Physics ki Band Bajadi hai | Why is Current a Scalar Quantity? Right Explanation by NMS Sir

Recently we created a poll on our channel and the outcomes were disappointing.
Join JEE Main Practice Test Series (only 349/-) - www.isacdigita...
We asked the students why the current is a scaler quantity?
98% of students answered that it is a scaler quantity because it doesn't follow the vector law of addition which is a wrong explanation.
Because current density is a vector quantity but it also doesn't follow the vector law of addition.
Many students came up with the assertion that current is a tensor quantity which is an obvious thing because every quantity is called a tensor and then we have different degrees of those tensors.
In this video, NMS sir came up with the correct explanation why current is a scaler quantity and why current density is a vector quantity.
Moreover he also discussed the real logic behind calling quantities as vectors or scalers.
Check out the complete video to unlearn some wrong concepts and learn a new fundamental concept about vector quantities.
#physics #physicseducation #jee #jeemains #iit #jeeadvanced #jee2025 #jeemains2025 #iitjee #nmssir #isaclearning

[@2SiriusPhysics]

I don’t know why YT showed me this video. After watching this and after checking the confidence of this person let me add something. Tell me one situation where current follows vector laws. You will not find a single situation. While calculating magnetic field we don’t take current as vector we take “current element” where we associate small element “dL” which has direction not the current. Similarly in current density we take projected area which is perpendicular to direction of current so that projected area makes it vector not the current. Also you can treat it like charge density times velocity,here velocity is a vector. In AC calculation we add two currents as a vector but in AC it is not a vector it is a sinusoidal quantity which has some phase and frequency and if we add two different sinusoids with same frequency and different phases then we are actually adding their instantaneous values and it follows phasor concepts not the vector concepts. You can say that two sinusoids of same frequency but different phases can be added with the help of phasors and it is similar to vector addition. We are actually adding two sinusoids of same frequency to get a new sinusoid. Tell me one situation where we take current as a vector. You will find none. Moreover it is not like “jaroorat k hisaab se define krtey hn…”everything in physics have meaning and significance. Let me tell you one more point VerySmall angular displacement can be treated as a vector coz it follows vector rules (standard) while the large or finite angular displacement can not be taken as vector coz it violates the basic rules of vectors. So it’s not like” jaroorat k hisaab se define krtey hn” there are standard rules which must be followed by vectors. For deeper understanding read “The Feynman lectures on Physics volume-2”chapter-2 section 2and 3 Volume-1 Chapter-11. From where this confusion came from? When we add current in AC sinusoids (same frequency with different phases) then we can add them by taking it like a vector whose magnitude is max value and phase as angle. Now one more request in this video he is showing that he knows more than others please take a pause and calm down.

[@rahul38327]

Amazing information sir....

[@Singh_Vaibhav_01]

I am sure that sir ko aapka comment read karne ke baad bhi self realisation nhi hoga.

[@shrutisarangi8387]

True, yh bkl khud ko pta nhi kya smjhta h, pura info to yh bhi nhi deta😂

[@Chup_ho_ja]

Yeh hui na baat

[@vikrantsingh8608]

Ur understanding or Electromagnetism is fantastic.....Physics never say "jaroorat k hisab se". It must obey basic Laws

[@HilariousHavenshow]

Current is a scalar as it measures the net charge flow rate through a cross-section, direction-independent. Current density is a vector as it describes the magnitude and direction of charge flow at each point, essential for modeling current distributions and applying Maxwell’s equations in electromagnetism

[@Ghostofjeeadvance]

Ab toh mujhe lg rha h ki , ab tk Maine Puri physics he glt pdi h

[@VinayKumar-zs3ix]

Physics subject hi galat hai

[@AgastyaSinghRajput]

Bhai aisa nhi h yeh teacher jee bewkoof bana rhe tumlogo ko baat ghuma kai .. Baat ghumakar wahi same cheez keh rhe hai . Joh weak mindset k honge brainwash hou jaayenge 😅

[@bfatharvaa2ck]

Aisa teacher ho toh saare sub ko galat prove karde yehi Jo padhayega wohi sahi rahega baaki log toh pagal hai na 🤣

[@physicsiseverything15]

Bhai tumne Puri physics padh Li yahi baari baat hai, scientists bhi nahi padh pa rahe hai tumne cover ka li👍

[@bfatharvaa2ck]

@@physicsiseverything15 chup saale thoda iq rakh

[@sakshambarnwal5726]

First time I have seen someone correcting a wrong concept but by giving another wrong concept (better say stories) and also being so confident in the process 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

[@SufiyanOp-eg4if]

Can you elaborate please?

