Is There Evidence for a Global Flood? | The Creation Podcast: Episode 15

What really happened during the Genesis Flood? Is there scientific evidence for a global Flood? And how does geology confirm the book of Genesis?
Host Trey Bowling examines the historical and scientific evidence with ICR Research Scientist and Geologist Dr. Tim Clarey in Episode 15 of The Creation Podcast.
Featured resource: Carved in Stone | Get the book here: store.icr.org/carved-in-stone...
#TheCreationPodcast #Geology #Science
---
Do you have questions about science or Scripture? Post them in the comments and we might answer them in future episodes.
Tune in every other Tuesday here on KZbin for new episodes. You can also find the audio version on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and Google Podcasts.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel to get notified about all of our upcoming episodes!
Hope to see you next time on The Creation Podcast!
---
Learn more about the Institute for Creation Research: www.icr.org/
Shop our store: www.icr.org/
Support our ministry: www.icr.org/donate
Plan your visit to our Dallas creation museum and planetarium: discoverycenter.icr.org/

[@johnmoore890]

Thanks ICR for all you do to spread God’s word. Keep it up on all platforms available.

[@theatre_pigs]

Where is this guy's research been published?

[@theovanrossum8652]

This is the question they never expected you to ask.

[@sliglusamelius8578]

Lol. A). Half of published research is thought to be wrong or faked. B). Nobody can publish anything that the reviewers believe violates their narratives. Gunter Bechly PhD was ostracized from his professional societies when he became an ID proponent. C). James Tour PhD says that he has colleagues who agree with him but they won’t state it publicly. D). Michael Behe PhD can’t buy a friend at Lehigh once he came out as an a dreaded ID proponent. E). Alternative publications exist for these kinds of ideas, some are in video format, many are in book format. A format is a format. Buy their books and write your refutation. Isaac Newton wrote a book; Darwin did too. Peer review is overrated and a broken system.

[@007gracie]

He used to work for Chevron before becoming a professor. Now works for Institute for Creation Research. Would need to dive into Michigan school time to find those papers

[@fred_derf]

Why did Chinese and other cultures that existed before the flood, during the flood and continued after the flood not notice that they were all killed in a year long flood?

[@cza7751]

No one survived the flood except Noah's family. People disbursed after Babel.

[@livingpicture]

@@cza7751 👍 For research into how Y-chromosome-based genetics confirms the Biblical time scale and traces all families back to Babel and subsequently to Noah's sons, look up Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson's book Traced. You can also find two video series (via Answers in Genesis) where he discusses this in detail. With apologies to ICR, but IMO, much of their research parallels your own, so I do consider both of you "allies" for truth.

[@koonta6079]

@@cza7751 So the Christian belief is that the people that formed at the Babel Tower were descendants of Noah as per your bible. These descendants of Noah obviously had skills (tool manufacturing and boat building being the main ones) If these descendants of Noah gathered at Babel and were given different languages and then sent off to populate the world. Explain to me why these skilled people reverted back to the stone age. The existence of modern times stone age races the Australian Aborigines, Papua New & Torres Strait Pacific tribes along with the tribes of South America once again proves that the bible is nothing but a storybook invented by the primitive minds of Middle Eastern goat herders and believed by fools.

[@alansegger6199]

Wow this man is the real deal all success for your book.

[@cza7751]

I think you ought to chop these podcasts/interviewers up into 5-8 minute segments along with publishing the entire interview. They make easy reference points for viewers who won't commit to a 30 min video. Thanks for all you do!

[@icrscience]

Thank you for the feedback and encouragement. We do what you're suggesting on our other social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn). But we'll let our team know to consider for KZbin as well. Here's a link to an example on Facebook: facebook.com/icrscience/videos/1013010006303251/

[@Faitheist1305]

I think you should chop them completely and stop spouting nonsense.

[@psalms1506]

I'm from an area 400-500m above sea level 60km from the nearest ocean yet there's sea shells inside the cliffs and rocks where I live.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Yep - the land you are on has seen significant uplift. The sea creatures you find (some of which will be extinct) were deposited when the land was under a shallow warm sea.

