn't contradicts with what is described in Quran, we reject what is totally against the teachings of Quran, n for what isn't described in Quran n present in old scriptures, we neither deny it nor accept it, here we are told to say "Allah knows best"...

[@fs5297]

@@premansatheesan3163 I don't understand this language

[@fs5297]

@@premansatheesan3163 you know I know all that stuff.... This is now over repeated, musfhaf not having dots or a'araab doesn't means when you put them they now become something different, that's just for making it easy to read for non Arabs, n all that Actually allowed the different pronunciations of same words, n that's all there in authentic hadees, n please write shortly, I cant read that much

[@fs5297]

@@premansatheesan3163 Uthman (R.A) did that to remove the mistakes made by people themselves.... Aply your mind too bro, if you are muslim, n then you are denying hadees n Quran itself, what's that behaviour

[@fs5297]

@@premansatheesan3163 no bro foe arabs those words were easily read n recognised, coz they used to read that way, n what those arabs were mostly illiterate, they mostly passed on n learnt Quran in verbal way not by writing... It's like saying if you remove the a'arab an arab isn't able to read then... But they can read it the way the Prophet SAW read... They weren't people of literature, they learnt by listening n conveyed it mostly by reciting it verbaly to others... N it's ijmaa of Ummah that everything we know of QURAN is conveyed from generation to generation, n attested vigorously, soo now you will say the whole Ummah went astray, despite of hadees that says: My Ummah will not gether on falsehood... So you now deny it...

[@letsdothis5131]

Brilliant.

[@letsdothis5131]

@@premansatheesan3163 Good for you and your teacher.

[@georgianageorgiana5879]

Excellent discourse

[@mustaphafikri45]

Call me biased, but I agree with what this man says.

[@mustaphafikri45]

@@premansatheesan3163 Oh my God!!! We didn't know all that! Where did you get that? Now I have doubts.... No wait a sec... ACTUALLY WE DO, WE ALWAYS DID !! Look my friend, you only got these informations from OUR sources WE told you all this!, we translated them so everyone can have access to them, you think you somehow came to a new discovery? Don't make us laugh! By the way, you're wrong about the earliest Quran being from the 8th century. If you know how carbon dating works then no need to explain. You know what's funny? All those who reported the information you're trying ro use against us all agree on the preservation of the Quran. We keep telling you that we Muslims have abrogation in the Quran (Allah Himself says he abregates what he wants in the Quran), and then you come and say "hey guys, did you guys know that some verses are missing?) *facepalming* One more thing: since when do you think Muslims rely on manuscripts? Quran recitation, and memorization are a living tradition. It's not like the Quran was lost at some point and suddenly we came to find about it through manuscripts! Don't compare it to the bible plz! And just because you find a manuscript doesn't mean you should take it as an authentic source of information! Especially when you don't know who wrote it. Lastly. If all the manuscripts of the Quran were all full of mistakes ,or were all lost, we would still have the authentic Quran today because we actually have it in our memories and hearts, transmitted by trustworthy hafizs through different chains going all the way back to the source, we even have kids memorizing it along with the books of hadith!!!!!!! Try not to use these "copy-paste" arguments again my friend.

[@mustaphafikri45]

@@premansatheesan3163 First of all, sorry if I sounded harsh at the beginning, it's just that we Muslims get tired of hearing the same misconceptions over and over, I'm sure you can understand where we're coming from. As for Mohammed PBUH coming down from the mountain scared and shivering... well, Moses PBUH was frightened too when he had the revelation! I mean, what else would you expect of someone who just saw an angel in real life? let alone if he saw the same angel again in its true form, in which he is so huge that it covered the horizons?! It only goes to show that Mohammed truly experienced and felt what he said! If you ask me, that's actually the most natural and believable way anyone would act if they experienced that! so .... What's your point?

