Is There EVIDENCE for Intelligent Design? Luke Barnes and Jay Richards

[@DrBrianKeating]

Is the universe designed?

[@frosted1030]

LOL Amazing.. a simple science lesson and you took it out of context and missed the point entirely. LOL

[@derekallen4568]

No!

[@derekallen4568]

If a god exists, the universe could exist any which way but loose.

[@derekallen4568]

We live in a time that allows complex life to exist. In the past, it didn't allow complex life to exist. Only bacterial and archaea. In the future complex life won't be able to exist. Fine tuned? The amount of time that we have on this earth is limited to a tiny fraction.

[@PrivateSi]

Doesn't look that way, but I am very biased against all forms of Intelligent Design, imaginary and real, except that which definitely naturally happens. I am a Denis Noble + friends fan so basically believe complex life = colonies of cooperating (micro!) farmers/scientists that employ artificial selection and directed, constrained rapid natural selection experimentation at many levels. Obviously the immune system is a high level complex example but it's also evident in simple life and cells themselves.. -- But no god, no creator of the universe, just a load of +ve and -ve particles joined as neutral Field Cells, each bonded to 12 others (no religious pun intended, it's just close-packed sphere geometry) that can be semi-split (polarised) in a direction, like a magnetic field vector, or fully split to form matter and antimatter bits (though I don't believe in Quarks). It's a crystal ball universe.

[@IntuitiveIQ]

Another wonderful conversation. Love Peter Robinson. He was an important voice during Covid. Thanks for sharing, doc. And yes, I’m on your mailing list. 😊

[@DrBrianKeating]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@boohoo5419]

intuitiveIQ says it all lol.. no realIQ, its just intuitive. ahahah! thats so dumb. every half intelligent person would immediately realize how stupid this whole channel is! but not you i guess. with your intuitiveIQ.

[@Age_of_Apocalypse]

Great, great discussion between civilized intelligent men! 👍👍👏 Dr. Keating, great answer to the question of our so-called "insignificance" in the universe at the end of the video (starting at 1:03:07). No, we're not insignificant! 😊

[@AlfredoRicoX]

I like Dr. Keating's comment about slavery and lukemia. "At what point do those have to be encoded in the initial conditions."

[@v2ike6udik]

when goblinement stops inserting them

[@McShrimpies]

Fine tuning has always make more sense to me as the result of a selection process. The same way life appearing fine tuned is evidence of a biological selection process. Blackholes would be the source of a universal selection process in this scenario.

[@dougg1075]

James Tour would’ve been an excellent guest on this one as well. I know he was on another one, but this one also would have been great.

[@economicfreedom8591]

>>>James Tour would’ve been an excellent guest on this one Along with Stephen C. Meyer.

[@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke]

Why would a biologist have expertise in fundamental physics?

[@bokchoiman]

Seeing as we have no evidence of multiple universes, isn't it premature to assume that there are ones that have different constants?

[@sonarbangla8711]

I wonder how many dials did this guy turned and what differences did he observed?

[@fc-qr1cy]

Ive been watching your videos for months Dr. Keating and have never sub (im confused also) but there is Science behind it. however thanks to Science and Algo ive been able to watch. FINALLY SUBSCRIBED LOL. CHEERS

[@DrBrianKeating]

Perfect welcome to our Universe

[@edblair1]

Keating is good. He can deconstruct and debunk any theory if he chooses.

[@wulphstein]

Now you're doing something right!!!!!!

[@Wonderwhoopin]

Brian is the kinda of guy that hands you your ass in debates 😂they can’t run with him

[@boohoo5419]

did you finish middle school? did you ever read a book thats not self help? wtf are you talking about? this is really dumb shit.

[@paulkirby2761]

@@Wonderwhoopin Unless Eric Weinstein turns up and then Brian melts.

[@michellefranklin3182]

Hot Iron Core!!! What about Fred Hoyle?

[@helicalactual]

How long did it take for the wave function of the universe to collapse?

[@helicalactual]

Would the post 300,000 year plasma soup be acceptable to everyone?

[@alex79suited]

I like how they correlate computer syms to real life. Very nice lol. Peace ✌️ 😎. The universe in an opinion is everything he said and more.

[@gawayne1374]

It's not the universe that is fine tuned, it's our math.

