is the picture of Charles a picture of the anti-christ? Of course not!

This is a summary of the growth in anti-christ mythology- much of it is twaddle.
🛒 Explore my unique, fun political merch at our new store! Click the link below.
etsy.com/shop/ProfessorTimsCa... !
Join me, Professor Tim Wilson, as I dissect today's headlines, offering my insights and perspectives on the latest in British politics and global affairs. With a keen eye and a bit of wit, we delve into the news that shapes our world.
🔔 Subscribe to our channel to stay up-to-date with my latest reactions and analyses. Join our community of informed viewers who value depth, nuance, and a sprinkle of humour in their news consumption.
🎥 Must-Watch: Explore My Most Popular Video Ever (5.5m+ views) on How To Write A Good Essay: • How to write a good essay
🌍 My Shorts provide concise insights and reactions to keep you informed: / @professortimwilson
This channel serves as your go-to source for thoughtful and sometimes slightly satirical commentary on current events, political shifts, and the stories that matter. From deep dives into the mechanics of the UK government to global political dynamics and everything in between, we cover it all with the aim of enlightening, entertaining, and encouraging informed discussions.
#News #PoliticalCommentary #TalkTV #GBNews #DailyMirror #WorldPolitics #GuidoFawkes #DailyMail #TalkTV

[@gyzmo181]

Irrespective of the portrait I just don't like him, never have and never will......

[@daphnemicka5807]

My sentiments' exactly...He is the 'Anti-Christ' if not then definitely one of the Devils Possies' - Come Prof. don't speak lawlessness, you obviously a CHARLES follower! Charles is a evil Father....not worthy to be called father

[@lydiabarber8931]

He’s even very unintelligent. Hopeless man.

[@babysisdolls3336]

every day i see Harry as a whistleblower ...what he wrote and said becomes more true.

[@user-fw5zd9nd1r]

Yes, I remember Harry saying, "If you knew, what I know, then you would leave too"

[@lc9902]

So why is he not saying? He would do the anti monarchists a favor!

[@Bellas1717]

@@lc9902He has. In 'Spare'.

[@bornicks2]

​@@Bellas1717Just the top of it. I have a feeling there is much more he didn't write.

[@dianahigham8944]

@@bornicks2 there is... look how Diana ended up when she started talking...

[@jolist3721]

This is the most publicity that Charlie has had since his mother passed away.

[@nighttrain438]

Perhaps thats the whole reason for the portrait.

[@isabellesmith5253]

@nighttrain438 there is no good reason to waste 8 millions on such frivolity.....while people are homeless and hungry

[@johngammon963]

It's such an awful painting.

[@sharronjones1017]

The artist painted what he experienced! ACCURATELY🤔🙄🙄😳 Unlike the British media!😳👋🏼

[@Bellas1717]

@@sharronjones1017Charles was totally wrapped in red when he sat for the portrait?

[@dianahigham8944]

@@Bellas1717 no. the artist had a vision

[@Bellas1717]

@@dianahigham8944 Maybe read the comment I reference and to which I was responding. Mine is sarcasm.

[@dianahigham8944]

@@Bellas1717 so was mine

[@americanroyalsuccess]

This picture truly represents Charles's life and tribulations. The message from the picture is that Charles is either in hell or on his way to hell. Actions speak louder than words.

[@knightyknight5399]

Down with the Crown

[@isabellesmith5253]

Well Charlie is not a looker is he.....I wonder how much that horrid painting costs the taxpayer....complete waste of money.....

[@dianahigham8944]

8 million squid I hear

[@sharronjones1017]

8million£££

[@nighttrain438]

It was comissioned by the Drapers' Group as a 50th anniversary membership gift. I believe it was said they paid 3million.

[@carolynellis387]

Whaaat? 8 million quid? He ought to pay for it, not taxpayers

[@sharronjones1017]

@@nighttrain438 8 million

[@carolineannburrows7845]

The painting is 8ft. The message in my view. It shows him emerging/standing in the Pits of Hell.

[@djbogz1921]

How do you know what the pits of hell look like?

[@MegaKapo12]

​@@djbogz1921It kinda a look like Blackpool.