[@npsingh31]

HC VERMA SIR SE SAHI JAWAB MILEGA YE SAB TO GHUMATE HI RAHENGE

[@Deepthinker4617]

Please elaborate the stories

[@mohammadrizwan01]

HCV IS NOT GOD OF PHYSICS .HE HIMSELF TOLD THAT HE WAS INSPIRED BY RESNICK HALLIDAY​@@npsingh31

[@MouryaGurram]

Sir youtube mein jo bhi teacher sahi phy advance level padhata hi unko hate aur subscribers aur views bahuth kam hota hi .aur unmese aapka channel ek hi .lekin my chahtha hu apkii channel famous hona chahiye thaki sabhi ko sahi phy ka content available mein joga . Thanking you sir ❤.

[@kingasif143]

Thik hi bole a sab concept advanced me ayega..😅😅

[@MouryaGurram]

@@kingasif143 Abey dusra vedios bhi dheko tab samaj mein aayega .

[@primex_i.g9370]

RJ sir ne 2021 mei hi yeh doubt clear kr diya tha 💪

[@HARSHBAIBHAVB]

Correct order ke sath bataya tha rj sir love

[@DHAKAD_BOY_FF]

Ha both sir are JOD ❤

[@Nature._.Beautiful]

Rj sir full name?

[@DHAKAD_BOY_FF]

@@Nature._.Beautiful RAJWANT SINGH 🔥

[@sayanbasumazumder3750]

​@@HARSHBAIBHAVBwhat was the order

[@Deepthinker4617]

All those people who are making personal attacks on Sir, if you have the courage then please answer all the points made by Sir. Sir is really promoting scientific attitude, to learn ,to question❤❤❤

[@jewett425]

Current is scalar becoz of conservation of charge. That is charge flowing towards a point is always equal to charge leaving the point. It doesn't depend on the direction in which charge is flowing.

[@motherisape]

So momentum is also scalar because it also follows conservation

[@PranavPandey]

Your initiatives are appreciable ! Keep up the good work 🙌🏻👍🏻

[@अनुभवकीकविताएं]

Dear friends, aise mahaan teacher se bachke raho. Ye pressure ko bhi jarurat ke hisaab vector kahega aur jhantoo logic dekar proove karne ki koshish karega.

[@SarbatSambhavi-ns1zk]

Only few dare to go on true path and rectify the higher ones, otherwise yes man are everywhere.

[@physics-e-ishq]

Exactly true nms sir ke upar maine video batayi i hai kaise inhone glt logic or ego se apni bt shi krdo Koi maanega nhi kyoki wo legend teacher hai Aise baccho ko chutiye bnate rhenge ye 🙂

[@AnshPathak2005]

​@@SarbatSambhavi-ns1zkSbt sir ki video dekho pta lag jayega

[@Deepthinker4617]

Unka point suna nahi tumne unhone ne kaha "JAHAN HAMEIN DISHA KI ZARURAT HOTI HAI (KISI BHI PHYSICAL QUANTITY KE LIYE) KISI BHI PHENOMENON KO PREDICT KARNE MEIN WAHAN HAM USE VECTOR BOLTE HAIN ,AGAR DISHA KI NEED NAHI HAI PREDICTION MEIN TO HAM USE SCALAR BOLTE HAIN , PLEASE COUNTER HIS LOGIC ,DONT MAKE PERSONAL ATTACKS.

[@manikgoofy]

@@Deepthinker4617toh bhai higher to lower potential jaeyga kaha hai disha ki zarurat😂

[@SKP2102]

I don't know why he is just saying crazy things, no derivations, no proof Here are some popular physics and electronics books that support the answer: 1. "Halliday, Resnick, and Walker's Fundamentals of Physics" (10th edition) - Chapter 28: Electric Current 2. "Serway and Jewett's Physics for Scientists and Engineers" (10th edition) - Chapter 26: Electric Current and Resistance 3. "Giancoli's Physics for Scientists and Engineers" (4th edition) - Chapter 25: Electric Current and Resistance 4. "Kirkpatrick and Wheeler's Physics: A World View" (8th edition) - Chapter 24: Electric Current 5. "Nilsson and Riedel's Electric Circuits" (10th edition) - Chapter 1: Introduction to Electric Circuits In these books, you'll find that electric current is treated as a scalar quantity, with only magnitude (amperes, A) and no direction. However, the direction of current flow is often indicated in circuit diagrams and discussions. Additionally, you can also refer to: - "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" (Volume 2) by Richard Feynman - Chapter 23: Electric Current - "Electricity and Magnetism" by Edward M. Purcell - Chapter 1: Electric Current These books provide a more in-depth understanding of electric current and its behavior, reinforcing the concept of current as a scalar quantity.