[@mustaphafikri45]

@@premansatheesan3163 Before I answer, what do you believe? are you an atheist? a Christian? what?? And most importantly... How old are you? Just so I know who I'm talking to, and whether it's even worth it. Because honestly, you brought nothing! So, what are you?

[@mustaphafikri45]

@@premansatheesan3163 OOOOH PLZ!!!! Cut the act and tell us what you believe! this " I am an ordinary human being" is a cowardly attempt to hide what you believe in. What's the matter? Are you afraid we're gonna intellectually destroy and shatter your belief into million pieces? Have some guts and tell us... Learn courage from us, We are MUSLIMS and we're proud of it. So what are you?????????

[@mustaphafikri45]

​@@premansatheesan3163 And by the way... What the hell are all these fallacies you're spitting?? Makes me think you actually are insecure about your own belief and try to justify it through attacking other people's belief. Prove me wrong. What are you?

[@banihafiz]

At 1:01 who said it?

[@fms-international]

Interesting insights. I have started to follow your videos but wanted to ask your opinion on viewing the Quran solely from a linguistic perspective i.e. interpreting it's language without considering the Tafsir/history etc... I came across another individual who has translated the Quran solely from a linguistic angle and via a pan-textual analysis of the language within the Quran - Sam Gerrans. I wanted to get your opinion on this.

[@abdullahm6932]

Alhamdulillah

[@lobnamagdy1514]

Can anyone tell how scholars determine the age of manuscript especially that I heard that the carbon dating technique only determines the time of the death of the animal used not the time of writing is that true information or not?

[@lobnamagdy1514]

We Muslims don’t depend on manuscripts we depend on the people who memorize Quran there were dozens of people who memorized Quran by the death of the prophet peace be upon him Secondly from where do you get your information ? Thirdly even if you are talking honestly, I’m sure you are not, So our book is better than yours which some versions have more whole chapters

[@Restlessab]

Bismillah Arrahman Arrahim "We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly guard it (from corruption)." surah Al-hijr - chapter9 verse15 "And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a Surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah , if you should be truthful." al_baqara chapter 2 verse 23

[@Restlessab]

@@premansatheesan3163 the man in the video is not even a muslim yet answered your question

[@Restlessab]

@@premansatheesan3163 division of sunnis and shiites has got nothing to do with it, what im telling you is that no verse of the coran was lost, it is all there and hasnt been modified.if you are asking about how the surahs were arreanged let me tell you this as an example the last verse to ever be revealed to the prophet is not at the end of the book. As a whole, the book is preserved and unmodified since the start where muslims were few

[@Restlessab]

@@premansatheesan3163 why are you changing the subject?

[@Restlessab]

@@premansatheesan3163 everytime you feel triggered you bring how prophet muhammad knew about the scriptures or married kids or now according to you was exploited sexually.... Did you listen to yourself?

[@Restlessab]

@@premansatheesan3163 islamic tradition? Show me where in islamic tradition it says that prophet muhammad rode with a caravan and was assaulted sexually lol plz get informed, take a break of youtube and come back......if only u know what you are missing out on, let your pride go for a while and read about what the prophet really did during his lifetime.....

[@dxsaqibdy]

Mashallah

[@truthseeker3920]

Allhamdulilah

[@bluesky_5]

Dr. Daniel Brubaker has a KZbin Channel and says there is a Variant Corán and It was not reliably preserved, What do you think about that?what about that?, what do you say about that? Please someone who knows answer me? Thank you.

[@rachidibnrochd8313]

You say so cause you don't know Arabic and you don't know science of "qiraat". Muslims have the original text in the original language and they transmit it generation to generation orally and by scriptures. They continu so until nowadays. Millions know Quran by heart. It was and it's still like that from prophet mohamed times peace be upon him and upon All Allah's prophets. Thank u.

[@rachidibnrochd8313]

@Brave Soul Educate yourself. Before telling ignorance. Open ur eyes, look around u, peoples everywhere, millions accept islam, continuly. God guides u to truth. Good luck.