[@user-fw5zd9nd1r]

💯

[@sharronjones1017]

@@djbogz1921Chuck claims to be the head of the church! Looks like the portrait is the antithesis of Christ!🤔🙄🙄😳

[@dianahigham8944]

@@sharronjones1017 sadly he doesn't just claim to be the head of church. thanks to Henry 8th he actually legally is. Head of Anglican church that is. What a worthy example just like his great great great.... granddaddy...

[@sheilacarter7875]

P.S the portrait is awful

[@sharronjones1017]

If a man gain the whole world & has no love or charity . . . What kind of man declares war on his son of peace & love???

[@munasuut3736]

Charles fried in hell fire thats what i saw...the potrait is just an embarrassing eerie looking charles being roasted in hell fire...period.

[@yieyie4262]

But when you mirror the portrait you get a very disturbing picture of something evil in the painting, very dark! Any thoughts Professor Tim?

[@sharronjones1017]

That would be Cowmoola!

[@Jaydyte]

True, because the artist himself is “dark”, unclean and crude; he even created a thrown out portrait of George Bush with cutouts of porn magazines 🤮

[@lindaritter1343]

Absolutely

[@missylearned9821]

I’m shocked that’s not the actual topic of discussion. Shocked but not really surprised when saw what it was showing when mirrored.

[@Choochoo535]

I saw this on a earlier some American said the same and showed the portrait in two mirrors upside down.

[@sandyhaggland4430]

It's sadistic creepy hidious.... 🤢

[@teef4]

Fire of Hell thinks he’s above the law!

[@lakiva1000]

What kind of picture is it I've never seen anything like it.🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢

[@lindaritter1343]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@Cherrytune386]

The portrait is aptly coloured. An awful nasty man. NMK

[@barbaravassell2478]

That's what I see when I look at them.Evil evil evil evil. When you meet your maker you will have a lot to answe 4 all the evil that you bestow onto the world.

[@alexsidney4796]

I hope there isn’t a grammar requirement also.

[@lindasemple4687]

People say art is trivial, worthless yet look how it affects us! How magnetic this image is! People who don’t normally talk about art are talking! Art is so powerful, people should wonder why, what is it that affects us so much?

[@lc9902]

Talking art and know nothing about it.

[@alexsidney4796]

Art’s worthlessness must be the reason why a shitload of it was destroyed by Henry VIII.

[@audreyginter3324]

The picture of the bloodstain crown perfect depicted .

[@Jacqueline-zm8oe]

The painting looks very evil and scary. It reflect his evil soul perfectly. Looks like he is burning in hell or a demon.

[@TeddyBongo-zf1ih]

Of course not. The Anti-Christ comes swathed in blue polka dots! He's highly fashionable. More seriously, I enjoyed your mini lecture. Thanks.

[@israeldiegoriveragenius2th164]

You would make a good conspiracy theorist, you have a hidden talent.

[@karinvantubbergh3418]

King Charles 111 knows exactly what his portrait is about.

[@alexsidney4796]

Yep, probably about 20 grand.

[@mrsc7517]

The picture is but a symbol of his vanity. What qualifies him as being The Anti Christ , along with the Archibishop of Canterbury is their disobedience of Biblical teaching. 1st Samuel 8:10-18 Warnings against earthly Kings. "They are sinful, prone to corruption, injustices of all kinds, and many times do not have the best interests of their people at heart. Doesn't get any clearer than that, now does it. The Archbishop, God's emissary, at the Coronation, appeals to the Nation,to, "Pledge their Allegiance to the King". 🤔 The hypocrisy of Church & State is mind boggling. Viva la revolution 😂😂

[@dianahigham8944]

soo right! the allegiance to the king was pure vanity and came from KC. when people pushed back it was change to have come from AoC and "only if you would like to". twisted evil in my opinion

[@lolalove39573]

Amen, so true!

[@dianahigham8944]

the allegiance was supposed to be compulsory especially if you are CoE and it came from KC. when peoplw pushed back it was announced that it was "just a suggestoin" and came from AoC. Hipocrisy at its finest

[@ruthguthrie1099]

It illustrates the blood lost at the bequest of the royals.