[@manasijbhattacharjee959]

This misconception clearance series must be continued... 11 and 12 ka ek Physics ka topic mat chodiye, jisme apko lagta Hain ki widespread misconception Hain please 🙏

[@NMSPhysicsISAC]

Sure

[@Rayhan_ALI]

Yes sir humko bhi ye series ki aur bhi videos chahiye plspls...❤❤❤❤❤

[@Arpitkandari-w3i]

Bhai sir ko support tbhi aur videos jaldi ayenge

[@Drwatson1097]

​@@NMSPhysicsISACI think not scalar be tensor

[@akashgupta6595]

Chutiya ho tum..., Agr itni detail me koi padenga to uska 1lack year me syllabus complete hoga. Aur bachaa neet ya jee quality ni kr payenga. Students ko doctor ya engineer Banna h na ki physicist aur agar physicist in bato ko lekar itne sure hote to ye sari bate books me likhi hoti. Students ko doctor engineer banne do

[@sanskrutirathod-ph7jd]

Thank u so much teacher...in the Era of misinformation...we have someone whom we can trust for appropriate knowledge

[@akbarhussain8522]

Sir arguments karne se NEET JEE clear ho jayega kya?

[@anupanmotive]

Nahi,Dimag badega aur dimag se he NEET clear hoga.

[@DineshKumar-gj5qs]

Saare log bs NEET JEE karne me lage hai No one is interested to know the depth of the subject.

[@SarbatSambhavi-ns1zk]

When clear mistakes of others, we learn a lot. Even the higher authorities should also be in a position to listen about their mistakes, then country will grow manifold

[@udayan6969]

Current is a scalar beacuse it is defined as charge passing THROUGH A PARTICULAR CROSS SECTION IN A GIVEN TIME PERIOD. So CURRENT HAVING DIRECTION DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE. Current density , however, has a direction as it is defined at a particular point (in di/dA, area tends to zero) so it is always a vector. PLEASE REFER TO PROF. HC VERMA'S VIDEO ON THE SAME TOPIC.

[@OmTiwari-z8c]

The only teacher whom i admire from heart...will always support you sir♥️♥️♥️ ...Sir ka ek famous dialogue"physics me feel hi nhi sirf concept ane chahiye"♥️♥️

[@SubhojitPaul-n2k]

After seeing your catchy thumbnail, I decided to watch the video carefully. After viewing the entire video, I tried to identify any misconceptions or new concepts you introduced, but I found none. I'm also puzzled by your claim that 98% of students misunderstand this concept (I'm curious about your source for this data 😝. Proper references and justification are needed if possible). The diagram you drew on your digital board illustrating current addition in branches is based on Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL). Current always follows this law. It's a well-established principle in physics, which uses scalar algebra, not vector algebra. Therefore, if asked why current isn't considered a vector, one can argue that since current doesn't follow vector addition, it isn't a vector. This explanation is accurate, so I'm not sure why you claimed it's incorrect.

[@serviceuser6066]

Actually sir is misleading.. to get views.. Do really students in class 12th needs to learn the relativistic concepts...

[@SubhojitPaul-n2k]

@@serviceuser6066 You are absolutely right. In the name of IIT, they are doing anything which is not relevant. I don't know where he learned this rubbish thing "zaroorat ke hisab se physics main jo chaho woh kar sakteho...". Total rubbish..

[@sachin18kumar1992]

He went from A to B,C,D and came back to A.

[@RAVANm-rc3zx]

1. Electromagnetic Theory: In Maxwell's equations, which form the foundation of classical electromagnetism, current density ( 𝐽 J) is a vector quantity because it describes the current per unit area flowing in a specific direction. However, the total current (I) is the integral of the current density over a cross-sectional area: 𝐼=∫𝐽⋅𝑑𝐴 limits A Here, the dot product 𝐽⋅𝑑𝐴 J⋅dA results in a scalar because it represents the net charge flow through the area 𝐴 A. This integral sums the contributions from all infinitesimal area elements to yield a single scalar value for current.😅

[@abhinavshukla2202]

Some men, change your perspective about life forever. It never matters where they come from, what matters is the mark they leave. NeelMani sir, long long long time ago, I was your student in TPM1 batch, nurture, 2015-16. You changed my worldview, in a lecture on the last day before diwali holidays. I'll never forget that. I'll pay my debt back. I still remember that poem, "Surya ki kiran ka moksh tab hai jab vo mujhse takra ke tumhaari aakho par padti hai".

[@SubhojitPaul-n2k]

The question could be framed in a more intriguing way: Why is current considered a scalar even though current density is a vector quantity? Additionally, current is never treated as a vector in electromagnetism. In Lorentz's law, the velocity of a charge is considered a vector, and the length of a wire is also treated as a vector. However, current is always considered a scalar.

[@Thephysicsplace]

Mr. Galat Pandey was once teaching "centrifugal force balances centripetal force" i tried to correct him in comments and the students abused me the comment section They even said, hum to galat padhenge lekin sir ke khilaf nahi sunenge Teacher fan following is the biggest road block in a students selection

[@VedicSanatanDharma453]

I have noticed. He taught many wrong concepts in mechanics in his channel.