[@Lobexx]

Elaborate

[@gawayne1374]

​@@Lobexx Math allows us to model the universe according to a self-consistent logical structure. It is a powerful tool and it allows us to predict with some degree of accuracy how the universe will behave under a set of predefined conditions. However, no matter how good a model of the universe is, it will never be the universe itself. Thus, to make our mathematics work, we need to add constants that tune our model to best fit the reality we observe. Because math has been so successful as a tool, we tend to believe that this represents and underlying truth about the universe itself, so when we need a constant added to an equation we asume it is also part of this underlying truth. I argue that the opposite is true. Its not that constants keep popping up to show us how carefully the universe has been designed, but rather how carefully we must tweak our mathematical models to fit reality more accurately, because math is just not good enough on its own.

[@jackripper5270]

Math aside.... The universe is fine tuned .... Gravity... Strong/weak nuclear force... Electro magnetism etc ... The laws of the universe are stable and predictable.... Even if you don't do the math ... It's still there ... And it's stable ... And it's fine tuned. If life was so easy to create, that it just happens on accident? Why don't we see life on the moon? ... Floating threw the void, etc .. billions of yrs... That's plenty of time ... And time makes anything possible... That's not what we observe.... Earth is busting with life .. from the bottom of the ocean, to the highest Mt... And diverse life!!! (Living and extinct) And all life has purpose.... Our math didn't create this oasis of life ... This oasis of life (allowed us) create math

[@christopherteale3389]

@@jackripper5270 Fine tuning is a mathematical argument. It draws the conclusion, from extremely sensitive constants in models of the universe, that any other configuration of those constants would result in the utter failure of life in the universe. You can't claim that there is fine tuning if you don't start with a model of the universe that is mathematically defined. The problem of observing life anywhere else is entirely different to the problem of fine tuning. You can't state that the universe is fine tuned from a local observation. Have you verified that there is no life anywhere else in the galaxy? Much less the entire universe? No, because we don't have the capability to make such observations. Why hasn't it happened anywhere else in the solar system? We don't even know if that is true yet, but if it hasn't then you need to consider the possibility that it is just very very hard for life to start without a precursor, but once it starts it adapts with great effectiveness to a variety of environments. Finally, there are living organisms on the moon. Look up tardigrades :P

[@v2ike6udik]

@@jackripper5270 you are insane. it´s not fine tuned, all those "constants" are NATURAL OUTCOMES. As we live in devils realm, scientist explain everything vice versa, fooling laymen left and right. Imagine someone saying that Pi is fine tuned. There is only on constant. IT IS ONE. Everything else comes from ONE. "Gravity... Strong/weak nuclear force... Electro magnetism etc ..." all those are exactly the same process just in different octaves. It is not fine tuning, it is a tower process of symmetries that is THE CLOCK. Everything else is satanistic scientists selling their bs.

[@neurolancer81]

“Accumulative case argument” is just another way of saying lots of gadbage = evidence. This is a theological argument.

[@artax7664]

What the heck is gadbage? The accumulative case strengthens the already compelling evidences. It brings them together making them stronger still. Accumulative evidence is the backbone of any theory.

[@neurolancer81]

@@artax7664 It is clear I meant garbage. In this case, the cumulative argument for fine tuning is a bunch of arguments from ignorance and incredulity and a cumulative case made by these arguments does not lead to evidence.

[@artax7664]

@@neurolancer81 🤦🏻 I can’t even spell gadbage without autocorrect harassing me. The fine tuning argument is not an argument from ignorance lol. It’s literally the opposite. The accumulative evidence strengthens the case. It’s not just that one of these constants are fine tuned, it’s that all of them are. This serves as powerful evidence of design. It’s not “therefore God”. It’s “therefore God remains a glaringly strong possibility”

[@artax7664]

@@davidf5609 That’s assuming that “more life” was God’s intent. That also assumes that it could have been tuned to have more life. Life permitting is not the same as life giving. *That is an argument from ignorance.

[@neurolancer81]

@@artax7664 You are making a case from incredulity. You claim that the constants are tuned. How do you know that constants can have a different value? Have you demonstrated that? Fine tuning is just a dressed up version of the Teleological argument which is based on incredulity and nothing else.