[@1414141x]

Sea levels rise and fall, So does the land you stand on. Although you don't see it move, unless its an earth quake or violent volcanic activity. So the sea shells you are finding are evidence that at one time the land they are in was a long time ago under sea water. When they died they were covered with sediments that covered them and then slowly they were fossilised due to pressure and time. Then the land they were in was lifted up above sea level, or the sea level dropped below the land. You are now seeing the exposure of this land and revealing the sea shells in them.

[@alantasman8273]

@@StudentDad-mc3pu No shallow warm sea creates the conditions for billions of fossils left in the fossil record. They were buried swiftly and with great pressure applied to them by the continuous building of layers of sediment deposited on top of them.

[@vikingskuld]

Lol wow that's all over the world you find those fossils even up to hundreds of feet down, but hey ok lie to yourself stop misinformation others.

[@kjejon1]

No

[@THUNDERFFF]

Weird…I’m from a country where we have historical artifact from 6 - 8 thousands years ago…. Didn’t know anything about this flood until some priest showed up and converted my great grand parents hahaa

[@JRTIGER07]

Thats awesome what the artifacts and how did they date them ?

[@stickyrubb]

'Converted', as in, 'Brainwashed'? Yeah

[@alantasman8273]

@@stickyrubb No, converted as in saved from eternal torment in hell.

[@stickyrubb]

@@alantasman8273 The idea that you're in contact with the creator of the universe is insane, and there is no evidence for this whatsoever.

[@alantasman8273]

@@stickyrubb Get up to date with what DNA is. There could be no DNA without a creator.

[@evanssooklal1620]

Excellent work, my brothers.

[@kathleennorton7913]

Thanks for letting there be comments!

[@user-gk6ge2jq9q]

Great video!

[@alantasman8273]

It would be interesting for Dr Clarey to take into consideration the Moon's tidal lock and its impact on global water flows at that time. Most certainly the they would have affected the tides and therefore water motion and sedimentary distribution around the globe.

[@gulzarkareem794]

It will depend upon future young generations to believe in what have had happened what might have happened what could have happened..

[@alansegger6199]

It takes about 20 years for the education system to catch up with latest research.

[@meertin298]

Folks, please watch creationists in actual debates with experts in the field. Those experts can and will demonstrate where the flaws in creationist arguments are. For example, look up the heat problem. There is simply no way the continents could have moved as much as they have in 6,000 years without generating enough heat to boil the world's oceans. Unless, of course, you invent another miracle. Just watch some debates. You won't be able to continue accepting the dishonesty here once you've seen countless people effortlessly deconstruct every single creationist claim in a way that laypeople like us can understand. Just try it.

[@vikingskuld]

Actually you need to listen to some modern day creationist talk. There is no heat problem for that. The math for that model is bad first off. Your explanation is to just dump massive amounts of heat out instantly. That's not how it works. The whole inside of the planet is a sun pretty much yet we don't have a heat problem. You have an education problem

[@darkfielddiggermicrosafari]

Good stuff., keep up the good work! May the LORD speed this knowledge far and wide unto the blessing of saved sinners.

[@livingpicture]

This is a great explanation of which sequence of rock layers corresponds to which time period in the flood. Thanks for interviewing Dr. Clarey!

[@icrscience]

Glad it was helpful!

[@tjsays8916]

Fact, of course. Won't it be amazing when God returns, rules the world and then explains all of these things to us?

[@stickyrubb]

I don't think he will, honestly. And I do think that the most important reason for him not coming back to Earth to explain all these things to us is that he doesn't fucking exist.

[@michaelmorris5755]

Thank you. The idea of geological changes occuring at very very high speed is revolutionary. And the himalayas sprouting from the earth in a few weeks.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Revolutionary and an absolute impossibility.