[@garywilkinson4560]

Have a look at Tim Cohen 'antichrist and a cup of tea',and what about charles statue 'saviour of the world',also at his coronation he was anointed,king of Israel.!

[@ProfessorTimWilson]

yes, much of this is hokum I am afraid

[@user-fw5zd9nd1r]

💯

[@jenteale]

@@ProfessorTimWilson I agree.

[@discoveringlisa486]

The antichrist makes a peace treaty with Israel, he would have to be someone the Jews accepted. I don't see how this could be Charles

[@Lee-qj6fi]

@@ProfessorTimWilson such a closed mind...how sad....

[@PauletteMyers-eo7bn]

YES-YES IT IS.

[@catchloe1989]

Beg pardon, his heraldry & sigils say different!! 😁😁😁

[@joannoliver5588]

The anti-christ comes back pretending to be Jesus not himself.

[@sharronjones1017]

Chuck a known philanderer, that obeys his evil queen, ended the life of his children’s mom, breaks his own laws, does nothing to end the siege between his sons, does nothing to protect anyone but himself & his evil queen, cares nothing about the church & the laws of the church, shows no kindness or care but revels in punishing those that piss off his wife, & especially does not speak truth. Where’s Kate?? Why does he coverup what happened to this young woman who provided his grandchildren & the future Heir & spare . . . Where are these children? Why is this such a hard truth to share? Has her fate been sealed as Diana’s? God is Truth!

[@sharronjones1017]

But Chuck claims to be the head of the church, I thought that was God???

[@alexsidney4796]

@@sharronjones1017 No, that’d be Henry VIII, the Baron Harkonnen of the Middle Ages.

[@reddscarolynr8577]

It's like the Empire New Clothes. You got to say you like it, for he is the King, but to be honest it looks sinister and void of life.

[@user-fw5zd9nd1r]

Of course it's demonic. Are you blind ?!!!! 😮

[@Bellas1717]

Isn’t Trump calling himself 'The Chosen One'?

[@sharronjones1017]

There’s more than one demon roaming the earth!

[@alexsidney4796]

Yes but there’s good people on both sides.

[@vixtex]

Of course. He’s a legend in his own mind.

[@nighttrain438]

Thank you very much! So much of what I was taught is incorrect and its perpeturated by people who we see as educated and knowledgable.

[@stevencharlton7693]

For some odd reason, whenever I hear the Aunty Christ, I always seem to have an image of Jesus doing the rounds dressed like Mrs. Doubtfire saying "Bless Youuuuuuuuuu!!!! LOL But to be seriouse. Although I am not a Royalist, I do dabble in a bit of arty fartiness myself from time to time, and I do think it's a very good painting...

[@lifewriter7455]

It's a picture contemplating over the concept of infected blood transfusion through decades of British institutionalized care under the protection of the representative of God on earth. Tha King. 😎🖤👍

[@jenteale]

C3 is a vain narcissist. He needs a legacy to outdo the 70 year reign of Our Majesty, the late Queen

[@dianahigham8944]

😂 good luck with that

[@jenteale]

@@dianahigham8944 To be known as the last king of a country and commonwealth ? That would ensure infamy

[@dianahigham8944]

@@jenteale oh yeah, the infamy will follow him to the grave and beyond... something I am sure he will be very proud of as most narcissists are... his mother is turning in her grave as we speak

[@keewng]

King Charles III probably enjoyed fun at "La Tomatina" and because of his sausage fingers received more tomatoes, it's not anti-christ!

[@marie-joselinebagarirayose2817]

😂😂😂😂😂😂 hahahhhhh

[@MichaelK.-xl2qk]

Professor, you've overlooked the primary source describing the Antichrist: John 5:43. Here, Jesus is giving a monologue to the Jewish Pharisees who were persecuting him for healing on the sabbath. He says, "I have come in my father's name, and you do not accept me; but when another comes in his own name, him you will accept." The Greek word for another here means another of the same type, not another of a different kind. The clear meaning is that the Jews will accept another Jewish messiah instead of him, one who comes not from the Father in heaven, but according to his own authority - the Antichrist. It is beyond doubt that the Antichrist will be a Jewish messiah, and your pack of criminal friends over a Chabad Lubavich are quite chatty about it, in fact. This is clearly the trajectory of the State of Israel, which brings forth fruits from its heart according to its demonic nature. What are the fruits which the generation of the Antichrist brings forth? Revelation 9:20-21 enumerates them: Worship of demons and idols; murders, witchcraft, sexual immorality and theft. There are indeed many antichrists, both small and large. And the above should be the test by which we can recognise one. And if King Charles is found guilty of a plurality or all of the above offenses against God and Man, then he is an antichrist. But since he is not the Jewish messiah recognized by the State of Israel as their king, he cannot categorically be The Antichrist.