[@kingasif143]

​@@VedicSanatanDharma453which teachar

[@kingasif143]

Kon sa teacher bhai

[@Thephysicsplace]

@@kingasif143 galat Pandey , urf alakh Pandey

[@itishreepanda1641]

​Are bhai wo galat nahi wo trick hai centrifugal and centripetal ko bara bar karke answer nikaoe wo competitive exam nikalva rahe hai achhe se padhna hai wo nit iit me professor achhe se padhaenge yaha adhura gyan mat do​ alakhpandey sir ko galat bolne se pehle khud clg pahuch jao@@Thephysicsplace

[@rahulpatel-cs6jv]

Sir, answer please.... Then , how will you prove theoretically that directions are not important for finding net current?? ( not experimentally)

[@physicsknowhow1229]

You are right. Theoretically the statement is correct a & and of course it can be validated practically..it is well understood, that current is basically flow of charge and resultant of 3 & 4 amp at 90 deg will give results of 5 ampere but total charge was 7 originally. Where has remaining 2 unit of charge gone? ....so it will not disappear any where because charge is conserved and therefore it is not vector quantity as it does not follow vector law of triangle addition

[@rahulpatel-cs6jv]

@isac please answer this

[@ShivamRaj-ke8ti]

Sir aap bahut logical baat karte ho

[@HasmukhKumar-m6x]

is par bhi ab socho ki ye batya ja raha h vo sahi h ya nahi.phele jo teachers batate the vo bhi sahi lagta tha

[@rishabhsoni2635]

That one teacher who says 'mere method se nhi kiya beta to galat hai' He needs to keep his ego aside for such kind of videos. Such type of videos are appropriated but ego that he carries that only his method of explaining something is the only method is not good for any teacher. The point he made that teachers explain current ki vo tensor quantity hai, i agree to this because there is a lot of confusion among teachers that tensors are third type of quantity along with scalar and vector. But i disagree with the fact that he thinks explaining that current is scalar by stating it does not follow vector law is wrong. As anything can be disproved using various methods. Their are plenty of reasons that current is not a vector, and not following vector laws is one of them. Students at 11 and 12th level will not get all the tensor stuff, so they are given the simplest reason. He himself rant for 10 minutes without explaining why the statement "current do not follows vector laws so they are scalar" is wrong because there is nothing wrong with the statement. It is just one way you can explain why current is scalar their are several other ways. I respect the kind of series of videos, but keep the ego aside that will make you the only thing you are going against. Their is no place of ego in physics. Even the greatest mind of all time disagree, but they learn from the discussion and move.Peace ✌️

[@SufiyanOp-eg4if]

But sir also gave the example that even current density doesn't follow vector addition but it is a vector quantity🤔

[@rishabhsoni2635]

@SufiyanOp-eg4if I missed the point where he says that current density does not obey vector laws. It does obey vector laws, but in most cases, we do not need to add current densities. We use equation of continuity in most of the cases. If u r at 12th level, u might not understand, but the divergence of current density is the rate of change of charge density. Dot product of current density with surface element gives electric current(Mathematically current is scalar too).

[@Priyangshu_Editz]

Physics Sir ❌️ Physics KING ✅️

[@bfatharvaa2ck]

Chup saale

[@shrutisarangi8387]

Ghnta

[@AnSh-qg7gr]

same reply ghnta

[@mohanpanchariya1128]

I really love the way you explained... But I am really sorry ... I still didn't understand the reason of current being the scalar quantity. If you have to define perfectly the scalar or vector quantity how will you define ? Is the definition of b answer is wrong ? Its not about just proving others wrong but I need a solid reason to call you as right.🙏 I hope you won't take this comment to be negative. Thank you.

[@VengeanceR_0P-8]

How can teacher understand the difference between PhD and selection level study

[@RanganMukherjee]

True

[@anirbanbhattacharjee8462]

Sir jii aapne jo likha j=I/A wo vector hai nai kyu ki vector ki division defined nai hai Agar koi cheez vector hai toh usko vector addition ke rules follow karne chaiye Haan ye baat hai ki current ki direction zaroori nai isliye hum usko vector nai bolte Aur rahi baat tensor ki toh moment of inertia ko hum plus two level tak scalar hin bolte hai lekin baad me wo rank two tensor ke hisab se act hoti hai To current tensor hai ye confusion wahan se create hua hoga

[@anirbanbhattacharjee8462]

Ek aur baat jo current ka direction hum bolte hai jo dl ban jata magnetic field me wo actually electrons ke velocity ka direction hota hai

[@AnSh-qg7gr]

only in hcv correct explanation is given!!! these all are lyk ...smj gye tum baki

[@theakc3180]

DC Pandey clearly writes current as scalar quantity ❤

[@Rohitsgrv]

Kya clarity h sir, hatts off

[@NishantKumar-mk7jj]

Bhai he is GOAT of physics please

[@user-vj6yd8zc7y]

Bhaut acha sir kuki sach laane ke liye 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 samne main math ka teacher hoon 12th pass aur 12years se pada rha hoon lekin thoda bhaut physics ke baare mein bhi janta hoon bhaut saare teacher galat pada rahe the bhaut saal se lekin aapki himmat ko salute hai 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@NMSPhysicsISAC]

Thank you sir

[@kumarverma9298]

Phd walo ko padha rhe hai ya phir 12th, jee and neet student ko?