[@SLAYER97501]

​@@StudentDad-mc3pubecause hurricanes, landslides, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, meteorites, tsunamis, fires, etc never happen. Totally impossible. Landscapes don't ever change, and certainly never in even the course of a year.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

@@SLAYER97501 They absolutely do, in the course of a few hours sometimes. But not mountain ranges like the Himalayas.

[@adelinomorte7421]

michaelmorris5755 ***weeks or millions is that matter? those mountains will not go anymore or less than it should.***

[@vikingskuld]

​@@StudentDad-mc3pulol your showing your out dated education and your tipping into extreme ignorance. One of the layers they find Dino fossils in is stretched out over half the size of the north American continent. Secular papers proving articulated Dinosaurs fossils were drowned so flood deposited. All the pieces of Dino fossils they find are shown to be flood deposited. Same thing over half of Asia. Look at all the mammoths flash frozen in dozens of feet of ice. Soft tissue found in hundreds of fossils dating according to secular science from 65 to 500 million years Old. The protiens found in those soft tissue have been tested and lots of secular papers show they cannot lost more then a few thousand years. Your secular science can't explain soft tissue, c14 in Dino fossils, coal, and diamonds. Hel academics couldn't even get fossil and coal formation correct. Let alone how there made or the time it takes to make them right. So you actually are going to believe them when they say a flood didn't happen. When every day that goes by more proof a world wife flood happened. Hel every major ancient culture talks about it. I think it's 300 plus cultures world wide talk about an world flood. Pretty much most of them all having the main points the same. A world flood, God told a man to get ready, build a boat, collect animals. Seriously you need to look into it instead of believing what your told

[@SuperPhester]

Thank you.

[@deanweaver4469]

God has delivered many people,books,and science to me and it still amazes me that the flood is not accepted as a fact

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Why does that amaze you? It's a silly and impossible story.

[@DJH316007]

Because it's not fact. If you look into it and can't see how stupid it is you are a lost cause.

[@alantasman8273]

@@DJH316007 You are so correct about evolution being a lost cause.

[@christopherdunn8343]

And of course the story of Star Wars is also true.

[@stickyrubb]

Probably even has more evidence

[@theace8502]

Of course it is. It says in the very first words of the series that “A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away.” No “evolutionist” buffoon has any evidence to rebuke that, and we have a ton of evidence for it’s existence

[@finray2]

The fossil record is such a unique thing across the world that it screams flood to have created the layers and preserved so many specimens so well. Had to have been created by a unique event like the flood preserving plants and animals so quickly.

[@THUNDERFFF]

Where exactly did you discover that?

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Apart from the fact that specimens at the bottom are all extinct, despite being water dwelling - the fossil record absolutely screams evolution.

[@2l84me8]

That doesn’t make sense. Those rock layers are separated by millions of years between strata and a massive flood would have just jumbled everything together. Almost like there was no biblical flood at all.

[@vikingskuld]

​@@THUNDERFFFactually secular science papers show articulated Dinosaurs were drowned and they are found all over.

[@truthisbeautiful7492]

Exciting research! Get a rock collection and learn your rocks. It will be interesting when this work is completed and can be synthesized with geo physics models of tsunamis.

[@VisshanVis]

I have a question you claim that the flood lasted 371 days, after every thing being covered for water that long all plant life would be dead what did the animals eat there would have been no grasses , same with the meat eating animals after them being released out of the ark what did they eat did they catch and eat the other animals that were on the ark?? also how would they have been able to store enough fresh food for a whole year for all those animals on a boat, especially the meat eater any fresh meat would have spoiled after a few weeks and then gone rancid after 3 4 months.