[@ProfessorTimWilson]

I shall speak further and in more detail about this, but I am afraid, while I am deliughted that you have taken so much time, you are wrong about Lubavitch, the interpretation of the texts and your support of Tim Cohen.

[@MichaelK.-xl2qk]

@@ProfessorTimWilson I appreciate your engagement with the issue, but you are incorrect in inferring that I know Tim Cohen, or what he represents. Secondly, I welcome your argument regarding the texts, but the Greek word "allos" is unequivocal in refering to another in a series of the same kind. Furthermore, it is the mind of the Church to which you claim to belong, that the Antichrist must be a Jew from the tribe of Dan. So it is you who holds a contradiction irrationally here, by your profession of Greek Orthodoxy in plain view of the fact that you do not adhere to its dogmas or morality. And as for the Chabad, they are a criminal intelligence front and a drug dealing cult, and they will be dealt with severely.

[@vermary]

Charles is surrounded by the wailing blood of Diana. I can even see a rottweiler peeping over his right shoulder.

[@vixtex]

🤣

[@Mrmorlam1]

Red is a highly spiritual colour. Great fascinating portrait. Typical nonsense from those who know little.

[@TheFever77]

I’m starting to like this guy!

[@honberg193]

When I first saw this painting. Apart from others comments. Are we learning more about the Kings culinary tastes. His love of tbe tomatoes 🙂

[@andyking6051]

As i have said on your page before Tim , i think that this picture has been painted / designed to give the impression of all sorts of things including its dark and mystic interpretability to play the minds of the public , remember katepicturegate ? Come on were being played again as usual these days to believe these impressions are somehow genuinely symbolic of the sitter , all very skillfully done , ultimately to make the public look stupid , but particularly conspiracy theorists .

[@Anita-gp1gv]

I think the uninformed is over dignifying Prince Charles. Charles childhood was not pleasurable. His uncle Dickie Mountbatten had too much influence and input into the child Prince Charles. Not only did King Charles have to stand looking to the future as King with The Queen Mother and strong figure The Duke of Edinburgh fighting over him, but also Dysfunctional spoiled Prince Andrew contending to take the Throne, by whispering in his mummy’s ear to hand the Kingship to himself instead. So I think this is OTT, although there is something Macabre about the Portrait, but Chinese and Asians do tend to dwell and favour the colour Red.

[@lc9902]

If anything he is looking into the future. The gaze in his eyes more than suggest that. At a closer look, he is crying from his left eye. To us the right eye. Yet his right eye is stern.

[@jenteale]

Look at the eye shape on the creature in the heraldry of his new coat of arms

[@oliverbell1937]

The artist obviously knows his subject well….more a true likeness than those fantasy portraits per usual 👍🏼

[@Geffo555]

I like the painting. But then art is subjective to most of us. Charles has a benign look if anything. How is it Satanic?

[@user-ku9yg8li9f]

Maybe it's the king, through the eyes of a butterfly, as there's a butterfly in the picture?.

[@thomasbradley2225]

Admittedly, a most intriguing canvas seen objectively within secular sight. I noted Taylor Marshall had a video out commenting the anti Christ speculation, however it's all tosh rubbish. No doubt the artist's imaginative brush has struck lightning with fiery cast; and, the work owns undeniable classic portraiture with immediacy amidst circular acclaim. Wheat siphon conceited brushstroke chaff indeed but simply stunning to the mind.

[@paulbotaslillington6828]

I would like it placed in the right place so it can be appreciated and also listen to the artist explaining the portrait.