[@DrDeuteron]

OK, at 4:00 he blows off the weak interaction with a "who cares". Yes, the weak interaction is weak, and perhaps bizarre--but it dictates life by breaking all our cherished symmetries. It violates CP (but not enough to make a matter universe, that's to be solved). It also violates flavor conservation (CKM matrix). Without that: s,c,t,b quarks would be stable: nuclear physics would be a mess, there would be strange-deuterium with a (p, lambda) nucleus (and more). It drives muon decay, w/o which the periodic table would have an electron sheet, a muon sheet, and all combination in-between--chemistry would be a mess. In its current form, it sets the rate for the pp-chain, giving us a stable sun, where a core proton has a residence time of billions of years. It allows the sun to radiate away electron number via neutrinos, which is required to turn 10^54 protons and electrons into 5x10^53 protons, neutrons and electrons. The Bjorken Sum Rule tells us it links neutron decay to quark structure (idk how that works)--but that broken n-p symmetry drives nuclear structure. E.g, the famous triple-alpha-process, where the nuclear levels appear finely tuned to make both carbon and oxygen in the amounts the planets need to make life. The weak interaction also drives core collapse supernovae and neutron star formation, where we get our heavy elements; moreover, recent supercomputer modeling of supernova show that extreme non-linear R-process driven by neutrino-oscillation in dense media lead to asymmetric explosion/distribution of heavy elements. iirc, I read somewhere that our primordial cloud was rich in certain heavy elements required for life that would not be expected from uniform explosions, but this is an active area of research--so it's not just the shape of the solar system, but also the elemental content from which is was formed. I've also read that the neutrino pulse, via W exchange, accelerates the surrounding electron plasma to semi-relativistic speeds, so you can even have expanding clouds for further star-system formation. It's all very cool.

[@Thomas-gk42]

It´s very cool, yes, but fine-tuned? You can say this to every not statistically comparable constallation, whithout any gain of knowledge. Now that other guy even comes up with a kinda planetary fine-tuning, which indeed is statisitically comparable, since astronomers discovered some thousand exoplanets meanwhile. Though totally falsified he writes a book about it and hopes for readers. Of course he will find a bunch of simpletons.

[@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke]

I hope they address that God is just as finely tuned as the universe. If God were even slightly different he wouldn’t have wanted to create the universe exactly like this.

[@ricksmith1382]

Tornadoes, Hurricanes, Tsunamis, birth defects, etc. Intelligent design? My ass. I'd hire a 5 year old to better than that.

[@jorgen7180]

​​ @ricksmith1382 what would the the purpose of a world without those? We come here to learn, there is no learning without difficulties. Is understandable you need a 5 years old to explain it to you.

[@MS-ho9wq]

The theist may simply counter that the one god transcends the universe (transcends existence itself, perhaps?) and is not subject to such constraints. It's a meaningless argument. Or rather, it's no argument at all. Trying to find logical flaws in it is a waste of time.

[@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke]

@@jorgen7180 Are you saying there are natural disasters is heaven? Or are you saying life in heaven has no purpose?

[@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke]

@@MS-ho9wq If that’s a valid response to a fine tuning argument, I’ll give it to the original version that argues for God existing. The universe is not subject to such constraints. So the universe doesn’t need to be designed.

[@Wonderwhoopin]

22:58 guy asked him a question and paused then as bri guy started to answer he interrupted him to say the dr wasn’t letting him finish a sentence 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 smite em

[@ikeax4892]

[@advaitrahasya]

The human sinuses, the anterior cruciate ligament, never mind waste pipelines running right through recreational areas… Maybe a not too bright designer 😂

[@Yossarian.]

@@advaitrahasya More than that. What would possess any being who doesn't need to poop that the poop system is the way to go!? How does a god even imagine something like that?

[@Yossarian.]

@advaitrahasya Let's not forget the vital oxygen intake hole, roughly the size of a grape, position right next to the food intake hole where food like, oh I don't know, a grape, might inconveniently get wedge, causing a relatively slow and terrifying d3ath for the victim. ...yep. Great design that one God.👍 Truly inspired.👏

[@v2ike6udik]

maybe your brain is broken. what do you want, a teleport system, or kneedicks? ffs. "waste pipelines running right through recreational areas" no one asks to fk in the äss, and pee is nice, flushes away that rotting sperm.