[@markkell8376]

A few things worth mentioning are first, the flood had been receding since the 7th month. After 10 months the mountaintops were visible (which of course would vary in height, some not nearly as high as others). That leaves around 70 days or so for waters to recede further and grasses to begin to grow and plants to begin sprouting again. Then 40 days later, a month before they left the ark, he sent out a raven which could potentially live on any carrion. Shortly thereafter Noah sent out a dove to find evidence of greater plant life (at first coming back without evidence). A week later he did so again and it came back with a fresh olive leaf. It wasn't until a week after the dove returned with the olive leaf that they left the ark. Second, on the other topic of food, it is generally accepted that the ark didn't have nearly as many animals as a modern biologist would expect when we say "two of every kind" and "seven of every clean animal." Rather than species or even a genus of animals, Noah brought families of animals, a significantly smaller number. Also, prior to the flood, the world being a different place, biblically we have no scripture mentioning the eating of meat. Both Adam and the animals of the earth were promised the plants of the earth for food (Gen 1:29-30). Meat eating is not mentioned. After the flood, in an increasingly different world, Noah is specifically given permission to eat meat (Gen 9:3). So, with an entire earth and a limited number of animals the amount of food needed would be significantly reduced. With the seven of every clean animal, outlined later in Leviticus, it would even be possible for some animals to be eaten in those first months without destroying the species.

[@boxelder9167]

Sun dried fish are edible for cattle feed but it’s not recorded if Noah and his family used such methods to provide food for themselves or the animals while on their journey or afterwards. I have read about early ocean voyages catching and drying fish to feed the livestock in the cargo holds.

[@danishdebater5805]

@@markkell8376 well that is intresting. So 70 days to grow... What is the growth rate of an olive tree? What kind of soil does it grow in, dry or moist soil? How does it handle being submerged, or floating for an extended period of time? Just some curious first questions...

[@truthmatters82]

@@danishdebater5805 an olive seed takes about 40 days to germinate, also the Bible says that the dove brought back a leaf not an olive branch indicating it would be older than a sprout. God Bless🕊️

[@ojaiallen8004]

One Book, NOAH'S ARK: A FEASIBILITY STUDY by John Woodmorappe, answers scores of questions that you will never dream of thinking about. Get that book and you will receive answers to questions you cannot even think about.

[@RuthieBC]

Good video!

[@icrscience]

Thanks!

[@ZLCBluecod]

Has this research been independently verified by other scientists?

[@alantasman8273]

Dr. Clarey said that his peers have acknowledged that the data is good but they refuse to acknowledge his interpretation of the data. Dr. Clarey is following the science...his peers are following their deep time paradigm.

[@roblangsdorf8758]

Each mega-sequence seems to indicate a separate surge of water, rather than a steady increase in water levels. After each increase there seems to be a period where everything settles out before the next surge. What is the current thinking as to what caused the waters to increase in these surges, instead of one continuous rise that the current continental sprint model would seem to imply?

[@technicianbis5250]

The moon was still there and caused tidal surges on the Earth which had no impediment to slow or stop these surges as there were no continents or reefs that could impede the water.

[@matbroomfield]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@suechapel1443]

That is interesting that the highest mountain like Everest formed at the end of the flood because I wondered how those on the ark would have had enough oxygen at that height

[@kenlyneham4105]

That question is easy to answer. As the waters rose, so too did our atmosphere and so at the peak of the flood which was above the peak of Mt Everest, there was plenty of oxygen. Better questions would be; How did Noah save all the insects? Where did he keep them, along with all the spiders? How did an olive tree grow when surely they all died and rotted with about 8 kilometres of fresh water over them for the best part of a year. Olive trees cannot grow in soggy soil with areas of standing water.

[@theovanrossum8652]

Every scientist knows that mountains are never formed by any floods but by plate tectonics.

[@JustAnotherPerc]

@@theovanrossum8652 the land masses got messed up because of the flood, so they crashed together and made a mountain. Simple physics

[@JustAnotherPerc]

@@kenlyneham4105 seeds are a thing

[@technicianbis5250]

@@kenlyneham4105 A better way of finding the answers is to read the whole Bible, in Genesis God tells Noah to take the animals and also the food for them to eat including insects. Noah took plants with him as well eg olive trees, grape vines ect.