[@Ttcopp12rt]

Dan Brubakers book is eyeopening...So much so that Islamic Awareness affirmed there is no first complete Quranic manuscript. They submitted to Dan Brubakers textual analysis and have put on there website that there are 63 fragments from many years apart that in which they guesstimate. But academia is now dogmatic - there is no 1st century complete Quran manuscript and Daniel Brubakers scholarship has put forth a provoking challenge to what we thought we knew about the Quran.

[@rachidibnrochd8313]

@Brave Soul U ve a serious problem in ur faith dude. Ur respect for GOD, cause Allah is THE GOD, shows u r so far from him. God gives the old and the new testaments o the responsibility of the Jewish people, they corrupted it, it's a scientific fact. The last testament preservation it's ALLAH JOB. So the Quran is preseved. U r blindness will take u to perdition. Dude.

[@rachidibnrochd8313]

@Brave Soul Hhhhhhhhhhhh Blindness is perdition's mother

[@Mustaza5]

ok....then who wrote the bible?

[@mahmoudsbeih8614]

My dear brothers, all the prophets used to say to their people, O my people. With the exception of Christ, he used to say, "Children of Israel." Because he does not have a father of them.

[@jakelister6386]

Muslims have one Quran And if you can one country or group that have another Quran today and claim it to be right then please speak up And produce your evidence There is one Quran and Muslims world wide all agree on it This what you all can't see This is what you can't understand about Quran Put the book down and show us where one surah is recited different, pick any surah and show us where the aribic is recites different this how you can finally put end to this My 12 sister knows the whole Quran off by heart And she is not an Arab,

[@ultrasignificantfootnote3378]

Where is the oldest complete Quran ?

[@ZulkefliJamil]

Jos Noorhoff .. Turkey.. Tokapi Museum

[@bacinthezahab3289]

In Egypt we have in the central library of islamic manuscripts a copy of the Quraan ; experts say that it dates to the end of the first century of hegra and is probably was copied directly from the othmanic Quraan (first Quraan -there were a certain number of copies distributed among the major cities " in iraq ,syria , egypt and others" of the islamic world at that time and to be replicated and further distributed around the same country but unfortunatly no one can be shure where are the copies of the othmanic Quraan . Lately in Bermingham england parts of an unknown manuscript was found and they say it is contemporary to the prophet or right after his death " peace be upon him" and they are still studying it.

[@bacinthezahab3289]

But to muslims The Quraan was an oral revelations in the first place so it was memorized by the arabs and they were kings of the spoken word , ( befor Islam many of them were very good with poems and they were used to memorize hundreds of poems and the best and longest poems were called the " Alfiah " because it is composed of a thounsand verse they would hang it on the walls of Kabaa in Mecca and that was a great honnor . And up untill now many families in the muslim world have a member or more who memorize the Quraan so we do not need very much the first copy of Quraan except for historic matters because it was already handed down generation to generation orally and it didnt change for 1400years and God is the protector.

[@bacinthezahab3289]

@Mursaleen Bulus I am not a scolar but what i ve been taught and what i ve read later is that in the time of khalifa Abu Bakr "first khalifa after the prophet" some of the memorizers of the quraan were killed in war so Omar ebn el khattab "second khalifa" suggested that the quraan is better to be gathered in one book and at the time of Khalifa Uthman "third khalifa" it was said to him that there is differences in the dialects of quraan between the over growing muslim community ( but it doesnt really change the meaning of the words only it can be confusing later on) ,so he decided to use the Quraish dialect (of the prophet ) and they collected all the different parts of the qurran from everybody and the book previously gathered from the house of Hafse daughter of abu bakr and wife of prophet mohamad and the same Zaid ebn thabet who participated in the first gathering of the Quraan and other sahabas joined in Now " the Moshaf " was put in with the souras and ayat in the order that we now know .( At that time each one of the participants must have 2 witnesses for every ayat he memorized) . It was then recited in front of even more sahabas. Only then Uthman ordered for all the other parts and bits of quraan to be set to fire so that there wont be any different copies of parts that can make mixing . Only shiaa later on accused Uthman to burn the quraan . And i dont know why are they the ones holding to this allegations never Imam Ali. God said in the quraan that he sent down the quraan and He will preserve it . so if anybody doesnt beleive the words of the holy quraan than he is not a muslim that simple .