[@williamcannon7262]

King Charles would be absolutely rubbish at being the Anti Christ.

[@TeddyBongo-zf1ih]

Ha ha ha! that's funny. 🤣

[@dianahigham8944]

king of tampons more like

[@Sindi63084]

😂😂😂 agree! He's too fragile to be the AC

[@marlenebutler5238]

Yes

[@eileenclark7744]

This was a very interesting lecture. I really enjoyed it and would love some more. Relating your studies to the present is fascinating.

[@himarkburdett9378]

Not so much Anti Christ but the 4 horse 🐴 of the apocalypse The Tory party is the pale horse it's rider's name is death and Hades following after it

[@edwinmoreton2136]

The portrait isn't Art and the so-called 'Artist' isn't an Artist - he is a painter/illustrator. The resulting portrait is an example of kitsch, Hollywood-style sensationalism. When you consider the quality of the Royal Collection, much of which was originally acquired by Charles I, it is surprising that Charles III agreed to be portrayed by someone working in a brash illustrative style from photographs. The portrait displays poor artistic taste, lack of judgement, no historical awareness, and very little psychological insight. Great fun though - the whole thing!

[@10whiten99]

Of course it is art. You may not like it but it’s still art regardless of its “taste” and “historical awareness”. I don’t like a lot of the stuff displayed in the Tate Modern but I wouldn’t say it’s not art. Whether it’s beautiful is a different matter.

[@edwinmoreton2136]

@@10whiten99 Yeah, it could be bad art? There is a difference between art with a small 'a' and Art with a big 'A'. Boss Ross, though popular with amateur painters, was never in the same league as Rembrandt!

[@scoobysnax9787]

Good & Evil in all of us! What ever happened to the Infinite Transcendental Ego? Religious experience is hopeless with out a little bit of transcendence.

[@LizA0488]

Twaddle is a great word. I am adopting that word.

[@denisetaylor4256]

Yes king rat that's one way of describing him

[@alexsidney4796]

Well, there’s some real twaddle BTL on this one. Shame no one is discursively interested in art, theological history or the Bible. Seems the shackles of short form needs its own Christ.

[@peggylee2267]

I'd suggest looking at the king's heraldic achievement whilst reading Revelation. You might change your mind.

[@rogerjones8050]

How rude!

[@thommythomas7948]

The real point is satan quotes the scriptures quite well … see the temptation of Christ in the desert … but very few people can speak the Word of God for hours and hours…indeed St Paul observed the Lord’s Day in Acts of the Apostles 20:7-11 from Sunday morning till Monday morning day break … that’s St Paul, a man filled with the Holy Spirit and his continuous preaching shows this… now there are Godmen everywhere, those who claim to be God … these are the anti Christ … King Charles to my knowledge hasn’t claimed to be God … but who knows, what he thinks he is …

[@maimericks80]

That painting is awful I am afraid. There is nothing appealing about it.

[@denisetaylor4256]

May not be Antichrist but he is Anti something,I think he's wicked

[@thelmatruett356]

Vile picture

[@Cherrytune386]

Like the man himself then.

[@griffin5779]

Interesting I agree that the Picture of Charles doesn’t make him the Antichrist but if he wanted an ugly picture he could have picked one less “hellish” .. makes me wonder about the artist that painted it. And yes a lot of what is attributed to the Antichrist seems to be constructed.My personal thought is that there are people who can catch a glimpse of the future and our view of the Antichrist is more an Archetype of what people who glimpse that future interrupted though their religious beliefs. However It is hard to understand how you can read revelations and not see it as apocalyptic and depicting an “end time” power or figure that brings about great destruction. Question if you will. Are there translations of the Bible before the KJB that utterly mistranslate Daniel 11:37?

[@MaxHallam-te2np]

It's so sad that 'Christ' is thought of as an individual - the individual was called Jesus. To be 'Christed' is to achieve a higher level of consciousness or, in Eastern belief systems, to become enlightened. The Book of Revelation is maybe the most misunderstood part of the Bible. FWIW, I assure you that 'the end of the age' to which Jesus referred, is now....the end of the Age of Pisces, and the start of the Age of Aquarius.