[@draven3838]

How to answer this, the church hired 2 different playwrights to translate the bible scrolls and they inturn interpreted it as they saw it,

[@alanburton6368]

Floods can occur beneath ice sheets

[@sagethegreat4680]

You talk about rocks showing signs of a flood great but where is all the water . Water that raised that high would pretty much have no where to recede too . Also mathematically if you use the highest ever recorded rainfall it would take multiple years of straight rain for it to cover planet not just one . Not too mention it took Magellan 1 year , multiple ships and hundreds of people sail the planet and he didn't have to stop everywhere and collect animals. ( Noah also only had about 20 people ) from start to finish the flood would have minimally have taken decades not years . Also kind of realize the world as known at the time didn't include the America's or Australia. Rocks showing signs of water erosion is interesting but far from proof of a global flood and really just shows water touched it at some point doesn't even mean it was the same event . Also let's realize it is God we are talking about, look what he supposedly did to Sodom and Gomorrah pretty much vaporized cities and just told who he didn't want involved to leave those cities . Would have been way easier for him to just repeat that instead of a flood that would decimate the fragile eco system.

[@finray2]

Not sure you watched the video by the details in your comment. You are talking the amount of rain to cover the earth...the rain is not what caused the flood. This video is discussing the catastrophic plate tectonic model for the flood. Just does not sound like you watched the video.

[@JustAnotherPerc]

Everyone but the David family was sinning against the lord, so he couldn't just tell them to watch out

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

@@finray2 The Bible does not mention earthquakes anywhere in the flood narrative - plates moving even a few centimetres cause massive quakes - this idea is absolute bunkem.

[@finray2]

@@StudentDad-mc3pu the waters from deep coming up like geysers is mentioned and that would seem to indicate movement of the earth. I don't think you can just assume there were no earthquakes just because that specific word was not used.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

@@finray2 You can't assume there were, but we can be sure that there was no continental movement or mountain formation, because we know how both of them work and it's not flooding.

[@scotthemphill6257]

Great information, though difficult to visualize how these different sequences occurred over time (flood year) around the globe. Does ICR plan to create a video (CGI) demonstration of these sequences (sped-up for flood year) around the globe?

[@icrscience]

We do have an exhibit at our Discovery Center that covers this. We'll look into making something similar available publicly. Thank you for your support!

[@technicianbis5250]

The moon was still there and caused tidal surges on the Earth which had no impediment to slow or stop these surges as there were no continents or reefs that could impede the water.

[@dongee1664]

Nobody seems to mention what a heinous deed that killing everything in the world was. I'll assume that you're all happy with that. Yet more excruciating embarrassment.

[@vikingskuld]

Nope who are you to judge God the times or the people??? Where you there or do you just regularly think you know more then God? He would you make my toilet water turn to wine so my pets can get drunk? Oh wait you don't do miracles or common sense????,Yeah I think your just showing your lack of understanding and complete ignorance on the subject, but hey keep on talking if you want it gives me something to laugh at lol thanks

[@dongee1664]

@vikingskuld absolutely Mr Viking. I think it was wonderful the way God is portrayed as choosing a people, then helping them to kill everyone on their journey to take a land that they coveted. I think it's great the way God allows slavery and allows rapists to marry their victims and encourages parents to stone unruly children to death. Most of all, I am fascinated by how religious belief leads to an unfortunate mental condition.

[@lauraschroeder8177]

Day 150 Flood peaked.

[@HappyBoyProductions]

Fantastic video..

[@Seticzech]

Answer is: no.

[@1414141x]

Where are the best places to see evidence of the global flood please ? I would love to visit one of the sites.

[@DJH316007]

Nowhere.

[@oldtimerlee8820]

Grand Canyon in the US is the best place to start. For more information check out the Answers in Genesis article titled "Startling Evidence for Noah’s Flood".

[@DJH316007]

@@oldtimerlee8820 It's not evidence. Do some research on how it's debunked.

[@oldtimerlee8820]

@@DJH316007 I used to be a theistic evolutionist. Grew tired of being lied to, in the name of science. I have done much research, in an effort to defend my position of "millions of years". Much of which has actually been debunked. Far to many speculation, assumptions, perhaps, maybe, could have been along with a number of outright frauds that I once believed to be true.