[@bacinthezahab3289]

God forgive me if any of the information that i gave away about Shiaa is not correct since i only heard it and nevrr really read it in any manuscript . And it should really be false information since Imam Ali never objected on any word in the quraan.

[@akbar339]

Christian only believes if the statement came from the christian scholars but not from the muslim scholars.

[@mahmoudsbeih8614]

Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Mercifu.This verse is numbered 143, Surah 286. Al-Baqara is exactly in the middle of the surah

[@mahmoudsbeih8614]

@@premansatheesan3163 from where you are

[@mahmoudsbeih8614]

The difference between human and animal is the mind. The Creator created the animals as they were necessary. Without thinking intent, Muhammad saw Monk. Is the monk an infidel in Christ? Why did the monk not write the book himself and gain fame? Who said to Muhammad, write a surah to Mary. Why only the name Maryam for women.

[@mahmoudsbeih8614]

@@premansatheesan3163 Dear brother, did you know that the bees' chromosomes are 16. Chapter bee in quran is 16. If you speak coincedence . You speak to your mind stop dont think

[@mahmoudsbeih8614]

@@premansatheesan3163 utomic wheight for iron is 57 chapter iron in quran is 57 name easa in quran is 25 times name Adam in quran is 25 its no coincedence

[@mahmoudsbeih8614]

@@premansatheesan3163 listen to this story brother . Darkness grave not easy .

[@DhammeMaxmoud]

Great news

[@akbar339]

What ever your evidence to prove that Quran is not well preserved, it wont works because 1. The Uthman version has been verified correct and no errors. 2. More than 10 prophet companions has check and verified when they compiled Al Quran to a complete sets. They were prophet companions who received god revelation direct from the prophet. The famous ten People who form the chains of narration regarding the Quran are as follows. Umar ibn al Khattab Uthman bin Affan Ali ibn abi Talib Abu Musa al Ash'ari Ubay Ibn Ka'b Abdullah ibn Masood[ Zayd Ibn Thabit Abu Hurairah Abdullah Ibn Abbas Abu al-Darda Of those above ten, the two most important people were Zayd ibn Thabit the personal scribe of Muhammad and Ubay ibn Ka'b who was the foremost authority on the Quran after Zaid. Are muslims still not to trust them for the compilation they have done. 3. Caliph Uthman and his team has confirmed and verified the set of Quran is the most perfect and any old manuscripts recovered after the compilation should be destroyed as there may contains lots of errors and no one able to verify.

[@akbar339]

@@premansatheesan3163 You mean that Salman, who booked himself to be fire wood in hell? That a useless guy.

[@akbar339]

@@premansatheesan3163 Your info about him was wrong. He never being an Islamic history student. Early life and family background Edit Ahmed Salman Rushdie[8] was born on 19 June 1947[9] in Bombay, then British India, into a Kashmiri Muslim family.[10][11] He is the son of Anis Ahmed Rushdie, a Cambridge-educated lawyer-turned-businessman, and Negin Bhatt, a teacher. Anis Rushdie was dismissed from the Indian Civil Services (ICS) after it emerged that the birth certificate submitted by him had changes to make him appear younger than he was.[12] Rushdie has three sisters.[13] He wrote in his 2012 memoir that his father adopted the name Rushdie in honour of Averroes (Ibn Rushd). He was educated at Cathedral and John Connon School, Bombay, Rugby School in Warwickshire, and King's College, Cambridge, where he read history.[9] Personal life Edit Rushdie has been married four times. He was married to his first wife Clarissa Luard[14] from 1976 to 1987 and fathered a son, Zafar (born 1979).[15] He left her in the mid-'80s for the Australian writer Robyn Davidson, to whom he was introduced by their mutual friend Bruce Chatwin.[16] His second wife was the American novelist Marianne Wiggins; they were married in 1988 and divorced in 1993. His third wife, from 1997 to 2004, was Elizabeth West; they have a son, Milan (born 1997). In 2004, he married Padma Lakshmi, an Indian-American actress, model, and host of the American reality-television show Top Chef. The marriage ended on 2 July 2007. In 1999, Rushdie had an operation to correct ptosis, a problem with the levator palpebrae muscle, according to him, was making it increasingly difficult for him to open his eyes. "If I hadn't had an operation, in a couple of years from now I wouldn't have been able to open my eyes at all," he said.[17] Since 2000, Rushdie has "lived mostly near Union Square" in Ne