[@Tanvir2025]

Sir toh phir work kya vector ho gaya ??? Bcoz it has directions. But does not follow vector law of addition. Work scalar kaise h ?

[@kumarvidhyasagarmahato]

Work doesn't have direction....it is just mechanical way of transfer of energy from one body to other...

[@stranger3944]

I am going to persue integrated phd in astronomy from TIFR and i had this doubt since class 12 that why current density is a vector quantity coz even that doesn't follow the laws of vector addition. After 5 years, my doubt has been ckeared lmao. Kash humare time me bhi ese teachers padhate online

[@ANUJSHARMAIci]

Please read physics again, who said current density don't follow law of vector addition, it follows all laws of vector

[@soumiksaha48thdimension]

It is indeed deeply saddening to see the PhD candidate with unclear concepts being selected in a top research institute like TIFR. As for the explanation, it is very simple and doesn't demand a video. J vector= I/ A vector ( has both mag. and direction). Similarly, J=σ E where E is a vector and in J= ρv ρ= charge density and v= drift velocity of charge carriers. This makes J a vector. And as you know, vectors, scalars and dimensionless quantities all come under tensor matrices, just the orders are different. Thank you.

[@soumiksaha48thdimension]

Another analogy though unrelated. Despite having direction and magnitude, angular displacement is not a vector because it does not obey the commutative law for addition. But when dealing with infinitesimal rotations, second order infinitesimals can be discarded and in this case commutative property appears. The direction of angular displacement is different from that of linear displacement for two reasons. First, it points out of the plane because of the nature of angular displacement. It signifies a rotation, as such, there is not any particular direction unit vector in every coordinate space that could represent it. To signify the direction of something that points in every direction on a plane, it is easy to specify it along the one direction we can be sure the linear displacement isn't pointing normal to the plane. This is a much used convention (such as with area vectors, torque, and many others). As usual as well, we use the Right Hand Rule. The second, and perhaps more important reason is that we always want to ensure that the angular displacement does not correspond to any true displacement that would be in a radial direction. Sorry for copying, I was too lazy to type.

[@sudipmahato1888]

First of all thank you so much, being a physics teacher I can understand your initiative is so important in today's generation, mainly in online platform. Be healthy, With lots of love sir, ..

[@shrutisarangi8387]

U got fooled sir

[@Suraj_ku.shwaha]

🌟 solution is here 🌟🫴🏼 PW batch :- lakshya 1.0 2023-2024 ( rajwant sir is right) Lakshya batch Chapter 3( current electricity) Leactue 1 Time :- 1:23:10 sir ne bataya tha. Yah ak tensor quantity hai with rank zero "0" . But aapke syllabus me nahi so ham kahenge because it follows scaler addition. Please pin me if me and teacher are correct 🙏.

[@angshumanbiswas4869]

Correct h bhai hum 11 ka vector me padha pawan sir ne bhi same bola

[@TonyStark-30001]

Tum log abhi naye ho.

[@Suraj_ku.shwaha]

@@TonyStark-30001 ha bro, kuch baat hai kya ?

[@durgeshkumarchoudhary7359]

Physics fears everybody but NMS SIR fears physics. THE KING OF THE JUNGLE

[@user-brown5911]

I think you just flipped everything

[@Goodjob123-hy2qw]

😂 everyone speaks language but language speaks you

[@Ankitmaths-ln6gl]

No, no one can owns science certainly not him. Not even newton❤❤

[@qfactoreducatingphysics5498]

Sir aap ne kaun si neyi baat bol di ghuma fira ke wahi boldiya sir aapne. I agree u explained in a better way in a good clarity.

[@abhimoymukherjee89]

Very informative video sir thank you so much ❤❤❤🎉

[@natural_science2]

Not True. Current as shown in wires and circuit has one degree of freedom as it can travels only along the length of the wire , hence scalar so direction is not important. Even in the case of Biot Savarts law the direction of velocity of electron is taken into account rather than the direction of current. Velocity is vector, Current along a wire isn't.

[@mathsparaduxe4793]

Yeh bhi shi h

[@nisharaghav2310]

Rajwant sir se padha tha 😢 NmS sir op Pr rajwant sir bhi op h

[@ishaansingh2519]

Rajwanti sir ne bhi yeh baat discuss ki thi current wli mujhe yaad hai jb current electricity ch start ho rha tha

[@rakeshshukla2009]

Wahi na wo aadmi 3 saal se iss topic pe pura ek lecture leta hai aur ye aaj bta ke khud ko God Maan rhe hai, i respect both of you but ye kehna ki ye gyaan sirf mujhe hi hai ye nms sir ki buri baat lgi meko

[@ishaansingh2519]

@@rakeshshukla2009 ha TRUE

[@19mrajay]