[@user-ik4fd9ny4b]

@@DJH316007 I am guessing you're not a happy person. I'll also go out own a limb and say that you go to all of this type of sites to dispute all.

[@DomoZorroOorroZomoD]

The rocks say flood, epoc eclipt..

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

It's absolutely a fiction. Big floods may have happened, especially at the end of the last ice age. But Noahs flood is impossible for thousands of reasons. Kangaroos, for instance.

[@stickyrubb]

It's astonishing to see people in this day and age believing in this *ridiculous* myth. I can't believe it.

[@oldtimerlee8820]

The answer to your kangaroo example are land bridges during the ice age. As the ice melted, afterwards, it returned to the sea, increasing sea level. There are enough land bridges, that during that time, man and beast spread to all habitable lands. The bridge between Russia and Alaska was the path taken by oeopkles who became "native" North and South Americans. Same premise for the South Pacific lands.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

@@oldtimerlee8820 There are no land bridges to Australia, not even during the ice age which finished around 10,000 years ago.

[@oldtimerlee8820]

@@StudentDad-mc3pu You don't know what existed, as you weren't there to witness the event. You don't have a record of the tithonic movement that was (is) still underway. Nor do you know the island heights and water depths, when the ice was at its maximum. You don't know how long the floating plant mats, existed after the flood, either. Take a look at Spirit Lake, today, after Mt St Helens. Even secular scientists believe plant mats are one of the ways animal kinds (Family/Genus) migrated.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

@@oldtimerlee8820 This fallacious argument about requiring people to have 'been there' is just silly. We use evidence to draw conclusions about things we can't directly observe. You have not offered any evidence at all for a single one of your claims. The distance between Australia and other land masses is, at it's minimum, hundreds of miles. This is a rediculous and desperate argument. In addition it does not explain how kangaroos would have made to TOO the Ark or why they would have journeys 3500 miles to do, and then returned. Both journeys would have required several generations of animals. The flood is a myth.

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

FACTS!

[@fioschannel]

Thank you for this very instructive podcast. I'm following you from Switzerland.

[@icrscience]

Thanks for watching!

[@AlexGomez-dy1jc]

Theres more water then land on earth

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Yep - but not enough water to even reach my house.

[@adelinomorte7421]

***I can not believe in evidences from all that I read , see in TV or online, what I see or gather is not the same as you and for that matter anyother to understand. We have to be tuned to the message in order to understand, even so it will never be the same, if you do not believe it I waisted my time with you as you waist your time with all you say.***

[@theovanrossum8652]

There are two very important questions to ask that immediately debunk any worldwide flood: 1, Where did all the water come from? 2. Where did it disappear to?

[@WingDiamond]

The answer is ... "Magic"! No wait, that's when "Da Deh-Vul" does something - when "Gawd" does something it's a "Miracle".

[@Sawyersmaple]

If you fill in the ocean trenches and level off the mountain ranges on the continents, you have more than enough water to flood the whole earth.

[@Sawyersmaple]

About 70% of the earths surface is currently covered by water.

[@JRTIGER07]

@@Sawyersmaple *GENESIS 7:11* All the Springs of the Great deep burst forward and the floodgate of Heaven were open for 40 Days & 40 nights .... *GENESIS 1:6-10* Before the Flood the earth surface was 80% and 20% water ...the land broke up into many continents and little islands so the water is still here 30% land 70% water

[@prorocanstva3249]

Great video! Thanks a lot. Can you tell what music are you using in this video? God bless!

[@icrscience]

Hello! Glad you enjoyed the podcast. The intro and outro music is an original piece written in-house.

[@aubreyleonae4108]

How did they protect themselves from methane poisoning?

[@LuciferAlmighty]

100% fiction

[@ChloeTrevor]

Woooo!!! Great job, Trey! Loved the video! Can't wait for more! :D

[@stephenland9361]

"Is There Evidence for a Global Flood?" There's all kinds of evidence. The question is, is this good evidence, much less compelling evidence? The answer is no.