[@kletingabang4387]

What is the meaning "original Quran"? There is no such definition in earth. All of the book of Quran is copies, even the first mushaf made from bones and barks is copies. Because Quran is not the letters that written but letters that memories. From the first person who received the Quran not writes It down into something.

[@kletingabang4387]

And I am a Muslim.

[@kletingabang4387]

@@premansatheesan3163 lu mungkin orang sekitar sini. Rumah lu mana bro?

[@kletingabang4387]

@@premansatheesan3163 such long words but what is the meaning? What point you want to show? is Quran made in arabian or do you hope finding mistakes from the grammars of some Surat? Read my first comment. Quran is the "book" of memories, the meaning is Quran coming down to earth through speaking. Nabiullah received from Jibril A.S. spokes then repeated and memories the words of Quran. Even sahabat is reciting by listening from Rasulullah. So what is your points?

[@kletingabang4387]

@@premansatheesan3163 all your talks is nonsenses. There is no point exchange words with you. May Alloh grant you hell in earth(sijjil).

[@mahmoudsbeih8614]

do you know brothers kromosom bee is 16 chapter bee in quran is 16 utomic wheight for iron is 57 chapter iron in quran is 57 name easa jesuss in quran is 25 times name Adam in quran is 25 times.no coincedence in quran no coincedence in this life

[@barnettronald230]

This video is way out of date. Furthermore Dr. Lumbard did not say anything new even then. As for the account of the two "recensions" under Abu Bakr and Uthman and final "final" version under the latter, this all comes from Al-Bukhari, who was writing in the 9th century, long after the death of Muhammad in 632. As for the isnad or chain of transmission of the Qur'an even today Muslim scholars can't agree on the textual and oral nature of the "text." The fact is there is no complete Qur'an with all 114 Surahs during the first Islamic century from the Hijrah (622) to around 722. The main Qur'anic manuscripts are all too late and problematical. The content of the Birmingham ms. is pre-Islamic and irrelevant to the present discussion. As for the 63 fragments, which make up only some 96% of the Qur'an (not 100%) they are mostly short and haven't even beem dated properly or collated with the current Hafs text, the basis of the standard Qur'an today. As for carbon 14 dating, this only tells us the date of the parchment not the writing on it. If you are going to discuss research on the traditional Muslim account of Muhammad and the Qur'an at least use some up-to-date material.

[@jelumbard]