Rajwant sir ki profile awesome hai

[@PunyamPC]

bhai agar dhyan se padhte toh samaj ata misinformation na failate, rj sir ne sahi bataya tha unhone myth dur kara tha, batya tha ki it is tensor qty. of rank 0 , mtlb scalar. unhone ye bhi batya tha ki jab magnetic field me direction ki jarurat padhi tab current element let karna pada tha. Edit: aur comment padho , sab khe rahe hai rj sir ne bhi same padhya tha

[@Kittu-bs2qr]

Sir aisi videos banate raho , badhiya samjh aa rha hai , humko bhi or baaki NAAM ke teachero ko bhi 😂

[@physics-e-ishq]

Sir famous hone ke liye simple concept ko complex mt kruye Hope u will understand 🔥♥️

[@utkarshgoyal7420]

kamal hai bhai nms sir ka

[@Ajay_Vector]

I am in those 2% 😅

[@amityogi-z3p]

Sir yeh kya timepass video bna rhe ho app bht knowledgable ho aur hme kya mtlb h apka logic shi h ya hmara jee yeh sb bkwas to nhi puchhta na??? Aur hme koi physcict to bnna nhi h ,vese bhi sir apne baat ghuma phira ke sme hi khi h ,11 12 ke bacho agar starting me hi ese padhane lg jaye to ho gya beda gark .................... Pls keave all this rubish thing like roasting any random experiment and roasting any teacher 😥

[@dibyaahwanmishra5750]

sayadh tu kahin ka nahe hoga na.........

[@amityogi-z3p]

@@dibyaahwanmishra5750 ??? hath ke nakhun kat ke type kro kuchh ple nhi PD rha

[@mathbuster1912]

Jisme physicist banne ki aukat ni h wo na dekhe ye vdo.. Click q kra be ni krta click

[@Farhan74575]

Abhi current electricity nhi pdha But ye smj to pura aagya sir Charan sparsh🫡😍

[@leadersopinion386]

Answer sahi se dijiye Sir, bahut confusion hai. Aur Aap bhi Laymen language me samjha nahi paa rahe hain,

[@anilkumarsharma8901]

Shiksha is ⚖️ 📐 📏 ⚖️ scalers quantity and diksha is directed so its quantity vectors which have both directed in positive direction with right ✅️ decision

[@parthsarthi7980]

Maylab sir halliday and University physics ne bhi galat likha hai aapke hisaab se? Thnj please challenge feyman also

[@HarmonicHighlightz]

AAPKE VIVEO "TITLE " ME SCALAR KA SPELLING GHALAT HAI 😁😁😁 Mere Kahne k baad aapne Scalar ki Spelling Sahi Ki 😂😂😂

[@sayangarai927]

Or tera 'VIDEO' spelling galat hai 😂😂

[@RakeshKumar-lv5sb]

I think, No one should take online classes....after watching your video. Thank you.

[@gedankenxpt2199]

Sir, I heard you are an IIT graduate. And you don't know vector clearly! Surprising! For school student we can define vector as quantity having magnitude, direction, & obeying vector law of addition. There are many quantities having magnitude & (sense of) direction, but not obeying vector law of addition. They are not vector at all. Please note 'obeying vector law of addition' is a necessary condition for a quantity to be a vector. Unfortunately, many (low level, non-rigorous) books do not state but tacitly assume this. For BSc student we can define vector more strictly like this: Vector is a combination of 3 quantities that transform when the coordinate axes rotate according to a definite law. Sir, please read a good book on tensor. You don't know the motivation behind the definition of vector. Once you know it, you will feel embarrassed trolling on those 98% you said wrong. You also seems not knowing the full significance of current density vector. Current density 'j' obeys vector addition law because it works for differential form, but (dc) current 'i' doesn't because it is for integral form. How!? I hope you'd enjoy thinking over this! Many errors in your conceptual understanding! I pick up only two. I ponder over why such errors! I think this is because entrance & board exam never ask deep question on concept, but only definition &/or application type questions. PS: I appreciate your attitude of 'not taking anything for granted' but deplore your trolling nature & overconfidence in your understanding.

[@NMSPhysicsISAC]

Aap e sirf mugga mara hai samjha kuchh nhi you have only words without meaning Sympathy for you

[@AnshPathak2005]

​@@NMSPhysicsISACwatch sbt sir video and then reply sir

[@AnkitPal-45]

Goat of physics ❤

[@NMSPhysicsISAC]

thanks

[@Physicswallahmotivation-t2m]

​Sir 11 physics youtube per padhaye, please . I cannot afford batch

[@fauziazarif]

Sir aapne pechle video mei Velocity of efflux se kyun nhi samjhaya​@@NMSPhysicsISAC

[@Dr..Shivamraj]

So much repect to you for A slap to the teachers who always believe in ratta in physics... I have gone through it...i know, How logic and thought are not cared in this competion phase of surroundings..।। 🙏

[@physicspadhanewallah1]

Sir plz teach class 11 and class 12 physics plz in series for free

[@infonerr]

Is bar aap rah gye... It means your JEE MAINS score is just less by 1 marks and you are failed to explain why current is scalar not vector. Prepare hoyiye fir se

