Honestly ur the best watch reviewer on youtube, looking forward to the next review
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the love! Can't wait for the next one!
@tjs57704 жыл бұрын
Really tempted by the new white and black panda bicomplex recently released. I’ve got the evil panda 1962 and I love it.
@ScrambldCraigs5 жыл бұрын
Thats super nice for $250 and the time capsule can be used for other things too. LOVE IT
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
Yeah for sure! Dan Henry makes some great affordable watches that give you that vintage feel!
@VinceDae5 жыл бұрын
Sooooooo good man! I actually think I will get this watch - it looked incredible on your wrist man!
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
Vince Dae So great! I think the 1962 model is a great option for something more sporty. 😁
@Hellacop64 жыл бұрын
Super review of an superb watch, buying the evil pand Bicompax right now! Thanks
@IslandTimeWatchReview4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! The Bicompax is super cool. Enjoy it!
@maiseydoodle5 жыл бұрын
Great review!
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@alexk85995 жыл бұрын
Somehow your lighting and/or camera captures the blue tinge better than TGV's review, and this has pretty much made the decision for me to buy the watch.
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
Even being compared to TGV at all and being a newer reviewer, I really appreciate that. Enjoy Alex! It's a wonderful piece!
@docgify4 жыл бұрын
Looking fwd to more reviews from you... keep going dude your good dont give up
@IslandTimeWatchReview4 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for the support! Just enjoying making videos! 😊
@thisoldbelair3 жыл бұрын
Nice watch for sure. I’m in love with the Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chrono but I can’t in good conscience buy a $2k watch with three small kids haha. I just wish the 1964 had more colors besides black and white, and I wish the bicompax had a seconds subdial instead of the 24 hour subdial which I find unnecessary. That’s my big hang up, but I’m awful close to buying a 1964 anyway haha. We’ll see. Thanks for the video!
@ronin71065 жыл бұрын
Hi. First time to catch you in the tube. First and foremost, love the intro kapatid, but the true and straight-up review was just awesome . I have my eyes set on the Panda. After your review, Im so confused wether to take the Good or the Evil version :). If the bracelet would fit a Speedmaster FOIS, I'll take one now. See you around bro.
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
Ronin Thanks for watching! I think this is one of those rare cases where going evil or good doesn’t matter because both are just so good 😊
@vikkotaruc2 жыл бұрын
Awesome review for this awesome product! I’m hoping to buy the white panda version and ship it to the Philippines 🙂 am actually picking between the Moonswatch and this one.
@maxhulker47715 жыл бұрын
You’re getting great at these
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
Max Hulker Thanks for the love! Always working to get better!
@KrazyShark4 жыл бұрын
260$, vintage style watch, sapphire crystal, comes with a nice rice bead style band, extra leather band, watch roll for 3 watches to travel with, man oh man am i tempted. Dan Henry really made something special here.
@sithi963 жыл бұрын
no sapphire
@davidsparling35054 жыл бұрын
Excellent review! Very impressed with what Dan Henry has been able to accomplish for such a low price. Nice presentation, however you might reduce the frequency of the use of “really really”. Hope you don’t take offense at that.
@IslandTimeWatchReview4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching for the constructive criticism! I'm always trying to improve :-)
@baseball1991215 жыл бұрын
Did you have to take any links out of the bracelet for it to fit your wrist? My wrist is about the same size as yours.
@daviewavie1124 жыл бұрын
What do you think about the all silver version? The lighter one
@jonboy818111 ай бұрын
Nice watch. I think your bracelet is on backwards?
@yousefgeorge30605 жыл бұрын
Ik this is late, but which do you think is better to wear daily? The 1962 or 64?
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
I don't own a Dan Henry 1962, but in my opinion, the 62 looks more sporty. So I think it really depends on if daily wear for you is more sporty or dressy. I find that the 1964 can double as a more dressy piece!
@yousefgeorge30605 жыл бұрын
Island Time Watch Review thanks, I appreciate it
@KlausBioMadsen4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review, really useful! By any chance could you tell me the name of the song you're playing at the intro? It sounds rad!
@IslandTimeWatchReview4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Actually, it's stock music I got from an app called Splice!
@goldenwarrior56642 жыл бұрын
Got this watch to wear everyday but found out to nice
@scottmacmillan94364 жыл бұрын
Is it difficult to adjust the bracelet for size? I couldn't see whether it was screw or pin.
@IslandTimeWatchReview4 жыл бұрын
Actually the bracelet is screw. Very easy to adjust!
@scottmacmillan94364 жыл бұрын
@@IslandTimeWatchReview Thanks very much.
@monkeyman82655 жыл бұрын
Nice size too many watches are oversized. I really want to get this exact evil panda dial one.
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
I agree! The comfort of a 38mm or smaller watch is something that is overlooked. I really hope sizing like this becomes more popular again!
@maiseydoodle5 жыл бұрын
I just purchased the Evil Panda. It looks even better in person. One of the best watch values out there.
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
@@maiseydoodle So great! I was wearing mine just yesterday. It's so versatile.
@VictorGuillen_FRC3 жыл бұрын
Great content, I have the Dan 1962 Gold, where did you get that bracelet?
@davidgluskie86204 жыл бұрын
I bought the bicompax date evil panda version
@yousefgeorge30605 жыл бұрын
Keep making content!
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the support! I'm definitely planning to keep making videos!
@andreigandila67635 жыл бұрын
Very good review, although "flyback" as a chronograph function means something completely different. What you're showing is a basic reset.
@IslandTimeWatchReview5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Sorry if I misspoke! Still pretty new to doing reviews. Thank you
@docgify4 жыл бұрын
Sorry mate i didnt realize that... i like the bicompax because the date at the 6 ... ibought the bicompax evil panda date... and no i dont have money for 3000 dollar watches either...;-(
@davidgluskie86204 жыл бұрын
No one ever mentions that it comes in date and no date bicompax as well
@IslandTimeWatchReview4 жыл бұрын
I was excited to see them offer bicompax! I believe I posted this review before they offered this. Sorry!
@andytaylor23212 жыл бұрын
I bought one but you need special tools to remove bracelet. A real pita. Otherwise it’s just ok the watch. Leather band is flimsy.
@blackimp4987 Жыл бұрын
I love his watches but the choice many are making to use chrono movements with UTTERLY USELESS 24h SUBDIAL makes me wanna bang my head on the wall until one of the two breaks. WHY the hell producers include those idiot movements that basically castrate chrono functions? WHY the hell? I'm no expert, I've just decided to buy a good chrono because I often use timer on my smartphone and I hate having to touch its glass continually to reactivate it. I used to wear a good Swatch Irony that I still like but I want a real reparable watch. My Irony has the tipical chrono subdials: tenth od secs, minutes and second for time. It would be good as well having mins and hours for chrono. I've been searching for some quartz watch, around 40mm, with classical design, black dial and leather or synsthetic bracelet... it's IMPOSSIBLE. either they are huge - Tissot has many models but 43-45mm - or they have hat stupid useless 24h subdial. WHY?? Dan Henry 1962 black or white versions are beautiful but they have that stupid subdial, 1963 42mm version it would ok but black version is over, 1964 beautiful... again the 24h subdial. I've searched for many other brands: there's nothing like this. Just a Casio that cosmetically is nothing particular. The first watch with these characteristics but automatic is Tag Heuer Carrera, black, that is 6500 €. Bulova has something 42-45mm but not as good cosmetically. Hamilton Jazzmaster is more expensive and it's 42mm , with an original design but not that makes so enthusiast. Seiko just a couple but nothing elegant. But really why the hell that subdial, why?