Behnam Sadeghi and Uwe Bergmann., ““The Codex of a Companion of the Prophet and the Qurʾān of the Prophet.” Arabica 57 (2010): 343-436.
 Behnam Sadeghi and Mohsen Goudarzi, “Ṣanʿāʾ 1 and the origins of the Qurʾān”, Der Islam 87 (2012), 1-129. Nicolai Sinai, 2014 “When did the consonantal skeleton of the Quran reach closure? Part I”, BSOAS 77/2 (2014), 273-92. Nicolai Sinai, “When did the consonantal skeleton of the Quran reach closure? Part II”, BSOAS 77/3 (2014). 509-21. Michael Cook, “The stemma of the regional codices of the Koran”, in G.K. Lividas (ed.), Graeco-Arabica 9-10: Festschrift in Honour of V. Christides. Athens: Institute for Graeco-Oriental and African Studies, 2004, 89-104. Marijn van Putten, “‘The Grace of God’ as evidence for a written Uthmanic archetype: the importance of shared orthographic idiosyncrasies,” Bulletin of SOAS, 82, 2 (2019), 271-288. Hythem Sidky, “On the Regionality of Qurʾānic Codices,” JIQSA 5 (2020), 133-210. - Harald Motzki, 2001. “The collection of the Qurʾān: a reconsideration of Western views in light of recent methodological developments”, Der Islam 78, (2001) 1-34. - Yasin Dutton, “An early Muṣḥaf according to the reading of Ibn ʿĀmir”, Journal of Qur’anic Studies 3/1 (2001), 71-89. - Yasin Dutton, “Some notes on the British Library’s ‘oldest Qurʾan manuscript’ (Or. 2165)”, Journal of Qur’anic Studies 6/1 (2004), 43-71. - Francois Déroche. Les manuscrits du coran: Aux origines de la calligraphie coranique. Paris: Bibliothèque nationale 1983. - François Déroche. The Abbasid Tradition: Qurʾans of the 8th to the 10th centuries AD. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. - François Déroche, La transmission écrite du Coran dans les débuts de l’islam: Le codex Parisino-petropolitanus. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009. - François Déroche, Qurʾans of the Umayyads: A First Overview. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2014.

[@guzwa2334]

This video is 4 yrs old, most if not all of what he said has been debunked. Please share the LATEST research on All the manuscripts.

[@WelcomeToTheRezvolution]

What has been debunked?

[@WelcomeToTheRezvolution]

@@premansatheesan3163 You're talking about Qiraʼat? This has been known about since the time of the Prophet. When there was disagreements, they came together and found a solution. Even Uthman, when he put the Quran together did so so the majority could be used despite him basing it on one. The difference in Qira'at are not much in a way to change the meaning of Quran. What we understand from the Arabic original text is that this difference in pronunciation exists, but they all go in the same meaning and change nothing from the faith or the Shari'a. Muslim scholars say that this small differences make the meaning reaches and in some case is just a difference in pronunciation because the readers are from a different countries. Just as English has different spellings, pronunciation and even usage of words depending on British English or American English (or Australian English). Colour and color. Chips and fries (Crisps and chips). And so on.

[@WelcomeToTheRezvolution]

@@premansatheesan3163 I'll be honest, this may be a language issue as I'm having trouble following what you are saying. Can you re-write the last two replies so I can understand what you're exactly referring to? Edit: Regarding 96:1-8, I'm not sure why you think this should be first. Can you explain why you chose this in your opinion being first? One Surah not having the same starting point as the others was well known for a long time before anyone has brought it up. The Sunni and Shia divide initially started over who should take over from the Prophet in leading the Muslims (to simplify the issue).

[@WelcomeToTheRezvolution]

@@premansatheesan3163 I know that in order to remove dispute, others were ordered to be destroyed. These also included personal copies of people who made their own notes and written in their own style. Even the way it was put together under Uthman was so that the Qira'at can be used. But your explanation doesn't say why the verse you mentioned should be first. There isn't a link between what you've just posted and the verse you say should be first.

[@WelcomeToTheRezvolution]

@@premansatheesan3163 You've inserted speculations into your comment and little to actually back this up. You clearly aren't a native English speaker or proficient in it as some things you've typed don't make sense. I'll respond to what I do understand. The Prophet was orphaned at the age of 6. He was raised by first his grandfather and then his uncle. So, the speculation you made is unfounded. At best I can assume you made a guess based on little to no information (you present none here). At worse, you basically made it up. Aisha only went to live with the Prophet when she came of age (consummation of the marriage). There was no sexual conduct between then until then. Can you link to any hadiths that say he did thighing with Aisha before consummation of their marriage? Can you re-write what you are saying about Maria? I don't understand it. It makes no sense. How is that (black stone) related to idolatry? You're making no sense. Maybe show your thought process on this. You've stated a well known story about the black stone. Yet, from a religious point of view, it's not prayed to. So I don't see how you can take one story and link it to idolatry. It seems you already came to a conclusion and looked for something to back it up and took this, despite the link being none existent to what you conclude.