[@albertdot5704]

I know current is tensor quantity but I was told in BTech 3rd year ....nothing earthquake I felt when I didn't know during my jee preparation....koi phad nhi toot pdeyga....ye jaaney sey ki tensor quantity sey.....even... line man don't know nothing about transformer still he can maintain better then engineer...so knowing fancy terminology doesn't make much difference 😕😕

[@PKMATHSpankaj13]

Read it carefully before dancing for debate !!!!! If you take any reputed book then it is clear already. They don't just say only about magnitude and direction but they mention about line of support or they use the word meaningful direction. Most of the students say it doesn't follow law of vector addition ( by keeping intuition about meaningless direction ) . I respect your way of explanation but the way you are trolling other physics teacher may be a little bit polite. Yes, they shouldn't use it as a trick or tactics by dancing 😂.agree

[@arunkumar-pz4id]

I suddenly watched this video as I am an engineer so compelled to write about it .Current is not vector why- Because it’s derived from drifted electrons flow carrying charges per unit time like water or liquid flow .a water flow can not be termed as vector quantity it’s just like that. Don’t confuse students. Your concept is not clear first clear your concept.

[@Shr-ez4ln]

Why can a water flow called not vector quantity?

[@Shr-ez4ln]

Is it because different electronics have different drift speed so one exact magnitude can't be specified?

[@AbhimanyuKumar-ke3qd]

Yes pls reply....why can't flow of water be considered a vector quantity?

[@whocontrolthesenses]

Is trike se too lower standards ki science books bhi galat he , unme bhot se concept he jinhe simple form me diya he to make the student understand easily 😅😅😅😅

[@shivkumar-qs2tz]

Sir physics not end here it goes beyond this level, agar teacher yanhi pe reaserch ki padhai padhane lage to isi tarah har chapter me 20 tarah ke discussion badh jaayega. Aur student physicist to ban jaayega but jee aur medical clear karna difficult ho jaayega.

[@kfaisal789]

Kirchauff law ke according gaya master sahab

[@prince_sinnn]

Never seen a single teacher who ever said esa hi hota hai except school teacher. Current flows in the opposite direction of electron flow, direction to idhar bhi define ki gayi hai, to m isse kya maanu? Scalar ya vector? Ya fir yahi bolta rahu ki experiment krke batunga kya hai? Ab yahan pe nahi bolu kya ki current ki direction ko pehle define kr diya tha or ye baad m pata chala tha ki charge (electron) ki opposite direction m hai?

[@aj_tech456]

Vector :- any quantity which have a value as well as useful direction.😅

[@altmashmalik8757]

Not agree with you a lot...but current is scalar and its direction is direction of velocity positive charge particles

[@ishaansingh2519]

Sir can you pls explain me why in case of EF due to dipole at any theta we cant resolve the distance between the pt. And dipole into its rectangular components ?

[@rohitsharmahimachalindia1633]

Resolve kr ke kroge kya.. Resolve kr ke axial and equitorial par field aa jayega. Jo apko phle se pta tha. Resolve use kro jisko kr ke kaam easily ho jaye,

[@aplusscienceclasses1243]

आपकी विडिओ देख कर लग रहा है की शायद आप ये कहना चाह रहे है की दखो मुझे दूसरे टीचर से ज्यादा आता है , इस विडिओ मे साफ दिख रहा है की आप ही है जिसे सब आता है , ओर सब गलत है सच्चाई तो ये है की इस विडिओ मे आपने भी ठीक से नहीं बताया , किरपया एक विडिओ ओर बनाए जिस मे पूरी डीटेल मे बता रखा हो

[@amitsah1542]

Sir aap ne ghuma phira k wahi kahi jo bachche jaante hai already.

[@chandankumar-hh2sd]

Regarding area ,it is not like we choose whether there is direction or not , to define an area properly the orientation of area is important, that means to define area completely it is not a choice but a compulsion to have a direction,so it is a vector and current doesn't have direction but have a sense

[@Kala-kaadduu-ru3jl]

Nms sir ke aage koi bol sakta hai kya sir mai aapki sari video dekhta hu kabhi Informatiive hoti hai i like u sir very much😊

[@YatharthKalbende13]

MISCONCEPTION is one of the major reason of silly mistakes.. this misconception is the most loved topic for examiner for framing questions.....

[@theKing-dh5gj]

Bhai log ye teacher god hai physics ke ❤

[@SinghRajeshPhysics]

I watched this video three times and every time I neglected his overconfidence. In whole video he didn’t explain why current is scaler quantity. He wants to be over smart but ……………..😂

[@sushiladevi9799]

Ye line satik hai - Disha hone se fark nahin padta , jaroorat hai disha ki to disha upyog karte hain.

[@NMSPhysicsISAC]

You noticed the exact thing

[@siddharthasingh7374]

Rajwant sir kab ka bataya tha ❤

[@NOVA-bz5hd]

SIRJI KE HISAAAB SE SIRF INKO HI SAB PATA HAI🤡🤡🤡 JEE KE LIYE YE SAB JAAN NA ZARURI HAI KYA?

