Is There ANY Feature This Breitling Watch DOESN'T Have?

[@watchfinder]

Signup to the Watchfinder Newsletter for our latest special offers, limited edition giveaways and exclusive events: tr.ee/cR_siwlgB1

[@myyord7963]

It's gonna be hard to match this one. Now you see why Tudor puts a Breitling in their wanna be chronographs (hint: same reason why Daytona used the Zenith's movement at the time). All that is the reason that the Rolex-Tudor siblings don't allow display casebacks.

[@PaublinoRamirez-iq6vj]

Man that Breitling timepiece is absolutely beautiful!!❤😊 (RUSH)

[@robertsullivan4773]

I so wanted this watch but its a big 42 and has an odd non Breitling movement so i pasted on it 😢

[@navidjoon1]

THIS is one beautiful and classy Breitling

[@craigriley9892]

I have big wrists. 42mm is not that big. However, 15mm+ is very thick. I bet it feels very topheavy on the wrist

[@alexf7377]

Me too. 40mm feels just a wee bit too small and 42mm just right. Anyway I think this one's well out of my price range.

[@JohnBuckmaster-sw3wm]

I own a Breitling that is 42 mm… Not quite as thick as this one, I have a 7 1/4 inch wrist and although it fits great and looks great, I think that’s pretty much the minimum size wrist for this watch.

[@cmb2669]

Dream watch

[@SRADracer]

Moon with a face, cut numbers. No for me.

[@davidthom7127]

It would probably be difficult to squash into a much smaller watch, and might be more difficult to read as easily

[@epbrown01]

The fault with a salmon-dialed beauty is the salmon dial.

[@angelic_og]

Dosnt have a Minute Repeater

[@TruckeeDoggo]

Two features it doesn’t have are originality (blatant Patek 5270 ripoff), and a reasonable size

[@mrsmith8224]

Just a bit thick