[@v2ike6udik]

@@Yossarian. "might" but hardly does. unless gluttony is involved. aint that great design? :D

[@v2ike6udik]

@@Yossarian. aah, btw, who says satan is not god and terrifing death isnt his main goal.

[@donaldcameron9321]

First Principles RMCM : 1 … We sacrifice the complete truth of any given Experience for the Value to which we are Constrained. First Principles RMCM : 2 … To be infinitely Complex is to be infinitely Simple. First Principles RMCM : 3 … God is the infinitely Complex. ------ Homosapiens are the most complex entities in the known universe as we were grown in his image as was the universe, his garden profound.

[@paul8802]

It doesnt matter how obvious something is ,viz design, those who dont like where the inferences are going will always choose to remain in denial and play devils advocate although they won't admit it.

[@alschneider5420]

@rashadabdulazeem5387 You are so mistaken. You say I, "... have not been thankful ..." for my life. I have had a life full of research and fun studying and it will continue. I have a BS in physics, I was a carpenter, I got a black belt in Tae Kwon Do, I am internationally known in the magic industry, I have skied at most places out west, Master with two handed sword, learned about quantum mechanics and the internal structure the universe, studied several world religions, computer expert working at several companies during my life, drove Jaguars and lived in the finest apartments in the world, and it goes on. And I found reincarnation and learned many of my past lives and know I will live on. I am thankful I do not depend on an imaginary god that would make me fear I only have one life. You are stuck knowing little of life and believe you must bow down to an imaginary overload. I feel sorry for you.

[@sergeynovikov9424]

why are you avoiding in this very interesting conversation to speak about what life is from the point of physics in the first turn? definition of life is the main problem for physics to start with, imo.

[@michaeld9379]

Interviewer needs to stop interrupting

[@keatingclips]

wow

[@ORFirefighter]

Hello hi

[@sonarbangla8711]

Before asking is there evidence of intelligent design, Keating need to decide what kind of design created him, would it be spooky design or irrelevant design or what? He is a physicist, he should know. If it is that he doesn't know, then that will be testament to the downfall of physics. We may be in the twilight design. There is a conscious attempt to distort reality.

[@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke]

That begs the question, maybe no kind of design created him.

[@sonarbangla8711]

@@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke He may have dropped from the sky.

[@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke]

@@sonarbangla8711 Or been born after two organisms mated, like normal.

[@sonarbangla8711]

@@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke Like cow or human?

[@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke]

@@sonarbangla8711 exactly

[@theomnisthour6400]

The so-called "Big Bang" is nothing more than an artifact of a series of simulations stuck at a certain extent of space-time in the co-created simulation multiverse. It basically reflects a point at which it became clear that entropy was not the ultimate adversary, but rather cultural entropy - the players in the simulation getting bored and jaded and either playing destructively, corruptly (cheating less experienced and clever players), and/or just refusing to play the game. Ultimately, creation is only a success if all consciousness quanta have the opportunity to find their "place just right" that fits their emergent personality, talents, and shortcomings in an environment where they feel loved and empowered in the directions they choose to grow in. The recent observations from the JWST are a reflection of the fact that we are instantiating a new version of physical space-time that has a more expansive center than any before, showing us a universe that appears to defy all previous notions of the limits of this universe. As we proceed into the linear future, we will discover that there is no "beginning" or "end" to time, or limit on the new galaxies and worlds we can come to colonize and explore. That's what humanity was created to do as the final chosen species of the Gaia experiment, the perfect crash test dummies to fine tune the laws of reincarnation and Karma, and anchor the "perfect" center of all space-time in an updated highest heaven of God and the Divine Council - the senior creators of the multiverse - based on the childhood environment that raised the God Messiah that woke up to full knowledge of God's plan - a new and improved version of God Himself. That's what will be wrapping up in 2025, and why UAP disclosure won't wait, and all the hidden Satanic minions are suddenly being exposed and deposed.

[@dahveed72]

Get help

[@danielkanewske8473]

Logical fallacies be damned, the universe is fine tuned! Band wagon, for 60 years there has always been the notion of a set of underlying parameters governing properties the known universe and which are ,in theory, variable or randomly selected. Either/or fallacy, either it's this set of parameters or it's that set of parameter, when the correct answer is far more complicated. Faulty causality, since we don't know how or why the universe exists as it does, then it must be fine tuned which implies a fine tuner for which there is also no evidence. Etc ...