[@WilliamJamesMoriarty-hf6re]

Is jee more important to you or knowledge if you say jee then I can say with surely you won't crack it

[@NOVA-bz5hd]

@@WilliamJamesMoriarty-hf6re bhai tu pakka abhi 11 wala nibba hi hai😂 And for your kind info I have cracked jee with 98%tile.

[@NOVA-bz5hd]

@@WilliamJamesMoriarty-hf6re and bhai please first you learn english😂

[@SufiyanOp-eg4if]

​@@NOVA-bz5hdRight concept is important or else you may get confused along the way

[@zeo887]

​@@NOVA-bz5hd teri kudh ki English ke lwde lge h 😂

[@Ankitmaths-ln6gl]

Now think about newton and Einstein, how intelligent were they use to be.😂😂

[@tiwaritiwari798]

Because it has no spatial direction

[@sunildhuri8421]

What about time then?It is continously moving from past to future since the universe came into existence.It has a spatial direction.

[@loveUIndia_1]

Don't distract students. What you are saying is generally taught in foundation course . Of course here , the teacher matters

[@UmarKhan-ss1pb]

Sach me aaj respect kam ho gyi is chutiyapnti dekh ke , deatil me ise bhi nahi pta mujhe pta he pr me yha itna explain nahi kar paaunga ۔ Phir bhi try karta hu:- Pehli baar vector law of addition points pr defined he or iske liye sbse main position vector he Jese ek ball vector nhi he par uspr agr do vectors ko lgaye jese force ya velocity to force ya velocity jo associate hogi ball se wo vector law follow krenge Current ke case me pehli baat ek electron to he nhi itne sare electrons he or kispar dekhe phir wo wire me confined he free to he nhi haan agr hum sirf ek electron ki wjh se current dekhe or use free space me do different velocities de to phir velocity ki direction ko current ki direction maane to wo vector algebra follow krega par wire ne esa mumkin nhi he or wha streams of electron he ek electron nhi, magnetism ke ek electron ko lekr deal krte he particular direction me hi isliye vector treat krte he sir ghamand me to andhe na hoye plss

[@mathsparaduxe4793]

Hats off you bhai kya bdya explanation diya he

[@UmarKhan-ss1pb]

Yes bro I am a physics student

[@idiotsarmy]

Saleem sir op ❤❤❤

[@tiwaritiwari798]

Pahle vector aaya fir vector k rule aaye

[@sudhansusahoo442]

sir ko award dena chahiye 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

[@47_saikumar19]

GREAT SIR...LATE PATA CHALA AAPKA CHANNEL FEW DAYS ONLY LEFT FOR JEE ADVANCED☹.....I AM NOT AT ALL PREPARED FOR ADVANCED KOII ACCHE SE SAMJANE VAALA MIL HI NAHI RHA....AAP REALLY PHYSICS KA GOD HOO

[@adityajha2889]

4:16 sir dipole wali baat toh bs ek trick sort of batai gyi thi hume Hum log pehle pura derive wagera karake chize batai Fir as a trick to enhance solving speed , ye trick batai gyi Baaki toh sir this series is extremely helful (concepts fir se click hothe dimaag me)

[@QuantumClassesbyDineshSir]

Bhai tum hi padha do na Tum to HC Verma se bhi aage nikal gaye.tensor syllabus me hai kya?

[@avirup_adhya]

HC verma sir cleared this confusion a long time ago

[@kachraseth42O]

We are actually having misconception, we talk about the direction of the wire not the current

[@shaikhfaizan3405]

Books se bas mug up Karli kuch scaler and vector quantities but kabhi uska explanation kisi ne nahi diya ya khud se jaane ki koshish hi nahi ki.

[@govinddugaye5042]

my teacher taught me correctly , neverthless an amazing video!

[@letsevolve9441]

Which..?

[@Thephysicsplace]

Writer vector nasa, u will get a nasa page which defines vector It clearly says vectors are those quantities which requires the information of direction to specify them and scalars are those which do not require information of direction to specify them Unfortunately all Indians books define it wrongly

[@NMSPhysicsISAC]

True

[@DevendraSingh-xh1dv]

Are sir aap bhi 12th yahi sunkar nikale ho ustime par koi ye idea nhi aaya

[@kartik_123]

Think of a force whose director is not important

[@sumitss6lite286]

My own hypothesis/interpretation Vectors are those quantities which are having 'spatial' direction.

[@ShankhajitSinghaRoy]

Sir my humble request please dipole ka component ase kiu nikal te hain please bata do

[@geektalks1758]

I shared this video to my physics teacher along with his notes where he taught us that why current is not a vector quantity by giving that example of not following vector addition after that he blocked my number😢

[@DeepanshuVerma-s9e]

learned something helpful mai bhi vector addition and current he sochta tha