[@bertalunadescalzo8160]

És horroroso el cuadro! Da miedo

[@JamesDickson-vs5of]

Strangely, i watched Monty python the other day, marty Feldman take's his pet " thing" to the vet in a huge laundry basket ,, it followed him home from the pub andhe felt sorry for it , so decided to keep it , he told another pet owner, he's tried to read up on it,to find out what kind of creature it is, but after month's of research, the only reference to it was in the bible, " book of revelation's" , usual python nonsense, and so is the suggestion that his majesty the " king" is the anti christ,,, after a few days settling in and letting the paint dry, i am warming to it more and more (no pun intended), up close it is a superb painting,, professor please can you cover the joker , once you see him, you can unsee him, talk about the anti christ! Lol 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 happy healthy peace ✌️

[@peterford436]

Most commentary centres on the monarch butterfly and the mirror image depiction of a goat...The red mist seems to signify blood? It would seem the artist is hinting at something hidden at the very least and, as always, there are as many interpretations as viewers...

[@garymackay4268]

The antichrist 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@marie-joselinebagarirayose2817]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 hahahhhhh

[@ivetabrowne1140]

It was a shock but now I absolutely love it ❤

[@lenachambers6371]

We believe the King James Version of the Bible. Not mytholog.

[@nevinaltunoren1818]

Camilla ve charles gormek istemiyorum

[@Sindi63084]

Another one coming in his own name and people hearing him was PAUL. He came with a gospel oposite of Yeshua's and today people follow Paul, not Yeshua.

[@Jaydyte]

No, no, no Charles is not the anti-Christ👋the idea is not even biblical but ignorant conspiracy theory. Charles has NEVER denied Jesus Christ, anti-Christ is one who denies that Jesus is the Christ. The idea he is, is sheer nonsense 😅, poor Charles is also caught in the fray, I don’t think , he, Charles, likes the portrait as well.

[@penoge]