[@MS-od7je]

There ain’t no there there: time north of the equator.

[@v2ike6udik]

Luke: "we are made out of physical things". But there are NO things. Ffs. Are waves things? Waves are hysteresis processes. Fknsht. :D

[@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke]

Does ‘thing’ have a specific meaning in science?

[@v2ike6udik]

@@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke idk, luke, I refuse to call waves a thing. Just alone the word "particle" not only brainwashed many generations of ppl, but also scientists. Im talking seriously :) but the mere notion of "particle" has destroyed ppls minds. I have to do hypnotic reverse psychology . i have to ask reverse mocking questions back to their stupid mocking attempts. Until the finally ungot it. "you broke me, i dont 'know nothing." Wokeness broke and redefined the language to accommodate delusional narcissists minds, but physicists did it before. :D Both were deliberately done by k1llumi1nati, your ppl. There. :D

[@msnttnny8083]

a lot of doctors here ... and NO goodvac cine

[@dougg1075]

God created this. Don’t blow it now, he’s close. “ lean not to your understanding but in all things faith”

[@volaireoh883]

Infinite regression.

[@oskarskalski2982]

Which god? Zeus, Odin, Shiwa? There are so many of them.

[@Paine137]

I’m sure the Taliban agree.

[@toddciotti3324]

The fishes example is wrong because fish don’t talk. Speaking is what makes us in the image of God

[@Paine137]

Allah is so proud of you. Oh, wrong one?

[@jeromyseal4179]

Whales and dolphins are shown to have a language. Does that mean that they too were made in the image of god?

[@SuatUstel]

Also murdering torturing raping stealing renders us in the image if God. Don't forget he decreed genocide*cananaites amalakites etc

[@jackripper5270]

Speaking isn't an "image" ... I believe in creation!! Don't get me wrong.... 1. The laws of the universe are stable and predictable... 2. All life has purpose.... 3. The universe shows EVIDENCE of intelligent design... All point to a creator... And it doesn't even take much faith... Imo But, I do struggle with religion....

[@artax7664]

@@jackripper5270 don’t worry about religion. Just read the Bible. You can read the other “holy” books as well if you want, but read the Bible. It’s very different from any other holy book. Most are mythical, some are just a book of rules, the Bible is a collection of historical documents. It’s falsifiable.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Thank you for attending

[@PrivateSi]

If you believe there's something physically deeper and SIMPLER going on, and not all 'Constants' are even constant in time and space, the Fine Tuning arguments don't convince at all.. Simulation theory has the same problem as God - you need a far more complex, evolved lifeform, not in this universe to create and MAINTAIN our universe... -- Sure, time could vary hugely and we'd never know - but that's the problem, we can never know if we're in a simulation. Arguments such as 'compression algorithms' or 'imaginary numbers' appearing in nature are just because they're NATURAL solutions to problems. Maths notation may be artificial but maths is natural. -- HOWEVER! Complex life is intelligently designed..... by itself from the bottom up, with Natural Selection being the SECONDARY driving force over bottom-up artificial selection and symbiosis, with life also using intelligently constrained, semi-directed natural selection experiments too.

[@oaksnice]

How do you define intelligence in that process?

[@PrivateSi]

@@oaksnice .. Decision making based on (at least temporarily) stored and processed information, innate or learned. TBH I put Natural Selection equal with all the other factors combined, 50/50 split.. There is individual cell intelligence and emergent group intelligence via intra and inter cell comms. They are complex organisms themselves that make up more complex organisms. There is a lot of intelligence stored in the cell, lots of information transfer (electro(chemical), possibly microtubule 'quantum' info transfer but I'm not really on board with that. Not needed). It seems some cells want to live together, same for cell parts themselves, for mutually beneficial reasons for survival. 'Want' used loosely. It's pretty raw intelligence. Robotic but still alive in a semi-controlled environment. -- See Denis Noble and friends. DNA is by no means the whole story, though still the main long term intelligence (useful information) store. The formation of DNA is what counts though... Viruses, symbiosis.. large scale genomic changes through combination. Cross gene flow!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Keep watch!