[@Leon-jp7ch]

Here i disagree, everyone knows that the Qur'an has not been preserved, there are multiple Qur'an, Muslims scholars has admitted that, Why still lie about it?

[@jakelister6386]

Whichuslim scholars and where are these different Qurans Show evidence of this if every one knows anfs it's common knowledge then should be easy for you to pick one surah and show where another Quran has it completely different

[@jelumbard]

Behnam Sadeghi and Uwe Bergmann., ““The Codex of a Companion of the Prophet and the Qurʾān of the Prophet.” Arabica 57 (2010): 343-436.
 Behnam Sadeghi and Mohsen Goudarzi, “Ṣanʿāʾ 1 and the origins of the Qurʾān”, Der Islam 87 (2012), 1-129. Nicolai Sinai, 2014 “When did the consonantal skeleton of the Quran reach closure? Part I”, BSOAS 77/2 (2014), 273-92. Nicolai Sinai, “When did the consonantal skeleton of the Quran reach closure? Part II”, BSOAS 77/3 (2014). 509-21. Michael Cook, “The stemma of the regional codices of the Koran”, in G.K. Lividas (ed.), Graeco-Arabica 9-10: Festschrift in Honour of V. Christides. Athens: Institute for Graeco-Oriental and African Studies, 2004, 89-104. Marijn van Putten, “‘The Grace of God’ as evidence for a written Uthmanic archetype: the importance of shared orthographic idiosyncrasies,” Bulletin of SOAS, 82, 2 (2019), 271-288. Hythem Sidky, “On the Regionality of Qurʾānic Codices,” JIQSA 5 (2020), 133-210. - Harald Motzki, 2001. “The collection of the Qurʾān: a reconsideration of Western views in light of recent methodological developments”, Der Islam 78, (2001) 1-34. - Yasin Dutton, “An early Muṣḥaf according to the reading of Ibn ʿĀmir”, Journal of Qur’anic Studies 3/1 (2001), 71-89. - Yasin Dutton, “Some notes on the British Library’s ‘oldest Qurʾan manuscript’ (Or. 2165)”, Journal of Qur’anic Studies 6/1 (2004), 43-71. - Francois Déroche. Les manuscrits du coran: Aux origines de la calligraphie coranique. Paris: Bibliothèque nationale 1983. - François Déroche. The Abbasid Tradition: Qurʾans of the 8th to the 10th centuries AD. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. - François Déroche, La transmission écrite du Coran dans les débuts de l’islam: Le codex Parisino-petropolitanus. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009. - François Déroche, Qurʾans of the Umayyads: A First Overview. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2014.

[@fxnessfather6611]

Mashallah

[@delcior]

@Brave Soul Fun fact, only in Qur'an there is a promise of preserving it. There is no sign of it in Bible or Torah. Oh btw Allah Almighty did not make New Testament, it's just stories of 4 anonymous people. Gospel was what Jesus taught.

[@delcior]

@Brave Soul Qur an is not a book - it is information/message that Prophet (peace be upon him) has shared with his companions. This Qur an was in hearts of thousands of people, who later have compiled it. Margin of error is so low that we cannot question reliability. Also, proof of preservance is also in I'jaz - quality of Quran. We can see that rhymes are there as they should be. If any word have been omitted or mistaken, we would see it. yaqeeninstitute.org/suleiman-hani/introduction-to-ijaz-al-quran-the-miraculous-nature-of-the-quran