Iso-Acoustics Pucks Sound Test/Review

[@magick1969]

The puck isolates the translational waves orthonormal to the bass/mid/tweet cones in a speaker cabinet. In other words, as a cone fires the iso-acoustic puck cancels out the unnecessary noise vibrations radially from the surface area that it is in contact with. Put on 4 points of a speaker and you remove any orthonormal sound waves passes through the speaker cabinet into the flooring [or monitor stand base plate] leaving a cleaner response of only the speaker so you hear your mix more correctly and/or the audio from the original source of a film. Sticking that test measurement device on the table is missing the radially fired vibrations [90 degrees and orthonormal to the wave form of those tensor manifold wave forms that create an audio ocean wave radiating around the perimeter of the cone firing] from that tiny speaker. What you're doing is muffling the sound directly before it creates radially viable wave energy through the desk. Just put your monitor on the table and play a track. Then put 4 pucks under that same monitor between the desk and the monitor. Show the difference in output as that is what you'll get using the iso pucks.

[@ju1ceaudio]

Well said. The difference is going to be inaudible over youtube.

[@erehwondon4026]

thank you for explaining that. with all respect to the conntent creator, I couldn't seem to know why I didn't find this test useful but you explain it very good. I think you should do one more test

[@alex_ayers]

I was about to make a comment that you should do a review on the ISO Acoustic desk stands, but I'm glad I waited until the end to hear your opinion on those too!! 🙌🏻

[@ju1ceaudio]

yup, i love them on my new set up with a standing desk

[@tomscott4438]

They market these for speaker applications, but I find their greatest benefit is under gear, especially tube gear. My speakers are on sand-filled stands with carpet piercing spikes. Any sound or vibration is therefore minimalized. Under gear (amp, preamp, phono preamp, turntable, etc) they do a great job of minimizing noise causing vibration. FYI, the Pucks are actually designed to also compensate for the lateral movement of the speaker drivers as they move in and out.

[@aveoaudiobackgroundmusic983]

Old fart, how much did you get paid?)

[@ludovicmorelon6771]

Very cool video that clearly show what it does! Thanks a lot!

[@ju1ceaudio]

You're welcome! there a-lot of audio snake oil out there so I hope it helped!

[@shanofpunjab]

love the intro!!

[@ju1ceaudio]

Yupp

[@ProducedByChristo]

I have the JBL LSR sub so i dont think i would need these. Btw bro, at what level do you set your JBL sub in the back when your using it?

[@ju1ceaudio]

Shoot I'll have to check but it's around 3/4 of the way up

[@ProducedByChristo]

@@ju1ceaudio Okay

[@CarlosMendez003]

I’m subscriber 575 :) love your reviews. Getting the JBL LSR310S because of your other review.

[@ju1ceaudio]

appreciate you bro!

[@L.A-h5s]

even if you put a simple rubber or a book you hear differently . I am not sure you are using the wright measurments.

[@DLoudon]

Did you ever had the chance of comparing the iso pucks to a vibration damper for washing mashines? Im courious how much of a difference there is concidering the price difference. Anyways - nice video!

[@ju1ceaudio]

I dont think ive seen one of those before. But im sure there are many ways to build something like this for a lot cheaper

[@ProducedByChristo]

Please make more videos about the JBL Sub, excusion videos aswell

[@ju1ceaudio]

The excursion?

[@ProducedByChristo]

@@ju1ceaudio Yea a video where your playing music while having the camera pointed on the cone showing the excursion i think would be interesting

[@bigbrotherspodcast]

🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽 good one !

[@ju1ceaudio]

thanks bro

[@reallyniceaudio]

interesting test!

[@ju1ceaudio]

Thanks bro!

[@reallyniceaudio]

@@ju1ceaudio I ended up getting some iso pucks, even though my stands are filled with sand and have spikes. It made such a difference I had to do another Dirac room correction. Who would have thought?