[@alschneider5420]

During my 81 years of life I have been approached by people telling me there is a god: at work, at Subway, at grocery stores, sitting on a mountain top in Colorado, in malls, in coffee shops, at Walmart, in a dry cleaner, on airplanes, in my apartment, walking down the street, and people like you on YT. After studying several religions during that time and talking to people that want to save my soul, all I see is faith and what ifs, contrived analogies and a book of fiction which you insist on pushing in my face. We can't see, taste, smell, cannot measure, doesn't do anything, cannot describe, but its something that created everything. Then, because we can't prove it doesn't exist it means that it exists. Can you prove; Santa Clause, the Easter bunny, the great pumpkin, the tea pot flying around mars, the spaghetti monster doesn't exist? There is no god.

[@rashadabdulazeem5387]

@@alschneider5420 How sad that you have lived 81 years and have not been thankful for your life and believe your life is an accident or a crap shoot. You are here because you have a purpose I hope you will find it soon. Make no mistake you're going to wake up soon.

[@alschneider5420]

@@rashadabdulazeem5387 I feelSorry for yourSmall awareness of life.

[@ricksmith1382]

Tornadoes, Hurricanes, Tsunamis, birth defects, etc. Intelligent design? My ass. I'd hire a 5 year old to better than that.

[@MugatuJag]

Heritage Foundation…..F*** That🤦‍♂️

[@OBGynKenobi]

Claiming God is LAZINESS. It's for people who don't want to work.

[@bradsmith9189]

What nonsense The irony is you’ve taken the intellectually lazy route and provided nothing to back up you childish claim.

[@OBGynKenobi]

@@bradsmith9189 it's not difficult when you're just just up against fairy tales. Making shit up as explanations for physical phenomena is utter lunacy, there is no need for any argument. Unless you want me to use Sasquatch as the greatest scientific mind in the history the universe, because his uncle went to MIT.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Hosts shared "i" Am Meeks thy seats given will follow thee!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Knows belongs? Will not come to whom don't belongs!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Yes, come seat with me and keep watch!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Why?

[@oliverjamito9902]

Students shared "i" Am remember as HE shared HIS MINDS unto thee. Likewise shared minds unto them! Trying to figure concerning. Just needed to be reminded and comes with comfort already written within my shared "i" Am.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Students shared "i" Am command all the Gods of men to come forth and remind in front! Keep watch!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Seats saying, who is that so familiar voice? Who is that so familiar voice?

[@oliverjamito9902]

Alive yet dead can dead have sincere conversations in front?

[@oliverjamito9902]

My HOSTS Meeks knows? Seats given will follow anywhere nor everywhere shared Feet will go!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Shared "i" Am come forth! What is who am I students? Lord names don't exist in front of thee!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Yes, will even awaken alive yet dead in front!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Wise and Scribes will say, who's child is HE? 2 Edges Sword came in front our Son of Man!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Students will say Lord even creation itself can't exist in front! Why?

[@oliverjamito9902]

Yes, given seats will follow belongs! Seats knows the New Table resting upon the New permanent foundation.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Students shared "i" Am from the mouth of the I AM GOD of the Living.

[@oliverjamito9902]

Yes, will be given new mouths to speak! Will introduce unfamiliar ways of speaking unto many but yet is clear as water unto all whom belongs? Clear as water= clarity, coherence, adequacy,....

[@oliverjamito9902]

Students shared "i" Am what is Gods of men in front?

[@oliverjamito9902]

Seats will say, LORD who are these Who am I sitteth upon all thy Seats?

[@MrFazzza]

Mostly advertising don’t bother

[@Lobexx]

You’ve made more comments on this video than most subscribers

[@oliverjamito9902]

Yes, even all seats knows Who sitteth? Seats principalities who deceiveth exalted sitting in high places unseen nor seen! Seats stared to quake! Seats saying, Who is that so FAMILIAR VOICE?

[@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke]

What is a seat?

[@oliverjamito9902]

Seats go find thy rightful place unto all my shared "i" Am HOSTS MEEKS! Yes,

[@oliverjamito9902]

Students shared "i" Am why hearing our own having sincere conversations in front? Trying to figure thee our LORD!

[@MrFazzza]

Unsubbed

[@Lobexx]

😂

[@oliverjamito9902]

Knows HIM?

[@oliverjamito9902]

Will say, who is that? If ye can't recognize my HOSTS Meeks don't belongs unto thee in front!

[@oliverjamito9902]

Likewise all HE adopted as Sons!

[@briankeating3365]