The Dajjal of the Islam (meant in Sure 27:83 of the Quran) refers to the beast coming from the earth in Revelation 13:11 ff. in the Bible which is the symbol of the Antichrist. According to Revelation 13:17 f. the number of his name is 666. This refers to the value of his name when the letters were taken as numbers and these were summed up. In the Bible two names occur which have the value 666, Jerimoth and Sethur, and both were Jews. Therefore it is very probably that the Antichrist (Dajjal) is also a Jew. According to Revelation 13:12 the Antichrist exercises all the (military, see below) power of the first beast from the sea of Revelation 13:1 ff. before him and causes the whole world to worship the beast. This beast is the fourth world empire already described in Daniel 7:7. The four world empires of Daniel 7:4 ff. are: • Babylonia, • Media, • Persia • and Greece. The last empire is mostly interpreted to mean Rome, but Revelation 17:8 excludes this interpretation: the beast (= the fourth world empire) • was (= the historical Greek world empire) • and is not (= at the time of the Roman Empire when the Revelation was written!) •and will be there (= in our times). In Revelation 13:2 details are given which show that it has characteristics of the three world empires before it which allows to understand which country of our times is meant: • It is like a leopard, the image of the third world empire of Daniel 7:6 = the USSR. The equality is that this fourth world empire, like the USSR (the fall of which was foretold in Daniel 8), dominates almost an entire continent. • It has a bear's feet. The bear is the image of the second world empire in Daniel 7:5 = the Tsarist Russia. The feet represent movement and development. What is meant is that the fourth world empire, like the tsarist Russia, wages many wars (compare Daniel 7:5) and that its internal development is similar to that of the tsarist Russia, which led to the revolution. • It has the mouth of a lion. The lion is the image of the first world empire in Daniel 7:4 = the British Empire. The mouth here stands for the language, so the fourth world empire speaks the same language as the first one: English. It is therefore clear that this fourth world empire, depicted as a beast, can only mean the USA which in reallity is the last remaining superpower. For these reasons it already makes sense to see the G7 states in the seven heads of the beast. This is confirmed by Revelation 17:9, according to which the seven heads are seven mountains (= prominent states). They are part of the beast = the fourth world empire, so they are connected to it for the better or for the worse. But according to Revelation 17:10 the seven heads are also seven kings (= rulers) which rule one after another. Therefore they, like the ten horns in Daniel 7:24 (in Revelation 17:12 they differently represent allies of the beast), must mean presidents of the USA (the eleventh of Daniel 7:24 must be equal to the eighth of Revelation 17:10). This includes a head with a mortal wound that has been healed. But if the mortal wound could be healed, it cannot be meant the physical death. I interprete it to mean the political death, for which also the "eighth" ruler of Revelation 17:11 speaks (which must be identical to the eleventh of Daniel 7:24), which is from the seven and appears after the seventh, which "should stay for a little while" (just one term?). But Revelation 13:2 also says that this fourth world empire is the kingdom of Satan, because the dragon there refers to Revelation 12 and according to Revelation 12:12 he represents the devil. So, the Antichrist belongs neither to the fourth world empire nor to the G7, but according to Revelation 13:12 he exercises the entire (military, otherwise he would be one of the seven heads) power of the fourth world empire and, according to Revelation 13:13, he even let fire fall from the sky. Whom could that possibly mean? Now, according to Revelation 17:3, the Whore Babylon also sits on a scarlet beast with 7 heads and 10 horns. Despite the color, which is only mentioned there, this refers to the above described and interpreted beast from the sea of Revelation 13:1 ff. which itself points back to the fourth beast of Daniel 7:7 which means the last world empire. The sitting on this beast can be interpreted in two ways: • it may mean that she is a resident in that country and/or • that she rides the beast and therefore exercises political influence. Because of the interpretation of the first beast of Daniel 7:4 as referring to the British Empire (which colonized North America), I initially interpreted the Whore Babylon as referring to this empire, but then I came to a different interpretation based on 1. Peter 5:13, which fits better with the other statements: the Whore Babylon means Jerusalem! In the New Testament, the name Babylon only appears in four books: • In the genealogy of Jesus Christ in Matthew 1, • in a quote from Amos 5:27 in Acts 7:43 (in Amos it reads ''Damascus''), • in 1. Peter 5:13 (where it can only mean Jerusalem) • and in various places in Revelation. But what is crucial is the statement in Revelation 18:24 (compare also Revelation 16:6; 17:6). This makes no sense in relation to Great Britain, but it does make sense in relation to Israel, which is consistent with Matthew 23:32 ff. and Luke 11:49 ff. and 13:34 and Revelation 13:7 ff. BUT: Despite the fact that Jerusalem is the only city which in the Bible is accused of having killed it's prophets and holy people, the Whore Babylon cannot mean the historical Jerusalem! According to Revelation 17:3, the Whore Babylon sits on the beast from the sea of Revelation 13:1 ff. which represents the USA and according to Revelation 17:9 on the seven hills which represent the G7. So she is a resident of the USA and of the G7 states. Therefore the Whore Babylon must refer to the Jews living in the USA and in the G7 states. But according to Revelation 17:18 she is also a "big city" and has "the kingship over the kings (= the governments) of the earth" and according to Revelation 18:3 "the merchants of the earth became rich through the power (!) of her lushness". Moreover Revelation 17:15 (compare 18:17) shows it as a port city! So what must therefore be meant? The port city of New York, which is the seat of the UNO (compare Revelation 17:18) and the seat of the stock exchange (compare Revelation 18:3)!

[@SL-sd3sg]

putin

[@seekthetruthfindit6879]

I was thinking about the painting and I think it's genius. Both, the artist and the subject received a lot of publicity and what more do you need in times when attention is everything?

[@DropdudeJohn]

All this negativity abut what I think is a striking portrait, to me it symbolises rebirth and invigoration, a new monarch taking up their service to continue the great service our last monarch gave us, and with the benefit of a UK free from the chains of the EU, or at least most of the chains.

[@djbogz1921]

No. Because there is no such thing anyway.

[@cynthiathompson6830]

I Loved you Tim Wilson but you know nothing about that prophecy if you every have ALIVE WE WILL HAVE DEBATE FROM SCRIpTures

[@Anita-gp1gv]

Scholars are expected to propound the Scriptures from a Scholarly angle, not an Evangelical stance.

[@Smoothjock]

The buzz of absolute Ballox.