[@frosty_soda]

Oh, right, that's that settled then. Yep... the evidence for a global flood is such that you'd have to be willfully ignorant of it

[@Ack5100]

Everyone is looking at the same evidence though...

[@skindred1888]

@@frosty_soda I'd go check the scientific consensus on that

[@BibleResearchTools]

Sean Rooney wrote, "I'd go check the scientific consensus on that" Consensus is not science, but politics. It is typically invoked when the data is not strong enough to support a hypothesis. Dan

[@perly6347]

@@BibleResearchTools Im gonna go ahead and assume you have no background in science whatsoever. The statement you just made is entirely incorrect

[@worldgonemad5866]

Nope...that was quick.

[@erniedanzig]

Note how many times Dr. Clarey says “kinda” preceding his statements. He knows the Biblical folk stories are dubious.

[@TheJiminiflix]

Thats rude. Maybe you believe a comet created all the billions of fossils over the earth...thats your choice.

[@ojaiallen8004]

When he uses "Kinda", that has nothing to do with him being a Biblical Creationist or the evidence he is discussing. That is his idiosyncratic linguistic style..."kinda like" would be similar to another person saying "it is as if" or some other style.

[@daniellineberry8879]

You should sue your brain for nonsupport!

[@theovanrossum8652]

@@TheJiminiflix _"Maybe you believe a comet created all the billions of fossils over the earth"_ How rude

[@allieoop2908]

Interesting to know if you've read the bible and which of the text you struggle with

[@howardloewen1834]

"For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth...and rested the seventh-day" Exodus 20:11. The "seventh-day" is the day we commonly call Saturday.

[@gnusndn301]

Thanks man appreciate all that discussion. I've been a follower of icr since many years ago back in the '80s sometime. I appreciate all the work that you scientist down there are doing and demonstrating that the Bible is true. I remember hearing a tape way back in the '60s sometime, Henry Morris and him talking about all of these things. As you can see, I've been following the evolution - creation debate for a long time. God bless icr and all organizations that are carrying the ball for the truth of the Gospel. Thanks again.

[@a.r.r.5626]

Excellent....very interesting and informative.

[@Faitheist1305]

After watching this utter nonsense in its entirety, it pains me to realise that in 21st century there are actually people who not only believe but actively promote it as reality to children. This is little more than child abuse and should be combatted at every opportunity.

[@WingDiamond]

👏👍🏻

[@alanpfeiffer9686]

just like the promotion of the fairytale of the big bang .

[@leeuwbama9433]

If you think teaching creationism to children is childabuse, can you tell me what your standpoint is on surgical genderreassignment before they reach the age of maturity?

[@pythondrink]

@@leeuwbama9433 nice straw man. Making assumptions huh?

[@JRTIGER07]

Hungry bro 🤔 🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🐵🐒🦍

[@philipsteele8407]

A fascinating insight into how science actually supports the flood account. Thank you.

[@AlanLow]

Could you please point out the Peer-reviewed science you see there? I must have missed it.

[@daniellineberry8879]

@@AlanLow Could you please present evidence for evolution, oh hold on I can , . There is it is all the evidence of evolution!

[@theovanrossum8652]

@@daniellineberry8879 Why suddenly change the subject? Is there peer reviewed evidence for the flood or not?

[@theace8502]

⁠@@daniellineberry8879There’s actually an incredible preponderance of evidence that people like you and who run this channel will hear about and be corrected for over and over again, but yet will continue to spout the same lies and nonsense. I do love it though when religious fundamentalists project onto those who don’t hold their same views, like saying evolution is our religion or that we believe we came from mud or rocks (which isn’t even evolution anyway). Same can be said for your erroneous belief that there is no evidence for evolution, because in actuality it’s the flood myth that has no, and I mean NO, evidence in support of it whatsoever. Also, as usual, religious fundamentalists can’t answer a simple question, and so they must change the conversation to something else because that’s all they’ve been taught how to do from quacks like the people who run this channel

[@anarchagustus5046]

i applaud you for your work sirs god bless y'all

[@williamhoward2731]

I wish to thank you for sharing this awesome Christian Information Podcast 15 with me . Amen

[@JungleJargon]

The increased rate of time in outer space eliminates the need for dark matter. The increased measure of distance (expansion) in outer space eliminates the need for dark energy. These relativistic effects from having less mass and less gravity in the vicinity in outer space also mean that the earth and universe are younger where we are inside of our galaxy and the universe is older in outer space where there is no matter and much less gravity. 😀

[@livingpicture]

So you're speaking about the time dilation/expansion effect (I might be screwing up the name of it) presented by Dr. Faulkner, right? Question: what do you do with the Red Shift? I don't recall Faulkner dealing with this in what I've seen in his presentations on expansion affecting time.

[@matbroomfield]

Time does not pass faster in outer space.

[@skepticsinister]

Pure crap.

[@JungleJargon]

@@matbroomfield There is no need to modify gravity. Less gravity accelerates time and inflates distance both of which accelerate causation making everything happen faster including lightspeed while maintaining the speed of light 186,000 miles per second. The concept is so simple at least for mechanically minded people. If you change the size of a cubit, you will change the size of the house that you build with it. If instead of driving 60 kilometers an hour you drive 60 miles an hour, you will obviously increase your speed because you increased the distance that you traveled in an hour. Then if you change from 60 miles an hour to 60 miles in half an hour, you will obviously increased your speed again because you traveled 60 miles in less time. General relativity is no longer just a theory, it is an observation. Distance expands with less gravity and time speeds up with less gravity effectively making everything faster including light without breaking the speed of light. A deeper understanding of gravity gives you a deeper understanding of the universe. Our observation of the earth is flat locally the same as our observation of the speed of light is the same locally but not on a larger scale. The earth is round on larger scales and the speed of light depends on the measures of time and distance which change depending on the amount of gravity in the surrounding area. This means that distant starlight arrives instantaneously from distant galaxies which aren’t as far away as they appear to us to be with our measures of time and distance and the time is also passing by at a much faster rate since there’s no matter between us and distant galaxies to slow down time or shorten distance according to general relativity which is now an observation and not just a theory. …and the converse of things approaching a black hole look stopped to us because of how slow they are moving. The changes in time and distance compound the changes in the speed of light as observed from our frame of reference. *Do a thought experiment.* Hold your hands a foot apart representing 186,000 miles saying “one thousand and one” representing one second while pretending to see an imaginary photon going from one hand to the other. Now expand the distance saying “one thousand and one” as fast as you can. You should notice that the speed of the imaginary photon increases the more distance expands and the more time speeds up just same as the farther away from the center of the galaxy it is. The opposite is also true. Someone moving in the direction of a black hole will seem to us to be stopped. *If you change the size of a cubit you will change the size of the house that you build with it.*

[@JungleJargon]

@@livingpicture Redshift happens when light leaves a galaxy. Blueshift happens as light enters a galaxy. The more distant a galaxy is the more accumulated gravity there is caused redshift.

[@PearlmanYeC]

Nice interview. We have 365 days on the ark unless we boarded day/s, prior to the start of the 40 days of rain. As 12 lunar months + 10 days = 365. ref. Pearlman YeC

[@marciamcgrail5889]

Another great, informative video - reminds me of 'The Genesis Flood' book by Dr H.Morris and Dr J. Whitcomb...scientific authority and Biblical clarity. Wonderful!

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

Fact, of course. There is nothing in scripture that has not happened because all things are possible with God.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

Except almost all of Genesis, which is a myth with no evidence.

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@StudentDad-mc3pu 😂 you're funny, man.

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@StudentDad-mc3pu God was there. I think He knows a little bit more than you do.

[@stickyrubb]

@@RobertA-oi6hw Do you.... do you actually not see the glaring logical error in your statement? "God is real because god said so". Are you...... serious?

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@stickyrubb God is real because his Spirit dwells in me. Therefore it is easy to believe when He says He is real. Get it now?

[@wealthyking3189]

Jesus is Lord